Page last updated: 2024-10-18

glycine and Bile Duct Cancer

glycine has been researched along with Bile Duct Cancer in 25 studies

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"On August 25, 2021, the FDA approved ivosidenib for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) as detected by an FDA-approved test with disease progression after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease."9.51FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation. ( Beaver, JA; Casak, SJ; Charlab, R; Chow, ECY; Fashoyin-Aje, LA; Fesenko, N; Kluetz, PG; Lemery, SJ; Liu, J; Pazdur, R; Pierce, WF; Pradhan, S; Ren, Y; Shen, YL; Xiong, Y; Xu, Y; Zirklelbach, JF, 2022)
"To report the final overall survival (OS) results from the ClarIDHy trial, which aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1-vs placebo for patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation."9.41Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Adeva, J; Aguado-Fraile, E; Borad, MJ; Bridgewater, JA; Catenacci, DVT; Chamberlain, CX; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; El-Khoueiry, AB; Gliser, C; Goyal, L; Harris, WP; Javle, MM; Kelley, RK; Liu, H; Lowery, MA; Lubner, SJ; Macarulla, T; Murphy, AG; Oh, DY; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Valle, JW; Whisenant, JR; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2021)
"Between March 14, 2014 and May 12, 2017, 73 patients with mIDH1-cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled and received ivosidenib."9.30Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Agresta, SV; Aguado-Fraile, E; Azad, NS; Beeram, M; Burris, HA; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; Fan, B; Gliser, C; Gore, L; Goyal, L; Hollebecque, A; Janku, F; Jiang, L; Lowery, MA; Maher, EA; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Trent, JC; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2019)
"The results of the phase III ClarIDHy trial have led to US FDA approval of ivosidenib as a therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harboring isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations."8.12Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis. ( Aldrighetti, L; Antonuzzo, L; Burgio, V; Casadei-Gardini, A; Cascinu, S; De Cobelli, F; Della Corte, A; Lavacchi, D; Oneda, E; Pedica, F; Persano, M; Personeni, N; Ratti, F; Rimassa, L; Rimini, M; Scartozzi, M, 2022)
"Ivosidenib extends overall survival in patients with previously treated, advanced cholangiocarcinoma whose disease harbors IDH1 mutations."8.02Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma. ( , 2021)
" A 66-year-old male treated with combined paclitaxel (PTX) and S-1 suffered from ARDS following neutropenia."7.74[Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma]. ( Hanada, N; Hori, K; Kusano, S; Momi, H, 2007)
"On August 25, 2021, the FDA approved ivosidenib for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) as detected by an FDA-approved test with disease progression after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease."5.51FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation. ( Beaver, JA; Casak, SJ; Charlab, R; Chow, ECY; Fashoyin-Aje, LA; Fesenko, N; Kluetz, PG; Lemery, SJ; Liu, J; Pazdur, R; Pierce, WF; Pradhan, S; Ren, Y; Shen, YL; Xiong, Y; Xu, Y; Zirklelbach, JF, 2022)
"To report the final overall survival (OS) results from the ClarIDHy trial, which aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1-vs placebo for patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation."5.41Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Adeva, J; Aguado-Fraile, E; Borad, MJ; Bridgewater, JA; Catenacci, DVT; Chamberlain, CX; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; El-Khoueiry, AB; Gliser, C; Goyal, L; Harris, WP; Javle, MM; Kelley, RK; Liu, H; Lowery, MA; Lubner, SJ; Macarulla, T; Murphy, AG; Oh, DY; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Valle, JW; Whisenant, JR; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2021)
"Between March 14, 2014 and May 12, 2017, 73 patients with mIDH1-cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled and received ivosidenib."5.30Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Agresta, SV; Aguado-Fraile, E; Azad, NS; Beeram, M; Burris, HA; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; Fan, B; Gliser, C; Gore, L; Goyal, L; Hollebecque, A; Janku, F; Jiang, L; Lowery, MA; Maher, EA; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Trent, JC; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2019)
"The results of the phase III ClarIDHy trial have led to US FDA approval of ivosidenib as a therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harboring isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations."4.12Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis. ( Aldrighetti, L; Antonuzzo, L; Burgio, V; Casadei-Gardini, A; Cascinu, S; De Cobelli, F; Della Corte, A; Lavacchi, D; Oneda, E; Pedica, F; Persano, M; Personeni, N; Ratti, F; Rimassa, L; Rimini, M; Scartozzi, M, 2022)
"Ivosidenib extends overall survival in patients with previously treated, advanced cholangiocarcinoma whose disease harbors IDH1 mutations."4.02Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma. ( , 2021)
" A 66-year-old male treated with combined paclitaxel (PTX) and S-1 suffered from ARDS following neutropenia."3.74[Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma]. ( Hanada, N; Hori, K; Kusano, S; Momi, H, 2007)
"Cholangiocarcinoma is the first most common cancer of the biliary tract."1.62In Vitro Evaluation of Rigosertib Antitumoral and Radiosensitizing Effects against Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells. ( Cavaletti, G; Celio, L; Damian, S; Malacrida, A; Mazzaferro, V; Miloso, M; Rigolio, R, 2021)
"Fifty-four patients were diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (n=9), hilar tumours (n=20) and 25 patients with non-parenchymal tumours including colorectal metastasis (n=15) and miscellaneous tumours (n=10)."1.32Preoperative assessment of liver function: a comparison of 99mTc-Mebrofenin scintigraphy with indocyanine green clearance test. ( Bennink, RJ; Dinant, S; Erdogan, D; Gouma, DJ; Heijnen, BH; Kok, M; Straatsburg, IH; van Gulik, TM, 2004)

