Page last updated: 2024-10-18

glycine and Multiple Myeloma

glycine has been researched along with Multiple Myeloma in 162 studies

Multiple Myeloma: A malignancy of mature PLASMA CELLS engaging in monoclonal immunoglobulin production. It is characterized by hyperglobulinemia, excess Bence-Jones proteins (free monoclonal IMMUNOGLOBULIN LIGHT CHAINS) in the urine, skeletal destruction, bone pain, and fractures. Other features include ANEMIA; HYPERCALCEMIA; and RENAL INSUFFICIENCY.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma."9.51A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Chou, T; Fukunaga, S; Iida, S; Ikeda, T; Izumi, T; Komeno, T; Sasaki, M; Sugiura, K; Terui, Y, 2022)
"Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide."9.51Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial. ( Darif, M; Demarquette, H; Dimopoulos, MA; Doronin, V; Du, J; Fenk, R; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Lee, C; Leleu, X; Levin, MD; Mellqvist, UH; Montes, YG; Pompa, A; Quach, H; Ramasamy, K; Sati, H; Schjesvold, F; Vinogradova, O; Vorog, A, 2022)
"Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and is often used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone."9.51Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis. ( Bergsagel, PL; Bradt, EE; Buadi, FK; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonder, A; Gertz, MA; Go, RS; Gonsalves, W; Hayman, SR; Helgeson, DK; Hobbs, M; Hwa, YL; Kapoor, P; Kourelis, TV; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, BR; Larsen, JT; Leung, N; Muchtar, E; O'Brien, P; Rajkumar, SV; Siddiqui, M; Warsame, R, 2022)
"Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (IXA) in bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma (MM) and synergy with immunomodulatory drugs."9.41A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202). ( Bova-Solem, M; Carlisle, D; Efebera, YA; Hassoun, H; Laubach, JP; McCarthy, PL; Mulkey, F; Richardson, PG; Santo, K; Suman, VJ; Tuchman, SA; Voorhees, PM, 2021)
"Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients."9.41Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Benboubker, L; Facon, T; Karlin, L; Kumar, SK; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Offner, F; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Rifkin, RM; Rigaudeau, S; Rodon, P; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Twumasi-Ankrah, P; Venner, CP; Voog, E; White, DJ; Yoon, SS; Yung, G; Zhang, X, 2021)
"The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study (NCT02181413) demonstrated improved progression-free survival with ixazomib maintenance versus placebo post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients."9.34Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma. ( Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020)
"Ixazomib-revlimid-dexamethason showed significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."9.30Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Petzer, A; Poenisch, W; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2019)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing transplantation."9.30Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies. ( Berg, D; Byrne, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Echeveste Gutierrez, MA; Grzasko, N; Hofmeister, CC; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Laubach, JP; Liu, G; Lu, V; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H, 2019)
"The aim of this analysis was to assess healthcare resource utilization in the pivotal phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."9.27Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Hari, P; Lin, HM; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Zhu, Y, 2018)
"Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients."9.27Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bacco, AD; Baz, R; Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Byrne, C; Chari, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hofmeister, CC; Htut, M; Lebovic, D; Liao, E; Liedtke, M; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Rosenbaum, CA; Smith, SD; Vesole, DH, 2018)
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is approved in the United States, European Union and other countries, in combination with oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy."9.24Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Avivi, I; Berg, D; Einsele, H; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hájek, R; Hari, P; Kumar, S; Liberati, AM; Lin, J; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Masszi, T; Mateos, MV; Minnema, MC; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Romeril, K; Shustik, C; Spencer, A, 2017)
"The China Continuation study was a separate regional expansion of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following one to three prior therapies."9.24Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study. ( Chen, X; Du, X; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hou, J; Hua, Z; Jin, J; Ke, X; Li, H; Li, J; Liu, J; Lu, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; van de Velde, H; Wang, B; Wang, H; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, D, 2017)
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib has been approved by regulatory authorities around the world, including in the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study."9.24Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses. ( Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Kumar, S; Liu, R; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, S, 2017)
"We report the first clinical investigation conducted in Japan to confirm the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ixazomib alone and combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."9.24Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chou, T; Handa, H; Ishizawa, K; Kase, Y; Suzuki, K; Takubo, T, 2017)
"In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group)."9.22Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Baker, BW; Berg, DT; Buadi, FK; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Ganly, P; Garderet, L; Gimsing, P; Grzasko, N; Hansson, M; Hui, AM; Jackson, SR; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Lin, J; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Palumbo, A; Pour, L; Richardson, PG; Sandhu, I; Simpson, DR; Stoppa, AM; Touzeau, C; van de Velde, H, 2016)
"The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."9.19Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014)
"We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on the association between occupational exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM)."9.05Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis. ( Boffetta, P; Ciocan, C; Donato, F; Pira, E, 2020)
"Ixazomib is a new, orally administered, reversible proteasome inhibitor which is under investigation for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM)."9.01Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders. ( Rydygier, D; Smolewski, P, 2019)
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of carfilzomib-/ixazomib-containing combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."8.98Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Guo, H; Sun, X; Wang, B; Xu, W, 2018)
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor used in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA-LEN-DEX) and licensed for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."8.98Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. ( Armoiry, X; Clarke, A; Connock, M; Cummins, E; Melendez-Torres, GJ; Royle, P; Tsertsvadze, A, 2018)
"Knockdown of LINC00461 enhanced the therapeutic effects of ixazomib against multiple myeloma in part by the regulation of SNRPB2."8.31LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells. ( Deng, M; Liu, S; Peng, H; Wang, Z; Xiao, H; Xiao, X; Yuan, H; Zhang, G, 2023)
"Ixazomib is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received at least one previous therapy."8.12Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chudej, J; Guman, T; Hlebaskova, M; Kucerikova, M; Sokol, J; Stasko, J; Stecova, N; Valekova, L, 2022)
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance."8.12Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022)
"Maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) can improve outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, however, the neurotoxicity and parenteral route of bortezomib limit its long-term use."8.12Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study. ( Fan, S; Huang, Z; Li, X; Shen, M; Tang, R; Wang, Y; Zhan, X; Zhang, J; Zhong, Y, 2022)
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of total oral regimen containing ixazomib in multidrug-resistant relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)."8.12[Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma]. ( Fu, CC; Jin, S; Shang, JJ; Wang, J; Wu, DP; Yan, Z; Yao, Y, 2022)
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."8.12Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients. ( Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022)
"Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively."8.02Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime ( Alizadeh, H; Demeter, J; Hardi, A; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Masszi, T; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2021)
"We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice."8.02Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice. ( Bacovsky, J; Brozova, L; Capkova, L; Hajek, R; Heindorfer, A; Jelinek, T; Jindra, P; Jungova, A; Kessler, P; Krhovska, P; Machalkova, K; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Mistrik, M; Pavlicek, P; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Pour, L; Radocha, J; Skacel, T; Spicka, I; Stejskal, L; Stork, M; Straub, J; Sykora, M; Ullrychova, J, 2021)
"This study aimed to investigate real-world data of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."8.02Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis. ( Adachi, Y; Fuchida, SI; Hanamoto, H; Hino, M; Imada, K; Kanakura, Y; Kanda, J; Kaneko, H; Kosugi, S; Kuroda, J; Matsuda, M; Matsumura, I; Nakaya, A; Nomura, S; Ohta, K; Onda, Y; Shibayama, H; Shimazaki, C; Shimazu, Y; Shimura, Y; Takakuwa, T; Takaori-Kondo, A; Tanaka, H; Uchiyama, H; Uoshima, N; Yagi, H; Yamamura, R; Yoshihara, S, 2021)
"Lenalidomide is an important component of initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, either as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as first-line therapy with dexamethasone for patients' ineligible for ASCT (non-ASCT)."8.02Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada. ( Aslam, M; Atenafu, EG; Cherniawsky, H; Gul, E; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Kotb, R; LeBlanc, R; Louzada, ML; Masih-Khan, E; McCurdy, A; Reece, DE; Reiman, A; Sebag, M; Song, K; Stakiw, J; Venner, CP; White, D, 2021)
"This trial evaluated quality of life (QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 instruments in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during induction and maintenance therapy with eight cycles of ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, followed by 12 months of ixazomib maintenance therapy."7.96Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Hinke, A; Jelinek, T; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Meckl, A; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Nolte, S; Petzer, A; Pönisch, W; Pour, L; Rumpold, H; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2020)
"Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone."7.96Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study. ( Avivi, I; Chubar, E; Cohen, YC; Gatt, ME; Horowitz, N; Kreiniz, N; Lavi, N; Magen, H; Rouvio, O; Shaulov, A; Shvetz, O; Tadmor, T; Trestman, S; Vitkon, R; Ziv-Baran, T, 2020)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma."7.96Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Chen, S; He, Y; Hu, J; Jiang, D; Zhang, K; Zhu, Y; Zou, L, 2020)
"Over the past years, ixazomib has been increasingly explored for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."7.96Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Guo, SL; Li, Z; Wang, WL, 2020)
"Objective-To investigate cystathionine β synthase (CBS)/hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to identify its effect on the proliferation of U266 cells."7.96Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis. ( Huang, B; Kuang, L; Li, J; Xiao, F; Zhang, M; Zheng, D, 2020)
"US community sites are enrolling non-transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with no evidence of progressive disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based therapy to receive IRd (up to 39 cycles or until progression or toxicity)."7.96Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib. ( Aiello, J; Birhiray, RE; Boccia, R; Bogard, K; Charu, V; Cherepanov, D; Demers, B; Ferrari, RH; Girnius, S; Jhangiani, HS; Kambhampati, S; Lu, V; Lyons, R; Manda, S; Noga, SJ; Rifkin, RM; Whidden, P; Yasenchak, CA; Yimer, HA, 2020)
"Ixazomib-Revlimid-Dexamethasone is an all-oral treatment protocol for multiple myeloma with a manageable tolerability profile which was available through a named patient program for Hungarian patients from December 2015 to April 2017."7.91Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program. ( Alizadeh, H; Bátai, Á; Deák, B; Demeter, J; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Pető, M; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2019)
"This study analyzed the cost utility on the use of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD), lenalidomide/dexamethasone (RD), bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) for patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (rrMM)."7.91Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Cai, H; Li, N; Liu, M; Zhang, L; Zheng, B, 2019)
"Ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has been demonstrated to significantly improve progression-free survival(PFS)in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)."7.91[Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma]. ( Araki, T; Fujitani, Y; Miura, A; Ohta, K; Takakuwa, T; Takeoka, Y; Yamamura, R, 2019)
" We examine the contribution of the method to the debate surrounding risk of multiple myeloma and glyphosate use and propose that its application contributes to a more balanced weighting of evidence."7.83Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. ( Burstyn, I; De Roos, AJ, 2016)
"A previous publication of 57,311 pesticide applicators enrolled in the US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) produced disparate findings in relation to multiple myeloma risks in the period 1993-2001 and ever-use of glyphosate (32 cases of multiple myeloma in the full dataset of 54,315 applicators without adjustment for other variables: rate ratio (RR) 1."7.81Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data. ( Sorahan, T, 2015)
"Frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, mainly because of a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity."7.01Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study. ( Bilgin, YM; de Graauw, NCHP; de Waal, EGM; Durdu-Rayman, N; Geerts, PAF; Kentos, A; Klein, SK; Levin, MD; Ludwig, I; Nasserinejad, K; Nijhof, IS; Oosterveld, M; Silbermann, MH; Soechit, S; Sohne, M; Sonneveld, P; Stege, CAM; Thielen, N; Timmers, GJ; van de Donk, NWCJ; van der Klift, M; van der Spek, E; van Kampen, RJW; Vekemans, MC; Zweegman, S, 2021)
" Fourteen patients (9%) discontinued IRd due to adverse events/toxicity in the absence of disease progression."6.94Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Aitchison, R; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jenner, MW; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Kothari, J; Kotsopoulou, M; Maouche, N; Minarik, J; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Ramasamy, K; Terpos, E; Vallance, GD; Zomas, A, 2020)
" In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures."6.94Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study. ( Bao, L; Chen, B; Ding, K; Fu, C; Hua, L; Huang, Y; Li, B; Li, J; Liu, P; Luo, J; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, W; Wu, G; Xia, Z; Xu, T; Yang, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhou, X, 2020)
"Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib."6.94The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote ( Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020)
" Weekly IRd, followed by ixazomib maintenance, was highly active with acceptable toxicity, enabling long-term administration with no evidence of cumulative toxicities."6.90Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2019)
"Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention."6.82Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Z; Li, R; Ling, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhong, J, 2022)
" Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between ixazomib plasma exposure (area under the curve/day; derived from individual apparent clearance values from a published population pharmacokinetic analysis) and safety/efficacy outcomes (hematologic [grade ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2] or non-hematologic [grade ≥ 2 vs ≤ 1] adverse events [AEs], and clinical benefit [≥stable disease vs progressive disease]) using phase 1 data in relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820; N = 44)."6.82Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study. ( Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016)
" PK and adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a single 3 mg dose of ixazomib."6.82A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis. ( Badros, A; Berdeja, J; Chari, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Hui, AM; Kukreti, V; Lipe, B; Qian, M; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, X, 2016)
"This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, in patients with myeloma who have limited prior exposure to bortezomib."6.80Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, FK; Chanan-Khan, A; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Hwa, L; Kapoor, P; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, B; Laumann, K; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Rivera, CE; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Thompson, MA; Witzig, TE, 2015)
"Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor."6.79Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014)
" In terms of adverse reactions, our analysis revealed higher incidences of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 7."6.72Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. ( Chen, H; Shao, C; Sun, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, C, 2021)
"Ixazomib is a boron-containing selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor that demonstrated antimyeloma activity with excellent safety profile."6.58Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Moreau, P; Touzeau, C, 2018)
" Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the (i) pharmacology and dosing of ixazomib, (ii) the efficacy and safety data from clinical studies, (iii) highlight the various novel combinations that have been reported, and (iv) give an overview of the ongoing studies with ixazomib."6.58Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma. ( Abeykoon, JP; Kapoor, P; Zanwar, S, 2018)
"Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are among the backbones of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment; however, their long-term use can be limited by parenteral administration and treatment-related toxicities."6.58Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Ferrari, RH; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Lonial, S; O'Donnell, EK; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Voorhees, P; Zweegman, S, 2018)
"Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs."6.53Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Azab, AK; Ghazarian, RN; Kusdono, HD; Luderer, MJ; Muz, B; Ou, M, 2016)
"Ixazomib is an investigational, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor."6.52The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Anderson, KC; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2015)
"Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug."5.72An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022)
"TOURMALINE-MM1 was a global study that demonstrated a significant improvement in progression-free survival with ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone compared with placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone, in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma."5.51A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Chou, T; Fukunaga, S; Iida, S; Ikeda, T; Izumi, T; Komeno, T; Sasaki, M; Sugiura, K; Terui, Y, 2022)
"Multiple myeloma (MM) patients typically receive several lines of combination therapy and first-line treatment commonly includes lenalidomide."5.51Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial. ( Darif, M; Demarquette, H; Dimopoulos, MA; Doronin, V; Du, J; Fenk, R; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Lee, C; Leleu, X; Levin, MD; Mellqvist, UH; Montes, YG; Pompa, A; Quach, H; Ramasamy, K; Sati, H; Schjesvold, F; Vinogradova, O; Vorog, A, 2022)
"The all-oral combination of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone (ICD) is well tolerated and effective in newly diagnosed and relapsed multiple myeloma (MM)."5.51Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results. ( Auner, HW; Brown, SR; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Kaiser, MF; Kendall, J; Meads, D; Morgan, GJ; Parrish, C; Roberts, S; Walker, K, 2022)
"Bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor (PI), has shown efficacy in the treatment of newly diagnosed and relapsed light chain (AL) amyloidosis, and is often used in combination with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone."5.51Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis. ( Bergsagel, PL; Bradt, EE; Buadi, FK; Dingli, D; Dispenzieri, A; Fonder, A; Gertz, MA; Go, RS; Gonsalves, W; Hayman, SR; Helgeson, DK; Hobbs, M; Hwa, YL; Kapoor, P; Kourelis, TV; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, BR; Larsen, JT; Leung, N; Muchtar, E; O'Brien, P; Rajkumar, SV; Siddiqui, M; Warsame, R, 2022)
"Glyphosate-treated wild-type mice developed benign monoclonal gammopathy with increased serum IgG, anemia, and plasma cell presence in the spleen and bone marrow."5.51Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice. ( Deng, Q; Gong, Z; Hu, H; Li, Y; Liu, M; Lu, Z; Ma, X; Wang, L; Xu-Monette, ZY; Young, KH; Zhang, S, 2019)
"Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (IXA) in bortezomib-resistant multiple myeloma (MM) and synergy with immunomodulatory drugs."5.41A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202). ( Bova-Solem, M; Carlisle, D; Efebera, YA; Hassoun, H; Laubach, JP; McCarthy, PL; Mulkey, F; Richardson, PG; Santo, K; Suman, VJ; Tuchman, SA; Voorhees, PM, 2021)
"Continuous lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd)-based regimens are among the standards of care in transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients."5.41Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Benboubker, L; Facon, T; Karlin, L; Kumar, SK; Lonial, S; Moreau, P; Offner, F; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Rifkin, RM; Rigaudeau, S; Rodon, P; Shibayama, H; Suzuki, K; Twumasi-Ankrah, P; Venner, CP; Voog, E; White, DJ; Yoon, SS; Yung, G; Zhang, X, 2021)
"Evaluating potential relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor gene expression patterns and mutational status was an exploratory objective of the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study (NCT01564537) of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) vs placebo-Rd in 722 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."5.34Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation. ( Avet-Loiseau, H; Bahlis, NJ; Berg, D; Dash, AB; Di Bacco, A; Li, B; Lin, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Shen, L; Zhang, J, 2020)
"The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled TOURMALINE-MM3 study (NCT02181413) demonstrated improved progression-free survival with ixazomib maintenance versus placebo post autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in multiple myeloma patients."5.34Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma. ( Beksaç, M; Czorniak, M; de Arriba de la Fuente, F; Dimopoulos, MA; Gulbrandsen, N; Hájek, R; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Li, C; Mateos, MV; Moreau, P; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; West, S, 2020)
"Ixazomib-revlimid-dexamethason showed significant activity in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."5.30Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Petzer, A; Poenisch, W; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2019)
"Ixazomib maintenance prolongs PFS and represents an additional option for post-transplant maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."5.30Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. ( Beksac, M; Chng, WJ; Dash, AB; Dimopoulos, MA; Gay, F; Goldschmidt, H; Gupta, N; Hajek, R; Iida, S; Kaiser, M; Labotka, R; Maisnar, V; Mateos, MV; Min, CK; Moreau, P; Morgan, G; Palumbo, A; Pluta, A; Rajkumar, SV; Schjesvold, F; Skacel, T; Spencer, A; Suryanarayan, K; Teng, Z; Weisel, KC; Zweegman, S, 2019)
"To evaluate the safety and efficacy of maintenance therapy with the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) not undergoing transplantation."5.30Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies. ( Berg, D; Byrne, C; Dimopoulos, MA; Echeveste Gutierrez, MA; Grzasko, N; Hofmeister, CC; Kumar, S; Labotka, R; Laubach, JP; Liu, G; Lu, V; Richardson, PG; San-Miguel, JF; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H, 2019)
"The aim of this analysis was to assess healthcare resource utilization in the pivotal phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."5.27Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Berg, D; Hari, P; Lin, HM; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Zhu, Y, 2018)
"Weekly ixazomib with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) is feasible and has shown activity in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients."5.27Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. ( Bacco, AD; Baz, R; Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Byrne, C; Chari, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hofmeister, CC; Htut, M; Lebovic, D; Liao, E; Liedtke, M; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Rosenbaum, CA; Smith, SD; Vesole, DH, 2018)
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is approved in the United States, European Union and other countries, in combination with oral lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd), for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma who have received at least one prior therapy."5.24Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Avivi, I; Berg, D; Einsele, H; Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hájek, R; Hari, P; Kumar, S; Liberati, AM; Lin, J; Lonial, S; Ludwig, H; Masszi, T; Mateos, MV; Minnema, MC; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Romeril, K; Shustik, C; Spencer, A, 2017)
"The China Continuation study was a separate regional expansion of the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) following one to three prior therapies."5.24Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study. ( Chen, X; Du, X; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hou, J; Hua, Z; Jin, J; Ke, X; Li, H; Li, J; Liu, J; Lu, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; van de Velde, H; Wang, B; Wang, H; Wu, D; Xu, Y; Zhang, X; Zhou, D, 2017)
