glycine has been researched along with Multiple Myeloma in 162 studies
Multiple Myeloma: A malignancy of mature PLASMA CELLS engaging in monoclonal immunoglobulin production. It is characterized by hyperglobulinemia, excess Bence-Jones proteins (free monoclonal IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAINS) in the urine, skeletal destruction, bone pain, and fractures. Other features include ANEMIA; HYPERCALCEMIA; and RENAL INSUFFICIENCY.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma." | 9.51 | A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Chou, T; Fukunaga, S; Iida, S; Ikeda, T; Izumi, T; Komeno, T; Sasaki, M; Sugiura, K; Terui, Y, 2022) |
"Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide." | 9.51 | Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial. ( Darif, M; Demarquette, H; Dimopoulos, MA; Doronin, V; Du, J; Fenk, R; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Lee, C; Leleu, X; Levin, MD; Mellqvist, UH; Montes, YG; Pompa, A; Quach, H; Ramasamy, K; Sati, H; Schjesvold, F; Vinogradova, O; Vorog, A, 2022) |
"Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and is often used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone." | 9.51 | Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis. ( Bergsagel, PL; Bradt, EE; Buadi, FK; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonder, A; Gertz, MA; Go, RS; Gonsalves, W; Hayman, SR; Helgeson, DK; Hobbs, M; Hwa, YL; Kapoor, P; Kourelis, TV; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, BR; Larsen, JT; Leung, N; Muchtar, E; O'Brien, P; Rajkumar, SV; Siddiqui, M; Warsame, R, 2022) |
"Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (IXA) in bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma (MM) and synergy with immunomodulatory drugs." | 9.41 | A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202). ( Bova-Solem, M; Carlisle, D; Efebera, YA; Hassoun, H; Laubach, JP; McCarthy, PL; Mulkey, F; Richardson, PG; Santo, K; Suman, VJ; Tuchman, SA; Voorhees, PM, 2021) |
"Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients." | 9.41 | Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Benboubker, L; Facon, T; Karlin, L; Kumar, SK; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Offner, F; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Rifkin, RM; Rigaudeau, S; Rodon, P; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Twumasi-Ankrah, P; Venner, CP; Voog, E; White, DJ; Yoon, SS; Yung, G; Zhang, X, 2021) |
"The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study (NCT02181413) demonstrated improved progression-free survival with ixazomib maintenance versus placebo post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients." | 9.34 | Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma. ( Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020) |
"Ixazomib-revlimid-dexamethason showed significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 9.30 | Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Petzer, A; Poenisch, W; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2019) |
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing transplantation." | 9.30 | Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies. ( Berg, D; Byrne, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Echeveste Gutierrez, MA; Grzasko, N; Hofmeister, CC; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Laubach, JP; Liu, G; Lu, V; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H, 2019) |
"The aim of this analysis was to assess healthcare resource utilization in the pivotal phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 9.27 | Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Hari, P; Lin, HM; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Zhu, Y, 2018) |
"Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients." | 9.27 | Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bacco, AD; Baz, R; Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Byrne, C; Chari, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hofmeister, CC; Htut, M; Lebovic, D; Liao, E; Liedtke, M; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Rosenbaum, CA; Smith, SD; Vesole, DH, 2018) |
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is approved in the United States, European Union and other countries, in combination with oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy." | 9.24 | Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Avivi, I; Berg, D; Einsele, H; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hájek, R; Hari, P; Kumar, S; Liberati, AM; Lin, J; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Masszi, T; Mateos, MV; Minnema, MC; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Romeril, K; Shustik, C; Spencer, A, 2017) |
"The China Continuation study was a separate regional expansion of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following one to three prior therapies." | 9.24 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study. ( Chen, X; Du, X; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hou, J; Hua, Z; Jin, J; Ke, X; Li, H; Li, J; Liu, J; Lu, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; van de Velde, H; Wang, B; Wang, H; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, D, 2017) |
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib has been approved by regulatory authorities around the world, including in the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study." | 9.24 | Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses. ( Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Kumar, S; Liu, R; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, S, 2017) |
"We report the first clinical investigation conducted in Japan to confirm the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ixazomib alone and combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma." | 9.24 | Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chou, T; Handa, H; Ishizawa, K; Kase, Y; Suzuki, K; Takubo, T, 2017) |
"In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group)." | 9.22 | Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Baker, BW; Berg, DT; Buadi, FK; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Ganly, P; Garderet, L; Gimsing, P; Grzasko, N; Hansson, M; Hui, AM; Jackson, SR; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Lin, J; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Palumbo, A; Pour, L; Richardson, PG; Sandhu, I; Simpson, DR; Stoppa, AM; Touzeau, C; van de Velde, H, 2016) |
"The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma." | 9.19 | Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014) |
"We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on the association between occupational exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM)." | 9.05 | Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis. ( Boffetta, P; Ciocan, C; Donato, F; Pira, E, 2020) |
"Ixazomib is a new, orally administered, reversible proteasome inhibitor which is under investigation for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM)." | 9.01 | Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders. ( Rydygier, D; Smolewski, P, 2019) |
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of carfilzomib-/ixazomib-containing combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 8.98 | Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Guo, H; Sun, X; Wang, B; Xu, W, 2018) |
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor used in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA-LEN-DEX) and licensed for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma." | 8.98 | Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. ( Armoiry, X; Clarke, A; Connock, M; Cummins, E; Melendez-Torres, GJ; Royle, P; Tsertsvadze, A, 2018) |
"Knockdown of LINC00461 enhanced the therapeutic effects of ixazomib against multiple myeloma in part by the regulation of SNRPB2." | 8.31 | LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells. ( Deng, M; Liu, S; Peng, H; Wang, Z; Xiao, H; Xiao, X; Yuan, H; Zhang, G, 2023) |
"Ixazomib is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received at least one previous therapy." | 8.12 | Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chudej, J; Guman, T; Hlebaskova, M; Kucerikova, M; Sokol, J; Stasko, J; Stecova, N; Valekova, L, 2022) |
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance." | 8.12 | Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022) |
"Maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) can improve outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, however, the neurotoxicity and parenteral route of bortezomib limit its long-term use." | 8.12 | Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study. ( Fan, S; Huang, Z; Li, X; Shen, M; Tang, R; Wang, Y; Zhan, X; Zhang, J; Zhong, Y, 2022) |
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of total oral regimen containing ixazomib in multidrug-resistant relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)." | 8.12 | [Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma]. ( Fu, CC; Jin, S; Shang, JJ; Wang, J; Wu, DP; Yan, Z; Yao, Y, 2022) |
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)." | 8.12 | Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients. ( Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022) |
"Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively." | 8.02 | Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime ( Alizadeh, H; Demeter, J; Hardi, A; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Masszi, T; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2021) |
"We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice." | 8.02 | Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice. ( Bacovsky, J; Brozova, L; Capkova, L; Hajek, R; Heindorfer, A; Jelinek, T; Jindra, P; Jungova, A; Kessler, P; Krhovska, P; Machalkova, K; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Mistrik, M; Pavlicek, P; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Pour, L; Radocha, J; Skacel, T; Spicka, I; Stejskal, L; Stork, M; Straub, J; Sykora, M; Ullrychova, J, 2021) |
"This study aimed to investigate real-world data of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 8.02 | Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis. ( Adachi, Y; Fuchida, SI; Hanamoto, H; Hino, M; Imada, K; Kanakura, Y; Kanda, J; Kaneko, H; Kosugi, S; Kuroda, J; Matsuda, M; Matsumura, I; Nakaya, A; Nomura, S; Ohta, K; Onda, Y; Shibayama, H; Shimazaki, C; Shimazu, Y; Shimura, Y; Takakuwa, T; Takaori-Kondo, A; Tanaka, H; Uchiyama, H; Uoshima, N; Yagi, H; Yamamura, R; Yoshihara, S, 2021) |
"Lenalidomide is an important component of initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, either as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as first-line therapy with dexamethasone for patients' ineligible for ASCT (non-ASCT)." | 8.02 | Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada. ( Aslam, M; Atenafu, EG; Cherniawsky, H; Gul, E; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Kotb, R; LeBlanc, R; Louzada, ML; Masih-Khan, E; McCurdy, A; Reece, DE; Reiman, A; Sebag, M; Song, K; Stakiw, J; Venner, CP; White, D, 2021) |
"This trial evaluated quality of life (QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 instruments in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during induction and maintenance therapy with eight cycles of ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, followed by 12 months of ixazomib maintenance therapy." | 7.96 | Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Hinke, A; Jelinek, T; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Meckl, A; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Nolte, S; Petzer, A; Pönisch, W; Pour, L; Rumpold, H; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2020) |
"Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone." | 7.96 | Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study. ( Avivi, I; Chubar, E; Cohen, YC; Gatt, ME; Horowitz, N; Kreiniz, N; Lavi, N; Magen, H; Rouvio, O; Shaulov, A; Shvetz, O; Tadmor, T; Trestman, S; Vitkon, R; Ziv-Baran, T, 2020) |
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma." | 7.96 | Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Chen, S; He, Y; Hu, J; Jiang, D; Zhang, K; Zhu, Y; Zou, L, 2020) |
"Over the past years, ixazomib has been increasingly explored for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 7.96 | Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Guo, SL; Li, Z; Wang, WL, 2020) |
"Objective-To investigate cystathionine β synthase (CBS)/hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to identify its effect on the proliferation of U266 cells." | 7.96 | Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis. ( Huang, B; Kuang, L; Li, J; Xiao, F; Zhang, M; Zheng, D, 2020) |
"US community sites are enrolling non-transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with no evidence of progressive disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based therapy to receive IRd (up to 39 cycles or until progression or toxicity)." | 7.96 | Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib. ( Aiello, J; Birhiray, RE; Boccia, R; Bogard, K; Charu, V; Cherepanov, D; Demers, B; Ferrari, RH; Girnius, S; Jhangiani, HS; Kambhampati, S; Lu, V; Lyons, R; Manda, S; Noga, SJ; Rifkin, RM; Whidden, P; Yasenchak, CA; Yimer, HA, 2020) |
"Ixazomib-Revlimid-Dexamethasone is an all-oral treatment protocol for multiple myeloma with a manageable tolerability profile which was available through a named patient program for Hungarian patients from December 2015 to April 2017." | 7.91 | Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program. ( Alizadeh, H; Bátai, Á; Deák, B; Demeter, J; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Pető, M; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2019) |
"This study analyzed the cost utility on the use of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD), lenalidomide/dexamethasone (RD), bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) for patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (rrMM)." | 7.91 | Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Cai, H; Li, N; Liu, M; Zhang, L; Zheng, B, 2019) |
"Ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has been demonstrated to significantly improve progression-free survival(PFS)in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)." | 7.91 | [Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma]. ( Araki, T; Fujitani, Y; Miura, A; Ohta, K; Takakuwa, T; Takeoka, Y; Yamamura, R, 2019) |
" We examine the contribution of the method to the debate surrounding risk of multiple myeloma and glyphosate use and propose that its application contributes to a more balanced weighting of evidence." | 7.83 | Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. ( Burstyn, I; De Roos, AJ, 2016) |
"A previous publication of 57,311 pesticide applicators enrolled in the US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) produced disparate findings in relation to multiple myeloma risks in the period 1993-2001 and ever-use of glyphosate (32 cases of multiple myeloma in the full dataset of 54,315 applicators without adjustment for other variables: rate ratio (RR) 1." | 7.81 | Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data. ( Sorahan, T, 2015) |
"Frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, mainly because of a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity." | 7.01 | Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study. ( Bilgin, YM; de Graauw, NCHP; de Waal, EGM; Durdu-Rayman, N; Geerts, PAF; Kentos, A; Klein, SK; Levin, MD; Ludwig, I; Nasserinejad, K; Nijhof, IS; Oosterveld, M; Silbermann, MH; Soechit, S; Sohne, M; Sonneveld, P; Stege, CAM; Thielen, N; Timmers, GJ; van de Donk, NWCJ; van der Klift, M; van der Spek, E; van Kampen, RJW; Vekemans, MC; Zweegman, S, 2021) |
" Fourteen patients (9%) discontinued IRd due to adverse events/toxicity in the absence of disease progression." | 6.94 | Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Aitchison, R; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jenner, MW; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Kothari, J; Kotsopoulou, M; Maouche, N; Minarik, J; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Ramasamy, K; Terpos, E; Vallance, GD; Zomas, A, 2020) |
" In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures." | 6.94 | Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study. ( Bao, L; Chen, B; Ding, K; Fu, C; Hua, L; Huang, Y; Li, B; Li, J; Liu, P; Luo, J; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, W; Wu, G; Xia, Z; Xu, T; Yang, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhou, X, 2020) |
"Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib." | 6.94 | The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote ( Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020) |
" Weekly IRd, followed by ixazomib maintenance, was highly active with acceptable toxicity, enabling long-term administration with no evidence of cumulative toxicities." | 6.90 | Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2019) |
"Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention." | 6.82 | Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Z; Li, R; Ling, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhong, J, 2022) |
" Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between ixazomib plasma exposure (area under the curve/day; derived from individual apparent clearance values from a published population pharmacokinetic analysis) and safety/efficacy outcomes (hematologic [grade ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2] or non-hematologic [grade ≥ 2 vs ≤ 1] adverse events [AEs], and clinical benefit [≥stable disease vs progressive disease]) using phase 1 data in relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820; N = 44)." | 6.82 | Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study. ( Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016) |
" PK and adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a single 3 mg dose of ixazomib." | 6.82 | A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis. ( Badros, A; Berdeja, J; Chari, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Hui, AM; Kukreti, V; Lipe, B; Qian, M; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, X, 2016) |
"This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, in patients with myeloma who have limited prior exposure to bortezomib." | 6.80 | Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, FK; Chanan-Khan, A; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Hwa, L; Kapoor, P; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, B; Laumann, K; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Rivera, CE; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Thompson, MA; Witzig, TE, 2015) |
"Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor." | 6.79 | Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014) |
" In terms of adverse reactions, our analysis revealed higher incidences of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 7." | 6.72 | Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. ( Chen, H; Shao, C; Sun, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, C, 2021) |
"Ixazomib is a boron-containing selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor that demonstrated antimyeloma activity with excellent safety profile." | 6.58 | Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Moreau, P; Touzeau, C, 2018) |
" Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the (i) pharmacology and dosing of ixazomib, (ii) the efficacy and safety data from clinical studies, (iii) highlight the various novel combinations that have been reported, and (iv) give an overview of the ongoing studies with ixazomib." | 6.58 | Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma. ( Abeykoon, JP; Kapoor, P; Zanwar, S, 2018) |
"Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are among the backbones of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment; however, their long-term use can be limited by parenteral administration and treatment-related toxicities." | 6.58 | Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Ferrari, RH; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Lonial, S; O'Donnell, EK; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Voorhees, P; Zweegman, S, 2018) |
"Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs." | 6.53 | Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Azab, AK; Ghazarian, RN; Kusdono, HD; Luderer, MJ; Muz, B; Ou, M, 2016) |
"Ixazomib is an investigational, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor." | 6.52 | The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Anderson, KC; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2015) |
"Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug." | 5.72 | An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022) |
"TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma." | 5.51 | A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Chou, T; Fukunaga, S; Iida, S; Ikeda, T; Izumi, T; Komeno, T; Sasaki, M; Sugiura, K; Terui, Y, 2022) |
"Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide." | 5.51 | Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial. ( Darif, M; Demarquette, H; Dimopoulos, MA; Doronin, V; Du, J; Fenk, R; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Lee, C; Leleu, X; Levin, MD; Mellqvist, UH; Montes, YG; Pompa, A; Quach, H; Ramasamy, K; Sati, H; Schjesvold, F; Vinogradova, O; Vorog, A, 2022) |
"The all-oral combination of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (ICD) is well tolerated and effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM)." | 5.51 | Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results. ( Auner, HW; Brown, SR; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Kaiser, MF; Kendall, J; Meads, D; Morgan, GJ; Parrish, C; Roberts, S; Walker, K, 2022) |
"Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and is often used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone." | 5.51 | Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis. ( Bergsagel, PL; Bradt, EE; Buadi, FK; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonder, A; Gertz, MA; Go, RS; Gonsalves, W; Hayman, SR; Helgeson, DK; Hobbs, M; Hwa, YL; Kapoor, P; Kourelis, TV; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, BR; Larsen, JT; Leung, N; Muchtar, E; O'Brien, P; Rajkumar, SV; Siddiqui, M; Warsame, R, 2022) |
"Glyphosate-treated wild-type mice developed benign monoclonal gammopathy with increased serum IgG, anemia, and plasma cell presence in the spleen and bone marrow." | 5.51 | Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice. ( Deng, Q; Gong, Z; Hu, H; Li, Y; Liu, M; Lu, Z; Ma, X; Wang, L; Xu-Monette, ZY; Young, KH; Zhang, S, 2019) |
"Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (IXA) in bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma (MM) and synergy with immunomodulatory drugs." | 5.41 | A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202). ( Bova-Solem, M; Carlisle, D; Efebera, YA; Hassoun, H; Laubach, JP; McCarthy, PL; Mulkey, F; Richardson, PG; Santo, K; Suman, VJ; Tuchman, SA; Voorhees, PM, 2021) |
"Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients." | 5.41 | Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Benboubker, L; Facon, T; Karlin, L; Kumar, SK; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Offner, F; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Rifkin, RM; Rigaudeau, S; Rodon, P; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Twumasi-Ankrah, P; Venner, CP; Voog, E; White, DJ; Yoon, SS; Yung, G; Zhang, X, 2021) |
"Evaluating potential relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor gene expression patterns and mutational status was an exploratory objective of the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study (NCT01564537) of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) vs placebo-Rd in 722 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)." | 5.34 | Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation. ( Avet-Loiseau, H; Bahlis, NJ; Berg, D; Dash, AB; Di Bacco, A; Li, B; Lin, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Shen, L; Zhang, J, 2020) |
"The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study (NCT02181413) demonstrated improved progression-free survival with ixazomib maintenance versus placebo post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients." | 5.34 | Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma. ( Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020) |