Research

Studies (25)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (4.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's3 (12.00)29.6817
2010's6 (24.00)24.3611
2020's15 (60.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Zhu, AX4
Macarulla, T2
Javle, MM2
Kelley, RK2
Lubner, SJ2
Adeva, J2
Cleary, JM3
Catenacci, DVT1
Borad, MJ2
Bridgewater, JA1
Harris, WP2
Murphy, AG2
Oh, DY2
Whisenant, JR1
Lowery, MA4
Goyal, L4
Shroff, RT3
El-Khoueiry, AB2
Chamberlain, CX2
Aguado-Fraile, E3
Choe, S3
Wu, B4
Liu, H1
Gliser, C4
Pandya, SS5
Valle, JW4
Abou-Alfa, GK4
Casak, SJ1
Pradhan, S1
Fashoyin-Aje, LA1
Ren, Y1
Shen, YL1
Xu, Y1
Chow, ECY1
Xiong, Y1
Zirklelbach, JF1
Liu, J1
Charlab, R1
Pierce, WF1
Fesenko, N1
Beaver, JA1
Pazdur, R1
Kluetz, PG1
Lemery, SJ1
Lavacchi, D2
Caliman, E1
Rossi, G1
Buttitta, E1
Botteri, C1
Fancelli, S1
Pellegrini, E1
Roviello, G1
Pillozzi, S1
Antonuzzo, L2
Colyn, L1
Alvarez-Sola, G1
Latasa, MU1
Uriarte, I1
Herranz, JM1
Arechederra, M1
Vlachogiannis, G1
Rae, C1
Pineda-Lucena, A1
Casadei-Gardini, A2
Pedica, F2
Aldrighetti, L2
López-López, A1
López-Gonzálvez, A1
Barbas, C1
Ciordia, S1
Van Liempd, SM1
Falcón-Pérez, JM1
Urman, J1
Sangro, B1
Vicent, S1
Iraburu, MJ1
Prosper, F1
Nelson, LJ1
Banales, JM1
Martinez-Chantar, ML1
Marin, JJG1
Braconi, C1
Trautwein, C1
Corrales, FJ1
Cubero, FJ1
Berasain, C1
Fernandez-Barrena, MG1
Avila, MA1
Rimini, M1
Burgio, V1
Rimassa, L1
Oneda, E1
Personeni, N1
Ratti, F1
Della Corte, A1
Persano, M1
De Cobelli, F1
Scartozzi, M1
Cascinu, S1
de la Fouchardiere, C1
Catenacci, DV1
Bridgewater, J1
Whisenant, J1
Fan, B2
Jiang, L3
Gervaso, L1
Pellicori, S1
Fazio, N1
Angelakas, A1
Lamarca, A1
Hubner, RA1
McNamara, MG1
Tassinari, A1
Ishii, Y1
Sigel, C1
Bardeesy, N1
Deshpande, V1
Rizzo, A1
Ricci, AD1
Brandi, G1
Corrigan, L1
Lowery, M1
Malacrida, A1
Rigolio, R1
Celio, L1
Damian, S1
Cavaletti, G1
Mazzaferro, V1
Miloso, M1
Olthof, PB1
Coelen, RJS1
Bennink, RJ3
Heger, M1
Lam, MF1
Besselink, MG1
Busch, OR1
van Lienden, KP1
van Gulik, TM3
De Bari, B1
Breuneval, T1
Zeverino, M1
Godin, S1
Deantonio, L1
Geldhof, C1
Bourhis, J1
Schaefer, N1
Moeckli, R1
Prior, J1
Ozsahin, M1
Burris, HA1
Janku, F1
Azad, NS1
Maher, EA1
Gore, L1
Hollebecque, A1
Beeram, M1
Trent, JC1
Agresta, SV1
Guiu, B1
Quenet, F1
Escal, L1
Bibeau, F1
Piron, L1
Rouanet, P1
Fabre, JM1
Jacquet, E1
Denys, A1
Kotzki, PO1
Verzilli, D1
Deshayes, E1
Sharif, AW1
Williams, HR1
Lampejo, T1
Khan, SA1
Bansi, DS1
Westaby, D1
Thillainayagam, AV1
Thomas, HC1
Cox, IJ1
Taylor-Robinson, SD1
Erdogan, D2
Heijnen, BH2
Kok, M1
Dinant, S2
Straatsburg, IH2
Gouma, DJ1
van Vliet, AK1
Hanada, N1
Kusano, S1
Hori, K1
Momi, H1
Hino, M1
Nagatsu, T1
Kakumu, S1
Okuyama, S1
Yoshii, Y1
Nagatsu, I1

