Page last updated: 2024-10-27

glimepiride and Weight Loss

glimepiride has been researched along with Weight Loss in 12 studies

glimepiride: structure given in first source

Weight Loss: Decrease in existing BODY WEIGHT.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."9.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks."7.83Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016)
"5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia."5.20Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2). ( Benroubi, M; Giorgino, F; Pechtner, V; Sun, JH; Zimmermann, AG, 2015)
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."5.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
" His HbA1c-concentration is 71 mmol/mol, despite an initial 8% weight loss and treatment with metformin and glimepiride."3.96[Starting insulin or not? And if so, which basal insulin?] ( Tack, CJ; van de Laar, FA, 2020)
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks."3.83Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016)
" This was driven by the relative advantage of weight loss compared with rosiglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine, and administration frequency compared with exenatide."3.78Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme results. ( Bøgelund, M; Ericsson, Å; Jendle, J; Nilsen, B; Ridderstråle, M; Torffvit, O, 2012)
" Safety endpoints were adverse events including hypoglycaemia."2.84Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial). ( Ishida, H; Kitaoka, M; Ohsugi, M; Satoh, J; Seino, Y; Shihara, N; Terauchi, Y; Yabe, D; Yamada, Y, 2017)
"Treatment with liraglutide 1."2.76Liraglutide provides similar glycaemic control as glimepiride (both in combination with metformin) and reduces body weight and systolic blood pressure in Asian population with type 2 diabetes from China, South Korea and India: a 16-week, randomized, doubl ( Bech, OM; Bhattacharyya, A; Chen, L; Ji, Q; Kim, KW; Kumar, A; Liu, X; Ma, J; Tandon, N; Yang, W; Yoon, KH; Zychma, M, 2011)
"Two hundred seventy-one type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with poor glycemic control and who were overweight were enrolled in this study."2.74Direct comparison among oral hypoglycemic agents and their association with insulin resistance evaluated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp: the 60's study. ( Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Gravina, A; Maffioli, P; Mereu, R; Palumbo, I; Salvadeo, SA, 2009)

Research

Studies (12)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's2 (16.67)29.6817
2010's9 (75.00)24.3611
2020's1 (8.33)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Tack, CJ1
van de Laar, FA1
Derosa, G2
Bonaventura, A1
Bianchi, L1
Romano, D1
Fogari, E1
D'Angelo, A2
Maffioli, P2
Leiter, LA1
Yoon, KH2
Arias, P1
Langslet, G1
Xie, J2
Balis, DA1
Millington, D1
Vercruysse, F1
Canovatchel, W2
Meininger, G2
Giorgino, F1
Benroubi, M1
Sun, JH1
Zimmermann, AG1
Pechtner, V1
Blonde, L1
Stenlöf, K1
Fung, A1
Terauchi, Y1
Yamada, Y1
Ishida, H1
Ohsugi, M1
Kitaoka, M1
Satoh, J1
Yabe, D1
Shihara, N1
Seino, Y1
Salvadeo, SA1
Ferrari, I1
Gravina, A1
Mereu, R1
Palumbo, I1
Cicero, AF1
Jendle, J2
Nauck, MA1
Matthews, DR2
Frid, A2
Hermansen, K2
Düring, M2
Zdravkovic, M1
Strauss, BJ1
Garber, AJ1
Al-Jebawi, AF1
Yang, W1
Chen, L1
Ji, Q1
Liu, X1
Ma, J1
Tandon, N1
Bhattacharyya, A1
Kumar, A1
Kim, KW1
Bech, OM1
Zychma, M1
Torffvit, O1
Ridderstråle, M1
Ericsson, Å1
Nilsen, B1
Bøgelund, M1
Nauck, M1
Thomsen, AB1
Shah, N1
Tankova, T1
Mitha, I1

