glimepiride has been researched along with Weight Loss in 12 studies
glimepiride: structure given in first source
Weight Loss: Decrease in existing BODY WEIGHT.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia." | 9.19 | Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014) |
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks." | 7.83 | Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016) |
"5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia." | 5.20 | Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2). ( Benroubi, M; Giorgino, F; Pechtner, V; Sun, JH; Zimmermann, AG, 2015) |
"To evaluate the effects of vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on glycemic control, insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia." | 5.19 | Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014) |
" His HbA1c-concentration is 71 mmol/mol, despite an initial 8% weight loss and treatment with metformin and glimepiride." | 3.96 | [Starting insulin or not? And if so, which basal insulin?] ( Tack, CJ; van de Laar, FA, 2020) |
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks." | 3.83 | Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016) |
" This was driven by the relative advantage of weight loss compared with rosiglitazone, glimepiride, and insulin glargine, and administration frequency compared with exenatide." | 3.78 | Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme results. ( Bøgelund, M; Ericsson, Å; Jendle, J; Nilsen, B; Ridderstråle, M; Torffvit, O, 2012) |
" Safety endpoints were adverse events including hypoglycaemia." | 2.84 | Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial). ( Ishida, H; Kitaoka, M; Ohsugi, M; Satoh, J; Seino, Y; Shihara, N; Terauchi, Y; Yabe, D; Yamada, Y, 2017) |
"Treatment with liraglutide 1." | 2.76 | Liraglutide provides similar glycaemic control as glimepiride (both in combination with metformin) and reduces body weight and systolic blood pressure in Asian population with type 2 diabetes from China, South Korea and India: a 16-week, randomized, doubl ( Bech, OM; Bhattacharyya, A; Chen, L; Ji, Q; Kim, KW; Kumar, A; Liu, X; Ma, J; Tandon, N; Yang, W; Yoon, KH; Zychma, M, 2011) |
"Two hundred seventy-one type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with poor glycemic control and who were overweight were enrolled in this study." | 2.74 | Direct comparison among oral hypoglycemic agents and their association with insulin resistance evaluated by euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp: the 60's study. ( Cicero, AF; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Gravina, A; Maffioli, P; Mereu, R; Palumbo, I; Salvadeo, SA, 2009) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 2 (16.67) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 9 (75.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 1 (8.33) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Tack, CJ | 1 |
van de Laar, FA | 1 |
Derosa, G | 2 |
Bonaventura, A | 1 |
Bianchi, L | 1 |
Romano, D | 1 |
Fogari, E | 1 |
D'Angelo, A | 2 |
Maffioli, P | 2 |
Leiter, LA | 1 |
Yoon, KH | 2 |
Arias, P | 1 |
Langslet, G | 1 |
Xie, J | 2 |
Balis, DA | 1 |
Millington, D | 1 |
Vercruysse, F | 1 |
Canovatchel, W | 2 |
Meininger, G | 2 |
Giorgino, F | 1 |
Benroubi, M | 1 |
Sun, JH | 1 |
Zimmermann, AG | 1 |
Pechtner, V | 1 |
Blonde, L | 1 |
Stenlöf, K | 1 |
Fung, A | 1 |
Terauchi, Y | 1 |
Yamada, Y | 1 |
Ishida, H | 1 |
Ohsugi, M | 1 |
Kitaoka, M | 1 |
Satoh, J | 1 |
Yabe, D | 1 |
Shihara, N | 1 |
Seino, Y | 1 |
Salvadeo, SA | 1 |
Ferrari, I | 1 |
Gravina, A | 1 |
Mereu, R | 1 |
Palumbo, I | 1 |
Cicero, AF | 1 |
Jendle, J | 2 |
Nauck, MA | 1 |
Matthews, DR | 2 |
Frid, A | 2 |
Hermansen, K | 2 |
Düring, M | 2 |
Zdravkovic, M | 1 |
Strauss, BJ | 1 |
Garber, AJ | 1 |
Al-Jebawi, AF | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Chen, L | 1 |
Ji, Q | 1 |
Liu, X | 1 |
Ma, J | 1 |
Tandon, N | 1 |
Bhattacharyya, A | 1 |
Kumar, A | 1 |
Kim, KW | 1 |
Bech, OM | 1 |
Zychma, M | 1 |
Torffvit, O | 1 |
Ridderstråle, M | 1 |
Ericsson, Å | 1 |
Nilsen, B | 1 |
Bøgelund, M | 1 |
Nauck, M | 1 |
Thomsen, AB | 1 |
Shah, N | 1 |
Tankova, T | 1 |
Mitha, I | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812] | Phase 3 | 1,452 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-09-30 | Completed | ||
Effect of Dulaglutide on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03590626] | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-01-01 | Completed | |||
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Noninferiority Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Glimepiride[NCT01075282] | Phase 3 | 810 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Contr[NCT01106651] | Phase 3 | 716 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in Elderly Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01183104] | 305 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-31 | Completed | |||
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723] | Phase 3 | 746 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power) | ||
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-2): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy Versus Metformin and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Subjects With[NCT00318461] | Phase 3 | 1,091 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-05-31 | Completed | ||
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Victoza Efficacy in the Regression of Cardiovascular Dysfunction In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01761318] | Phase 4 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-11-30 | Completed | ||
Effect of Liraglutide or Glimepiride Added to Metformin on Glycaemic Control in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00614120] | Phase 3 | 929 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-01-31 | Completed | ||
Prospective, Parallel Goups Study, Aimed to Evaluating Possible Benefits of the Treatment of New Generation Hypoglycaemic Drugs Compared to Sulphonylureas for the Tratment of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT04272359] | 138 participants (Anticipated) | Observational [Patient Registry] | 2019-05-06 | Recruiting | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.65 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.74 |
Glimepiride | -0.55 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.82 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.93 |