Clinical Trials (4)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AG-120 in Previously-treated Subjects With Nonresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With an IDH1 Mutation[NCT02989857]Phase 3187 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-02-20Completed
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Clinical Activity Study of Orally Administered AG-120 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors, Including Glioma, With an IDH1 Mutation[NCT02073994]Phase 1170 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2014-03-01Active, not recruiting
Is It Possible To Predict PHLF? - Retrospective Analysis of Gadoxetate MRI Prior To Major Liver Resection[NCT04692259]200 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2020-12-29Recruiting
HepaRAS TRIAL: CHANGES IN HEPATECTOMY RISK ASSESSMENT WHEN INCORPORATING MEBROFENIN HIDA FOR FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF THE LIVER REMNANT: A PILOT STUDY[NCT05280990]60 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-15Not yet recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Accumulation Ratio Based on AUC0-4 (Racc AUC0-4)

Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1201.6881

Accumulation Ratio Based on Cmax (Racc Cmax)

Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionratio (Mean)
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1201.2369

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 24 Hours (AUC0-24)

Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose of Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-12091219.4

Change From Baseline in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D-5L VAS) Score

"The EQ visual analogue scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled The best health you can imagine and The worst health you can imagine. Responses are marked on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life (i.e., better outcome)." (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
AG-1204.6
Placebo-2.8

DOR as Assessed by the IRC Per RECIST v1.1

DOR was defined as the time in months from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the IRC per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Participants with response and without progression were censored at the last observation. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of first confirmed CR or PR to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-120NA

Duration of Response (DOR) as Assessed by the Investigator

DOR was defined as the time in months from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the Investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Participants with response and without progression were censored at the last observation. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of first confirmed CR or PR to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-120NA
PlaceboNA

Objective Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the Investigator RECIST Version 1.1

ORR as assessed by the investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AG-1203.2
Placebo1.6

ORR as Assessed by the IRC Per RECIST v1.1

ORR as assessed by the IRC was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AG-1202.4
Placebo0

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival was defined as the time in months from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the final collection were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the final collection date, whichever is earlier. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-12010.3
Placebo7.5

Percentage of Participants Who Required At Least One Concomitant Medications During the Treatment

Concomitant medications were medications that were ongoing or initiated after the first dose of the study drug but before the last dose plus 28 days. Percentage of participants who required at least one concomitant medications during the study along with their prescribed study drug (AG-120 or placebo) were reported. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 4 Years)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AG-12099.2
Placebo98.3
After Crossover to AG-12095.3

PFS as Determined by Investigator

PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of the diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. No progression or death by data cutoff date was censored at the last adequate assessment date. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-1202.7
Placebo1.4

Plasma 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) Levels of AG-120: %BRtrough

%BRtrough is the percent inhibition for Rtrough. Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-12073.726