Clinical Trials (10)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812]Phase 31,452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
Effect of Dulaglutide on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03590626]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Noninferiority Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Glimepiride[NCT01075282]Phase 3810 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Contr[NCT01106651]Phase 3716 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in Elderly Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01183104]305 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power)
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-2): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy Versus Metformin and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Subjects With[NCT00318461]Phase 31,091 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Victoza Efficacy in the Regression of Cardiovascular Dysfunction In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01761318]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
Effect of Liraglutide or Glimepiride Added to Metformin on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00614120]Phase 3929 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-01-31Completed
Prospective, Parallel Goups Study, Aimed to Evaluating Possible Benefits of the Treatment of New Generation Hypoglycaemic Drugs Compared to Sulphonylureas for the Tratment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT04272359]138 participants (Anticipated)Observational [Patient Registry]2019-05-06Recruiting
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.65
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.74
Glimepiride-0.55

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.82
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.93
Glimepiride-0.81

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.7
Glimepiride1.0

Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg4.9
Glimepiride34.2

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.08
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.76
Insulin Glargine-0.63

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks and 78 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine-0.65-0.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.89-0.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.16-0.90

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Mass Index

Body mass index (BMI) is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilograms per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 238)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine0.440.620.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.50-0.39-0.39
LY2189265 1.5 mg-0.64-0.64-0.64

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Weight

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine1.011.441.28
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.47-1.33-1.54
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.82-1.87-1.96

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles

The self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening meal; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3 AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least Squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (Daily Mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=199, 204, 190)52 weeks (n=180, 185, 176)78 weeks (n=172, 164, 168)
Insulin Glargine-1.58-1.44-1.47
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.46-1.32-1.15
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.79-1.69-1.55

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the EuroQol 5 Dimension

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EQ-5D UK, 26 weeks (n=257, 254, 249)EQ-5D UK, 52 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)EQ-5D UK, 78 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)VAS, 26 weeks (n=253, 252, 243)VAS, 52 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)VAS, 78 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.01-0.040.000.81.12.2
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.003.42.33.2
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.010.013.33.23.8

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living questionnaire (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire [APPADL]) contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=256, 256, 248)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)
Insulin Glargine-0.3-0.6-0.3
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.10.40.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.70.91.0

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=258, 258, 251)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.10.10.1
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.20.20.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.10.50.5

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Low Blood Sugar Survey

The Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) contains 33 items comprised of 2 subscales (behavior and worry), each of which is rated on a 5-point numeric rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). It captures behavioral changes associated with the concerns and experiences of hypoglycemia and the degree to which participants are worried about certain aspects associated with hypoglycemia during the previous 4 weeks. The behavior (or avoidance) subscale has 15 items, and the worry (or affect) subscale has 18 items. Subscale scores are calculated by summing participant responses to items (behavior range 0-60; worry range 0-72). A total score is calculated as the sum of both subscales (range 0-132). Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on subscales and total score. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=255, 255, 244)52 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)78 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)
Insulin Glargine0.3-1.0-2.0
LY2189265 0.75 mg-2.4-4.1-4.7
LY2189265 1.5 mg-2.8-4.2-4.6

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)QTcF interval, 52 weeks (n=231, 240, 228)QTcF interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)PR interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)PR interval, 52 weeks (n=230, 240, 227)PR interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)
Insulin Glargine1.243.704.441.241.501.21
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.101.343.442.331.883.27
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.711.551.662.782.612.62

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Heart Rate

Electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=241, 247, 231)52 weeks (n=232, 242, 231)78 weeks (n=223, 222, 225)
Insulin Glargine-1.24-1.01-0.26
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.900.380.47
LY2189265 1.5 mg2.642.412.49

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits/liter (Median)
Amylase (total), 26 weeksAmylase (total), 52 weeksAmylase (total), 78 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 26 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 52 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 78 weeksLipase, 26 weeksLipase, 52 weeksLipase, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine2.0003.0001.0001.0001.0000.000-1.000-1.000-2.000
LY2189265 0.75 mg4.0005.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000
LY2189265 1.5 mg4.0004.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicogram/milliliter (Mean)
26 weeks (n=266, 267, 258)52 weeks (n=266, 269, 259)78 weeks (n=267, 269, 259)
Insulin Glargine0.1490.1760.151
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.0970.1320.035
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.1630.1280.086

