glycine has been researched along with Bile Duct Cancer in 25 studies
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"On August 25, 2021, the FDA approved ivosidenib for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) as detected by an FDA-approved test with disease progression after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease." | 9.51 | FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation. ( Beaver, JA; Casak, SJ; Charlab, R; Chow, ECY; Fashoyin-Aje, LA; Fesenko, N; Kluetz, PG; Lemery, SJ; Liu, J; Pazdur, R; Pierce, WF; Pradhan, S; Ren, Y; Shen, YL; Xiong, Y; Xu, Y; Zirklelbach, JF, 2022) |
"To report the final overall survival (OS) results from the ClarIDHy trial, which aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1-vs placebo for patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation." | 9.41 | Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Adeva, J; Aguado-Fraile, E; Borad, MJ; Bridgewater, JA; Catenacci, DVT; Chamberlain, CX; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; El-Khoueiry, AB; Gliser, C; Goyal, L; Harris, WP; Javle, MM; Kelley, RK; Liu, H; Lowery, MA; Lubner, SJ; Macarulla, T; Murphy, AG; Oh, DY; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Valle, JW; Whisenant, JR; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2021) |
"Between March 14, 2014 and May 12, 2017, 73 patients with mIDH1-cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled and received ivosidenib." | 9.30 | Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Agresta, SV; Aguado-Fraile, E; Azad, NS; Beeram, M; Burris, HA; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; Fan, B; Gliser, C; Gore, L; Goyal, L; Hollebecque, A; Janku, F; Jiang, L; Lowery, MA; Maher, EA; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Trent, JC; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2019) |
"The results of the phase III ClarIDHy trial have led to US FDA approval of ivosidenib as a therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harboring isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations." | 8.12 | Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis. ( Aldrighetti, L; Antonuzzo, L; Burgio, V; Casadei-Gardini, A; Cascinu, S; De Cobelli, F; Della Corte, A; Lavacchi, D; Oneda, E; Pedica, F; Persano, M; Personeni, N; Ratti, F; Rimassa, L; Rimini, M; Scartozzi, M, 2022) |
"Ivosidenib extends overall survival in patients with previously treated, advanced cholangiocarcinoma whose disease harbors IDH1 mutations." | 8.02 | Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma. ( , 2021) |
" A 66-year-old male treated with combined paclitaxel (PTX) and S-1 suffered from ARDS following neutropenia." | 7.74 | [Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma]. ( Hanada, N; Hori, K; Kusano, S; Momi, H, 2007) |
"On August 25, 2021, the FDA approved ivosidenib for the treatment of adult patients with unresectable locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutated cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) as detected by an FDA-approved test with disease progression after 1 to 2 prior lines of systemic therapy for advanced disease." | 5.51 | FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation. ( Beaver, JA; Casak, SJ; Charlab, R; Chow, ECY; Fashoyin-Aje, LA; Fesenko, N; Kluetz, PG; Lemery, SJ; Liu, J; Pazdur, R; Pierce, WF; Pradhan, S; Ren, Y; Shen, YL; Xiong, Y; Xu, Y; Zirklelbach, JF, 2022) |
"To report the final overall survival (OS) results from the ClarIDHy trial, which aimed to demonstrate the efficacy of ivosidenib (AG-120)-a first-in-class, oral, small-molecule inhibitor of mutant IDH1-vs placebo for patients with unresectable or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with IDH1 mutation." | 5.41 | Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Adeva, J; Aguado-Fraile, E; Borad, MJ; Bridgewater, JA; Catenacci, DVT; Chamberlain, CX; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; El-Khoueiry, AB; Gliser, C; Goyal, L; Harris, WP; Javle, MM; Kelley, RK; Liu, H; Lowery, MA; Lubner, SJ; Macarulla, T; Murphy, AG; Oh, DY; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Valle, JW; Whisenant, JR; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2021) |
"Between March 14, 2014 and May 12, 2017, 73 patients with mIDH1-cholangiocarcinoma were enrolled and received ivosidenib." | 5.30 | Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study. ( Abou-Alfa, GK; Agresta, SV; Aguado-Fraile, E; Azad, NS; Beeram, M; Burris, HA; Choe, S; Cleary, JM; Fan, B; Gliser, C; Gore, L; Goyal, L; Hollebecque, A; Janku, F; Jiang, L; Lowery, MA; Maher, EA; Pandya, SS; Shroff, RT; Trent, JC; Wu, B; Zhu, AX, 2019) |