Plasma 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) Levels of AG-120: Rtrough

Rtrough is the observed response value at the end of a dosing interval. Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-12097.66

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Determined by the Independent Radiology Committee (IRC)

PFS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as assessed by the IRC using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)20 percent (%) increase in sum of the diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-1202.7
Placebo1.4

Time to Response (TTR) as Assessed by the Investigator

TTR was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented CR or PR for responders, as assessed by the Investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to the date of first documented CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-120NA
PlaceboNA

TTR as Assessed by the IRC Per RECIST v1.1

TTR was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented CR or PR for responders, as assessed by the IRC per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to the date of first documented CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)

Interventionmonths (Median)
AG-120NA

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve From Time Zero to 4 Hours (AUC0-4)

Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose of Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-12010972.216651.7

Change From Baseline in Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) Based on European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire- Core 30 Subscales Scores

EORTC-QLQ-C30 is the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire. For EORTC QLQ-C30, subscales of physical functioning, pain, and appetite loss were assessed. These had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much). For functional scales, higher scores=better QOL (positive change from Baseline=improvement). For symptom scales, lower scores=better QOL (negative change from Baseline=improvement). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores ranged from 0 to 100. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1: Physical FunctioningCycle 2 Day 1: PainCycle 2 Day 1: Appetite LossCycle 3 Day 1: Physical FunctioningCycle 3 Day 1: PainCycle 3 Day 1: Appetite Loss
AG-120-2.42.27.9-0.2-1.2-0.5
Placebo-13.312.54.3-12.6-5.33.2

Change From Baseline in HRQOL Based on: Quality of Life Questionnaire - Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Module (QLQ-BIL21)

For HRQOL based on QLQ-BIL21, subscales of eating symptoms and pain symptoms were assessed. Each item is a 4-point Likert scale. There are 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much). Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For symptom scales, lower scores=better QOL (negative change from Baseline=improvement). (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
Cycle 2 Day 1: PainCycle 2 Day 1: Appetite LossCycle 3 Day 1: PainCycle 3 Day 1: Appetite Loss
AG-1205.14.32.3-2.0
Placebo10.13.6-2.14.1

Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of AG-120

Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1204424.05050.5

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Laboratory Abnormalities Reported as Grade 3 or Higher Adverse Events

The laboratory parameters evaluated by the investigator included hematology and chemistry. Laboratory abnormalities reported in this endpoint are Grade 3 or higher adverse events. Grading categories were determined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.03. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug up to end of treatment visit for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AnaemiaPlatelet Count DecreasedNeutrophil Count DecreasedWhite Blood Cell Count DecreasedLymphocyte Count DecreasedThrombocytopeniaBlood Loss AnaemiaBlood Bilirubin IncreasedHyponatraemiaAspartate Aminotransferase IncreasedHypophosphataemiaHyperbilirubinaemiaHyperkalaemiaBlood Alkaline Phosphatase IncreasedAlanine Aminotransferase IncreasedHypoalbuminaemiaGamma-glutamyltransferase IncreasedHypercalcaemiaHyperuricaemiaHypokalaemiaTransaminases IncreasedBlood Uric Acid Increased
After Crossover to AG-1209.32.30.00.00.00.00.07.02.34.74.70.02.30.02.30.00.00.00.02.30.00.0
AG-1207.32.41.61.60.80.80.85.75.74.93.33.32.42.41.61.60.80.80.80.80.80.0
Placebo0.00.00.00.03.40.00.01.710.21.75.10.03.45.10.01.71.71.70.01.70.01.7

Percentage of Participants With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Changes Reported as Adverse Events

(NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Pre-dose C1D1, C2D1; Post-dose C1D1, C1D15, C2D1 and Day 1 of C3D1 and all cycles thereafter up to last dose plus 28 days (Up to approximately 4 years)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Electrocardiogram QT ProlongedElectrocardiogram Abnormal
After Crossover to AG-1202.30.0
AG-1209.80.8
Placebo3.40.0

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in participants, whether or not considered drug related. An AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious (an SAE) if it is fatal, life-threatening, causes in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother or father exposed to study treatment or is an important medical event. Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
AEsSAEs
After Crossover to AG-12095.327.9
AG-12097.635.0
Placebo96.623.7

Percentage of Participants With Change Based on HRQOL: Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C)