Glimepiride | -0.81 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -4.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.7 |
Glimepiride | 1.0 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 5.6 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 4.9 |
Glimepiride | 34.2 |
Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.08 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.76 |
Insulin Glargine | -0.63 |
Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks, and 78 weeks
Intervention | percent (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.65 | -0.59 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.89 | -0.62 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.16 | -0.90 |
Body mass index (BMI) is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 238) | 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.50 | -0.39 | -0.39 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -0.64 | -0.64 | -0.64 |
Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 1.01 | 1.44 | 1.28 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.47 | -1.33 | -1.54 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.82 | -1.87 | -1.96 |
The self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening meal; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3 AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least Squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (Daily Mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=199, 204, 190) | 52 weeks (n=180, 185, 176) | 78 weeks (n=172, 164, 168) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.58 | -1.44 | -1.47 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.46 | -1.32 | -1.15 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.79 | -1.69 | -1.55 |
The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQ-5D UK, 26 weeks (n=257, 254, 249) | EQ-5D UK, 52 weeks (n=259, 260, 253) | EQ-5D UK, 78 weeks (n=259, 260, 253) | VAS, 26 weeks (n=253, 252, 243) | VAS, 52 weeks (n=260, 258, 252) | VAS, 78 weeks (n=260, 258, 252) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living questionnaire (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire [APPADL]) contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=256, 256, 248) | 52 weeks (n=260, 261, 249) | 78 weeks (n=260, 261, 249) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.3 | -0.6 | -0.3 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=258, 258, 251) | 52 weeks (n=260, 261, 252) | 78 weeks (n=260, 261, 252) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
The Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) contains 33 items comprised of 2 subscales (behavior and worry), each of which is rated on a 5-point numeric rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). It captures behavioral changes associated with the concerns and experiences of hypoglycemia and the degree to which participants are worried about certain aspects associated with hypoglycemia during the previous 4 weeks. The behavior (or avoidance) subscale has 15 items, and the worry (or affect) subscale has 18 items. Subscale scores are calculated by summing participant responses to items (behavior range 0-60; worry range 0-72). A total score is calculated as the sum of both subscales (range 0-132). Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on subscales and total score. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=255, 255, 244) | 52 weeks (n=258, 259, 245) | 78 weeks (n=258, 259, 245) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.3 | -1.0 | -2.0 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -2.4 | -4.1 | -4.7 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -2.8 | -4.2 | -4.6 |
The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | milliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTcF interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229) | QTcF interval, 52 weeks (n=231, 240, 228) | QTcF interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222) | PR interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229) | PR interval, 52 weeks (n=230, 240, 227) | PR interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222) | |
Insulin Glargine | 1.24 | 3.70 | 4.44 | 1.24 | 1.50 | 1.21 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.10 | 1.34 | 3.44 | 2.33 | 1.88 | 3.27 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.71 | 1.55 | 1.66 | 2.78 | 2.61 | 2.62 |
Electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | beats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=241, 247, 231) | 52 weeks (n=232, 242, 231) | 78 weeks (n=223, 222, 225) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.24 | -1.01 | -0.26 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2.64 | 2.41 | 2.49 |
Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units/liter (Median) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amylase (total), 26 weeks | Amylase (total), 52 weeks | Amylase (total), 78 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 26 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 52 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 78 weeks | Lipase, 26 weeks | Lipase, 52 weeks | Lipase, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 2.000 | 3.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | -1.000 | -1.000 | -2.000 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 4.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 4.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
(NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | picogram/milliliter (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=266, 267, 258) | 52 weeks (n=266, 269, 259) | 78 weeks (n=267, 269, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.149 | 0.176 | 0.151 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.097 | 0.132 | 0.035 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.163 | 0.128 | 0.086 |
Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | milliliter of mercury (mmHG) (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | SBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | SBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | DBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | DBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | DBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.03 | 0.51 | 0.51 | -0.29 | -0.93 | -1.04 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.60 | 0.09 | -0.59 | -0.17 | -0.19 | -0.36 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.28 | 0.17 | -0.70 | -0.16 | -0.26 | -0.44 |
Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | picomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
52 weeks (n=232, 231, 228) | 78 weeks (n=235, 235, 232) | |
Insulin Glargine | -3.85 | -3.65 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -3.31 | -3.37 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -3.91 | -3.57 |
The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta (β)-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population for both HOMA2-B and HOMA-2S were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline of C-peptide based HOMA2-%B and HOMA2-%S were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | percentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HOMA2-%B, 52 weeks (n=175, 181) | HOMA2-%B, 78 weeks (n=167, 165) | HOMA2-%S, 52 weeks (n=175,181) | HOMA2-%S, 78 weeks (n=167, 165) | |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 24.60 | 15.66 | -2.66 | -3.62 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 29.95 | 28.54 | -2.89 | -2.64 |
Sitting pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | beats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=257, 260, 245) | 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.21 | -0.52 | -0.91 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.61 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1.56 | 1.29 | 1.31 |
Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 84 | 80 | 79 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 122 | 99 | 91 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 153 | 140 | 129 |
Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 40 | 35 | 43 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 74 | 60 | 59 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 97 | 71 | 74 |
Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0 | 8 | 16 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 4 | 20 | 34 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2 | 11 | 24 |
Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated include myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with adjudicated CV events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any CV event, 26 weeks | Any fatal CV event, 26 weeks | Any non-fatal CV event, 26 weeks | Any CV event, 52 weeks | Any fatal CV event, 52 weeks | Any non-fatal CV event, 52 weeks | Any CV event, 78 week | Any fatal CV event, 78 week | Any non-fatal CV event, 78 week | |
Insulin Glargine | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 1 | 1 | 1 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1 | 2 | 2 |
LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed at baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks, and at the safety follow-up visit 30 days after study drug discontinuation (83 weeks). The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA at each time point were summarized. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, 78, and 83 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | 83 weeks | |
LY2189265 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 137 | 175 | 192 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 146 | 175 | 188 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 160 | 189 | 201 |
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | events (Number) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severe HE, 26 weeks | Severe HE, 52 weeks | Severe HE, 78 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 26 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 52 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 78 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 1 | 2 | 2 | 447 | 789 | 1033 | 609 | 1093 | 1358 | 240 | 519 | 635 | 20 | 22 | 26 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 315 | 444 | 515 | 484 | 709 | 911 | 117 | 147 | 184 | 19 | 24 | 28 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1 | 1 | 2 | 311 | 515 | 607 | 500 | 757 | 884 | 145 | 185 | 215 | 11 | 17 | 20 |
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | events per participant per year (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severe HE, 26 weeks | Severe HE, 52 weeks | Severe HE, 78 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 26 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 52 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 78 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.64 | 3.34 | 3.03 | 4.82 | 4.41 | 3.80 | 1.86 | 2.07 | 1.81 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 1.97 | 1.66 | 3.58 | 2.68 | 2.38 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.35 | 2.03 | 1.67 | 3.79 | 3.08 | 2.56 | 1.23 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.39 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -18.1 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -20.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.03 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.60 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.73 |
Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.00 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.03 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.18 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.10 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.52 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -6.79 |
Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.02 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.04 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.18 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.28 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.87 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.38 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.1 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -2.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -3.1 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.8 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.0 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.6 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 6.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 6.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 0.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.9 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.7 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 2.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 8.4 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 28.0 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 47.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 58.5 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.367 |
