guanosine-5--o-(3-thiotriphosphate) and Peripheral-Nerve-Injuries

Neuropathic pain alters opioid self-administration in rats. The brain regions altered in the presence of neuropathic pain mediating these differences have not been identified, but likely involve ascending pain pathways interacting with the limbic system. The amygdala is a brain region that integrates noxious stimulation with limbic activity.. μ-Opioid receptors were blocked in the amygdala using the irreversible antagonist, β-funaltrexamine, and the antiallodynic and reinforcing effects of heroin were determined in spinal nerve-ligated rats. In addition, the effect of β-funaltrexamine was determined on heroin self-administration in sham-operated rats.. β-Funaltrexamine decreased functional activity of μ-opioid receptors by 60 ± 5% (mean ± SD). Irreversible inhibition of μ-opioid receptors in the amygdala significantly attenuated the ability of doses of heroin up to 100 μg/kg to reverse hypersensitivity after spinal nerve ligation. Heroin intake by self-administration in spinal nerve-ligated rats was increased from 5.0 ± 0.3 to 9.9 ± 2.1 infusions/h after administration of 2.5 nmol of β-funaltrexamine in the lateral amygdala, while having no effect in sham-operated animals (5.8 ± 1.6 before, 6.7 ± 0.9 after). The antiallodynic effects of 60 μg/kg heroin were decreased up to 4 days, but self-administration was affected for up to 14 days.. μ-Opioid receptors in the lateral amygdala partially meditate heroin's antiallodynic effects and self-administration after peripheral nerve injury. The lack of effect of β-funaltrexamine on heroin self-administration in sham-operated subjects suggests that opioids maintain self-administration through a distinct mechanism in the presence of pain.

Topics: Amygdala; Analgesics, Opioid; Animals; Behavior, Animal; Brain; Conditioning, Operant; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Heroin; Hyperalgesia; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Naltrexone; Narcotic Antagonists; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Rats; Rats, Inbred F344; Reinforcement, Psychology; Self Administration; Spinal Nerves

Loss of GABA-mediated inhibition in the spinal cord is thought to mediate allodynia and spontaneous pain after nerve injury. Despite extensive investigation of GABA itself, relatively little is known about how nerve injury alters the receptors at which GABA acts. This study examined levels of GABA(B) receptor protein in the spinal cord dorsal horn, and in the L4 and L5 (lumbar designations) dorsal root ganglia one to 18 weeks after L5 spinal nerve ligation. Mechanical allodynia was maximal by 1 week and persisted at blunted levels for at least 18 weeks after injury. Spontaneous pain behaviors were evident for 6 weeks. Western blotting of dorsal horn detected two isoforms of the GABA(B(1)) subunit and a single GABA(B(2)) subunit. High levels of GABA(B(1a)) and low levels of GABA(B(1b)) protein were present in the dorsal root ganglia. However, GABA(B(2)) protein was not detected in the dorsal root ganglia, consistent with the proposed existence of an atypical receptor composed of GABA(B(1)) homodimers. The levels of GABA(B(1a)), GABA(B(1b)), and GABA(B(2)) protein in the ipsilateral dorsal horn were unchanged at any time after injury. Immunohistochemical staining also did not detect a change in GABA(B(1)) or GABA(B(2)) subunits in dorsal horn segments having a robust loss of isolectin B4 staining. The levels of GABA(B(1a)) protein were also unchanged in the L4 or L5 dorsal root ganglia at any time after spinal nerve ligation. Levels of GABA(B(2)) remained undetectable. Finally, baclofen-stimulated binding of guanosine-5'-(gamma-O-thio)triphosphate in dorsal horn did not differ between sham and ligated rats. Collectively, these results argue that a loss of GABA(B) receptor-mediated inhibition, particularly of central terminals of primary afferents, is unlikely to mediate the development or maintenance of allodynia or spontaneous pain behaviors after spinal nerve injury.

Topics: Animals; Baclofen; Denervation; Disease Models, Animal; GABA Agonists; gamma-Aminobutyric Acid; Ganglia, Spinal; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Hyperalgesia; Ligation; Male; Neural Inhibition; Neuralgia; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Peripheral Nerves; Peripheral Nervous System Diseases; Posterior Horn Cells; Presynaptic Terminals; Protein Subunits; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, GABA-B; Synaptic Transmission; Up-Regulation

Previous studies in rats have shown that spinal morphine loses potency and efficacy to suppress an acute nociceptive stimulus applied to the tail or the paw following injury to peripheral nerves by tight ligation of the L5/L6 spinal nerves. Additionally, intrathecal (i.th.) morphine is ineffective in suppressing tactile allodynia at fully antinociceptive doses in these animals. The molecular basis for this loss of morphine potency and efficacy in nerve injury states is not known. One possible explanation for this phenomenon is a generalized, multi-segmental loss of opioid mu (mu) receptors in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord after nerve injury. This hypothesis was tested here by determining whether nerve injury produces (a) a decrease in mu receptors in the lumbar spinal cord; (b) a decrease in the affinity of ligand-receptor interaction, (c) a decrease in the fraction of high-affinity state of the mu receptors and (d) a reduced ability of morphine to activate G-proteins via mu receptors. Lumbar spinal cord tissues were examined 7 days after the nerve injury, a time when stable allodynia was observed. At this point, no differences were observed in the receptor density or affinity of [3H]DAMGO (mu selective agonist) or [3H]CTAP (mu selective antagonist) in the dorsal quadrant of lumbar spinal cord ipsilateral to nerve injury. Additionally, no change in morphine's potency and efficacy in activating G-proteins was observed. In contrast, staining for mu opioid receptors using mu-selective antibodies revealed a discrete loss of mu opioid receptors localized ipsilateral to the nerve injury and specific for sections taken at the L6 level. At these spinal segments, mu opioid receptors were decreased in laminae I and II. The data indicate that the loss of mu opioid receptors are highly localized and may contribute to the loss of morphine activity involving input at these spinal segments (e.g., foot-flick response). On the other hand, the lack of a generalized loss of opioid mu receptors across spinal segments makes it unlikely that this is the primary cause for the loss of potency and efficacy of mu opioids to suppress multi-segmental reflexes, such as the tail-flick response.

Topics: Animals; Binding, Competitive; Enkephalin, Ala(2)-MePhe(4)-Gly(5)-; Enkephalins; GTP-Binding Proteins; Guanosine 5'-O-(3-Thiotriphosphate); Male; Morphine; Narcotic Antagonists; Narcotics; Nociceptors; Pain; Peptide Fragments; Peptides; Peripheral Nerve Injuries; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Receptors, Opioid, mu; Somatostatin; Spinal Cord; Tritium