"Ixazomib-revlimid-dexamethason showed significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 5.30 | Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Petzer, A; Poenisch, W; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2019) |
"Ixazomib maintenance prolongs PFS and represents an additional option for post-transplant maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma." | 5.30 | Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. ( Beksac, M; Chng, WJ; Dash, AB; Dimopoulos, MA; Gay, F; Goldschmidt, H; Gupta, N; Hajek, R; Iida, S; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Maisnar, V; Mateos, MV; Min, CK; Moreau, P; Morgan, G; Palumbo, A; Pluta, A; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Skacel, T; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; Weisel, KC; Zweegman, S, 2019) |
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing transplantation." | 5.30 | Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies. ( Berg, D; Byrne, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Echeveste Gutierrez, MA; Grzasko, N; Hofmeister, CC; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Laubach, JP; Liu, G; Lu, V; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H, 2019) |
"The aim of this analysis was to assess healthcare resource utilization in the pivotal phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 5.27 | Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Hari, P; Lin, HM; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Zhu, Y, 2018) |
"Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients." | 5.27 | Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bacco, AD; Baz, R; Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Byrne, C; Chari, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hofmeister, CC; Htut, M; Lebovic, D; Liao, E; Liedtke, M; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Rosenbaum, CA; Smith, SD; Vesole, DH, 2018) |
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is approved in the United States, European Union and other countries, in combination with oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy." | 5.24 | Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Avivi, I; Berg, D; Einsele, H; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hájek, R; Hari, P; Kumar, S; Liberati, AM; Lin, J; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Masszi, T; Mateos, MV; Minnema, MC; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Romeril, K; Shustik, C; Spencer, A, 2017) |
"The China Continuation study was a separate regional expansion of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following one to three prior therapies." | 5.24 | Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study. ( Chen, X; Du, X; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hou, J; Hua, Z; Jin, J; Ke, X; Li, H; Li, J; Liu, J; Lu, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; van de Velde, H; Wang, B; Wang, H; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, D, 2017) |
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib has been approved by regulatory authorities around the world, including in the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study." | 5.24 | Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses. ( Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Kumar, S; Liu, R; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, S, 2017) |
"We report the first clinical investigation conducted in Japan to confirm the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ixazomib alone and combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma." | 5.24 | Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chou, T; Handa, H; Ishizawa, K; Kase, Y; Suzuki, K; Takubo, T, 2017) |
"In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group)." | 5.22 | Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Baker, BW; Berg, DT; Buadi, FK; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Ganly, P; Garderet, L; Gimsing, P; Grzasko, N; Hansson, M; Hui, AM; Jackson, SR; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Lin, J; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Palumbo, A; Pour, L; Richardson, PG; Sandhu, I; Simpson, DR; Stoppa, AM; Touzeau, C; van de Velde, H, 2016) |
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is under phase 3 clinical investigation in multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone." | 5.20 | Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study. ( Chim, CS; Chng, WJ; Esseltine, DL; Goh, YT; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hui, AM; Kim, K; Lee, JH; Min, CK; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wong, RS; Yang, H, 2015) |
"The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma." | 5.19 | Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014) |
"We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on the association between occupational exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM)." | 5.05 | Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis. ( Boffetta, P; Ciocan, C; Donato, F; Pira, E, 2020) |
"With ten years of follow-up since the advent of the modern paradigm of combination induction therapy, consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant, and lenalidomide maintenance, median survival for multiple myeloma has increased to almost 50% at 10 years." | 5.05 | Maintenance therapy and need for cessation studies in multiple myeloma: Focus on the future. ( Chung, DJ; Diamond, B; Lesokhin, AM; Maclachlan, K; Ola Landgren, C, 2020) |
"Ixazomib is a new, orally administered, reversible proteasome inhibitor which is under investigation for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM)." | 5.01 | Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders. ( Rydygier, D; Smolewski, P, 2019) |
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of carfilzomib-/ixazomib-containing combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 4.98 | Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Guo, H; Sun, X; Wang, B; Xu, W, 2018) |
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor used in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA-LEN-DEX) and licensed for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma." | 4.98 | Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. ( Armoiry, X; Clarke, A; Connock, M; Cummins, E; Melendez-Torres, GJ; Royle, P; Tsertsvadze, A, 2018) |
"Since 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration approval of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has changed the management of hematologic malignancies and dramatically improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma." | 4.95 | Proteasome inhibitors: structure and function. ( Annunziata, CM; Nunes, AT, 2017) |
"This systematic review and meta-analysis rigorously examines the relationship between glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancer (LHC) including NHL, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), multiple myeloma (MM), and leukemia." | 4.93 | Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers. ( Chang, ET; Delzell, E, 2016) |
"Knockdown of LINC00461 enhanced the therapeutic effects of ixazomib against multiple myeloma in part by the regulation of SNRPB2." | 4.31 | LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells. ( Deng, M; Liu, S; Peng, H; Wang, Z; Xiao, H; Xiao, X; Yuan, H; Zhang, G, 2023) |
"Ixazomib is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received at least one previous therapy." | 4.12 | Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chudej, J; Guman, T; Hlebaskova, M; Kucerikova, M; Sokol, J; Stasko, J; Stecova, N; Valekova, L, 2022) |
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance." | 4.12 | Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022) |
"Maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) can improve outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, however, the neurotoxicity and parenteral route of bortezomib limit its long-term use." | 4.12 | Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study. ( Fan, S; Huang, Z; Li, X; Shen, M; Tang, R; Wang, Y; Zhan, X; Zhang, J; Zhong, Y, 2022) |
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of total oral regimen containing ixazomib in multidrug-resistant relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)." | 4.12 | [Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma]. ( Fu, CC; Jin, S; Shang, JJ; Wang, J; Wu, DP; Yan, Z; Yao, Y, 2022) |
"In this study, the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was evaluated on the basis of the observed benefit of lenalidomide-only maintenance in prior studies." | 4.12 | Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma. ( Bashir, Q; Feng, L; Huo, XJ; Lee, HC; Manasanch, EM; Morphey, A; Olsem, J; Orlowski, RZ; Patel, KK; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Weber, DM, 2022) |
"Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma with adverse effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rashes, and thrombocytopenia reported in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance, resulting in treatment discontinuation." | 4.12 | Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database. ( Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2022) |
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)." | 4.12 | Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients. ( Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022) |
"Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively." | 4.02 | Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime ( Alizadeh, H; Demeter, J; Hardi, A; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Masszi, T; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2021) |
"In the past decade, several new therapies have been approved for use in multiple myeloma, including the novel oral agent, ixazomib." | 4.02 | Medication use evaluation of the financial and clinical implications of ixazomib compared to bortezomib in the outpatient setting. ( Fajardo, S; Zink, KA, 2021) |
"We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice." | 4.02 | Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice. ( Bacovsky, J; Brozova, L; Capkova, L; Hajek, R; Heindorfer, A; Jelinek, T; Jindra, P; Jungova, A; Kessler, P; Krhovska, P; Machalkova, K; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Mistrik, M; Pavlicek, P; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Pour, L; Radocha, J; Skacel, T; Spicka, I; Stejskal, L; Stork, M; Straub, J; Sykora, M; Ullrychova, J, 2021) |
"This study aimed to investigate real-world data of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 4.02 | Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis. ( Adachi, Y; Fuchida, SI; Hanamoto, H; Hino, M; Imada, K; Kanakura, Y; Kanda, J; Kaneko, H; Kosugi, S; Kuroda, J; Matsuda, M; Matsumura, I; Nakaya, A; Nomura, S; Ohta, K; Onda, Y; Shibayama, H; Shimazaki, C; Shimazu, Y; Shimura, Y; Takakuwa, T; Takaori-Kondo, A; Tanaka, H; Uchiyama, H; Uoshima, N; Yagi, H; Yamamura, R; Yoshihara, S, 2021) |
"Ixazomib is a selective, effective, and reversible inhibitor of 20S proteasome and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma." | 4.02 | Ixazomib inhibits myeloma cell proliferation by targeting UBE2K. ( Chen, X; Chen, Y; Dong, Z; Huang, J; Ma, L; Su, J; Tian, L; Wang, Q; Xiao, P, 2021) |
"Lenalidomide is an important component of initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, either as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as first-line therapy with dexamethasone for patients' ineligible for ASCT (non-ASCT)." | 4.02 | Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada. ( Aslam, M; Atenafu, EG; Cherniawsky, H; Gul, E; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Kotb, R; LeBlanc, R; Louzada, ML; Masih-Khan, E; McCurdy, A; Reece, DE; Reiman, A; Sebag, M; Song, K; Stakiw, J; Venner, CP; White, D, 2021) |
"This trial evaluated quality of life (QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 instruments in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during induction and maintenance therapy with eight cycles of ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, followed by 12 months of ixazomib maintenance therapy." | 3.96 | Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Hinke, A; Jelinek, T; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Meckl, A; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Nolte, S; Petzer, A; Pönisch, W; Pour, L; Rumpold, H; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2020) |
"In the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) showed different magnitudes of progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs placebo-Rd according to number and type of prior therapies, with greater benefit seen in patients with >1 prior line of therapy or 1 prior line of therapy without stem cell transplantation (SCT)." | 3.96 | c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma. ( Avet-Loiseau, H; Badola, S; Bahlis, NJ; Berg, D; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Esseltine, DL; Ganly, P; Keats, JJ; Kumar, SK; Langer, C; Li, B; Lin, J; Luptakova, K; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Munshi, NC; Pour, L; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Shen, L; van de Velde, H; Viterbo, L; Zhang, J, 2020) |
"Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone." | 3.96 | Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study. ( Avivi, I; Chubar, E; Cohen, YC; Gatt, ME; Horowitz, N; Kreiniz, N; Lavi, N; Magen, H; Rouvio, O; Shaulov, A; Shvetz, O; Tadmor, T; Trestman, S; Vitkon, R; Ziv-Baran, T, 2020) |
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma." | 3.96 | Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Chen, S; He, Y; Hu, J; Jiang, D; Zhang, K; Zhu, Y; Zou, L, 2020) |
"Over the past years, ixazomib has been increasingly explored for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)." | 3.96 | Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Guo, SL; Li, Z; Wang, WL, 2020) |
"Objective-To investigate cystathionine β synthase (CBS)/hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to identify its effect on the proliferation of U266 cells." | 3.96 | Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis. ( Huang, B; Kuang, L; Li, J; Xiao, F; Zhang, M; Zheng, D, 2020) |
"US community sites are enrolling non-transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with no evidence of progressive disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based therapy to receive IRd (up to 39 cycles or until progression or toxicity)." | 3.96 | Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib. ( Aiello, J; Birhiray, RE; Boccia, R; Bogard, K; Charu, V; Cherepanov, D; Demers, B; Ferrari, RH; Girnius, S; Jhangiani, HS; Kambhampati, S; Lu, V; Lyons, R; Manda, S; Noga, SJ; Rifkin, RM; Whidden, P; Yasenchak, CA; Yimer, HA, 2020) |
"Ixazomib-Revlimid-Dexamethasone is an all-oral treatment protocol for multiple myeloma with a manageable tolerability profile which was available through a named patient program for Hungarian patients from December 2015 to April 2017." | 3.91 | Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program. ( Alizadeh, H; Bátai, Á; Deák, B; Demeter, J; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Pető, M; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2019) |
"Experimental data on resistance mechanisms of multiple myeloma (MM) to ixazomib (IXA), a second-generation proteasome inhibitor (PI), are currently lacking." | 3.91 | Novel cell line models to study mechanisms and overcoming strategies of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma. ( Bargou, RC; Brünnert, D; Chatterjee, M; Driessen, C; Goyal, P; Heiden, R; Kirner, S; Kraus, M; Stühmer, T, 2019) |
"This study analyzed the cost utility on the use of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD), lenalidomide/dexamethasone (RD), bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) for patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (rrMM)." | 3.91 | Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Cai, H; Li, N; Liu, M; Zhang, L; Zheng, B, 2019) |
"Ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has been demonstrated to significantly improve progression-free survival(PFS)in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)." | 3.91 | [Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma]. ( Araki, T; Fujitani, Y; Miura, A; Ohta, K; Takakuwa, T; Takeoka, Y; Yamamura, R, 2019) |
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of these novel proteasome inhibitors (PIs) (carfilzomib, ixazomib, oprozomib and marizomib) containing regimens (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM)." | 3.88 | The activity and safety of novel proteasome inhibitors strategies (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Ma, H; Su, Z; Sun, F; Zhao, N, 2018) |
"In the last few weeks, the FDA approved three new therapies for multiple myeloma: ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor; and daratumumab and elotuzumab, two monoclonal antibodies that target CD38 and SLAMF7, respectively." | 3.83 | Multiple Myeloma Gets Three New Drugs. ( Poh, A, 2016) |
" We examine the contribution of the method to the debate surrounding risk of multiple myeloma and glyphosate use and propose that its application contributes to a more balanced weighting of evidence." | 3.83 | Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. ( Burstyn, I; De Roos, AJ, 2016) |
"Data were pooled from 226 adult patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma or solid tumours in four phase 1 studies, in which ixazomib dosing (oral/intravenous, once/twice weekly) was based on BSA." | 3.81 | Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. ( Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015) |
"A previous publication of 57,311 pesticide applicators enrolled in the US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) produced disparate findings in relation to multiple myeloma risks in the period 1993-2001 and ever-use of glyphosate (32 cases of multiple myeloma in the full dataset of 54,315 applicators without adjustment for other variables: rate ratio (RR) 1." | 3.81 | Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data. ( Sorahan, T, 2015) |
"The success of bortezomib therapy for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) led to the development of structurally and pharmacologically distinct novel proteasome inhibitors." | 3.77 | In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells. ( Anderson, KC; Chauhan, D; Kuhn, D; Orlowski, R; Raje, N; Richardson, P; Tian, Z; Zhou, B, 2011) |
"Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying standard- or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) achieve similar complete response (CR) rates, but the later have inferior progression-free survival (PFS)." | 3.01 | Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma. ( Alameda, D; Alignani, D; Bargay, J; Blade, J; Burgos, L; Calasanz, MJ; Cedena, MT; Celay, J; Cordón, L; de la Rubia, J; Flores-Montero, J; Fresquet, V; Garcés, JJ; Garcia-Sanz, R; Goicoechea, I; Gutierrez, NC; Hernandez, MT; Krsnik, I; Lahuerta, JJ; Lara-Astiaso, D; Martin-Sanchez, J; Martinez-Climent, JA; Martinez-Lopez, J; Martinez-Martinez, R; Mateos, MV; Moraleda, JM; Orfao, A; Oriol, A; Paiva, B; Palomera, L; Puig, N; Ramos, MM; Rios, R; Rodriguez, I; Rodriguez, S; Rosiñol, L; San Miguel, J; Sarra, J; Sarvide, S; Vidriales, MB; Vilas-Zornoza, A, 2021) |
"Frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, mainly because of a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity." | 3.01 | Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study. ( Bilgin, YM; de Graauw, NCHP; de Waal, EGM; Durdu-Rayman, N; Geerts, PAF; Kentos, A; Klein, SK; Levin, MD; Ludwig, I; Nasserinejad, K; Nijhof, IS; Oosterveld, M; Silbermann, MH; Soechit, S; Sohne, M; Sonneveld, P; Stege, CAM; Thielen, N; Timmers, GJ; van de Donk, NWCJ; van der Klift, M; van der Spek, E; van Kampen, RJW; Vekemans, MC; Zweegman, S, 2021) |
" Fourteen patients (9%) discontinued IRd due to adverse events/toxicity in the absence of disease progression." | 2.94 | Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Aitchison, R; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jenner, MW; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Kothari, J; Kotsopoulou, M; Maouche, N; Minarik, J; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Ramasamy, K; Terpos, E; Vallance, GD; Zomas, A, 2020) |
" In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures." | 2.94 | Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study. ( Bao, L; Chen, B; Ding, K; Fu, C; Hua, L; Huang, Y; Li, B; Li, J; Liu, P; Luo, J; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, W; Wu, G; Xia, Z; Xu, T; Yang, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhou, X, 2020) |
"Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib." | 2.94 | The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote ( Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020) |
" Weekly IRd, followed by ixazomib maintenance, was highly active with acceptable toxicity, enabling long-term administration with no evidence of cumulative toxicities." | 2.90 | Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2019) |
"Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention." | 2.82 | Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Z; Li, R; Ling, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhong, J, 2022) |
" Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between ixazomib plasma exposure (area under the curve/day; derived from individual apparent clearance values from a published population pharmacokinetic analysis) and safety/efficacy outcomes (hematologic [grade ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2] or non-hematologic [grade ≥ 2 vs ≤ 1] adverse events [AEs], and clinical benefit [≥stable disease vs progressive disease]) using phase 1 data in relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820; N = 44)." | 2.82 | Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study. ( Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016) |
" PK and adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a single 3 mg dose of ixazomib." | 2.82 | A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis. ( Badros, A; Berdeja, J; Chari, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Hui, AM; Kukreti, V; Lipe, B; Qian, M; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, X, 2016) |
"This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, in patients with myeloma who have limited prior exposure to bortezomib." | 2.80 | Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, FK; Chanan-Khan, A; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Hwa, L; Kapoor, P; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, B; Laumann, K; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Rivera, CE; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Thompson, MA; Witzig, TE, 2015) |
"Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor." | 2.79 | Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014) |
" In terms of adverse reactions, our analysis revealed higher incidences of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 7." | 2.72 | Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. ( Chen, H; Shao, C; Sun, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, C, 2021) |
"Model-informed drug development (MIDD) was central to the development of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib, facilitating internal decisions (switch from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, inclusive phase III trials, portfolio prioritization of ixazomib-based combinations, phase III dose for maintenance treatment), regulatory review (model-informed QT analysis, benefit-risk of 4 mg dose), and product labeling (absolute bioavailability and intrinsic/extrinsic factors)." | 2.61 | Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor. ( Berg, D; Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Ke, A; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Patel, C; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H, 2019) |