"The results of the phase III ClarIDHy trial have led to US FDA approval of ivosidenib as a therapeutic option for patients with locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harboring isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations." | 4.12 | Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis. ( Aldrighetti, L; Antonuzzo, L; Burgio, V; Casadei-Gardini, A; Cascinu, S; De Cobelli, F; Della Corte, A; Lavacchi, D; Oneda, E; Pedica, F; Persano, M; Personeni, N; Ratti, F; Rimassa, L; Rimini, M; Scartozzi, M, 2022) |
"Ivosidenib extends overall survival in patients with previously treated, advanced cholangiocarcinoma whose disease harbors IDH1 mutations." | 4.02 | Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma. ( , 2021) |
" A 66-year-old male treated with combined paclitaxel (PTX) and S-1 suffered from ARDS following neutropenia." | 3.74 | [Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma]. ( Hanada, N; Hori, K; Kusano, S; Momi, H, 2007) |
"Cholangiocarcinoma is the first most common cancer of the biliary tract." | 1.62 | In Vitro Evaluation of Rigosertib Antitumoral and Radiosensitizing Effects against Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells. ( Cavaletti, G; Celio, L; Damian, S; Malacrida, A; Mazzaferro, V; Miloso, M; Rigolio, R, 2021) |
"Fifty-four patients were diagnosed as hepatocellular carcinoma (n=9), hilar tumours (n=20) and 25 patients with non-parenchymal tumours including colorectal metastasis (n=15) and miscellaneous tumours (n=10)." | 1.32 | Preoperative assessment of liver function: a comparison of 99mTc-Mebrofenin scintigraphy with indocyanine green clearance test. ( Bennink, RJ; Dinant, S; Erdogan, D; Gouma, DJ; Heijnen, BH; Kok, M; Straatsburg, IH; van Gulik, TM, 2004) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 1 (4.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 3 (12.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 6 (24.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 15 (60.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Zhu, AX | 4 |
Macarulla, T | 2 |
Javle, MM | 2 |
Kelley, RK | 2 |
Lubner, SJ | 2 |
Adeva, J | 2 |
Cleary, JM | 3 |
Catenacci, DVT | 1 |
Borad, MJ | 2 |
Bridgewater, JA | 1 |
Harris, WP | 2 |
Murphy, AG | 2 |
Oh, DY | 2 |
Whisenant, JR | 1 |
Lowery, MA | 4 |
Goyal, L | 4 |
Shroff, RT | 3 |
El-Khoueiry, AB | 2 |
Chamberlain, CX | 2 |
Aguado-Fraile, E | 3 |
Choe, S | 3 |
Wu, B | 4 |
Liu, H | 1 |
Gliser, C | 4 |
Pandya, SS | 5 |
Valle, JW | 4 |
Abou-Alfa, GK | 4 |
Casak, SJ | 1 |
Pradhan, S | 1 |
Fashoyin-Aje, LA | 1 |
Ren, Y | 1 |
Shen, YL | 1 |
Xu, Y | 1 |
Chow, ECY | 1 |
Xiong, Y | 1 |
Zirklelbach, JF | 1 |
Liu, J | 1 |
Charlab, R | 1 |
Pierce, WF | 1 |
Fesenko, N | 1 |
Beaver, JA | 1 |
Pazdur, R | 1 |
Kluetz, PG | 1 |
Lemery, SJ | 1 |
Lavacchi, D | 2 |
Caliman, E | 1 |
Rossi, G | 1 |
Buttitta, E | 1 |
Botteri, C | 1 |
Fancelli, S | 1 |
Pellegrini, E | 1 |
Roviello, G | 1 |
Pillozzi, S | 1 |
Antonuzzo, L | 2 |
Colyn, L | 1 |
Alvarez-Sola, G | 1 |
Latasa, MU | 1 |
Uriarte, I | 1 |
Herranz, JM | 1 |
Arechederra, M | 1 |
Vlachogiannis, G | 1 |
Rae, C | 1 |
Pineda-Lucena, A | 1 |
Casadei-Gardini, A | 2 |
Pedica, F | 2 |
Aldrighetti, L | 2 |
López-López, A | 1 |
López-Gonzálvez, A | 1 |
Barbas, C | 1 |
Ciordia, S | 1 |
Van Liempd, SM | 1 |
Falcón-Pérez, JM | 1 |
Urman, J | 1 |
Sangro, B | 1 |
Vicent, S | 1 |
Iraburu, MJ | 1 |
Prosper, F | 1 |
Nelson, LJ | 1 |
Banales, JM | 1 |
Martinez-Chantar, ML | 1 |
Marin, JJG | 1 |
Braconi, C | 1 |
Trautwein, C | 1 |
Corrales, FJ | 1 |
Cubero, FJ | 1 |
Berasain, C | 1 |
Fernandez-Barrena, MG | 1 |
Avila, MA | 1 |
Rimini, M | 1 |
Burgio, V | 1 |
Rimassa, L | 1 |
Oneda, E | 1 |
Personeni, N | 1 |
Ratti, F | 1 |
Della Corte, A | 1 |
Persano, M | 1 |
De Cobelli, F | 1 |
Scartozzi, M | 1 |
Cascinu, S | 1 |
de la Fouchardiere, C | 1 |
Catenacci, DV | 1 |
Bridgewater, J | 1 |
Whisenant, J | 1 |
Fan, B | 2 |
Jiang, L | 3 |
Gervaso, L | 1 |
Pellicori, S | 1 |
Fazio, N | 1 |
Angelakas, A | 1 |
Lamarca, A | 1 |
Hubner, RA | 1 |
McNamara, MG | 1 |
Tassinari, A | 1 |
Ishii, Y | 1 |
Sigel, C | 1 |
Bardeesy, N | 1 |
Deshpande, V | 1 |
Rizzo, A | 1 |
Ricci, AD | 1 |
Brandi, G | 1 |
Corrigan, L | 1 |
Lowery, M | 1 |
Malacrida, A | 1 |
Rigolio, R | 1 |
Celio, L | 1 |
Damian, S | 1 |
Cavaletti, G | 1 |
Mazzaferro, V | 1 |
Miloso, M | 1 |
Olthof, PB | 1 |
Coelen, RJS | 1 |