Glimepiride | 0.309 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.66 |
Glimepiride | -0.77 |
β cell function is measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment(HOMA-β). HOMA β = [20 x fasting insulin (μU/mL)] / [fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5] (NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 10.2 |
Glimepiride | 23.7 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | ratio (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.049 |
Glimepiride | -0.002 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 W
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 7 |
Glimepiride | 23 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: 52 W
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 89 |
Glimepiride | 86 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.70 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.89 |
Glimepiride | 0.95 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.43 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.68 |
Glimepiride | 1.05 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.45 |
Lira 1.2 | -2.05 |
Glimepiride | 1.12 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -15.82 |
Lira 1.2 | -9.36 |
Glimepiride | 1.97 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -12.06 |
Lira 1.2 | -5.45 |
Glimepiride | 4.57 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -25.57 |
Lira 1.2 | -15.21 |
Glimepiride | -5.29 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.88 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.59 |
Glimepiride | -0.28 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.71 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.44 |
Glimepiride | -0.16 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -1.14 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.84 |
Glimepiride | -0.51 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.15 |
Lira 1.2 | -27.34 |
Glimepiride | -24.85 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -34.83 |
Lira 1.2 | -25.68 |
Glimepiride | -23.84 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.4 |
Lira 1.2 | -30.8 |
Glimepiride | -24.5 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.76 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.28 |
Glimepiride | -7.95 |
Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.01 |
Lira 1.2 | -7.53 |
Glimepiride | -7.97 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -9.6 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.4 |
Glimepiride | -5.6 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 0 | 533 | 405 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 68 | 133 |
Lira 1.8 | 1 | 71 | 87 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 1 | 34 | 4 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Lira 1.8 | 0 | 13 | 3 |
"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 64.48 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 27.30 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 17.81 |
Met Mono | -7.89 |
Met + Glim | 11.25 |
"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | percentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 20.45 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 20.33 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 26.12 |
Met Mono | -1.63 |
Met + Glim | 24.68 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -2.07 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -3.03 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.91 |
Met Mono | -1.80 |
Met + Glim | 0.70 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.78 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.58 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.79 |
Met Mono | -1.51 |
Met + Glim | 0.95 |
Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.80 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.20 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.18 |
Met Mono | 0.75 |
Met + Glim | -0.64 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.13 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.63 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.68 |
Met Mono | 0.40 |
Met + Glim | -1.31 |
Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage of total haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.36 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.56 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.58 |
Met Mono | 0.25 |
Met + Glim | -0.50 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | Percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.69 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.97 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.00 |
Met Mono | 0.09 |
Met + Glim | -0.98 |
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.59 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.22 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.10 |
Met Mono | -0.43 |
Met + Glim | -1.80 |
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.68 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.33 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.57 |
Met Mono | -0.62 |
Met + Glim | -2.46 |
"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.27 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.56 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.44 |
Met Mono | -0.20 |
Met + Glim | -0.29 |
"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/l (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.23 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.40 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.56 |
Met Mono | -0.44 |
Met + Glim | -0.44 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104
Intervention | episodes (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All | Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 52 | 0 | 23 | 29 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 51 | 1 | 26 | 24 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 49 | 0 | 22 | 27 |
Met + Glim | 524 | 0 | 284 | 240 |