"Ixazomib is a boron-containing selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor that demonstrated antimyeloma activity with excellent safety profile." | 2.58 | Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Moreau, P; Touzeau, C, 2018) |
" Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the (i) pharmacology and dosing of ixazomib, (ii) the efficacy and safety data from clinical studies, (iii) highlight the various novel combinations that have been reported, and (iv) give an overview of the ongoing studies with ixazomib." | 2.58 | Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma. ( Abeykoon, JP; Kapoor, P; Zanwar, S, 2018) |
"Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are among the backbones of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment; however, their long-term use can be limited by parenteral administration and treatment-related toxicities." | 2.58 | Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Ferrari, RH; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Lonial, S; O'Donnell, EK; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Voorhees, P; Zweegman, S, 2018) |
"Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease with a prognosis that varies with patient factors, disease burden, tumor biology, and treatments." | 2.55 | The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma. ( Barley, K; Barlogie, B; Chari, A; Cho, HJ; Jagannath, S; Lancman, G; Madduri, D; Moshier, E; Parekh, S; Tremblay, D, 2017) |
" Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects." | 2.55 | Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Lonial, S; Panjic, EH; Schlafer, D; Shah, KS, 2017) |
" We focused on adverse events associated with such agents and described how they should be managed." | 2.55 | Management of adverse events induced by next-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma. ( Boccadoro, M; Bonello, F; Larocca, A; Salvini, M, 2017) |
"Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs." | 2.53 | Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Azab, AK; Ghazarian, RN; Kusdono, HD; Luderer, MJ; Muz, B; Ou, M, 2016) |
"Ixazomib (Ninlaro(®)) is an orally bioavailable, reversible proteasome inhibitor developed by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc." | 2.53 | Ixazomib: First Global Approval. ( Shirley, M, 2016) |
"Ixazomib is an investigational, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor." | 2.52 | The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Anderson, KC; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2015) |
"Multiple myeloma is still an incurable disease with pattern of regression and remission followed by multiple relapses raising from the residual myeloma cells surviving even in the patients who achieve complete clinical response to treatment." | 2.50 | New approaches to management of multiple myeloma. ( Cavallo, F; Genadieva-Stavric, S; Palumbo, A, 2014) |
"Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug." | 1.72 | An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022) |
"This study evaluates real-life multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based treatments in the second or third therapy line in 2017 in Germany." | 1.56 | Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany. ( Gonzalez-McQuire, S; Lebioda, A; Poenisch, W; Rieth, A; Schoehl, M; Singh, M; Steinmetz, HT, 2020) |
"We provide a real-world overview of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment patterns, outcomes and healthcare resource use (HRU) in Portugal." | 1.51 | Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal. ( Antunes, L; Bento, MJ; Chacim, S; Lefèvre, C; Pereira, M; Pereira, S; Rocha-Gonçalves, F; Zagorska, A, 2019) |
"Glyphosate-treated wild-type mice developed benign monoclonal gammopathy with increased serum IgG, anemia, and plasma cell presence in the spleen and bone marrow." | 1.51 | Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice. ( Deng, Q; Gong, Z; Hu, H; Li, Y; Liu, M; Lu, Z; Ma, X; Wang, L; Xu-Monette, ZY; Young, KH; Zhang, S, 2019) |
"Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide that is one of the most frequently applied pesticides in the world." | 1.33 | Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. ( Alavanja, MC; Blair, A; De Roos, AJ; Dosemeci, M; Hoppin, JA; Rusiecki, JA; Sandler, DP; Svec, M, 2005) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 5 (3.09) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 2 (1.23) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 3 (1.85) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 85 (52.47) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 67 (41.36) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Hardi, A | 1 |
Varga, G | 2 |
Nagy, Z | 2 |
Kosztolányi, S | 2 |
Váróczy, L | 2 |
Plander, M | 2 |
Schneider, T | 2 |
Demeter, J | 2 |
Alizadeh, H | 2 |
Illés, Á | 2 |
Masszi, T | 5 |
Mikala, G | 3 |
Sokol, J | 1 |
Guman, T | 1 |
Chudej, J | 1 |
Hlebaskova, M | 1 |
Stecova, N | 1 |
Valekova, L | 1 |
Kucerikova, M | 1 |
Stasko, J | 1 |
Voorhees, PM | 1 |
Suman, VJ | 1 |
Tuchman, SA | 1 |
Laubach, JP | 8 |
Hassoun, H | 2 |
Efebera, YA | 1 |
Mulkey, F | 1 |
Bova-Solem, M | 1 |
Santo, K | 1 |
Carlisle, D | 1 |
McCarthy, PL | 1 |
Richardson, PG | 17 |
Iida, S | 3 |
Izumi, T | 1 |
Komeno, T | 1 |
Terui, Y | 1 |
Chou, T | 3 |
Ikeda, T | 1 |
Berg, D | 13 |
Fukunaga, S | 1 |
Sugiura, K | 1 |
Sasaki, M | 1 |
Kakimoto, Y | 1 |
Hoshino, M | 1 |
Hashimoto, M | 1 |
Hiraizumi, M | 1 |
Shimizu, K | 1 |
Shen, M | 1 |
Zhang, J | 4 |
Tang, R | 1 |
Wang, Y | 3 |
Zhan, X | 1 |
Fan, S | 1 |
Huang, Z | 1 |
Zhong, Y | 1 |
Li, X | 1 |
Mina, R | 1 |
Falcone, AP | 1 |
Bringhen, S | 2 |
Liberati, AM | 2 |
Pescosta, N | 1 |
Petrucci, MT | 2 |
Ciccone, G | 1 |
Capra, A | 1 |
Patriarca, F | 1 |
Rota-Scalabrini, D | 1 |
Bonello, F | 2 |
Musolino, C | 1 |
Cea, M | 1 |
Zambello, R | 1 |
Tacchetti, P | 1 |
Belotti, A | 1 |
Cellini, C | 1 |
Paris, L | 1 |
Grasso, M | 1 |
Aquino, S | 1 |
De Paoli, L | 1 |
De Sabbata, G | 1 |
Ballanti, S | 1 |
Offidani, M | 4 |
Boccadoro, M | 4 |
Monaco, F | 1 |
Corradini, P | 1 |
Larocca, A | 3 |
Chen, H | 1 |
Shao, C | 1 |
Sun, C | 1 |
Zheng, C | 1 |
Wang, J | 1 |
Shang, JJ | 1 |
Jin, S | 1 |
Yao, Y | 1 |
Yan, Z | 1 |
Wu, DP | 1 |
Fu, CC | 1 |
Patel, KK | 1 |
Shah, JJ | 1 |
Feng, L | 1 |
Lee, HC | 2 |
Manasanch, EM | 1 |
Olsem, J | 1 |
Morphey, A | 1 |
Huo, XJ | 1 |
Thomas, SK | 1 |
Bashir, Q | 1 |
Qazilbash, MH | 1 |
Weber, DM | 1 |
Orlowski, RZ | 1 |
Dimopoulos, MA | 10 |
Schjesvold, F | 4 |
Doronin, V | 1 |
Vinogradova, O | 1 |
Quach, H | 2 |
Leleu, X | 4 |
Montes, YG | 1 |
Ramasamy, K | 4 |
Pompa, A | 1 |
Levin, MD | 4 |
Lee, C | 1 |
Mellqvist, UH | 2 |
Fenk, R | 1 |
Demarquette, H | 1 |
Sati, H | 1 |
Vorog, A | 2 |
Labotka, R | 11 |
Du, J | 1 |
Darif, M | 1 |
Kumar, S | 9 |
Touzeau, C | 3 |
Perrot, A | 1 |
Roussel, M | 1 |
Karlin, L | 2 |
Benboubker, L | 2 |
Jacquet, C | 1 |
Mohty, M | 2 |
Facon, T | 2 |
Manier, S | 1 |
Chretien, ML | 1 |
Tiab, M | 1 |
Hulin, C | 1 |
Loiseau, HA | 1 |
Dejoie, T | 1 |
Planche, L | 1 |
Attal, M | 1 |
Moreau, P | 18 |
Szudy-Szczyrek, A | 1 |
Chocholska, S | 1 |
Bachanek-Mitura, O | 1 |
Czabak, O | 1 |
Mlak, R | 1 |
Szczyrek, M | 1 |
Muzyka-Kasietczuk, J | 1 |
Hus, M | 1 |
Auner, HW | 2 |
Brown, SR | 1 |
Walker, K | 2 |
Kendall, J | 1 |
Dawkins, B | 2 |
Meads, D | 2 |
Morgan, GJ | 3 |
Kaiser, MF | 2 |
Cook, M | 3 |
Roberts, S | 1 |
Parrish, C | 1 |
Cook, G | 4 |
Daniely, D | 1 |
Forouzan, E | 1 |
Spektor, TM | 1 |
Cohen, A | 1 |
Bitran, JD | 1 |
Chen, G | 1 |
Moezi, MM | 1 |
Bessudo, A | 1 |
Hrom, J | 1 |
Eshaghian, S | 1 |
Swift, RA | 1 |
Eades, BM | 1 |
Kim, C | 1 |
Lim, S | 1 |
Berenson, JR | 2 |
Yamaoka, K | 1 |
Fujiwara, M | 1 |
Uchida, M | 1 |
Uesawa, Y | 1 |
Muroi, N | 1 |
Shimizu, T | 2 |
Srimani, JK | 1 |
Diderichsen, PM | 2 |
Hanley, MJ | 6 |
Venkatakrishnan, K | 7 |
Gupta, N | 17 |
Muchtar, E | 1 |
Gertz, MA | 3 |
LaPlant, BR | 2 |
Buadi, FK | 3 |
Leung, N | 2 |
O'Brien, P | 1 |
Bergsagel, PL | 3 |
Fonder, A | 1 |
Hwa, YL | 2 |
Hobbs, M | 1 |
Helgeson, DK | 1 |
Bradt, EE | 1 |
Gonsalves, W | 2 |
Lacy, MQ | 4 |
Kapoor, P | 4 |
Siddiqui, M | 1 |
Larsen, JT | 1 |
Warsame, R | 1 |
Hayman, SR | 2 |
Go, RS | 2 |
Dingli, D | 2 |
Kourelis, TV | 1 |
Dispenzieri, A | 4 |
Rajkumar, SV | 11 |
Kumar, SK | 11 |
Xia, J | 1 |
Wu, X | 1 |
Du, W | 1 |
Zhu, Y | 3 |
Liu, X | 1 |
Liu, Z | 1 |
Meng, B | 1 |
Guo, J | 1 |
Yang, Q | 1 |
Wang, Q | 2 |
Feng, X | 1 |
Xie, G | 1 |
Shen, Y | 1 |
He, Y | 2 |
Xiang, J | 1 |
Wu, M | 1 |
An, G | 1 |
Qiu, L | 1 |
Jia, W | 1 |
Zhou, W | 1 |
Zhi, Y | 1 |
Bao, S | 1 |
Mao, J | 1 |
Chai, G | 1 |
Zhu, J | 1 |
Liu, C | 1 |
Chen, X | 3 |
Goel, U | 1 |
Yang, C | 1 |
Zhuang, JL | 1 |
Deng, M | 1 |
Yuan, H | 1 |
Peng, H | 1 |
Liu, S | 1 |
Xiao, X | 1 |
Wang, Z | 1 |
Zhang, G | 1 |
Xiao, H | 1 |
Wilson, N | 1 |
Reese, S | 1 |
Ptak, L | 1 |
Aziz, F | 1 |
Parajuli, S | 1 |
Jucaud, V | 1 |
Denham, S | 1 |
Mishra, A | 1 |
Cascalho, M | 1 |
Platt, JL | 1 |
Hematti, P | 1 |
Djamali, A | 1 |
Oka, S | 1 |
Ono, K | 1 |
Nohgawa, M | 1 |
Ludwig, H | 3 |
Pönisch, W | 1 |
Knop, S | 2 |
Egle, A | 2 |
Hinke, A | 1 |
Schreder, M | 2 |
Lechner, D | 2 |
Hajek, R | 9 |
Gunsilius, E | 2 |
Petzer, A | 2 |
Weisel, K | 3 |
Niederwieser, D | 2 |
Einsele, H | 4 |
Willenbacher, W | 2 |
Rumpold, H | 1 |
Pour, L | 5 |
Jelinek, T | 3 |
Krenosz, KJ | 2 |
Meckl, A | 1 |
Nolte, S | 1 |
Melchardt, T | 2 |
Greil, R | 2 |
Zojer, N | 2 |
Poenisch, W | 2 |
Goldschmidt, H | 3 |
Maisnar, V | 3 |
Spicka, I | 3 |
Abildgaard, N | 2 |
Rowlings, P | 1 |
Cain, L | 1 |
Romanus, D | 2 |
Suryanarayan, K | 4 |
Rajkumar, V | 2 |
Odom, D | 1 |
Gnanasakthy, A | 1 |
Dimopoulos, M | 1 |
Salcedo, M | 1 |
Lendvai, N | 1 |
Mastey, D | 1 |
Schlossman, J | 1 |
Hultcrantz, M | 1 |
Korde, N | 1 |
Mailankody, S | 1 |
Lesokhin, A | 1 |
Smith, E | 1 |
Shah, U | 1 |
Diab, V | 1 |
Werner, K | 1 |
Landau, H | 1 |
Lahoud, O | 1 |
Drullinsky, P | 1 |
Shah, G | 1 |
Chung, D | 1 |
Scordo, M | 1 |
Giralt, S | 1 |
Landgren, O | 1 |
Sherman, DJ | 1 |
Li, J | 4 |
Donato, F | 1 |
Pira, E | 1 |
Ciocan, C | 1 |
Boffetta, P | 1 |
Diamond, B | 1 |
Maclachlan, K | 1 |
Chung, DJ | 1 |
Lesokhin, AM | 1 |
Ola Landgren, C | 1 |
Di Bacco, A | 7 |
Bahlis, NJ | 5 |
Munshi, NC | 1 |
Avet-Loiseau, H | 3 |
Viterbo, L | 2 |
Ganly, P | 3 |
Cavo, M | 4 |
Langer, C | 2 |
Keats, JJ | 1 |
Lin, J | 5 |
Li, B | 3 |
Badola, S | 1 |
Shen, L | 2 |
Esseltine, DL | 5 |
Luptakova, K | 1 |
van de Velde, H | 6 |
Cohen, YC | 1 |
Magen, H | 1 |
Lavi, N | 1 |
Gatt, ME | 1 |
Chubar, E | 1 |
Horowitz, N | 1 |
Kreiniz, N | 1 |
Tadmor, T | 1 |
Trestman, S | 1 |
Vitkon, R | 1 |
Rouvio, O | 1 |
Shvetz, O | 1 |
Shaulov, A | 1 |
Ziv-Baran, T | 1 |
Avivi, I | 2 |
Terpos, E | 3 |
Maouche, N | 2 |
Minarik, J | 2 |
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I | 1 |
Katodritou, E | 2 |
Jenner, MW | 2 |
Plonkova, H | 2 |
Gavriatopoulou, M | 1 |
Vallance, GD | 2 |
Pika, T | 2 |
Kotsopoulou, M | 1 |
Kothari, J | 2 |
Kastritis, E | 2 |
Aitchison, R | 2 |
Zomas, A | 1 |
Zink, KA | 1 |
Fajardo, S | 1 |
Weisel, KC | 2 |
Chng, WJ | 5 |
Teng, Z | 7 |
Mateos, MV | 6 |
Dash, AB | 2 |
Zhang, K | 2 |
Zou, L | 1 |
Chen, S | 1 |
Jiang, D | 1 |
Hu, J | 1 |
Li, Z | 1 |
Guo, SL | 1 |
Wang, WL | 1 |
Kaiser, M | 2 |
Beksaç, M | 3 |
Gulbrandsen, N | 1 |
de Arriba de la Fuente, F | 1 |
West, S | 1 |
Spencer, A | 5 |
Czorniak, M | 1 |
Li, C | 1 |
Boiten, HJ | 1 |
Buijze, M | 1 |
Zweegman, S | 5 |
Goicoechea, I | 1 |
Puig, N | 2 |
Cedena, MT | 1 |
Burgos, L | 1 |
Cordón, L | 1 |
Vidriales, MB | 1 |
Flores-Montero, J | 1 |
Gutierrez, NC | 1 |
Calasanz, MJ | 1 |
Ramos, MM | 1 |
Lara-Astiaso, D | 1 |
Vilas-Zornoza, A | 1 |
Alignani, D | 1 |
Rodriguez, I | 1 |
Sarvide, S | 1 |
Alameda, D | 1 |
Garcés, JJ | 1 |
Rodriguez, S | 1 |
Fresquet, V | 1 |
Celay, J | 1 |
Garcia-Sanz, R | 1 |
Martinez-Lopez, J | 2 |
Oriol, A | 2 |
Rios, R | 1 |
Martin-Sanchez, J | 1 |
Martinez-Martinez, R | 1 |
Sarra, J | 1 |
Hernandez, MT | 1 |
de la Rubia, J | 1 |
Krsnik, I | 1 |
Moraleda, JM | 1 |
Palomera, L | 1 |
Bargay, J | 1 |
Martinez-Climent, JA | 1 |
Orfao, A | 1 |
Rosiñol, L | 1 |
Lahuerta, JJ | 1 |
Blade, J | 1 |
San Miguel, J | 1 |
Paiva, B | 1 |
Steinmetz, HT | 1 |
Singh, M | 1 |
Lebioda, A | 1 |
Gonzalez-McQuire, S | 1 |
Rieth, A | 1 |
Schoehl, M | 1 |
Zhang, M | 1 |
Huang, B | 1 |
Kuang, L | 1 |
Xiao, F | 1 |
Zheng, D | 1 |
Bao, L | 1 |
Xia, Z | 1 |
Wang, S | 1 |
Zhou, X | 1 |
Ding, K | 1 |
Zhang, W | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Fu, C | 1 |
Chen, B | 1 |
Hua, L | 1 |
Wang, L | 2 |
Luo, J | 1 |
Yang, Y | 1 |
Xu, T | 1 |
Wang, W | 1 |
Huang, Y | 1 |
Wu, G | 1 |
Liu, P | 1 |
Nakayama, H | 1 |
Kato, J | 1 |
Kikuchi, T | 1 |
Okayama, M | 1 |
Kamiya, T | 1 |
Mizuno, K | 1 |
Okamoto, S | 1 |
Mori, T | 1 |
Manda, S | 1 |
Yimer, HA | 1 |
Noga, SJ | 1 |
Girnius, S | 1 |
Yasenchak, CA | 1 |
Charu, V | 1 |
Lyons, R | 1 |
Aiello, J | 1 |
Bogard, K | 1 |
Ferrari, RH | 2 |
Cherepanov, D | 2 |
Demers, B | 1 |
Lu, V | 2 |
Whidden, P | 1 |
Kambhampati, S | 1 |
Birhiray, RE | 1 |
Jhangiani, HS | 1 |
Boccia, R | 1 |
Rifkin, RM | 2 |
Hinsley, S | 1 |
Sherratt, D | 1 |
Bailey, L | 1 |
Reed, S | 1 |
Flanagan, L | 1 |
McKee, S | 1 |
Brudenell Straw, F | 1 |
Brown, S | 1 |
Garg, M | 2 |
Morgan, G | 4 |
Wang, B | 3 |
Palumbo, A | 6 |
Lonial, S | 8 |
Ling, Y | 1 |
Li, R | 1 |
Zhong, J | 1 |
Zhao, Y | 2 |
Chen, Z | 1 |
Jin, F | 1 |
Yang, M | 1 |
Chen, Y | 2 |
Jiang, L | 1 |
Liu, L | 1 |
Parrondo, RD | 1 |
Alegria, V | 1 |
Roy, V | 5 |
Sher, T | 1 |
Chanan-Khan, AA | 1 |
Ailawadhi, S | 2 |
Stege, CAM | 2 |
Haukas, E | 1 |
Schjesvold, FH | 1 |
Waage, A | 1 |
Leys, RBL | 1 |
Klein, SK | 2 |
Szatkowski, D | 1 |
Axelsson, P | 1 |
Hieu Do, T | 1 |
Knut-Bojanowska, D | 1 |
van der Spek, E | 2 |
Svirskaite, A | 1 |
Klostergaard, A | 1 |
Salomo, M | 1 |
Blimark, C | 1 |
Ypma, PF | 1 |
Poddighe, PJ | 1 |
Stevens-Kroef, M | 1 |
van de Donk, NWCJ | 3 |
Sonneveld, P | 2 |
Hansson, M | 3 |
van der Holt, B | 1 |
Kishore, B | 1 |
Boyd, K | 1 |
Bhatti, Z | 1 |
Bird, SA | 1 |
Chander, G | 1 |
Robinson, R | 1 |
Offer, M | 1 |
Peniket, A | 1 |
Dungarwalla, M | 1 |
Collings, F | 1 |
Bygrave, C | 1 |
Ziff, M | 1 |
Lawson, G | 1 |
De-Silva, D | 1 |
Cheesman, S | 1 |
Kyriakou, C | 1 |
Mahmood, S | 1 |
Papanikolaou, X | 1 |
Rabin, N | 1 |
Sachchithananthan, S | 1 |
Sive, J | 1 |
Wechalekar, A | 1 |
Yong, K | 3 |
Popat, R | 1 |
Radocha, J | 1 |
Jungova, A | 1 |
Straub, J | 1 |
Pavlicek, P | 1 |
Mistrik, M | 1 |
Brozova, L | 1 |
Krhovska, P | 1 |
Machalkova, K | 1 |
Jindra, P | 1 |
Stork, M | 1 |
Bacovsky, J | 1 |
Capkova, L | 1 |
Sykora, M | 1 |
Kessler, P | 1 |
Stejskal, L | 1 |
Heindorfer, A | 1 |
Ullrychova, J | 1 |
Skacel, T | 4 |
Takakuwa, T | 2 |
Yamamura, R | 2 |
Ohta, K | 2 |
Kaneko, H | 1 |
Imada, K | 1 |
Nakaya, A | 1 |
Fuchida, SI | 1 |
Shibayama, H | 2 |
Matsuda, M | 1 |
Shimazu, Y | 1 |
Adachi, Y | 1 |
Kosugi, S | 1 |
Uchiyama, H | 1 |
Tanaka, H | 1 |
Hanamoto, H | 1 |
Shimura, Y | 1 |
Kanda, J | 1 |
Onda, Y | 1 |
Uoshima, N | 1 |
Yagi, H | 1 |
Yoshihara, S | 1 |
Hino, M | 1 |
Shimazaki, C | 1 |
Takaori-Kondo, A | 1 |
Kuroda, J | 1 |
Matsumura, I | 1 |
Kanakura, Y | 1 |
Nomura, S | 1 |
Polusani, SR | 1 |
Cortez, V | 1 |
Esparza, J | 1 |
Nguyen, HN | 1 |
Fan, H | 1 |
Velagaleti, GVN | 1 |
Butler, MJ | 1 |
Kinney, MC | 1 |
Oyajobi, BO | 1 |
Habib, SL | 1 |
Asmis, R | 1 |
Medina, EA | 1 |
Abdollahi, P | 1 |
Vandsemb, EN | 1 |
Elsaadi, S | 1 |
Røst, LM | 1 |
Yang, R | 1 |
Hjort, MA | 1 |
Andreassen, T | 1 |
Misund, K | 1 |
Slørdahl, TS | 1 |
Rø, TB | 1 |
Sponaas, AM | 1 |
Moestue, S | 1 |
Bruheim, P | 1 |
Børset, M | 1 |
Dong, Z | 1 |
Su, J | 1 |
Huang, J | 1 |
Xiao, P | 1 |
Tian, L | 1 |
Ma, L | 1 |
Fogli, S | 1 |
Galimberti, S | 1 |
Gori, V | 1 |
Del Re, M | 1 |
Danesi, R | 1 |
Venner, CP | 2 |
Offner, F | 1 |
White, DJ | 1 |
Rigaudeau, S | 1 |
Rodon, P | 1 |
Voog, E | 1 |
Yoon, SS | 1 |
Suzuki, K | 2 |
Zhang, X | 3 |
Twumasi-Ankrah, P | 1 |
Yung, G | 1 |
Nasserinejad, K | 1 |
Bilgin, YM | 1 |
Kentos, A | 1 |
Sohne, M | 1 |
van Kampen, RJW | 1 |
Ludwig, I | 1 |
Thielen, N | 1 |
Durdu-Rayman, N | 1 |
de Graauw, NCHP | 1 |
de Waal, EGM | 1 |
Vekemans, MC | 1 |
Timmers, GJ | 1 |
van der Klift, M | 1 |
Soechit, S | 1 |
Geerts, PAF | 1 |
Silbermann, MH | 1 |
Oosterveld, M | 1 |
Nijhof, IS | 1 |
Davies, F | 2 |
Rifkin, R | 1 |
Costello, C | 2 |
Usmani, S | 1 |
Abonour, R | 1 |
Stull, DM | 1 |
Huang, H | 1 |
Berdeja, J | 2 |
Thompson, M | 1 |
Zonder, J | 1 |
Vela-Ojeda, J | 1 |
Farrelly, E | 1 |
Raju, A | 1 |
Blazer, M | 1 |
Chari, A | 4 |
Bergin, K | 1 |
Yuen, F | 1 |
Wallington-Beddoe, C | 1 |
Kalff, A | 1 |
Sirdesai, S | 1 |
Reynolds, J | 1 |
Sanderson, MP | 1 |
Friese-Hamim, M | 1 |
Walter-Bausch, G | 1 |
Busch, M | 1 |
Gaus, S | 1 |
Musil, D | 1 |
Rohdich, F | 1 |
Zanelli, U | 1 |
Downey-Kopyscinski, SL | 1 |
Mitsiades, CS | 1 |
Schadt, O | 1 |
Klein, M | 1 |
Esdar, C | 1 |
Reece, DE | 1 |
Masih-Khan, E | 1 |
Atenafu, EG | 1 |
Jimenez-Zepeda, VH | 1 |
McCurdy, A | 1 |
Song, K | 1 |
LeBlanc, R | 1 |
Sebag, M | 1 |
White, D | 1 |
Cherniawsky, H | 1 |
Reiman, A | 1 |
Stakiw, J | 1 |
Louzada, ML | 1 |
Kotb, R | 1 |
Aslam, M | 1 |
Gul, E | 1 |
Harousseau, JL | 1 |
Hari, P | 4 |
Shustik, C | 1 |
Romeril, K | 1 |
Minnema, MC | 1 |
de Wit, E | 1 |
Al-Salama, ZT | 1 |
Garnock-Jones, KP | 1 |
Scott, LJ | 1 |
Bonnet, A | 1 |
Hou, J | 1 |
Jin, J | 1 |
Xu, Y | 1 |
Wu, D | 1 |
Ke, X | 1 |
Zhou, D | 1 |
Lu, J | 1 |
Du, X | 1 |
Liu, J | 1 |
Li, H | 1 |
Hua, Z | 1 |
Wang, H | 1 |
Yang, H | 5 |
Zhang, S | 2 |
Liu, R | 1 |
Ma, H | 1 |
Su, Z | 1 |
Sun, F | 1 |
Zhao, N | 1 |
Pluta, A | 2 |
Nagler, A | 1 |
Ben-Yehuda, D | 1 |
San-Miguel, J | 1 |
Xu, W | 1 |
Sun, X | 1 |
Guo, H | 1 |
Lancman, G | 1 |
Tremblay, D | 1 |
Barley, K | 1 |
Barlogie, B | 1 |
Cho, HJ | 1 |
Jagannath, S | 1 |
Madduri, D | 1 |
Moshier, E | 1 |
Parekh, S | 1 |
Mikhael, JR | 2 |
Salvini, M | 2 |
Troia, R | 1 |
Giudice, D | 1 |
Pautasso, C | 1 |
Corvatta, L | 3 |
Gentili, S | 3 |
Ke, A | 1 |
Patel, C | 1 |
Liu, G | 4 |
Scalzulli, E | 1 |
Grammatico, S | 1 |
Vozella, F | 1 |
Striha, A | 1 |
Ashcroft, AJ | 1 |
Hockaday, A | 1 |
Cairns, DA | 1 |
Boardman, K | 1 |
Jacques, G | 1 |
Williams, C | 1 |
Snowden, JA | 1 |
Cavenagh, J | 1 |
Drayson, MT | 1 |
Owen, R | 1 |
Armoiry, X | 1 |
Connock, M | 1 |
Tsertsvadze, A | 1 |
Cummins, E | 1 |
Melendez-Torres, GJ | 1 |
Royle, P | 1 |
Clarke, A | 1 |
Lin, HM | 1 |
Nunes, AT | 1 |
Annunziata, CM | 1 |
Hofmeister, CC | 2 |
Rosenbaum, CA | 1 |
Htut, M | 1 |
Vesole, DH | 1 |
Berdeja, JG | 3 |
Liedtke, M | 1 |
Smith, SD | 1 |
Lebovic, D | 1 |
Raje, N | 4 |
Byrne, C | 4 |
Liao, E | 3 |
Bacco, AD | 1 |
Estevam, J | 2 |
Baz, R | 2 |
Barrio, S | 1 |
Stühmer, T | 2 |
Da-Viá, M | 1 |
Barrio-Garcia, C | 1 |
Lehners, N | 1 |
Besse, A | 1 |
Cuenca, I | 1 |
Garitano-Trojaola, A | 1 |
Fink, S | 1 |
Leich, E | 1 |
Chatterjee, M | 2 |
Driessen, C | 2 |
Rosenwald, A | 1 |
Beckmann, R | 1 |
Bargou, RC | 2 |
Braggio, E | 1 |
Stewart, AK | 4 |
Raab, MS | 1 |
Kortüm, KM | 1 |
Zanwar, S | 1 |
Abeykoon, JP | 1 |
O'Donnell, EK | 1 |
Voorhees, P | 1 |
Grzasko, N | 4 |
Delimpasi, S | 1 |
Jedrzejczak, WW | 2 |
Grosicki, S | 2 |
Kyrtsonis, MC | 1 |
Nahi, H | 1 |
Gruber, A | 1 |
Gay, F | 1 |
Min, CK | 3 |
Xie, J | 1 |
Wan, N | 1 |
Liang, Z | 1 |
Zhang, T | 1 |
Jiang, J | 1 |
Niesvizky, R | 3 |
Hamadani, M | 2 |
Vescio, R | 2 |
Kaufman, JL | 2 |
Szomor, Á | 1 |
Deák, B | 1 |
Szendrei, T | 1 |
Bátai, Á | 1 |
Pető, M | 1 |
Antunes, L | 1 |
Rocha-Gonçalves, F | 1 |
Chacim, S | 1 |
Lefèvre, C | 1 |
Pereira, M | 1 |
Pereira, S | 1 |
Zagorska, A | 1 |
Bento, MJ | 1 |
Hall, KH | 1 |
Smolewski, P | 1 |
Rydygier, D | 1 |
Echeveste Gutierrez, MA | 1 |
San-Miguel, JF | 1 |
Brünnert, D | 1 |
Kraus, M | 1 |
Kirner, S | 1 |
Heiden, R | 1 |
Goyal, P | 1 |
Cai, H | 1 |
Zhang, L | 2 |
Li, N | 1 |
Zheng, B | 1 |
Liu, M | 2 |
Araki, T | 1 |
Miura, A | 1 |
Fujitani, Y | 1 |
Takeoka, Y | 1 |
Deng, Q | 1 |
Hu, H | 1 |
Gong, Z | 1 |
Xu-Monette, ZY | 1 |
Lu, Z | 1 |
Young, KH | 1 |
Ma, X | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
Fujii, S | 1 |
Abe, M | 1 |
Garcia-Gomez, A | 1 |
Quwaider, D | 1 |
Canavese, M | 1 |
Ocio, EM | 1 |
Tian, Z | 3 |
Blanco, JF | 1 |
Berger, AJ | 2 |
Ortiz-de-Solorzano, C | 1 |
Hernández-Iglesias, T | 1 |
Martens, AC | 1 |
Groen, RW | 1 |
Mateo-Urdiales, J | 1 |
Fraile, S | 1 |
Galarraga, M | 1 |
Chauhan, D | 3 |
San Miguel, JF | 2 |
Garayoa, M | 1 |
Genadieva-Stavric, S | 1 |
Cavallo, F | 1 |
Bensinger, WI | 1 |
Zimmerman, TM | 1 |
Reeder, CB | 3 |
Hui, AM | 9 |
Yu, J | 2 |
Shou, Y | 1 |
Wang, M | 2 |
Jakubowiak, AJ | 1 |
Harvey, RD | 2 |
Talpaz, M | 1 |
Pratt, G | 1 |
Sorahan, T | 2 |
Anderson, KC | 3 |
Smith, EM | 2 |
Walker, BA | 2 |
Davenport, EL | 2 |
Aronson, LI | 1 |
Krige, D | 2 |
Hooftman, L | 2 |
Drummond, AH | 2 |
Davies, FE | 2 |
Gentile, M | 1 |
Vigna, E | 1 |
Recchia, AG | 1 |
Morabito, L | 1 |
Morabito, F | 1 |
LaPlant, B | 1 |
Laumann, K | 1 |
Thompson, MA | 2 |
Witzig, TE | 2 |
Rivera, CE | 2 |
Hwa, L | 1 |
Fonseca, R | 1 |
Chanan-Khan, A | 1 |
Goh, YT | 1 |
Lee, JH | 1 |
Kim, K | 1 |
Wong, RS | 1 |
Chim, CS | 1 |
Maracci, L | 1 |
Leoni, P | 1 |
Poh, A | 1 |
Muz, B | 1 |
Ghazarian, RN | 1 |
Ou, M | 1 |
Luderer, MJ | 1 |
Kusdono, HD | 1 |
Azab, AK | 1 |
Shirley, M | 1 |
Ratner, M | 1 |
Park, J | 1 |
Park, E | 1 |
Jung, CK | 1 |
Kang, SW | 1 |
Kim, BG | 1 |
Jung, Y | 1 |
Kim, TH | 1 |
Lim, JY | 1 |
Lee, SE | 1 |
Won, KA | 1 |
Chang, ET | 1 |
Delzell, E | 1 |
Sandhu, I | 1 |
Baker, BW | 1 |
Jackson, SR | 1 |
Stoppa, AM | 1 |
Simpson, DR | 1 |
Gimsing, P | 1 |
Garderet, L | 1 |
Berg, DT | 1 |
Burki, TK | 1 |
Badros, A | 1 |
Lipe, B | 1 |
Kukreti, V | 1 |
Qian, M | 1 |
Halvorson, AE | 1 |
Buadi, F | 1 |
Crawley, J | 1 |
Mikhael, J | 1 |
Stewart, K | 1 |
Lin, Y | 1 |
Schlafer, D | 1 |
Shah, KS | 1 |
Panjic, EH | 1 |
Jouni, H | 1 |
Aubry, MC | 1 |
Vincent Rajkumar, S | 1 |
Frye, RL | 1 |
Herrmann, J | 1 |
Desai, A | 1 |
Zeng, D | 1 |
Gong, T | 1 |
Lu, P | 1 |
Handa, H | 1 |
Ishizawa, K | 1 |
Takubo, T | 1 |
Kase, Y | 1 |
Burstyn, I | 1 |
De Roos, AJ | 2 |
Yui, JC | 1 |
Tumber, A | 1 |
Nuzzi, A | 1 |
Hookway, ES | 1 |
Hatch, SB | 1 |
Velupillai, S | 1 |
Johansson, C | 1 |
Kawamura, A | 1 |
Savitsky, P | 1 |
Yapp, C | 1 |
Szykowska, A | 1 |
Wu, N | 1 |
Bountra, C | 1 |
Strain-Damerell, C | 1 |
Burgess-Brown, NA | 1 |
Ruda, GF | 1 |
Fedorov, O | 1 |
Munro, S | 1 |
England, KS | 1 |
Nowak, RP | 1 |
Schofield, CJ | 1 |
La Thangue, NB | 1 |
Pawlyn, C | 1 |
Athanasou, N | 1 |
Müller, S | 1 |
Oppermann, U | 1 |
Brennan, PE | 1 |
Koulaouzidis, G | 1 |
Lyon, AR | 1 |
Moore, HE | 1 |
Muralikrishnan, S | 1 |
Dunlop, AS | 1 |
Zhou, B | 1 |
Kuhn, D | 1 |
Orlowski, R | 1 |
Richardson, P | 2 |
Appel, A | 1 |
Zhao, JJ | 1 |
Tai, YT | 1 |
Amin, SB | 1 |
Hu, Y | 1 |
DRIVSHOLM, A | 2 |
MILNE, MD | 1 |
Blair, A | 1 |
Rusiecki, JA | 1 |
Hoppin, JA | 1 |
Svec, M | 1 |
Dosemeci, M | 1 |
Sandler, DP | 1 |
Alavanja, MC | 1 |
Farmer, DR | 1 |
Lash, TL | 1 |
Acquavella, JF | 1 |
Meijer, JJ | 1 |
van Dijken, JP | 1 |
Matsuura, K | 1 |
Sinohara, H | 1 |
Hansson, UB | 1 |
Wu, TT | 1 |
Kabat, EA | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase I/II Study of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Ixazomib vs. Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Relapsing on Lenalidomide as Part of First Line Therapy[NCT02004275] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 118 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-02-28 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Japanese Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT02917941] | Phase 2 | 34 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-11-01 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib/Dexamethasone and Oral Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT03170882] | Phase 2 | 122 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-08-01 | Completed | ||
Phase 1/2 Trial of Ixazomib in Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma or Light Chain Amyloidosis[NCT01864018] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 87 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-08-20 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Ixazomib in Combination With Thalidomide - Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT02410694] | Phase 2 | 90 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-04-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Citrate (MLN9708) Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant[NCT02181413] | Phase 3 | 656 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-07-01 | Active, not recruiting | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01564537] | Phase 3 | 722 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-08-01 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, National, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial Studying Induction Therapy With Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone (VRD-GEM), Followed by High-dose Chemotherapy With Melphalan-200 (MEL-200) Versus Busulfan-melphalan (BUMEL), and Consol[NCT01916252] | Phase 3 | 460 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2013-09-30 | Completed | ||