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib has been approved by regulatory authorities around the world, including in the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who have received at least one prior therapy, based on the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study."5.24Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses. ( Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Kumar, S; Liu, R; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, S, 2017)
"We report the first clinical investigation conducted in Japan to confirm the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of ixazomib alone and combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone (Rd) in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma."5.24Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chou, T; Handa, H; Ishizawa, K; Kase, Y; Suzuki, K; Takubo, T, 2017)
"In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 722 patients who had relapsed, refractory, or relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma to receive ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (ixazomib group) or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone (placebo group)."5.22Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma. ( Bahlis, NJ; Baker, BW; Berg, DT; Buadi, FK; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Ganly, P; Garderet, L; Gimsing, P; Grzasko, N; Hansson, M; Hui, AM; Jackson, SR; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Lin, J; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Palumbo, A; Pour, L; Richardson, PG; Sandhu, I; Simpson, DR; Stoppa, AM; Touzeau, C; van de Velde, H, 2016)
"The oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib is under phase 3 clinical investigation in multiple myeloma (MM) in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone."5.20Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study. ( Chim, CS; Chng, WJ; Esseltine, DL; Goh, YT; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Hui, AM; Kim, K; Lee, JH; Min, CK; Venkatakrishnan, K; Wong, RS; Yang, H, 2015)
"The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is a highly effective therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma."5.19Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Estevam, J; Gupta, N; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Hui, AM; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, V; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2014)
"We carried out a systematic review and meta-analysis of epidemiologic studies on the association between occupational exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and multiple myeloma (MM)."5.05Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis. ( Boffetta, P; Ciocan, C; Donato, F; Pira, E, 2020)
"With ten years of follow-up since the advent of the modern paradigm of combination induction therapy, consolidative autologous stem-cell transplant, and lenalidomide maintenance, median survival for multiple myeloma has increased to almost 50% at 10 years."5.05Maintenance therapy and need for cessation studies in multiple myeloma: Focus on the future. ( Chung, DJ; Diamond, B; Lesokhin, AM; Maclachlan, K; Ola Landgren, C, 2020)
"Ixazomib is a new, orally administered, reversible proteasome inhibitor which is under investigation for the treatment of refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma (MM), systemic light chain amyloidosis (AL) and Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM)."5.01Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders. ( Rydygier, D; Smolewski, P, 2019)
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of carfilzomib-/ixazomib-containing combinations for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."4.98Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Guo, H; Sun, X; Wang, B; Xu, W, 2018)
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor used in combination with lenalidomide plus dexamethasone (IXA-LEN-DEX) and licensed for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma."4.98Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal. ( Armoiry, X; Clarke, A; Connock, M; Cummins, E; Melendez-Torres, GJ; Royle, P; Tsertsvadze, A, 2018)
"Since 2003, the US Food and Drug Administration approval of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, has changed the management of hematologic malignancies and dramatically improved outcomes for patients with multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma."4.95Proteasome inhibitors: structure and function. ( Annunziata, CM; Nunes, AT, 2017)
"This systematic review and meta-analysis rigorously examines the relationship between glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancer (LHC) including NHL, Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), multiple myeloma (MM), and leukemia."4.93Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers. ( Chang, ET; Delzell, E, 2016)
"Knockdown of LINC00461 enhanced the therapeutic effects of ixazomib against multiple myeloma in part by the regulation of SNRPB2."4.31LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells. ( Deng, M; Liu, S; Peng, H; Wang, Z; Xiao, H; Xiao, X; Yuan, H; Zhang, G, 2023)
"Ixazomib is approved for use in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who received at least one previous therapy."4.12Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Chudej, J; Guman, T; Hlebaskova, M; Kucerikova, M; Sokol, J; Stasko, J; Stecova, N; Valekova, L, 2022)
"Objective To evaluate the safety profile of ixazomib combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in clinical practice in Japan through an all-case post-marketing surveillance."4.12Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance. ( Chou, T; Hashimoto, M; Hiraizumi, M; Hoshino, M; Kakimoto, Y; Shimizu, K, 2022)
"Maintenance therapy with proteasome inhibitors (PIs) can improve outcomes of multiple myeloma (MM) patients, however, the neurotoxicity and parenteral route of bortezomib limit its long-term use."4.12Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study. ( Fan, S; Huang, Z; Li, X; Shen, M; Tang, R; Wang, Y; Zhan, X; Zhang, J; Zhong, Y, 2022)
"To investigate the efficacy and safety of total oral regimen containing ixazomib in multidrug-resistant relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)."4.12[Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma]. ( Fu, CC; Jin, S; Shang, JJ; Wang, J; Wu, DP; Yan, Z; Yao, Y, 2022)
"In this study, the addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide maintenance post-autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in 64 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma was evaluated on the basis of the observed benefit of lenalidomide-only maintenance in prior studies."4.12Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma. ( Bashir, Q; Feng, L; Huo, XJ; Lee, HC; Manasanch, EM; Morphey, A; Olsem, J; Orlowski, RZ; Patel, KK; Qazilbash, MH; Shah, JJ; Thomas, SK; Weber, DM, 2022)
"Ixazomib is an orally available proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma with adverse effects such as gastrointestinal symptoms, skin rashes, and thrombocytopenia reported in clinical trials and post-marketing surveillance, resulting in treatment discontinuation."4.12Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database. ( Fujiwara, M; Muroi, N; Shimizu, T; Uchida, M; Uesawa, Y; Yamaoka, K, 2022)
"Ixazomib is an oral proteasome inhibitor approved in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."4.12Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients. ( Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Labotka, R; Srimani, JK; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2022)
"Ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone was confirmed to be an effective and safe combination for relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma, and one-sixth of the treated patients were able to receive it for several years, effectively."4.02Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime ( Alizadeh, H; Demeter, J; Hardi, A; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Masszi, T; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2021)
"In the past decade, several new therapies have been approved for use in multiple myeloma, including the novel oral agent, ixazomib."4.02Medication use evaluation of the financial and clinical implications of ixazomib compared to bortezomib in the outpatient setting. ( Fajardo, S; Zink, KA, 2021)
"We have performed a head to head comparison of all-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) versus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (RD) in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the routine clinical practice."4.02Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice. ( Bacovsky, J; Brozova, L; Capkova, L; Hajek, R; Heindorfer, A; Jelinek, T; Jindra, P; Jungova, A; Kessler, P; Krhovska, P; Machalkova, K; Maisnar, V; Minarik, J; Mistrik, M; Pavlicek, P; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Pour, L; Radocha, J; Skacel, T; Spicka, I; Stejskal, L; Stork, M; Straub, J; Sykora, M; Ullrychova, J, 2021)
"This study aimed to investigate real-world data of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRd) therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."4.02Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis. ( Adachi, Y; Fuchida, SI; Hanamoto, H; Hino, M; Imada, K; Kanakura, Y; Kanda, J; Kaneko, H; Kosugi, S; Kuroda, J; Matsuda, M; Matsumura, I; Nakaya, A; Nomura, S; Ohta, K; Onda, Y; Shibayama, H; Shimazaki, C; Shimazu, Y; Shimura, Y; Takakuwa, T; Takaori-Kondo, A; Tanaka, H; Uchiyama, H; Uoshima, N; Yagi, H; Yamamura, R; Yoshihara, S, 2021)
"Ixazomib is a selective, effective, and reversible inhibitor of 20S proteasome and is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma."4.02Ixazomib inhibits myeloma cell proliferation by targeting UBE2K. ( Chen, X; Chen, Y; Dong, Z; Huang, J; Ma, L; Su, J; Tian, L; Wang, Q; Xiao, P, 2021)
"Lenalidomide is an important component of initial therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma, either as maintenance therapy post-autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) or as first-line therapy with dexamethasone for patients' ineligible for ASCT (non-ASCT)."4.02Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada. ( Aslam, M; Atenafu, EG; Cherniawsky, H; Gul, E; Jimenez-Zepeda, VH; Kotb, R; LeBlanc, R; Louzada, ML; Masih-Khan, E; McCurdy, A; Reece, DE; Reiman, A; Sebag, M; Song, K; Stakiw, J; Venner, CP; White, D, 2021)
"This trial evaluated quality of life (QoL) using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the EORTC QLQ-MY20 instruments in 90 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during induction and maintenance therapy with eight cycles of ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone, followed by 12 months of ixazomib maintenance therapy."3.96Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population. ( Egle, A; Einsele, H; Greil, R; Gunsilius, E; Hajek, R; Hinke, A; Jelinek, T; Knop, S; Krenosz, KJ; Lechner, D; Ludwig, H; Meckl, A; Melchardt, T; Niederwieser, D; Nolte, S; Petzer, A; Pönisch, W; Pour, L; Rumpold, H; Schreder, M; Weisel, K; Willenbacher, W; Zojer, N, 2020)
"In the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) showed different magnitudes of progression-free survival (PFS) benefit vs placebo-Rd according to number and type of prior therapies, with greater benefit seen in patients with >1 prior line of therapy or 1 prior line of therapy without stem cell transplantation (SCT)."3.96c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma. ( Avet-Loiseau, H; Badola, S; Bahlis, NJ; Berg, D; Cavo, M; Di Bacco, A; Esseltine, DL; Ganly, P; Keats, JJ; Kumar, SK; Langer, C; Li, B; Lin, J; Luptakova, K; Masszi, T; Moreau, P; Munshi, NC; Pour, L; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Shen, L; van de Velde, H; Viterbo, L; Zhang, J, 2020)
"Ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor (PI), has been approved for the treatment of relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone, based on the TOURMALINE-MM1 phase 3 trial, which demonstrated the efficacy and safety of this all-oral triplet, compared with lenalidomide-dexamethasone."3.96Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study. ( Avivi, I; Chubar, E; Cohen, YC; Gatt, ME; Horowitz, N; Kreiniz, N; Lavi, N; Magen, H; Rouvio, O; Shaulov, A; Shvetz, O; Tadmor, T; Trestman, S; Vitkon, R; Ziv-Baran, T, 2020)
"To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma."3.96Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Chen, S; He, Y; Hu, J; Jiang, D; Zhang, K; Zhu, Y; Zou, L, 2020)
"Over the past years, ixazomib has been increasingly explored for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM)."3.96Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Guo, SL; Li, Z; Wang, WL, 2020)
"Objective-To investigate cystathionine β synthase (CBS)/hydrogen sulfide (H2S) signaling in multiple myeloma (MM) patients and to identify its effect on the proliferation of U266 cells."3.96Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis. ( Huang, B; Kuang, L; Li, J; Xiao, F; Zhang, M; Zheng, D, 2020)
"US community sites are enrolling non-transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (MM) with no evidence of progressive disease after 3 cycles of bortezomib-based therapy to receive IRd (up to 39 cycles or until progression or toxicity)."3.96Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib. ( Aiello, J; Birhiray, RE; Boccia, R; Bogard, K; Charu, V; Cherepanov, D; Demers, B; Ferrari, RH; Girnius, S; Jhangiani, HS; Kambhampati, S; Lu, V; Lyons, R; Manda, S; Noga, SJ; Rifkin, RM; Whidden, P; Yasenchak, CA; Yimer, HA, 2020)
"Ixazomib-Revlimid-Dexamethasone is an all-oral treatment protocol for multiple myeloma with a manageable tolerability profile which was available through a named patient program for Hungarian patients from December 2015 to April 2017."3.91Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program. ( Alizadeh, H; Bátai, Á; Deák, B; Demeter, J; Illés, Á; Kosztolányi, S; Mikala, G; Nagy, Z; Pető, M; Plander, M; Schneider, T; Szendrei, T; Szomor, Á; Varga, G; Váróczy, L, 2019)
"Experimental data on resistance mechanisms of multiple myeloma (MM) to ixazomib (IXA), a second-generation proteasome inhibitor (PI), are currently lacking."3.91Novel cell line models to study mechanisms and overcoming strategies of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma. ( Bargou, RC; Brünnert, D; Chatterjee, M; Driessen, C; Goyal, P; Heiden, R; Kirner, S; Kraus, M; Stühmer, T, 2019)
"This study analyzed the cost utility on the use of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone (IRD), lenalidomide/dexamethasone (RD), bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone (VTD), or bortezomib/dexamethasone (VD) for patients with refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma (rrMM)."3.91Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Cai, H; Li, N; Liu, M; Zhang, L; Zheng, B, 2019)
"Ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, has been demonstrated to significantly improve progression-free survival(PFS)in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma(RRMM)."3.91[Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma]. ( Araki, T; Fujitani, Y; Miura, A; Ohta, K; Takakuwa, T; Takeoka, Y; Yamamura, R, 2019)
"We sought to evaluate the activity and safety of these novel proteasome inhibitors (PIs) (carfilzomib, ixazomib, oprozomib and marizomib) containing regimens (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (R/RMM)."3.88The activity and safety of novel proteasome inhibitors strategies (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Ma, H; Su, Z; Sun, F; Zhao, N, 2018)
"In the last few weeks, the FDA approved three new therapies for multiple myeloma: ixazomib, the first oral proteasome inhibitor; and daratumumab and elotuzumab, two monoclonal antibodies that target CD38 and SLAMF7, respectively."3.83Multiple Myeloma Gets Three New Drugs. ( Poh, A, 2016)
" We examine the contribution of the method to the debate surrounding risk of multiple myeloma and glyphosate use and propose that its application contributes to a more balanced weighting of evidence."3.83Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. ( Burstyn, I; De Roos, AJ, 2016)
"Data were pooled from 226 adult patients with multiple myeloma, lymphoma or solid tumours in four phase 1 studies, in which ixazomib dosing (oral/intravenous, once/twice weekly) was based on BSA."3.81Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis. ( Esseltine, DL; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Venkatakrishnan, K; Zhao, Y, 2015)
"A previous publication of 57,311 pesticide applicators enrolled in the US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) produced disparate findings in relation to multiple myeloma risks in the period 1993-2001 and ever-use of glyphosate (32 cases of multiple myeloma in the full dataset of 54,315 applicators without adjustment for other variables: rate ratio (RR) 1."3.81Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data. ( Sorahan, T, 2015)
"The success of bortezomib therapy for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) led to the development of structurally and pharmacologically distinct novel proteasome inhibitors."3.77In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells. ( Anderson, KC; Chauhan, D; Kuhn, D; Orlowski, R; Raje, N; Richardson, P; Tian, Z; Zhou, B, 2011)
"Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying standard- or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) achieve similar complete response (CR) rates, but the later have inferior progression-free survival (PFS)."3.01Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma. ( Alameda, D; Alignani, D; Bargay, J; Blade, J; Burgos, L; Calasanz, MJ; Cedena, MT; Celay, J; Cordón, L; de la Rubia, J; Flores-Montero, J; Fresquet, V; Garcés, JJ; Garcia-Sanz, R; Goicoechea, I; Gutierrez, NC; Hernandez, MT; Krsnik, I; Lahuerta, JJ; Lara-Astiaso, D; Martin-Sanchez, J; Martinez-Climent, JA; Martinez-Lopez, J; Martinez-Martinez, R; Mateos, MV; Moraleda, JM; Orfao, A; Oriol, A; Paiva, B; Palomera, L; Puig, N; Ramos, MM; Rios, R; Rodriguez, I; Rodriguez, S; Rosiñol, L; San Miguel, J; Sarra, J; Sarvide, S; Vidriales, MB; Vilas-Zornoza, A, 2021)
"Frail patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma have an inferior outcome, mainly because of a high discontinuation rate due to toxicity."3.01Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study. ( Bilgin, YM; de Graauw, NCHP; de Waal, EGM; Durdu-Rayman, N; Geerts, PAF; Kentos, A; Klein, SK; Levin, MD; Ludwig, I; Nasserinejad, K; Nijhof, IS; Oosterveld, M; Silbermann, MH; Soechit, S; Sohne, M; Sonneveld, P; Stege, CAM; Thielen, N; Timmers, GJ; van de Donk, NWCJ; van der Klift, M; van der Spek, E; van Kampen, RJW; Vekemans, MC; Zweegman, S, 2021)
" Fourteen patients (9%) discontinued IRd due to adverse events/toxicity in the absence of disease progression."2.94Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Aitchison, R; Dimopoulos, MA; Gavriatopoulou, M; Hajek, R; Jelinek, T; Jenner, MW; Kastritis, E; Katodritou, E; Kothari, J; Kotsopoulou, M; Maouche, N; Minarik, J; Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I; Pika, T; Plonkova, H; Ramasamy, K; Terpos, E; Vallance, GD; Zomas, A, 2020)
" In routine practice, few patients received ixazomib-based induction therapy due to reasons including (1) patients' preference on oral regimens, (2) concerns on adverse events (AEs) of other intravenous/subcutaneous regimens, (3) requirements for less center visits, and (4) fears of COVID-19 and other infectious disease exposures."2.94Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study. ( Bao, L; Chen, B; Ding, K; Fu, C; Hua, L; Huang, Y; Li, B; Li, J; Liu, P; Luo, J; Wang, L; Wang, S; Wang, W; Wu, G; Xia, Z; Xu, T; Yang, W; Yang, Y; Zhang, W; Zhou, X, 2020)
"Ixazomib is a next generation inhibitor of the 20S proteasome and is thought to be an effective treatment for those who have relapsed from bortezomib."2.94The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote ( Auner, HW; Bailey, L; Brown, S; Brudenell Straw, F; Cook, G; Cook, M; Dawkins, B; Flanagan, L; Hinsley, S; Kaiser, MF; McKee, S; Meads, D; Reed, S; Sherratt, D; Walker, K, 2020)
" Weekly IRd, followed by ixazomib maintenance, was highly active with acceptable toxicity, enabling long-term administration with no evidence of cumulative toxicities."2.90Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance. ( Berdeja, JG; Berg, D; Hamadani, M; Hari, P; Kaufman, JL; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Liao, E; Lonial, S; Niesvizky, R; Rajkumar, SV; Richardson, PG; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Vescio, R, 2019)
"Prolonged survival and expanded treatment options in myeloma patients have led to adverse events associated with treatment getting increased attention."2.82Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. ( Chen, Z; Li, R; Ling, Y; Zhao, Y; Zhong, J, 2022)
" Methods Logistic regression was used to investigate relationships between ixazomib plasma exposure (area under the curve/day; derived from individual apparent clearance values from a published population pharmacokinetic analysis) and safety/efficacy outcomes (hematologic [grade ≥ 3 vs ≤ 2] or non-hematologic [grade ≥ 2 vs ≤ 1] adverse events [AEs], and clinical benefit [≥stable disease vs progressive disease]) using phase 1 data in relapsed/refractory MM (NCT00963820; N = 44)."2.82Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study. ( Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Venkatakrishnan, K, 2016)
" PK and adverse events (AEs) were assessed after a single 3 mg dose of ixazomib."2.82A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis. ( Badros, A; Berdeja, J; Chari, A; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Harvey, RD; Hui, AM; Kukreti, V; Lipe, B; Qian, M; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H; Zhang, X, 2016)
"This phase 2 trial was designed to evaluate ixazomib, an orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor, in patients with myeloma who have limited prior exposure to bortezomib."2.80Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib. ( Bergsagel, PL; Buadi, FK; Chanan-Khan, A; Dispenzieri, A; Fonseca, R; Gertz, MA; Hwa, L; Kapoor, P; Kumar, SK; Lacy, MQ; LaPlant, B; Laumann, K; Mikhael, JR; Rajkumar, SV; Reeder, CB; Rivera, CE; Roy, V; Stewart, AK; Thompson, MA; Witzig, TE, 2015)
"Ixazomib is an investigational, orally bioavailable 20S proteasome inhibitor."2.79Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. ( Bensinger, WI; Berenson, JR; Berg, D; Di Bacco, A; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, SK; Niesvizky, R; Reeder, CB; Shou, Y; Yu, J; Zimmerman, TM, 2014)
" In terms of adverse reactions, our analysis revealed higher incidences of grade 3-4 thrombocytopenia (RR = 7."2.72Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis. ( Chen, H; Shao, C; Sun, C; Wang, Y; Zheng, C, 2021)
"Model-informed drug development (MIDD) was central to the development of the oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib, facilitating internal decisions (switch from body surface area (BSA)-based to fixed dosing, inclusive phase III trials, portfolio prioritization of ixazomib-based combinations, phase III dose for maintenance treatment), regulatory review (model-informed QT analysis, benefit-risk of 4 mg dose), and product labeling (absolute bioavailability and intrinsic/extrinsic factors)."2.61Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor. ( Berg, D; Diderichsen, PM; Gupta, N; Hanley, MJ; Ke, A; Labotka, R; Liu, G; Patel, C; Teng, Z; van de Velde, H; Venkatakrishnan, K; Yang, H, 2019)
"Ixazomib is a boron-containing selective and reversible proteasome inhibitor that demonstrated antimyeloma activity with excellent safety profile."2.58Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma. ( Moreau, P; Touzeau, C, 2018)
" Areas covered: This review provides an overview of the (i) pharmacology and dosing of ixazomib, (ii) the efficacy and safety data from clinical studies, (iii) highlight the various novel combinations that have been reported, and (iv) give an overview of the ongoing studies with ixazomib."2.58Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma. ( Abeykoon, JP; Kapoor, P; Zanwar, S, 2018)
"Proteasome inhibitors (PIs) are among the backbones of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment; however, their long-term use can be limited by parenteral administration and treatment-related toxicities."2.58Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Ferrari, RH; Kumar, SK; Laubach, JP; Lonial, S; O'Donnell, EK; Raje, N; Richardson, PG; Skacel, T; Voorhees, P; Zweegman, S, 2018)
"Multiple myeloma is a heterogeneous disease with a prognosis that varies with patient factors, disease burden, tumor biology, and treatments."2.55The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma. ( Barley, K; Barlogie, B; Chari, A; Cho, HJ; Jagannath, S; Lancman, G; Madduri, D; Moshier, E; Parekh, S; Tremblay, D, 2017)
" Areas covered: This review focuses on the safety data from clinical trials for the three approved PIs and how to manage adverse effects."2.55Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Lonial, S; Panjic, EH; Schlafer, D; Shah, KS, 2017)
" We focused on adverse events associated with such agents and described how they should be managed."2.55Management of adverse events induced by next-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma. ( Boccadoro, M; Bonello, F; Larocca, A; Salvini, M, 2017)
"Ixazomib is a second-generation PI with improved activity over other PIs."2.53Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Azab, AK; Ghazarian, RN; Kusdono, HD; Luderer, MJ; Muz, B; Ou, M, 2016)
"Ixazomib (Ninlaro(®)) is an orally bioavailable, reversible proteasome inhibitor developed by Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc."2.53Ixazomib: First Global Approval. ( Shirley, M, 2016)
"Ixazomib is an investigational, reversible 20S proteasome inhibitor."2.52The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Anderson, KC; Gupta, N; Hui, AM; Kumar, S; Laubach, JP; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; San Miguel, JF, 2015)
"Multiple myeloma is still an incurable disease with pattern of regression and remission followed by multiple relapses raising from the residual myeloma cells surviving even in the patients who achieve complete clinical response to treatment."2.50New approaches to management of multiple myeloma. ( Cavallo, F; Genadieva-Stavric, S; Palumbo, A, 2014)
"Ixazomib is an effective and welltolerated MM drug."1.72An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma. ( Goel, U; Kumar, S, 2022)
"This study evaluates real-life multiple myeloma (MM) patients receiving proteasome inhibitor (PI)-based treatments in the second or third therapy line in 2017 in Germany."1.56Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany. ( Gonzalez-McQuire, S; Lebioda, A; Poenisch, W; Rieth, A; Schoehl, M; Singh, M; Steinmetz, HT, 2020)
"We provide a real-world overview of multiple myeloma (MM) treatment patterns, outcomes and healthcare resource use (HRU) in Portugal."1.51Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal. ( Antunes, L; Bento, MJ; Chacim, S; Lefèvre, C; Pereira, M; Pereira, S; Rocha-Gonçalves, F; Zagorska, A, 2019)
"Glyphosate-treated wild-type mice developed benign monoclonal gammopathy with increased serum IgG, anemia, and plasma cell presence in the spleen and bone marrow."1.51Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice. ( Deng, Q; Gong, Z; Hu, H; Li, Y; Liu, M; Lu, Z; Ma, X; Wang, L; Xu-Monette, ZY; Young, KH; Zhang, S, 2019)
"Glyphosate is a broad-spectrum herbicide that is one of the most frequently applied pesticides in the world."1.33Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study. ( Alavanja, MC; Blair, A; De Roos, AJ; Dosemeci, M; Hoppin, JA; Rusiecki, JA; Sandler, DP; Svec, M, 2005)