Bennink, RJ | 3 |
Heger, M | 1 |
Lam, MF | 1 |
Besselink, MG | 1 |
Busch, OR | 1 |
van Lienden, KP | 1 |
van Gulik, TM | 3 |
De Bari, B | 1 |
Breuneval, T | 1 |
Zeverino, M | 1 |
Godin, S | 1 |
Deantonio, L | 1 |
Geldhof, C | 1 |
Bourhis, J | 1 |
Schaefer, N | 1 |
Moeckli, R | 1 |
Prior, J | 1 |
Ozsahin, M | 1 |
Burris, HA | 1 |
Janku, F | 1 |
Azad, NS | 1 |
Maher, EA | 1 |
Gore, L | 1 |
Hollebecque, A | 1 |
Beeram, M | 1 |
Trent, JC | 1 |
Agresta, SV | 1 |
Guiu, B | 1 |
Quenet, F | 1 |
Escal, L | 1 |
Bibeau, F | 1 |
Piron, L | 1 |
Rouanet, P | 1 |
Fabre, JM | 1 |
Jacquet, E | 1 |
Denys, A | 1 |
Kotzki, PO | 1 |
Verzilli, D | 1 |
Deshayes, E | 1 |
Sharif, AW | 1 |
Williams, HR | 1 |
Lampejo, T | 1 |
Khan, SA | 1 |
Bansi, DS | 1 |
Westaby, D | 1 |
Thillainayagam, AV | 1 |
Thomas, HC | 1 |
Cox, IJ | 1 |
Taylor-Robinson, SD | 1 |
Erdogan, D | 2 |
Heijnen, BH | 2 |
Kok, M | 1 |
Dinant, S | 2 |
Straatsburg, IH | 2 |
Gouma, DJ | 1 |
van Vliet, AK | 1 |
Hanada, N | 1 |
Kusano, S | 1 |
Hori, K | 1 |
Momi, H | 1 |
Hino, M | 1 |
Nagatsu, T | 1 |
Kakumu, S | 1 |
Okuyama, S | 1 |
Yoshii, Y | 1 |
Nagatsu, I | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Phase 3, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-controlled Study of AG-120 in Previously-treated Subjects With Nonresectable or Metastatic Cholangiocarcinoma With an IDH1 Mutation[NCT02989857] | Phase 3 | 187 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-02-20 | Completed | ||
A Phase 1, Multicenter, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation and Expansion, Safety, Pharmacokinetic, Pharmacodynamic, and Clinical Activity Study of Orally Administered AG-120 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors, Including Glioma, With an IDH1 Mutation[NCT02073994] | Phase 1 | 170 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2014-03-01 | Active, not recruiting | ||
Is It Possible To Predict PHLF? - Retrospective Analysis of Gadoxetate MRI Prior To Major Liver Resection[NCT04692259] | 200 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2020-12-29 | Recruiting | |||
HepaRAS TRIAL: CHANGES IN HEPATECTOMY RISK ASSESSMENT WHEN INCORPORATING MEBROFENIN HIDA FOR FUNCTIONAL EVALUATION OF THE LIVER REMNANT: A PILOT STUDY[NCT05280990] | 60 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-04-15 | Not yet recruiting | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) |
---|---|
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 1.6881 |
Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | ratio (Mean) |
---|---|
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 1.2369 |
Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose of Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | h*ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 91219.4 |
"The EQ visual analogue scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled The best health you can imagine and The worst health you can imagine. Responses are marked on a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating higher health-related quality of life (i.e., better outcome)." (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 4.6 |
Placebo | -2.8 |
DOR was defined as the time in months from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the IRC per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Participants with response and without progression were censored at the last observation. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of first confirmed CR or PR to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | NA |
DOR was defined as the time in months from date of first documented CR or PR to date of first documented disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever is earlier, as assessed by the Investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Participants with response and without progression were censored at the last observation. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of first confirmed CR or PR to disease progression or death regardless of cause (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | NA |
Placebo | NA |
ORR as assessed by the investigator was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 3.2 |
Placebo | 1.6 |
ORR as assessed by the IRC was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) defined as complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to confirmed CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 2.4 |
Placebo | 0 |
