Page last updated: 2024-10-18

glycine and Abnormalities, Autosome

glycine has been researched along with Abnormalities, Autosome in 37 studies

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Evaluating potential relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor gene expression patterns and mutational status was an exploratory objective of the phase 3 TOURMALINE-MM1 study (NCT01564537) of ixazomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone (IRd) vs placebo-Rd in 722 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM)."5.34Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation. ( Avet-Loiseau, H; Bahlis, NJ; Berg, D; Dash, AB; Di Bacco, A; Li, B; Lin, J; Moreau, P; Richardson, PG; Shen, L; Zhang, J, 2020)
"Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) carrying standard- or high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (CAs) achieve similar complete response (CR) rates, but the later have inferior progression-free survival (PFS)."3.01Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma. ( Alameda, D; Alignani, D; Bargay, J; Blade, J; Burgos, L; Calasanz, MJ; Cedena, MT; Celay, J; Cordón, L; de la Rubia, J; Flores-Montero, J; Fresquet, V; Garcés, JJ; Garcia-Sanz, R; Goicoechea, I; Gutierrez, NC; Hernandez, MT; Krsnik, I; Lahuerta, JJ; Lara-Astiaso, D; Martin-Sanchez, J; Martinez-Climent, JA; Martinez-Lopez, J; Martinez-Martinez, R; Mateos, MV; Moraleda, JM; Orfao, A; Oriol, A; Paiva, B; Palomera, L; Puig, N; Ramos, MM; Rios, R; Rodriguez, I; Rodriguez, S; Rosiñol, L; San Miguel, J; Sarra, J; Sarvide, S; Vidriales, MB; Vilas-Zornoza, A, 2021)
" The dose-response behavior was not observed in either CA or SCE."1.48Cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood cultures of Chaetophractus villosus exposed in vivo to a glyphosate formulation (Roundup). ( Luaces, JP; Merani, MS; Mudry, MD; Palermo, AM; Rossi, LF, 2018)
"Glyphosate is an important broad-spectrum herbicide used in agriculture and residential areas for weed and vegetation control, respectively."1.48In vitro evaluation of genomic damage induced by glyphosate on human lymphocytes. ( Cervella, P; Gendusa, C; Ruberto, S; Santovito, A, 2018)
"Carbofuran treatment showed concentration-dependent increase in the number of MN."1.35Characterization of chromatin instabilities induced by glyphosate, terbuthylazine and carbofuran using cytome FISH assay. ( Mladinic, M; Perkovic, P; Zeljezic, D, 2009)
"Roundup did not induce chromosomal aberrations or micronuclei in either test system."1.33Comparative genotoxicity of the herbicides Roundup, Stomp and Reglone in plant and mammalian test systems. ( Benova, DK; Bineva, MV; Dimitrov, BD; Gadeva, PG, 2006)
"Neonatal-type nonketotic hyperglycinemia treatment remains unsatisfactory, even if started early."1.32Poor outcome for neonatal-type nonketotic hyperglycinemia treated with high-dose sodium benzoate and dextromethorphan. ( Chien, YH; Chou, SP; Hsu, CC; Huang, A; Hwu, WL; Lee, WT; Lu, FL, 2004)
"Glycine is a major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the CNS, but has also modulating effects at one of the glutamate receptors, the N-methyl-D-aspartate-(NMDA) receptor."1.29Ketamine and strychnine treatment of an infant with nonketotic hyperglycinaemia. ( Adams, HA; Günther, M; Heinemann, U; Roth, B; Sticht, G; Tegtmeyer-Metzdorf, H; Theisohn, M, 1995)
"WAGR syndrome is an acronym for a rare constellation of congenital abnormalities including predisposition to Wilms' tumor, Aniridia, Genitourinary malformations, and mental Retardation."1.29Altered trans-activational properties of a mutated WT1 gene product in a WAGR-associated Wilms' tumor. ( Haber, DA; Nisen, P; Park, S; Tomlinson, G, 1993)

Research

Studies (37)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199010 (27.03)18.7374
1990's7 (18.92)18.2507
2000's12 (32.43)29.6817
2010's5 (13.51)24.3611
2020's3 (8.11)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Finkler, M1
Rodrigues, GZP1
Kayser, JM1
Ziulkoski, AL1
Gehlen, G1
Dash, AB1
Zhang, J1
Shen, L1
Li, B1
Berg, D2
Lin, J2
Avet-Loiseau, H2
Bahlis, NJ2
Moreau, P2
Richardson, PG2
Di Bacco, A2
Goicoechea, I1
Puig, N1
Cedena, MT1
Burgos, L1
Cordón, L1
Vidriales, MB1
Flores-Montero, J1
Gutierrez, NC1
Calasanz, MJ1
Ramos, MM1
Lara-Astiaso, D1
Vilas-Zornoza, A1
Alignani, D1
Rodriguez, I1
Sarvide, S1
Alameda, D1
Garcés, JJ1
Rodriguez, S1
Fresquet, V1
Celay, J1
Garcia-Sanz, R1
Martinez-Lopez, J1
Oriol, A1
Rios, R1
Martin-Sanchez, J1
Martinez-Martinez, R1
Sarra, J1
Hernandez, MT1
de la Rubia, J1
Krsnik, I1
Moraleda, JM1
Palomera, L1
Bargay, J1
Martinez-Climent, JA1
Orfao, A1
Rosiñol, L1
Mateos, MV1
Lahuerta, JJ1
Blade, J1
San Miguel, J1
Paiva, B1
Chng, WJ1
Masszi, T1
Viterbo, L1
Pour, L1
Ganly, P1
Palumbo, A1
Cavo, M1
Langer, C1
Pluta, A1
Nagler, A1
Kumar, S1
Ben-Yehuda, D1
Rajkumar, SV1
San-Miguel, J1
van de Velde, H1
Esseltine, DL1
Rossi, LF1
Luaces, JP1
Palermo, AM1
Merani, MS1
Mudry, MD1
Santovito, A1
Ruberto, S1
Gendusa, C1
Cervella, P1
Mañas, F1
Peralta, L1
Raviolo, J1
García Ovando, H1
Weyers, A1
Ugnia, L1
Gonzalez Cid, M1
Larripa, I1
Gorla, N1
Tyshko, NV1
Britsina, MV1
Gmoshinskiĭ, IV1
Zhanataev, AK1
Zakharova, NS1
Zorin, SN1
Mazo, VK1
Semenov, BF1
Mladinic, M1
Perkovic, P1
Zeljezic, D1
Godi, M1
Mellone, S1
Petri, A1
Arrigo, T1
Bardelli, C1
Corrado, L1
Bellone, S1
Prodam, F1
Momigliano-Richiardi, P1
Bona, G1
Giordano, M1
Bolognesi, C1
Carrasquilla, G1
Volpi, S1
Solomon, KR1
Marshall, EJ1
Truta, E1
Vochita, G1
Rosu, CM1
Zamfirache, MM1
Olteanu, Z1
Siddiqui, S1
Meghvansi, MK1
Khan, SS1
Korman, SH1
Gutman, A1
BORENFREUND, E1
KRIM, M1
BENDICH, A1
SCHREIER, K1
MUELLER, W1
Chien, YH1
Hsu, CC1
Huang, A1
Chou, SP1
Lu, FL1
Lee, WT1
Hwu, WL1
Siviková, K1
Dianovskỳ, J1
Williams-Gray, CH1
Goris, A1
Foltynie, T1
Brown, J1
Maranian, M1
Walton, A1
Compston, DA1
Sawcer, SJ1
Barker, RA1
Dimitrov, BD1
Gadeva, PG1
Benova, DK1
Bineva, MV1
Naydenova, E1
Troev, K1
Topashka-Ancheva, M1
Hägele, G1
Ivanov, I1
Kril, A1
Tegtmeyer-Metzdorf, H1
Roth, B1
Günther, M1
Theisohn, M1
Heinemann, U1
Adams, HA1
Sticht, G1
Park, S1
Tomlinson, G1
Nisen, P1
Haber, DA1
Boneh, A1
Degani, Y1
Harari, M1
Schmitt, B1
Steinmann, B1
Lioi, MB1
Scarfì, MR1
Santoro, A1
Barbieri, R1
Zeni, O1
Di Berardino, D1
Ursini, MV1
Ezquieta Zubicaray, B1
Iguacel, AO1
Varela Junquera, JM1
Jariego Fente, CM1
González Gancedo, P1
Gracia Bouthelier, R1
Gabis, L1
Parton, P1
Roche, P1
Lenn, N1
Tudorica, A1
Huang, W1
Kanwar, YS1
Krakower, CA1
Manaligod, JR1
Justice, P1
Wong, PW1
Mottes, M1
Sangalli, A1
Valli, M1
Gomez Lira, M1
Tenni, R1
Buttitta, P1
Pignatti, PF1
Cetta, G1
Li, AP1
Long, TJ1
Benson, PF1
Marin, G1
Littlefield, JW1
Similä, S1
Käär, ML1
Straus, DS1
Hittelman, WN1
Rosenberg, LE1
Durant, JL1
Elsas, LJ1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, National, Open-label, Multicenter, Phase III Trial Studying Induction Therapy With Bortezomib/Lenalidomide/Dexamethasone (VRD-GEM), Followed by High-dose Chemotherapy With Melphalan-200 (MEL-200) Versus Busulfan-melphalan (BUMEL), and Consol[NCT01916252]Phase 3460 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2013-09-30Completed
An Open Label, Multicenter, Phase 2, Pilot Study, Evaluating Early Treatment With Bispecific T-cell Redirectors (Teclistamab and Talquetamab) in the Frontline Therapy of Newly Diagnosed High-risk Multiple Myeloma[NCT05849610]Phase 230 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2023-11-30Recruiting
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Multicenter Study Comparing Oral Ixazomib (MLN9708) Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone Versus Placebo Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone in Adult Patients With Relapsed and/or Refractory Multiple Myeloma[NCT01564537]Phase 3722 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-01Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Duration of Response (DOR)

DOR was measured as the time in months from the date of first documentation of a confirmed response of PR or better (CR [including sCR] + PR+ VGPR) to the date of the first documented disease progression (PD) among participants who responded to the treatment. Response was assessed by the investigator using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 38 months

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone26.0
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone21.7

OS in High-Risk Participants

Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported for high-risk participants. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone46.9
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.9

Overall Response Rate (ORR) as Assessed by the IRC

ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with Complete Response (CR) including stringent complete response (sCR), very good partial response (VGPR) and Partial Response (PR) assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months(approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone78.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone71.5

Overall Response Rate in Participants Defined by Polymorphism

Data is reported for percentage of participants defined by polymorphism defined by polymorphisms in proteasome genes, such as polymorphism P11A in PSMB1 gene. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone80.3
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone75.7

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until death (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone53.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone51.6

Overall Survival in High-Risk Participants Carrying Deletion 17 [Del(17)]

Overall survival is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of death. The high-risk participants whose myeloma carried del(17) subgroup was defined as the cases reported as positive for del(17) by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17) by local laboratory. Participants without documentation of death at the time of the analysis were censored at the date when they were last known to be alive. Data is only reported high-risk participants with Del(17). (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the time of screening until disease progression and thereafter every 12 weeks until death or study termination (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone42.2
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.4

Percentage of Participants With Complete Response (CR) and Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) as Assessed by the IRC

Response was assessed by the IRC using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) Criteria. CR is defined as negative immunofixation on the serum and urine and; disappearance of any soft tissue plasmacytomas and; < 5% plasma cells in bone marrow. VGPR is defined as Serum and urine M-protein detectable by immunofixation but not on electrophoresis or 90% or greater reduction in serum M-protein plus urine M-protein level < 100 mg per 24 hours. Percentages are rounded off to single decimal. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Ixazomib + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone48.1
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone39.0

PFS in High-Risk Participants

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using IMWG response criteria. High-risk participants are defined as participants carrying cytogenic abnormalities: del(17), translocation t(4;14), or t(14;16) as reported by the central laboratory combined with those cases that lacked a central laboratory result but with known del (17), t(4;14), or t(14;16) by local laboratory. Cytogenetic abnormalities of del(13) and +1q are not included in the analysis. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 38 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone18.7
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone9.3

Progression Free Survival (PFS) as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of first documentation of disease progression (PD) or death due to any cause, whichever occurs first. Response including PD was assessed by independent review committee (IRC) using the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria. PD requires 1 of the following: Increase of ≥ 25% from nadir in: Serum M-component (absolute increase ≥ 0.5 g/dl); Urine M-component (absolute increase ≥ 200 mg/24 hours); In patients without measurable serum and urine M-protein levels the difference between involved and uninvolved free light chain (FLC) levels (absolute increase > 10 mg/dl); Development of new or increase in the size of existing bone lesions or soft tissue plasmacytomas; Development of hypercalcemia (corrected serum calcium > 11.5 mg/dl) attributed solely to plasma cell proliferative disease. Status evaluated every 4 weeks until disease progression (PD) was confirmed. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From date of randomization until disease progression or death up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone20.6
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone14.7

Time to Progression (TTP) as Assessed by the IRC

TTP was measured as the time in months from the first dose of study treatment to the date of the first documented progressive disease (PD) as assessed by the IRC using IMWG criteria. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Day 1 of each cycle (every 4 weeks) until disease progression up to approximately 27 months (approximate median follow-up 15 months)

Interventionmonths (Median)
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone22.4
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone17.6

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTPain: BaselinePain: EOTNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone58.4-6.070.0-4.768.4-8.675.1-2.181.9-7.677.9-6.938.46.038.02.75.03.421.25.727.40.916.94.712.2-1.36.317.216.70.5

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Core Quality of Life (QOL) Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-C30)

The EORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30-question tool used to assess the overall quality of life in cancer participants. It consists of 15 domains: 1 global health status (GHS) scale, 5 functional scales (Physical, Role, Cognitive, Emotional, Social), and 9 symptom scales/items (Fatigue, Nausea and Vomiting, Pain, Dyspnea, Sleep Disturbance, Appetite Loss, Constipation, Diarrhea, Financial Impact).The EORTC-QLQ-C30 Global Health Status/QOL Scale is scored between 0 and 100, where higher scores indicate better Global Health Status/QOL. Negative changes from baseline indicate deterioration in QOL or functioning and positive changes indicate improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. High scores for the global and functional domains indicate higher quality of life or functioning. Higher scores on the symptom scales represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Global Health Index: BaselineGlobal Health Index: End of TreatmentGlobal Health Index: Last Follow-upPhysical Functioning: BaselinePhysical Functioning: EOTPhysical Functioning: Last Follow-upRole Functioning: BaselineRole Functioning: EOTRole Functioning: Last Follow-upEmotional Functioning: BaselineEmotional Functioning: EOTEmotional Functioning: Last Follow-upCognitive Functioning: BaselineCognitive Functioning: EOTCognitive Functioning: Last Follow-upSocial Functioning: BaselineSocial Functioning: EOTSocial Functioning: Last Follow-upFatigue: BaselineFatigue: EOTFatigue: Last Follow-upPain: BaselinePain: EOTPain: Last Follow-upNausea and Vomiting: BaselineNausea and Vomiting: EOTNausea and Vomiting: Last Follow-upDyspnea: BaselineDyspnea: EOTDyspnea: Last Follow-upInsomnia: BaselineInsomnia: EOTInsomnia: Last Follow-upAppetite Loss: BaselineAppetite Loss: EOTAppetite Loss: Last Follow-upConstipation: BaselineConstipation: EOTConstipation: Last Follow-upDiarrhea: BaselineDiarrhea: EOTDiarrhea: Last Follow-upFinancial Difficulties: BaselineFinancial Difficulties: EOTFinancial Difficulties: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone56.4-6.016.767.3-6.20.064.4-8.6-16.775.3-6.1-25.081.6-5.8-50.075.3-7.90.039.56.722.238.53.80.06.00.633.323.72.30.030.5-0.533.315.36.50.013.52.233.38.110.80.018.61.3-33.3

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTSide Effects of Treatment: Last Follow-upBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTBody Image: Last Follow-upFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOTFuture Perspective: Last Follow-up
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone30.41-2.5817.974.4337.0479.48-5.38-33.360.26-2.75-11.11

Change From Baseline in the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Multiple Myeloma Module (QLQ-MY-20)

The EORTC-QLQ-MY-20 is a patient-completed, 20-question quality of life questionnaire that has 4 independent subscales, 2 functional subscales (body image, future perspective), and 2 symptoms scales (disease symptoms and side-effects of treatment). The participant answers questions about their health during the past week using a 4-point scale where 1=Not at All to 4=Very Much. A negative change from Baseline indicates improvement. Scores are linearly transformed to a 0-100 scale. Higher scores on the symptom scales (e.g. Disease Symptoms, Side Effects of Treatment) represent higher levels of symptomatology or problems. High scores for Body Image and Future Perspective represent better quality of life or functioning. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline, EOT and follow-up (up to approximately 97 months)

Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
Disease Symptoms: BaselineDisease Symptoms: EOTDisease Symptoms: Last Follow-upSide Effects of Treatment: BaselineSide Effects of Treatment: EOTBody Image: BaselineBody Image: EOTFuture Perspective: BaselineFuture Perspective: EOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone29.71-2.351.1117.234.5278.00-0.2756.992.76

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, laboratory values, vital sign measurements and reported adverse events (AEs) were collected and assessed to evaluate the safety of therapy throughout the study. An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (example, a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a drug, whether or not it is considered related to the drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; or congenital anomaly; or a medically important event. (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: From the date of signing of the informed consent form through 30 days after the last dose of study drug up to approximately 115 months

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
TEAEsSAEs
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone359205
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone357201

Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in Pain Response

"Pain response was defined as 30% reduction from Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF) worst pain score over the last 24 hours without an increase in analgesic (oral morphine equivalents) use at 2 consecutive evaluations. The BPI-SF contains 15 items designed to capture the pain severity (worst, least, average, and now [current pain]), pain location, medication to relieve the pain, and the interference of pain with various daily activities including general activity, mood, walking activity, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life. The pain severity items are rated on a 0 to 10 scale where: 0=no pain and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine and averaged for a total score of 0 (best) to 10 (Worst)." (NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Baseline and end of treatment (EOT) (up to approximately 38 months)

,
InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
BaselineEOT
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone345145
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone351153

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Placebo + Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone0000000000000

Plasma Concentration Over Time for Ixazomib

(NCT01564537)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and post-dose at multiple timepoints up to Cycle 10 Day 1 (each cycle length = 28 days)

Interventionμg/mL (Mean)
Cycle 1 Day 1Cycle 1 Day 1, 1 Hour Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 1, 4 Hours Post-DoseCycle 1 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 2 Day 14, Pre-DoseCycle 3 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 4 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 5 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 6 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 7 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 8 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 9 Day 1, Pre-DoseCycle 10 Day 1, Pre-Dose
Ixazomib+ Lenalidomide + Dexamethasone4.7936.315.66.832.47.122.482.412.422.572.712.372.512.82

Trials

3 trials available for glycine and Abnormalities, Autosome

ArticleYear
Clinical benefit of ixazomib plus lenalidomide-dexamethasone in myeloma patients with non-canonical NF-κB pathway activation.
    European journal of haematology, 2020, Volume: 105, Issue:3

    Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Biomarkers, Tumor; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberr

2020
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Deep MRD profiling defines outcome and unveils different modes of treatment resistance in standard- and high-risk myeloma.
    Blood, 2021, 01-07, Volume: 137, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Bortezomib; Chromosome

2021
Ixazomib significantly prolongs progression-free survival in high-risk relapsed/refractory myeloma patients.
    Blood, 2017, 12-14, Volume: 130, Issue:24

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Boron Compounds; Chromosome Aberrations

2017

Other Studies

34 other studies available for glycine and Abnormalities, Autosome

ArticleYear
Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects induced by associated commercial glyphosate and 2,4-D formulations using the
    Journal of environmental science and health. Part. B, Pesticides, food contaminants, and agricultural wastes, 2022, Volume: 57, Issue:2

    Topics: 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid; Biological Assay; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA Damage; Glycine; Glyph

2022
Cytogenetic damage in peripheral blood cultures of Chaetophractus villosus exposed in vivo to a glyphosate formulation (Roundup).
    Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2018, Aug-15, Volume: 157

    Topics: Animals; Armadillos; Cell Proliferation; Chromosome Aberrations; Cytogenetic Analysis; Female; Glyci

2018
In vitro evaluation of genomic damage induced by glyphosate on human lymphocytes.
    Environmental science and pollution research international, 2018, Volume: 25, Issue:34

    Topics: Cell Nucleus; Chromosome Aberrations; Cytokinesis; DNA Damage; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Huma