Research

Studies (162)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19905 (3.09)18.7374
1990's2 (1.23)18.2507
2000's3 (1.85)29.6817
2010's85 (52.47)24.3611
2020's67 (41.36)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Hardi, A1
Varga, G2
Nagy, Z2
Kosztolányi, S2
Váróczy, L2
Plander, M2
Schneider, T2
Demeter, J2
Alizadeh, H2
Illés, Á2
Masszi, T5
Mikala, G3
Sokol, J1
Guman, T1
Chudej, J1
Hlebaskova, M1
Stecova, N1
Valekova, L1
Kucerikova, M1
Stasko, J1
Voorhees, PM1
Suman, VJ1
Tuchman, SA1
Laubach, JP8
Hassoun, H2
Efebera, YA1
Mulkey, F1
Bova-Solem, M1
Santo, K1
Carlisle, D1
McCarthy, PL1
Richardson, PG17
Iida, S3
Izumi, T1
Komeno, T1
Terui, Y1
Chou, T3
Ikeda, T1
Berg, D13
Fukunaga, S1
Sugiura, K1
Sasaki, M1
Kakimoto, Y1
Hoshino, M1
Hashimoto, M1
Hiraizumi, M1
Shimizu, K1
Shen, M1
Zhang, J4
Tang, R1
Wang, Y3
Zhan, X1
Fan, S1
Huang, Z1
Zhong, Y1
Li, X1
Mina, R1
Falcone, AP1
Bringhen, S2
Liberati, AM2
Pescosta, N1
Petrucci, MT2
Ciccone, G1
Capra, A1
Patriarca, F1
Rota-Scalabrini, D1
Bonello, F2
Musolino, C1
Cea, M1
Zambello, R1
Tacchetti, P1
Belotti, A1
Cellini, C1
Paris, L1
Grasso, M1
Aquino, S1
De Paoli, L1
De Sabbata, G1
Ballanti, S1
Offidani, M4
Boccadoro, M4
Monaco, F1
Corradini, P1
Larocca, A3
Chen, H1
Shao, C1
Sun, C1
Zheng, C1
Wang, J1
Shang, JJ1
Jin, S1
Yao, Y1
Yan, Z1
Wu, DP1
Fu, CC1
Patel, KK1
Shah, JJ1
Feng, L1
Lee, HC2
Manasanch, EM1
Olsem, J1
Morphey, A1
Huo, XJ1
Thomas, SK1
Bashir, Q1
Qazilbash, MH1
Weber, DM1
Orlowski, RZ1
Dimopoulos, MA10
Schjesvold, F4
Doronin, V1
Vinogradova, O1
Quach, H2
Leleu, X4
Montes, YG1
Ramasamy, K4
Pompa, A1
Levin, MD4
Lee, C1
Mellqvist, UH2
Fenk, R1
Demarquette, H1
Sati, H1
Vorog, A2
Labotka, R11
Du, J1
Darif, M1
Kumar, S9
Touzeau, C3
Perrot, A1
Roussel, M1
Karlin, L2
Benboubker, L2
Jacquet, C1
Mohty, M2
Facon, T2
Manier, S1
Chretien, ML1
Tiab, M1
Hulin, C1
Loiseau, HA1
Dejoie, T1
Planche, L1
Attal, M1
Moreau, P18
Szudy-Szczyrek, A1
Chocholska, S1
Bachanek-Mitura, O1
Czabak, O1
Mlak, R1
Szczyrek, M1
Muzyka-Kasietczuk, J1
Hus, M1
Auner, HW2
Brown, SR1
Walker, K2
Kendall, J1
Dawkins, B2
Meads, D2
Morgan, GJ3
Kaiser, MF2
Cook, M3
Roberts, S1
Parrish, C1
Cook, G4
Daniely, D1
Forouzan, E1
Spektor, TM1
Cohen, A1
Bitran, JD1
Chen, G1
Moezi, MM1
Bessudo, A1
Hrom, J1
Eshaghian, S1
Swift, RA1
Eades, BM1
Kim, C1
Lim, S1
Berenson, JR2
Yamaoka, K1
Fujiwara, M1
Uchida, M1
Uesawa, Y1
Muroi, N1
Shimizu, T2
Srimani, JK1
Diderichsen, PM2
Hanley, MJ6
Venkatakrishnan, K7
Gupta, N17
Muchtar, E1
Gertz, MA3
LaPlant, BR2
Buadi, FK3
Leung, N2
O'Brien, P1
Bergsagel, PL3
Fonder, A1
Hwa, YL2
Hobbs, M1
Helgeson, DK1
Bradt, EE1
Gonsalves, W2
Lacy, MQ4
Kapoor, P4
Siddiqui, M1
Larsen, JT1
Warsame, R1
Hayman, SR2
Go, RS2
Dingli, D2
Kourelis, TV1
Dispenzieri, A4
Rajkumar, SV11
Kumar, SK11
Xia, J1
Wu, X1
Du, W1
Zhu, Y3
Liu, X1
Liu, Z1
Meng, B1
Guo, J1
Yang, Q1
Wang, Q2
Feng, X1
Xie, G1
Shen, Y1
He, Y2
Xiang, J1
Wu, M1
An, G1
Qiu, L1
Jia, W1
Zhou, W1
Zhi, Y1
Bao, S1
Mao, J1
Chai, G1
Zhu, J1
Liu, C1
Chen, X3
Goel, U1
Yang, C1
Zhuang, JL1
Deng, M1
Yuan, H1
Peng, H1
Liu, S1
Xiao, X1
Wang, Z1
Zhang, G1
Xiao, H1
Wilson, N1
Reese, S1
Ptak, L1
Aziz, F1
Parajuli, S1
Jucaud, V1
Denham, S1
Mishra, A1
Cascalho, M1
Platt, JL1
Hematti, P1
Djamali, A1
Oka, S1
Ono, K1
Nohgawa, M1
Ludwig, H3
Pönisch, W1
Knop, S2
Egle, A2
Hinke, A1
Schreder, M2
Lechner, D2
Hajek, R9
Gunsilius, E2
Petzer, A2
Weisel, K3
Niederwieser, D2
Einsele, H4
Willenbacher, W2
Rumpold, H1
Pour, L5
Jelinek, T3
Krenosz, KJ2
Meckl, A1
Nolte, S1
Melchardt, T2
Greil, R2
Zojer, N2
Poenisch, W2
Goldschmidt, H3
Maisnar, V3
Spicka, I3
Abildgaard, N2
Rowlings, P1
Cain, L1
Romanus, D2
Suryanarayan, K4
Rajkumar, V2
Odom, D1
Gnanasakthy, A1
Dimopoulos, M1
Salcedo, M1
Lendvai, N1
Mastey, D1
Schlossman, J1
Hultcrantz, M1
Korde, N1
Mailankody, S1
Lesokhin, A1
Smith, E1
Shah, U1
Diab, V1
Werner, K1
Landau, H1
Lahoud, O1
Drullinsky, P1
Shah, G1
Chung, D1
Scordo, M1
Giralt, S1
Landgren, O1
Sherman, DJ1
Li, J4
Donato, F1
Pira, E1
Ciocan, C1
Boffetta, P1
Diamond, B1
Maclachlan, K1
Chung, DJ1
Lesokhin, AM1
Ola Landgren, C1
Di Bacco, A7
Bahlis, NJ5
Munshi, NC1
Avet-Loiseau, H3
Viterbo, L2
Ganly, P3
Cavo, M4
Langer, C2
Keats, JJ1
Lin, J5
Li, B3
Badola, S1
Shen, L2
Esseltine, DL5
Luptakova, K1
van de Velde, H6
Cohen, YC1
Magen, H1
Lavi, N1
Gatt, ME1
Chubar, E1
Horowitz, N1
Kreiniz, N1
Tadmor, T1
Trestman, S1
Vitkon, R1
Rouvio, O1
Shvetz, O1
Shaulov, A1
Ziv-Baran, T1
Avivi, I2
Terpos, E3
Maouche, N2
Minarik, J2
Ntanasis-Stathopoulos, I1
Katodritou, E2
Jenner, MW2
Plonkova, H2
Gavriatopoulou, M1
Vallance, GD2
Pika, T2
Kotsopoulou, M1
Kothari, J2
Kastritis, E2
Aitchison, R2
Zomas, A1
Zink, KA1
Fajardo, S1
Weisel, KC2
Chng, WJ5
Teng, Z7
Mateos, MV6
Dash, AB2
Zhang, K2
Zou, L1
Chen, S1
Jiang, D1
Hu, J1
Li, Z1
Guo, SL1
Wang, WL1
Kaiser, M2
Beksaç, M3
Gulbrandsen, N1
de Arriba de la Fuente, F1
West, S1
Spencer, A5
Czorniak, M1
Li, C1
Boiten, HJ1
Buijze, M1
Zweegman, S5
Goicoechea, I1
Puig, N2
Cedena, MT1
Burgos, L1
Cordón, L1
Vidriales, MB1
Flores-Montero, J1
Gutierrez, NC1
Calasanz, MJ1
Ramos, MM1
Lara-Astiaso, D1
Vilas-Zornoza, A1
Alignani, D1
Rodriguez, I1
Sarvide, S1
Alameda, D1
Garcés, JJ1
Rodriguez, S1
Fresquet, V1
Celay, J1
Garcia-Sanz, R1
Martinez-Lopez, J2
Oriol, A2
Rios, R1
Martin-Sanchez, J1
Martinez-Martinez, R1
Sarra, J1
Hernandez, MT1
de la Rubia, J1
Krsnik, I1
Moraleda, JM1
Palomera, L1
Bargay, J1
Martinez-Climent, JA1
Orfao, A1
Rosiñol, L1
Lahuerta, JJ1
Blade, J1
San Miguel, J1
Paiva, B1
Steinmetz, HT1
Singh, M1
Lebioda, A1
Gonzalez-McQuire, S1
Rieth, A1
Schoehl, M1
Zhang, M1
Huang, B1
Kuang, L1
Xiao, F1
Zheng, D1
Bao, L1
Xia, Z1
Wang, S1
Zhou, X1
Ding, K1
Zhang, W1
Yang, W1
Fu, C1
Chen, B1
Hua, L1
Wang, L2
Luo, J1
Yang, Y1
Xu, T1
Wang, W1
Huang, Y1
Wu, G1
Liu, P1
Nakayama, H1
Kato, J1
Kikuchi, T1
Okayama, M1
Kamiya, T1
Mizuno, K1
Okamoto, S1
Mori, T1
Manda, S1
Yimer, HA1
Noga, SJ1
Girnius, S1
Yasenchak, CA1
Charu, V1
Lyons, R1
Aiello, J1
Bogard, K1
Ferrari, RH2
Cherepanov, D2
Demers, B1
Lu, V2
Whidden, P1
Kambhampati, S1
Birhiray, RE1
Jhangiani, HS1
Boccia, R1
Rifkin, RM2
Hinsley, S1
Sherratt, D1
Bailey, L1
Reed, S1
Flanagan, L1
McKee, S1
Brudenell Straw, F1
Brown, S1
Garg, M2
Morgan, G4
Wang, B3
Palumbo, A6
Lonial, S8
Ling, Y1
Li, R1
Zhong, J1
Zhao, Y2
Chen, Z1
Jin, F1
Yang, M1
Chen, Y2
Jiang, L1
Liu, L1
Parrondo, RD1
Alegria, V1
Roy, V5
Sher, T1
Chanan-Khan, AA1
Ailawadhi, S2
Stege, CAM2
Haukas, E1
Schjesvold, FH1
Waage, A1
Leys, RBL1
Klein, SK2
Szatkowski, D1
Axelsson, P1
Hieu Do, T1
Knut-Bojanowska, D1
van der Spek, E2
Svirskaite, A1
Klostergaard, A1
Salomo, M1
Blimark, C1
Ypma, PF1
Poddighe, PJ1
Stevens-Kroef, M1
van de Donk, NWCJ3
Sonneveld, P2
Hansson, M3
van der Holt, B1
Kishore, B1
Boyd, K1
Bhatti, Z1
Bird, SA1
Chander, G1
Robinson, R1
Offer, M1
Peniket, A1
Dungarwalla, M1
Collings, F1
Bygrave, C1
Ziff, M1
Lawson, G1
De-Silva, D1
Cheesman, S1
Kyriakou, C1
Mahmood, S1
Papanikolaou, X1
Rabin, N1
Sachchithananthan, S1
Sive, J1
Wechalekar, A1
Yong, K3
Popat, R1
Radocha, J1
Jungova, A1
Straub, J1
Pavlicek, P1
Mistrik, M1
Brozova, L1
Krhovska, P1
Machalkova, K1
Jindra, P1
Stork, M1
Bacovsky, J1
Capkova, L1
Sykora, M1
Kessler, P1
Stejskal, L1
Heindorfer, A1
Ullrychova, J1
Skacel, T4
Takakuwa, T2
Yamamura, R2
Ohta, K2
Kaneko, H1
Imada, K1
Nakaya, A1
Fuchida, SI1
Shibayama, H2
Matsuda, M1
Shimazu, Y1
Adachi, Y1
Kosugi, S1
Uchiyama, H1
Tanaka, H1
Hanamoto, H1
Shimura, Y1
Kanda, J1
Onda, Y1
Uoshima, N1
Yagi, H1
Yoshihara, S1
Hino, M1
Shimazaki, C1
Takaori-Kondo, A1
Kuroda, J1
Matsumura, I1
Kanakura, Y1
Nomura, S1
Polusani, SR1
Cortez, V1
Esparza, J1
Nguyen, HN1
Fan, H1
Velagaleti, GVN1
Butler, MJ1
Kinney, MC1
Oyajobi, BO1
Habib, SL1
Asmis, R1
Medina, EA1
Abdollahi, P1
Vandsemb, EN1
Elsaadi, S1
Røst, LM1
Yang, R1
Hjort, MA1
Andreassen, T1
Misund, K1
Slørdahl, TS1
Rø, TB1
Sponaas, AM1
Moestue, S1
Bruheim, P1
Børset, M1
Dong, Z1
Su, J1
Huang, J1
Xiao, P1
Tian, L1
Ma, L1
Fogli, S1
Galimberti, S1
Gori, V1
Del Re, M1
Danesi, R1
Venner, CP2
Offner, F1
White, DJ1
Rigaudeau, S1
Rodon, P1
Voog, E1
Yoon, SS1
Suzuki, K2
Zhang, X3
Twumasi-Ankrah, P1
Yung, G1
Nasserinejad, K1
Bilgin, YM1
Kentos, A1
Sohne, M1
van Kampen, RJW1
Ludwig, I1
Thielen, N1
Durdu-Rayman, N1
de Graauw, NCHP1
de Waal, EGM1
Vekemans, MC1
Timmers, GJ1
van der Klift, M1
Soechit, S1
Geerts, PAF1
Silbermann, MH1
Oosterveld, M1
Nijhof, IS1
Davies, F2
Rifkin, R1
Costello, C2
Usmani, S1
Abonour, R1
Stull, DM1
Huang, H1
Berdeja, J2
Thompson, M1
Zonder, J1
Vela-Ojeda, J1
Farrelly, E1
Raju, A1
Blazer, M1
Chari, A4
Bergin, K1
Yuen, F1
Wallington-Beddoe, C1
Kalff, A1
Sirdesai, S1
Reynolds, J1
Sanderson, MP1
Friese-Hamim, M1
Walter-Bausch, G1
Busch, M1
Gaus, S1
Musil, D1
Rohdich, F1
Zanelli, U1
Downey-Kopyscinski, SL1
Mitsiades, CS1
Schadt, O1
Klein, M1
Esdar, C1
Reece, DE1
Masih-Khan, E1
Atenafu, EG1
Jimenez-Zepeda, VH1
McCurdy, A1
Song, K1
LeBlanc, R1
Sebag, M1
White, D1
Cherniawsky, H1
Reiman, A1
Stakiw, J1
Louzada, ML1
Kotb, R1
Aslam, M1
Gul, E1
Harousseau, JL1
Hari, P4
Shustik, C1
Romeril, K1
Minnema, MC1
de Wit, E1
Al-Salama, ZT1
Garnock-Jones, KP1
Scott, LJ1
Bonnet, A1
Hou, J1
Jin, J1
Xu, Y1
Wu, D1
Ke, X1
Zhou, D1
Lu, J1
Du, X1
Liu, J1
Li, H1
Hua, Z1
Wang, H1
Yang, H5
Zhang, S2
Liu, R1
Ma, H1
Su, Z1
Sun, F1
Zhao, N1
Pluta, A2
Nagler, A1
Ben-Yehuda, D1
San-Miguel, J1
Xu, W1
Sun, X1
Guo, H1
Lancman, G1
Tremblay, D1
Barley, K1
Barlogie, B1
Cho, HJ1
Jagannath, S1
Madduri, D1
Moshier, E1
Parekh, S1
Mikhael, JR2
Salvini, M2
Troia, R1
Giudice, D1
Pautasso, C1
Corvatta, L3
Gentili, S3
Ke, A1
Patel, C1
Liu, G4
Scalzulli, E1
Grammatico, S1
Vozella, F1
Striha, A1
Ashcroft, AJ1
Hockaday, A1
Cairns, DA1
Boardman, K1
Jacques, G1
Williams, C1
Snowden, JA1
Cavenagh, J1
Drayson, MT1
Owen, R1
Armoiry, X1
Connock, M1
Tsertsvadze, A1
Cummins, E1
Melendez-Torres, GJ1
Royle, P1
Clarke, A1
Lin, HM1
Nunes, AT1
Annunziata, CM1
Hofmeister, CC2
Rosenbaum, CA1
Htut, M1
Vesole, DH1
Berdeja, JG3
Liedtke, M1
Smith, SD1
Lebovic, D1
Raje, N4
Byrne, C4
Liao, E3
Bacco, AD1
Estevam, J2
Baz, R2
Barrio, S1
Stühmer, T2
Da-Viá, M1
Barrio-Garcia, C1
Lehners, N1
Besse, A1
Cuenca, I1
Garitano-Trojaola, A1
Fink, S1
Leich, E1
Chatterjee, M2
Driessen, C2
Rosenwald, A1
Beckmann, R1
Bargou, RC2
Braggio, E1
Stewart, AK4
Raab, MS1
Kortüm, KM1
Zanwar, S1
Abeykoon, JP1
O'Donnell, EK1
Voorhees, P1
Grzasko, N4
Delimpasi, S1
Jedrzejczak, WW2
Grosicki, S2
Kyrtsonis, MC1
Nahi, H1
Gruber, A1
Gay, F1
Min, CK3
Xie, J1
Wan, N1
Liang, Z1
Zhang, T1
Jiang, J1
Niesvizky, R3
Hamadani, M2
Vescio, R2
Kaufman, JL2
Szomor, Á1
Deák, B1
Szendrei, T1
Bátai, Á1
Pető, M1
Antunes, L1
Rocha-Gonçalves, F1
Chacim, S1
Lefèvre, C1
Pereira, M1
Pereira, S1
Zagorska, A1
Bento, MJ1
Hall, KH1
Smolewski, P1
Rydygier, D1
Echeveste Gutierrez, MA1
San-Miguel, JF1
Brünnert, D1
Kraus, M1
Kirner, S1
Heiden, R1
Goyal, P1
Cai, H1
Zhang, L2
Li, N1
Zheng, B1
Liu, M2
Araki, T1
Miura, A1
Fujitani, Y1
Takeoka, Y1
Deng, Q1
Hu, H1
Gong, Z1
Xu-Monette, ZY1
Lu, Z1
Young, KH1
Ma, X1
Li, Y1
Fujii, S1
Abe, M1
Garcia-Gomez, A1
Quwaider, D1
Canavese, M1
Ocio, EM1
Tian, Z3
Blanco, JF1
Berger, AJ2
Ortiz-de-Solorzano, C1
Hernández-Iglesias, T1
Martens, AC1
Groen, RW1
Mateo-Urdiales, J1
Fraile, S1
Galarraga, M1
Chauhan, D3
San Miguel, JF2
Garayoa, M1
Genadieva-Stavric, S1
Cavallo, F1
Bensinger, WI1
Zimmerman, TM1
Reeder, CB3
Hui, AM9
Yu, J2
Shou, Y1
Wang, M2
Jakubowiak, AJ1
Harvey, RD2
Talpaz, M1
Pratt, G1
Sorahan, T2
Anderson, KC3
Smith, EM2
Walker, BA2
Davenport, EL2
Aronson, LI1
Krige, D2
Hooftman, L2
Drummond, AH2
Davies, FE2
Gentile, M1
Vigna, E1
Recchia, AG1
Morabito, L1
Morabito, F1
LaPlant, B1
Laumann, K1
Thompson, MA2
Witzig, TE2
Rivera, CE2
Hwa, L1
Fonseca, R1
Chanan-Khan, A1
Goh, YT1
Lee, JH1
Kim, K1
Wong, RS1
Chim, CS1
Maracci, L1
Leoni, P1
Poh, A1
Muz, B1
Ghazarian, RN1
Ou, M1
Luderer, MJ1
Kusdono, HD1
Azab, AK1
Shirley, M1
Ratner, M1
Park, J1
Park, E1
Jung, CK1
Kang, SW1
Kim, BG1
Jung, Y1
Kim, TH1
Lim, JY1
Lee, SE1
Won, KA1
Chang, ET1
Delzell, E1
Sandhu, I1
Baker, BW1
Jackson, SR1
Stoppa, AM1
Simpson, DR1
Gimsing, P1
Garderet, L1
Berg, DT1
Burki, TK1
Badros, A1
Lipe, B1
Kukreti, V1
Qian, M1
Halvorson, AE1
Buadi, F1
Crawley, J1
Mikhael, J1
Stewart, K1
Lin, Y1
Schlafer, D1
Shah, KS1
Panjic, EH1
Jouni, H1
Aubry, MC1
Vincent Rajkumar, S1
Frye, RL1
Herrmann, J1
Desai, A1
Zeng, D1
Gong, T1
Lu, P1
Handa, H1
Ishizawa, K1
Takubo, T1
Kase, Y1
Burstyn, I1
De Roos, AJ2
Yui, JC1
Tumber, A1
Nuzzi, A1
Hookway, ES1
Hatch, SB1
Velupillai, S1
Johansson, C1
Kawamura, A1
Savitsky, P1
Yapp, C1
Szykowska, A1
Wu, N1
Bountra, C1
Strain-Damerell, C1
Burgess-Brown, NA1
Ruda, GF1
Fedorov, O1
Munro, S1
England, KS1
Nowak, RP1
Schofield, CJ1
La Thangue, NB1
Pawlyn, C1
Athanasou, N1
Müller, S1
Oppermann, U1
Brennan, PE1
Koulaouzidis, G1
Lyon, AR1
Moore, HE1
Muralikrishnan, S1
Dunlop, AS1
Zhou, B1
Kuhn, D1
Orlowski, R1
Richardson, P2
Appel, A1
Zhao, JJ1
Tai, YT1
Amin, SB1
Hu, Y1
DRIVSHOLM, A2
MILNE, MD1
Blair, A1
Rusiecki, JA1
Hoppin, JA1
Svec, M1
Dosemeci, M1
Sandler, DP1
Alavanja, MC1
Farmer, DR1
Lash, TL1
Acquavella, JF1
Meijer, JJ1
van Dijken, JP1
Matsuura, K1
Sinohara, H1
Hansson, UB1
Wu, TT1
Kabat, EA1

