heparitin-sulfate and Thrombophilia

Despite the progress made in the development of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) equipment, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin and post-bypass neutralization with protamine are still used in most perfusion procedures. However, there are a number of situations where unfractionated heparin, protamine or both cannot be used for various reasons. Intolerance of protamine can be addressed with extracorporeal heparin removal devices, perfusion with (no) low systemic heparinization and, to some degree, by perfusion with alternative anticoagulants. Various alternative anticoagulation regimens have been used in cases of intolerance to unfractionated heparin, including extreme hemodilution, low molecular weight heparins, danaparoid, ancrod, r-hirudin, abciximab, tirofiban, argatroban and others. In the presence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and thrombosis, the use of r-hirudin appears to be an acceptable solution which has been well studied. The main issue with r-hirudin is the difficulty in monitoring its activity during CPB, despite the fact that ecarin coagulation time assessment is now available. A more recent approach is based on selective blockage of platelet aggregation by means of monoclonal antibodies directed to GPIIb/IIIa receptors (abciximab) or the use of a GPIIb/IIIa inhibitor (tirofiban). An 80% blockage of the GPIIb/IIIa receptors and suppression of platelet aggregation to less than 20% allows the giving of unfractionated heparin and running CPB in a standard fashion despite HIT and thrombosis. Likewise, at the end of the procedure, unfractionated heparin is neutralized with protamine as usual and donor platelets are transfused if necessary. GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors are frequently used in interventional cardiology and, therefore, are available in most hospitals.

Topics: Abciximab; Ancrod; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Anticoagulants; Arginine; Cardiopulmonary Bypass; Chondroitin Sulfates; Cross Reactions; Dermatan Sulfate; Drug Combinations; Drug Hypersensitivity; Factor Xa Inhibitors; Hemodilution; Hemorrhage; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Heparitin Sulfate; Hirudin Therapy; Humans; Immunoglobulin Fab Fragments; Perfusion; Pipecolic Acids; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Protamines; Sulfonamides; Thrombocytopenia; Thrombophilia; Thrombosis; Tirofiban; Tyrosine

Thromboembolism is an infrequent, yet serious cause of both maternal and fetal morbidity and death during pregnancy and the puerperium. Antithrombotic treatment and prophylaxis both before and during pregnancy are based on unfractionated heparin (UH), low-molecularweight heparin (LMWH), Warfarin and Aspirin. The prevalence and severity of thromboembolism during pregnancy and puerperium warrant special consideration of management and therapy. Such therapy includes the treatment of acute thrombotic events and prophylaxis for those at increased risk of thrombotic events. This paper assesses the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic therapy during pregnancy and the peripartum period. Its cardiovascular and obstetric indications, the evidence of association between thrombophilias and adverse pregnancy outcome, regimens and maternal and fetal side-effects are also discussed.

Topics: Anticoagulants; Aspirin; Bone Density; Breast Feeding; Chondroitin Sulfates; Dermatan Sulfate; Female; Fondaparinux; Heparin; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Polysaccharides; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications, Hematologic; Thromboembolism; Thrombophilia; Warfarin

Itching erythematous or eczematous plaques around injection sites are quite frequent side effects of heparin treatment and are clinical symptoms of a delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins. In most cases, changing the subcutaneous therapy from unfractionated to low molecular weight heparin or treatment with heparinoids does not provide improvement, due to extensive cross-reactivity. Interestingly, it has been demonstrated that patients with delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins tolerate intravenous application of heparin in controlled challenge tests. A patient with known delayed-type hypersensitivity to heparins received the heparinoid, danaparoid, subcutaneously for thrombosis prophylaxis after orthopedic surgery. After the first few injections, eczematous plaques developed; administration of the anticoagulant was continued and gradually resulted in generalized eczema despite treatment with topical and oral glucocorticoids. However, the patient required further anticoagulation. After discontinuation of subcutaneous injections and a switch to intravenous heparin, rapid improvement and clearing of skin lesions occurred. Therefore, in cases of delayed-type hypersensitivity to subcutaneously injected heparins, the switch from subcutaneous to intravenous heparin administration may be justified.