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2, Pilot Study, Evaluating Early Treatment With Bispecific T-cell Redirectors (Teclistamab and Talquetamab) in the Frontline Therapy of Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma[NCT05849610] | Phase 2 | 30 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2023-11-30 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy After Initial Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Treated With Stem Cell Transplantation[NCT02312258] | Phase 3 | 706 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-04-09 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT01850524] | Phase 3 | 705 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-29 | Completed | ||
Dynamic Frailty Assessment for Guiding the Treatment in Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma :a Prospective and Single-center Study[NCT06099912] | 120 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2023-12-30 | Not yet recruiting | |||
A Phase I Open Label First in Human Dose Escalation of the Immunoproteasome Inhibitor M3258 as a Single Agent and Expansion Study of M3258 in Combination With Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT04075721] | Phase 1 | 10 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-09-26 | Terminated (stopped due to The study was early discontinued due to lack of participant enrollment.) | ||
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Weekly Dosing of the Oral Form of MLN9708, a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT00963820] | Phase 1 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-10-31 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Re[NCT01217957] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 65 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-11-22 | Completed | ||
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT00932698] | Phase 1 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-10-12 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Study to Determine the Role of Ixazomib as an Augmented Conditioning Therapy in Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and as a Post-ASCT Consolidation and Maintenance Strategy in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT03562169] | Phase 3 | 406 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2017-03-20 | Recruiting | ||
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Oral Combination of Ixazomib (MLN9708) With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment[NCT02046070] | Phase 2 | 148 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2014-03-05 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective Study of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Ixazomib in Combination With Lenalidomide for Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT04217967] | Phase 4 | 180 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-01-03 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide, Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT04009109] | Phase 2 | 188 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-10-21 | Recruiting | ||
A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability Study of Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Asian Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01645930] | Phase 1 | 43 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-12-17 | Completed | ||
A Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib, Iberdomide (CC-220) and Dexamethasone (KID) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma[NCT05199311] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 66 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-05-13 | Recruiting | ||
GEM21menos65. A Phase III Trial for NDMM Patients Who Are Candidates for ASCT Comparing Extended VRD Plus Early Rescue Intervention vs Isatuximab-VRD vs Isatuximab-V-Iberdomide-D[NCT05558319] | Phase 3 | 480 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-10-31 | Not yet recruiting | ||
Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib Combinations in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT01415882] | Phase 2 | 108 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-01-31 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Multicenter Open Label Phase 2 Single Arm Study of Ixazomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Characterized With Genomic Abnormalities of Adverse Adverse Prognostic[NCT03683277] | Phase 2 | 26 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-11-03 | Terminated (stopped due to Recruitment issue, 26 patients enrolled instead of 70 initially planned) | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Disease response status is based on the IMWG criteria being held for two consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as proportion of patients with minimal response (MR) and better according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | proportion of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | .564 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | .737 |
Proportion of patients that went two of more cycles of treatment without discontinuing treatment for progression or intolerability. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 42 days
Intervention | proportion of partcipants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | .949 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | .921 |
(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years
Intervention | Months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | 12.3 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | 23.7 |
These events are reported in the adverse events section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 44.5 months
Intervention | participants with DLT (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | 0 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | 0 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | 1 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | 1 |
(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 39 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | 2 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | 3 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | 6 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | 5 |
The count of paitents that experenced an adverse event is reported in this section. A full table of these events is reported in the adverse event section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 92 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | 22 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) + Crossover Patients From Arm I | 33 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | 2 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | 2 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | 4 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | 6 |
For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined by the following adverse events at least possibly related to study therapy: Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Alopecia is not expected but would not be considered a DLT. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be adequately managed with optimal supportive care. Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be controlled with appropriate therapy Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 4 lymphopenia is expected with this regimen and will not be construed as a DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days despite appropriate supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days or is associated with greater then or equal to grade 3 bleeding event (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 28 days
Intervention | participants with DLT (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 1 Dose Level 1 | 0 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 2 | 0 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 3 | 1 |
Phase 1 Dose Level 4 | 1 |
ORR is defined as partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | proportion of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | .436 |
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | .632 |
Overall survival was analyzed from the time of registration to the date of death or last known date living. Due to median OS time not being reached due to lack of deaths at the time of this report by either arm, the 2 year OS rate has been reported. This analysis censors living patients at 2 years. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 2 years
Intervention | proportion of patients alive (Number) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | .795 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | .784 |
progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for disease progression is met. If a patient initiates another anti-cancer treatment prior to disease progression, they will be censored at the date of initiation of this treatment. Patients will be randomized to treatment using the Pocock-Simon algorithm balancing the distribution of the following stratification factors between the two treatment arms: 1) ISS 1-2 disease vs. ISS 3 disease (current ISS stage based off screening beta 2 microglobulin and albumin) 2) High risk cytogenetics features: yes vs. no High risk cytogenetics features include: del(1p), gain of 1q, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14; 20), del(17p) 3) Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor: yes vs. no (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | 228 |
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | 619 |
(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-registration (at crossover)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | 5.6 |
Pre-treatment patient-report of fatigue and overall quality of life (based on a 10-point Likert scale). A higher number indicates a better quality of life where 10 is the best outcome and 0 is the worst. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: baseline
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
High QoL(7-10) | Medium or Low QoL (0-7) | |
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | 21 | 16 |
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) | 27 | 11 |
(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years
Intervention | proportion of partcipants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Overall Response Rate | Clinical Benefit Rate | Disease Control Rate | |
Arm I(Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone) | .231 | .269 | .962 |
An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 34 |
ORR:percentage of participants with CR including stringent complete response(sCR),VGPR,partial response(PR) per independent review committee(IRC)by IMWG criteria.CR: serum,urine -ve immunofixation; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5%plasma cells in bone marrow(CR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels=normal FLC ratio 0.26 to 1.65+CR criteria).sCR:CR+normal FLC ratio,absence of clonal plasma cells(immunohistochemistry)or 2-to 4-color flow cytometry.VGPR:serum,urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,not by electrophoresis or ≥90%reduction,<100mg/24hrs(VGPR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels,requires>90%decrease in involved-uninvolved FLC level difference).PR: ≥50%reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hr urinary M protein by≥90%/ to<200mg/24-hr or ≥50%decrease in difference between involved-uninvolved FLC levels/≥50%reduction in bone marrow plasma cells,if≥30%at baseline/≥50%soft tissue plasmacytoma size reduction. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 84.4 |
OS was defined as the time from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | NA |
Response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR was defined as negative immunofixation in serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 50.0 |
PFS was defined as the time in months from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 22.05 |
TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD as assessed using IMWG criteria. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dL); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dL); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 22.57 |
DOR was measured as time in months from date of first documentation of response, VGPR or better, and ORR (CR+PR (including sCR and VGPR) or better, to date of first documented PD among participants who responded to treatment. Response was assessed by investigator using IMWG Criteria. CR:negative immunofixation in serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and;<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR:CR plus normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. VGPR:serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours. PR:≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | months (Median) | |
---|---|---|
VGPR or better | ORR | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | NA | 21.65 |
Laboratory parameters included chemistry and hematology. An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. An AE was graded as per NCI CTCAE. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Platelet count decreased | Neutrophil count decreased | White blood cell count decreased | Lymphocyte count decreased | Alanine aminotransferase increased | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Lipase increased | Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 7 | 6 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Vital signs included temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. An AE was graded as per NCI CTCAE. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Hypertension | Hypotension | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 1 | 1 |
DOR: Time from first documentation of CR/PR/VGPR to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PR:>=50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% to <200 mg/24-hour or >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/ >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if >=30% at Baseline/ >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR: serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR:negative immunofixation on serum + urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PD:serum M-component increase >=0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase >=200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell >=10%/development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 14.3 |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 14.8 |
OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause, up to 3 years are reported. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | NA |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 18.8 |
Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), or complete response (CR) based on laboratory results and IRC assessment using modified IMWG criteria. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when baseline value >=30% and; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5 % plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 41 |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 38 |
PFS: Time from randomization to first occurrence of confirmed progressive disease (PD) as assessed by investigator by International Myeloma Working Group(IMWG) response criteria/death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD requires following: Increase of >=25 % from nadir in: Serum M component (increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dl]); Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 milligram [mg]/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new/increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (>11.5mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 4.8 |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 7.1 |
TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PD required 1 of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (increase must be >=0.5 g/dl; Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 mg/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: Bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (>11.5 mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 5.1 |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 8.4 |
Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of PR/VGPR/CR. Per IMWG criteria, PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M-protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when Baseline value >=30% and; if present at Baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 1.1 |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 2.0 |
Healthcare resources used during medical encounters included hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hospitalizations | Emergency Room Stays | Outpatient Visits | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 23 | 11 | 32 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 16 | 9 | 29 |
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The physical domain consisted of 5 items covering participant's daily physical activities on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Raw scores were linearly transformed to a total score between 0-100, with a high score indicating better physical functioning. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 67.9 | 56.5 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 67.0 | 52.4 |
The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, side effects of treatment), and 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the future perspective scale indicate better perspective of the future, for the body image scale indicate better body image and for the disease symptoms scale indicate higher level of symptomatology. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease Symptoms: Baseline | Disease Symptoms: End of Treatment | Side Effects of Treatment: Baseline | Side Effects of Treatment: End of Treatment | Body Image: Baseline | Body Image: End of Treatment | Future Perspective: Baseline | Future Perspective: End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 72.4 | 68.9 | 81.4 | 77.8 | 82.9 | 83.7 | 67.5 | 64.0 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 73.2 | 73.5 | 81.0 | 74.4 | 81.5 | 75.0 | 58.8 | 57.9 |
The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a QOL scale. Most of the 30 items had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale. Each subscale raw score were linearly transformed to a total score between 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL. The Physical domain of the functional subscale is reported in the secondary outcome measure 7. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Status/QoL: Baseline | Global Health Status/QoL: End of Treatment | Role (Functional Scale): Baseline | Role (Functional Scale): End of Treatment | Emotional (Functional Scale): Baseline | Emotional (Functional Scale): End of Treatment | Cognitive(Functional Scale): Baseline | Cognitive (Functional Scale): End of Treatment | Social (Functional Scale): Baseline | Social (Functional Scale): End of Treatment | Fatigue (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Fatigue (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Nausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Nausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Pain (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Pain (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Dyspnea (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Dyspnea (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Insomnia (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Insomnia (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Appetite Loss (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Appetite Loss (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Constipation (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Constipation (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Diarrhea (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Diarrhea (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | Financial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): Baseline | Financial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 60.8 | 48.2 | 67.9 | 49.2 | 83.1 | 72.8 | 84.0 | 77.4 | 75.7 | 69.8 | 61.0 | 50.3 | 94.8 | 92.9 | 65.2 | 53.2 | 19.0 | 24.6 | 29.5 | 29.4 | 14.3 | 23.0 | 11.4 | 19.8 | 16.7 | 16.3 | 17.1 | 12.7 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 57.0 | 47.8 | 67.4 | 47.6 | 74.9 | 67.6 | 79.6 | 69.6 | 72.2 | 63.1 | 60.0 | 50.8 | 96.7 | 88.7 | 61.1 | 51.2 | 25.2 | 40.5 | 32.6 | 36.9 | 22.2 | 34.5 | 13.3 | 25.0 | 17.8 | 19.0 | 22.2 | 16.7 |
The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter (cm), vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores from all dimensions were combined into a single index score that was reported, where higher score was better quality of life. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 64.4 | 55.9 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 59.2 | 46.9 |
Duration of healthcare resources used during medical encounters including hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits was reported in days. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years
Intervention | days (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hospitalizations | Emergency Room Stays | Outpatient Visits | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 1.0 | 1.0 | 3.0 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 2.0 | 1.0 | 4.0 |
EQ-5D-5L comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, 5= extremely severe problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across the five dimensions. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mobility: 1 = I Have no Problems in Walking About | Mobility: 2 = I Have Slight Problems in Walking About | Mobility: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems in Walking About | Mobility: 4 = I Have Severe Problems in Walking About | Mobility: 5 = I am Unable to Walk About | Self-Care: 1 = I Have no Problems Washing or Dressing Myself | Self-Care: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Washing or Dressing Myself | Self-Care: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Washing or Dressing Myself | Self-Care: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Washing or Dressing Myself | Self-Care: 5 = I am Unable to Wash or Dress Myself | Usual Activities: 1 = I Have no Problems Doing my Usual Activities | Usual Activities: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Doing my Usual Activities | Usual Activities: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Doing my Usual Activities | Usual Activities: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Doing my Usual Activities | Usual Activities: 5 = I am Unable to do my Usual Activities | Pain/Discomfort: 1 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: 2 = I Have Slight Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: 3 = I Have Moderate Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: 4 = I Have Severe Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: 5 = I Have Extreme Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: 1 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: 2 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: 3 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: 4 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: 5 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort | |
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg | 9 | 12 | 11 | 8 | 1 | 21 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 10 | 9 | 12 | 7 | 3 | 8 | 10 | 15 | 6 | 2 | 19 | 13 | 6 | 1 | 2 |
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg | 5 | 6 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 13 | 6 | 0 | 6 | 8 | 11 | 2 | 0 |
Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days
Intervention | mg/m² weekly (Number) |