Clinical Trials (25)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase I/II Study of Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone and Ixazomib vs. Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone for Patients With Multiple Myeloma Relapsing on Lenalidomide as Part of First Line Therapy[NCT02004275]Phase 1/Phase 2118 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-02-28Active, not recruiting
A Phase 2, Open-Label, Multicenter Study of Ixazomib Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Japanese Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT02917941]Phase 234 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-01Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Open-Label Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib/Dexamethasone and Oral Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT03170882]Phase 2122 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-08-01Completed
Phase 1/2 Trial of Ixazomib in Combination With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Previously Untreated Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma or Light Chain Amyloidosis[NCT01864018]Phase 1/Phase 287 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-08-20Active, not recruiting
Ixazomib in Combination With Thalidomide - Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT02410694]Phase 290 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-30Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Citrate (MLN9708) Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Multiple Myeloma Following Autologous Stem Cell Transplant[NCT02181413]Phase 3656 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-07-01Active, not recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01564537]Phase 3722 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-01Completed
A Randomized, National, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial Studying Induction Therapy With Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone (VRD-GEM), Followed by High-dose Chemotherapy With Melphalan-200 (MEL-200) Versus Busulfan-melphalan (BUMEL), and Consol[NCT01916252]Phase 3460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2, Pilot Study, Evaluating Early Treatment With Bispecific T-cell Redirectors (Teclistamab and Talquetamab) in the Frontline Therapy of Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma[NCT05849610]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-Blind Study of Oral Ixazomib Maintenance Therapy After Initial Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Treated With Stem Cell Transplantation[NCT02312258]Phase 3706 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-04-09Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT01850524]Phase 3705 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-29Completed
Dynamic Frailty Assessment for Guiding the Treatment in Older Adults With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma :a Prospective and Single-center Study[NCT06099912]120 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-12-30Not yet recruiting
A Phase I Open Label First in Human Dose Escalation of the Immunoproteasome Inhibitor M3258 as a Single Agent and Expansion Study of M3258 in Combination With Dexamethasone in Participants With Relapsed Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT04075721]Phase 110 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-09-26Terminated (stopped due to The study was early discontinued due to lack of participant enrollment.)
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study Evaluating the Safety and Tolerability of Weekly Dosing of the Oral Form of MLN9708, a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT00963820]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1/2 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, Administered in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Re[NCT01217957]Phase 1/Phase 265 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-22Completed
An Open-Label, Dose-Escalation, Phase 1 Study of the Oral Form of Ixazomib (MLN9708), a Second-Generation Proteasome Inhibitor, in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT00932698]Phase 160 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-12Completed
A Phase III Study to Determine the Role of Ixazomib as an Augmented Conditioning Therapy in Salvage Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) and as a Post-ASCT Consolidation and Maintenance Strategy in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT03562169]Phase 3406 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2017-03-20Recruiting
An Open-Label, Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Oral Combination of Ixazomib (MLN9708) With Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone in Patients With Newly Diagnosed or Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Requiring Systemic Treatment[NCT02046070]Phase 2148 participants (Actual)Interventional2014-03-05Completed
A Multicenter, Open-label, Prospective Study of Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Ixazomib in Combination With Lenalidomide for Maintenance Therapy in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT04217967]Phase 4180 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-01-03Recruiting
A Phase II Study of Lenalidomide, Ixazomib, Dexamethasone, and Daratumumab in Transplant-Ineligible Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma[NCT04009109]Phase 2188 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-10-21Recruiting
A Phase 1 Pharmacokinetic and Tolerability Study of Oral MLN9708 Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Asian Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01645930]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-12-17Completed
A Phase I/II Study of Carfilzomib, Iberdomide (CC-220) and Dexamethasone (KID) in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Transplant Eligible Multiple Myeloma[NCT05199311]Phase 1/Phase 266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-05-13Recruiting
GEM21menos65. A Phase III Trial for NDMM Patients Who Are Candidates for ASCT Comparing Extended VRD Plus Early Rescue Intervention vs Isatuximab-VRD vs Isatuximab-V-Iberdomide-D[NCT05558319]Phase 3480 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-10-31Not yet recruiting
Phase 2 Trial of Ixazomib Combinations in Patients With Relapsed Multiple Myeloma[NCT01415882]Phase 2108 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-01-31Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Open Label Phase 2 Single Arm Study of Ixazomib, Pomalidomide and Dexamethasone in Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma Characterized With Genomic Abnormalities of Adverse Adverse Prognostic[NCT03683277]Phase 226 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-11-03Terminated (stopped due to Recruitment issue, 26 patients enrolled instead of 70 initially planned)
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)

Disease response status is based on the IMWG criteria being held for two consecutive evaluations at least 4 weeks apart. Clinical benefit rate (CBR) is defined as proportion of patients with minimal response (MR) and better according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II) (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).564
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).737

Disease Control Rate (DCR), Defined as Stable Disease (SD) and Better According to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (Phase II)

Proportion of patients that went two of more cycles of treatment without discontinuing treatment for progression or intolerability. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 42 days

Interventionproportion of partcipants (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).949
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).921

Duration of Response (DOR), Calculated for All Patients Achieving an Objective Response, Partial Response (PR) or Better (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

InterventionMonths (Median)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)12.3
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)23.7

Incidence and Type of Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)

These events are reported in the adverse events section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 44.5 months

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Phase 1 Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level 20
Phase 1 Dose Level 31
Phase 1 Dose Level 41

Incidence of Dose Reductions/Delays (Phase I)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 39 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase 1 Dose Level 12
Phase 1 Dose Level 23
Phase 1 Dose Level 36
Phase 1 Dose Level 45

Incidence, Type and Severity of Adverse Events, Graded According to National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase II)

The count of paitents that experenced an adverse event is reported in this section. A full table of these events is reported in the adverse event section of this report. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 92 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)22
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib) + Crossover Patients From Arm I33
Phase 1 Dose Level 12
Phase 1 Dose Level 22
Phase 1 Dose Level 34
Phase 1 Dose Level 46

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Pomalidomide and Ixazomib, Determined According to Incidence of Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Graded Using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0 (Phase I)

For this protocol, dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) will be defined by the following adverse events at least possibly related to study therapy: Grade 3 or higher non-hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Alopecia is not expected but would not be considered a DLT. Nausea, vomiting and diarrhea will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be adequately managed with optimal supportive care. Grade 3 or 4 hyperglycemia due to dexamethasone will only be considered a DLT if it cannot be controlled with appropriate therapy Grade 4 hematologic toxicity, with the following exceptions: Grade 4 lymphopenia is expected with this regimen and will not be construed as a DLT. Grade 4 neutropenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days despite appropriate supportive care. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia will only be considered a DLT if it lasts longer than 7 days or is associated with greater then or equal to grade 3 bleeding event (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 28 days

Interventionparticipants with DLT (Number)
Phase 1 Dose Level 10
Phase 1 Dose Level 20
Phase 1 Dose Level 31
Phase 1 Dose Level 41

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), complete response (CR), or stringent complete response (sCR) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Uniform Response Criteria (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventionproportion of participants (Number)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).436
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).632

Overall Survival (OS) (Phase II)

Overall survival was analyzed from the time of registration to the date of death or last known date living. Due to median OS time not being reached due to lack of deaths at the time of this report by either arm, the 2 year OS rate has been reported. This analysis censors living patients at 2 years. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 2 years

Interventionproportion of patients alive (Number)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).795
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib).784

Progression Free Survival (PFS) (Phase II)

progression-free survival (PFS), defined as the time from randomization to the date the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria for disease progression is met. If a patient initiates another anti-cancer treatment prior to disease progression, they will be censored at the date of initiation of this treatment. Patients will be randomized to treatment using the Pocock-Simon algorithm balancing the distribution of the following stratification factors between the two treatment arms: 1) ISS 1-2 disease vs. ISS 3 disease (current ISS stage based off screening beta 2 microglobulin and albumin) 2) High risk cytogenetics features: yes vs. no High risk cytogenetics features include: del(1p), gain of 1q, t(4;14), t(14;16), t(14; 20), del(17p) 3) Prior treatment with a proteasome inhibitor: yes vs. no (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: 3 years

Interventiondays (Median)
Phase II Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)228
Phase II Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)619

Progression Free Survival (PFS) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years post-registration (at crossover)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)5.6

Baseline Level of Perceived Fatigue and QOL, Assessed Using the Registration Fatigue/Uniscale Assessment Form (Phase II)

Pre-treatment patient-report of fatigue and overall quality of life (based on a 10-point Likert scale). A higher number indicates a better quality of life where 10 is the best outcome and 0 is the worst. (NCT02004275)
Timeframe: baseline

,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
High QoL(7-10)Medium or Low QoL (0-7)
Arm I (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone)2116
Arm II (Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone, Ixazomib)2711

Response Rates (Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), Disease Control Rate (DCR) for All Patients on the Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone Arm at the Time of Cross-over to Pomalidomide/Dexamethasone/Ixazomib (Phase II)

(NCT02004275)
Timeframe: Up to 3 years

Interventionproportion of partcipants (Number)
Overall Response RateClinical Benefit RateDisease Control Rate
Arm I(Pomalidomide, Dexamethasone).231.269.962

Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg34

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR:percentage of participants with CR including stringent complete response(sCR),VGPR,partial response(PR) per independent review committee(IRC)by IMWG criteria.CR: serum,urine -ve immunofixation; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas,<5%plasma cells in bone marrow(CR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels=normal FLC ratio 0.26 to 1.65+CR criteria).sCR:CR+normal FLC ratio,absence of clonal plasma cells(immunohistochemistry)or 2-to 4-color flow cytometry.VGPR:serum,urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation,not by electrophoresis or ≥90%reduction,<100mg/24hrs(VGPR in those with only measurable disease by serum FLC levels,requires>90%decrease in involved-uninvolved FLC level difference).PR: ≥50%reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hr urinary M protein by≥90%/ to<200mg/24-hr or ≥50%decrease in difference between involved-uninvolved FLC levels/≥50%reduction in bone marrow plasma cells,if≥30%at baseline/≥50%soft tissue plasmacytoma size reduction. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg84.4

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of first study drug administration to the date of death. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA

Percentage of Participants With Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) or Better Response (Complete Response (CR) + VGPR)

Response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR was defined as negative immunofixation in serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR was defined as serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg50.0

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time in months from the date of first study drug administration to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg22.05

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD as assessed using IMWG criteria. PD required one of the following: increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dL); urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dL); development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg22.57

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as time in months from date of first documentation of response, VGPR or better, and ORR (CR+PR (including sCR and VGPR) or better, to date of first documented PD among participants who responded to treatment. Response was assessed by investigator using IMWG Criteria. CR:negative immunofixation in serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and;<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR:CR plus normal FLC ratio, absence of clonal plasma cells by immunohistochemistry or 2- to 4-color flow cytometry. VGPR:serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg/24 hours. PR:≥50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by ≥90%/ to <200 mg/24-hour or ≥50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/≥50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if ≥30% at baseline/≥50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
VGPR or betterORR
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA21.65

Number of Participants With NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs Related Laboratory Parameters

Laboratory parameters included chemistry and hematology. An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. An AE was graded as per NCI CTCAE. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Platelet count decreasedNeutrophil count decreasedWhite blood cell count decreasedLymphocyte count decreasedAlanine aminotransferase increasedAspartate aminotransferase increasedLipase increasedBlood creatine phosphokinase increased
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg76311111

Number of Participants With NCI CTCAE Grade 3 or Higher TEAEs Related to Vital Signs

Vital signs included temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. An AE is any unfavorable or unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it was related to the medicinal product. A TEAE is defined as any AE that occurred after administration of the first dose of any study drug through 30 days after the last dose of any study drug. An AE was graded as per NCI CTCAE. (NCT02917941)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 33 months

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypertensionHypotension
Ixazomib 4 mg + Lenalidomide 25 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg11

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR: Time from first documentation of CR/PR/VGPR to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PR:>=50% reduction of serum M protein+reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% to <200 mg/24-hour or >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels/ >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if >=30% at Baseline/ >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR: serum+urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/ >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR:negative immunofixation on serum + urine+disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas+<5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PD:serum M-component increase >=0.5 g/dl or urine M-component increase >=200 mg/24-hour/ difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase >10 mg/dl or bone marrow plasma cell >=10%/development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma or development of hypercalcemia. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg14.3
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg14.8

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause, up to 3 years are reported. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mgNA
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg18.8

Percentage of Participants With Overall Response

Overall Response Rate (ORR) was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved partial response (PR), very good partial response (VGPR), or complete response (CR) based on laboratory results and IRC assessment using modified IMWG criteria. PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when baseline value >=30% and; if present at baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5 % plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg41
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg38

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS: Time from randomization to first occurrence of confirmed progressive disease (PD) as assessed by investigator by International Myeloma Working Group(IMWG) response criteria/death from any cause, whichever occurs first. PD requires following: Increase of >=25 % from nadir in: Serum M component (increase must be >=0.5 gram per deciliter [g/dl]); Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 milligram [mg]/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new/increase in size of existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas; development of hypercalcemia (>11.5mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg4.8
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg7.1

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was defined as the time from the date of randomization to first documentation of PD. Per IMWG criteria, PD required 1 of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (increase must be >=0.5 g/dl; Urine M-component (increase must be >=200 mg/24-hour); In participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels increase of >10 mg/dl; In participants without measurable serum and urine M protein levels and without measurable disease by FLC level: Bone marrow plasma cell percentage must be >=10%; Development of new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (>11.5 mg/dL corrected serum calcium) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first occurrence of confirmed disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg5.1
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg8.4

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from randomization to the first documentation of PR/VGPR/CR. Per IMWG criteria, PR: >=50% reduction of serum M protein + reduction in 24-hour urinary M protein by >=90% or to <200 mg/24-hour; if M-protein is not measurable, >=50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels is required; if not measurable by FLC, >=50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, when Baseline value >=30% and; if present at Baseline, >=50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is required. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or >=90% reduction in serum M-protein + urine M-protein level <100 mg/24-hour. CR: negative immunofixation on serum + urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas; <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until first documentation of CR, VGPR or PR (Up to approximately 3 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg1.1
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg2.0

Health Care Utilization (HU): Number of Participants With at Least One Medical Encounter

Healthcare resources used during medical encounters included hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HospitalizationsEmergency Room StaysOutpatient Visits
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg231132
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg16929

Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Physical Domain Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a global health status/quality of life (QOL) scale. The physical domain consisted of 5 items covering participant's daily physical activities on a scale from 1 (not at all) to 4 (very much). Raw scores were linearly transformed to a total score between 0-100, with a high score indicating better physical functioning. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg67.956.5
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg67.052.4

HRQOL Based on EORTC Multiple Myeloma Module 20 (EORTC QLQ-MY20) Score

The EORTC QLQ-MY20 has 20 items across 4 independent subscales, 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms, side effects of treatment), and 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale. Higher scores for the future perspective scale indicate better perspective of the future, for the body image scale indicate better body image and for the disease symptoms scale indicate higher level of symptomatology. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: End of TreatmentSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: End of TreatmentBody Image: BaselineBody Image: End of TreatmentFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: End of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg72.468.981.477.882.983.767.564.0
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg73.273.581.074.481.575.058.857.9

HRQOL Based on EORTC QLQ-C30 SubScale Score

The EORTC QLQ-C30 contains 30 items across 5 functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), 9 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, sleep disturbance, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties) and a QOL scale. Most of the 30 items had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much), with 2 questions relying on a 7-point numeric rating scale. Each subscale raw score were linearly transformed to a total score between 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status/QOL scale, higher scores represent better QOL; for the symptom scales, lower scores represent better QOL. The Physical domain of the functional subscale is reported in the secondary outcome measure 7. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL: BaselineGlobal Health Status/QoL: End of TreatmentRole (Functional Scale): BaselineRole (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentEmotional (Functional Scale): BaselineEmotional (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentCognitive(Functional Scale): BaselineCognitive (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentSocial (Functional Scale): BaselineSocial (Functional Scale): End of TreatmentFatigue (Symptom Scale): BaselineFatigue (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentNausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): BaselineNausea/Vomiting (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentPain (Symptom Scale): BaselinePain (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentDyspnea (Symptom Scale): BaselineDyspnea (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentInsomnia (Symptom Scale): BaselineInsomnia (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentAppetite Loss (Symptom Scale): BaselineAppetite Loss (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentConstipation (Symptom Scale): BaselineConstipation (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentDiarrhea (Symptom Scale): BaselineDiarrhea (Symptom Scale): End of TreatmentFinancial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): BaselineFinancial Difficulties (Symptom Scale): End of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg60.848.267.949.283.172.884.077.475.769.861.050.394.892.965.253.219.024.629.529.414.323.011.419.816.716.317.112.7
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg57.047.867.447.674.967.679.669.672.263.160.050.896.788.761.151.225.240.532.636.922.234.513.325.017.819.022.216.7

HRQOL Based on EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS) Score

The EQ VAS records the respondent's self-rated health on a 20 centimeter (cm), vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state). The scores from all dimensions were combined into a single index score that was reported, where higher score was better quality of life. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
BaselineEnd of Treatment
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg64.455.9
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg59.246.9

HU: Duration of Medical Encounters

Duration of healthcare resources used during medical encounters including hospitalizations, emergency room stays, or outpatient visits was reported in days. A hospitalization was defined as at least 1 overnight stay in an Intensive Care Unit and/or non-Intensive Care Unit (acute care unit, palliative care unit, and hospice). (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 3 years

,
Interventiondays (Median)
HospitalizationsEmergency Room StaysOutpatient Visits
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg1.01.03.0
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg2.01.04.0

Number of Participants With Responses to HRQOL Based on 5-level Classification System of the EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Score

EQ-5D-5L comprises of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression), each rated on 5 levels: 1= no problems, 2= slight problems, 3= moderate problems, 4= severe problems, 5= extremely severe problems. Higher scores indicated greater levels of problems across the five dimensions. (NCT03170882)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (Up to 28 cycles, each cycle was of 28 days)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Mobility: 1 = I Have no Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 2 = I Have Slight Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 4 = I Have Severe Problems in Walking AboutMobility: 5 = I am Unable to Walk AboutSelf-Care: 1 = I Have no Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Washing or Dressing MyselfSelf-Care: 5 = I am Unable to Wash or Dress MyselfUsual Activities: 1 = I Have no Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 2 = I Have Slight Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 3 = I Have Moderate Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 4 = I Have Severe Problems Doing my Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: 5 = I am Unable to do my Usual ActivitiesPain/Discomfort: 1 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 2 = I Have Slight Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 3 = I Have Moderate Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 4 = I Have Severe Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: 5 = I Have Extreme Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 1 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 2 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 3 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 4 = I Have no Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: 5 = I Have no Pain or Discomfort
Ixazomib 4 mg + Dexamethasone 20 mg91211812110442109127381015621913612
Pomalidomide 4 mg + Dexamethasone 40 mg5688013653047871351360681120

Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide (Phase I)

Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days

Interventionmg/m² weekly (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)400

Number of Patients Experiencing a Grade 3 or Greater Adverse Event at Least Possibly Related to Treatment as Assessed by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0

The maximum grade for each type of adverse event will be recorded for each patient, and frequency tables will be reviewed to determine patterns. Additionally, the relationship of the adverse event(s) to the study treatment will be taken into consideration. Adverse events will be graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A grade 3 event is one that is severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self care ADL. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 5 years

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Phase I/II, Cohort A36
Phase II, Cohort B16

Percentage of Patients With Complete Response or Very Good Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort A)

The percentage of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)35

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

The distribution of PFS will be estimated using the method of Kaplan Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to the earliest date of documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I/II, Cohort ANA
Phase II, Cohort BNA

Rate of Complete Response, Very Good Partial Response, or Partial Response (Phase II, Cohort B)

The proportion of successes will be estimated by the number of successes divided by the total number of evaluable patients. Exact binomial 95% confidence intervals for the true success proportion will be calculated. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Up to 48 weeks

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)63

Survival Time

The distribution of survival time will be estimated using the method of Kaplan-Meier. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: Time from registration to death due to any cause, assessed up to 5 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase I/II, Cohort ANA
Phase II, Cohort BNA

Maximum Tolerated (MTD) Dose of Cyclophosphamide With Ixazomib and Dexamethasone (Phase I)

Will be defined as the dose level below the lowest dose that induces dose-limiting toxicity in at least 1/3 of patients, as assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. (NCT01864018)
Timeframe: At 28 days

Interventionmg weekly (Number)
MTD of ixazomibMTD of dexamethasone
Treatment (Ixazomib Citrate, Cyclophosphamide, Dexamethasone)440

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD), as evaluated by an independent review committee according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occured first. PD was defined as ≥25% increase from lowest value in: serum/urine M component; participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels, the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels must be >10 mg/dL; participants without measurable serum, urine M-protein levels and FLC levels, bone marrow plasma cell percent must have been ≥10%; new bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas development/existing bone lesions/soft tissue plasmacytomas size increase; hypercalcemia development. (NCT02181413)
Timeframe: Randomization up to End of treatment (EOT) (24 months); thereafter followed up every 4 weeks until progression of disease or death (to data cutoff: approximately 4 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo21.3
Ixazomib Citrate26.5

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR [including sCR] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone26.0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone21.7

OS in High-Risk Participants

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone46.9
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.9

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone78.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone71.5

Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism

Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone80.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75.7

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone53.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone51.6

Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17). (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone42.2
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.4

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC

Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone48.1
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone39.0

PFS in High-Risk Participants

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone18.7
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone9.3

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.7

Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.4
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone17.6

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTPain: BaselinePain: EOTNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone58.4-6.070.0-4.768.4-8.675.1-2.181.9-7.677.9-6.938.46.038.02.75.03.421.25.727.40.916.94.712.2-1.36.317.216.70.5

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentGlobal Health Index: Last Follow-upPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Last Follow-upRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Last Follow-upEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Last Follow-upCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Last Follow-upSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Last Follow-upFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTFatigue: Last Follow-upPain: BaselinePain: EOTPain: Last Follow-upNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTNausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-upDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Last Follow-upInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTInsomnia: Last Follow-upAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Last Follow-upConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTConstipation: Last Follow-upDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Last Follow-upFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone56.4-6.016.767.3-6.20.064.4-8.6-16.775.3-6.1-25.081.6-5.8-50.075.3-7.90.039.56.722.238.53.80.06.00.633.323.72.30.030.5-0.533.315.36.50.013.52.233.38.110.80.018.61.3-33.3

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-upBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTBody Image: Last Follow-upFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOTFuture Perspective: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.41-2.5817.974.4337.0479.48-5.38-33.360.26-2.75-11.11

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTDisease Symptoms: Last Follow-upSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.71-2.351.1117.234.5278.00-0.2756.992.76

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone359205
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone357201

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response

"Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now [current pain]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst)." (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineEOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone345145
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone351153

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0000000000000

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone4.7936.315.66.832.47.122.482.412.422.572.712.372.512.82

Duration of Next-line Therapy

Duration of next-line therapy is defined as the time from the date of the first dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy coming after study treatment to the date of the last dose. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo14.0
Ixazomib8.7

OS in a High-risk Population

High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying cytogenetic deletion (del)17, translocation [t](4;14), t(14;16). OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo48.3
Ixazomib37.3

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization and every 12 weeks after PD on next-line therapy until death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo69.5
Ixazomib64.8

Percentage of Participants Who Develop a New Primary Malignancy

(NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo6.2
Ixazomib5.2

Percentage of Participants With Conversion From Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) Positive to MRD Negative

Bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were sent to a central laboratory and were assessed for MRD using flow cytometry. MRD negativity was defined as absence of MRD and MRD positivity was defined as presence of MRD. MRD was assessed by 8-color flow cytometry with the IMWG recommended sensitivity of 10^-5. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo3
Ixazomib6

PFS in a High-risk Population

High-risk population included but not be limited to participants carrying del17, t(4;14), t(14;16). PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.6
Ixazomib10.1

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Per IMWG criteria, PD is defined as, increase of 25% of lowest response value in one or more of following criteria: serum M-component (absolute increase ≥0.5 g/ deciliter (dL)); or urine M-component (absolute increase ≥200 mg/24-hour); difference between involved and uninvolved free light chains (FLC) levels (absolute increase >10 mg/dL); or bone marrow plasma cell percentage (absolute plasma cell percentage ≥10%); development of new/ increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytoma; or development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium >11.5mg/dL). (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.4
Ixazomib17.4

Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2)

PFS2 is defined as the time from the date of randomization to objective PD on next-line treatment using IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to every 12 weeks until second PD or death (up to 88 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo50.3
Ixazomib51.3

Time to End of the Next-line of Therapy After Study Treatment

Time to end of the next line of therapy is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of last dose of the next line of antineoplastic therapy following study treatment. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo25.6
Ixazomib23.1

Time to Improvement of PN Events

PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies NEC according to the MedDRA. A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the improvement date or the day before and after. Time to improvement was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the improvement of event. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo81.0
Ixazomib64.0

Time to Next Line Therapy (TTNT)

TTNT is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first dose of next-line antineoplastic therapy. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo16.1
Ixazomib22.1

Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD, using IMWG criteria. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization until PD or death (up to 52 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo9.6
Ixazomib17.8

Time to Resolution of Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) Events

PN is defined as the event in the high-level term of peripheral neuropathies not elsewhere classified (NEC) according to the medical dictionary for regulatory activities (MedDRA). A PN event was considered as resolved if its final outcome was resolved with no subsequent PN event of the same preferred term occurring on the resolution date or the day before and after. Time to resolution was defined as the time from the initial onset date (inclusive) to the resolution date for resolved events. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 52 months

Interventiondays (Median)
Placebo196.0
Ixazomib451.0

Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 11 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 14 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 17 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 20 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 23 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 26 Day 1
Placebo-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.1-0.00.0-0.0-0.0-0.00.00.00.00.00.10.00.10.00.0

Change From Baseline in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

ECOG performance status assesses a participant's performance status on a 6-point scale ranging from 0=fully active/able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1=restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory/able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2=ambulatory (>50% of waking hours), capable of all self-care, unable to carry out any work activities; 3=capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair >50% of waking hours; 4=completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5=dead. Lower grades indicate improvement. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 1 of Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26, progression free survival follow-up (PFSFU)- Visit 37 and progressive disease follow-up (PDFU)- Visit 26 (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1Cycle 7 Day 1Cycle 8 Day 1Cycle 9 Day 1Cycle 10 Day 1Cycle 11 Day 1Cycle 12 Day 1Cycle 13 Day 1Cycle 14 Day 1Cycle 15 Day 1Cycle 16 Day 1Cycle 17 Day 1Cycle 18 Day 1Cycle 19 Day 1Cycle 20 Day 1Cycle 21 Day 1Cycle 22 Day 1Cycle 23 Day 1Cycle 24 Day 1Cycle 25 Day 1Cycle 26 Day 1PFSFU- Visit 37PDFU- Visit 26
Ixazomib-0.0-0.0-0.1-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.0-0.01.01.0

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) as Measured by the Global Health Status (GHS)

"The EORTC QLQ-C30 is a questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life of cancer patients. The change from baseline in GHS (EORTC QLQ-C30) score is presented. Participant responses to the question How would you rate your overall health during the past week? are scored on a 7-point scale (1=very poor to 7=excellent). Using linear transformation, raw scores are standardized, so that scores range from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates a better overall GHS." (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycles 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, and 26 (cycle length=28 days)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 2Cycle 3Cycle 4Cycle 5Cycle 6Cycle 7Cycle 8Cycle 9Cycle 10Cycle 11Cycle 12Cycle 13Cycle 14Cycle 15Cycle 16Cycle 17Cycle 18Cycle 19Cycle 20Cycle 21Cycle 22Cycle 23Cycle 24Cycle 25Cycle 26
Ixazomib-0.1-1.2-0.60.6-1.5-0.7-0.40.1-1.60.20.3-0.5-1.1-0.70.5-0.21.71.10.41.31.00.92.30.30.9
Placebo1.72.11.51.81.03.10.91.42.03.93.94.23.12.22.52.40.51.61.11.51.62.1-0.30.02.8

Correlation Between Frailty Status and PFS and OS

Participant's frailty status is classified as fit, unfit or frail on the bases of 4 components: age, the Charlson comorbidity scoring system without age weighting, the Katz index of independence in activities of daily living, and the Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. The sum of the 4 frailty scores equals the total frailty score. A total frailty score of 0 corresponds to a frailty status of fit; a total score of 1, to unfit; and a total score of 2 or more, to frail. PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS will be measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
PFS Based on Frailty Status of FitPFS Based on Frailty Status of UnfitPFS Based on Frailty Status of FrailOS Based on Frailty Status of FitOS Based on Frailty Status of UnfitOS Based on Frailty Status of Frail
Ixazomib18.617.615.4NANA46.5
Placebo8.510.611.1NANA42.5

Correlation of MRD Status With PFS and OS

PFS is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of PD or death from any cause, as evaluated by an IRC according to IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurred first, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. OS was measured as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, assessed for up to 52 months in this outcome measure. Participants with various types of known MRD status were pooled together for analysis of overall survival in this outcome measure. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: From randomization up to 52 months

,
Interventionmonths (Median)
PFS for Participants with Known MRD+ at Study EntryPFS for Participants with Known MRD- at Study EntryOS for Participants with Known MRD Status (MRD- Status, MRD+ Status) at Study Entry
Ixazomib16.940.5NA
Placebo9.3NANA

Percentage of Participants Who Achieve or Maintain Any Best Response Category During the Treatment Period

Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria based on IRC assessment. Best response included PR, VGPR and CR. PR= >=50% reduction of serum M protein and >=90% or <200 mg reduction urinary M protein in 24-hour, or >50% decrease in difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, or >50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells, if bone marrow plasma cells >30% and >50% reduction in size of soft tissue plasmacytomas at baseline. VGPR= >90% reduction (<100 mg/24-hour) in serum M-protein + urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis. Complete response= >5% plasma cells in myelogram with absence of paraprotein in serum and urine according to immunofixation. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Up to 27 months

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PRVGPRCR
Ixazomib253431
Placebo293728

Percentage of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An adverse event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of ixazomib or placebo through 30 days after the last dose of ixazomib or placebo. A SAE means any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in death, was life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, was a congenital anomaly/birth defect or was considered medically significant. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of study drug (up to 88 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
SAETEAE
Ixazomib2492
Placebo1782

Pharmacokinetic Parameter: Plasma Concentration of Ixazomib

Plasma concentrations of the complete hydrolysis product of ixazomib citrate (ixazomib) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS) assay. (NCT02312258)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (1 and 4 hours post-dose Day 1, Days 8 and 15 pre-dose); Cycle 2 and 5 (Days 1 and 8 pre-dose) and Cycles 3, 4, 6 to 10 (Day 1 pre-dose) (cycle length=28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 - 1 Hour Post-doseCycle 1 Day 1 - 4 Hours Post-doseCycle 1 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 15 - Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 8 - Pre-doseCycle 6 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 8 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 9 Day 1 - Pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1 - Pre-dose
Ixazomib19.35312.6981.6832.8281.9583.2172.2522.3632.3284.5472.5032.5852.6062.5662.686

Complete Response (CR) Rate

CR rate was defined as the percentage of participants who achieve CR assessed by an IRC relative to the intent-to-treat (ITT) population during the treatment period. Percentage of participants with CR, as assessed by IMWG disease assessment criteria were reported. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % plasma cells (PC's) in bone marrow. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex14
Ixazomib + LenDex26

Duration of Response

Duration of response was measured as the time from the date of first documentation of PR or better to the date of first documented progression (PD) for responders, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex37.5
Ixazomib + LenDex50.6

OS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. High risk category includes t(4;14), t(14;16), or del(17) abnormalities. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex43.1
Ixazomib + LenDex39.0

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who achieved CR + partial response (PR) + very good partial response (VGPR) (including sCR) or better relative to the ITT population during treatment period. CR was defined as negative immunofixation of serum and urine along with the disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5 % PC's in bone marrow. PR was defined as ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% along with ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. VGPR was defined as ≥90% in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24. sCR is defined as stringent complete response. Percentages are rounded off to nearest whole numbers. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex80
Ixazomib + LenDex82

Overall Survival (OS)

OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documented death at the time of analysis are censored at the date last known to be alive. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to death due to any cause (Up to approximately 9 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDexNA
Ixazomib + LenDexNA

Pain Response Rate as Assessed by the Brief Pain Inventory- Short Form (BPI-SF) and Analgesic Use

Pain response rate was defined as percentage of participants with pain response. Pain response was defined as the occurrence of at least a 30% reduction from baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic use for 2 consecutive measurements > 28 days apart, were reported. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). Percentages are rounded off to the nearest single decimal. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex51.3
Ixazomib + LenDex50.5

Percentage of Participants With MRD-Negative Status as Assessed by Flow Cytometry

The absence of minimal residual disease (MRD negativity) was tested in all participants who achieve a CR and maintained it until Cycle 18, using bone marrow aspirates. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to Cycle 18 (cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex50
Ixazomib + LenDex59

Percentage of Participants With New or Worsening of Existing Skeletal-related Events (SREs)

SRE is defined as new fractures [including vertebral compression fractures], irradiation of or surgery on bone, or spinal cord compression. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

Interventionpercentage of partcipants (Number)
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)14
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)10
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)28
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)25

PFS in High-risk Population Carrying Del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) Mutations

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease based on central laboratory results and IMWG criteria as evaluated by an independent review committee (IRC) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first, as assessed in high-risk population carrying del(17p), t(4;14), or t(14;16) mutations. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex17.5
Ixazomib + LenDex22.4

Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death due to any cause according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria whichever occurs first. PD required one of the following: Increase of >=25% from nadir in: Serum M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=0.5 g/dL); Urine M-component and/or (the absolute increase must be >=200 mg/24 hours); in participants without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels: the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase must be > 10 mg/dL); Bone marrow plasma cell percentage: the absolute % must be >10%; development of new bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas or definite increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dL or 2.85 mmol/L). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 79 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex21.8
Ixazomib + LenDex35.3

Progression Free Survival (PFS)-2

PFS2 was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of documentation of disease progression on the subsequent line of anticancer therapy, as assessed by the investigator in accordance with IMWG criteria, or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex52.2
Ixazomib + LenDex63.2

Time to Pain Progression

Time to pain progression was assessed as the time from randomization to the date of initial progression classification. Pain progression was defined as the occurrence of 1 of the following and confirmed by 2 consecutive evaluations (To qualify as progression, the participant must have a BPI-SF worst pain score > 4 during pain progression): 1) a ≥ 2 point and 30% increase from Baseline in BPI-SF worst pain score without an increase in analgesic use, or 2) a 25% or more increase in analgesic use from Baseline without a decrease in BPI-SF worst pain score from Baseline. Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form (m-BPI-SF) is a participant rated 11-point Likert rating scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain imaginable). (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex47.1
Ixazomib + LenDexNA

Time to Progression (TTP)

Time to progression was defined as the time from randomization to the date of first documented disease progression. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex26.8
Ixazomib + LenDex45.8

Time to Response

Time to response was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PR or better, as measured by IMWG criteria. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

Interventionmonths (Median)
Placebo + LenDex1.87
Ixazomib + LenDex1.02

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Measured by European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ)-C30 Scale Total Score

EORTC-QLQ-C30 scale was used to assess HRQOL in cancer participants and contains 30 items. Subscale with individual items include physical functioning items 1-5, role functioning items 6-7, emotional functioning items 21-24, cognitive functioning items 20, 25, social functioning items 26-27, quality of life items 29-30, fatigue items 10, 12, 18, nausea and vomiting items 14-15, pain items 9, 19, dyspnoea item 8, insomnia item 11, appetite loss item 13, constipation item 16, diarrhoea item 17, financial difficulties item 28. Raw scores were converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For the functional scales and the global health status scale, higher scores represent better HRQOL; whereas for the symptom scales lower scores represent better HRQOL. Positive change in functional and global health status scale indicated improvement; negative change for the symptom scales indicates improvement. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 9 years

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL: BaselineGlobal Health Status/QoL: End of TreatmentPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: End of TreatmentRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: End of TreatmentEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: End of TreatmentCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: End of TreatmentSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: End of TreatmentFatigue: BaselineFatigue: End of TreatmentPain: BaselinePain: End of TreatmentNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: End of TreatmentDyspnoea: BaselineDyspnoea: End of TreatmentInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: End of TreatmentAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: End of TreatmentConstipation: BaselineConstipation: End of TreatmentDiarrhoea: BaselineDiarrhoea: End of TreatmentFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: End of Treatment
Ixazomib + LenDex56.4-4.161.40.356.5-1.872.6-0.578.3-5.169.5-2.540.84.542.5-3.58.11.624.02.834.3-1.125.53.424.9-5.76.718.312.30.8
Placebo + LenDex55.2-2.260.01.754.9-0.373.5-2.477.8-3.269.1-2.944.6-2.345.6-5.57.1-0.526.2-3.630.3-1.525.4-1.225.9-7.18.210.712.52.0

Change From Baseline in HRQOL Measured by EORTC-QLQ-MY20 Scale

EORTC QLQ-MY20 was a validated questionnaire to assess the overall quality of life in participants with multiple myeloma. The scale has 20 questions. Subscale and individual items include future perspective items 18-20, body image item 17, disease symptoms items 1-6, side effects of treatment items 7-16. Raw scores are averaged, and transformed to 0-100 scale, where higher score is better quality of life. Positive change indicates improvement. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Baseline to approximately 9 years

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: End of TreatmentSide-Effects: BaselineSide-Effects: End of TreatmentBody Image: BaselineBody Image: End of TreatmentFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: End of Treatment
Ixazomib + LenDex29.2-5.317.63.381.2-2.355.06.0
Placebo + LenDex30.3-3.118.01.781.7-7.857.34.4

Cmax: Maximum Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Post-dose at multiple timepoints up to 4 hours; Pre-dose at Cycle 1 Day 14, Cycles 2-3 Day 1 and Day 14, Cycles 4-11 Day 1 (Each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionnanograms per milliliter (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 1 Hour Post-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 4 Hours Post-doseCycle 1 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 2 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 3 Day 14: Pre-doseCycle 4 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 5 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 6 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 7 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 8 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 9 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 10 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 11 Day 1: Pre-doseCycle 12 Day 1: Pre-dose
Ixazomib44.74516.2537.8672.6648.5212.7638.4903.2843.5942.6032.5982.5392.5932.5362.6672.686

Number of Participants With Abnormal Serum Chemistry and Hematology Laboratory Values Based on Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)

The laboratory values assessment included serum chemistry and hematology. The Serum chemistry assessment included blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, bilirubin (total), urate, lactate dehydrogenase, phosphate, albumin, alkaline phosphatase (ALP), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), glucose, sodium, potassium, calcium, chloride, carbon dioxide (CO2), magnesium, thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH). Hematology assessment included hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelet (count), leukocytes with differential neutrophils (ANC). Participants with abnormal serum chemistry laboratory values reported as TEAEs are reported. TEAEs were defined as events that occurred after administration of the first dose of any agent in the study drug regimen and through 30 days after the last dose of any agent in the study drug regimen. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HypokalaemiaBlood creatinine increasedHypophosphataemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHyperglycaemiaHypocalcaemiaHyperkalaemiaAlanine aminotransferase increasedIron deficiencyHypercalcaemiaCreatinine renal clearance decreasedHypoalbuminaemiaAspartate aminotransferase increasedHyperuricaemiaAnaemiaThrombocytopeniaNeutropeniaNeutrophil count decreasedPlatelet count decreasedLymphopeniaFebrile neutropeniaLeukopeniaInternational normalised ratio increasedPancytopeniaIron deficiency anaemiaWhite blood cell count decreasedLymphocyte count decreased
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)3916915764310754352582439181542242420
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)336961076711212025334155677643112
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)3312311816123421713152144813422401133
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)1692874133126251257153611605312151

Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline to Worst Value in Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Score

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale score ranged from 0 to 5, where 0 indicated normal activity and 5 indicated death. The data is reported for those categories where at least 1 participant had worst post-baseline value for each ECOG score. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: Up to approximately 9 years

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 0Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 0, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 0Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 1, Post-Baseline Score 4Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 1Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 2Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 3Baseline Score 2, Post-Baseline Score 4
Ixazomib + LenDex2352231011045794835113
Placebo + LenDex235720219672186122872

Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death; is life-threatening; requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. (NCT01850524)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to end of study (up to approximately 9 years)

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)191125
Ixazomib+ LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)163119
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure ≥19 Cycles)189119
Placebo + LenDex (Exposure Up to 18 Cycles)160105

Part A: Change From Baseline in 12-lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings: QT Interval - Fridericia's Correction Formula

12-lead ECG were recorded after the participants have rested for at least 15 minutes in supine position. Change from baseline in 12-Lead ECG findings that is QT interval - Fridericia's correction formula at pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 were reported. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), pre-dose on Cycle 2 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Mean)
M3258 10 mg QD-10.0
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week6.3
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week6.0

Part A: Mutilple Dose: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M3258

Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 8 or Cycle 1 Day 15: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
M3258 10 mg QDNA
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week213
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week511

Part A: Number of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs) as Per National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) Version 5.0

DLT: any of adverse events (AEs), assessed by Investigator and/Sponsor at any dose, regimen, and judged not to be related to underlying disease/any previous/concomitant medication/concurrent condition during first cycle of study treatment. DLT was confirmed by Safety Monitoring Committee. DLTs: Grade (Gr) greater than/equal to (>=) 3 nonhematologic AE with exception of: Single laboratory values out of abnormal range; Gr3 diarrhea persisting less than or equal to [<=] 72 hour (hr); Nausea and vomiting <= 72 hr; Transient Gr3 fatigue, local reactions, flu-like symptoms <= 72 hr; Gr3 nonrecurrent skin toxicity; Asymptomatic Gr >= 3 lipase/amylase elevation. Any Gr >= 4 hematologic AE: Gr >= 3 febrile neutropenia with Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) <1000 per cube millimeter and temperature of >38.3 Celsius (°C); Gr >= 3 thrombocytopenia; Gr4 thrombocytopenia lasting >7 days. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Day 1 up to Day 28

