Page last updated: 2024-10-28

haloperidol and Incipient Schizophrenia

haloperidol has been researched along with Incipient Schizophrenia in 13 studies

Haloperidol: A phenyl-piperidinyl-butyrophenone that is used primarily to treat SCHIZOPHRENIA and other PSYCHOSES. It is also used in schizoaffective disorder, DELUSIONAL DISORDERS, ballism, and TOURETTE SYNDROME (a drug of choice) and occasionally as adjunctive therapy in INTELLECTUAL DISABILITY and the chorea of HUNTINGTON DISEASE. It is a potent antiemetic and is used in the treatment of intractable HICCUPS. (From AMA Drug Evaluations Annual, 1994, p279)
haloperidol : A compound composed of a central piperidine structure with hydroxy and p-chlorophenyl substituents at position 4 and an N-linked p-fluorobutyrophenone moiety.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Patients with an index diagnosis of schizophrenia were compared to patients with an index diagnosis of schizophreniform disorder to determine if they differed in latency to therapeutic response to haloperidol."5.07Heterogeneity of schizophrenia: relationship to latency of neuroleptic response. ( Garver, DL; McDermott, BE; Sautter, FJ, 1991)
"Haloperidol was superior to both amitriptyline and placebo on a composite measure of overall symptom severity, with no difference between amitriptyline and placebo."2.66Progress in pharmacotherapy of borderline disorders. A double-blind study of amitriptyline, haloperidol, and placebo. ( George, A; Nathan, RS; Perel, JM; Schulz, PM; Soloff, PH; Ulrich, RF, 1986)
"Schizophrenia is a neurodevelopmental disorder associated with persistent symptomatology, severe functional disability, and residual morbidity characteristic of neurodegenerative brain diseases."1.34Neuroprotection: a therapeutic strategy to prevent deterioration associated with schizophrenia. ( Jarskog, LF; Lieberman, JA; Perkins, DO, 2007)

Research

Studies (13)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19907 (53.85)18.7374
1990's1 (7.69)18.2507
2000's3 (23.08)29.6817
2010's2 (15.38)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ouhaz, Z1
Ba-M'hamed, S1
Bennis, M1
Gaebel, W1
Riesbeck, M1
Wölwer, W1
Klimke, A1
Eickhoff, M1
von Wilmsdorff, M1
Lemke, M1
Heuser, I1
Maier, W1
Huff, W1
Schmitt, A1
Sauer, H1
Riedel, M1
Klingberg, S1
Köpcke, W1
Ohmann, C1
Möller, HJ1
Kopp, B1
Wolff, M1
Hruska, C1
Reischies, FM1
Crespo-Facorro, B1
Pelayo-Terán, JM1
Pérez-Iglesias, R1
Ramírez-Bonilla, M1
Martínez-García, O1
Pardo-García, G1
Vázquez-Barquero, JL1
Lieberman, JA1
Perkins, DO1
Jarskog, LF1
Serban, G1
Siegel, S1
Steiner, M1
Elizur, A1
Davidson, S1
McDermott, BE1
Sautter, FJ1
Garver, DL1
Soloff, PH3
George, A3
Nathan, S2
Schulz, PM3
Cornelius, JR1
Herring, J1
Perel, JM3
Gunderson, JG1
Nathan, RS1
Ulrich, RF2
Rockland, LH1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Maintenance Treatment vs. Stepwise Drug Discontinuation After One Year of Maintenance Treatment in First-Episode Schizophrenia[NCT00159120]Phase 471 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2001-11-30Completed
Risk of Breakthrough Symptoms On Antipsychotic Maintenance Medication When Remitted Patients Are Treated With Long-Acting Injectable Medications[NCT05473741]180 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-01-09Recruiting
A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Brexpiprazole in the Treatment of Borderline Personality Disorder.[NCT03418675]Phase 280 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-11-26Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

A clinician-administered assessment of anxiety that will be assessed at all study visits (Visit 1-Visit 8). Changes in scores from baseline to final visit will be assessed. Higher scores (up to 56) indicate higher levels of anxiety, with 0 being no symptoms of anxiety. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to Week 12) is reported

Interventionchange in score on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.41
Rexulti-4.88

Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D)

A clinician-administered assessment of depression that will be assessed at all study visits (Visits 1-8). Higher total scores indicate higher levels of depression (up to 52), while a score of 0 would indicate no depressive symptoms. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to week 12) is reported

Interventionchange in score on a scale (Mean)
Placebo-2.09
Rexulti-3.81

Barratt Impulsiveness Scale (BIS)

A self-report assessment of impulsivity that will be assessed at baseline and visit 8. The BIS is composed of 30 items describing common impulsive or non-impulsive (for reverse scored items) behaviors and preferences. Items are scored on a 4-point scale: (Rarely/Never = 1, Occasionally = 2, Often = 3, Almost Always/Always = 4). These scores are summed to produce an overall impulsivity score ranging from 30 (not impulsive) to 120 (extremely impulsive). (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 8
Placebo76.5368.13
Rexulti72.2770.5

