glimepiride has been researched along with Hypoglycemia in 106 studies
glimepiride: structure given in first source
Hypoglycemia: A syndrome of abnormally low BLOOD GLUCOSE level. Clinical hypoglycemia has diverse etiologies. Severe hypoglycemia eventually lead to glucose deprivation of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM resulting in HUNGER; SWEATING; PARESTHESIA; impaired mental function; SEIZURES; COMA; and even DEATH.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes." | 9.30 | Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019) |
"Adding mitiglinide/voglibose to vildagliptin therapy results in more efficient postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycemia than adding glimepiride." | 9.27 | Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial. ( Fujimoto, K; Hamamoto, Y; Hamasaki, A; Honjo, S; Shibayama, Y; Yamaguchi, E, 2018) |
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5." | 9.22 | Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016) |
"Reported rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lower with glimepiride as compared to glyburide." | 9.20 | Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals. ( Davis, SN; Joy, NG; Tate, DB, 2015) |
"Vildagliptin, in addition to metformin, was more effective than glimepiride + metformin in reducing insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia." | 9.19 | Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014) |
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes." | 9.17 | Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013) |
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain." | 9.14 | Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010) |
"Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride." | 9.12 | Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia. ( Cryer, PE; Fender, AB; Gerich, JE; Gosmanov, NR; Meyer, C; Nihalani, A; Sinkin, JC; Szoke, E, 2006) |
"Linagliptin treatment for 104 weeks was recently reported to achieve non-inferior glucose-lowering effects compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin." | 6.78 | Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years. ( Emser, A; Gallwitz, B; Rosenstock, J; von Eynatten, M; Woerle, HJ, 2013) |
"Glimepiride was detected at a concentration of 24." | 5.39 | [A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration]. ( Araki, E; Fujieda, N; Hazekawa, I, 2013) |
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes." | 5.30 | Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019) |
"Adding mitiglinide/voglibose to vildagliptin therapy results in more efficient postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycemia than adding glimepiride." | 5.27 | Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial. ( Fujimoto, K; Hamamoto, Y; Hamasaki, A; Honjo, S; Shibayama, Y; Yamaguchi, E, 2018) |
"Vildagliptin effectively improved glucose level with a significantly greater reduction in glycemic variability and hypoglycemia than glimepiride in patients with T2DM ongoing metformin therapy." | 5.24 | The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Hur, KY; Jin, SM; Kim, G; Kim, JH; Lee, MK; Oh, S, 2017) |
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5." | 5.22 | Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016) |
"5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia." | 5.20 | Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2). ( Benroubi, M; Giorgino, F; Pechtner, V; Sun, JH; Zimmermann, AG, 2015) |
"Reported rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lower with glimepiride as compared to glyburide." | 5.20 | Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals. ( Davis, SN; Joy, NG; Tate, DB, 2015) |
"Vildagliptin, in addition to metformin, was more effective than glimepiride + metformin in reducing insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia." | 5.19 | Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014) |
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes." | 5.17 | Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013) |
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain." | 5.14 | Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010) |
" glimepiride can improve psychological and emotional well-being and health perceptions by reducing anxiety and worry associated with weight gain." | 5.14 | Patient-reported outcomes following treatment with the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide or glimepiride in monotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Blonde, L; Bode, BW; Garber, A; Hale, PM; Hammer, M; Magwire, M; Testa, MA, 2010) |
"These results confirm earlier reports that insulin glargine provides superior glycemic control with less hypoglycemia and demonstrates that these benefits are consistent between different ethnicities." | 5.12 | Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin therapy in Asian Type 2 diabetes patients. ( Chung, KD; Kim, KW; Pan, CY; Sinnassamy, P, 2007) |
"In patients with T2DM, inadequately controlled on OADs, once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride is effective in improving metabolic control with a reduced incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin." | 5.12 | Therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride. ( Aschner, P; Calvo, C; Eliaschewitz, FG; Jimenez, J; Ramirez, LA; Ruiz, M; Valbuena, H; Villena, J, 2006) |
"Once-daily glargine can be administered in a flexible morning or bedtime regimen (plus morning glimepiride) to achieve good glycemic control without any difference in hypoglycemia." | 5.12 | Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility. ( Maxeiner, S; Raptis, S; Standl, E, 2006) |
"Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride." | 5.12 | Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia. ( Cryer, PE; Fender, AB; Gerich, JE; Gosmanov, NR; Meyer, C; Nihalani, A; Sinkin, JC; Szoke, E, 2006) |
"The risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia was lower with glimepiride in combination with morning and bedtime insulin glargine than with glimepiride in combination with bedtime NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes." | 5.10 | Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial. ( Fritsche, A; Häring, HU; Schweitzer, MA, 2003) |
" Glimepiride is used to treat type II diabetes but is associated with side effects, like lower half-life, faster elimination, and hypoglycemia." | 4.12 | Self-assembled di- and tripeptide gels for the passive entrapment and pH-responsive, sustained release of an antidiabetic drug, glimepiride. ( Bhatia, Y; Halder, M; Singh, Y, 2022) |
"In quarters with glipizide/glimepiride use, hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common in person quarters with concurrent warfarin use compared with quarters without warfarin use (294/416,479 v 1903/3,938,939; adjusted odds ratio 1." | 3.81 | Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis. ( Goldman, DP; Gong, C; Jena, AB; Peters, A; Romley, JA; Williams, B, 2015) |
"Gatifloxacin, a commonly prescribed antimicrobial can produce profound hypoglycemia and disturbances in glucose homeostasis especially in diabetes patients on sulphonylureas." | 3.73 | Gatifloxacin induced abnormalities in glucose homeostasis in a patient on glimepiride. ( Kesavadev, J; Rasheed, SA, 2006) |
"Seventy drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 52." | 3.30 | Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study. ( Ahn, J; Florez, JC; Lim, S; Nauck, MA; Sohn, M, 2023) |
"Patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol (7% to 10%) were randomized to empagliflozin 25 mg or glimepiride 1 to 4 mg for 104 weeks as add-on to metformin." | 2.87 | Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial. ( Andersen, KR; Ridderstråle, M; Rosenstock, J; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2018) |
" The most common drug-related adverse events in both dulaglutide groups (≥5% of patients) included diarrhoea, nausea, increased lipase, decreased appetite, abdominal distension and vomiting." | 2.87 | Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial. ( Chen, YH; Cho, YM; Gu, L; Huang, CN; Li, P; Wang, F; Wang, WQ; Yang, J, 2018) |
" Safety endpoints were adverse events including hypoglycaemia." | 2.84 | Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial). ( Ishida, H; Kitaoka, M; Ohsugi, M; Satoh, J; Seino, Y; Shihara, N; Terauchi, Y; Yabe, D; Yamada, Y, 2017) |
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for dulaglutide 1." | 2.82 | A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8). ( Dungan, KM; Fahrbach, JL; Jiang, HH; Perez Manghi, F; Pintilei, E; Robertson, KE; Shell, J; Weitgasser, R, 2016) |
" The insulin dosing algorithm was not sufficient to equalize nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two insulins." | 2.80 | Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes. ( Bolli, GB; Candelas, C; Dain, MP; Deerochanawong, C; Home, PD; Landgraf, W; Mathieu, C; Pilorget, V; Riddle, MC, 2015) |
"Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiate insulin therapy when other treatments fail; how best to do this is poorly defined." | 2.79 | Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections. ( Gao, L; Riddle, MC; Rosenstock, J; Vlajnic, A, 2014) |
" The incidence rates of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, including hypoglycaemia, during the double-blind randomized period were similar in both groups." | 2.79 | Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension. ( Kadowaki, T; Kondo, K, 2014) |
"Glimepiride was up-titrated once weekly in a treat-to-target manner; liraglutide was up-titrated once weekly to 1." | 2.79 | Glucose-lowering effects and low risk of hypoglycemia in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young when treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. ( Bagger, JI; Faber, J; Hansen, T; Holst, JJ; Knop, FK; Pedersen, O; Vilsbøll, T; Østoft, SH, 2014) |
"People with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (n = 99) were randomly assigned on a 1∶1∶1 basis to receive insulin glargin, with fixed doses of glimepiride, metformin, and glimepiride plus metformin." | 2.79 | Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Chon, S; Kang, JG; Lee, CB; Noh, J; Oh, SJ; Park, CY; Park, SW, 2014) |
"Vildagliptin treatment was associated with less fluctuation of glucose levels than glimepiride treatment as assessed by 24-h CGM device, suggesting vildagliptin may have the potential to offer long-term beneficial effects for patients with T2DM in preventing the development of complications of diabetes." | 2.78 | Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring. ( Forst, T; Foteinos, G; He, YL; Kulmatycki, K; Mattapalli, D; Neelakantham, S; Taylor, A, 2013) |
"Patients of either gender with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), between 18 and 75 years old and requiring addition of a sulfonylurea to an ongoing regimen of oral antihyperglycemic agent(s), were enrolled." | 2.78 | Usage pattern, glycemic improvement, hypoglycemia, and body mass index changes with sulfonylureas in real-life clinical practice: results from OBSTACLE Hypoglycemia Study. ( Agrawal, N; Deepak, MC; Kalra, S; Narang, P; Singh, V; Uvaraj, MG, 2013) |
"Glimepiride treatment as initial mono-therapy could effectively improve blood glucose control in type 2 diabetic patients, with a favorable safety profile." | 2.78 | Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Duan, WR; Gao, Y; Guo, XH; Han, P; Lv, XF; Yang, HZ; Zhang, XZ, 2013) |
"Linagliptin treatment for 104 weeks was recently reported to achieve non-inferior glucose-lowering effects compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin." | 2.78 | Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years. ( Emser, A; Gallwitz, B; Rosenstock, J; von Eynatten, M; Woerle, HJ, 2013) |
"in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, the addition of sitagliptin or glimepiride led to similar improvement in glycaemic control after 30 weeks." | 2.76 | Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. ( Arechavaleta, R; Chen, Y; Duran, L; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Krobot, KJ; O'Neill, EA; Seck, T; Williams-Herman, D, 2011) |
" Insulin dosage in each group was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 100 mg/dL or less (2.73 | Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Busch, K; Janka, HU; Plewe, G, 2007) | |
" 47%) and drug-related adverse experiences (AEs) (15 vs." | 2.73 | Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. ( Fanurik, D; Hermansen, K; Khatami, H; Kipnes, M; Luo, E; Stein, P, 2007) |
"This study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of fixed-dose combination (FDC) rosiglitazone (RSG) plus glimepiride (GLIM) compared with RSG or GLIM monotherapy in drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)." | 2.73 | Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes. ( Chou, HS; Ferreira-Cornwell, C; Goldstein, BJ; Jones, AR; Krebs, J; Palmer, JP; Waterhouse, B, 2008) |
"Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim." | 2.72 | Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. ( Kann, PH; Medding, J; Moeller, J; Mokan, M; Mrevlje, F; Regulski, M; Szocs, A; Wascher, T; Zackova, V, 2006) |
" Insulin dosage was titrated to target FBG =100 mg/dl (both insulins) and predinner blood glucose =100 mg/dl (70/30 only) using a weekly forced-titration algorithm." | 2.71 | Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. ( Janka, HU; Kliebe-Frisch, C; Plewe, G; Riddle, MC; Schweitzer, MA; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2005) |
" A dosage of 70/30 insulin before supper was titrated, seeking fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) 120 mg/dl (6." | 2.69 | Beginning insulin treatment of obese patients with evening 70/30 insulin plus glimepiride versus insulin alone. Glimepiride Combination Group. ( Riddle, MC; Schneider, J, 1998) |
"The average glucose level at which hemiparesis developed was 1." | 2.48 | A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. ( Itoh, A; Itoh, H; Kawai, T; Meguro, S; Soeda, Y; Yoshino, T, 2012) |
"Glimepiride is a second-generation sulfonylurea that stimulates pancreatic β cells to release insulin." | 2.48 | Glimepiride: evidence-based facts, trends, and observations (GIFTS). [corrected]. ( Basit, A; Fawwad, A; Riaz, M, 2012) |