---|---|
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone) | 400 |
The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. Adverse events will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A grade 3 event is one that is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Phase I/II, Cohort A | 36 |
Phase II, Cohort B | 16 |
The percentage of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone) | 35 |
The distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase I/II, Cohort A | NA |
Phase II, Cohort B | NA |
The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone) | 63 |
The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase I/II, Cohort A | NA |
Phase II, Cohort B | NA |
Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days
Intervention | mg weekly (Number) | |
---|---|---|
MTD of ixazomib | MTD of dexamethasone | |
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone) | 4 | 40 |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), as evaluated by an independent review committee according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PD was defined as ≥25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M component; participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels must be >10 mg/dL; participants without measurable serum, urine M-protein levels and FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cell percent must have been ≥10%; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size increase; hypercalcemia development. (NCT02181413)
Timeframe: Randomization up to End of treatment (EOT) (24 months); thereafter followed up every 4 weeks until progression of disease or death (to data cutoff: approximately 4 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 21.3 |
Ixazomib Citrate | 26.5 |
DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR [including sCR] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 26.0 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 21.7 |
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 46.9 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 30.9 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 78.3 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 71.5 |
Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 80.3 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 75.7 |
Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 53.6 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 51.6 |
Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17). (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 42.2 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 29.4 |
Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 48.1 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 39.0 |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 18.7 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 9.3 |
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 20.6 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 14.7 |
TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 22.4 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 17.6 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Index: Baseline | Global Health Index: End of Treatment | Physical Functioning: Baseline | Physical Functioning: EOT | Role Functioning: Baseline | Role Functioning: EOT | Emotional Functioning: Baseline | Emotional Functioning: EOT | Cognitive Functioning: Baseline | Cognitive Functioning: EOT | Social Functioning: Baseline | Social Functioning: EOT | Fatigue: Baseline | Fatigue: EOT | Pain: Baseline | Pain: EOT | Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline | Nausea and Vomiting: EOT | Dyspnea: Baseline | Dyspnea: EOT | Insomnia: Baseline | Insomnia: EOT | Appetite Loss: Baseline | Appetite Loss: EOT | Constipation: Baseline | Constipation: EOT | Diarrhea: Baseline | Diarrhea: EOT | Financial Difficulties: Baseline | Financial Difficulties: EOT | |
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 58.4 | -6.0 | 70.0 | -4.7 | 68.4 | -8.6 | 75.1 | -2.1 | 81.9 | -7.6 | 77.9 | -6.9 | 38.4 | 6.0 | 38.0 | 2.7 | 5.0 | 3.4 | 21.2 | 5.7 | 27.4 | 0.9 | 16.9 | 4.7 | 12.2 | -1.3 | 6.3 | 17.2 | 16.7 | 0.5 |
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Index: Baseline | Global Health Index: End of Treatment | Global Health Index: Last Follow-up | Physical Functioning: Baseline | Physical Functioning: EOT | Physical Functioning: Last Follow-up | Role Functioning: Baseline | Role Functioning: EOT | Role Functioning: Last Follow-up | Emotional Functioning: Baseline | Emotional Functioning: EOT | Emotional Functioning: Last Follow-up | Cognitive Functioning: Baseline | Cognitive Functioning: EOT | Cognitive Functioning: Last Follow-up | Social Functioning: Baseline | Social Functioning: EOT | Social Functioning: Last Follow-up | Fatigue: Baseline | Fatigue: EOT | Fatigue: Last Follow-up | Pain: Baseline | Pain: EOT | Pain: Last Follow-up | Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline | Nausea and Vomiting: EOT | Nausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-up | Dyspnea: Baseline | Dyspnea: EOT | Dyspnea: Last Follow-up | Insomnia: Baseline | Insomnia: EOT | Insomnia: Last Follow-up | Appetite Loss: Baseline | Appetite Loss: EOT | Appetite Loss: Last Follow-up | Constipation: Baseline | Constipation: EOT | Constipation: Last Follow-up | Diarrhea: Baseline | Diarrhea: EOT | Diarrhea: Last Follow-up | Financial Difficulties: Baseline | Financial Difficulties: EOT | Financial Difficulties: Last Follow-up | |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 56.4 | -6.0 | 16.7 | 67.3 | -6.2 | 0.0 | 64.4 | -8.6 | -16.7 | 75.3 | -6.1 | -25.0 | 81.6 | -5.8 | -50.0 | 75.3 | -7.9 | 0.0 | 39.5 | 6.7 | 22.2 | 38.5 | 3.8 | 0.0 | 6.0 | 0.6 | 33.3 | 23.7 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 30.5 | -0.5 | 33.3 | 15.3 | 6.5 | 0.0 | 13.5 | 2.2 | 33.3 | 8.1 | 10.8 | 0.0 | 18.6 | 1.3 | -33.3 |
The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease Symptoms: Baseline | Disease Symptoms: EOT | Side Effects of Treatment: Baseline | Side Effects of Treatment: EOT | Side Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-up | Body Image: Baseline | Body Image: EOT | Body Image: Last Follow-up | Future Perspective: Baseline | Future Perspective: EOT | Future Perspective: Last Follow-up | |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 30.41 | -2.58 | 17.97 | 4.43 | 37.04 | 79.48 | -5.38 | -33.3 | 60.26 | -2.75 | -11.11 |
The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease Symptoms: Baseline | Disease Symptoms: EOT | Disease Symptoms: Last Follow-up | Side Effects of Treatment: Baseline | Side Effects of Treatment: EOT | Body Image: Baseline | Body Image: EOT | Future Perspective: Baseline | Future Perspective: EOT | |
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 29.71 | -2.35 | 1.11 | 17.23 | 4.52 | 78.00 | -0.27 | 56.99 | 2.76 |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
TEAEs | SAEs | |
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 359 | 205 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 357 | 201 |
"Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now [current pain]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst)." (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline | EOT | |
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 345 | 145 |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 351 | 153 |
(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)
Intervention | μg/mL (Mean) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-Dose | Cycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-Dose | Cycle 1 Day 14, Pre-Dose | Cycle 2 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 2 Day 14, Pre-Dose | Cycle 3 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 4 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 5 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 6 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 7 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 8 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 9 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose | |
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)
Intervention | μg/mL (Mean) | |||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-Dose | Cycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-Dose | Cycle 1 Day 14, Pre-Dose | Cycle 2 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 2 Day 14, Pre-Dose | Cycle 3 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 4 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 5 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 6 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 7 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 8 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 9 Day 1, Pre-Dose | Cycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose | |
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 4.79 | 36.3 | 15.6 | 6.83 | 2.4 | 7.12 | 2.48 | 2.41 | 2.42 | 2.57 | 2.71 | 2.37 | 2.51 | 2.82 |
Duration of next-line therapy is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy coming after study treatment to the date of the last dose. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 14.0 |
Ixazomib | 8.7 |
High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying cytogenetic deletion (del)17, translocation [t](4;14), t(14;16). OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 48.3 |
Ixazomib | 37.3 |
OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 69.5 |
Ixazomib | 64.8 |
(NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 6.2 |
Ixazomib | 5.2 |
Bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were sent to a central laboratory and were assessed for MRD using flow cytometry. MRD negativity was defined as absence of MRD and MRD positivity was defined as presence of MRD. MRD was assessed by 8-color flow cytometry with the IMWG recommended sensitivity of 10^-5. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3 |
Ixazomib | 6 |
High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying del17, t(4;14), t(14;16). PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 9.6 |
Ixazomib | 10.1 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per IMWG criteria, PD is defined as, increase of 25% of lowest response value in one or more of following criteria: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/ deciliter (dL)); or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24-hour); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (FLC) levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); or bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute plasma cell percentage ≥10%); development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma; or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5mg/dL). (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 9.4 |
Ixazomib | 17.4 |
PFS2 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to objective PD on next-line treatment using IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to every 12 weeks until second PD or death (up to 88 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 50.3 |
Ixazomib | 51.3 |
Time to end of the next line of therapy is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of last dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy following study treatment. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 25.6 |
Ixazomib | 23.1 |
PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies NEC according to the MedDRA. A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the improvement date or the day before and after. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the improvement of event. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 81.0 |
Ixazomib | 64.0 |
TTNT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first dose of next-line antineoplastic therapy. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 16.1 |
Ixazomib | 22.1 |
TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, using IMWG criteria. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 9.6 |
Ixazomib | 17.8 |
PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies not elsewhere classified (NEC) according to the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the resolution date or the day before and after. Time to resolution was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the resolution date for resolved events. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months
Intervention | days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 196.0 |
Ixazomib | 451.0 |
ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | Cycle 6 Day 1 | Cycle 7 Day 1 | Cycle 8 Day 1 | Cycle 9 Day 1 | Cycle 10 Day 1 | Cycle 11 Day 1 | Cycle 12 Day 1 | Cycle 13 Day 1 | Cycle 14 Day 1 | Cycle 15 Day 1 | Cycle 16 Day 1 | Cycle 17 Day 1 | Cycle 18 Day 1 | Cycle 19 Day 1 | Cycle 20 Day 1 | Cycle 21 Day 1 | Cycle 22 Day 1 | Cycle 23 Day 1 | Cycle 24 Day 1 | Cycle 25 Day 1 | Cycle 26 Day 1 | |
Placebo | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.1 | -0.0 | 0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | Cycle 6 Day 1 | Cycle 7 Day 1 | Cycle 8 Day 1 | Cycle 9 Day 1 | Cycle 10 Day 1 | Cycle 11 Day 1 | Cycle 12 Day 1 | Cycle 13 Day 1 | Cycle 14 Day 1 | Cycle 15 Day 1 | Cycle 16 Day 1 | Cycle 17 Day 1 | Cycle 18 Day 1 | Cycle 19 Day 1 | Cycle 20 Day 1 | Cycle 21 Day 1 | Cycle 22 Day 1 | Cycle 23 Day 1 | Cycle 24 Day 1 | Cycle 25 Day 1 | Cycle 26 Day 1 | PFSFU- Visit 37 | PDFU- Visit 26 | |
Ixazomib | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.1 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | -0.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
"The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question How would you rate your overall health during the past week? are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS." (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 (cycle length=28 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 | Cycle 3 | Cycle 4 | Cycle 5 | Cycle 6 | Cycle 7 | Cycle 8 | Cycle 9 | Cycle 10 | Cycle 11 | Cycle 12 | Cycle 13 | Cycle 14 | Cycle 15 | Cycle 16 | Cycle 17 | Cycle 18 | Cycle 19 | Cycle 20 | Cycle 21 | Cycle 22 | Cycle 23 | Cycle 24 | Cycle 25 | Cycle 26 | |
Ixazomib | -0.1 | -1.2 | -0.6 | 0.6 | -1.5 | -0.7 | -0.4 | 0.1 | -1.6 | 0.2 | 0.3 | -0.5 | -1.1 | -0.7 | 0.5 | -0.2 | 1.7 | 1.1 | 0.4 | 1.3 | 1.0 | 0.9 | 2.3 | 0.3 | 0.9 |
Placebo | 1.7 | 2.1 | 1.5 | 1.8 | 1.0 | 3.1 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 3.9 | 3.9 | 4.2 | 3.1 | 2.2 | 2.5 | 2.4 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 1.1 | 1.5 | 1.6 | 2.1 | -0.3 | 0.0 | 2.8 |
Participant's frailty status is classified as fit, unfit or frail on the bases of 4 components: age, the Charlson comorbidity scoring system without age weighting, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. The sum of the 4 frailty scores equals the total frailty score. A total frailty score of 0 corresponds to a frailty status of fit; a total score of 1, to unfit; and a total score of 2 or more, to frail. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS will be measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months
Intervention | months (Median) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFS Based on Frailty Status of Fit | PFS Based on Frailty Status of Unfit | PFS Based on Frailty Status of Frail | OS Based on Frailty Status of Fit | OS Based on Frailty Status of Unfit | OS Based on Frailty Status of Frail | |
Ixazomib | 18.6 | 17.6 | 15.4 | NA | NA | 46.5 |
Placebo | 8.5 | 10.6 | 11.1 | NA | NA | 42.5 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. Participants with various types of known MRD status were pooled together for analysis of overall survival in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months
Intervention | months (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
PFS for Participants with Known MRD+ at Study Entry | PFS for Participants with Known MRD- at Study Entry | OS for Participants with Known MRD Status (MRD- Status, MRD+ Status) at Study Entry | |
Ixazomib | 16.9 | 40.5 | NA |
Placebo | 9.3 | NA | NA |
Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria based on IRC assessment. Best response included PR, VGPR and CR. PR= >=50% reduction of serum M protein and >=90% or <200 mg reduction urinary M protein in 24-hour, or >50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, or >50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if bone marrow plasma cells >30% and >50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas at baseline. VGPR= >90% reduction (<100 mg/24-hour) in serum M-protein + urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis. Complete response= >5% plasma cells in myelogram with absence of paraprotein in serum and urine according to immunofixation. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
PR | VGPR | CR | |
Ixazomib | 25 | 34 | 31 |
Placebo | 29 | 37 | 28 |
An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of ixazomib or placebo through 30 days after the last dose of ixazomib or placebo. A SAE means any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered medically significant. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 88 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
SAE | TEAE | |
Ixazomib | 24 | 92 |
Placebo | 17 | 82 |
Plasma concentrations of the complete hydrolysis product of ixazomib citrate (ixazomib) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (1 and 4 hours post-dose Day 1, Days 8 and 15 pre-dose); Cycle 2 and 5 (Days 1 and 8 pre-dose) and Cycles 3, 4, 6 to 10 (Day 1 pre-dose) (cycle length=28 days)
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 - 1 Hour Post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 1 - 4 Hours Post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 8 - Pre-dose | Cycle 1 Day 15 - Pre-dose | Cycle 2 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 2 Day 8 - Pre-dose | Cycle 3 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 4 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 5 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 5 Day 8 - Pre-dose | Cycle 6 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 7 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 8 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 9 Day 1 - Pre-dose | Cycle 10 Day 1 - Pre-dose | |
Ixazomib | 19.353 | 12.698 | 1.683 | 2.828 | 1.958 | 3.217 | 2.252 | 2.363 | 2.328 | 4.547 | 2.503 | 2.585 | 2.606 | 2.566 | 2.686 |
CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR assessed by an IRC relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population during the treatment period. Percentage of participants with CR, as assessed by IMWG disease assessment criteria were reported. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % plasma cells (PC's) in bone marrow. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 14 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 26 |
Duration of response was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of first documented progression (PD) for responders, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 37.5 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 50.6 |
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. High risk category includes t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17) abnormalities. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 43.1 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 39.0 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR + partial response (PR) + very good partial response (VGPR) (including sCR) or better relative to the ITT population during treatment period. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % PC's in bone marrow. PR was defined as ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% along with ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR was defined as ≥90% in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24. sCR is defined as stringent complete response. Percentages are rounded off to nearest whole numbers. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 80 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 82 |
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis are censored at the date last known to be alive. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | NA |
Ixazomib + LenDex | NA |
Pain response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of at least a 30% reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic use for 2 consecutive measurements > 28 days apart, were reported. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 51.3 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 50.5 |
The absence of minimal residual disease (MRD negativity) was tested in all participants who achieve a CR and maintained it until Cycle 18, using bone marrow aspirates. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 18 (cycle length = 28 days)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 50 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 59 |
SRE is defined as new fractures [including vertebral compression fractures], irradiation of or surgery on bone, or spinal cord compression. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)
Intervention | percentage of partcipants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 14 |
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 10 |
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 28 |
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 25 |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease based on central laboratory results and IMWG criteria as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 17.5 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 22.4 |
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria whichever occurs first. PD required one of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute % must be >10%; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 79 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 21.8 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 35.3 |
PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documentation of disease progression on the subsequent line of anticancer therapy, as assessed by the investigator in accordance with IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 52.2 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 63.2 |
Time to pain progression was assessed as the time from randomization to the date of initial progression classification. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by 2 consecutive evaluations (To qualify as progression, the participant must have a BPI-SF worst pain score > 4 during pain progression): 1) a ≥ 2 point and 30% increase from Baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or 2) a 25% or more increase in analgesic use from Baseline without a decrease in BPI-SF worst pain score from Baseline. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 47.1 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | NA |
Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 26.8 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 45.8 |
Time to response was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PR or better, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + LenDex | 1.87 |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 1.02 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale was used to assess HRQOL in cancer participants and contains 30 items. Subscale with individual items include physical functioning items 1-5, role functioning items 6-7, emotional functioning items 21-24, cognitive functioning items 20, 25, social functioning items 26-27, quality of life items 29-30, fatigue items 10, 12, 18, nausea and vomiting items 14-15, pain items 9, 19, dyspnoea item 8, insomnia item 11, appetite loss item 13, constipation item 16, diarrhoea item 17, financial difficulties item 28. Raw scores were converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status scale, higher scores represent better HRQOL; whereas for the symptom scales lower scores represent better HRQOL. Positive change in functional and global health status scale indicated improvement; negative change for the symptom scales indicates improvement. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 9 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Status/QoL: Baseline | Global Health Status/QoL: End of Treatment | Physical Functioning: Baseline | Physical Functioning: End of Treatment | Role Functioning: Baseline | Role Functioning: End of Treatment | Emotional Functioning: Baseline | Emotional Functioning: End of Treatment | Cognitive Functioning: Baseline | Cognitive Functioning: End of Treatment | Social Functioning: Baseline | Social Functioning: End of Treatment | Fatigue: Baseline | Fatigue: End of Treatment | Pain: Baseline | Pain: End of Treatment | Nausea and Vomiting: Baseline | Nausea and Vomiting: End of Treatment | Dyspnoea: Baseline | Dyspnoea: End of Treatment | Insomnia: Baseline | Insomnia: End of Treatment | Appetite Loss: Baseline | Appetite Loss: End of Treatment | Constipation: Baseline | Constipation: End of Treatment | Diarrhoea: Baseline | Diarrhoea: End of Treatment | Financial Difficulties: Baseline | Financial Difficulties: End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 56.4 | -4.1 | 61.4 | 0.3 | 56.5 | -1.8 | 72.6 | -0.5 | 78.3 | -5.1 | 69.5 | -2.5 | 40.8 | 4.5 | 42.5 | -3.5 | 8.1 | 1.6 | 24.0 | 2.8 | 34.3 | -1.1 | 25.5 | 3.4 | 24.9 | -5.7 | 6.7 | 18.3 | 12.3 | 0.8 |
Placebo + LenDex | 55.2 | -2.2 | 60.0 | 1.7 | 54.9 | -0.3 | 73.5 | -2.4 | 77.8 | -3.2 | 69.1 | -2.9 | 44.6 | -2.3 | 45.6 | -5.5 | 7.1 | -0.5 | 26.2 | -3.6 | 30.3 | -1.5 | 25.4 | -1.2 | 25.9 | -7.1 | 8.2 | 10.7 | 12.5 | 2.0 |
EORTC QLQ-MY20 was a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. The scale has 20 questions. Subscale and individual items include future perspective items 18-20, body image item 17, disease symptoms items 1-6, side effects of treatment items 7-16. Raw scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher score is better quality of life. Positive change indicates improvement. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 9 years
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Disease Symptoms: Baseline | Disease Symptoms: End of Treatment | Side-Effects: Baseline | Side-Effects: End of Treatment | Body Image: Baseline | Body Image: End of Treatment | Future Perspective: Baseline | Future Perspective: End of Treatment | |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 29.2 | -5.3 | 17.6 | 3.3 | 81.2 | -2.3 | 55.0 | 6.0 |
Placebo + LenDex | 30.3 | -3.1 | 18.0 | 1.7 | 81.7 | -7.8 | 57.3 | 4.4 |
(NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose at multiple timepoints up to 4 hours; Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 14, Cycles 2-3 Day 1 and Day 14, Cycles 4-11 Day 1 (Each cycle length = 28 days)
Intervention | nanograms per milliliter (Mean) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1 Hour Post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 1: 4 Hours Post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 14: Pre-dose | Cycle 2 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 2 Day 14: Pre-dose | Cycle 3 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 3 Day 14: Pre-dose | Cycle 4 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 5 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 6 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 7 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 8 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 9 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 10 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 11 Day 1: Pre-dose | Cycle 12 Day 1: Pre-dose | |
Ixazomib | 44.745 | 16.253 | 7.867 | 2.664 | 8.521 | 2.763 | 8.490 | 3.284 | 3.594 | 2.603 | 2.598 | 2.539 | 2.593 | 2.536 | 2.667 | 2.686 |
The laboratory values assessment included serum chemistry and hematology. The Serum chemistry assessment included blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, bilirubin (total), urate, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphate, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide (CO2), magnesium, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Hematology assessment included hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet (count), leukocytes with differential neutrophils (ANC). Participants with abnormal serum chemistry laboratory values reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of any agent in the study drug regimen and through 30 days after the last dose of any agent in the study drug regimen. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Hypokalaemia | Blood creatinine increased | Hypophosphataemia | Hypomagnesaemia | Hyponatraemia | Hyperglycaemia | Hypocalcaemia | Hyperkalaemia | Alanine aminotransferase increased | Iron deficiency | Hypercalcaemia | Creatinine renal clearance decreased | Hypoalbuminaemia | Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Hyperuricaemia | Anaemia | Thrombocytopenia | Neutropenia | Neutrophil count decreased | Platelet count decreased | Lymphopenia | Febrile neutropenia | Leukopenia | International normalised ratio increased | Pancytopenia | Iron deficiency anaemia | White blood cell count decreased | Lymphocyte count decreased | |
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 39 | 16 | 9 | 15 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 58 | 24 | 39 | 18 | 15 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 |
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 33 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 53 | 34 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 33 | 12 | 3 | 11 | 8 | 16 | 12 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 7 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 52 | 14 | 48 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 3 |
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 16 | 9 | 2 | 8 | 7 | 4 | 13 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 57 | 15 | 36 | 11 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale score ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated normal activity and 5 indicated death. The data is reported for those categories where at least 1 participant had worst post-baseline value for each ECOG score. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 0 | Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 1 | Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 2 | Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 3 | Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 0 | Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 1 | Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 2 | Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 3 | Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 4 | Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 1 | Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 2 | Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 3 | Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 4 | |
Ixazomib + LenDex | 23 | 52 | 23 | 10 | 1 | 104 | 57 | 9 | 4 | 8 | 35 | 11 | 3 |
Placebo + LenDex | 23 | 57 | 20 | 2 | 1 | 96 | 72 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 28 | 7 | 2 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
TEAEs | SAEs | |
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 191 | 125 |
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 163 | 119 |
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles) | 189 | 119 |
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles) | 160 | 105 |
12-lead ECG were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 15 minutes in supine position. Change from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings that is QT interval - Fridericia's correction formula at pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 were reported. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | milliseconds (msec) (Mean) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD | -10.0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 6.3 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 6.0 |
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8 or Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD | NA |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 213 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 511 |
DLT: any of adverse events (AEs), assessed by Investigator and/Sponsor at any dose, regimen, and judged not to be related to underlying disease/any previous/concomitant medication/concurrent condition during first cycle of study treatment. DLT was confirmed by Safety Monitoring Committee. DLTs: Grade (Gr) greater than/equal to (>=) 3 nonhematologic AE with exception of: Single laboratory values out of abnormal range; Gr3 diarrhea persisting less than or equal to [<=] 72 hour (hr); Nausea and vomiting <= 72 hr; Transient Gr3 fatigue, local reactions, flu-like symptoms <= 72 hr; Gr3 nonrecurrent skin toxicity; Asymptomatic Gr >= 3 lipase/amylase elevation. Any Gr >= 4 hematologic AE: Gr >= 3 febrile neutropenia with Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1000 per cube millimeter and temperature of >38.3 Celsius (°C); Gr >= 3 thrombocytopenia; Gr4 thrombocytopenia lasting >7 days. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD | 1 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 1 |
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Day 29 up to 20.1 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0 |
Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | hour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week | 2000 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 3300 |
Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week | 153 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 215 |
Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, and coagulation. Number of participants with shifts from baseline (Grade <3) to >= Grade 3 were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Hematology | Chemistry | Coagulation | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 2 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 3 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 4 | 3 | 0 |
Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0.000 | -0.005 |
Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0.000 | 0.010 | 0.000 |
Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | Cycle 6 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | -0.010 | -0.010 |
Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | gram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean) |
---|---|
End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0.100 |
Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | gram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0.000 | 0.100 | 1.223 |
Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | gram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 6 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | -0.113 | 0.107 | 0.050 | 0.100 | 0.678 |
Change from baseline in urine M-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | milligrams per day (mg/day) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 26.50 | 67.00 |
Change from baseline in urine M-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | milligrams per day (mg/day) (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1 | Cycle 3 Day 1 | Cycle 4 Day 1 | Cycle 5 Day 1 | Cycle 6 Day 1 | End of Study Intervention | |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 25.25 | 256.00 | -130.00 | 268.00 | 3320.00 | 610.50 |
Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), Pre-dose, 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): Pre-dose | Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 2 hours post-dose | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0.26 | 0.25 |
Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), Pre-dose, 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15) (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): Pre-dose | Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 2 hours post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 6 hours post-dose | |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0.364 | 0.202 | 0.178 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0.31 | 0.299 | 0.22 |
ECOG performance status measured to assess participant's performance status on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair for more than 50 percent of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5 = dead. ECOG performance status was reported in terms of number of participants with shifts in score from baseline value vs worst post-baseline value (that is [i.e.] highest score). (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 5 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 5 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 5 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 5 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 5 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 0 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 1 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 2 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 3 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 4 | Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 5 | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
OR is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IMWG Criteria: sCR: CR (negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow); normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: >= 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by >= 90%/to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a >= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first dose of study treatment up to 18.2 months
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Stringent Complete Response | Complete Response | Very good Partial Response | Partial Response | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Participants with TEAEs | Participants with TRAEs | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 2 | 2 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 4 | 3 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 4 | 3 |
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in increased Body Temperature (degree Celsius [°C]) were reported by using criteria: Baseline temperature (temp.) less than (<) 37°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and greater than or equal to (>=)3°C; Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. 39-<40°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change <1°C | Baseline temp.<37°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C | Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C | Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change >=3°C | Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change <1°C | Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C | Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C | Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change >=3°C | Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change <1°C | Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C | Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C | Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change >=3°C | Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change <1°C | Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C | Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C | Baseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change >=3°C | Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change <1°C | Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°C | Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°C | Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change >=3°C | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) maximal Respiration Rate (RR) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS RR <20 breaths per minute (breaths/min), on TR change (ch) =<5 breaths/min, >5 - =<10 breaths/min and >10 breaths/min. Ic./Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min, >5 - =<10 breaths/min and >10 breaths/min. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ic. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min | Ic.BS RR<20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - = <10 breaths/min | Ic. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min | Ic. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min | IC.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min | Ic. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min | Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min | Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min | Dc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min | Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min | Dc.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/min | Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline (BS) in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeter of mercury [mmHg]) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP <140/<90 mmHg, on maximal treatment (TR) change =<20 mmHg, >20 - =<40 mmHg and >40 mmHg; Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP >=140/>=90 mmHg, on maximal TR change =<20 mmHg, >20 - =<40 mmHg and >40 mmHg. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Ic. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Dc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Ic. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg,on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHg | Dc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg | |
M3258 10 mg QD | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. Single dose Pd data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose), 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 hours post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 1: 6 hours post-dose | Cycle 1 Day 1: 24 hours post-dose | |
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week | 0.308 | 0.337 | 0.387 |
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week | 0.370 | 0.178 | 0.262 |
MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | unitless (Mean) |
---|---|
1.68 mg/m^2 | 2.64 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 1.45 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 2.25 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 1.19 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 2.25 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 2.19 |
PI naïve | 1.97 |
Carfilzomib | 2.37 |
A Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition Parameter. There were no subjects in the Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis Set for the 2.23 mg/m^2 cohort, so PD tables do not include that arm. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | Percentage of inhibition (Mean) |
---|---|
0.24 mg/m^2 | NA |
0.48 mg/m^2 | NA |
0.80 mg/m^2 | NA |
1.20 mg/m^2 | NA |
1.68 mg/m^2 | NA |
2.23 mg/m^2 | NA |
2.97 mg/m^2 | NA |
3.95 mg/m^2 | NA |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | NA |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | NA |
PI naïve | NA |
Carfilzomib | NA |
"An Adverse Event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.~A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: From the first dose through 30 days after last dose of ixazomib citrate or until the start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 354 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
0.24 mg/m^2 | 3 |
0.48 mg/m^2 | 3 |
0.80 mg/m^2 | 2 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 3 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 4 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 3 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 8 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 5 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 11 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 10 |
PI naïve | 6 |
Carfilzomib | 4 |
(NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | Hours (Mean) |
---|---|
0.24 mg/m^2 | NA |
0.48 mg/m^2 | NA |
0.80 mg/m^2 | NA |
1.20 mg/m^2 | NA |
1.68 mg/m^2 | NA |
2.23 mg/m^2 | NA |
2.97 mg/m^2 | NA |
3.95 mg/m^2 | NA |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | NA |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | NA |
PI naïve | NA |
Carfilzomib | NA |
Terminal elimination rate constant (λz) is the rate at which drugs are eliminated from the body and the values were used for calculation of T1/2. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | 1/hour (Mean) |
---|---|
0.80 mg/m^2 | 0.000 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 0.000 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 0.000 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 0.00 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 0.00 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 0.00 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 0.00 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 0.00 |
PI naïve | 0.01 |
Carfilzomib | 0.01 |
Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | hour (Mean) |
---|---|
0.80 mg/m^2 | 271.00 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 190.50 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 189.00 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 175.00 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 246.00 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 165.00 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 186.00 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 202.33 |
PI naïve | 123.90 |
Carfilzomib | 108.00 |
AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (tau) (AUC[0-tau]), where tau is the length of the dosing interval - 168 hours in this study). MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0,2,1,3,4,3,5,4,3) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=0,0,2,0,2,1,2,1,1,4,3,2) | |
0.24 mg/m^2 | NA | NA |
0.48 mg/m^2 | NA | NA |
0.80 mg/m^2 | NA | 398.50 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | NA | NA |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 258.00 | 663.00 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 598.00 | 868.00 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 1269.67 | 3100.00 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 1371.25 | 1460.00 |
Carfilzomib | 813.67 | 2075.00 |
PI naïve | 750.25 | 1549.00 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 1793.33 | 3690.00 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 854.20 | 1777.75 |
Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3) | |
0.24 mg/m^2 | 3.010 | 3.64 |
0.48 mg/m^2 | 2.91 | 4.64 |
0.80 mg/m^2 | 5.75 | 6.89 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 15.10 | 17.90 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 13.83 | 17.63 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 29.05 | 9.24 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 65.46 | 100.55 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 123.95 | 134.00 |
Carfilzomib | 83.73 | 55.10 |
PI naïve | 77.70 | 118.05 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 75.92 | 50.46 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 110.43 | 93.68 |
Neurotoxicity is graded using participant responses to 11 functional questions on a 5-point scale, where 0=Not at all and 4=Very much, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecology Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, Version 4.0(14). Neurotoxicity subscale is a sum of 11 reversed item scores where each original score is transformed as (4 - score). The highest possible score is 44, and a higher score indicates more neurotoxicity. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and End of Study (Up to 354 days)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=2,3,3,3,4,3,7,4,9,8,6,4) | End of Study (n=3,3,2,1,1,3,4,3,8,5,4,3) | |
0.24 mg/m^2 | 36.00 | 25.00 |
0.48 mg/m^2 | 40.33 | 40.67 |
0.80 mg/m^2 | 42.00 | 38.50 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 36.00 | 35.00 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 39.50 | 42.00 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 36.80 | 36.00 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 33.14 | 36.00 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 38.50 | 33.33 |
Carfilzomib | 32.00 | 27.33 |
PI naïve | 38.00 | 37.00 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 38.44 | 33.88 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 33.73 | 27.24 |