Met Mono | 18 | 0 | 6 | 12 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-26
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 0 | 9 | 22 |
Met + Glim | 0 | 136 | 175 |
Met Mono | 0 | 6 | 10 |
"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | percentage point (%point) (Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 15.3 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 17.8 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 21.7 |
Glim + Met | 21.8 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.8 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.3 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.4 |
Glim + Met | 0.1 |
Change in fasting lipid profiles based on apolipoprotein B (Apo-B) from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | g/L (Median) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 0.02 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 0.00 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.00 |
Glim + Met | 0.01 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.0 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.3 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.4 |
Glim + Met | -1.3 |
Change in self-measured fasting plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Self-measurement of plasma glucose was performed using a glucose meter and subjects were instructed to record self-measured plasma glucose values into a diary. (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.83 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.96 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.28 |
Glim + Met | -2.13 |
Summary of 7-Point Profiles of Self-Measured Plasma Glucose by Treatment, Week and Time. The 7 time points for self-measurements for all treatment groups were: Before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime, measured over 16 weeks of treatment (at week 0, 8, 12 and 16). (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, 8, 12 and 16
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 0 - Before breakfast | Week 0 - 90 minutes after breakfast | Week 0 - Before lunch | Week 0 - 90 minutes after lunch | Week 0 - Before dinner | Week 0 - 90 minutes after dinner | Week 0 - Bedtime | Week 8 - Before breakfast | Week 8 - 90 minutes after breakfast | Week 8 - Before lunch | Week 8 - 90 minutes after lunch | Week 8 - Before dinner | Week 8 - 90 minutes after dinner | Week 8 - Bedtime | Week 12 - Before breakfast | Week 12 - 90 minutes after breakfast | Week 12 - Before lunch | Week 12 - 90 minutes after lunch | Week 12 - Before dinner | Week 12 - 90 minutes after dinner | Week 12 - Bedtime | Week 16 - Before breakfast | Week 16 - 90 minutes after breakfast | Week 16 - Before lunch | Week 16 - 90 minutes after lunch | Week 16 - Before dinner | Week 16 - 90 minutes after dinner | Week 16 - Bedtime | |
Glim + Met | 163.8 | 238.5 | 175.8 | 227.6 | 180.2 | 231.6 | 202.7 | 130.1 | 201.2 | 132.6 | 184.3 | 143.3 | 190.2 | 163.6 | 128.5 | 200.8 | 129.3 | 185.3 | 144.2 | 188.5 | 159.9 | 131.0 | 195.1 | 128.8 | 182.2 | 144.9 | 192.6 | 157.7 |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 168.2 | 245.9 | 178.5 | 234.2 | 194.8 | 239.6 | 205.7 | 137.0 | 198.5 | 144.8 | 187.2 | 159.1 | 193.7 | 169.1 | 137.8 | 197.5 | 141.8 | 183.7 | 156.4 | 197.2 | 168.2 | 137.3 | 195.6 | 140.5 | 185.8 | 151.5 | 195.0 | 166.4 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 167.5 | 248.0 | 180.5 | 232.3 | 184.8 | 239.6 | 208.1 | 130.4 | 190.1 | 136.5 | 176.9 | 147.8 | 187.1 | 161.6 | 130.2 | 185.7 | 135.6 | 174.7 | 143.4 | 185.7 | 158.9 | 132.9 | 188.7 | 137.0 | 181.4 | 148.4 | 183.3 | 159.8 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 168.8 | 245.4 | 176.9 | 234.4 | 190.9 | 244.0 | 219.3 | 133.7 | 178.5 | 138.0 | 177.9 | 144.2 | 183.3 | 155.8 | 130.2 | 178.6 | 134.1 | 173.7 | 144.5 | 183.5 | 158.9 | 128.6 | 177.6 | 137.8 | 173.2 | 140.9 | 173.2 | 151.6 |
"Change in fasting lipid profiles from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Fasting lipid profiles is based on:~Total Cholesterol (TC)~Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C)~Very Low-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (VLDL-C)~High-density Lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDL-C)~Triglyceride (TG)~Free Fatty Acid (FFA)" (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: week 0, week 16
Intervention | mmol/L (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change in TC (Absolute), N=221, 216, 216, 228 | Change in LDL-C (Absolute), N=221, 216, 216, 228 | Change in VLDL-C (Absolute), N=213, 210, 207, 220 | Change in HDL-C (Absolute), N=217, 212, 212, 220 | Change in TG (Absolute), N=220, 212, 213, 226 | Change in FFA (Absolute), N=218, 214, 216, 227 | |
Glim + Met | 0.02 | 0.04 | 0.05 | -0.01 | -0.07 | -0.02 |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.03 | -0.02 | -0.08 | -0.03 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.01 | -0.03 | 0.05 | -0.05 | -0.06 | -0.04 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 | -0.05 | -0.22 | -0.10 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes over 16 weeks of treatment occurring from baseline (week 0) to end of treatment (week 16). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00614120)
Timeframe: weeks 0-16
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glim + Met | 2 | 80 | 86 |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 0 | 6 | 12 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 0 | 0 | 11 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 0 | 5 | 9 |
1 review available for glimepiride and Weight Loss
7 trials available for glimepiride and Weight Loss
4 other studies available for glimepiride and Weight Loss
Article | Year |
---|---|
[Starting insulin or not? And if so, which basal insulin?]
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glycated Hemoglobin; Glycemic C | 2020 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Remission of diabetes mellitus type 2 with severe hyperglycemia after Exenatide treatment.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Female; Humans; Metformin; Middle Aged; Obesity; Peptides; Rem | 2010 |
Willingness to pay for diabetes drug therapy in type 2 diabetes patients: based on LEAD clinical programme results.
Topics: Cost of Illness; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Disease Management; Exenatide; Gl | 2012 |