2018
Genotoxicity of AMPA, the environmental metabolite of glyphosate, assessed by the Comet assay and cytogenetic tests.
    Ecotoxicology and environmental safety, 2009, Volume: 72, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Animals; Carcinoma, Hepatocellular; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Survival; Chromosome A

2009
[Medical and biological safety assessment of genetically modified maize event MON 88017. Report 2. Genotoxicologic, immunologic and allergologic examinations].
    Voprosy pitaniia, 2008, Volume: 77, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA Damage; Drug Resistance; Food Analysis; Food Hypersensitivity;

2008
Characterization of chromatin instabilities induced by glyphosate, terbuthylazine and carbofuran using cytome FISH assay.
    Toxicology letters, 2009, Sep-10, Volume: 189, Issue:2

    Topics: Carbofuran; Cell Nucleus; Cells, Cultured; Chromosome Aberrations; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug;

2009
A recurrent signal peptide mutation in the growth hormone releasing hormone receptor with defective translocation to the cell surface and isolated growth hormone deficiency.
    The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2009, Volume: 94, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Blotting, Western; Body Height; Case-Control Studies; Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid; C

2009
Biomonitoring of genotoxic risk in agricultural workers from five colombian regions: association to occupational exposure to glyphosate.
    Journal of toxicology and environmental health. Part A, 2009, Volume: 72, Issue:15-16

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Agricultural Workers' Diseases; Chromosome Aberrations; Environmental Monitoring;

2009
Evaluation of Roundup-induced toxicity on genetic material and on length growth of barley seedlings.
    Acta biologica Hungarica, 2011, Volume: 62, Issue:3

    Topics: Chromosome Aberrations; Cytogenetics; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Glycine; Glyphosate; Hordeum

2011
Glyphosate, alachor and maleic hydrazide have genotoxic effect on Trigonella foenum-graecum L.
    Bulletin of environmental contamination and toxicology, 2012, Volume: 88, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetamides; Chromosome Aberrations; Glycine; Glyphosate; Herbicides; Maleic Hydrazide; Mitosis; Muta

2012
Pitfalls in the diagnosis of glycine encephalopathy (non-ketotic hyperglycinemia).
    Developmental medicine and child neurology, 2002, Volume: 44, Issue:10

    Topics: Anticonvulsants; Brain Diseases, Metabolic, Inborn; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberrations; Consan

2002
CHROMOSOMAL ABERRATIONS INDUCED BY HYPONITRITE AND HYDROXYLAMINE DERIVATIVES.
    Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1964, Volume: 32

    Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Carcinogens; Cell Division; Chromosome Aberrations; Cricetinae; DNA; DNA, Neo

1964
[IDIOPATHIC HYPERGLYCINEMIA (GLYCINOSIS)].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 1964, Sep-11, Volume: 89

    Topics: Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Blood Protein Disorders; Chromosome Aberrations; Diagnosis, Di

1964
Poor outcome for neonatal-type nonketotic hyperglycinemia treated with high-dose sodium benzoate and dextromethorphan.
    Journal of child neurology, 2004, Volume: 19, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberrations; Dextromethorphan; Diazepam; Disease Progression; Di

2004
Cytogenetic effect of technical glyphosate on cultivated bovine peripheral lymphocytes.
    International journal of hygiene and environmental health, 2006, Volume: 209, Issue:1

    Topics: Animals; Cattle; Cell Proliferation; Cells, Cultured; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Mammalian

2006
Prevalence of the LRRK2 G2019S mutation in a UK community based idiopathic Parkinson's disease cohort.
    Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry, 2006, Volume: 77, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amino Acid Substitution; Chromosome Aberrations; Cohort Studies; DNA

2006
Comparative genotoxicity of the herbicides Roundup, Stomp and Reglone in plant and mammalian test systems.
    Mutagenesis, 2006, Volume: 21, Issue:6

    Topics: Aniline Compounds; Animals; Bone Marrow; Chromosome Aberrations; Diquat; Erythroid Precursor Cells;

2006
Synthesis, cytotoxicity and clastogenicity of novel alpha-aminophosphonic acids.
    Amino acids, 2007, Volume: 33, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow Cells; Cattle; Cell Death; Cell Line; Cell Proliferation; Chromosome Aberration

2007
Ketamine and strychnine treatment of an infant with nonketotic hyperglycinaemia.
    European journal of pediatrics, 1995, Volume: 154, Issue:8

