harpagoside and Low-Back-Pain

Various preparations from Harpagophytum procumbens are used for the treatment of pain in the joints and lower back. Studies published in peer reviewed journals were examined for their clinical evidence. The studies offering preparations with 50-60 mg harpagoside in the daily dosage are of better quality and provide more reliable evidence on efficacy than a proprietary ethanol extract with half the amount of harpagoside per day. However, confirmatory studies are required for all extracts before they can gain a place in treatment guidelines.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Clinical Trials as Topic; Glycosides; Harpagophytum; Humans; Low Back Pain; Osteoarthritis; Phytotherapy; Plant Extracts; Pyrans

The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of Harpagophytum procumbens preparations in the treatment of various forms of musculoskeletal pain.. Several databases and other sources were searched to identify randomized controlled trials, quasi-randomized controlled trials, and controlled clinical trials testing Harpagophytum preparations in adults suffering from pain due to osteoarthritis or low back pain.. Given the clinical heterogeneity and insufficient data for statistical pooling, trials were described in a narrative way, taking into consideration methodological quality scores. Twelve trials were included with six investigating osteoarthritis (two were identical trials), four low back pain, and three mixed-pain conditions.. There is limited evidence for an ethanolic Harpagophytum extract containing less than <30 mg harpagoside per day in the treatment of knee and hip osteoarthritis. There is moderate evidence of effectiveness for (1) the use of a Harpagophytum powder at 60 mg harpagoside in the treatment of osteoarthritis of the spine, hip and knee; (2) the use of an aqueous Harpagophytum extract at a daily dose of 100 mg harpagoside in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic non-specific low back pain; and (3) the use of an aqueous extract of Harpagophytum procumbens at 60 mg harpagoside being non-inferior to 12.5 mg rofecoxib per day for chronic non-specific low-back pain (NSLBP) in the short term. Strong evidence exists for the use of an aqueous Harpagophytum extract at a daily dose equivalent of 50 mg harpagoside in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic NSLBP.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Arthralgia; Chronic Disease; Glycosides; Harpagophytum; Humans; Low Back Pain; Osteoarthritis; Pain Measurement; Phytotherapy; Plant Extracts; Plant Preparations; Plant Roots; Powders; Pyrans

Two daily doses of oral Harpagophytum extract WS 1531 (600 and 1200, respectively, containing 50 and 100 mg of the marker harpagoside) were compared with placebo over 4 weeks in a randomized, double-blind study in 197 patients with chronic susceptibility to back pain and current exacerbations that were producing pain worse than 5 on a 0-10 visual analogue scale. The principal outcome measure, based on pilot studies, was the number of patients who were pain free without the permitted rescue medication (tramadol) for 5 days out of the last week. The treatment and placebo groups were well matched in physical characteristics, in the severity of pain, duration, nature and accompaniments of their pain, the Arhus low back pain index and in laboratory indices of organ system function. A total of 183 patients completed the study. The numbers of pain-free patients were three, six and 10 in the placebo group (P), the Harpagophytum 600 group (H600) and the Harpagophytum 1200 group (H1200) respectively (P = 0.027, one-tailed Cochrane-Armitage test). The majority of responders' were patients who had suffered less than 42 days of pain, and subgroup analyses suggested that the effect was confined to patients with more severe and radiating pain accompanied by neurological deficit. However, subsidiary analyses, concentrating on the current pain component of the Arhus index, painted a slightly different picture, with the benefits seeming, if anything, to be greatest in the H600 group and in patients without more severe pain, radiation or neurological deficit. Patients with more pain tended to use more tramadol, but even severe and unbearable pain would not guarantee that tramadol would be used at all, and certainly not to the maximum permitted dose. There was no evidence for Harpagophytum-related side-effects, except possibly for mild and infrequent gastrointestinal symptoms.

Topics: Analgesics, Opioid; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycosides; Humans; Low Back Pain; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Plant Extracts; Pyrans; Tramadol

To complete a year's follow-up on patients from a 6-week double-blind pilot comparison between 44 Doloteffin patients and 44 rofecoxib patients being treated for acute exacerbations of chronic low back pain.. 38 "ex-Doloteffin" (ex-D) and 35 "ex-rofecoxib" (ex-R) received Doloteffin containing 60 mg harpagoside per day for up to 54 weeks. Pain, additional analgesics, mobility, general health and adverse events were assessed from diary records and at 6-week visits.. 53 patients remained in the follow-up at 24 weeks and 43 at 54 weeks. There was never any convincing difference between ex-D and ex-R patients in the number of patients remaining in follow-up, diary pain scores, additional analgesics, Arhus Index and health assessment questionnaire scores (HAQ). Individual fluctuations notwithstanding, the follow-up showed a slight overall improvement on the improvements in Arhus and HAQ scores achieved in the pilot study (MANOVA p = 0.016). Of the 21761 patient-days, the respective percentages with no, mild, moderate, severe and excruciating pain were 28%, 39%, 22%, 8.5% and 1.5%, respectively. Few patients requested additional treatments for their pain. Three patients suffered from minor adverse drug reactions.. Long-term treatment with Doloteffin was well tolerated. Ex-R and ex-D patients behaved similarly during the follow-up.

Topics: Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycosides; Harpagophytum; Humans; Lactones; Low Back Pain; Male; Middle Aged; Pain Measurement; Phytotherapy; Pilot Projects; Plant Extracts; Pyrans; Sulfones; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome