guanosine-triphosphate and Adenocarcinoma-of-Lung

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is the most common posttranscriptional editing to create somatic mutations and increase proteomic diversity. However, the functions of the edited mutations are largely underexplored. To identify novel targets in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), we conducted a genome-wide somatic A-to-I RNA editing analysis of 23 paired adjacent normal and LUAD transcriptomes and identified 26,280 events, including known nonsynonymous AZIN1-S367G and novel RHOAiso2 (RHOA isoform 2)-R176G, tubulin gamma complex associated protein 2 (TUBGCP2)-N211S, and RBMXL1-I40 M mutations. We validated the edited mutations in silico in multiple databases and in newly collected LUAD tissue pairs with the SEQUENOM MassARRAY® and TaqMan PCR Systems. We selected RHOAiso2-R176G due to its significant level, isoform-specificity, and being the most common somatic edited nonsynonymous mutation of RHOAiso2 to investigate its roles in LUAD tumorigenesis. RHOAiso2 is a ubiquitous but low-expression alternative spliced isoform received a unique Alu-rich exon at the 3' RHOA mRNA to become an editing RNA target, leading to somatic hypermutation and protein diversity. Interestingly, LUAD patients harboring the RHOAiso2-R176G mutation were associated with aberrant RHOA functions, cancer cell proliferation and migration, and poor clinical outcomes in transcriptome analysis. Mechanistically, RHOAiso2-R176G mutation-expressing LUAD cells potentiate RHOA-guanosine triphosphate (GTP) activity to phosphorylate ROCK1/2 effectors and enhance cell proliferation and migration in vitro and increase tumor growth in xenograft and systemic metastasis models in vivo. Taken together, the RHOAiso2-R176G mutation is a common somatic A-to-I edited mutation of the hypermutated RHOA isoform 2. It is an oncogenic and isoform-specific theranostic target that activates RHOA-GTP/p-ROCK1/2 signaling to promote tumor progression.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Adenosine; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic; Guanosine Triphosphate; Humans; Inosine; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation; Protein Isoforms; Proteomics; rhoA GTP-Binding Protein; RNA

It is thought that KRAS oncoproteins are constitutively active because their guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase) activity is disabled. Consequently, drugs targeting the inactive or guanosine 5'-diphosphate-bound conformation are not expected to be effective. We describe a mechanism that enables such drugs to inhibit KRAS(G12C) signaling and cancer cell growth. Inhibition requires intact GTPase activity and occurs because drug-bound KRAS(G12C) is insusceptible to nucleotide exchange factors and thus trapped in its inactive state. Indeed, mutants completely lacking GTPase activity and those promoting exchange reduced the potency of the drug. Suppressing nucleotide exchange activity downstream of various tyrosine kinases enhanced KRAS(G12C) inhibition, whereas its potentiation had the opposite effect. These findings reveal that KRAS(G12C) undergoes nucleotide cycling in cancer cells and provide a basis for developing effective therapies to treat KRAS(G12C)-driven cancers.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Alleles; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Cell Line, Tumor; Cysteine; Cytidine Diphosphate; Enzyme Inhibitors; Glycine; Guanosine Triphosphate; HEK293 Cells; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Mutation; Piperazines; Protein Conformation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras); Time Factors

RAS-like protein expressed in many tissues 1 (RIT1) is a disease-associated RAS subfamily small guanosine triphosphatase (GTPase). Recent studies revealed that germ-line and somatic RIT1 mutations can cause Noonan syndrome (NS), and drive proliferation of lung adenocarcinomas, respectively, akin to RAS mutations in these diseases. However, the locations of these RIT1 mutations differ significantly from those found in RAS, and do not affect the three mutational "hot spots" of RAS. Moreover, few studies have characterized the GTPase cycle of RIT1 and its disease-associated mutants. Here we developed a real-time NMR-based GTPase assay for RIT1 and investigated the effect of disease-associated mutations on GTPase cycle. RIT1 exhibits an intrinsic GTP hydrolysis rate similar to that of H-RAS, but its intrinsic nucleotide exchange rate is ∼4-fold faster, likely as a result of divergent residues near the nucleotide binding site. All of the disease-associated mutations investigated increased the GTP-loaded, activated state of RIT1 in vitro, but they could be classified into two groups with different intrinsic GTPase properties. The S35T, A57G, and Y89H mutants exhibited more rapid nucleotide exchange, whereas F82V and T83P impaired GTP hydrolysis. A RAS-binding domain pulldown assay indicated that RIT1 A57G and Y89H were highly activated in HEK293T cells, whereas T83P and F82V exhibited more modest activation. All five mutations are associated with NS, whereas two (A57G and F82V) have also been identified in urinary tract cancers and myeloid malignancies. Characterization of the effects on the GTPase cycle of RIT1 disease-associated mutations should enable better understanding of their role in disease processes.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adenocarcinoma of Lung; Amino Acid Substitution; Cell Line; Guanosine Triphosphate; Humans; Hydrolysis; Lung Neoplasms; Mutation, Missense; Neoplasm Proteins; Noonan Syndrome; Protein Domains; ras Proteins; Urologic Neoplasms