Overall survival was defined as the time in months from date of randomization to the date of death due to any cause. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the final collection were censored at the date the participant was last known to be alive, or the final collection date, whichever is earlier. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until the date of death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 10.3 |
Placebo | 7.5 |
Concomitant medications were medications that were ongoing or initiated after the first dose of the study drug but before the last dose plus 28 days. Percentage of participants who required at least one concomitant medications during the study along with their prescribed study drug (AG-120 or placebo) were reported. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose (Up to approximately 4 Years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 99.2 |
Placebo | 98.3 |
After Crossover to AG-120 | 95.3 |
PFS was defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as assessed by the investigator using RECIST v1.1, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as ≥20% increase in sum of the diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. No progression or death by data cutoff date was censored at the last adequate assessment date. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 2.7 |
Placebo | 1.4 |
%BRtrough is the percent inhibition for Rtrough. Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 73.726 |
Rtrough is the observed response value at the end of a dosing interval. Crossover C2D1 visit was combined with C2D1 visit for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 97.66 |
PFS is defined as the time from date of randomization to the date of first documented disease progression as assessed by the IRC using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] v1.1, or date of death due to any cause, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was defined as greater than or equal to (≥)20 percent (%) increase in sum of the diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum diameter recorded since the treatment started. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeters (mm) or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | 2.7 |
Placebo | 1.4 |
TTR was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented CR or PR for responders, as assessed by the Investigator per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to the date of first documented CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | NA |
Placebo | NA |
TTR was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of first documented CR or PR for responders, as assessed by the IRC per RECIST v1.1. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (TLs) and all pathological lymph nodes (LNs) (target and non target), with short axis <10mm. PR: ≥30% decrease in sum of diameters (SOD) from Baseline. Only responders were analyzed for this outcome measure. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From the date of randomization up to the date of first documented CR or PR (Up to approximately 2 years)
Intervention | months (Median) |
---|---|
AG-120 | NA |
Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose of Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | h*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 10972.2 | 16651.7 |
EORTC-QLQ-C30 is the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer - Quality of Life Questionnaire - Core Questionnaire. For EORTC QLQ-C30, subscales of physical functioning, pain, and appetite loss were assessed. These had 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much). For functional scales, higher scores=better QOL (positive change from Baseline=improvement). For symptom scales, lower scores=better QOL (negative change from Baseline=improvement). Using linear transformation, raw scores were standardized, so that scores ranged from 0 to 100. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1: Physical Functioning | Cycle 2 Day 1: Pain | Cycle 2 Day 1: Appetite Loss | Cycle 3 Day 1: Physical Functioning | Cycle 3 Day 1: Pain | Cycle 3 Day 1: Appetite Loss | |
AG-120 | -2.4 | 2.2 | 7.9 | -0.2 | -1.2 | -0.5 |
Placebo | -13.3 | 12.5 | 4.3 | -12.6 | -5.3 | 3.2 |
For HRQOL based on QLQ-BIL21, subscales of eating symptoms and pain symptoms were assessed. Each item is a 4-point Likert scale. There are 4 response levels (not at all, a little, quite a bit, and very much). Raw scores are converted into scale scores ranging from 0 to 100. For symptom scales, lower scores=better QOL (negative change from Baseline=improvement). (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | score on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Cycle 2 Day 1: Pain | Cycle 2 Day 1: Appetite Loss | Cycle 3 Day 1: Pain | Cycle 3 Day 1: Appetite Loss | |