"In the treatment of elderly type 2 diabetes, it is important to detect hypoglycemia correctly, because the elderly patients often exhibit atypical symptoms from hypoglycemia." | 2.43 | [Knack of treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs in the elderly]. ( Hashizume, K; Komatsu, M, 2006) |
" All of the patients provided an extensive medial history which included information on concomitant medications, underlying diseases, and ongoing adverse events." | 2.39 | An overview of the safety and tolerance of glimepiride. ( Schneider, J, 1996) |
" Pharmacokinetic data on sulfonylureas are generally inconsistent in cirrhotic patients." | 2.39 | Pharmacokinetic basis for the safety of glimepiride in risk groups of NIDDM patients. ( Rosenkranz, B, 1996) |
" We compared the effects of three SU medications and initial SU doses on adverse glycemic and cardiovascular events among NH residents." | 1.91 | Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents. ( Berry, SD; Hayes, KN; Munshi, MN; Riester, MR; Zullo, AR, 2023) |
"Serious hypoglycemia is a major adverse event associated with insulin secretagogues." | 1.72 | Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Flory, JH; Hee Nam, Y; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE, 2022) |
"Glimepiride was also associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 0." | 1.56 | Comparative cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic safety of glimepiride in type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study. ( Dell'Aniello, S; Douros, A; Suissa, S; Yu, OHY, 2020) |
" We aimed to systematically screen for drugs that interact with the five most commonly used secretagogues-glipizide, glyburide, glimepiride, repaglinide, and nateglinide-to cause serious hypoglycemia." | 1.46 | Biomedical Informatics Approaches to Identifying Drug-Drug Interactions: Application to Insulin Secretagogues. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Chiang, C; Han, X; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE; Li, L, 2017) |
"The Cardiff Model was used to simulate disease progression and estimate the long-term effect of treatments on patients." | 1.42 | Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China. ( Deng, J; Dong, H; Gu, S; Mu, Y; Shi, L, 2015) |
"A 58 year-old woman with type 2 diabetes diagnosed 3 years before came to our clinic." | 1.40 | How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias. ( Mezquita Raya, P; Reyes García, R, 2014) |
"Glimepiride was detected at a concentration of 24." | 1.39 | [A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration]. ( Araki, E; Fujieda, N; Hazekawa, I, 2013) |
"Hypoglycemia was more likely to occur with glipizide ingestion than glyburide (odds ratio, 3." | 1.37 | Hypoglycemia after accidental pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions. ( Burns, BD; Levine, M; Lovecchio, F; Pizon, AF; Riley, BD; Ruha, AM; Thomas, SH, 2011) |
"Severe hypoglycemia was defined as a symptomatic event requiring treatment with intravenous glucose and was confirmed by a blood glucose measurement of < 50 mg/dl." | 1.36 | Severe sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia: a problem of uncritical prescription and deficiencies of diabetes care in geriatric patients. ( Hahn, M; Hammer, C; Holstein, A; Kovacs, P; Kulamadayil, NS, 2010) |
"A total of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were > or = 35 years old and who had been treated with metformin and a sulphonylurea for at least 6 months, completed questionnaires during their usual primary care office visit." | 1.35 | Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France. ( Krishnarajah, G; Lyu, R; Mavros, P; Vexiau, P; Yin, D, 2008) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 6 (5.66) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 34 (32.08) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 58 (54.72) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 8 (7.55) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Halder, M | 1 |
Bhatia, Y | 1 |
Singh, Y | 1 |
Zullo, AR | 2 |
Riester, MR | 2 |
Hayes, KN | 2 |
Munshi, MN | 2 |
Berry, SD | 2 |
Lim, S | 1 |
Sohn, M | 1 |
Florez, JC | 1 |
Nauck, MA | 1 |
Ahn, J | 1 |
Shrivastava, A | 1 |
Kesavadev, J | 2 |
Mohan, V | 1 |
Saboo, B | 1 |
Shrestha, D | 1 |
Maheshwari, A | 1 |
Makkar, BM | 1 |
Modi, KD | 1 |
Kumar Das, A | 1 |
Rosenstock, J | 6 |
Kolkailah, AA | 1 |
McGuire, DK | 1 |
Espeland, MA | 1 |
Mattheus, M | 1 |
Pfarr, E | 2 |
Lund, SS | 1 |
Marx, N | 1 |
Douros, A | 1 |
Dell'Aniello, S | 1 |
Yu, OHY | 1 |
Suissa, S | 1 |
Frias, JP | 1 |
Gonzalez-Galvez, G | 1 |
Johnsson, E | 1 |
Maaske, J | 1 |
Testa, MA | 2 |
Simonson, DC | 1 |
Dronamraju, N | 1 |
Garcia-Sanchez, R | 1 |
Peters, AL | 1 |
Hee Nam, Y | 1 |
Brensinger, CM | 4 |
Bilker, WB | 4 |
Flory, JH | 3 |
Leonard, CE | 4 |
Hennessy, S | 4 |
Kim, G | 1 |
Oh, S | 1 |
Jin, SM | 1 |
Hur, KY | 1 |
Kim, JH | 1 |
Lee, MK | 1 |
Chon, S | 2 |
Rhee, SY | 1 |
Ahn, KJ | 1 |
Baik, SH | 1 |
Park, Y | 1 |
Nam, MS | 1 |
Lee, KW | 1 |
Yoo, SJ | 1 |
Koh, G | 1 |
Lee, DH | 1 |
Kim, YS | 1 |
Woo, JT | 1 |
Aquilante, CL | 1 |
Boudreau, DM | 1 |
Deo, R | 1 |
Gagne, JJ | 2 |
Mangaali, MJ | 1 |
Fujimoto, K | 1 |
Shibayama, Y | 1 |
Yamaguchi, E | 1 |
Honjo, S | 1 |
Hamasaki, A | 1 |
Hamamoto, Y | 1 |
Chen, YH | 1 |
Huang, CN | 1 |
Cho, YM | 1 |
Li, P | 1 |
Gu, L | 1 |
Wang, F | 1 |
Yang, J | 1 |
Wang, WQ | 1 |
Ridderstråle, M | 1 |
Andersen, KR | 1 |
Woerle, HJ | 5 |
Salsali, A | 1 |
Gu, T | 1 |
Ma, J | 2 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Zhu, L | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Xu, L | 1 |
Cheng, J | 1 |
Shi, B | 1 |
Li, D | 1 |
Shao, J | 1 |
Sun, Z | 1 |
Zhong, S | 1 |
Bi, Y | 1 |
Zhu, D | 1 |
Gallo, S | 1 |
Charbonnel, B | 1 |
Goldman, A | 1 |
Shi, H | 1 |
Huyck, S | 1 |
Darekar, A | 1 |
Lauring, B | 1 |
Terra, SG | 1 |
Gallwitz, B | 4 |
Emser, A | 1 |
von Eynatten, M | 4 |
Bader, G | 1 |
Geransar, P | 1 |
Schweizer, A | 1 |
Boglou, P | 1 |
Steiropoulos, P | 1 |
Papanas, N | 1 |
Bouros, D | 1 |
He, YL | 1 |
Foteinos, G | 1 |
Neelakantham, S | 1 |
Mattapalli, D | 1 |
Kulmatycki, K | 1 |
Forst, T | 1 |
Taylor, A | 1 |
Fujieda, N | 1 |
Hazekawa, I | 1 |
Araki, E | 1 |
Riddle, MC | 4 |
Vlajnic, A | 1 |
Gao, L | 1 |
Kadowaki, T | 1 |
Kondo, K | 1 |
Moon, JS | 1 |
Ha, KS | 1 |
Yoon, JS | 1 |
Lee, HW | 1 |
Lee, HC | 1 |
Won, KC | 1 |
Kobayashi, K | 1 |
Yokoh, H | 1 |
Sato, Y | 1 |
Takemoto, M | 1 |
Uchida, D | 1 |
Kanatsuka, A | 1 |
Kuribayashi, N | 1 |
Terano, T | 1 |
Hashimoto, N | 1 |
Sakurai, K | 1 |
Hanaoka, H | 1 |
Ishikawa, K | 1 |
Onishi, S | 1 |
Yokote, K | 1 |
Reyes García, R | 1 |
Mezquita Raya, P | 1 |
Park, CY | 1 |
Kang, JG | 1 |
Noh, J | 1 |
Oh, SJ | 1 |
Lee, CB | 1 |
Park, SW | 1 |
Yang, W | 1 |
Xing, X | 1 |
Lv, X | 1 |
Li, Y | 1 |
Yuan, G | 1 |
Sun, F | 1 |
Wang, W | 1 |
Woloschak, M | 1 |
Lukashevich, V | 1 |
Kozlovski, P | 1 |
Kothny, W | 1 |
Derosa, G | 2 |
Bonaventura, A | 1 |
Bianchi, L | 1 |
Romano, D | 1 |
Fogari, E | 2 |
D'Angelo, A | 1 |
Maffioli, P | 1 |
Østoft, SH | 1 |
Bagger, JI | 1 |
Hansen, T | 1 |
Pedersen, O | 1 |
Faber, J | 1 |
Holst, JJ | 1 |
Knop, FK | 1 |
Vilsbøll, T | 1 |
Home, PD | 1 |
Bolli, GB | 1 |
Mathieu, C | 1 |
Deerochanawong, C | 1 |
Landgraf, W | 1 |
Candelas, C | 1 |
Pilorget, V | 1 |
Dain, MP | 1 |
Leiter, LA | 1 |
Yoon, KH | 1 |
Arias, P | 1 |
Langslet, G | 2 |
Xie, J | 1 |
Balis, DA | 1 |
Millington, D | 1 |
Vercruysse, F | 1 |
Canovatchel, W | 1 |
Meininger, G | 2 |
Patel, S | 3 |
Hehnke, U | 2 |
Mehlburger, L | 1 |
Dugi, KA | 1 |
Laakso, M | 1 |
Groop, PH | 1 |
Barnett, AH | 2 |
Tamminen, I | 1 |
Schernthaner, G | 3 |
Durán-Garcia, S | 1 |
Hanefeld, M | 1 |
Niskanen, L | 1 |
Östgren, CJ | 1 |
Malvolti, E | 1 |
Hardy, E | 1 |
Joy, NG | 1 |
Tate, DB | 1 |
Davis, SN | 1 |
Rosas-Guzmán, J | 1 |
Dotta, F | 1 |
Guerci, B | 1 |
Simó, R | 1 |
Festa, A | 1 |
Kiljański, J | 1 |
Zhou, M | 1 |
Amin, NB | 1 |
Aggarwal, N | 1 |
Pall, D | 1 |
Paragh, G | 1 |
Denney, WS | 1 |
Le, V | 1 |
Riggs, M | 1 |
Calle, RA | 1 |
Gu, S | 1 |
Deng, J | 1 |
Shi, L | 1 |
Mu, Y | 1 |
Dong, H | 1 |
Hartley, P | 1 |
Shentu, Y | 1 |
Betz-Schiff, P | 1 |
Golm, GT | 1 |
Sisk, CM | 1 |
Engel, SS | 1 |
Shankar, RR | 1 |
Giorgino, F | 1 |
Benroubi, M | 1 |
Sun, JH | 1 |
Zimmermann, AG | 1 |
Pechtner, V | 1 |
Chirila, C | 1 |
Zheng, Q | 1 |
Davenport, E | 1 |
Kaschinski, D | 1 |
Hach, T | 1 |
Palencia, R | 1 |
Han, X | 2 |
Flockhart, DA | 1 |
Cardillo, S | 1 |
Wolpaw, AJ | 1 |
Trella, JD | 1 |
Egan, MA | 1 |
Delgado, EM | 1 |
Romley, JA | 1 |
Gong, C | 1 |
Jena, AB | 1 |
Goldman, DP | 1 |
Williams, B | 1 |
Peters, A | 1 |
Pettus, J | 1 |
McNabb, B | 1 |
Eckel, RH | 1 |
Skyler, JS | 1 |
Dhalla, A | 1 |
Guan, S | 1 |
Jochelson, P | 1 |
Belardinelli, L | 1 |
Henry, RH | 1 |
Dungan, KM | 1 |
Weitgasser, R | 1 |
Perez Manghi, F | 1 |
Pintilei, E | 1 |
Fahrbach, JL | 1 |
Jiang, HH | 1 |
Shell, J | 1 |
Robertson, KE | 1 |
Seino, Y | 2 |
Kuwata, H | 1 |
Yabe, D | 2 |
Patel, CA | 1 |
Bailey, RA | 1 |
Vijapurkar, U | 1 |
Blonde, L | 2 |
van Dijk, P | 1 |
Bouma, A | 1 |
Landman, GW | 1 |
Groenier, KH | 1 |
Bilo, H | 1 |
Kleefstra, N | 1 |
van Hateren, KJ | 1 |
Perl, S | 1 |
Cook, W | 1 |
Wei, C | 1 |
Ohman, P | 1 |
Hirshberg, B | 1 |
Chiang, C | 1 |
Li, L | 1 |
Terauchi, Y | 1 |
Yamada, Y | 1 |
Ishida, H | 1 |
Ohsugi, M | 1 |
Kitaoka, M | 1 |
Satoh, J | 2 |
Shihara, N | 1 |
Tayek, J | 1 |
Arnolds, S | 1 |
Rave, K | 1 |
Salti, I | 1 |
Böhm, R | 1 |
Cascorbi, I | 1 |
Herdegen, T | 1 |
Yates, C | 1 |
Neoh, S | 1 |
Konpa, A | 1 |
Fullinfaw, R | 1 |
Colman, P | 1 |
Hermansen, K | 2 |
Kolotkin, RL | 1 |
Hammer, M | 2 |
Zdravkovic, M | 1 |
Matthews, D | 1 |
Holstein, A | 5 |
Hammer, C | 3 |
Hahn, M | 1 |
Kulamadayil, NS | 1 |
Kovacs, P | 1 |
Bode, BW | 1 |
Magwire, M | 1 |
Hale, PM | 1 |
Garber, A | 1 |
Matthews, DR | 1 |
Dejager, S | 1 |
Ahren, B | 1 |
Fonseca, V | 1 |
Ferrannini, E | 1 |
Couturier, A | 1 |
Foley, JE | 1 |
Zinman, B | 1 |
Arechavaleta, R | 1 |
Seck, T | 1 |
Chen, Y | 1 |
Krobot, KJ | 1 |
O'Neill, EA | 1 |
Duran, L | 1 |
Kaufman, KD | 1 |
Williams-Herman, D | 1 |
Goldstein, BJ | 2 |
Fujita, Y | 1 |
Honma, H | 1 |
Fujino, Y | 1 |
Onodera, M | 1 |
Inoue, Y | 1 |
Endo, S | 1 |
Levine, M | 1 |
Ruha, AM | 1 |
Lovecchio, F | 1 |
Riley, BD | 1 |
Pizon, AF | 1 |
Burns, BD | 1 |
Thomas, SH | 1 |
Yoshino, T | 1 |
Meguro, S | 1 |
Soeda, Y | 1 |
Itoh, A | 1 |
Kawai, T | 1 |
Itoh, H | 1 |
Ragia, G | 1 |
Tavridou, A | 1 |
Petridis, I | 1 |
Manolopoulos, VG | 1 |
Harper, R | 1 |
Toorawa, R | 1 |
Thiemann, S | 1 |
Basit, A | 2 |
Riaz, M | 1 |
Fawwad, A | 1 |
Kalra, S | 1 |
Deepak, MC | 1 |
Narang, P | 1 |
Singh, V | 1 |
Uvaraj, MG | 1 |
Agrawal, N | 1 |
Guo, XH | 1 |
Lv, XF | 1 |
Han, P | 1 |
Zhang, XZ | 1 |
Yang, HZ | 1 |
Duan, WR | 1 |
Gao, Y | 1 |
Plaschke, A | 4 |
Egberts, EH | 4 |
Fritsche, A | 1 |
Schweitzer, MA | 3 |
Häring, HU | 1 |
Earle, KE | 1 |
Rushakoff, RJ | 1 |
Goldfine, ID | 1 |
Skugor, M | 1 |
Siraj, ES | 1 |
Ptak, M | 3 |
Kuhn, J | 1 |
Kratzsch, C | 1 |
Diekmann, J | 1 |
Kleesiek, K | 1 |
Maurer, HH | 2 |
Veitch, PC | 1 |
Clifton-Bligh, RJ | 1 |
Tenberken, O | 1 |
Grimaldi, A | 1 |
Di Mario, U | 1 |
Drzewoski, J | 1 |
Kempler, P | 1 |
Kvapil, M | 1 |
Novials, A | 1 |
Rottiers, R | 1 |
Rutten, GE | 1 |
Shaw, KM | 1 |
Janka, HU | 2 |
Plewe, G | 2 |
Kliebe-Frisch, C | 1 |
Yki-Järvinen, H | 1 |
Standl, E | 2 |
Maxeiner, S | 2 |
Raptis, S | 2 |
Karimi-Anderesi, Z | 1 |
Charpentier, G | 1 |
Fleury, F | 1 |
Dubroca, I | 1 |
Vaur, L | 1 |
Clerson, P | 1 |
El-Din, J | 1 |
Brockmöller, J | 1 |
Kirchheiner, J | 1 |
Dailey, G | 1 |
Szoke, E | 1 |
Gosmanov, NR | 1 |
Sinkin, JC | 1 |
Nihalani, A | 1 |
Fender, AB | 1 |
Cryer, PE | 1 |
Meyer, C | 1 |
Gerich, JE | 1 |
Zargar, A | 1 |
Mahtab, H | 1 |
Komatsu, M | 1 |
Hashizume, K | 1 |
Gaddi, AV | 1 |
Piccinni, MN | 1 |
Salvadeo, S | 1 |
Ciccarelli, L | 1 |
Ghelfi, M | 1 |
Ferrari, I | 1 |
Cicero, AF | 1 |
Eliaschewitz, FG | 1 |
Calvo, C | 1 |
Valbuena, H | 1 |
Ruiz, M | 1 |
Aschner, P | 1 |
Villena, J | 1 |
Ramirez, LA | 1 |
Jimenez, J | 1 |
Pan, CY | 1 |
Sinnassamy, P | 1 |
Chung, KD | 1 |
Kim, KW | 1 |
Kann, PH | 1 |
Wascher, T | 1 |
Zackova, V | 1 |
Moeller, J | 1 |
Medding, J | 1 |
Szocs, A | 1 |
Mokan, M | 1 |
Mrevlje, F | 1 |
Regulski, M | 1 |
Busch, K | 1 |
Rasheed, SA | 1 |
Kipnes, M | 1 |
Luo, E | 1 |
Fanurik, D | 1 |
Khatami, H | 1 |
Stein, P | 1 |
Chou, HS | 1 |
Palmer, JP | 1 |
Jones, AR | 1 |
Waterhouse, B | 1 |
Ferreira-Cornwell, C | 1 |
Krebs, J | 1 |
Schiel, R | 1 |
Müller, UA | 1 |
Vexiau, P | 1 |
Mavros, P | 1 |
Krishnarajah, G | 1 |
Lyu, R | 1 |
Yin, D | 1 |
Schneider, J | 3 |
Dills, DG | 1 |
Rosenkranz, B | 1 |
Massi-Benedetti, M | 1 |
Herz, M | 1 |
Pfeiffer, C | 1 |
Blicklé, JF | 1 |
Andres, E | 1 |
Neyrolles, N | 1 |
Brogard, JM | 1 |
Balaguer Santamaría, JA | 1 |
Feliu Rovira, A | 1 |
Escribano Subias, J | 1 |
Salvadó Juncosa, O | 1 |
Sardá Auré, P | 1 |
Gussinyé Canadell, M | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A 52-week International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3bTrial With a Blinded 104-week Long -Term Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin in C[NCT02419612] | Phase 3 | 444 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-08-14 | Completed | ||
The Effect of Vildagliptin Based Treatment Versus Sulfonylurea on Glycemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, GLP-1, and Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01404676] | Phase 4 | 34 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin and Glimepiride in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Controlled Inadequately With Metformin Monotherapy (SPECIFY Study) : a 48-week, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Trial[NCT02280486] | Phase 4 | 388 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 26-Week Multicenter Study With a 78-Week Extension To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Ertugliflozin In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Inadequate Glycemic Control On Metformin Monothe[NCT02033889] | Phase 3 | 621 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-12-13 | Completed | ||
A Randomised Double-blind, Active-controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 ( 5.0 mg, Administered Orally Once Daily) Compared to Glimepiride Over Two Years in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control Despite Metfo[NCT00622284] | Phase 3 | 1,560 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-02-29 | Completed | ||