Topics: Aged; Anticoagulants; Chondroitin Sulfates; Dermatan Sulfate; Dermatitis, Allergic Contact; Eczema; Female; Heparin; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Immobilization; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Postoperative Care; Postoperative Complications; Thrombophilia; Venous Thrombosis

We report the case of 64-year-old female patient with pulmonary embolism and bilateral femoropopliteal deep vein thrombosis caused by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II (HIT II) resistant to danaparoid sodium and subsequently administered lepirudin in whom a single late plasmapheresis performed on day 6 of the initiation of treatment of HIT reversed the course of the disease, preventing its highly potential fatal outcome. Primarily administered lepirudin was not only ineffective but even led to further aggravation of the patient's clinical state and platelet count drop in the first stage of the HIT treatment. The improvement of the patient's clinical state was not achieved before therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) had removed the greatest part of pathogenetic circulating substrate. Only after TPE, lepirudin, introduced again, led to the platelet count recovery. In the subsequent course of the treatment, lepirudin was combined with an overlapping oral anticoagulant. Previously positive heparin aggregation test and fast particle gel heparin-platelet factor 4 immunoassay were normalized as well as the patient's clinical status. Early plasmapheresis, administered within 4 days of the onset of thrombocytopenia in HIT, as a beneficial therapeutic measure in certain individual cases, is indisputable. However, our results do not concur with previously reported findings of the so far most comprehensive study on plasmapheresis performed in the management of HIT with thrombosis, discrediting late plasmapheresis administered 4 days after the onset of the disease not only as ineffective, but even as an aggravating factor. Our results suggest the possible beneficial impact of late plasmapheresis as a method that may reverse a prothrombotic process and lead to a fast improvement in the patient's platelet count, especially in cases initially resistant to thrombin inhibitors.

Topics: Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Autoantibodies; Chondroitin Sulfates; Dermatan Sulfate; Drug Resistance; Female; Fibrinolytic Agents; Heparin; Heparitin Sulfate; Hip Fractures; Hirudins; Humans; Middle Aged; Partial Thromboplastin Time; Plasma; Plasmapheresis; Postoperative Complications; Pulmonary Embolism; Purpura, Thrombocytopenic, Idiopathic; Recombinant Proteins; Salvage Therapy; Thrombophilia; Time Factors

Patients with malignancy often present with a variety of coagulation abnormalities which may ultimately lead to recurrent arterial and venous thromboses. Recently the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies in cancer patients has been proposed as one of the potential mechanisms promoting hypercoagulability. Here we report two consecutive patients with localized tumors, one suffering from breast cancer and another presenting with colorectal cancer, who experienced dramatic exacerbation of the antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APAS) within 4 weeks after surgery. In the first patient who had also received one course of adjuvant chemotherapy, major ischemic stroke and recurrent venous thromboembolism were paralleled by the development of ulcerative livedoid vasculitis and pancytopenia, constituting the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary APAS. In the second patient, progressive thrombotic occlusion of the superior and inferior vena cava was associated with bilateral pulmonary embolism, acute renal failure, and disabling soft tissue edema. Although not fulfilling the classic criteria of "catastrophic" APAS, the clinical features were life threatening and appeared to be refractory to oral anticoagulation with phenprocoumon. In addition, a diagnosis of Trousseau's syndrome was unlikely due to missing evidence of gross metastatic disease. Besides a suggested treatment strategy comprising high doses of low-molecular-weight heparin, potential pathogenic mechanisms are discussed in consideration of a recently proposed "thrombotic storm," which may cause multiple thromboses after an initial provocation in patients with known hypercoagulability.

Topics: Adult; Antiphospholipid Syndrome; Breast Neoplasms; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Chondroitin Sulfates; Colorectal Neoplasms; Dermatan Sulfate; Drug Combinations; Female; Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Stroke; Thromboembolism; Thrombophilia