AG-120 | 5.1 | 4.3 | 2.3 | -2.0 |
Placebo | 10.1 | 3.6 | -2.1 | 4.1 |
Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 4424.0 | 5050.5 |
The laboratory parameters evaluated by the investigator included hematology and chemistry. Laboratory abnormalities reported in this endpoint are Grade 3 or higher adverse events. Grading categories were determined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE), version 4.03. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug up to end of treatment visit for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Anaemia | Platelet Count Decreased | Neutrophil Count Decreased | White Blood Cell Count Decreased | Lymphocyte Count Decreased | Thrombocytopenia | Blood Loss Anaemia | Blood Bilirubin Increased | Hyponatraemia | Aspartate Aminotransferase Increased | Hypophosphataemia | Hyperbilirubinaemia | Hyperkalaemia | Blood Alkaline Phosphatase Increased | Alanine Aminotransferase Increased | Hypoalbuminaemia | Gamma-glutamyltransferase Increased | Hypercalcaemia | Hyperuricaemia | Hypokalaemia | Transaminases Increased | Blood Uric Acid Increased | |
After Crossover to AG-120 | 9.3 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.3 | 4.7 | 4.7 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
AG-120 | 7.3 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 5.7 | 5.7 | 4.9 | 3.3 | 3.3 | 2.4 | 2.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
Placebo | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 10.2 | 1.7 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 3.4 | 5.1 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
(NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Pre-dose C1D1, C2D1; Post-dose C1D1, C1D15, C2D1 and Day 1 of C3D1 and all cycles thereafter up to last dose plus 28 days (Up to approximately 4 years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Electrocardiogram QT Prolonged | Electrocardiogram Abnormal | |
After Crossover to AG-120 | 2.3 | 0.0 |
AG-120 | 9.8 | 0.8 |
Placebo | 3.4 | 0.0 |
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence associated with the use of a drug in participants, whether or not considered drug related. An AE or suspected adverse reaction is considered serious (an SAE) if it is fatal, life-threatening, causes in-patient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother or father exposed to study treatment or is an important medical event. Treatment-emergent adverse events are reported. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
After Crossover to AG-120 | 95.3 | 27.9 |
AG-120 | 97.6 | 35.0 |
Placebo | 96.6 | 23.7 |
The PGI-C is a self-rated evaluative instrument for assessment across 3 domains (physical function, appetite loss, and pain). The PGI-C is measured using a 7-point Likert scale, with 6= very much better, 5= moderately better, 4= a little better, 3= no change, 2= a little worse, 1= moderately worse, and 0= very much worse. A lower score indicates a worse outcome. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No Change | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Better | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Better | Physical Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Better | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Worse | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No Change | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Better | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Better | Physical Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No Change | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Worse | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No Change | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Better | Appetite Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Better | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: No Change | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: A Little Better | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderately Better | Pain Change: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Much Better | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Worse | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: No Change | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: A Little Better | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderately Better | Pain Change: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Much Better | |
AG-120 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 22.4 | 38.8 | 22.4 | 9.0 | 1.5 | 2.0 | 5.9 | 3.9 | 41.2 | 29.4 | 15.7 | 2.0 | 1.5 | 4.5 | 20.9 | 50.7 | 13.4 | 7.5 | 1.5 | 0.0 | 5.9 | 5.9 | 64.7 | 11.8 | 7.8 | 3.9 | 0.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 | 64.2 | 7.5 | 10.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 3.9 | 11.8 | 60.8 | 7.8 | 11.8 | 3.9 |
Placebo | 0.0 | 13.6 | 9.1 | 27.3 | 36.4 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 58.3 | 16.7 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 4.5 | 18.2 | 45.5 | 13.6 | 9.1 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 50.0 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 13.6 | 9.1 | 54.5 | 18.2 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.3 | 66.7 | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
Clinically significant vital signs were recorded as adverse events; there were some vital signs reported as Grade 3 or higher adverse events. Grading categories were determined by NCI CTCAE, version 4.03. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: From first dose of the study drug up to end of treatment visit for each intervention (Up to approximately 4 Years)
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Pyrexia | Weight Decreased | Hypertension | Hypotension | |
After Crossover to AG-120 | 2.3 | 0.0 | 7.0 | 2.3 |
AG-120 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 1.6 | 1.6 |
Placebo | 0.0 | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
The EQ-5D-5L assesses general health-related quality of life. Health is defined in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mobility: No Problems Walking | Mobility: Slight Problems Walking | Mobility: Moderate Problems Walking | Mobility: Severe Problems Walking | Mobility: Unable to Walk | Self-Care: No Problems Washing or Dressing | Self-Care: Slight Problems Washing or Dressing | Self-Care: Moderate Problems Washing or Dressing | Self-Care: Severe Problems Washing or Dressing | Usual Activities: No Problems Doing Usual Activities | Usual Activities: Slight Problems Doing Usual Activities | Usual Activities: Moderate Problems Doing Usual Activities | Usual Activities: Severe Problems Doing Usual Activities | Usual Activities: Unable to do Usual Activities | Pain/Discomfort: No Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: Slight Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: Moderate Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: Severe Pain or Discomfort | Pain/Discomfort: Extreme Pain or Discomfort | Anxiety/Depression: Not Anxious or Depressed | Anxiety/Depression: Slightly Anxious or Depressed | Anxiety/Depression: Moderately Anxious or Depressed | Anxiety/Depression: Severely Anxious or Depressed | |
AG-120 | 52.0 | 28.0 | 16.0 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 88.0 | 8.0 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 42.0 | 34.0 | 16.0 | 8.0 | 0.0 | 40.0 | 42.0 | 10.0 | 6.0 | 2.0 | 50.0 | 44.0 | 6.0 | 0.0 |
Placebo | 41.7 | 25.0 | 33.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 83.3 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 41.7 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 41.7 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 33.3 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 8.3 |
The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) score classified participants according to their functional impairment, with scores ranging from 0 to 4. ECOG PS: 0 = fully active, able to carry on all pre-disease performance without restriction; 1 = restricted in physically strenuous activity but ambulatory and able to carry out work of a light or sedentary nature, e.g., light housework, office work; 2 = ambulatory and capable of all self-care but unable to carry out any work activities, up and about more than 50% of waking hours; 3 = capable of only limited self-care, confined to bed or chair more than 50% of waking hours; 4 = completely disabled, cannot carry on any self-care, totally confined to bed or chair. A higher score means a worse functional status. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Baseline
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |
AG-120 | 39.7 | 59.5 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 0.0 |
Placebo | 31.1 | 67.2 | 1.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