Pilot Study to Assess the Difference in Glycemic Profiles Between Vildagliptin and Glimepiride Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device[NCT01262586] | Phase 3 | 24 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-11-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomised Controlled Trial for People With Established Type 2 Diabetes During Ramadan: Canagliflozin (Invokana™) vs. Standard Dual Therapy Regimen: The 'Can Do Ramadan' Study[NCT02694263] | Phase 4 | 25 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Study of MP-513 in Combination With Thiazolidinedione in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01026194] | Phase 3 | 204 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-12-31 | Completed | ||
A Phase III Study of MP-513 in Combination With Sulfonylurea in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00974090] | Phase 3 | 194 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase IIb, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multi-center, Dose-finding Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of MP-513 When Added to Ongoing Metformin Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, With an Open Label Extension[NCT00971243] | Phase 2 | 448 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-08-31 | Completed | ||
Lantus vs Sulfonylurea as add-on Therapy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Failing Metformin Monotherapy: Comparison of Effects on Beta Cell Function and Metabolic Profile.[NCT00562172] | Phase 4 | 75 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-09-30 | Completed | ||
Insulin Glargine Combined With Sulfonylurea Versus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.[NCT00708578] | Phase 4 | 99 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Effect of 24 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin 50mg qd to Placebo as add-on Therapy to Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Sulfonylurea Mono[NCT01357252] | Phase 3 | 279 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-04-30 | Completed | ||
Phase 2 Study: A Double-blind, Randomised, Clinical Cross-over Trial to Investigate the Treatment Potential of Liraglutide Compared to Glimepiride in MODY Patients[NCT01610934] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 15 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-08-31 | Completed | ||
Superiority of Insulin Glargine Lantus vs. NPH: Treat to Normoglycemia Concept.Effect of Insulin Glargine in Comparison to Insulin NPH in Insulin-nave People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With at Least One OAD and Not Adequately Controlled[NCT00949442] | Phase 4 | 708 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812] | Phase 3 | 1,452 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-09-30 | Completed | ||
A 52-Week, Randomised, Double Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase IIIb/IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Contr[NCT01006603] | Phase 4 | 957 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-10-31 | Completed | ||
Long Term Treatment With Exenatide Versus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin (EUREXA: European Exenatide Study)[NCT00359762] | Phase 3 | 1,029 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Glimepiride In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin[NCT01517373] | Phase 2 | 304 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-02-29 | Completed | ||
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Sitagliptin On Glycemic Control In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Met[NCT01475461] | Phase 2 | 345 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2011-11-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Sitagliptin Compared With Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control[NCT01189890] | Phase 3 | 480 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-16 | Completed | ||
Effect of Dulaglutide on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03590626] | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2019-01-01 | Completed | |||
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Noninferiority Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Glimepiride[NCT01075282] | Phase 3 | 810 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-02-28 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in Elderly Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01183104] | 305 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-31 | Completed | |||
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723] | Phase 3 | 746 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power) | ||
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin Compared With the Addition of Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin[NCT00701090] | Phase 3 | 1,035 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomised, db, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 (5mg), Administered Orally Once Daily for 18 Weeks Followed by a 34 Week Double-blind Extension Period (Placebo Patients Switched to Glimepiride) in Type 2 Diabetic [NCT00740051] | Phase 3 | 227 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-08-31 | Completed | ||
Prospective Observational Study to Assess Correlation Between Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Sulfonylurea[NCT00907881] | 1,069 participants (Actual) | Observational | 2009-08-31 | Completed | |||
Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride as Oral Anti-Diabetic (OAD) Initiation Mono- Therapy in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)[NCT00908921] | Phase 4 | 391 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-04-30 | Completed | ||
Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients With Insulin Resistance: A 6 Month Comparison of Insulin Glargine and NPH Insulin[NCT01854723] | Phase 4 | 0 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-04-30 | Withdrawn | ||
Bedtime Insulin Glargine or Bedtime Neutral Protamine Lispro Combined With Sulfonylurea and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes. A Randomized, Controlled Trial[NCT00641407] | Phase 4 | 100 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2007-01-31 | Completed | ||
Phase 4 Study of Comparison of Combination Therapy of Gliclazide MR and Basal Insulin With Pre-mix Insulin Monotherapy for the Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00736515] | Phase 4 | 160 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-10-31 | Completed | ||
Open Label Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Insulin Glargine Ezelin vs Lantus in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients[NCT03352674] | Phase 2 | 133 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-09-30 | Completed | ||
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Plus Metformin With Insulin Glargine Plus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00619697] | Phase 4 | 260 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-12-31 | Completed | ||
Efficacy of Ipragliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes With Sulfonylurea and Metformin[NCT03076112] | Phase 3 | 170 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2017-04-25 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Glimepiride Alone or in Combination With Metf[NCT00106704] | Phase 3 | 441 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-03-31 | Completed | ||
Effect of Oral Combination Therapy of Metformin Extended Release Over Glimepiride in a Single Dosage Form in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Failure of Monotherapy[NCT00941161] | Phase 4 | 28 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2009-02-28 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
To examine whether the mean change from baseline in HbA1c with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | % HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | -1.35 |
Titrated Glimepiride | -0.98 |
To examine whether the change from baseline in SBP with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | -2.6 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 1.0 |
To examine whether the mean change from baseline in total body weight with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | -3.11 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 0.95 |
Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 156 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 156
Intervention | Percentage of Subjects (Number) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | 21.4 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 11.7 |
Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 52 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of subjects (Number) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | 44.3 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 34.3 |
Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 156-week treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156
Intervention | Percentage of Subjects (Number) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | 37.0 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 55.6 |
Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after the 52-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 52 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 52-week short -term treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of Subjects (Number) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | 1.3 |
Titrated Glimepiride | 8.8 |
Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. Time to treatment intensification curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg | NA |
Titrated Glimepiride | 92.3 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 104 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent A1C (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.58 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.60 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.89 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent A1C (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.03 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.73 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.91 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 52 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent A1C (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.68 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.72 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.96 |
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 104 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.18 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -3.77 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -3.63 |
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -1.33 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -3.01 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -2.93 |
The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 52 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.07 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -3.23 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -3.35 |
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 104 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 104 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -10.9 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -18.2 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -28.2 |
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.85 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -27.54 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -39.10 |
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 52 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 52 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -12.0 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -22.4 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -35.2 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.46 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -2.36 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -1.52 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.23 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -1.59 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -2.19 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.38 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -1.40 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -1.19 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.05 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -3.61 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -3.13 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.70 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -4.38 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -5.20 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.65 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -2.63 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -4.28 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -1.23 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -1.11 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.96 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.09 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.19 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.13 |
BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -1.18 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -1.72 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -2.02 |
BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.06 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.15 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.13 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.40 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.10 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 0.30 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percentage change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.22 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.01 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 0.12 |
BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.63 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.55 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.36 |
BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.44 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.59 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.39 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.69 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.49 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.44 |
BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.10 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.28 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 0.07 |
BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.82 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -1.04 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -1.32 |
CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 10.8 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 51.9 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 80.2 |
CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 19.29 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 26.94 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 32.53 |
CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 15.54 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 34.36 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 41.57 |
P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 19.38 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 10.11 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 24.21 |
P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent Change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 24.50 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 8.41 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 19.79 |
PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.98 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 0.28 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 0.14 |
P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.5 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 0.8 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 0.5 |
PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 10.12 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 8.16 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 5.46 |
PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percent Change (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 8.11 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 11.09 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 2.48 |
BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | -0.58 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | -0.40 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | -0.64 |
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 2.4 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 3.4 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 3.9 |
An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 106
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 77.5 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 70.5 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 75.6 |
Per protocol participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 24.4 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 11.1 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 10.7 |
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 17.7 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 2.9 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 1.5 |
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 17.2 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 4.3 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 1.5 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 7.2 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 10.6 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 12.2 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 2.9 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 8.7 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 12.2 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 11.0 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 10.6 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 14.6 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 19.1 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 24.6 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 33.7 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 15.8 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 35.3 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 40.0 |
A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 30.6 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 34.8 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 36.6 |
Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Days (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo/Glimepiride | 105 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 112 |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 139 |
Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at approximately 24 hours following the prior day's dose and before administration of the current day's dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.500 mg/mL. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and/or 60 minutes post-dose on Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 30
Intervention | ng/mL (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Week 6:Pre-dose | Week 12:Pre-dose | Week 12:60 mins post-dose | Week 18:Pre-dose | Week 18:60 mins post-dose | Week 30:Pre-dose | |
Ertugliflozin 15 mg | 38.38 | 29.23 | 228.13 | 24.46 | 214.96 | 30.55 |
Ertugliflozin 5 mg | 14.89 | 12.34 | 74.84 | 9.91 | 74.39 | 12.66 |
Placebo/Glimepiride | NA | NA | NA | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.15 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 2 hr PPG minus the Baseline 2hr PPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline 2hr PPG and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -28.47 |
Glimepiride | -18.72 |
This key secondary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 104 body weight minus the baseline body weight. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline weight and the number of previous antidiabetic-medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -1.39 |
Glimepiride | 1.29 |
This key secondary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 52 body weight minus the baseline body weight. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline weight and the number of previous antidiabetic-medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52
Intervention | kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -1.12 |
Glimepiride | 1.38 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 0 |
Glimepiride | 1 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 1 |
Glimepiride | 0 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 1 |
Glimepiride | 3 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -11 |
Glimepiride | -7 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 FPG minus the Baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -2.34 |
Glimepiride | -8.72 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 FPG minus the Baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -8.40 |
Glimepiride | -15.24 |
The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all treated and randomized patients with a baseline and at least one on-treatment HbA1c measurement available during the first phase of the study. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as imputation rule. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.21 |
Glimepiride | -0.41 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.43 |
Glimepiride | -0.75 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.45 |
Glimepiride | -0.78 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 28
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.43 |
Glimepiride | -0.74 |
Difference of base percent value [Week x(%) - baseline (%)] (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.26 |
Glimepiride | -0.33 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 40
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.42 |
Glimepiride | -0.69 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.41 |
Glimepiride | -0.63 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 65
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.32 |
Glimepiride | -0.53 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 78
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.22 |
Glimepiride | -0.43 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.37 |
Glimepiride | -0.58 |
(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 91
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.21 |
Glimepiride | -0.43 |
This co-primary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 104 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.16 |
Glimepiride | -0.36 |
This co-primary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 52 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52
Intervention | Percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | -0.36 |
Glimepiride | -0.57 |
A hypoglycaemic event is defined as patient showing clinical signs suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by a HBGM of below 55 mg/dl (3.1 mmol/L) (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 58 |
Glimepiride | 280 |
A hypoglycaemic event is defined as patient showing clinical signs suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by a home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM) of below 55 mg/dl (3.1 mmol/L) (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 41 |
Glimepiride | 249 |
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 104, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 6.5%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 104 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 6.5%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 10.9 |
Glimepiride | 14.7 |
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 52, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 6.5%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 52 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 6.5%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 16.9 |
Glimepiride | 22.7 |
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7.0% at week 104, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 104 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 7.0%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 21.0 |
Glimepiride | 28.3 |
The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7.0% at week 52, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 52 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 7.0%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 29.6 |
Glimepiride | 38.9 |
Occurrence of relative efficacy response, defined as a lowering of 0.5% HbA1c at week 104 (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Linagliptin | 26.2 |
Glimepiride | 33.5 |
The change from Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg / dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Teneli + Pio | -5.6 |
Teneli/Teneli + Pio | -56.9 |
The change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg / dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Teneli + Pio | -4.5 |
Teneli/Teneli + Pio | -21.0 |
The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | Percent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Teneli + Pio | -0.20 |
Teneli/Teneli + Pio | -0.94 |
The change from Baseline in AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours post-dose at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg*h / dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Teneli + Pio | -13.722 |
Teneli/Teneli + Pio | -85.031 |
The change from Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg / dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo / Teneli + SU | 6.0 |
Teneli / Teneli + SU | -43.1 |
The change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg / dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo / Teneli + SU | 9.8 |
Teneli / Teneli + SU | -17.3 |
The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | percentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo / Teneli + SU | 0.29 |
Teneli / Teneli + SU | -0.71 |
The change from Baseline in AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours post-dose at Week 0 and Week 12
Intervention | mg・hr/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo / Teneli + SU | 15.514 |
Teneli / Teneli + SU | -65.544 |
Change in FPG from baseline to Week 24 or LOCF was assessed with an ANCOVA approach similar to that of the primary efficacy endpoint. (NCT00971243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Teneli 5mg+Met | -15.54 |
Teneli 10mg+Met | -13.65 |
Teneli 20mg+Met | -17.84 |
Teneli 40mg+Met | -21.85 |
Placebo+Met | -3.51 |
The change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 or a last observation carried forward (LOCF), was assessed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, with the centre and treatment effect as factors and the baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT00971243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24
Intervention | percentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Teneli 5mg+Met | -0.58 |
Teneli 10mg+Met | -0.68 |
Teneli 20mg+Met | -0.76 |
Teneli 40mg+Met | -0.91 |
Placebo+Met | -0.28 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.65 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.74 |
Glimepiride | -0.55 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.82 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.93 |
Glimepiride | -0.81 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -4.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.7 |
Glimepiride | 1.0 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 5.6 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 4.9 |
Glimepiride | 34.2 |
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date)and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma glucose value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52
Intervention | mmol/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | -0.73 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | -1.29 |
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), and the last pre-randomisation HbA1c value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.
Intervention | % of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | -0.44 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | -0.64 |
Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date) and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma insulin value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52
Intervention | µU/mL (Mean) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | -2.0 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | -0.6 |
β-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model. Value is derived from FPG and fasting insulin; fasting insulin values below 2.074 μU/mL or above 57.595 μU/mL and FPG values below 3 mmol/L or above 25 mmol/L are excluded (as restricted by the calculation method used). Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52
Intervention | percentage of change from baseline (Mean) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | 3.83 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | 16.22 |
Proportion of patients with their last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), as determined by central laboratory, below the specified limits. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52
Intervention | percentage of responders (Number) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | 44.7 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | 54.7 |
"Hypoglyceamic event defined as, Confirmed hypoglycaemia: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Safety analysis set." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.
Intervention | percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Saxagliptin 5 mg | 1.1 |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | 15.3 |
"Defined as obtained on or before the 8th day after the last dosing day, as determined by central laboratory. Safety analysis set.~Confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia defined as: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
All patients | patients aged <75 years (n=217, n=216) | patients aged ≥75 years (n=142, n=143) | |
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg | 38.2 | 33.3 | 45.5 |
Saxagliptin 5 mg | 37.9 | 39.2 | 35.9 |
Change in Body weight from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | -3.92 |
Glim + Met | 1.47 |
Change in DI30/DG30 ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 12.10 |
Glim + Met | 0.91 |
Change in disposition index from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 9.15 |
Glim + Met | 1.82 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | -0.87 |
Glim + Met | -0.41 |
Change in fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 0.03 |
Glim + Met | 0.05 |
Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint. Endpoint for HbA1c was defined as the HbA1c measured at the treatment failure for patients reaching primary endpoint and was the last observation in study period II for other patients (either followed until the end of the study period II or discontinuing the study). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | percentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | -0.36 |
Glim + Met | -0.21 |
Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III
Intervention | percentage of total hemoglobin (Mean) |
---|---|
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized | -0.47 |
Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III
Intervention | percentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met + Glim - Randomized | -0.19 |
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized | -0.47 |
Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | percentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | -0.30 |
Glim + Met | -0.12 |
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 5.56 |
Glim + Met | 19.92 |
Change from baseline in postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | -2.72 |
Glim + Met | -0.53 |
Diastolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 77.45 |
Glim + Met | 79.16 |
Disposition Index at Year 3. Disposition index was calculated as (DI30/DG30 ratio)/(HOMA index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)); where HOMA-IR=(fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L) x fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L))/(22.5 x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 12.56 |
Glim + Met | 7.89 |
Fasting plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 7.27 |
Glim + Met | 7.96 |
Fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 0.22 |
Glim + Met | 0.23 |
Heart rate at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | beats per minute (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 73.51 |
Glim + Met | 74.23 |
HDL Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 1.31 |
Glim + Met | 1.25 |
HOMA-B at Year 3. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated as: HOMA-B = (20 x fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L))/((fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L) - 3.5) x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 66.86 |
Glim + Met | 68.52 |
All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | events per subject-year (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 1.52 |
Glim + Met | 5.32 |
All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Start of Period III to end of study
Intervention | events per subject-year (Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Metformin + Glim - Randomized | 2.78 |
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized | 0.60 |
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized | 4.62 |
Postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 12.65 |
Glim + Met | 15.45 |
DI30/DG30 at Year 3. DI30/DG30 ratio was calculated as (30 minute post prandial insulin - fasting insulin) (measured in pmol/L)/(30 minute post prandial glucose - fasting glucose) (measured in mmol/L). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | ratio (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 25.81 |
Glim + Met | 26.38 |
Systolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 130.58 |
Glim + Met | 135.78 |
Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | week (Median) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 180.0 |
Glim + Met | 142.1 |
Total Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 4.77 |
Glim + Met | 4.75 |
Triglycerides at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Exen + Met | 1.69 |
Glim + Met | 1.95 |
Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)
Intervention | number of patients (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Number of patients with treatment failure | Number of patients censored | |
Exen + Met | 203 | 287 |
Glim + Met | 262 | 225 |
A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median of 1 and 2 events per participant was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | events per participant (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 0 |
Glimepiride | 0 |
Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 56 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 52 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 56 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 54 |
Glimepiride | 51 |
A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE was defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.9 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 3.3 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 4.9 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 6.6 |
Glimepiride | 34.4 |
(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14 (follow-up)
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Mean) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60) | Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58) | Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60) | Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56) | Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56) | Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54) | Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53) | |
Glimepiride | 90.388 | -0.024 | 0.310 | 0.473 | 0.493 | 1.211 | 1.234 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 89.518 | -0.069 | -0.378 | -0.604 | -0.522 | -0.685 | -0.472 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 87.530 | -0.021 | -0.284 | -0.290 | -0.397 | -0.545 | -0.573 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 89.860 | -0.028 | -0.074 | -0.228 | -0.311 | -0.961 | -0.978 |
Placebo | 89.859 | -0.402 | -0.620 | -0.564 | -1.082 | -1.529 | -1.478 |
(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12
Intervention | milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61) | Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59) | Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60) | Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57) | Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57) | Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55) | |
Glimepiride | 163.7 | -19.9 | -26.2 | -23.4 | -26.9 | -22.5 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 168.7 | -2.0 | -8.4 | -6.9 | -7.0 | -6.2 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 160.4 | -10.5 | -11.4 | -10.4 | -13.0 | -10.3 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 174.7 | -7.9 | -7.7 | -7.2 | -13.0 | -9.9 |
Placebo | 161.3 | 3.1 | -0.5 | -2.6 | 0.9 | 3.4 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12
Intervention | percentage of hemoglobin (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60) | Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54) | |
Glimepiride | 8.12 | -1.01 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 7.97 | -0.18 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 7.88 | -0.64 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 7.91 | -0.45 |
Placebo | 7.90 | -0.13 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8
Intervention | percentage of hemoglobin (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60) | Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55) | Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55) | |
Glimepiride | -0.54 | -0.78 | -0.89 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | -0.07 | -0.14 | -0.17 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | -0.32 | -0.51 | -0.59 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | -0.22 | -0.22 | -0.38 |
Placebo | -0.08 | -0.14 | -0.19 |
Participants who met the criteria for increase from baseline in ECG data were reported. Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline value was >200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline value was <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]); QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >= 30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50% | QRS interval: Percent change of >=50% | QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec | QTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec | |
Glimepiride | 0 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 0 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 0 | 2 | 6 | 2 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 1 | 1 | 8 | 2 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 6 | 2 |
Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg) | Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg) | Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg) | Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg) | |
Glimepiride | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 3 | 0 | 3 | 2 |
Placebo | 2 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 101 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Glimepiride | 36 | 1 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 28 | 1 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 29 | 1 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 31 | 2 |
Placebo | 26 | 0 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of less than 6.5 percent and less than 7 percent. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
Less Than 6.5 Percent | Less Than 7 Percent | |
Glimepiride | 18.2 | 45.5 |
PF-04937319 10 mg | 13 | 31.5 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 27.3 | 52.7 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 18.5 | 27.8 |
Placebo | 7.0 | 26.3 |
A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median number of events per participant was reported (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | events per participant (Median) |
---|---|
Metformin 500 mg | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 0 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 0 |
Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal[LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 46 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 49 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 45 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 46 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 53 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 43 |
A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE is defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Metformin 500 mg | 0 |
Placebo | 0 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 1 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 0 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 2 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 1 |
(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8 , 12 , 14
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55) | Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55) | Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53) | Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52) | Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53) | Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53) | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 91.239 | -0.053 | -0.374 | -0.475 | -0.623 | -0.916 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 88.371 | -0.052 | -0.192 | -0.510 | -0.455 | -0.613 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 87.865 | 0.435 | 0.214 | -0.003 | -0.142 | 0.011 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 88.066 | -0.283 | -0.203 | -0.270 | -0.352 | -0.492 |
Placebo | 86.446 | -0.239 | -0.704 | -0.823 | -0.804 | -0.588 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 87.025 | -0.384 | -0.353 | -0.702 | -0.917 | -1.172 |
(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14