"Responses were based on International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Complete Response (CR)=Negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Partial Response (PR)= reduction in M-Protein ≥50% in serum and ≥90% in 24-hour urine. If M-protein unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference of involved and uninvolved Free Light Chain (FLC). If M-protein and FLC unmeasurable, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required, if baseline bone marrow plasma cell ≥30%. And ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Minimal Response (MR)= 25-49% reduction in serum paraprotein for 6 weeks. 50-89% reduction in 24 hour urinary light chain excretion for 6 weeks. For Non-secretory myeloma patients, 25-49 % reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow and trephine biopsy for a 6 weeks. 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Up to 354 days
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
CR + PR | CR + PR + MR | |
0.24 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
0.48 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
0.80 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 25 | 25 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 25 | 25 |
Carfilzomib | 25 | 25 |
PI naïve | 17 | 17 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 9 | 18 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 22 | 33 |
Tmax: Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time to Cmax. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1
Intervention | hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3) | Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3) | |
0.24 mg/m^2 | 1.50 | 1.07 |
0.48 mg/m^2 | 1.53 | 0.50 |
0.80 mg/m^2 | 1.52 | 1.83 |
1.20 mg/m^2 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
1.68 mg/m^2 | 1.52 | 1.27 |
2.23 mg/m^2 | 1.25 | 8.00 |
2.97 mg/m^2 | 1.00 | 1.25 |
3.95 mg/m^2 | 1.00 | 1.03 |
Carfilzomib | 1.42 | 1.03 |
PI naïve | 1.00 | 1.00 |
Relapsed and Refractory (RR) | 2.00 | 1.50 |
VELCADE-relapsed (VR) | 0.50 | 1.00 |
MTD of ixazomib will be determined by assessing adverse events and serious adverse events, clinical laboratory values, neurotoxicity grading, and vital sign measurements. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 1: Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 2.97 |
The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC(0-168) on Day 15 to the AUC(0-168) on Day 1. AUC(0-168) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15
Intervention | Ratio (Geometric Mean) |
---|---|
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 1.849 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 2.051 |
RP2D will be determined based on number and type of adverse event and serious adverse events, assessments of clinical laboratory values, neurotoxicity grading, and treatment discontinuation. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 1: Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 2.23 |
1-year survival rate is defined as the percentage of participants still alive at year after the first dose of stud drug. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: 1 year after first dose of study drug
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 92 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 92 |
DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response (CR + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD). Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) assessed by the investigatory using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or; 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 59 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 62 |
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the investigator using IMWG criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 88 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 88 |
OS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of death + 1 day. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death (up to 787 days)
Intervention | participants (Median) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
PFS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD or death. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 14.98 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
Time to Best Response was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented documentation of a confirmed response of partial response (PR) or better. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 2.96 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 3.01 |
TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD). (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented progressive disease (Up to 787 days)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA |
AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for Ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1) | Day 15 (n=2, 3, 3, 1) | |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA | 834.608 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 587.667 | 1083.998 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 923.484 | 1831.324 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA | NA |
Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15
Intervention | ng/mL (Geometric Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1) | Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1) | |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA | 11.999 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 22.303 | 31.368 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 94.779 | 53.517 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | NA | NA |
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Any AE | SAE | |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 3 | 2 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 3 | 3 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 6 | 1 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 3 | 2 |
Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15
Intervention | hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1) | Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1) | |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 1.020 | 4.165 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 1.520 | 1.000 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 1.060 | 1.015 |
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 0.250 | 2.000 |
Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: After Cycles 3, 6 and 9 (Up to 787 days)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
After 3 cycles | After 6 cycles | After 9 cycles | |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 35 | 47 | 57 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 37 | 48 | 58 |
Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR= CR + Normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. nCR=Positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease. Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. MR=25% to 49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50% to 89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12 (Up to 787 days)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR | sCR | VGPR | nCR | PR | MR | |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 20 | 6 | 39 | 2 | 67 | 6 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 23 | 10 | 38 | 2 | 65 | 6 |
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Grade 3 or Higher AEs | SAEs | AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation | |
Phase 2 :Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 76 | 40 | 8 |
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone | 75 | 43 | 8 |
MTD was highest dose of Ixazomib, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT was defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days;Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25,000/mm^3) for >7 days;Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc >500 millisecond [msec]);any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >2 weeks; other >=Grade 2 study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (21 days)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib (All Groups) | 2 |
The number of participants with any clinically significant changes in vital signs collected throughout the study that were reported as TEAEs. Measurement of vital signs, included oral temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 1 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 0 |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 |
The RP2D of Ixazomib was determined in Part 1 (dose escalation) on the basis of the totality of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic data observed in Cycle 1 and beyond. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 through Cycle 39 (Up to 28.3 months)
Intervention | mg/m^2 (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib (All Groups) | 2 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 135.00 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 126.50 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 129.33 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 105.88 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 92.70 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 115.85 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 123.06 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 124.93 |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 134.00 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose
Intervention | 1/hr (Mean) |
---|---|
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 0.005 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 0.005 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 0.006 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0.007 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 0.008 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0.006 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0.006 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 0.006 |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0.005 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Day 11 | |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 56.53 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 177.67 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 11 | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 509.00 | 1010.00 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 109.00 | 458.00 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 159.05 | 605.00 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 251.00 | 808.50 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 449.00 | 1435.60 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 416.50 | 1915.00 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 410.00 | 2297.20 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 451.64 | 903.85 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 351.00 | 937.86 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 11 | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 509.000 | 1010.000 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 3.383 | 56.533 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 20.700 | 177.667 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 109.000 | 458.000 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 159.050 | 605.000 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 251.000 | 808.500 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 449.000 | 1435.600 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 416.500 | 1915.000 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 410.000 | 2297.200 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 418.175 | 903.846 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 351.000 | 937.857 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 11 | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 26.600 | 27.200 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 2.120 | 2.837 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 10.190 | 8.857 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 22.200 | 31.650 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 29.000 | 56.500 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 21.100 | 101.100 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 68.167 | 85.420 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 117.933 | 105.450 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 85.600 | 109.660 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 58.900 | 59.871 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 59.343 | 61.800 |
Neurotoxicity was assessed as the number of participants with the TEAE of peripheral neuropathy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
Neuropathy Peripheral | Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 0 | 1 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 3 | 0 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 3 | 0 |
The number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout the study reported as TEAEs. Parameters assessed were hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Blood Creatinine Increased | Blood Urea Increased | White Blood Cell Count Decreased | Neutrophil Count Decreased | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased | Liver Function Test Increased | Blood Calcium Increased | Platelet Count Decreased | Haematocrit Decreased | Haemoglobin Decreased | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death;is life-threatening;requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization;results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;is a congenital anomaly/birth defect;or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. A TEAE is defined as an AE that occurs after administration of first dose of study drug and through 30 days after last dose of study drug or until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 2 | 2 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 3 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 3 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 3 | 2 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 3 | 2 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 3 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 7 | 5 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 4 | 3 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 6 | 3 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 20 | 14 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 12 | 6 |
ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or minimal response (MR) as assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg /24 h. MR=25-49% reduction in the serum monoclonal paraprotein maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 50-89% reduction in 24-h urinary light chain excretion, which still exceeds 200 mg/24 h, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; for participants with non-secretory myeloma only, 25-49% reduction in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate and on trephine biopsy, if biopsy is performed, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 through Cycle 115 (Up to 80.1 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
CR+PR | CR+PR+MR | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 33 | 33 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0 | 0 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 50 | 50 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 33 | 33 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 5 | 10 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 9 | 18 |
(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose
Intervention | hours (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Day 1 | Day 11 | |
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 1.500 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 1.100 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2 | 0.775 | 1.275 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2 | 0.775 | 0.500 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 1.000 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 0.667 |
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 0.832 |
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2 | 0.525 | 1.500 |
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 1.000 | 1.010 |
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2 | 0.617 | 0.583 |
Combined Response Rate is the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR), including stringent Complete Response (sCR), and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria during the Induction Phase (Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles). CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 27 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 24 |
DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the initiation of alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 Months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 32.2 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 36.6 |
DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 26.3 |
ORR is the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR or PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells (PC) in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved free light chain (FLC) levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28 day cycle (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Mean) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 49 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 23.5 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 23.0 |
PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 14.2 |
TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 30.9 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 32.2 |
TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 16.8 |
TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the initiation of alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 2.2 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 1.9 |
TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 2.1 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 885.167 | 1338.333 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 792.600 | 1226.600 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 518.167 | 1241.000 |
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of End of Treatment (EOT) (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL at EOT | Physical functioning, Change from BL at EOT | Role functioning, Change from BL at EOT | Emotional functioning, Change from BL at EOT | Cognitive functioning, Change from BL at EOT | Social functioning, Change from BL at EOT | Fatigue, Change from BL at EOT | Nausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at EOT | Pain, Change from BL at EOT | Dyspnea, Change from BL at EOT | Insomnia, Change from BL at EOT | Appetite Loss, Change from BL at EOT | Constipation, Change from BL at EOT | Diarrhea, Change from BL at EOT | Financial Difficulties, Change from BL at EOT | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | -5.50 | -6.00 | -7.67 | -5.00 | -5.33 | -11.33 | 5.11 | 3.33 | 5.00 | 10.00 | -6.00 | 4.67 | 2.00 | 6.00 | 4.00 |
EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 13 (Up to 1 year)
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL; Cycle 13 | Physical functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Role functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Emotional functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Cognitive functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Social functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Fatigue, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Nausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Pain, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Dyspnea, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Insomnia, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Appetite Loss, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Constipation, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Diarrhea, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | Financial Difficulties, Change from BL at Cycle 13 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 3.47 | 14.17 | 8.33 | 11.34 | 2.78 | 9.03 | -10.88 | -4.86 | -13.89 | -11.11 | -16.67 | -18.06 | -13.89 | -2.78 | 4.17 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | -5.43 | 17.97 | 6.52 | 2.54 | -7.25 | -11.59 | -6.76 | -4.35 | -10.87 | -7.25 | -10.14 | -7.25 | -5.80 | 5.80 | 1.45 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose
Intervention | nanogram/mL (ng/mL) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 64.283 | 53.145 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 46.600 | 62.280 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 47.400 | 52.229 |
"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any AE | Grade 3 or Higher AEs | AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation | AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction | SAEs | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 35 | 27 | 9 | 11 | 17 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 34 | 27 | 11 | 10 | 20 |
"An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any AE | Grade 3 or Higher AE | AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation | AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction | SAEs | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 72 | 49 | 19 | 30 | 30 |
"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Any AE | SAE | AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation | AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 22 | 6 | 1 | 5 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 20 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR + VGPR | CR | VGPR | PR | SD | PD | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 19 | 5 | 14 | 44 | 37 | 10 |
Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR + VGPR + PR | CR + VGPR | CR | VGPR | PR | SD | PD | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 82 | 36 | 15 | 21 | 67 | 18 | 0 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 71 | 32 | 12 | 21 | 59 | 18 | 6 |
Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CR + VGPR + PR | CR | VGPR | PR | SD | PD | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 79 | 12 | 15 | 67 | 12 | 0 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 71 | 9 | 15 | 62 | 18 | 3 |
Percentage of participants with Overall Response (CR + VGPR + PR), CR, VGPR and PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
CR + VGPR + PR | CR | VGPR | PR | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 75.0 | 16.7 | 20.8 | 37.5 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 85.7 | 19.0 | 28.6 | 38.1 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose
Intervention | hour (hr) (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 1.250 | 1.000 |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM) | 1.040 | 1.000 |
(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168) hours postdose
Intervention | hr (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 1 Day 15 | |
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM) | 1.225 | 2.000 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 685.9 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose
Intervention | hr*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 1746.0 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 37.57 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 57.57 |
DOR was defined as the length of time between the date of first documented response (PR, VGPR, or CR) and the date of first documented progressive disease (PD). According to IMWG criteria: CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From date of documentation of a confirmed response to date of progressive disease, (approximately 20 months)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 12.9 |
DLT was defined as any of the following AEs that were considered by investigator to be possibly related to therapy: 1. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 7 consecutive days; 2. Grade 3 neutropenia with fever and/or infection; 3. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at least 7 consecutive days; 4. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; 5. Platelet count <10,000/mm^3; 6. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or ≥Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; 7. Grade 3 or greater nausea and / or emesis despite the use of optimal anti-emetic prophylaxis; 8. Grade 3 or greater diarrhea that occurred despite maximal supportive therapy; 9. Any other Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia, <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; 10. A delay of >2 weeks in the subsequent cycle of treatment; 11. Other combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities ≥Grade 2 that, in the opinion of the investigator, required discontinuation of study drug. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (up to Day 28)