    Topics: Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Drug Therapy, Co

1995
Altered trans-activational properties of a mutated WT1 gene product in a WAGR-associated Wilms' tumor.
    Cancer research, 1993, Oct-15, Volume: 53, Issue:20

    Topics: Alternative Splicing; Amino Acid Sequence; Animals; Aspartic Acid; Base Sequence; Chloramphenicol O-

1993
Prognostic clues and outcome of early treatment of nonketotic hyperglycinemia.
    Pediatric neurology, 1996, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Benzoates; Benzoic Acid; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Child, Pre

1996
Dextromethorphan in a child with nonketotic hyperglycinaemia--a 6-year follow up.
    European journal of pediatrics, 1998, Volume: 157, Issue:4

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Antitussive Agents; Child; Child, Presch

1998
Genotoxicity and oxidative stress induced by pesticide exposure in bovine lymphocyte cultures in vitro.
    Mutation research, 1998, Jul-17, Volume: 403, Issue:1-2

    Topics: Animals; Cattle; Cell Survival; Cells, Cultured; Chromosome Aberrations; Glucosephosphate Dehydrogen

1998
[Gly380Arg and Asn540Lys mutations of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 in achondroplasia and hypochndroplasia in the Spanish population].
    Medicina clinica, 1999, Mar-06, Volume: 112, Issue:8

    Topics: Achondroplasia; Arginine; Asparagine; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Chromosomes, Hum

1999
In vivo 1H magnetic resonance spectroscopic measurement of brain glycine levels in nonketotic hyperglycinemia.
    Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of Neuroimaging, 2001, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Aspartic Acid; Brain; Brain Diseases, Metabolic; Choline; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorde

2001
Biochemical, morphological and hybrid studies in hyperprolinemic mice.
    Biomedicine / [publiee pour l'A.A.I.C.I.G.], 1975, Volume: 22, Issue:3

    Topics: Amino Acid Metabolism, Inborn Errors; Amino Acid Oxidoreductases; Animals; Chromosome Aberrations; C

1975
Mild dominant osteogenesis imperfecta with intrafamilial variability: the cause is a serine for glycine alpha 1(I) 901 substitution in a type-I collagen gene.
    Human genetics, 1992, Volume: 89, Issue:5

    Topics: Base Sequence; Child; Chromosome Aberrations; Codon; Collagen; DNA Mutational Analysis; Female; Gene

1992
An evaluation of the genotoxic potential of glyphosate.
    Fundamental and applied toxicology : official journal of the Society of Toxicology, 1988, Volume: 10, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Bone Marrow; Bone Marrow Cells; Cell Survival; Chromosome Aberrations; Cricetinae; Cricetul

1988
Biochemical abnormalities in chromosome anomalies.
    Lancet (London, England), 1971, Nov-27, Volume: 2, Issue:7735

    Topics: Carbon Isotopes; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Down Syndrome; Erythrocytes; Glycine;

1971
Selection of morphologically normal cell lines from polyoma-transformed BHK21/13 hamster fibroblasts.
    Journal of virology, 1968, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Aminopterin; Animals; Bromodeoxyuridine; Cell Line; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Chromosome Aber

1968
Hyperglycinuria in a family with autosomal dominantly inherited cataract.
    Clinical genetics, 1974, Volume: 6, Issue:2

    Topics: Cataract; Child, Preschool; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Creatinine; Electrophoresi

1974
Induction by mutagens of tandem gene duplications in the glyS region of the Escherichia coli chromosome.
    Genetics, 1974, Volume: 78, Issue:3

    Topics: Acridines; Amino Acyl-tRNA Synthetases; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosomes, Bacterial; Escherichia

1974
The type and time of occurrence of aminopterin-induced chromosome aberrations in cultured Potorous cells.
    Mutation research, 1973, Volume: 18, Issue:1

    Topics: Aminopterin; Animals; Cell Division; Cells, Cultured; Chromatids; Chromosome Aberrations; DNA; Femal

1973
Familial iminoglycinuria. An inborn error of renal tubular transport.
    The New England journal of medicine, 1968, Jun-27, Volume: 278, Issue:26

    Topics: Adult; Child; Chromosome Aberrations; Chromosome Disorders; Deafness; Female; Genotype; Glycine; Het

1968