Change From Baseline to 26, 52, and 78 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliliter of mercury (mmHG) (Least Squares Mean)
SBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)SBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)SBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)DBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)DBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)DBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-0.030.510.51-0.29-0.93-1.04
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.600.09-0.59-0.17-0.19-0.36
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.280.17-0.70-0.16-0.26-0.44

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Glucagon Concentration

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
52 weeks (n=232, 231, 228)78 weeks (n=235, 235, 232)
Insulin Glargine-3.85-3.65
LY2189265 0.75 mg-3.31-3.37
LY2189265 1.5 mg-3.91-3.57

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta (β)-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population for both HOMA2-B and HOMA-2S were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline of C-peptide based HOMA2-%B and HOMA2-%S were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%B, 52 weeks (n=175, 181)HOMA2-%B, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)HOMA2-%S, 52 weeks (n=175,181)HOMA2-%S, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)
LY2189265 0.75 mg24.6015.66-2.66-3.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg29.9528.54-2.89-2.64

Change in Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Sitting pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 260, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-1.21-0.52-0.91
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.740.510.61
LY2189265 1.5 mg1.561.291.31

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine848079
LY2189265 0.75 mg1229991
LY2189265 1.5 mg153140129

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine403543
LY2189265 0.75 mg746059
LY2189265 1.5 mg977174

Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0816
LY2189265 0.75 mg42034
LY2189265 1.5 mg21124

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated include myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with adjudicated CV events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any CV event, 26 weeksAny fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny CV event, 52 weeksAny fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny CV event, 78 weekAny fatal CV event, 78 weekAny non-fatal CV event, 78 week
Insulin Glargine303615918
LY2189265 0.75 mg101404616
LY2189265 1.5 mg202303303

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine000
LY2189265 0.75 mg111
LY2189265 1.5 mg122

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26, 52, 78 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug (83 Weeks Maximum)

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed at baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks, and at the safety follow-up visit 30 days after study drug discontinuation (83 weeks). The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA at each time point were summarized. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, 78, and 83 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks83 weeks
LY2189265 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg11310

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine137175192
LY2189265 0.75 mg146175188
LY2189265 1.5 mg160189201

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine122447789103360910931358240519635202226
LY2189265 0.75 mg000315444515484709911117147184192428
LY2189265 1.5 mg112311515607500757884145185215111720

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0.010.010.013.643.343.034.824.413.801.862.071.810.150.080.07
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.002.521.971.663.582.682.380.960.650.590.140.090.07
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.000.012.352.031.673.793.082.561.230.900.770.080.070.05

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.39
Canagliflozin 100 mg-18.1
Canagliflozin 300 mg-20.3

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.03
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.60
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.73

Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.03
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.18

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.10
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.52
Canagliflozin 300 mg-6.79

Change in Tissue Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.02
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.04
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.18

Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.28
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.87
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.38

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg-3.1

Percent Change in Distal Forearm Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.8

Percent Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.6

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg6.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg6.2

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg0.2

Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.0

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.7
Canagliflozin 100 mg2.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg8.4

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo28.0
Canagliflozin 100 mg47.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg58.5

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionkg (Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.367
Glimepiride0.309

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.66
Glimepiride-0.77

Change From Baseline in HOMA-β at 52 W

β cell function is measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment(HOMA-β). HOMA β = [20 x fasting insulin (μU/mL)] / [fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5] (NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Sitagliptin10.2
Glimepiride23.7

Change From Baseline in Insulin/Proinsulin Ratio at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionratio (Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.049
Glimepiride-0.002

Number of Participants With Hypoglycaemia

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 W

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sitagliptin7
Glimepiride23

The Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c < 6.9 %

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: 52 W

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sitagliptin89
Glimepiride86

Change in Body Weight at Week 104

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.70
Lira 1.2-1.89
Glimepiride0.95

Change in Body Weight at Week 156

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.43
Lira 1.2-1.68
Glimepiride1.05

Change in Body Weight at Week 52

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.45
Lira 1.2-2.05
Glimepiride1.12

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 104

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-15.82
Lira 1.2-9.36
Glimepiride1.97