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
M3258 10 mg QD1
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week0
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week1

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) Outside of Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT) Period That Safety Monitoring Committee Deems Relevant for Determination of the Maximum Tolerated Dose

Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Day 29 up to 20.1 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
M3258 10 mg QD0
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week0
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0

Part A: Single Dose: Area Under Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) From Time Zero to Last Sampling Time (AUC0-t) of M3258

Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to the last sampling time t at which the concentration was at or above the lower limit of quantification (LLOQ). AUC0-t was calculated according to the mixed log-linear trapezoidal rule. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionhour*nanogram per milliliter (h*ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week2000
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week3300

Part A: Single Dose: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of M3258

Cmax was obtained directly from the concentration versus time curve. Single dose PK data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1: Pre-dose 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 24 hours post-dose (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionnanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) (Geometric Mean)
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week153
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week215

Number of Participants With Shift From Baseline Grade Less Than (<) 3 in Clinical Laboratory Parameters to Grade Greater Than or Equal to (>=) 3 on Treatment

Laboratory parameters included hematology, chemistry, and coagulation. Number of participants with shifts from baseline (Grade <3) to >= Grade 3 were reported as per NCI-CTCAE, v5.0 graded from Grade 1 to 5. Grade 1: Mild, Grade 2: Moderate; Grade 3: Severe. Grade 4: Life-threatening and Grade 5: Death. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
HematologyChemistryCoagulation
M3258 10 mg QD200
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week300
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week430

Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio

Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 10 mg QD0.000-0.005

Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio

Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0.0000.0100.000

Part A: Change From Baseline in Free Light Chain Ratio

Change from baseline in free light chain ratio was reported at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week0.0000.0000.0000.000-0.010-0.010

Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis

Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventiongram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean)
End of Study Intervention
M3258 10 mg QD0.100

Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis

Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventiongram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0.0000.1001.223

Part A: Change From Baseline in Serum Monoclonal (M)-Protein Level Measured Using Electrophoresis

Change from baseline in serum monoclonal (M)-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventiongram per deciliter (g/dL) (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week-0.1130.1070.0500.1000.678

Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis

Change from baseline in urine M-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionmilligrams per day (mg/day) (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week26.5067.00

Part A: Change From Baseline in Urine M-protein Level Using Electrophoresis

Change from baseline in urine M-protein level was measured by using electrophoresis at Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline, Cycle 2 Day 1, Cycle 3 Day 1, Cycle 4 Day 1, Cycle 5 Day 1, Cycle 6 Day 1 and end of study intervention (Week 20.1) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionmilligrams per day (mg/day) (Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1Cycle 3 Day 1Cycle 4 Day 1Cycle 5 Day 1Cycle 6 Day 1End of Study Intervention
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week25.25256.00-130.00268.003320.00610.50

Part A: Multiple Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15)

Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), Pre-dose, 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 2 hours post-dose
M3258 10 mg QD0.260.25

Part A: Multiple Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15)

Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 pre-dose (Baseline), Pre-dose, 2 and 6 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15) (each Cycle is of 28 days)

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): Pre-doseCycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 2 hours post-doseCycle 1 Day 8 (or Day 15): 6 hours post-dose
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week0.3640.2020.178
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0.310.2990.22

Part A: Number of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance: Baseline Score Versus (Vs) Worst Post-baseline Score

ECOG performance status measured to assess participant's performance status on a scale of 0 to 5, where 0 = Fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease activities without restriction; 1 = Restricted in physically strenuous activity, ambulatory and able to carry out light or sedentary work; 2 = Ambulatory and capable of all selfcare but unable to carry out any work activities; 3 = Capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed/chair for more than 50 percent of waking hours; 4 = Completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed/chair; 5 = dead. ECOG performance status was reported in terms of number of participants with shifts in score from baseline value vs worst post-baseline value (that is [i.e.] highest score). (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 0, worst post-baseline score 5Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 1, worst post-baseline score 5Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 2, worst post-baseline score 5Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 3, worst post-baseline score 5Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 4, worst post-baseline score 5Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 0Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 1Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 2Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 3Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 4Baseline score 5, worst post-baseline score 5
M3258 10 mg QD010000100000000000000000000000000000
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week020000110000000000000000000000000000
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week010100001100000000000000000000000000

Part A: Number of Participants With Overall Response (OR) as Assessed by Investigator Using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria

OR is defined as a best overall response of stringent complete response (sCR), complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR) or partial response (PR) based on the IMWG Criteria: sCR: CR (negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow); normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and no clonal cells in bone marrow; VGPR: Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis/>= 90% reduction in serum M-protein and urine M-protein level < 100 mg/24 hours; PR: >= 50% reduction of serum M-Protein and reduction in urinary M-protein by >= 90%/to < 200 mg/24 hours. In addition to the above, if present at baseline a >= 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas is also required. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first dose of study treatment up to 18.2 months

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Stringent Complete ResponseComplete ResponseVery good Partial ResponsePartial Response
M3258 10 mg QD0000
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week0000
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0000

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Event (TEAEs) and Treatment-Related Adverse Event (TRAEs)

Adverse Event (AE): any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered with a study drug, which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. TEAEs: events that started from first dose of study intervention to 30 days after end of study intervention, or the cutoff date, whichever occurred first. TEAEs included both serious TEAEs (Serious AE: AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect) and non-serious TEAEs. TRAEs are defined as those AEs which are reasonably related to the study intervention. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Participants with TEAEsParticipants with TRAEs
M3258 10 mg QD22
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week43
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week43

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Body Temperature Increase

The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in increased Body Temperature (degree Celsius [°C]) were reported by using criteria: Baseline temperature (temp.) less than (<) 37°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and greater than or equal to (>=)3°C; Baseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. 39-<40°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C; Baseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change <1°C, 1 - <2°C, 2 - <3°C and >=3°C. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Baseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change <1°CBaseline temp.<37°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°CBaseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°CBaseline temp. <37°C, on treatment change >=3°CBaseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change <1°CBaseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°CBaseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°CBaseline temp. 37 - <38°C, on treatment change >=3°CBaseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change <1°CBaseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°CBaseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°CBaseline temp. 38 - <39°C, on treatment change >=3°CBaseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change <1°CBaseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°CBaseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°CBaseline temp. 39 - <40°C, on treatment change >=3°CBaseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change <1°CBaseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 1 - <2°CBaseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change 2 - <3°CBaseline temp. >=40°C, on treatment change >=3°C
M3258 10 mg QD02000000000000000000
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week10012000000000000000
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week21001000000000000000

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Respiration Rate Increase/Decrease

The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) maximal Respiration Rate (RR) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS RR <20 breaths per minute (breaths/min), on TR change (ch) =<5 breaths/min, >5 - =<10 breaths/min and >10 breaths/min. Ic./Dc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/min, >5 - =<10 breaths/min and >10 breaths/min. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ic. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/minIc.BS RR<20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - = <10 breaths/minIc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/minIc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/minIC.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/minIc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/minDc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/minDc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR Ch >5 - =<10 breaths/minDc. BS RR <20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/minDc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch =<5 breaths/minDc.BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >5 - =<10 breaths/minDc. BS RR >=20 breaths/min, on TR ch >10 breaths/min
M3258 10 mg QD200000200000
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week110200200200
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week220000400000

Part A: Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Changes From Baseline in Vital Signs - Maximal Systolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease and Maximal Diastolic Blood Pressure Increase/Decrease

The number of participants with treatment-emergent changes from baseline (BS) in Increase (Ic.)/Decrease (Dc.) Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) (millimeter of mercury [mmHg]) were reported by using criteria: Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP <140/<90 mmHg, on maximal treatment (TR) change =<20 mmHg, >20 - =<40 mmHg and >40 mmHg; Ic./Dc. BS SBP/DBP >=140/>=90 mmHg, on maximal TR change =<20 mmHg, >20 - =<40 mmHg and >40 mmHg. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Time from first treatment up to 30 days after end of study intervention (assessed up to 24.3 weeks)

,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Ic. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgIc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgIc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgIc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgIc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgIc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgDc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgDc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgDc. BS SBP <140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgDc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgDc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgDc. BS SBP >=140 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgIc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgIc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgIc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgIc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgIc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgIc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgDc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgDc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgDc. BS DBP <90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHgDc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change =<20 mmHgDc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg,on TR change >20 - =<40 mmHgDc. BS DBP >=90 mmHg, on TR change >40 mmHg
M3258 10 mg QD011000200000110000200000
M3258 10 mg Twice Per Week111100300100111100300100
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week111100300100300100300100

Part A: Single Dose: Ratio to Baseline in Large Multifunctional Protease 7 (LMP7) Activity at Cycle 1 Day 1

Ratio to baseline was calculated dividing post-baseline measurements by the baseline measurement. Single dose Pd data on Day 1 were summarized by dose level, such that all 10 mg arms were combined as descriptive statistics of PK were only calculated for N greater than (>) 2 in which a measurement of greater than (>) lower limit of quantification (LLOQ) represents a valid measurement. (NCT04075721)
Timeframe: Baseline (Pre-dose), 2, 6 and 24 hours post-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 (each Cycle is of 28 days)

,
Interventionratio (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1: 2 hours post-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 6 hours post-doseCycle 1 Day 1: 24 hours post-dose
M3258 10 mg QD or Twice Per Week0.3080.3370.387
M3258 20 mg Twice Per Week0.3700.1780.262

Accumulation Ratio: Day 15 AUC0-168 / Day 1 AUC0-168 for MLN2238

MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Interventionunitless (Mean)
1.68 mg/m^22.64
2.23 mg/m^21.45
2.97 mg/m^22.25
3.95 mg/m^21.19
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)2.25
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)2.19
PI naïve1.97
Carfilzomib2.37

Emax: Maximum Inhibition

A Whole Blood 20S Proteasome Inhibition Parameter. There were no subjects in the Pharmacodynamic (PD) Analysis Set for the 2.23 mg/m^2 cohort, so PD tables do not include that arm. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

InterventionPercentage of inhibition (Mean)
0.24 mg/m^2NA
0.48 mg/m^2NA
0.80 mg/m^2NA
1.20 mg/m^2NA
1.68 mg/m^2NA
2.23 mg/m^2NA
2.97 mg/m^2NA
3.95 mg/m^2NA
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)NA
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)NA
PI naïveNA
CarfilzomibNA

Number of Participants Reporting One or More Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events

"An Adverse Event is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (eg, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an adverse event with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug.~A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) was any experience that suggests a significant hazard, contraindication, side effect or precaution that: results in death, is life-threatening, required in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is medically significant." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: From the first dose through 30 days after last dose of ixazomib citrate or until the start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 354 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
0.24 mg/m^23
0.48 mg/m^23
0.80 mg/m^22
1.20 mg/m^23
1.68 mg/m^24
2.23 mg/m^23
2.97 mg/m^28
3.95 mg/m^25
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)11
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)10
PI naïve6
Carfilzomib4

TEmax: Time of Occurrence of Emax

(NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

InterventionHours (Mean)
0.24 mg/m^2NA
0.48 mg/m^2NA
0.80 mg/m^2NA
1.20 mg/m^2NA
1.68 mg/m^2NA
2.23 mg/m^2NA
2.97 mg/m^2NA
3.95 mg/m^2NA
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)NA
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)NA
PI naïveNA
CarfilzomibNA

Terminal Elimination Rate Constant (λz) for MLN2238

Terminal elimination rate constant (λz) is the rate at which drugs are eliminated from the body and the values were used for calculation of T1/2. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Intervention1/hour (Mean)
0.80 mg/m^20.000
1.20 mg/m^20.000
1.68 mg/m^20.000
2.23 mg/m^20.00
2.97 mg/m^20.00
3.95 mg/m^20.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)0.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)0.00
PI naïve0.01
Carfilzomib0.01

Terminal Phase Elimination Half-life (T1/2) for MLN2238

Terminal phase elimination half-life (T1/2) is the time required for half of the drug to be eliminated from the plasma. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Day 15 of Cycle 1

Interventionhour (Mean)
0.80 mg/m^2271.00
1.20 mg/m^2190.50
1.68 mg/m^2189.00
2.23 mg/m^2175.00
2.97 mg/m^2246.00
3.95 mg/m^2165.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)186.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)202.33
PI naïve123.90
Carfilzomib108.00

AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for MLN2238

AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (tau) (AUC[0-tau]), where tau is the length of the dosing interval - 168 hours in this study). MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=0,0,0,0,2,1,3,4,3,5,4,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=0,0,2,0,2,1,2,1,1,4,3,2)
0.24 mg/m^2NANA
0.48 mg/m^2NANA
0.80 mg/m^2NA398.50
1.20 mg/m^2NANA
1.68 mg/m^2258.00663.00
2.23 mg/m^2598.00868.00
2.97 mg/m^21269.673100.00
3.95 mg/m^21371.251460.00
Carfilzomib813.672075.00
PI naïve750.251549.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)1793.333690.00
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)854.201777.75

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for MLN2238

Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of a drug after administration, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^23.0103.64
0.48 mg/m^22.914.64
0.80 mg/m^25.756.89
1.20 mg/m^215.1017.90
1.68 mg/m^213.8317.63
2.23 mg/m^229.059.24
2.97 mg/m^265.46100.55
3.95 mg/m^2123.95134.00
Carfilzomib83.7355.10
PI naïve77.70118.05
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)75.9250.46
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)110.4393.68

Neurotoxicity Grading

Neurotoxicity is graded using participant responses to 11 functional questions on a 5-point scale, where 0=Not at all and 4=Very much, using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecology Oncology Group - Neurotoxicity Questionnaire, Version 4.0(14). Neurotoxicity subscale is a sum of 11 reversed item scores where each original score is transformed as (4 - score). The highest possible score is 44, and a higher score indicates more neurotoxicity. (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Day 1 and End of Study (Up to 354 days)

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=2,3,3,3,4,3,7,4,9,8,6,4)End of Study (n=3,3,2,1,1,3,4,3,8,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^236.0025.00
0.48 mg/m^240.3340.67
0.80 mg/m^242.0038.50
1.20 mg/m^236.0035.00
1.68 mg/m^239.5042.00
2.23 mg/m^236.8036.00
2.97 mg/m^233.1436.00
3.95 mg/m^238.5033.33
Carfilzomib32.0027.33
PI naïve38.0037.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)38.4433.88
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)33.7327.24

Overall Response to Treatment With Ixazomib Citrate Based on Investigator's Evaluation Over Time

"Responses were based on International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Criteria. Complete Response (CR)=Negative immunofixation on serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow.~Partial Response (PR)= reduction in M-Protein ≥50% in serum and ≥90% in 24-hour urine. If M-protein unmeasurable, ≥50% decrease in difference of involved and uninvolved Free Light Chain (FLC). If M-protein and FLC unmeasurable, ≥50% reduction in plasma cells is required, if baseline bone marrow plasma cell ≥30%. And ≥50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas.~Minimal Response (MR)= 25-49% reduction in serum paraprotein for 6 weeks. 50-89% reduction in 24 hour urinary light chain excretion for 6 weeks. For Non-secretory myeloma patients, 25-49 % reduction in plasma cells in bone marrow and trephine biopsy for a 6 weeks. 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. No increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions." (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Up to 354 days

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + PRCR + PR + MR
0.24 mg/m^200
0.48 mg/m^200
0.80 mg/m^200
1.20 mg/m^200
1.68 mg/m^200
2.23 mg/m^200
2.97 mg/m^22525
3.95 mg/m^22525
Carfilzomib2525
PI naïve1717
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)918
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)2233

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for MLN2238

Tmax: Time to reach the maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time to Cmax. MLN2238 is the complete hydrolysis product of the study drug ixazomib citrate (MLN9708). (NCT00963820)
Timeframe: Days 1 and 15 of Cycle 1

,,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1 (n=1,1,2,1,3,2,5,4,5,8,5,3)Cycle 1 Day 15 (n=3,1,3,2,2,1,2,1,5,5,4,3)
0.24 mg/m^21.501.07
0.48 mg/m^21.530.50
0.80 mg/m^21.521.83
1.20 mg/m^21.001.00
1.68 mg/m^21.521.27
2.23 mg/m^21.258.00
2.97 mg/m^21.001.25
3.95 mg/m^21.001.03
Carfilzomib1.421.03
PI naïve1.001.00
Relapsed and Refractory (RR)2.001.50
VELCADE-relapsed (VR)0.501.00

Phase 1: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib Administered Weekly in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone

MTD of ixazomib will be determined by assessing adverse events and serious adverse events, clinical laboratory values, neurotoxicity grading, and vital sign measurements. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1: Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.97

Phase 1: Rac: Accumulation Ratio of Ixazomib

The accumulation ratio (Rac) was estimated as the ratio of AUC(0-168) on Day 15 to the AUC(0-168) on Day 1. AUC(0-168) is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15

InterventionRatio (Geometric Mean)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.849
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.051

Phase 1: Recommended Phase 2 Dose of Ixazomib Given in Combination With Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone

RP2D will be determined based on number and type of adverse event and serious adverse events, assessments of clinical laboratory values, neurotoxicity grading, and treatment discontinuation. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Phase 1: Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.23

Phase 2: 1 Year Survival Rate

1-year survival rate is defined as the percentage of participants still alive at year after the first dose of stud drug. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: 1 year after first dose of study drug

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone92
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone92

Phase 2: Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response (CR + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD). Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR) Following Treatment With the Combination Of Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide And Low-Dose Dexamethasone

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete (CR) + Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) assessed by the investigatory using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or; 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone59
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone62

Phase 2: Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the investigator using IMWG criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by 90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone88
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone88

Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)

OS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of death + 1 day. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of death (up to 787 days)

Interventionparticipants (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

Phase 2: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

PFS was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented PD or death. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.98
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

Phase 2: Time to Best Response

Time to Best Response was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented documentation of a confirmed response of partial response (PR) or better. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Up to 787 days

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2.96
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone3.01

Phase 2: Time to Progression (TTP)

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD). (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study treatment to the date of first documented progressive disease (Up to 787 days)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA

Phase 1: AUC(0-168): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 168 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

AUC(0-168) is a measure of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 168 hours postdose for Ixazomib. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 3, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA834.608
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone587.6671083.998
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone923.4841831.324
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNANA

Phase 1: Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) is the peak plasma concentration of ixazomib obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionng/mL (Geometric Mean)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNA11.999
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.30331.368
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone94.77953.517
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + DexamethasoneNANA

Phase 1: Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 336 days)

,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any AESAE
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone32
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone33
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone61
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone32

Phase 1: Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

Tmax: Time to reach the first maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax), equal to time (hours) to Cmax, obtained directly from the plasma concentration-time curve. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 15

,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1 (n=1, 3, 4, 1)Day 15 (n=2, 3, 4, 1)
Phase 1: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.0204.165
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.5201.000
Phase 1: Ixazomib 2.97 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone1.0601.015
Phase 1: Ixazomib 3.95 mg/m^2 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0.2502.000

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR)

Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: After Cycles 3, 6 and 9 (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
After 3 cyclesAfter 6 cyclesAfter 9 cycles
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone354757
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone374858

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR), Stringent Complete Response (sCR), Very Good Partial Response (VGPR), Near Complete Response (nCR), Partial Response (PR) and Minimal Response (MR)

Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine + Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. sCR= CR + Normal free light chain (FLC) ratio and Absence of clonal cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to < 200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR= Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. nCR=Positive immunofixation analysis of serum or urine as the only evidence of disease. Disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. MR=25% to 49% reduction in serum paraprotein and 50% to 89% reduction in urine light chain excretion for 6 weeks. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Cycles 3, 6, 9 and 12 (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CRsCRVGPRnCRPRMR
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone206392676
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone2310382656

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Grade 3 or Higher AEs, SAEs and Treatment Discontinuation

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01217957)
Timeframe: Until occurrence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity (Up to 787 days)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Grade 3 or Higher AEsSAEsAEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation
Phase 2 :Ixazomib 4.0 mg + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone76408
Phase 2: Ixazomib 4.0 mg/2.23 + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75438

Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) of Ixazomib

MTD was highest dose of Ixazomib, at which <=1 of 6 participants experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during Cycle 1 of Phase 1. DLT was defined as any of following considered possibly related to therapy: Grade 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count [ANC] <500 cell per cubic millimeter [cells/mm^3]) for >7 days;Grade 3 neutropenia with fever or infection; Grade 4 thrombocytopenia (platelets < 25,000/mm^3) for >7 days;Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; platelet count <10,000/mm^3; Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or >=Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; >=Grade 3 nausea/emesis, diarrhea controlled by supportive therapy; Grade 3 QTc prolongation (QTc >500 millisecond [msec]);any >=Grade 3 nonhematologic toxicity except Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia; or <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; delay in initiation of the subsequent therapy cycle by >2 weeks; other >=Grade 2 study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities requiring therapy discontinuation. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (21 days)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Ixazomib (All Groups)2

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs Reported as TEAEs

The number of participants with any clinically significant changes in vital signs collected throughout the study that were reported as TEAEs. Measurement of vital signs, included oral temperature, blood pressure, and heart rate. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20

Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of Ixazomib

The RP2D of Ixazomib was determined in Part 1 (dose escalation) on the basis of the totality of safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamic data observed in Cycle 1 and beyond. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 through Cycle 39 (Up to 28.3 months)

Interventionmg/m^2 (Number)
Ixazomib (All Groups)2

T1/2: Terminal Disposition Phase Elimination Half-life for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose

Interventionhr (Mean)
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2135.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2126.50
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2129.33
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2105.88
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^292.70
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2115.85
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2123.06
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2124.93
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2134.00

λz: Terminal Disposition Phase Rate Constant for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 11: predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

Intervention1/hr (Mean)
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^20.005
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20.005
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20.006
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.007
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^20.008
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.006
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.006
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20.006
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.005

AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 11
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^256.53
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^2177.67

AUC(0-72): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 72 Hours Postdose for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 72 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2509.001010.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2109.00458.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2159.05605.00
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2251.00808.50
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2449.001435.60
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2416.501915.00
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2410.002297.20
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2451.64903.85
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2351.00937.86

AUC(0-last): Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to the Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2509.0001010.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^23.38356.533
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^220.700177.667
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^2109.000458.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^2159.050605.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^2251.000808.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2449.0001435.600
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2416.5001915.000
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^2410.0002297.200
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2418.175903.846
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2351.000937.857

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^226.60027.200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^22.1202.837
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^210.1908.857
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^222.20031.650
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^229.00056.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^221.100101.100
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^268.16785.420
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^2117.933105.450
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^285.600109.660
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^258.90059.871
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^259.34361.800

Number of Participants With a TEAE of Peripheral Neuropathy

Neurotoxicity was assessed as the number of participants with the TEAE of peripheral neuropathy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Neuropathy PeripheralPeripheral Sensory Neuropathy
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^201
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^210
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^200
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^210
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^230
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^230

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Abnormalities Reported as TEAEs

The number of participants with any clinically significant abnormal standard safety laboratory values collected throughout the study reported as TEAEs. Parameters assessed were hematology, serum chemistry and urinalysis. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Blood Creatinine IncreasedBlood Urea IncreasedWhite Blood Cell Count DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedAlanine Aminotransferase IncreasedLiver Function Test IncreasedBlood Calcium IncreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedHaematocrit DecreasedHaemoglobin Decreased
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^21000001000
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^20010000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21000000000
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21011000100
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20100000000
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22000110000
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22101000011

Number of Participants With One or More Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a medicinal investigational drug. The untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with treatment. An SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that results in death;is life-threatening;requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of present hospitalization;results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity;is a congenital anomaly/birth defect;or is a medically important event that may not be immediately life-threatening or result in death or hospitalization, but may jeopardize the participant or may require intervention to prevent one of other outcomes listed in definition above, or involves suspected transmission via a medicinal product of an infectious agent. A TEAE is defined as an AE that occurs after administration of first dose of study drug and through 30 days after last dose of study drug or until start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug or start of subsequent antineoplastic therapy (Up to 81.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
AEsSAEs
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^222
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^232
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^232
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^230
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^275
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^243
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^263
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^22014
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2126

Overall Response Rate (ORR)

ORR is defined as percentage of participants with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) or minimal response (MR) as assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group Uniform Response criteria. CR=Negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. PR=≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-h urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg /24 h. MR=25-49% reduction in the serum monoclonal paraprotein maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 50-89% reduction in 24-h urinary light chain excretion, which still exceeds 200 mg/24 h, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; for participants with non-secretory myeloma only, 25-49% reduction in plasma cells in a bone marrow aspirate and on trephine biopsy, if biopsy is performed, maintained for a minimum of 6 weeks; 25-49% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas; no increase in the size or number of lytic bone lesions. (NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 through Cycle 115 (Up to 80.1 months)

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR+PRCR+PR+MR
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^23333
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^200
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^25050
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^23333
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2510
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^2918

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT00932698)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Days 1 and 11: Predose and at multiple time points (Up to 264 hours) postdose

,,,,,,,,,,
Interventionhours (Median)
Day 1Day 11
Carfilzomib Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0001.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 1: Ixazomib 0.24 mg/m^21.0001.100
Dose Escalation Cohort 2: Ixazomib 0.48 mg/m^21.0001.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 3: Ixazomib 0.8 mg/m^20.7751.275
Dose Escalation Cohort 4: Ixazomib 1.2 mg/m^20.7750.500
Dose Escalation Cohort 5: Ixazomib 1.68 mg/m^21.0001.000
Dose Escalation Cohort 6: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0000.667
Dose Escalation Cohort 7: Ixazomib 2.23 mg/m^21.0000.832
Proteasome Inhibitor-Naive Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2 mg/m^20.5251.500
Relapsed and Refractory Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^21.0001.010
Velcade-Relapsed (VR) Expansion Cohort: Ixazomib 2.0 mg/m^20.6170.583

Combined Response Rate During the Induction Phase in Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Participants

Combined Response Rate is the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR), including stringent Complete Response (sCR), and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria during the Induction Phase (Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles). CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)27
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)24

Duration of Response (DOR) in NDMM Participants

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the initiation of alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 Months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)32.2
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)36.6

Duration of Response (DOR) in RRMM Participants

DOR is defined as the time from the date of first documentation of a confirmed PR or better to the date of first documented PD up to the alternative therapy. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)26.3

Overall Response Rate (ORR) in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Participants

ORR is the percentage of participants with CR, VGPR or PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and <5% plasma cells (PC) in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved free light chain (FLC) levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28 day cycle (Up to 45 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Mean)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)49

Progression Free Survival (PFS) in NDMM Participants

PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)23.5
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)23.0

Progression Free Survival (PFS) in RRMM Participants

PFS is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented disease progression or death. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)14.2

Time to Progression (TTP) in NDMM Participants

TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)30.9
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)32.2

Time to Progression (TTP) in RRMM Participants

TTP is defined as the time from the date of first dose of study treatment to the date of first documentation of disease progression. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)16.8

Time to Response (TTR) in NDMM Participants During the Induction Phase

TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the initiation of alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 1 year

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)2.2
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.9

Time to Response (TTR) in RRMM Participants

TTR is defined as the time interval from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented confirmed response of PR or better up to the alternative therapy in a participant who responded. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Up to 45 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)2.1

AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)885.1671338.333
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)792.6001226.600

AUCtau: Area Under the Concentration-time Curve During a Dosing Interval for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)518.1671241.000

Change From Baseline in EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) in RRMM Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of End of Treatment (EOT) (Up to 45 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL at EOTPhysical functioning, Change from BL at EOTRole functioning, Change from BL at EOTEmotional functioning, Change from BL at EOTCognitive functioning, Change from BL at EOTSocial functioning, Change from BL at EOTFatigue, Change from BL at EOTNausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at EOTPain, Change from BL at EOTDyspnea, Change from BL at EOTInsomnia, Change from BL at EOTAppetite Loss, Change from BL at EOTConstipation, Change from BL at EOTDiarrhea, Change from BL at EOTFinancial Difficulties, Change from BL at EOT
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)-5.50-6.00-7.67-5.00-5.33-11.335.113.335.0010.00-6.004.672.006.004.00

Change From Baseline in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) During the Induction Phase in NDMM Participants

EORTC QLQ-C30 is a patient completed 30 item questionnaire that consists of 5 functional scales (physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning, and social functioning), 1 global health status scale, 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, and pain), and 6 single items (dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). The patient evaluates their health status over the previous week. There are 28 questions answered on a 4-point scale where1=Not at all (best) to 4=Very Much (worst) and 2 questions answered on a 7-point scale where 1=Very poor (worst) to 7= Excellent (best). All of the scales and single-item measures are transformed to a score:0 to 100. For functioning scales and global QOL higher scores indicate better functioning (a positive change from Baseline indicates improvement); for symptom scales higher scores indicate more severe symptoms (a negative change from Baseline indicates improvement). (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Baseline (BL) (Day 1 of Cycle 1), Day 1 of Cycle 13 (Up to 1 year)

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Status/QoL, Change from BL; Cycle 13Physical functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Role functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Emotional functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Cognitive functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Social functioning, Change from BL at Cycle 13Fatigue, Change from BL at Cycle 13Nausea/Vomiting, Change from BL at Cycle 13Pain, Change from BL at Cycle 13Dyspnea, Change from BL at Cycle 13Insomnia, Change from BL at Cycle 13Appetite Loss, Change from BL at Cycle 13Constipation, Change from BL at Cycle 13Diarrhea, Change from BL at Cycle 13Financial Difficulties, Change from BL at Cycle 13
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)3.4714.178.3311.342.789.03-10.88-4.86-13.89-11.11-16.67-18.06-13.89-2.784.17
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)-5.4317.976.522.54-7.25-11.59-6.76-4.35-10.87-7.25-10.14-7.25-5.805.801.45

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionnanogram/mL (ng/mL) (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)64.28353.145
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)46.60062.280

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)47.40052.229

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) in NDMM Participants

"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEGrade 3 or Higher AEsAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose ReductionSAEs
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)352791117
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)3427111020

Number of Participants With AEs, Grade 3 or Higher AEs, AEs Resulting in Treatment Discontinuation, AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction, SAEs in RRMM Participants

"An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product; the untoward medical occurrence does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AEGrade 3 or Higher AEAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose ReductionSAEs
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)7249193030

Number of Participants With AEs, SAEs, AEs Resulting in Discontinuation and AEs Resulting in Dose Reduction in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles

"An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product whether or not it is related to the medicinal product. This includes any newly occurring event, or a previous condition that has increased in severity or frequency since the administration of study drug.~A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of an existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability or incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect or is a medically important event. Relationship of each AE to study drug was determined by the Investigator." (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: First dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of drug (Up to 45 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Any AESAEAEs Resulting in Treatment DiscontinuationAEs Resulting in Dose Reduction
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)22615
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)20424

Percentage of Participants With (CR + VGPR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD in RRMM Participants

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)19514443710

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR + VGPR, CR, VGPR, PR, SD and PD Throughout the Entire Treatment Period in NDMM Participants

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCR + VGPRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)8236152167180
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)7132122159186

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR and Stable Disease (SD), Progressive Disease (PD) During the Induction Phase

Percentage of participants with CR + VGPR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, PR, SD, PD according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. SD=not meeting criteria for VGPR, PR or PD. PD=25% increase in lowest value any of the following: serum M-component, urine M-component, difference between involved and uninvolved FLC levels, bone marrow PC percentage; new or increase in size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of Cycles 1-13, 28-day cycles (Up to 1 year)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCRVGPRPRSDPD
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)79121567120
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)7191562183

Percentage of Participants With CR + VGR + PR (ORR), CR, VGPR, and PR in NDMM Participants Remaining on Treatment After 13 Cycles

Percentage of participants with Overall Response (CR + VGPR + PR), CR, VGPR and PR according to IMWG criteria. CR=negative immunofixation of serum and urine; disappearance of soft tissue plasmacytomas;<5% PC in bone marrow. VGPR=serum and urine M-component detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% reduction in serum M-component plus urine M-component <100 mg/24 hour. PR=50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24 hour urine M-protein by 90% or <200 mg/24 hour or decrease 50% difference between involved FLC levels or 50% reduction in bone marrow plasma cells if baseline percentage was 30%; and if present at Baseline, 50% reduction in the size of soft tissue plasmacytomas. (NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each 28-day Cycle (Up to 45 months)

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
CR + VGPR + PRCRVGPRPR
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)75.016.720.837.5
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)85.719.028.638.1

Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in NDMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168 hours) postdose

,
Interventionhour (hr) (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.2501.000
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 400 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (NDMM)1.0401.000

Tmax: Time to First Occurrence of Cmax for Ixazomib in RRMM Participants

(NCT02046070)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 Days 1 and 15 predose and at multiple timepoints (up to 168) hours postdose

Interventionhr (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 15
Ixazomib 4.0 mg + CYC 300 mg/m^2 + DEX 40 mg (RRMM)1.2252.000

AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone685.9

AUClast: Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of the Last Quantifiable Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhr*ng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone1746.0

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone37.57

Cmax: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone57.57

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was defined as the length of time between the date of first documented response (PR, VGPR, or CR) and the date of first documented progressive disease (PD). According to IMWG criteria: CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From date of documentation of a confirmed response to date of progressive disease, (approximately 20 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone12.9

Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)

DLT was defined as any of the following AEs that were considered by investigator to be possibly related to therapy: 1. Grade 4 neutropenia lasting at least 7 consecutive days; 2. Grade 3 neutropenia with fever and/or infection; 3. Grade 4 thrombocytopenia at least 7 consecutive days; 4. Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding; 5. Platelet count <10,000/mm^3; 6. Grade 2 peripheral neuropathy with pain or ≥Grade 3 peripheral neuropathy; 7. Grade 3 or greater nausea and / or emesis despite the use of optimal anti-emetic prophylaxis; 8. Grade 3 or greater diarrhea that occurred despite maximal supportive therapy; 9. Any other Grade 3 or greater nonhematologic toxicity with the following exceptions: Grade 3 arthralgia/myalgia, <1 week Grade 3 fatigue; 10. A delay of >2 weeks in the subsequent cycle of treatment; 11. Other combination study drug-related nonhematologic toxicities ≥Grade 2 that, in the opinion of the investigator, required discontinuation of study drug. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1 (up to Day 28)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone2

Percentage of Participants With Confirmed Best Response Category

Percentage of participants who achieve or maintain any best response category during the treatment period were reported. Best response includes complete response (CR), very good partial response (VGPR), and partial response (PR). Response was assessed according to IMWG criteria. CR: negative immunofixation on serum and urine, disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and ≤5% plasma cells in bone marrow; PR: ≥50% reduction of serum M-protein and reduction in 24-hour urinary M-protein by ≥90% or to <200 mg per 24 hours. VGPR: serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or ≥90% reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level <100 mg per 24 hour. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From Cycle 1, Day 1 to Cycle 3, Day 1 until disease progression (approximately 20 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone53.5

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 1 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 168 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone1.5

Tmax: Time to Reach the Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) for Ixazomib

(NCT01645930)
Timeframe: Cycle 1, Day 15 pre-dose and multiple time-points (up to 336 hours) post-dose

Interventionhours (Median)
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone2.0

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose: results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or causes prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, or was a medically important event. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone4318

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Adverse Events of ≥Grade 3 Intensity

Clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were defined as any test results which were observed beyond the clinically acceptable limits as per the discretion of investigator. Clinical laboratory tests included chemistry, hematology and urinalysis tests. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Alanine Aminotransferase IncreasedAspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedBlood Creatinine IncreasedHaemoglobin DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedPlatelet Count DecreasedAnaemiaFebrile NeutropeniaNeutropeniaThrombocytopeniaHyperglycaemiaHypocalcaemiaHypokalaemiaHypomagnesaemiaHyponatraemiaHypophosphataemia
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone21112461128135112

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Reported as Adverse Events

The number of participants who meet markedly abnormal criteria for vital signs, included diastolic and systolic blood pressure, heart rate, oral temperature, respiratory rate, and body weight. (NCT01645930)
Timeframe: From the first dose of study drug through 30 days after the last dose of study drug (up to 577 days)

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Grade 1 or 2 HypertensionGrade 2 Hypotension
Ixazomib+Lenalidomide+Dexamethasone41

Reviews

36 reviews available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma

ArticleYear
Efficacy and safety of ixazomib maintenance therapy for patients with multiple myeloma: a meta-analysis.
    Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2021, Volume: 26, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Glycine; Humans; Infections; Main

2021
Efficacy of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in high-molecular-risk relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma - case series and literature review.
    Annals of agricultural and environmental medicine : AAEM, 2022, Mar-21, Volume: 29, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethas

2022
Efficacy of maintenance treatment in patients with multiple myeloma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
    Hematology (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Humans; Lenali

2022
Proteasome Inhibitors: Harnessing Proteostasis to Combat Disease.
    Molecules (Basel, Switzerland), 2020, Feb-05, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Humans; Lactones; Molecular Targeted Th

2020
Exposure to glyphosate and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma: an updated meta-analysis.
    La Medicina del lavoro, 2020, Feb-24, Volume: 111, Issue:1

    Topics: Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin; Multiple Myeloma; Occupational Exposure; Risk Fa

2020
Maintenance therapy and need for cessation studies in multiple myeloma: Focus on the future.
    Best practice & research. Clinical haematology, 2020, Volume: 33, Issue:1

    Topics: Adaptive Clinical Trials as Topic; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2020
Ixazomib-associated cardiovascular adverse events in multiple myeloma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Drug and chemical toxicology, 2022, Volume: 45, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Hypertension

2022
Pharmacology differences among proteasome inhibitors: Implications for their use in clinical practice.
    Pharmacological research, 2021, Volume: 167

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Interactions; Glycine; Humans; Mul

2021
Recent progress in relapsed multiple myeloma therapy: implications for treatment decisions.
    British journal of haematology, 2017, Volume: 179, Issue:2

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2017
Ixazomib: A Review in Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma

2017
Safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dru

2017
Pooled analysis of the reports of carfilzomib/ixazomib combinations for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Annals of hematology, 2018, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drug Administr

2018
The effect of novel therapies in high-molecular-risk multiple myeloma.
    Clinical advances in hematology & oncology : H&O, 2017, Volume: 15, Issue:11

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; D

2017
Pharmacokinetic drug evaluation of ixazomib citrate for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on drug metabolism & toxicology, 2018, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biological Availability; Boron

2018
Triplet vs. doublet drug regimens for managing multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Histone Deacetylase Inhibit

2018
Model-Informed Drug Development for Ixazomib, an Oral Proteasome Inhibitor.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2019, Volume: 105, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Biological Availability; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Develop

2019
Ixazomib in the management of relapsed multiple myeloma.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2018, Volume: 14, Issue:20

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clinical Tri

2018
Proteasome inhibitors for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:4

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Hematologic Dis

2018
Ixazomib for Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Review from an Evidence Review Group on a NICE Single Technology Appraisal.
    PharmacoEconomics, 2018, Volume: 36, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Dexamethason

2018
Proteasome inhibitors: structure and function.
    Seminars in oncology, 2017, Volume: 44, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Glycine; Hematologic Neoplasms; Humans; Lymphoma

2017
Ixazomib: a novel drug for multiple myeloma.
    Expert review of hematology, 2018, Volume: 11, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Glycine; Humans; Multiple

2018
Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2018, Volume: 19, Issue:17

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Human

2018
Ixazomib - the first oral proteasome inhibitor.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2019, Volume: 60, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron C

2019
Ixazomib: an investigational drug for the treatment of lymphoproliferative disorders.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2019, Volume: 28, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drugs, Investi

2019
New approaches to management of multiple myeloma.
    Current treatment options in oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Ac

2014
The investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Future oncology (London, England), 2015, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Boron Compounds; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drugs, Investigational; Glycine; Humans; Mul

2015
Ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2015, Volume: 24, Issue:9

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II

2015
Oral ixazomib maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.
    Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2016, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Pro

2016
Spotlight on ixazomib: potential in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Drug design, development and therapy, 2016, Volume: 10

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Drug Approval; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine;

2016
Ixazomib: First Global Approval.
    Drugs, 2016, Volume: 76, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clin

2016
Systematic review and meta-analysis of glyphosate exposure and risk of lymphohematopoietic cancers.
    Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes, 2016, Volume: 51, Issue:6

    Topics: Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Hodgkin Disease; Humans; Leukemia; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasms; Ris

2016
Safety of proteasome inhibitors for treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2017, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine; Humans; Mult

2017
Magic year for multiple myeloma therapeutics: Key takeaways from the ASH 2015 annual meeting.
    Oncotarget, 2017, Feb-07, Volume: 8, Issue:6

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Bor

2017
Management of adverse events induced by next-generation immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitors in multiple myeloma.
    Expert review of anticancer therapy, 2017, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycine; Humans; Immunolog

2017
Proteasome Inhibitors as a Potential Cause of Heart Failure.
    Heart failure clinics, 2017, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Approval; Early D

2017
[RENAL TUBULAR DISEASES, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO AMINOACIDURIA].
    Recenti progressi in medicina, 1964, Volume: 36

    Topics: Cystinosis; Cystinuria; Galactosemias; Genetics, Medical; Glycine; Hepatolenticular Degeneration; Hu

1964

Trials

47 trials available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma

ArticleYear
A phase I/II study of ixazomib, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone for lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitor refractory multiple myeloma (Alliance A061202).
    American journal of hematology, 2021, 12-01, Volume: 96, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethas

2021
A phase 2, open-label, multicenter study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone in adult Japanese patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma.
    International journal of clinical oncology, 2022, Volume: 27, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Huma

2022
Ixazomib-based induction regimens plus ixazomib maintenance in transplant-ineligible, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: the phase II, multi-arm, randomized UNITO-EMN10 trial.
    Blood cancer journal, 2021, 12-07, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boro

2021
Oral ixazomib-dexamethasone vs oral pomalidomide-dexamethasone for lenalidomide-refractory, proteasome inhibitor-exposed multiple myeloma: a randomized Phase 2 trial.
    Blood cancer journal, 2022, 01-24, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron

2022
All-oral triplet combination of ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in newly diagnosed transplant-eligible multiple myeloma patients: final results of the phase II IFM 2013-06 study.
    Haematologica, 2022, 07-01, Volume: 107, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len

2022
Ixazomib with cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in relapsed or refractory myeloma: MUKeight phase II randomised controlled trial results.
    Blood cancer journal, 2022, 04-01, Volume: 12, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cyclophosphamide; Dexamethaso

2022
A phase 1/2 study of ixazomib in place of bortezomib or carfilzomib in a subsequent line of therapy for patients with multiple myeloma refractory to their last bortezomib or carfilzomib combination regimen.
    Experimental hematology, 2022, Volume: 111

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine;

2022
Phase 2 trial of ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for previously untreated light chain amyloidosis.
    Blood advances, 2022, 09-27, Volume: 6, Issue:18

    Topics: Aged; Amyloidosis; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cycl

2022
Ixazomib for Desensitization (IXADES) in Highly Sensitized Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Phase II Clinical Trial.
    Kidney360, 2023, Jun-01, Volume: 4, Issue:6

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Kidney Transplantation; Multiple Myeloma

2023
Ixazomib-Thalidomide-Dexamethasone for induction therapy followed by Ixazomib maintenance treatment in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    British journal of cancer, 2019, Volume: 121, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex

2019
Quality of life is maintained with ixazomib maintenance in post-transplant newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: The TOURMALINE-MM3 trial.
    European journal of haematology, 2020, Volume: 104, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds;

2020
Phase I Study of Selinexor, Ixazomib, and Low-dose Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2020, Volume: 20, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Female;

2020
Real-world effectiveness and safety of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Annals of hematology, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex

2020
Deepening responses associated with improved progression-free survival with ixazomib versus placebo as posttransplant maintenance in multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia, 2020, Volume: 34, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Glycine; Hem

2020
Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation.
    European journal of haematology, 2020, Volume: 105, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberr

2020
Adverse event management in the TOURMALINE-MM3 study of post-transplant ixazomib maintenance in multiple myeloma.
    Annals of hematology, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Autografts; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Surv

2020
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Ixazomib-based frontline therapy in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in real-life practice showed comparable efficacy and safety profile with those reported in clinical trial: a multi-center study.
    Annals of hematology, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bor

2020
The MUK eight protocol: a randomised phase II trial of cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone in combination with ixazomib, in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) patients who have relapsed after treatment with thalidomide, lenalidomide and a prote
    Trials, 2020, Oct-02, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic;

2020
Ixazomib as Postinduction Maintenance for Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Not Undergoing Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation: The Phase III TOURMALINE-MM4 Trial.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2020, 12-01, Volume: 38, Issue:34

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycine; Humans; Maintena

2020
Ixazomib-Thalidomide-low dose dexamethasone induction followed by maintenance therapy with ixazomib or placebo in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients not eligible for autologous stem cell transplantation; results from the randomized phase II HOVON-1
    Haematologica, 2020, 12-01, Volume: 105, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine;

2020
Oral ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 07-01, Volume: 137, Issue:26

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2021
Ixazomib, Daratumumab, and Low-Dose Dexamethasone in Frail Patients With Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma: The Hovon 143 Study.
    Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2021, 09-01, Volume: 39, Issue:25

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bor

2021
A phase II trial of continuous ixazomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone for relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma: the Australasian Myeloma Research Consortium (AMaRC) 16-02 trial.
    British journal of haematology, 2021, Volume: 194, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Boron Com

2021
Management of adverse events associated with ixazomib plus lenalidomide/dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    British journal of haematology, 2017, Volume: 178, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2017
Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: China Continuation study.
    Journal of hematology & oncology, 2017, 07-06, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Angiogenesis Inhibitors; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compound

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Dose and Schedule Selection of the Oral Proteasome Inhibitor Ixazomib in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Clinical and Model-Based Analyses.
    Targeted oncology, 2017, Volume: 12, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Fem

2017
Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/refractory myeloma patients.
    Blood, 2017, 12-14, Volume: 130, Issue:24

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberrations

2017
The role of ixazomib as an augmented conditioning therapy in salvage autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) and as a post-ASCT consolidation and maintenance strategy in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma (ACCoRd [UK-MRA Myeloma XII] trial): study pro
    Trials, 2018, Mar-07, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drug Administration Sch

2018
Healthcare resource utilization with ixazomib or placebo plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in the randomized, double-blind, phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Journal of medical economics, 2018, Volume: 21, Issue:8

    Topics: Absenteeism; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron C

2018
Twice-weekly ixazomib in combination with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    British journal of haematology, 2018, Volume: 182, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2018
Phase 2 study of all-oral ixazomib, cyclophosphamide and low-dose dexamethasone for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    British journal of haematology, 2019, Volume: 184, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2019
All-oral ixazomib, cyclophosphamide, and dexamethasone for transplant-ineligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.
    European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2019, Volume: 106

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Austr

2019
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2019, 01-19, Volume: 393, Issue:10168

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth

2019
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2019, 01-19, Volume: 393, Issue:10168

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth

2019
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2019, 01-19, Volume: 393, Issue:10168

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth

2019
Oral ixazomib maintenance following autologous stem cell transplantation (TOURMALINE-MM3): a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial.
    Lancet (London, England), 2019, 01-19, Volume: 393, Issue:10168

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Double-Blind Meth

2019
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up including ixazomib maintenance.
    Leukemia, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex

2019
Management of Gastrointestinal Toxicities From Ixazomib: Tips to Curb Nausea, Vomiting, Diarrhea, and Constipation.
    Oncology (Williston Park, N.Y.), 2019, Mar-13, Volume: 33, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Constipation; Diarrhea; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; N

2019
Ixazomib maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An integrated analysis of four phase I/II studies.
    European journal of haematology, 2019, Volume: 102, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds;

2019
Phase 1 study of weekly dosing with the investigational oral proteasome inhibitor ixazomib in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Blood, 2014, Aug-14, Volume: 124, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Diarrhea; Dose-Response Relati

2014
Phase 1 study of twice-weekly ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients.
    Blood, 2014, Aug-14, Volume: 124, Issue:7

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Dose-Response Rela

2014
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2014
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2014
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2014
Safety and tolerability of ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone in patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma: an open-label phase 1/2 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:13

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2014
Phase 2 trial of ixazomib in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib.
    Blood cancer journal, 2015, Aug-14, Volume: 5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Disease-Free Surviva

2015
Pharmacokinetics and safety of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Asian patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma: a phase 1 study.
    Journal of hematology & oncology, 2015, Sep-04, Volume: 8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Asia; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Female; Glycine; Humans; L

2015
Exposure-safety-efficacy analysis of single-agent ixazomib, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: dose selection for a phase 3 maintenance study.
    Investigational new drugs, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Boron Compounds; Disease Progression; Dose-Res

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
Oral Ixazomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2016, Apr-28, Volume: 374, Issue:17

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2016
A pharmacokinetics and safety phase 1/1b study of oral ixazomib in patients with multiple myeloma and severe renal impairment or end-stage renal disease requiring haemodialysis.
    British journal of haematology, 2016, Volume: 174, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Blood Proteins; Boron Compounds; Drug

2016
Randomized phase 2 trial of ixazomib and dexamethasone in relapsed multiple myeloma not refractory to bortezomib.
    Blood, 2016, 11-17, Volume: 128, Issue:20

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib

2016
Phase 1 study of ixazomib alone or combined with lenalidomide-dexamethasone in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    International journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 105, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Asian People; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone;

2017

Other Studies

79 other studies available for glycine and Multiple Myeloma

ArticleYear
Long-time progression-free survival in relapsed, refractory multiple myeloma with the oral ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone regime
    Orvosi hetilap, 2021, 09-05, Volume: 162, Issue:36

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Lenalidomide; Multiple Myeloma; Progression-Free Su

2021
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone combination in "real-world" clinical practice in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Annals of hematology, 2022, Volume: 101, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cohort Studies

2022
Safety Profile of Ixazomib in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Japan: An All-case Post-marketing Surveillance.
    Internal medicine (Tokyo, Japan), 2022, May-01, Volume: 61, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dex

2022
Ixazomib-based maintenance therapy after bortezomib-based induction in patients with multiple myeloma not undergoing transplantation: A real-world study.
    Cancer medicine, 2022, Volume: 11, Issue:11

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Dexamethasone; Glycine;

2022
[Efficacy of total oral regimens containing ixazomib in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma].
    Zhonghua nei ke za zhi, 2022, Jan-01, Volume: 61, Issue:1

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Mul

2022
Safety and Efficacy of Combination Maintenance Therapy with Ixazomib and Lenalidomide in Patients with Posttransplant Myeloma.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022, 04-01, Volume: 28, Issue:7

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len

2022
Comprehensive Analysis of Ixazomib-Induced Adverse Events Using the Japanese Pharmacovigilance Database.
    Oncology, 2022, Volume: 100, Issue:7

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Japan; Multiple Myeloma; Pharmacovigilance

2022
Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic joint modeling of ixazomib efficacy and safety using data from the pivotal phase III TOURMALINE-MM1 study in multiple myeloma patients.
    CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology, 2022, Volume: 11, Issue:8

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Diarrhea; Exanthema; Glycine; Humans; Multiple

2022
Blocking glycine utilization inhibits multiple myeloma progression by disrupting glutathione balance.
    Nature communications, 2022, 07-11, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Bone Marrow; Bortezomib; Glutathione; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Tumor Microenvironment

2022
An update on the safety of ixazomib for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2022, Volume: 21, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycin

2022
[Analysis of the efficacy and survival of ixazomib-containing regimens in patients with refractory and relapsed multiple myeloma].
    Zhonghua xue ye xue za zhi = Zhonghua xueyexue zazhi, 2022, 08-14, Volume: 43, Issue:8

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len

2022
LINC00461 Knockdown Enhances the Effect of Ixazomib in Multiple Myeloma Cells.
    Current cancer drug targets, 2023, Volume: 23, Issue:8

    Topics: Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Cell Line, Tumor; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma

2023
Ixazomib-induced Sweet's syndrome.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2019, Volume: 60, Issue:14

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Human

2019
Quality of life in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma during ixazomib-thalidomide-dexamethasone induction and ixazomib maintenance therapy and comparison to the general population.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2020, Volume: 61, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Mul

2020
c-MYC expression and maturity phenotypes are associated with outcome benefit from addition of ixazomib to lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma.
    European journal of haematology, 2020, Volume: 105, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Co

2020
Ixazomib-based regimens for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: are real-world data compatible with clinical trial outcomes? A multi-site Israeli registry study.
    Annals of hematology, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocol

2020
Medication use evaluation of the financial and clinical implications of ixazomib compared to bortezomib in the outpatient setting.
    Journal of oncology pharmacy practice : official publication of the International Society of Oncology Pharmacy Practitioners, 2021, Volume: 27, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron

2021
Clinical study on ixazomib in the treatment of multiple myeloma.
    Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences, 2020, Mar-28, Volume: 45, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethason

2020
Efficacy of ixazomib for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A protocol of systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Medicine, 2020, Volume: 99, Issue:20

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Protocols; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Neoplasm Recurrence, Local;

2020
Ixazomib Treatment of IgA Multiple Myeloma With Hyperviscosity Syndrome.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2020, Volume: 20, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Blood Viscosity; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Syndrome; Treatme

2020
Patient Characteristics and Outcomes of Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Patients Treated with Proteasome Inhibitors in Germany.
    Oncology research and treatment, 2020, Volume: 43, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bor

2020
Cystathionine β Synthase/Hydrogen Sulfide Signaling in Multiple Myeloma Regulates Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis.
    Journal of environmental pathology, toxicology and oncology : official organ of the International Society for Environmental Toxicology and Cancer, 2020, Volume: 39, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alkynes; Aminooxyacetic Acid; Apoptosis; Bone Marrow Cells; Case-Control Studies; Cell

2020
[Systemic varicella-zoster infection during ixazomib-containing multiagent chemotherapy for multiple myeloma].
    [Rinsho ketsueki] The Japanese journal of clinical hematology, 2020, Volume: 61, Issue:8

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Chickenpox; Glycine; Herpes Zoster; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Multiple Myeloma; Ne

2020
Feasibility of Long-term Proteasome Inhibition in Multiple Myeloma by in-class Transition From Bortezomib to Ixazomib.
    Clinical lymphoma, myeloma & leukemia, 2020, Volume: 20, Issue:11

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Female; Glycine;

2020
Ixazomib-associated tumor lysis syndrome in multiple myeloma: A case report.
    Medicine, 2020, Nov-06, Volume: 99, Issue:45

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Fatal Outcom

2020
Ixazomib and lenalidomide maintenance therapy in multiple myeloma.
    Annals of hematology, 2021, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Human

2021
Ixazomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone is effective and well tolerated in multiply relapsed (≥2nd relapse) refractory myeloma: a multicenter real world UK experience.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2021, Volume: 62, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len

2021
Ixazomib with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed multiple myeloma: impact of 17p deletion and sensitivity to proteasome inhibitors from a real world data-set.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2021, Volume: 62, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Len

2021
Survival benefit of ixazomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (IRD) over lenalidomide and dexamethasone (Rd) in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma patients in routine clinical practice.
    BMC cancer, 2021, Jan-15, Volume: 21, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols

2021
Outcomes of ixazomib/lenalidomide/dexamethasone for multiple myeloma: A multicenter retrospective analysis.
    European journal of haematology, 2021, Volume: 106, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Co

2021
Oxidatively modified low-density lipoproteins are potential mediators of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.
    International journal of cancer, 2021, 06-15, Volume: 148, Issue:12

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Glycine; Granulocytes; Hum

2021
Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 regulates cancer cell metabolism in multiple myeloma.
    FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology, 2021, Volume: 35, Issue:3

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Glycine; Glycine Dehydrogenase (Decarb

2021
Ixazomib inhibits myeloma cell proliferation by targeting UBE2K.
    Biochemical and biophysical research communications, 2021, 04-16, Volume: 549

    Topics: Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival;

2021
Real-world comparative effectiveness of triplets containing bortezomib (B), carfilzomib (C), daratumumab (D), or ixazomib (I) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the US.
    Annals of hematology, 2021, Volume: 100, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Borte

2021
M3258 Is a Selective Inhibitor of the Immunoproteasome Subunit LMP7 (β5i) Delivering Efficacy in Multiple Myeloma Models.
    Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2021, Volume: 20, Issue:8

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids;

2021
Retrospective study of treatment patterns and outcomes post-lenalidomide for multiple myeloma in Canada.
    European journal of haematology, 2021, Volume: 107, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds

2021
Up-front ixazomib in older patients with myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 07-01, Volume: 137, Issue:26

    Topics: Aged; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma

2021
The activity and safety of novel proteasome inhibitors strategies (single, doublet and triplet) for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.
    Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2018, Volume: 57, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Lactones; Multiple

2018
Therapy sequencing strategies in multiple myeloma: who, what and why?
    Future oncology (London, England), 2018, Volume: 14, Issue:2

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Prot

2018
Spectrum and functional validation of PSMB5 mutations in multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia, 2019, Volume: 33, Issue:2

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Coho

2019
Oral proteasome inhibitor maintenance for multiple myeloma.
    Lancet (London, England), 2019, 01-19, Volume: 393, Issue:10168

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome Inhibitors; Sili

2019
[Ixazomib].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2016, Volume: 74 Suppl 5

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome Inhibitors

2016
Real World Efficacy and Safety Results of Ixazomib Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma: Data Collected from the Hungarian Ixazomib Named Patient Program.
    Pathology oncology research : POR, 2019, Volume: 25, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Drug Resistanc

2019
Real-world treatment patterns, resource use and cost burden of multiple myeloma in Portugal.
    European journal of cancer care, 2019, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Drug Costs; Female; Glycine;

2019
Novel cell line models to study mechanisms and overcoming strategies of proteasome inhibitor resistance in multiple myeloma.
    Biochimica et biophysica acta. Molecular basis of disease, 2019, 06-01, Volume: 1865, Issue:6

    Topics: A549 Cells; Amino Acid Substitution; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line,

2019
Cost-effectiveness analysis on binary/triple therapy on the basis of ixazomib or bortezomib for refractory or relapsed multiple myeloma.
    Leukemia & lymphoma, 2019, Volume: 60, Issue:12

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cost-Benefit Analysis;

2019
[Efficacy and Safety of Ixazomib-Lenalidomide-Dexamethasone Therapy for Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2019, Volume: 46, Issue:6

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Dexamethasone; Glycine; Humans; Jap

2019
Glyphosate induces benign monoclonal gammopathy and promotes multiple myeloma progression in mice.
    Journal of hematology & oncology, 2019, 07-05, Volume: 12, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Disease Progression; Female; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Inb

2019
[Molecular targeting agents for multiple myeloma].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2012, Volume: 70 Suppl 8

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib

2012
Preclinical activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 in Myeloma bone disease.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2014, Mar-15, Volume: 20, Issue:6

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Bone Resorption; Boron Compounds; Cell Line; Disease Models, Animal;

2014
Oral therapy for multiple myeloma: ixazomib arriving soon.
    Blood, 2014, Aug-14, Volume: 124, Issue:7

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Drugs, Investigational; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Multiple Myeloma; Proteasome

2014
Switching from body surface area-based to fixed dosing for the investigational proteasome inhibitor ixazomib: a population pharmacokinetic analysis.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2015, Volume: 79, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Area Under Curve; Body

2015
An oral proteasome inhibitor for multiple myeloma.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2014, Volume: 15, Issue:13

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Male; Mult

2014
Multiple myeloma and glyphosate use: a re-analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) data.
    International journal of environmental research and public health, 2015, Jan-28, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Agricultural Workers' Diseases; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glycine;

2015
The combination of HDAC and aminopeptidase inhibitors is highly synergistic in myeloma and leads to disruption of the NFκB signalling pathway.
    Oncotarget, 2015, Jul-10, Volume: 6, Issue:19

    Topics: Aminopeptidases; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Apoptosis; Azabicyclo Comp

2015
Multiple Myeloma Gets Three New Drugs.
    Cancer discovery, 2016, Volume: 6, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Oral; ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humaniz

2016
FDA approves three different multiple myeloma drugs in one month.
    Nature biotechnology, 2016, Volume: 34, Issue:2

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Boron Compounds; Drug Approval; Drug Indu

2016
Oral proteasome inhibitor with strong preclinical efficacy in myeloma models.
    BMC cancer, 2016, Mar-24, Volume: 16

    Topics: Aged; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell

2016
Ixazomib for multiple myeloma.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2016, Volume: 17, Issue:6

    Topics: Boron Compounds; Clinical Trials as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma

2016
Three new drugs for multiple myeloma.
    The Medical letter on drugs and therapeutics, 2016, May-23, Volume: 58, Issue:1495

    Topics: ADP-ribosyl Cyclase 1; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Age

2016
Multiple myeloma--translation of trial results into reality.
    Lancet (London, England), 2016, Jul-09, Volume: 388, Issue:10040

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; B

2016
Recent Data Supporting Novel Management Strategies for Patients With Multiple Myeloma.
    JAMA oncology, 2016, Oct-01, Volume: 2, Issue:10

    Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Cyclophosph

2016
Ixazomib cardiotoxicity: A possible class effect of proteasome inhibitors.
    American journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 92, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biopsy; Bo

2017
Visualizing the Heterogeneity of Effects in the Analysis of Associations of Multiple Myeloma with Glyphosate Use. Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res.
    International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016, 12-22, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Agriculture; Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Multiple Myeloma

2016
Visualising and Thinking and Interpreting. Response to the Burstyn and De Roos Comments on Sorahan, T. Multiple Myeloma and Glyphosate Use: A Re-Analysis of US Agricultural Health Study (AHS) Data. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2015, 12, 1548-1559.
    International journal of environmental research and public health, 2016, 12-22, Volume: 14, Issue:1

    Topics: Agriculture; Glycine; Glyphosate; Humans; Multiple Myeloma

2016
Ixazomib-induced thrombotic microangiopathy.
    American journal of hematology, 2017, Volume: 92, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Boron Compounds; Female; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Thrombotic Microangiopathies

2017
Potent and Selective KDM5 Inhibitor Stops Cellular Demethylation of H3K4me3 at Transcription Start Sites and Proliferation of MM1S Myeloma Cells.
    Cell chemical biology, 2017, Mar-16, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Proliferation; Cell Survival; Crystallography, X-Ray;

2017
Aminopeptidase inhibition as a targeted treatment strategy in myeloma.
    Molecular cancer therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 8, Issue:4

    Topics: Aminopeptidases; Apoptosis; Biomarkers, Tumor; Bone Marrow Cells; Caspases; Cell Cycle; Cell Prolife

2009
In vitro and in vivo selective antitumor activity of a novel orally bioavailable proteasome inhibitor MLN9708 against multiple myeloma cells.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2011, Aug-15, Volume: 17, Issue:16

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Biological Availability; Blotting,

2011
Drugs: More shots on target.
    Nature, 2011, Dec-14, Volume: 480, Issue:7377

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Boronic Acids; Bortezomib; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Re

2011
Investigational agent MLN9708/2238 targets tumor-suppressor miR33b in MM cells.
    Blood, 2012, Nov-08, Volume: 120, Issue:19

    Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Boron Compounds; Cell Death; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell S

2012
Turnover rate of myeloma proteins in serum and urine determined after intravital labelling with glycine--1--C--14.
    Acta medica Scandinavica, 1961, Volume: 169

    Topics: Blood Proteins; Glycine; Humans; Multiple Myeloma; Myeloma Proteins; Plasma; Plasma Cells

1961
TURNOVER RATE OF PARAPROTEINS IN MYELOMATOSIS. STUDIES ON THE TURNOVER RATE OF SERUM PARAPROTEINS AFTER LABELLING IN VIVO, WITH SPECIAL REFERENCE TO REPEATED TURNOVER-RATE DETERMINATIONS.
    Acta medica Scandinavica, 1964, Volume: 176

    Topics: Blood Proteins; Carbon Isotopes; Glycine; Humans; Immunoelectrophoresis; Melphalan; Multiple Myeloma

1964
Cancer incidence among glyphosate-exposed pesticide applicators in the Agricultural Health Study.
    Environmental health perspectives, 2005, Volume: 113, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Agriculture; Cohort Studies; Female; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; Incidence

2005
Glyphosate results revisited.
    Environmental health perspectives, 2005, Volume: 113, Issue:6

    Topics: Agriculture; Animals; Confounding Factors, Epidemiologic; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Humans; M

2005
Effects of glucose supply on myeloma growth and metabolism in chemostat culture.
    Journal of cellular physiology, 1995, Volume: 162, Issue:2

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Amino Acids; Cell Division; Cell Survival; Culture Media; Glucose; Glutamine

1995
Catalytic cleavage of vasopressin by human Bence Jones proteins at the arginylglycinamide bond.
    Biological chemistry, 1996, Volume: 377, Issue:9

    Topics: Arginine; Bence Jones Protein; Catalysis; Glycine; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hydrolysis; K

1996
Ultracentrifugal studies of the aggregation of human immunoglobulin G by freezing and by heating.
    Acta chemica Scandinavica, 1968, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Protein Electrophoresis; Freezing; gamma-Globulins; Glycine; Hot Temperature; Humans; Multiple

1968
An analysis of the sequences of the variable regions of Bence Jones proteins and myeloma light chains and their implications for antibody complementarity.
    The Journal of experimental medicine, 1970, Aug-01, Volume: 132, Issue:2

    Topics: Alanine; Amino Acid Sequence; Analysis of Variance; Animals; Antibodies; Antibody Specificity; Bence

1970