The anchor-based questionnaire PGI-S contains the following 3 items (the severity of the physical functioning decline over the past week, the severity of the appetite decrease over the past week, and the severity of the pain over the past week). The PGI-S was measured using the possible outcomes none, mild, moderate, severe, and very severe. Percentages are rounded off to whole number at the nearest decimal. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Cycle 2 Day 1 and Cycle 3 Day 1
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: None | Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: Mild | Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderate | Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: Severe | Physical Decline: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Severe | Physical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: None | Physical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: Mild | Physical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderate | Physical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: Severe | Physical Decline: Cycle 3 Day 1: very Severe | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: None | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: Mild | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderate | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: Severe | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Severe | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: None | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: Mild | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderate | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: Severe | Appetite Decrease: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Severe | Pain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: None | Pain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: Mild | Pain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: Moderate | Pain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: Severe | Pain Severity: Cycle 2 Day 1: Very Severe | Pain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: None | Pain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: Mild | Pain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: Moderate | Pain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: Severe | Pain Severity: Cycle 3 Day 1: Very Severe | |
AG-120 | 55.2 | 23.9 | 16.4 | 3.0 | 1.5 | 70.6 | 11.8 | 15.7 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 53.7 | 32.8 | 10.4 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 70.6 | 15.7 | 7.8 | 5.9 | 0.0 | 32.8 | 38.8 | 23.9 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 39.2 | 35.3 | 17.6 | 7.8 | 0.0 |
Placebo | 31.8 | 27.3 | 31.8 | 9.1 | 0.0 | 75.0 | 16.7 | 8.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 45.5 | 13.6 | 36.4 | 4.5 | 0.0 | 58.3 | 25.0 | 16.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 31.8 | 13.6 | 40.9 | 9.1 | 4.5 | 33.3 | 25.0 | 41.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
%BAUEC0-4 is the percent inhibition for AUEC0-4. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | percent (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 20.22090 | 74.9750 |
AUEC0-4 is the area of the response curve from time point zero (predose) up to 4 hr postdose. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | h*ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 3334.3 | 368.4 |
B is the Baseline Effect Value. Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 1107.70 | 795.09 |
Crossover C1D1 and crossover C2D1 visits were combined with C1D1 and C2D1 visits, respectively for the analysis of this endpoint. (NCT02989857)
Timeframe: Post-dose Cycle 1 Day 1 and Cycle 2 Day 1 (each cycle = 28 days)
Intervention | hours (h) (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Cycle 1 Day 1 | Cycle 2 Day 1 | |
Randomization Phase AG-120 Plus Cross Over Phase AG-120 | 2.63 | 2.07 |
4 reviews available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer
Article | Year |
---|---|
Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical evaluation and future directions.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; H | 2022 |
Ivosidenib: an investigational drug for the treatment of biliary tract cancers.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Biliary Tract Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Drugs, Inve | 2021 |
IDH inhibitors in advanced cholangiocarcinoma: Another arrow in the quiver?