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 156

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-12.06
Lira 1.2-5.45
Glimepiride4.57

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 52

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-25.57
Lira 1.2-15.21
Glimepiride-5.29

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.88
Lira 1.2-0.59
Glimepiride-0.28

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 156

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.71
Lira 1.2-0.44
Glimepiride-0.16

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 52

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-1.14
Lira 1.2-0.84
Glimepiride-0.51

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.15
Lira 1.2-27.34
Glimepiride-24.85

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-34.83
Lira 1.2-25.68
Glimepiride-23.84

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.4
Lira 1.2-30.8
Glimepiride-24.5

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.76
Lira 1.2-8.28
Glimepiride-7.95

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.01
Lira 1.2-7.53
Glimepiride-7.97

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-9.6
Lira 1.2-8.4
Glimepiride-5.6

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride0533405
Lira 1.2068133
Lira 1.817187

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride1344
Lira 1.2031
Lira 1.80133

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 104

"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met64.48
Lira 1.2 + Met27.30
Lira 1.8 + Met17.81
Met Mono-7.89
Met + Glim11.25

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26

"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met20.45
Lira 1.2 + Met20.33
Lira 1.8 + Met26.12
Met Mono-1.63
Met + Glim24.68

Change in Body Weight at Week 104

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-2.07
Lira 1.2 + Met-3.03
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.91
Met Mono-1.80
Met + Glim0.70

Change in Body Weight at Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.78
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.58
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.79
Met Mono-1.51
Met + Glim0.95

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 104

Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.80
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.20
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.18
Met Mono0.75
Met + Glim-0.64

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.13
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.63
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.68
Met Mono0.40
Met + Glim-1.31

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104

Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage of total haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.36
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.56
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.58
Met Mono0.25
Met + Glim-0.50

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26

Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

InterventionPercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.69
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.97
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.00
Met Mono0.09
Met + Glim-0.98

Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.59
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.22
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.10
Met Mono-0.43
Met + Glim-1.80

Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26

Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.68
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.33
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.57
Met Mono-0.62
Met + Glim-2.46

Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.27
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.56
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.44
Met Mono-0.20
Met + Glim-0.29

Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26

"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.23
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.40
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.56
Met Mono-0.44
Met + Glim-0.44

Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 104

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104

,,,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
AllMajorMinorSymptoms only
Lira 0.6 + Met5202329
Lira 1.2 + Met5112624
Lira 1.8 + Met4902227
Met + Glim5240284240
Met Mono180612

Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 26

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-26

,,,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Lira 0.6 + Met01517
Lira 1.2 + Met037
Lira 1.8 + Met0922
Met + Glim0136175
Met Mono0610

Change in Beta-cell Function

"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met15.3
Lira 1.2 + Met17.8
Lira 1.8 + Met21.7
Glim + Met21.8

Change in Body Weight

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

Interventionkg (Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.8
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.3
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.4
Glim + Met0.1

Change in Fasting Lipid Profile, APO-B

Change in fasting lipid profiles based on apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

Interventiong/L (Median)
Lira 0.6 + Met0.02
Lira 1.2 + Met0.00
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.00
Glim + Met0.01

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c)

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.0
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.3
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.4
Glim + Met-1.3

Change in Self-measured Fasting Plasma Glucose

Change in self-measured fasting plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Self-measurement of plasma glucose was performed using a glucose meter and subjects were instructed to record self-measured plasma glucose values into a diary. (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.83
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.96
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.28
Glim + Met-2.13

7-point Self-measured Plasma Glucose Profiles

Summary of 7-Point Profiles of Self-Measured Plasma Glucose by Treatment, Week and Time. The 7 time points for self-measurements for all treatment groups were: Before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime, measured over 16 weeks of treatment (at week 0, 8, 12 and 16). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, 8, 12 and 16