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 2 |
Percentage of participants who achieve or maintain any best response category during the treatment period were reported. Best response includes complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR). Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1, Day 1 to Cycle 3, Day 1 until disease progression (approximately 20 months)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 53.5 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 1.5 |
(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose
Intervention | hours (Median) |
---|---|
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 2.0 |
An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was a medically important event. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 43 | 18 |
Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were defined as any test results which were observed beyond the clinically acceptable limits as per the discretion of investigator. Clinical laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis tests. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Alanine Aminotransferase Increased | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased | Blood Creatinine Increased | Haemoglobin Decreased | Neutrophil Count Decreased | Platelet Count Decreased | Anaemia | Febrile Neutropenia | Neutropenia | Thrombocytopenia | Hyperglycaemia | Hypocalcaemia | Hypokalaemia | Hypomagnesaemia | Hyponatraemia | Hypophosphataemia | |
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 12 | 8 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
The number of participants who meet markedly abnormal criteria for vital signs, included diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature, respiratory rate, and body weight. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Grade 1 or 2 Hypertension | Grade 2 Hypotension | |
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone | 4 | 1 |
36 reviews available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glycine; Humans; Infections; Main | 2021 |
Efficacy of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in high-molecular-risk relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - case series and literature review.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethas | 2022 |
Efficacy of maintenance treatment in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Humans; Lenali | 2022 |
Proteasome Inhibitors: Harnessing Proteostasis to Combat Disease.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Humans; Lactones; Molecular Targeted Th | 2020 |
Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis.
Topics: Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Multiple Myeloma; Occupational Exposure; Risk Fa | 2020 |
Maintenance therapy and need for cessation studies in multiple myeloma: Focus on the future.
Topics: Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2020 |
Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Hypertension | 2022 |
Pharmacology differences among proteasome inhibitors: Implications for their use in clinical practice.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Interactions; Glycine; Humans; Mul | 2021 |
Recent progress in relapsed multiple myeloma therapy: implications for treatment decisions.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2017 |
Ixazomib: A Review in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma | 2017 |
Safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dru | 2017 |
Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drug Administr | 2018 |
The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; D | 2017 |
Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ixazomib citrate for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biological Availability; Boron | 2018 |
Triplet vs. doublet drug regimens for managing multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Histone Deacetylase Inhibit | 2018 |
Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor.
Topics: Animals; Biological Availability; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Develop | 2019 |
Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clinical Tri | 2018 |
Proteasome inhibitors for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Hematologic Dis | 2018 |
Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dexamethason | 2018 |
Proteasome inhibitors: structure and function.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Lymphoma | 2017 |
Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Glycine; Humans; Multiple | 2018 |
Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Human | 2018 |
Ixazomib - the first oral proteasome inhibitor.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron C | 2019 |
Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drugs, Investi | 2019 |
New approaches to management of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Ac | 2014 |
The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Animals; Boron Compounds; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drugs, Investigational; Glycine; Humans; Mul | 2015 |
Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II | 2015 |
Oral ixazomib maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Pro | 2016 |
Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine; | 2016 |
Ixazomib: First Global Approval.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clin | 2016 |
Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers.
Topics: Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Leukemia; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms; Ris | 2016 |
Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine; Humans; Mult | 2017 |
Magic year for multiple myeloma therapeutics: Key takeaways from the ASH 2015 annual meeting.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bor | 2017 |
Management of adverse events induced by next-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycine; Humans; Immunolog | 2017 |
Proteasome Inhibitors as a Potential Cause of Heart Failure.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Early D | 2017 |
[RENAL TUBULAR DISEASES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMINOACIDURIA].
Topics: Cystinosis; Cystinuria; Galactosemias; Genetics, Medical; Glycine; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Hu | 1964 |
47 trials available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma
Article | Year |
---|---|
A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202).
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethas | 2021 |
A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Huma | 2022 |
Ixazomib-based induction regimens plus ixazomib maintenance in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the phase II, multi-arm, randomized UNITO-EMN10 trial.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boro | 2021 |
Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron | 2022 |
All-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: final results of the phase II IFM 2013-06 study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len | 2022 |
Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cyclophosphamide; Dexamethaso | 2022 |
A phase 1/2 study of ixazomib in place of bortezomib or carfilzomib in a subsequent line of therapy for patients with multiple myeloma refractory to their last bortezomib or carfilzomib combination regimen.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine; | 2022 |
Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis.
Topics: Aged; Amyloidosis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cycl | 2022 |
Ixazomib for Desensitization (IXADES) in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Phase II Clinical Trial.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Multiple Myeloma | 2023 |
Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex | 2019 |
Quality of life is maintained with ixazomib maintenance in post-transplant newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The TOURMALINE-MM3 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; | 2020 |
Phase I Study of Selinexor, Ixazomib, and Low-dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Female; | 2020 |
Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex | 2020 |
Deepening responses associated with improved progression-free survival with ixazomib versus placebo as posttransplant maintenance in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Glycine; Hem | 2020 |
Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberr | 2020 |
Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Autografts; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Surv | 2020 |
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome | 2021 |
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome | 2021 |
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome | 2021 |
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome | 2021 |
Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bor | 2020 |
The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; | 2020 |
Ixazomib as Postinduction Maintenance for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: The Phase III TOURMALINE-MM4 Trial.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycine; Humans; Maintena | 2020 |
Ixazomib-Thalidomide-low dose dexamethasone induction followed by maintenance therapy with ixazomib or placebo in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation; results from the randomized phase II HOVON-1
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine; | 2020 |
Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2021 |
Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bor | 2021 |
A phase II trial of continuous ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: the Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium (AMaRC) 16-02 trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Boron Com | 2021 |
Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2017 |
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compound | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem | 2017 |
Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/refractory myeloma patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberrations | 2017 |
The role of ixazomib as an augmented conditioning therapy in salvage autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and as a post-ASCT consolidation and maintenance strategy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (ACCoRd [UK-MRA Myeloma XII] trial): study pro
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Sch | 2018 |
Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Absenteeism; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron C | 2018 |
Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2018 |
Phase 2 study of all-oral ixazomib, cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2019 |
All-oral ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Austr | 2019 |
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth | 2019 |
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth | 2019 |
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth | 2019 |
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth | 2019 |
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex | 2019 |
Management of Gastrointestinal Toxicities From Ixazomib: Tips to Curb Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea, and Constipation.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Constipation; Diarrhea; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; N | 2019 |
Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; | 2019 |
Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relati | 2014 |
Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Dose-Response Rela | 2014 |
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2014 |
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2014 |
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2014 |
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2014 |
Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Disease-Free Surviva | 2015 |
Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asia; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Female; Glycine; Humans; L | 2015 |
Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Dose-Res | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2016 |
A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Blood Proteins; Boron Compounds; Drug | 2016 |
Randomized phase 2 trial of ixazomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib | 2016 |
Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; | 2017 |
79 other studies available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma
Article | Year |
---|---|
Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime
Topics: Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Progression-Free Su | 2021 |
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cohort Studies | 2022 |
Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex | 2022 |
Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine; | 2022 |
[Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Mul | 2022 |
Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len | 2022 |
Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Japan; Multiple Myeloma; Pharmacovigilance | 2022 |
Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diarrhea; Exanthema; Glycine; Humans; Multiple | 2022 |
Blocking glycine utilization inhibits multiple myeloma progression by disrupting glutathione balance.
Topics: Bone Marrow; Bortezomib; Glutathione; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Tumor Microenvironment | 2022 |
An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycin | 2022 |
[Analysis of the efficacy and survival of ixazomib-containing regimens in patients with refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len | 2022 |
LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells.
Topics: Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Cell Line, Tumor; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma | 2023 |
Ixazomib-induced Sweet's syndrome.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Human | 2019 |
Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Mul | 2020 |
c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Co | 2020 |
Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol | 2020 |
Medication use evaluation of the financial and clinical implications of ixazomib compared to bortezomib in the outpatient setting.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron | 2021 |
Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethason | 2020 |
Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Protocols; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local; | 2020 |
Ixazomib Treatment of IgA Multiple Myeloma With Hyperviscosity Syndrome.
Topics: Aged; Blood Viscosity; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Syndrome; Treatme | 2020 |
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bor | 2020 |
Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Aminooxyacetic Acid; Apoptosis; Bone Marrow Cells; Case-Control Studies; Cell | 2020 |
[Systemic varicella-zoster infection during ixazomib-containing multiagent chemotherapy for multiple myeloma].
Topics: Boron Compounds; Chickenpox; Glycine; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Ne | 2020 |
Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Female; Glycine; | 2020 |
Ixazomib-associated tumor lysis syndrome in multiple myeloma: A case report.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Fatal Outcom | 2020 |
Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Human | 2021 |
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in multiply relapsed (≥2nd relapse) refractory myeloma: a multicenter real world UK experience.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len | 2021 |
Ixazomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: impact of 17p deletion and sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors from a real world data-set.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len | 2021 |
Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols | 2021 |
Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Co | 2021 |
Oxidatively modified low-density lipoproteins are potential mediators of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine; Granulocytes; Hum | 2021 |
Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 regulates cancer cell metabolism in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Glycine; Glycine Dehydrogenase (Decarb | 2021 |
Ixazomib inhibits myeloma cell proliferation by targeting UBE2K.
Topics: Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; | 2021 |
Real-world comparative effectiveness of triplets containing bortezomib (B), carfilzomib (C), daratumumab (D), or ixazomib (I) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US.
Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Borte | 2021 |
M3258 Is a Selective Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i) Delivering Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma Models.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids; | 2021 |
Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds | 2021 |
Up-front ixazomib in older patients with myeloma.
Topics: Aged; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma | 2021 |
The activity and safety of novel proteasome inhibitors strategies (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Lactones; Multiple | 2018 |
Therapy sequencing strategies in multiple myeloma: who, what and why?
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot | 2018 |
Spectrum and functional validation of PSMB5 mutations in multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Coho | 2019 |
Oral proteasome inhibitor maintenance for multiple myeloma.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome Inhibitors; Sili | 2019 |
[Ixazomib].
Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome Inhibitors | 2016 |
Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program.
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drug Resistanc | 2019 |
Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Costs; Female; Glycine; | 2019 |
Novel cell line models to study mechanisms and overcoming strategies of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.
Topics: A549 Cells; Amino Acid Substitution; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line, | 2019 |
Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cost-Benefit Analysis; | 2019 |
[Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma].
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Jap | 2019 |
Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice.
Topics: Animals; Disease Progression; Female; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inb | 2019 |
[Molecular targeting agents for multiple myeloma].
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib | 2012 |
Preclinical activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in Myeloma bone disease.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Resorption; Boron Compounds; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal; | 2014 |
Oral therapy for multiple myeloma: ixazomib arriving soon.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Drugs, Investigational; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome | 2014 |
Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Body | 2015 |
An oral proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Mult | 2014 |
Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agricultural Workers' Diseases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycine; | 2015 |
The combination of HDAC and aminopeptidase inhibitors is highly synergistic in myeloma and leads to disruption of the NFκB signalling pathway.
Topics: Aminopeptidases; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Azabicyclo Comp | 2015 |
Multiple Myeloma Gets Three New Drugs.
Topics: Administration, Oral; ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humaniz | 2016 |
FDA approves three different multiple myeloma drugs in one month.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Boron Compounds; Drug Approval; Drug Indu | 2016 |
Oral proteasome inhibitor with strong preclinical efficacy in myeloma models.
Topics: Aged; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell | 2016 |
Ixazomib for multiple myeloma.
Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma | 2016 |
Three new drugs for multiple myeloma.
Topics: ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Age | 2016 |
Multiple myeloma--translation of trial results into reality.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; B | 2016 |
Recent Data Supporting Novel Management Strategies for Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cyclophosph | 2016 |
Ixazomib cardiotoxicity: A possible class effect of proteasome inhibitors.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biopsy; Bo | 2017 |
Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res.
Topics: Agriculture; Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Multiple Myeloma | 2016 |
Visualising and Thinking and Interpreting. Response to the Burstyn and De Roos Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 1548-1559.
Topics: Agriculture; Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Multiple Myeloma | 2016 |
Ixazomib-induced thrombotic microangiopathy.
Topics: Aged; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Thrombotic Microangiopathies | 2017 |
Potent and Selective KDM5 Inhibitor Stops Cellular Demethylation of H3K4me3 at Transcription Start Sites and Proliferation of MM1S Myeloma Cells.
Topics: Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Crystallography, X-Ray; | 2017 |
Aminopeptidase inhibition as a targeted treatment strategy in myeloma.
Topics: Aminopeptidases; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Marrow Cells; Caspases; Cell Cycle; Cell Prolife | 2009 |
In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Biological Availability; Blotting, | 2011 |
Drugs: More shots on target.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Re | 2011 |
Investigational agent MLN9708/2238 targets tumor-suppressor miR33b in MM cells.
Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell S | 2012 |
Turnover rate of myeloma proteins in serum and urine determined after intravital labelling with glycine--1--C--14.
Topics: Blood Proteins; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Myeloma Proteins; Plasma; Plasma Cells | 1961 |
TURNOVER RATE OF PARAPROTEINS IN MYELOMATOSIS. STUDIES ON THE TURNOVER RATE OF SERUM PARAPROTEINS AFTER LABELLING IN VIVO, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO REPEATED TURNOVER-RATE DETERMINATIONS.
Topics: Blood Proteins; Carbon Isotopes; Glycine; Humans; Immunoelectrophoresis; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma | 1964 |
Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Agriculture; Cohort Studies; Female; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; Incidence | 2005 |
Glyphosate results revisited.
Topics: Agriculture; Animals; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; M | 2005 |
Effects of glucose supply on myeloma growth and metabolism in chemostat culture.
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Amino Acids; Cell Division; Cell Survival; Culture Media; Glucose; Glutamine | 1995 |
Catalytic cleavage of vasopressin by human Bence Jones proteins at the arginylglycinamide bond.
Topics: Arginine; Bence Jones Protein; Catalysis; Glycine; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; K | 1996 |
Ultracentrifugal studies of the aggregation of human immunoglobulin G by freezing and by heating.
Topics: Blood Protein Electrophoresis; Freezing; gamma-Globulins; Glycine; Hot Temperature; Humans; Multiple | 1968 |
An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity.
Topics: Alanine; Amino Acid Sequence; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antibodies; Antibody Specificity; Bence | 1970 |