Intervention | milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55) | Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55) | Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53) | Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52) | Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53) | Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53) | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 164.8 | -10.8 | -9.6 | -6.5 | 3.5 | 10.2 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 155.1 | -3.2 | -0.2 | -2.5 | -3.8 | -3.1 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 159.8 | 0.7 | -0.3 | 0.7 | -2.5 | -3.5 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 166.1 | -6.8 | -8.3 | -15.2 | -10.8 | -1.0 |
Placebo | 168.3 | -5.2 | -1.8 | -3.1 | -7.5 | -5.9 |
Sitagliptin | 160.7 | -13.6 | -19.3 | -15.4 | -12.9 | -2.6 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than (<) 6.5 percent (%) by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12
Intervention | percentage of hemoglobin (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53) | Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53) | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 8.31 | -0.80 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 7.80 | -0.53 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 8.00 | -0.33 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 8.15 | -0.59 |
Placebo | 8.01 | -0.42 |
Sitagliptin | 7.89 | -0.79 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline(Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8
Intervention | percentage of hemoglobin (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53) | Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51) | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | -0.50 | -0.86 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | -0.32 | -0.46 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | -0.24 | -0.32 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | -0.35 | -0.50 |
Placebo | -0.20 | -0.36 |
Sitagliptin | -0.52 | -0.77 |
Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline>200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]; QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >=30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50% | QRS interval: Percent change of >=50% | QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msec | QTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 1 | 1 | 3 | 2 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 0 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Placebo | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
Sitagliptin | 2 | 1 | 7 | 0 |
Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg) | Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg) | Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg) | Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg) | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 3 | 4 | 2 | 3 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 2 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Placebo | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Sitagliptin | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose (up to 101 days)
Intervention | participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
AEs | SAEs | |
Metformin 500 mg | 37 | 0 |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 24 | 1 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 19 | 1 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 19 | 0 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 16 | 0 |
Placebo | 19 | 1 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 18 | 0 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of <6.5 percent and <7 percent. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |
---|---|---|
<6.5 percent | <7 percent | |
PF-04937319 100 mg | 17.6 | 39.2 |
PF-04937319 20 mg | 19.1 | 42.6 |
PF-04937319 3 mg | 9.4 | 26.4 |
PF-04937319 50 mg | 15.4 | 30.8 |
Placebo | 12.5 | 22.9 |
Sitagliptin | 32.1 | 56.6 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 30 to determine the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.32 |
Glimepiride | -0.51 |
Plasma samples were collected from participants after an overnight fast at baseline and Week 30 to determine the mean change from baseline in participant FPG. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -14.5 |
Glimepiride | -21.2 |
Participants were only permitted to wear a drape gown and undergarments (no street clothes, no shoes or socks) for this evaluation. Body weight was measured after voiding (to the nearest 0.1 kg) and measurements were collected until 2 consecutive measurements did not differ by more than 0.2 kg from each other. Body weight measurements were evaluated using a standardized, calibrated digital scale and was reported in kilograms (kg) at baseline and Week 30. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 0.4 |
Glimepiride | 1.1 |
"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 3 |
Glimepiride | 4 |
"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 118 |
Glimepiride | 115 |
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an episode with clinical symptoms attributed to hypoglycemia, without regard to glucose level. Participants were instructed to complete the Hypoglycemia Assessment Log (HAL) for any symptomatic episodes he or she believed represent hypoglycemia. If a fingerstick glucose was obtained before or shortly (i.e., within a few minutes) after treating, the value was recorded in the HAL. In addition, participants were instructed to record in the HAL any fingerstick glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) regardless of the presence of clinical symptoms. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 2 |
Glimepiride | 11 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30. Hemoglobin A1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 9.1 |
Glimepiride | 20.9 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 33.5 |
Glimepiride | 46.6 |
Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks
Intervention | percentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.08 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.76 |
Insulin Glargine | -0.63 |
Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks, and 78 weeks
Intervention | percent (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.65 | -0.59 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.89 | -0.62 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.16 | -0.90 |
Body mass index (BMI) is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | kilograms per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 238) | 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.44 | 0.62 | 0.59 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.50 | -0.39 | -0.39 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -0.64 | -0.64 | -0.64 |
Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | kilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 1.01 | 1.44 | 1.28 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.47 | -1.33 | -1.54 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.82 | -1.87 | -1.96 |
The self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening meal; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3 AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least Squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (Daily Mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=199, 204, 190) | 52 weeks (n=180, 185, 176) | 78 weeks (n=172, 164, 168) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.58 | -1.44 | -1.47 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.46 | -1.32 | -1.15 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.79 | -1.69 | -1.55 |
The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EQ-5D UK, 26 weeks (n=257, 254, 249) | EQ-5D UK, 52 weeks (n=259, 260, 253) | EQ-5D UK, 78 weeks (n=259, 260, 253) | VAS, 26 weeks (n=253, 252, 243) | VAS, 52 weeks (n=260, 258, 252) | VAS, 78 weeks (n=260, 258, 252) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.01 | -0.04 | 0.00 | 0.8 | 1.1 | 2.2 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.4 | 2.3 | 3.2 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 3.8 |
"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living questionnaire (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire [APPADL]) contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=256, 256, 248) | 52 weeks (n=260, 261, 249) | 78 weeks (n=260, 261, 249) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.3 | -0.6 | -0.3 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.1 | 0.4 | 0.3 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.7 | 0.9 | 1.0 |
The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=258, 258, 251) | 52 weeks (n=260, 261, 252) | 78 weeks (n=260, 261, 252) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
The Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) contains 33 items comprised of 2 subscales (behavior and worry), each of which is rated on a 5-point numeric rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). It captures behavioral changes associated with the concerns and experiences of hypoglycemia and the degree to which participants are worried about certain aspects associated with hypoglycemia during the previous 4 weeks. The behavior (or avoidance) subscale has 15 items, and the worry (or affect) subscale has 18 items. Subscale scores are calculated by summing participant responses to items (behavior range 0-60; worry range 0-72). A total score is calculated as the sum of both subscales (range 0-132). Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on subscales and total score. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units on a scale (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=255, 255, 244) | 52 weeks (n=258, 259, 245) | 78 weeks (n=258, 259, 245) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.3 | -1.0 | -2.0 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -2.4 | -4.1 | -4.7 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -2.8 | -4.2 | -4.6 |
The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | milliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QTcF interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229) | QTcF interval, 52 weeks (n=231, 240, 228) | QTcF interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222) | PR interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229) | PR interval, 52 weeks (n=230, 240, 227) | PR interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222) | |
Insulin Glargine | 1.24 | 3.70 | 4.44 | 1.24 | 1.50 | 1.21 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -0.10 | 1.34 | 3.44 | 2.33 | 1.88 | 3.27 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.71 | 1.55 | 1.66 | 2.78 | 2.61 | 2.62 |
Electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | beats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=241, 247, 231) | 52 weeks (n=232, 242, 231) | 78 weeks (n=223, 222, 225) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.24 | -1.01 | -0.26 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.90 | 0.38 | 0.47 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2.64 | 2.41 | 2.49 |
Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | units/liter (Median) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Amylase (total), 26 weeks | Amylase (total), 52 weeks | Amylase (total), 78 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 26 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 52 weeks | Amylase (pancreas-derived), 78 weeks | Lipase, 26 weeks | Lipase, 52 weeks | Lipase, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 2.000 | 3.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 1.000 | 0.000 | -1.000 | -1.000 | -2.000 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 4.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 4.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 | 3.000 | 3.000 | 2.000 | 5.000 | 4.000 | 4.000 |
(NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | picogram/milliliter (Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=266, 267, 258) | 52 weeks (n=266, 269, 259) | 78 weeks (n=267, 269, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.149 | 0.176 | 0.151 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.097 | 0.132 | 0.035 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.163 | 0.128 | 0.086 |
Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | milliliter of mercury (mmHG) (Least Squares Mean) | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | SBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | SBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | DBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245) | DBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | DBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | -0.03 | 0.51 | 0.51 | -0.29 | -0.93 | -1.04 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -1.60 | 0.09 | -0.59 | -0.17 | -0.19 | -0.36 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -1.28 | 0.17 | -0.70 | -0.16 | -0.26 | -0.44 |
Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | picomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
52 weeks (n=232, 231, 228) | 78 weeks (n=235, 235, 232) | |
Insulin Glargine | -3.85 | -3.65 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | -3.31 | -3.37 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | -3.91 | -3.57 |
The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta (β)-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population for both HOMA2-B and HOMA-2S were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline of C-peptide based HOMA2-%B and HOMA2-%S were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | percentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
HOMA2-%B, 52 weeks (n=175, 181) | HOMA2-%B, 78 weeks (n=167, 165) | HOMA2-%S, 52 weeks (n=175,181) | HOMA2-%S, 78 weeks (n=167, 165) | |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 24.60 | 15.66 | -2.66 | -3.62 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 29.95 | 28.54 | -2.89 | -2.64 |
Sitting pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | beats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=257, 260, 245) | 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240) | 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238) | |
