hes1-protein--human and Cell-Transformation--Viral

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), a common cancer worldwide, is etiologically associated with tobacco use, high alcohol consumption, and high-risk human papillomaviruses (HPV). The Notch signaling pathway, which is involved in cell differentiation decisions with differential downstream targets and effects depending on tissue type and developmental stage, has been implicated in human HNSCC.. To assess the role of Notch signaling in HPV-positive and HPV-negative HNSCC, we utilized genetically engineered mouse (GEM) models for conventional keratinizing HNSCC, in which either HPV16 E6 and E7 oncoproteins or a gain-of-function mutant p53 are expressed, and in which we inactivated canonical Notch signaling via expression of a dominant negative form of MAML1 (DNMAML1), a required transcriptional coactivator of Notch signaling.. Loss of canonical Notch signaling increased tumorigenesis in both contexts and also caused an increase in nuclear β-catenin, a marker for increased tumorigenic potential. When combined with loss of canonical Notch signaling, HPV oncogenes led to the highest frequency of cancers overall and the largest number of poorly differentiated (high-grade) cancers.. These findings inform on the contribution of loss of canonical Notch signaling in head and neck carcinogenesis.

Topics: Animals; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Disease Models, Animal; DNA-Binding Proteins; Female; Gene Expression; Head and Neck Neoplasms; Human papillomavirus 16; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Oncogene Proteins, Viral; Papillomavirus E7 Proteins; Papillomavirus Infections; Receptors, Notch; Repressor Proteins; Severity of Illness Index; Signal Transduction; Transcription Factor HES-1; Transcription Factors

Perturbation of keratinocyte differentiation by E6/E7 oncoproteins of high-risk human papillomaviruses that drive oncogenic transformation of cells in squamocolumnar junction of the uterine cervix may confer "stem-cell like" characteristics. However, the crosstalk between E6/E7 and stem cell signaling during cervical carcinogenesis is not well understood. We therefore examined the role of viral oncoproteins in stem cell signaling and maintenance of stemness in cervical cancer.. Isolation and enrichment of cervical cancer stem-like cells (CaCxSLCs) was done from cervical primary tumors and cancer cell lines by novel sequential gating using a set of functional and phenotypic markers (ABCG2, CD49f, CD71, CD133) in defined conditioned media for assessing sphere formation and expression of self-renewal and stemness markers by FACS, confocal microscopy, and qRT-PCR. Differential expression level and DNA-binding activity of Notch1 and its downstream targets in CaCxSLCs as well as silencing of HPVE6/Hes1 by siRNA was evaluated by gel retardation assay, FACS, immunoblotting, and qRT-PCR followed by in silico and in vivo xenograft analysis.. CaCxSLCs showed spheroid-forming ability, expressed self-renewal and stemness markers Oct4, Sox2, Nanog, Lrig1, and CD133, and selectively overexpressed E6 and HES1 transcripts in both cervical primary tumors and cancer cell lines. The enriched CaCxSLCs were highly tumorigenic and did recapitulate primary tumor histology in nude mice. siRNA silencing of HPVE6 or Hes1 abolished sphere formation, downregulated AP-1-STAT3 signaling, and induced redifferentiation.. Our findings suggest the possible mechanism by which HPVE6 potentially regulate and maintain stem-like cancer cells through Hes1. Clin Cancer Res; 22(16); 4170-84. ©2016 AACR.

Topics: Animals; ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Biomarkers; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Self Renewal; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Cell Transformation, Viral; Disease Models, Animal; Female; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Genes, fos; Genes, jun; HeLa Cells; Humans; Mice; Mice, Inbred NOD; Models, Biological; Neoplastic Stem Cells; Oncogene Proteins, Viral; Protein Interaction Maps; Receptor, Notch1; RNA Interference; Signal Transduction; STAT3 Transcription Factor; Transcription Factor HES-1; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms

EBV nuclear antigen 2 (EBNA2) and EBV nuclear antigen LP (EBNALP) are critical for B-lymphocyte transformation to lymphoblastoid cell lines (LCLs). EBNA2 activates transcription through recombination signal-binding immunoglobulin κJ region (RBPJ), a transcription factor associated with NCoR repressive complexes, and EBNALP is implicated in repressor relocalization. EBNALP coactivation with EBNA2 was found to dominate over NCoR repression. EBNALP associated with NCoR and dismissed NCoR, NCoR and RBPJ, or NCoR, RBPJ, and EBNA2 from matrix-associated deacetylase (MAD) bodies. In non-EBV-infected BJAB B lymphoma cells that stably express EBNA2, EBNALP, or EBNA2 and EBNALP, EBNALP was associated with hairy and enhancer of split 1 (hes1), cd21, cd23, and arginine and glutamate-rich 1 (arglu1) enhancer or promoter DNA and was associated minimally with coding DNA. With the exception of RBPJ at the arglu1 enhancer, NCoR and RBPJ were significantly decreased at enhancer and promoter sites in EBNALP or EBNA2 and EBNALP BJAB cells. EBNA2 DNA association was unaffected by EBNALP, and EBNALP was unaffected by EBNA2. EBNA2 markedly increased RBPJ at enhancer sites without increasing NCoR. EBNALP further increased hes1 and arglu1 RNA levels with EBNA2 but did not further increase cd21 or cd23 RNA levels. EBNALP in which the 45 C-terminal residues critical for transformation and transcriptional activation were deleted associated with NCoR but was deficient in dismissing NCoR from MAD bodies and from enhancer and promoter sites. These data strongly support a model in which EBNA2 association with NCoR-deficient RBPJ enhances transcription and EBNALP dismisses NCoR and RBPJ repressive complexes from enhancers to coactivate hes1 and arglu1 but not cd21 or cd23.

Topics: Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cell Line; Cell Transformation, Viral; DNA; Enhancer Elements, Genetic; Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens; Gene Expression Regulation, Viral; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Immunoglobulin J Recombination Signal Sequence-Binding Protein; Models, Biological; Multiprotein Complexes; Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 1; Nuclear Receptor Co-Repressor 2; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Receptors, Complement 3d; Receptors, IgE; Transcription Factor HES-1; Viral Proteins

The mechanistic contribution of the Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) EBNA-LP protein to B-cell immortalization remains an enigma. However, previous studies have indicated that EBNA-LP may contribute to immortalization by enhancing EBNA2-mediated transcriptional activation of the LMP-1 gene. To gain further insight into the potential role EBNA-LP has in EBV-mediated B-cell immortalization, we asked whether it is a global or gene-specific coactivator of EBNA2 and whether coactivation requires interaction between these proteins. In type I Burkitt's lymphoma cells, we found that EBNA-LP strongly coactivated EBNA2 stimulation of LMP-1 and LMP2B RNAs, which are expressed from the viral divergent promoter. Surprisingly, the viral LMP2A gene and cellular CD21 and Hes-1 genes were induced by EBNA2 but showed no further induction after EBNA-LP coexpression. We also found that EBNA-LP did not stably interact with EBNA2 in coimmunoprecipitation assays, even though the conditions were adequate to observe specific interactions between EBNA2 and its cellular cofactor, CBF1. Colocalization between EBNA2 and EBNA-LP was not detectable in EBV-transformed cell lines or transfected type I Burkitt's cells. Finally, no significant interactions between EBNA2 and EBNA-LP were found with mammalian two-hybrid assays. From this data, we conclude that EBNA-LP is not a global coactivator of EBNA2 targets, but it preferentially coactivates EBNA2 stimulation of the viral divergent promoter. While this may require specific transient interactions between these proteins that only occur in the context of the divergent promoter, our data strongly suggest that EBNA-LP also cooperates with EBNA2 through mechanisms that do not require direct or indirect complex formation between these proteins.

Topics: B-Lymphocytes; Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Transcription Factors; Cell Transformation, Viral; Cells, Cultured; Epstein-Barr Virus Nuclear Antigens; Gene Expression Regulation, Viral; Herpesvirus 4, Human; Homeodomain Proteins; Humans; Immunoprecipitation; Promoter Regions, Genetic; Protein Binding; Receptors, Complement 3d; RNA, Messenger; RNA, Viral; Transcription Factor HES-1; Transcription, Genetic; Two-Hybrid System Techniques; Viral Matrix Proteins; Viral Proteins