The PGI-C is a self-rated evaluative instrument for assessment across 3 domains (physical function, appetite loss, and pain). The PGI-C is measured using a 7-point Likert scale, with 6= very much better, 5= moderately better, 4= a little better, 3= no change, 2= a little worse, 1= moderately worse, and 0= very much worse. A lower score indicates a worse outcome. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No ChangePhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little BetterPhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately BetterPhysical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much BetterPhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little WorsePhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No ChangePhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little BetterPhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately BetterPhysical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No ChangeAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little WorseAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No ChangeAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately BetterAppetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much BetterPain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much WorsePain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately WorsePain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little WorsePain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No ChangePain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little BetterPain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately BetterPain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much BetterPain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much WorsePain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately WorsePain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little WorsePain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No ChangePain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little BetterPain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately BetterPain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Better
AG-1201.54.522.438.822.49.01.52.05.93.941.229.415.72.01.54.520.950.713.47.51.50.05.95.964.711.87.83.90.09.09.064.27.510.40.00.03.911.860.87.811.83.9
Placebo0.013.69.127.336.49.14.50.00.08.358.316.716.70.00.04.518.245.513.69.19.10.08.30.050.025.00.016.70.013.69.154.518.24.50.00.00.08.366.78.38.38.3

Percentage of Participants With Clinically Significant Grade 3 or Higher Vital Signs AEs

Clinically significant vital signs were recorded as adverse events; there were some vital signs reported as Grade 3 or higher adverse events. Grading categories were determined by NCI CTCAE, version 4.03. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug up to end of treatment visit for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)

,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
PyrexiaWeight DecreasedHypertensionHypotension
After Crossover to AG-1202.30.07.02.3
AG-1200.80.81.61.6
Placebo0.01.71.71.7

Percentage of Participants With Each EuroQol 5 Dimensions 5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Dimension Response

The EQ-5D-5L assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Mobility: No Problems WalkingMobility: Slight Problems WalkingMobility: Moderate Problems WalkingMobility: Severe Problems WalkingMobility: Unable to WalkSelf-Care: No Problems Washing or DressingSelf-Care: Slight Problems Washing or DressingSelf-Care: Moderate Problems Washing or DressingSelf-Care: Severe Problems Washing or DressingUsual Activities: No Problems Doing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Slight Problems Doing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Moderate Problems Doing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Severe Problems Doing Usual ActivitiesUsual Activities: Unable to do Usual ActivitiesPain/Discomfort: No Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Slight Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Moderate Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Severe Pain or DiscomfortPain/Discomfort: Extreme Pain or DiscomfortAnxiety/Depression: Not Anxious or DepressedAnxiety/Depression: Slightly Anxious or DepressedAnxiety/Depression: Moderately Anxious or DepressedAnxiety/Depression: Severely Anxious or Depressed
AG-12052.028.016.04.00.088.08.02.02.042.034.016.08.00.040.042.010.06.02.050.044.06.00.0
Placebo41.725.033.30.00.083.316.70.00.033.341.725.00.00.041.733.325.00.00.033.333.325.08.3

Percentage of Participants With Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status

The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score classified participants according to their functional impairment, with scores ranging from 0 to 4. ECOG PS: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. A higher score means a worse functional status. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Baseline

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
01234
AG-12039.759.50.00.80.0
Placebo31.167.21.60.00.0

Percentage of Participants With Severity Based on HRQOL: Patient Global Impression of Severity (PGI-S)

The anchor-based questionnaire PGI-S contains the following 3 items (the severity of the physical functioning decline over the past week, the severity of the appetite decrease over the past week, and the severity of the pain over the past week). The PGI-S was measured using the possible outcomes none, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: NonePhysical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: MildPhysical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: ModeratePhysical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: SeverePhysical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very SeverePhysical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: NonePhysical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: MildPhysical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: ModeratePhysical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: SeverePhysical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: very SevereAppetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: NoneAppetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: MildAppetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: ModerateAppetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: SevereAppetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very SevereAppetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: NoneAppetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: MildAppetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: ModerateAppetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: SevereAppetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very SeverePain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: NonePain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: MildPain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: ModeratePain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: SeverePain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very SeverePain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: NonePain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: MildPain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: ModeratePain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: SeverePain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Severe
AG-12055.223.916.43.01.570.611.815.72.00.053.732.810.41.51.570.615.77.85.90.032.838.823.94.50.039.235.317.67.80.0
Placebo31.827.331.89.10.075.016.78.30.00.045.513.636.44.50.058.325.016.70.00.031.813.640.99.14.533.325.041.70.00.0