Borderline Evaluation of Severity Over Time (BEST)

A self rated scale used to measure severity and change. The first 12 items of the scale are on a scale from 1-5, with 5 meaning that the item caused extreme distress, severe difficulties in relationships, and/or kept them from getting things done. The lowest rating (1) means it caused little or no problems. Items 13-15 (positive behaviors) are rated according to frequency. Completed at every visit. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Assessed at Visits 1 to 8, change in scores from Visit 1 to Visit 8 (baseline to week 12) is reported

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 8
Placebo40.9029.15
Rexulti40.5423.15

Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (CSSRS)

"A self-report scale measuring suicidality. Subjects will complete the scale at all visits. Subjects are asked about suicidal thoughts. If answers are no, rater can proceed to suicidal behavior section where subject is asked about any non-suicidal self injurious behavior. If yes, subject is asked about intensity of ideations. In the event of serious threat to themselves, the subject will be escorted to the emergency room. Total score indicates severity of suicidal ideation and behavior, with lower scores representing lower levels of suicidality and higher scores representing higher levels of suicidality. A score of 0 would reflect no suicidality present, whereas a maximum score of 5 would reflect active suicidal ideation with intent to act." (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 8
Placebo1.150.23
Rexulti0.730.08

MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview

A short-structured interview that assesses comorbid psychiatric disorders according to the DSM 5 criteria. This assessment will be done during the baseline visit. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Major Depressive Episode (Current)Major Depressive Episode (Past)Manic Episode (Current)Manic Episode (Past)Hypomanic Episode (Current)Bipolar I Disorder (Current)Bipolar I Disorder (Past)Bipolar II Disorder (Current)Bipolar II Disorder (Past)Panic Disorder (Current)Panic Disorder (Lifetime)Agoraphobia (Current)Social Anxiety Disorder (Current)Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (Current)Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (Current)Alcohol Use Disorder (Past 12 months)Substance Use Disorder (Past 12 months)Any Psychotic Disorder (Current)Any Psychotic Disorder (Lifetime)Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features (Current)Major Depressive Disorder with Psychotic Features (Past)Anorexia Nervosa (current)Bulimia Nervosa (Current)Binge Eating Disorder (Current)Generalized Anxiety Disorder (Current)Antisocial Personality Disorder (Lifetime)ADHD Combined Type (Current)ADHD Inattentive Type (Current)ADHD Hyperactive Type (Current)Tourette's Syndrome (Lifetime)Persistent Motor Tic Disorder (Lifetime)Provisional Vocal Tic Disorder (Lifetime)Provisional Tic Disorder (Lifetime)Specific PhobiaBody Dysmorphic Disorder (Current)
Placebo16122110000611763913110000042108201010043
Rexulti1818230000161099312880100144154411110012

Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI)

A self-report assessment of patient perceived quality of life that will be assessed at baseline and visit 8. Higher scores indicate a higher quality of life, whereas lower scores indicate a lower quality of life. Participants are asked to rate the importance of each domain on a 3-point scale ranging from 1=not important to 3=very important, and to rate how satisfied they are with that domain on a 6-point scale, ranging from -3=very dissatisfied to +3=very satisfied. In scoring, importance ratings are multiplied by satisfaction ratings to produce weighted satisfaction scores for each of the 16 domains. Weighted satisfaction scores are summed and divided by the number of domains that were rated as important or very important to produce a raw score, which is then converted to a t-score, which provides a proxy measurement for perceived quality of life. T-scores range from very low perceived quality of life (0-36) to high perceived quality of life (58-77). (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Week 1), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 8
Placebo28.8930.75
Rexulti28.7035.71

Self Report Version of Zanarini Scale

A self-report scale assessing Borderline Personality severity that will be assessed at all visits.This scale is assessing severity and change in BPD symptoms. This is a 9-item scale measuring severity of different aspects of Borderline Personality Disorder, with each item rated on a 0-4 scale, 0=no symptoms, 4=severe symptoms. Total scores range from 0-36. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 2Visit 3Visit 4Visit 5Visit 6Visit 7Visit 8
Placebo18.212.810.710.79.79.68.79.3
Rexulti17.610.97.98.07.06.66.05.8

Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS)

Subjects will complete the SDS at all visits. The change in scores from baseline to study completion will be assessed. The scale itself assesses the level of disability from borderline personality disorder (or target disorder) with higher scores indicating a more debilitating disorder. Scores range from 0-30. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 2Visit 3Visit 4Visit 5Visit 6Visit 7Visit 8
Placebo17.313.311.512.411.711.212.012.7
Rexulti15.810.77.87.87.07.96.97.7

Symptom Checklist-90 Revised

An instrument that helps evaluate a broad range of psychological problems and symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder psychopathology. This will be assessed at baseline and visit 8.The 115 items are rated by using a 5-step Likert scale (0=not at all, 4=very strong) and provide a global picture of borderline psychopathology. Global scores of borderline psychopathology are calculated by summing 12 items and range from 0-48. Higher scores indicate more severe symptoms of Borderline Personality Disorder. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline, Visit 8 (Week 12)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 8
Placebo26.1720.25
Rexulti25.4214.21

