heparitin-sulfate has been researched along with Corneal-Ulcer* in 2 studies
1 review(s) available for heparitin-sulfate and Corneal-Ulcer
Article | Year |
---|---|
Role of heparan sulfate in ocular diseases.
Heparan sulfate (HS), a ubiquitous and structurally diverse cell surface polysaccharide and extracellular matrix component, is a factor common to several major eye pathologies. Its multitude of functions and variable distribution among the different ocular tissues makes it an important contributor to a variety of disease states. Although HS facilitates the pathogenesis of many disorders, its role in each varies. Unique functions of HS have been particularly noted in viral and bacterial keratitis and age-related macular degeneration. Combined, these pathologies comprise a large portion of conditions leading to visual impairment worldwide. Given this prevalence of diseases facilitated by HS, it is prudent to take an in-depth look at this compound in the context of these pathologic states. While the initial part of the review will discuss the pathogenic aspects of HS, it is also important to consider the wider implications of such roles for HS. The remainder of the article will specifically address one such implication, the possibility for future use of novel HS-based therapeutics to combat these eye pathologies. Topics: Animals; Corneal Neovascularization; Corneal Ulcer; Eye Diseases; Heparitin Sulfate; Humans; Keratitis, Herpetic; Macular Degeneration | 2013 |
1 other study(ies) available for heparitin-sulfate and Corneal-Ulcer
Article | Year |
---|---|
CMDBS, functional analogue of heparin sulfate as a new class of corneal ulcer healing agents.
Soluble dextran polymer derivatives (CMDBSs) are originally synthesized as heparin-like plasma substitutes. Some of them mimic heparin in its interactions and stabilize, protect and facilitate actions of heparin binding growth factors. The wound healing activity of one specific CMDBS was studied in a model of corneal ulcer on the rabbit eye and compared with the activity of basic fibroblast growth factors (bFGF) added alone or in association with CMDBS. Total reepithelization was observed with bFGF + CMDBS, bFGF alone and CMDBS alone after, respectively, 3.8 +/- 0.78, 4.3 +/- 0.67 and 4.4 +/- 0.51 days. All treatments were efficient if compared with eyes treated with saline (p < 0.0001). The grade of significance of the applied treatments was as follows: bFGF + CMDBS > bFGF > CMDBS > saline. Our study pinpoints that some specific CMDBS are as potent agents as bFGF for corneal ulcer healing, and can therefore be proposed for therapeutic use. Topics: Animals; Cell Line; Cells, Cultured; Cornea; Corneal Ulcer; Cricetinae; Dextrans; Disease Models, Animal; Drug Therapy, Combination; Epithelium; Fibroblast Growth Factor 2; Fibroblasts; Heparitin Sulfate; Lung; Male; Ophthalmic Solutions; Rabbits; Wound Healing | 1994 |