Insulin Glargine | -1.21 | -0.52 | -0.91 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.74 | 0.51 | 0.61 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1.56 | 1.29 | 1.31 |
Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 84 | 80 | 79 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 122 | 99 | 91 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 153 | 140 | 129 |
Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258) | 52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | 78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259) | |
Insulin Glargine | 40 | 35 | 43 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 74 | 60 | 59 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 97 | 71 | 74 |
Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0 | 8 | 16 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 4 | 20 | 34 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2 | 11 | 24 |
Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated include myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with adjudicated CV events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Any CV event, 26 weeks | Any fatal CV event, 26 weeks | Any non-fatal CV event, 26 weeks | Any CV event, 52 weeks | Any fatal CV event, 52 weeks | Any non-fatal CV event, 52 weeks | Any CV event, 78 week | Any fatal CV event, 78 week | Any non-fatal CV event, 78 week | |
Insulin Glargine | 3 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 1 | 5 | 9 | 1 | 8 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 6 | 1 | 6 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 2 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0 | 0 | 0 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 1 | 1 | 1 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1 | 2 | 2 |
LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed at baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks, and at the safety follow-up visit 30 days after study drug discontinuation (83 weeks). The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA at each time point were summarized. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, 78, and 83 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | 83 weeks | |
LY2189265 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg | 11 | 3 | 1 | 0 |
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
26 weeks | 52 weeks | 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 137 | 175 | 192 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 146 | 175 | 188 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 160 | 189 | 201 |
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | events (Number) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severe HE, 26 weeks | Severe HE, 52 weeks | Severe HE, 78 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 26 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 52 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 78 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 1 | 2 | 2 | 447 | 789 | 1033 | 609 | 1093 | 1358 | 240 | 519 | 635 | 20 | 22 | 26 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0 | 0 | 0 | 315 | 444 | 515 | 484 | 709 | 911 | 117 | 147 | 184 | 19 | 24 | 28 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 1 | 1 | 2 | 311 | 515 | 607 | 500 | 757 | 884 | 145 | 185 | 215 | 11 | 17 | 20 |
Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks
Intervention | events per participant per year (Mean) | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Severe HE, 26 weeks | Severe HE, 52 weeks | Severe HE, 78 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Documented symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Asymptomatic HE, 78 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 26 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 52 weeks | Nocturnal HE, 78 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 26 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 52 weeks | Probable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks | |
Insulin Glargine | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 3.64 | 3.34 | 3.03 | 4.82 | 4.41 | 3.80 | 1.86 | 2.07 | 1.81 | 0.15 | 0.08 | 0.07 |
LY2189265 0.75 mg | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.52 | 1.97 | 1.66 | 3.58 | 2.68 | 2.38 | 0.96 | 0.65 | 0.59 | 0.14 | 0.09 | 0.07 |
LY2189265 1.5 mg | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 2.35 | 2.03 | 1.67 | 3.79 | 3.08 | 2.56 | 1.23 | 0.90 | 0.77 | 0.08 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | kg (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.367 |
Glimepiride | 0.309 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.66 |
Glimepiride | -0.77 |
β cell function is measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment(HOMA-β). HOMA β = [20 x fasting insulin (μU/mL)] / [fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5] (NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 10.2 |
Glimepiride | 23.7 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W
Intervention | ratio (Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.049 |
Glimepiride | -0.002 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 W
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 7 |
Glimepiride | 23 |
(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: 52 W
Intervention | Participants (Count of Participants) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 89 |
Glimepiride | 86 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.70 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.89 |
Glimepiride | 0.95 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.43 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.68 |
Glimepiride | 1.05 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.45 |
Lira 1.2 | -2.05 |
Glimepiride | 1.12 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -15.82 |
Lira 1.2 | -9.36 |
Glimepiride | 1.97 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -12.06 |
Lira 1.2 | -5.45 |
Glimepiride | 4.57 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -25.57 |
Lira 1.2 | -15.21 |
Glimepiride | -5.29 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.88 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.59 |
Glimepiride | -0.28 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.71 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.44 |
Glimepiride | -0.16 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -1.14 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.84 |
Glimepiride | -0.51 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.15 |
Lira 1.2 | -27.34 |
Glimepiride | -24.85 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -34.83 |
Lira 1.2 | -25.68 |
Glimepiride | -23.84 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.4 |
Lira 1.2 | -30.8 |
Glimepiride | -24.5 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.76 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.28 |
Glimepiride | -7.95 |
Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.01 |
Lira 1.2 | -7.53 |
Glimepiride | -7.97 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -9.6 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.4 |
Glimepiride | -5.6 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 0 | 533 | 405 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 68 | 133 |
Lira 1.8 | 1 | 71 | 87 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 1 | 34 | 4 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Lira 1.8 | 0 | 13 | 3 |
Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.8 |
Glimepiride | 1.2 |
Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -14.6 |
Glimepiride | -17.5 |
Patient-level HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 30 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.47 |
Glimepiride | -0.54 |
(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 21.2 |
Glimepiride | 27.5 |
(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 52.4 |
Glimepiride | 59.6 |
(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 7.0 |
Glimepiride | 22.0 |
This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG. Means are adjusted for baseline FPG, baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance (Interim Analysis). (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.2 |
Linagliptin | -13.3 |
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. The primary analysis was re-run at the completion of the study in the final study report. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.21 |
Linagliptin | -0.39 |
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18
Intervention | percent (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.14 |
Linagliptin | -0.44 |
Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18
Intervention | percent of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 17.8 |
Linagliptin | 36.1 |
Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18
Intervention | percent of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 2.9 |
Linagliptin | 8.9 |
Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18
Intervention | percent of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 11.8 |
Linagliptin | 23.5 |
This change from baseline reflects the FPG (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12,18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=63, 134) | Change from baseline at week 12 (N=55,92) | Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 115) | Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 110) | Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 108) | Change from baseline at week 30 (N=48, 95) | Change from baseline at week 34 (N=48, 95) | Change from baseline at week 40 (N=47, 92) | Change from baseline at week 46 (N=47, 92) | Change from baseline at week 52 (N=43, 86) | |
Linagliptin | -8.4 | -14.3 | -12.9 | -14.0 | -17.0 | -19.1 | -15.8 | -19.0 | -18.1 | -14.0 |
Placebo/Glimepiride | 9.7 | 5.4 | 5.0 | -19.3 | -22.6 | -31.4 | -25.6 | -19.5 | -22.8 | -19.1 |
HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the HbA1c percent (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52
Intervention | percent (Mean) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=64, 136) | Change from baseline at week 12 (N=57, 129) | Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 118) | Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 113) | Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 110) | Change from baseline at week 30 (N=49, 98) | Change from baseline at week 34 (N=50, 96) | Change from baseline at week 40 (N=49, 94) | Change from baseline at week 46 (N=45, 92) | Change from baseline at week 52 (N=45, 92) | |
Linagliptin | -0.21 | -0.43 | -0.38 | -0.40 | -0.48 | -0.49 | -0.49 | -0.45 | -0.42 | -0.44 |
Placebo/Glimepiride | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.10 | -0.32 | -0.53 | -0.79 | -0.75 | -0.73 | -0.78 | -0.72 |
Coefficient of correlation as measured using linear regression analysis for association between two variables, HbA1c values at baseline and hypoglycemia scores. A positive correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value increases, or as as one value decreases the other value decreases. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12
Intervention | Correlation coefficient (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | 0.0026 |
Coefficient of correlation was measured using a linear regression analysis for the association between two variables, HbA1c values at Week 12 and hypoglycemia scores. A negative correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value decreases, and vice versa. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Correlation coefficient (Number) |
---|---|
All Participants | -0.1215 |
Sub-group analyses based on Karl pearson coefficient of correlation for HbA1c values at Week 12 and hypoglycemia score. Participants were grouped based on gender, age, body mass index, and duration of diabetes. A negative correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value decreases, and vice versa. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Correlation coefficient (Number) | |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male, n=526 | Female, n=417 | Age 18-34 years, n=45 | Age 35-44 years, n=171 | Age 45-64 years, n=595 | Age 65 years and older, n=138 | Body mass index <25 kg/m^2, n=370 | Body mass index 25-30 kg/m^2, n=394 | Body mass index >30 kg/m^2, n=183 | Duration of diabetes <5 years, n=640 | Duration of diabetes 5-10 years, n=239 | Duration of diabetes >10 years, n=49 | |
All Participants | -0.1654 | -0.0756 | -0.1636 | -0.1034 | -0.1222 | -0.0984 | -0.0100 | -0.2188 | -0.1688 | -0.1201 | -0.1503 | -0.1316 |
Sub-group analyses of mean hypoglycemia symptom score. Participants were grouped based on gender, age, hypoglycemia severity, body mass index, duration of diabetes, and number of oral hypoglycemic agents. Hypoglycemia symptom score (measured by Stanford Hypoglycemia Questionnaire) is a score on a scale with a possible range of 0 (best) to 7 (worst). The questionnaire was administered by the physician at Week 12. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12
Intervention | Score on a scale (Mean) | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Male, n=526 | Female, n=417 | Age 18-34 years, n=45 | Age 35-44 years, n=171 | Age 45-64 years, n=595 | Age 65 years and older, n=138 | Mild hypoglycemia, n=286 | Moderate hypoglycemia, n=168 | Severe hypoglycemia, n=15 | Body mass index <25 kg/m^2, n=370 | Body mass index 25-30 kg/m^2, n=394 | Body mass index >30 kg/m^2, n=183 | Duration of T2DM <5 years, n=640 | Duration of T2DM 5-10 years, n=239 | Duration of T2DM >10 years, n=49 | No background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=20 | 1 background oral hypoglycemic agent, n=854 | 2 background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=69 | 3 background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=7 | |
All Participants | 0.87 | 1.12 | 0.91 | 0.87 | 0.96 | 1.18 | 1.59 | 2.36 | 2.53 | 1.01 | 0.95 | 0.96 | 0.88 | 1.15 | 1.29 | 0.60 | 0.97 | 1.30 | 0.00 |
Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.45 |
Placebo/ Pioglitazone | 0.28 |
The change from baseline is the Week 24 Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -4.4 |
Placebo/ Pioglitazone | 15.7 |
12 reviews available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyce | 2023 |
Incretin-based drugs for type 2 diabetes: Focus on East Asian perspectives.