Plasma 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) Levels of AG-120: %BAUEC0-4

%BAUEC0-4 is the percent inhibition for AUEC0-4. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-12020.2209074.9750

Plasma 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) Levels of AG-120: AUEC0-4

AUEC0-4 is the area of the response curve from time point zero (predose) up to 4 hr postdose. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionh*ng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1203334.3368.4

Plasma 2-hydroxyglutarate (2-HG) Levels of AG-120: B (Baseline Effect Value)

B is the Baseline Effect Value. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1201107.70795.09

Time to Reach Maximal Plasma Concentration (Tmax) of AG-120

Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)

Interventionhours (h) (Median)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 2 Day 1
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-1202.632.07

Reviews

4 reviews available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer

ArticleYear
Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical evaluation and future directions.
    Pharmacology & therapeutics, 2022, Volume: 237

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; H

2022
Ivosidenib: an investigational drug for the treatment of biliary tract cancers.
    Expert opinion on investigational drugs, 2021, Volume: 30, Issue:4

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Drugs, Inve

2021
IDH inhibitors in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Another arrow in the quiver?
    Cancer treatment and research communications, 2021, Volume: 27

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangi

2021
Ivosidenib for the treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
    Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology, 2021, Volume: 15, Issue:5

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrog

2021

Trials

5 trials available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer

ArticleYear
Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial.
    JAMA oncology, 2021, Nov-01, Volume: 7, Issue:11

    Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahe

2021
FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation.
    Clinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research, 2022, 07-01, Volume: 28, Issue:13

    Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Asthenia; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma;

2022
Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dise

2020
Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dose

2019
Preoperative assessment of postoperative remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy.
    Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2004, Volume: 45, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Female; Glycine; Humans; Imino Acids; Liver Fun

2004

Other Studies

16 other studies available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer

ArticleYear
Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma.
    Cancer discovery, 2021, 12-01, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd

2021
New molecular mechanisms in cholangiocarcinoma: signals triggering interleukin-6 production in tumor cells and KRAS co-opted epigenetic mediators driving metabolic reprogramming.
    Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR, 2022, May-26, Volume: 41, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Arachnodactyly; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Carcinogenesis; Cholangiocar

2022
Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis.
    Targeted oncology, 2022, Volume: 17, Issue:5

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd

2022
Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum

2020
Ivosidenib for advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:8

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum

2020
Ivosidenib for advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma - Authors' reply.
    The Lancet. Oncology, 2020, Volume: 21, Issue:8

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum

2020
Molecular and morphological changes induced by ivosidenib correlate with efficacy in mutant-
    Future oncology (London, England), 2021, Volume: 17, Issue:16

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cell Differentiation; Cholangiocarcinoma; Clinical Trial

2021
In Vitro Evaluation of Rigosertib Antitumoral and Radiosensitizing Effects against Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.
    International journal of molecular sciences, 2021, Jul-30, Volume: 22, Issue:15

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Autophagy; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement;

2021
    HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aniline Compounds; Area Under Curve; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Female; Glycine; Hepatectomy; Humans

2017
Hepatobiliary scintigraphy allows the evaluation of short-term functional toxicity of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results of a pilot study.
    PloS one, 2018, Volume: 13, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dose Fractionat

2018
Targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma.
    The lancet. Gastroenterology & hepatology, 2019, Volume: 4, Issue:9

    Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd

2019
Extended liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy induces marked and very rapid increase in future liver remnant function.
    European radiology, 2017, Volume: 27, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Gallbladder Neoplas

2017
Metabolic profiling of bile in cholangiocarcinoma using in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
    HPB : the official journal of the International Hepato Pancreato Biliary Association, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Bile; Bile Acids and Salts; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, In

2010
Preoperative assessment of liver function: a comparison of 99mTc-Mebrofenin scintigraphy with indocyanine green clearance test.
    Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver, 2004, Volume: 24, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; F

2004
[Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma].
    Gan to kagaku ryoho. Cancer & chemotherapy, 2007, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic;

2007
Glycylprolyl beta-naphthylamidase activity in human serum.
    Clinica chimica acta; international journal of clinical chemistry, 1975, Jul-09, Volume: 62, Issue:1

    Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferas

1975