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangi | 2021 |
Ivosidenib for the treatment of isocitrate dehydrogenase-1 mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehydrog | 2021 |
5 trials available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer
Article | Year |
---|---|
Final Overall Survival Efficacy Results of Ivosidenib for Patients With Advanced Cholangiocarcinoma With IDH1 Mutation: The Phase 3 Randomized Clinical ClarIDHy Trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahe | 2021 |
FDA Approval Summary: Ivosidenib for the Treatment of Patients with Advanced Unresectable or Metastatic, Chemotherapy Refractory Cholangiocarcinoma with an IDH1 Mutation.
Topics: Abdominal Pain; Adult; Asthenia; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; | 2022 |
Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutant, chemotherapy-refractory cholangiocarcinoma (ClarIDHy): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dise | 2020 |
Safety and activity of ivosidenib in patients with IDH1-mutant advanced cholangiocarcinoma: a phase 1 study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dose | 2019 |
Preoperative assessment of postoperative remnant liver function using hepatobiliary scintigraphy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Female; Glycine; Humans; Imino Acids; Liver Fun | 2004 |
16 other studies available for glycine and Bile Duct Cancer
Article | Year |
---|---|
Ivosidenib Boosts OS in Cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd | 2021 |
New molecular mechanisms in cholangiocarcinoma: signals triggering interleukin-6 production in tumor cells and KRAS co-opted epigenetic mediators driving metabolic reprogramming.
Topics: Animals; Arachnodactyly; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Carcinogenesis; Cholangiocar | 2022 |
Real-World Data on Ivosidenib in Patients with Previously Treated Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1-Mutated Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas: An Early Exploratory Analysis.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd | 2022 |
Towards greater clarity in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum | 2020 |
Ivosidenib for advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum | 2020 |
Ivosidenib for advanced IDH1-mutant cholangiocarcinoma - Authors' reply.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Double-Blind Method; Glycine; Hum | 2020 |
Molecular and morphological changes induced by ivosidenib correlate with efficacy in mutant-
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cell Differentiation; Cholangiocarcinoma; Clinical Trial | 2021 |
In Vitro Evaluation of Rigosertib Antitumoral and Radiosensitizing Effects against Human Cholangiocarcinoma Cells.
Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Autophagy; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cell Cycle; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; | 2021 |
Topics: Aged; Aniline Compounds; Area Under Curve; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Female; Glycine; Hepatectomy; Humans | 2017 |
Hepatobiliary scintigraphy allows the evaluation of short-term functional toxicity of liver stereotactic body radiotherapy: Results of a pilot study.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Cholangiocarcinoma; Dose Fractionat | 2018 |
Targeted therapy for cholangiocarcinoma.
Topics: Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; Cholangiocarcinoma; Glycine; Humans; Isocitrate Dehyd | 2019 |
Extended liver venous deprivation before major hepatectomy induces marked and very rapid increase in future liver remnant function.
Topics: Aged; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Embolization, Therapeutic; Female; Gallbladder Neoplas | 2017 |
Metabolic profiling of bile in cholangiocarcinoma using in vitro magnetic resonance spectroscopy.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Algorithms; Bile; Bile Acids and Salts; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, In | 2010 |
Preoperative assessment of liver function: a comparison of 99mTc-Mebrofenin scintigraphy with indocyanine green clearance test.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aniline Compounds; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; F | 2004 |
[Good response in ARDS treated with sivelestat sodium hydrate during chemotherapy for cholangiocarcinoma].
Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Bile Duct Neoplasms; Bile Ducts, Intrahepatic; | 2007 |
Glycylprolyl beta-naphthylamidase activity in human serum.
Topics: Acute Disease; Adolescent; Adult; Age Factors; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Aspartate Aminotransferas | 1975 |