Topics: Animals; Asian People; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like | 2016 |
[Hypoglycemic risk of insulinotropic drugs].
Topics: Blood Glucose; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Risk; Sulfonylurea Com | 2009 |
A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Metformin; Pa | 2012 |
Glimepiride: evidence-based facts, trends, and observations (GIFTS). [corrected].
Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medi | 2012 |
Long-acting sulfonylureas -- long-acting hypoglycaemia.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Fatal Outcome; F | 2004 |
Insulin secretagogues: who, what, when, and how?
Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypogly | 2005 |
Sulphonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Fasting; Holidays; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyce | 2005 |
[Knack of treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs in the elderly].
Topics: Aged; Biguanides; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglyce | 2006 |
An overview of the safety and tolerance of glimepiride.
Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic A | 1996 |
Pharmacokinetic basis for the safety of glimepiride in risk groups of NIDDM patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Kidney Di | 1996 |
[Present status in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin-secreting agents].
Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Administration, Oral; Benzamides; Binding Sites; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 1999 |
62 trials available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gl | 2023 |
Incident and recurrent hypoglycaemia with linagliptin and glimepiride over a median of 6 years in the CAROLINA cardiovascular outcome trial.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; G | 2023 |
Efficacy and safety of dual add-on therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on a stable dose of metformin: Results from a 52-week, randomized, active-controlled trial.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double | 2020 |
The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dinoprost; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; | 2017 |
Long-term effects on glycaemic control and β-cell preservation of early intensive treatment in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A multicentre randomized trial.
Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Foll | 2018 |
Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV I | 2018 |
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial.
Topics: Aged; Asia, Eastern; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon | 2018 |
Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial.
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug The | 2018 |
Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr
Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female; | 2019 |
Long-term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: 104-week VERTIS MET trial.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Bone Density; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type | 2019 |
Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years.
Topics: Analysis of Variance; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; | 2013 |
Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metf | 2013 |
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu | 2013 |
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu | 2013 |
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu | 2013 |
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu | 2013 |
Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedu | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit | 2014 |
The effect of glargine versus glimepiride on pancreatic β-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: open-label, randomized, controlled study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Chi-Square Distribution; Diabetes Mellitus, Type | 2014 |
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin compared with α-glucosidase inhibitor in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea alone (SUCCESS-2): a multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-i
Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Aged; alpha-Glucosidases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inh | 2014 |
Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response | 2014 |
Vildagliptin added to sulfonylurea improves glycemic control without hypoglycemia and weight gain in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Case-Control Studies; China; | 2015 |
Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method | 2014 |
Glucose-lowering effects and low risk of hypoglycemia in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young when treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fast | 2014 |
Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Asia; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage | 2015 |
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther | 2015 |
Regardless of the degree of glycaemic control, linagliptin has lower hypoglycaemia risk than all doses of glimepiride, at all time points, over the course of a 2-year trial.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind M | 2015 |
Treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin or placebo followed by glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes with moderate to severe renal impairment: a 52-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double- | 2015 |
Efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared with glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study (GENERATION).
Topics: Adamantane; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptid | 2015 |
Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals.
Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glyburide; Humans; Hypog | 2015 |
Treatment escalation options for patients with type 2 diabetes after failure of exenatide twice daily or glimepiride added to metformin: results from the prospective European Exenatide (EUREXA) study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule | 2015 |
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl | 2015 |
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl | 2015 |
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl | 2015 |
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl | 2015 |
Efficacy and Tolerability of Sitagliptin Compared with Glimepiride in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet; D | 2015 |
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas | 2015 |
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas | 2015 |
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas | 2015 |
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas | 2015 |
Effect of ranolazine on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with either glimepiride or metformin.
Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Dr | 2016 |
A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8).
Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance; | 2016 |
Hypoglycemia in Frail Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Sulfonylurea.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Frail Eld | 2017 |
Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double- | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial).
Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes | 2017 |
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide or glimepiride, both as add-on to metformin.
Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans; | 2010 |
Patient-reported outcomes following treatment with the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide or glimepiride in monotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin | 2010 |
Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr | 2010 |
Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Co | 2011 |
Linagliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients for whom metformin is inappropriate: an 18-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial with a 34-week active-controlled extension.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pep | 2012 |
Usage pattern, glycemic improvement, hypoglycemia, and body mass index changes with sulfonylureas in real-life clinical practice: results from OBSTACLE Hypoglycemia Study.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type | 2013 |
Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyca | 2013 |
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog | 2003 |
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog | 2003 |
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog | 2003 |
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog | 2003 |
Hormonal counterregulation and consecutive glimepiride serum concentrations during severe hypoglycaemia associated with glimepiride therapy.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose; Hormones; Humans | 2003 |
GUIDE study: double-blind comparison of once-daily gliclazide MR and glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyp | 2004 |
Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hy | 2005 |
Good glycemic control with flexibility in timing of basal insulin supply: a 24-week comparison of insulin glargine given once daily in the morning or at bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insu | 2005 |
Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of oral hypoglycemic agent compliance.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule | 2005 |
Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia.
Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Epinephrine; Female; Glucose; Glyburide; Hormones; Human Growth Hor | 2006 |
Differential effect of glimepiride and rosiglitazone on metabolic control of type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.
Topics: Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated | 2006 |
Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type | 2006 |
Therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; I | 2006 |
Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin therapy in Asian Type 2 diabetes patients.
Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated | 2007 |
Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride.
Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relati | 2006 |
Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem | 2007 |
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy | 2007 |
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy | 2007 |
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy | 2007 |
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy | 2007 |
Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adiponectin; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycat | 2008 |
Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the Switch pilot st
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, | 2007 |
Clinical evaluation of glimepiride versus glyburide in NIDDM in a double-blind comparative study. Glimepiride/Glyburide Research Group.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glyburide; G | 1996 |
The effects of acute exercise on metabolic control in type II diabetic patients treated with glimepiride or glibenclamide.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Exercise; Fem | 1996 |
Beginning insulin treatment of obese patients with evening 70/30 insulin plus glimepiride versus insulin alone. Glimepiride Combination Group.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mell | 1998 |
32 other studies available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia
Article | Year |
---|---|
Self-assembled di- and tripeptide gels for the passive entrapment and pH-responsive, sustained release of an antidiabetic drug, glimepiride.
Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gels; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hy | 2022 |
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur | 2023 |
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur | 2023 |
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur | 2023 |
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur | 2023 |
Comparative cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic safety of glimepiride in type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.
Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female | 2020 |
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia.
Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors | 2022 |
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Ventricular Arrhythmia.
Topics: Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cause of Death; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; G | 2018 |
Hypoglycaemia due to interaction of glimepiride with isoniazid in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Aged; Antitubercular Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Hypoglyce | 2013 |
[A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration].
Topics: Aged; Dementia; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Medication Errors; Sulfonylurea Com | 2013 |
How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperc | 2014 |
Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China.
Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analy | 2015 |
Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride.
Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dru | 2016 |
Severe hypoglycemia in users of sulfonylurea antidiabetic agents and antihyperlipidemics.
Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Fenofibrate; Glipizide; Glyburide; Huma | 2016 |
New-Onset Hypoglycemia in a Medically Complex 6-Year-Old Girl. Glimepiride poisoning.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Sulfonylurea Compo | 2015 |
Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Emergency Service, | 2015 |
A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure Determination; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double- | 2016 |
Biomedical Informatics Approaches to Identifying Drug-Drug Interactions: Application to Insulin Secretagogues.
Topics: Area Under Curve; Carbamates; Cyclohexanes; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Inte | 2017 |
SUR receptor activity vs. incidence of hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular mortality with sulphonylurea therapy for diabetics.
Topics: ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Diabetes Mellitus; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Potassium Cha | 2008 |
Basal insulin glargine vs prandial insulin lispro in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Synergism; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; | 2008 |
Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and glimepiride in subjects with Type 2 diabetes before, during and after the period of fasting in Ramadan.
Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypog | 2009 |
Factitious hypoglycaemia.
Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Factitious Disorders; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; M | 2009 |
Severe sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia: a problem of uncritical prescription and deficiencies of diabetes care in geriatric patients.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus, | 2010 |
[Detection of glimepiride and rosiglitazone from Chinese dietary supplements].
Topics: Aged; China; Chromatography, Liquid; Dietary Supplements; Drug Overdose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypog | 2011 |
Hypoglycemia after accidental pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions.
Topics: Accidents, Home; Arizona; Blood Glucose; Child, Preschool; Emergency Service, Hospital; Glipizide; G | 2011 |
Association of KCNJ11 E23K gene polymorphism with hypoglycemia in sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Alleles; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Diabetes Mellitus, Typ | 2012 |
Characteristics and time course of severe glimepiride- versus glibenclamide-induced hypoglycaemia.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyburide; Humans; | 2003 |
Inadvertent sulfonylurea overdosage and hypoglycemia in an elderly woman: failure of serum hypoglycemia screening.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Overdose; Female; | 2003 |
A diabetic woman with worsening heart failure, hunger, and tremor.
Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Gastrointestinal Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Hy | 2003 |
The diagnostic value of determining the hydroxy metabolite of glimepiride (M1) in blood serum in cases of severe hypoglycaemia associated with glimepiride therapy.
Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agent | 2004 |
Association between CYP2C9 slow metabolizer genotypes and severe hypoglycaemia on medication with sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents.
Topics: Aged; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Case-Control Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Diabetes Mellitu | 2005 |
[Hardly any hypoglycemias, constant weight--and still cost effective].
Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drugs, Generic; Glyburide; Humans; Hy | 2005 |
Gatifloxacin induced abnormalities in glucose homeostasis in a patient on glimepiride.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gatifloxacin; Hom | 2006 |
Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France.
Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Glipi | 2008 |
[Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in newborn associated with glimepiride treatment at the beginning of pregnancy].
Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; In | 2000 |