Zanarini Rating Scale for Borderline Personality Disorder

A clinician-administered scale assessing Borderline Personality Scale severity at all study visits. Scores range from 0-36. Higher scores represent worse Borderline Personality Disorder severity, and lower scores represent milder Borderline Personality Disorder severity. (NCT03418675)
Timeframe: Baseline (Visit 1), Week 1 (Visit 2), Week 2 (Visit 3), Week 4 (Visit 4), Week 6 (Visit 5), Week 8 (Visit 6), Week 10 (Visit 7), Week 12 (Visit 8)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Visit 1Visit 2Visit 3Visit 4Visit 5Visit 6Visit 7Visit 8
Placebo14.97.64.764.25.758.4
Rexulti14.96.75.34.44.54.943.1

Trials

10 trials available for haloperidol and Incipient Schizophrenia

ArticleYear
Relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia--maintenance vs intermittent drug treatment with prodrome-based early intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2011, Volume: 72, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therapy;

2011
Relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia--maintenance vs intermittent drug treatment with prodrome-based early intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2011, Volume: 72, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therapy;

2011
Relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia--maintenance vs intermittent drug treatment with prodrome-based early intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2011, Volume: 72, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therapy;

2011
Relapse prevention in first-episode schizophrenia--maintenance vs intermittent drug treatment with prodrome-based early intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial within the German Research Network on Schizophrenia.
    The Journal of clinical psychiatry, 2011, Volume: 72, Issue:2

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Cognitive Behavioral Therapy; Combined Modality Therapy;

2011
Brain mechanisms of visual encoding and working memory in psychometrically identified schizotypal individuals and after acute administration of haloperidol.
    Psychophysiology, 2002, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Brain; Cues; Electroencephalography; Evoked Potentials; Female; Haloper

2002
Predictors of acute treatment response in patients with a first episode of non-affective psychosis: sociodemographics, premorbid and clinical variables.
    Journal of psychiatric research, 2007, Volume: 41, Issue:8

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Antipsychotic Agents; Benzodiazepines; Comorbidity; F

2007
Response of borderline and schizotypal patients to small doses of thiothixene and haloperidol.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1984, Volume: 141, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Borderline Personality Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follo

1984
Heterogeneity of schizophrenia: relationship to latency of neuroleptic response.
    Psychiatry research, 1991, Volume: 37, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol; Hospitalization; Humans; Longitudinal Studies; Psychiatric St

1991
Amitriptyline versus haloperidol in borderlines: final outcomes and predictors of response.
    Journal of clinical psychopharmacology, 1989, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Amitriptyline; Borderline Personality Disorder; Depressive Disorder; Follow-Up Studies; Haloperidol;

1989
Pharmacotherapy for patients with borderline personality disorder.
    Archives of general psychiatry, 1986, Volume: 43, Issue:7

    Topics: Amitriptyline; Antipsychotic Agents; Borderline Personality Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Doub

1986
Progress in pharmacotherapy of borderline disorders. A double-blind study of amitriptyline, haloperidol, and placebo.
    Archives of general psychiatry, 1986, Volume: 43, Issue:7

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amitriptyline; Borderline Personality Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Double-

1986
Amitriptyline and haloperidol in unstable and schizotypal borderline disorders.
    Psychopharmacology bulletin, 1986, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Amitriptyline; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Middl

1986
Effect of tranquilizers on borderline and schizotypal patients questioned.
    The American journal of psychiatry, 1985, Volume: 142, Issue:5

    Topics: Borderline Personality Disorder; Clinical Trials as Topic; Haloperidol; Humans; Personality Disorder

1985

Other Studies

3 other studies available for haloperidol and Incipient Schizophrenia

ArticleYear
Haloperidol treatment at pre-exposure phase reduces the disturbance of latent inhibition in rats with neonatal ventral hippocampus lesions.
    Comptes rendus biologies, 2014, Volume: 337, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Animals, Newborn; Antipsychotic Agents; Behavior, Animal; Conditioning, Psychological; Dise

2014
Neuroprotection: a therapeutic strategy to prevent deterioration associated with schizophrenia.
    CNS spectrums, 2007, Volume: 12, Issue:3 Suppl 4

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Atrophy; Benzodiazepines; Cerebral Cortex; Child; Cognition

2007
Behavioral toxicity. Neuroleptic-induced paradoxical behavioral toxicity in young borderline schizoprenics.
    Confinia psychiatrica. Borderland of psychiatry. Grenzgebiete der Psychiatrie. Les Confins de la psychiatrie, 1979, Volume: 22, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Antipsychotic Agents; Chlorpromazine; Female; Haloperidol; Humans; Male; Mental Disorders; Pe

1979