,,,
Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Week 0 - Before breakfastWeek 0 - 90 minutes after breakfastWeek 0 - Before lunchWeek 0 - 90 minutes after lunchWeek 0 - Before dinnerWeek 0 - 90 minutes after dinnerWeek 0 - BedtimeWeek 8 - Before breakfastWeek 8 - 90 minutes after breakfastWeek 8 - Before lunchWeek 8 - 90 minutes after lunchWeek 8 - Before dinnerWeek 8 - 90 minutes after dinnerWeek 8 - BedtimeWeek 12 - Before breakfastWeek 12 - 90 minutes after breakfastWeek 12 - Before lunchWeek 12 - 90 minutes after lunchWeek 12 - Before dinnerWeek 12 - 90 minutes after dinnerWeek 12 - BedtimeWeek 16 - Before breakfastWeek 16 - 90 minutes after breakfastWeek 16 - Before lunchWeek 16 - 90 minutes after lunchWeek 16 - Before dinnerWeek 16 - 90 minutes after dinnerWeek 16 - Bedtime
Glim + Met163.8238.5175.8227.6180.2231.6202.7130.1201.2132.6184.3143.3190.2163.6128.5200.8129.3185.3144.2188.5159.9131.0195.1128.8182.2144.9192.6157.7
Lira 0.6 + Met168.2245.9178.5234.2194.8239.6205.7137.0198.5144.8187.2159.1193.7169.1137.8197.5141.8183.7156.4197.2168.2137.3195.6140.5185.8151.5195.0166.4
Lira 1.2 + Met167.5248.0180.5232.3184.8239.6208.1130.4190.1136.5176.9147.8187.1161.6130.2185.7135.6174.7143.4185.7158.9132.9188.7137.0181.4148.4183.3159.8
Lira 1.8 + Met168.8245.4176.9234.4190.9244.0219.3133.7178.5138.0177.9144.2183.3155.8130.2178.6134.1173.7144.5183.5158.9128.6177.6137.8173.2140.9173.2151.6

Change in Fasting Lipid Profile

"Change in fasting lipid profiles from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Fasting lipid profiles is based on:~Total Cholesterol (TC)~Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)~Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C)~High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)~Triglyceride (TG)~Free Fatty Acid (FFA)" (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16

,,,
Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Change in TC (Absolute), N=221, 216, 216, 228Change in LDL-C (Absolute), N=221, 216, 216, 228Change in VLDL-C (Absolute), N=213, 210, 207, 220Change in HDL-C (Absolute), N=217, 212, 212, 220Change in TG (Absolute), N=220, 212, 213, 226Change in FFA (Absolute), N=218, 214, 216, 227
Glim + Met0.020.040.05-0.01-0.07-0.02
Lira 0.6 + Met0.060.060.03-0.02-0.08-0.03
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.01-0.030.05-0.05-0.06-0.04
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.030.000.01-0.05-0.22-0.10

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes over 16 weeks of treatment occurring from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 16). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: weeks 0-16

,,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glim + Met28086
Lira 0.6 + Met0612
Lira 1.2 + Met0011
Lira 1.8 + Met059

Reviews

1 review available for glimepiride and Weight Loss

ArticleYear
Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2013
Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2013
Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2013
Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2013

Trials

7 trials available for glimepiride and Weight Loss

ArticleYear
Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2014, Volume: 63, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method

2014
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes

2017
Direct comparison among oral hypoglycemic agents and their association with insulin resistance evaluated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp: the 60's study.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2009, Volume: 58, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Caloric Restriction; Diabetes Mel

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Liraglutide provides similar glycaemic control as glimepiride (both in combination with metformin) and reduces body weight and systolic blood pressure in Asian population with type 2 diabetes from China, South Korea and India: a 16-week, randomized, doubl
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Asian People; Blood Pressure; China; Diabetes Mellitus,

2011

Other Studies

4 other studies available for glimepiride and Weight Loss

ArticleYear
[Starting insulin or not? And if so, which basal insulin?]
    Nederlands tijdschrift voor geneeskunde, 2020, 09-24, Volume: 164

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic C

2020
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Remission of diabetes mellitus type 2 with severe hyperglycemia after Exenatide treatment.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2010, Volume: 90, Issue:3

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Peptides; Rem

2010
Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme results.
    Journal of medical economics, 2012, Volume: 15 Suppl 2

    Topics: Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Exenatide; Gl

2012