Page last updated: 2024-10-27

glimepiride and Hypoglycemia

glimepiride has been researched along with Hypoglycemia in 106 studies

glimepiride: structure given in first source

Hypoglycemia: A syndrome of abnormally low BLOOD GLUCOSE level. Clinical hypoglycemia has diverse etiologies. Severe hypoglycemia eventually lead to glucose deprivation of the CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM resulting in HUNGER; SWEATING; PARESTHESIA; impaired mental function; SEIZURES; COMA; and even DEATH.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."9.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"Adding mitiglinide/voglibose to vildagliptin therapy results in more efficient postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycemia than adding glimepiride."9.27Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial. ( Fujimoto, K; Hamamoto, Y; Hamasaki, A; Honjo, S; Shibayama, Y; Yamaguchi, E, 2018)
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5."9.22Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016)
"Reported rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lower with glimepiride as compared to glyburide."9.20Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals. ( Davis, SN; Joy, NG; Tate, DB, 2015)
"Vildagliptin, in addition to metformin, was more effective than glimepiride + metformin in reducing insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."9.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes."9.17Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."9.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
"Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride."9.12Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia. ( Cryer, PE; Fender, AB; Gerich, JE; Gosmanov, NR; Meyer, C; Nihalani, A; Sinkin, JC; Szoke, E, 2006)
"Linagliptin treatment for 104 weeks was recently reported to achieve non-inferior glucose-lowering effects compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin."6.78Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years. ( Emser, A; Gallwitz, B; Rosenstock, J; von Eynatten, M; Woerle, HJ, 2013)
"Glimepiride was detected at a concentration of 24."5.39[A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration]. ( Araki, E; Fujieda, N; Hazekawa, I, 2013)
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."5.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"Adding mitiglinide/voglibose to vildagliptin therapy results in more efficient postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycemia than adding glimepiride."5.27Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial. ( Fujimoto, K; Hamamoto, Y; Hamasaki, A; Honjo, S; Shibayama, Y; Yamaguchi, E, 2018)
"Vildagliptin effectively improved glucose level with a significantly greater reduction in glycemic variability and hypoglycemia than glimepiride in patients with T2DM ongoing metformin therapy."5.24The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Hur, KY; Jin, SM; Kim, G; Kim, JH; Lee, MK; Oh, S, 2017)
"The percentage of patients experiencing any hypoglycemia event (ie, symptomatic event or event of plasma glucose concentration <54 mg/dL regardless of symptoms) was lower with saxagliptin compared with glimepiride (5."5.22Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin. ( Cook, W; Hirshberg, B; Ohman, P; Perl, S; Wei, C, 2016)
"5 mg, compared with daily insulin glargine without forced titration, demonstrated greater HbA1c reduction and weight loss, with a higher incidence of gastrointestinal adverse events and a lower risk of hypoglycemia."5.20Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2). ( Benroubi, M; Giorgino, F; Pechtner, V; Sun, JH; Zimmermann, AG, 2015)
"Reported rates of hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus are lower with glimepiride as compared to glyburide."5.20Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals. ( Davis, SN; Joy, NG; Tate, DB, 2015)
"Vildagliptin, in addition to metformin, was more effective than glimepiride + metformin in reducing insulin resistance and post-prandial lipemia."5.19Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bianchi, L; Bonaventura, A; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Maffioli, P; Romano, D, 2014)
"0 mmol/mol) without hypoglycaemia and weight gain was higher with vildagliptin than glimepiride after 2 years in type 2 diabetes patients inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy, regardless of age and duration of diabetes."5.17Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment. ( Bader, G; Geransar, P; Schweizer, A, 2013)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."5.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
" glimepiride can improve psychological and emotional well-being and health perceptions by reducing anxiety and worry associated with weight gain."5.14Patient-reported outcomes following treatment with the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide or glimepiride in monotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Blonde, L; Bode, BW; Garber, A; Hale, PM; Hammer, M; Magwire, M; Testa, MA, 2010)
"These results confirm earlier reports that insulin glargine provides superior glycemic control with less hypoglycemia and demonstrates that these benefits are consistent between different ethnicities."5.12Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin therapy in Asian Type 2 diabetes patients. ( Chung, KD; Kim, KW; Pan, CY; Sinnassamy, P, 2007)
"In patients with T2DM, inadequately controlled on OADs, once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride is effective in improving metabolic control with a reduced incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia compared with NPH insulin."5.12Therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride. ( Aschner, P; Calvo, C; Eliaschewitz, FG; Jimenez, J; Ramirez, LA; Ruiz, M; Valbuena, H; Villena, J, 2006)
"Once-daily glargine can be administered in a flexible morning or bedtime regimen (plus morning glimepiride) to achieve good glycemic control without any difference in hypoglycemia."5.12Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility. ( Maxeiner, S; Raptis, S; Standl, E, 2006)
"Severe hypoglycemia, the most serious side effect of sulfonylurea therapy, has been reported to occur more frequently with glyburide than glimepiride."5.12Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia. ( Cryer, PE; Fender, AB; Gerich, JE; Gosmanov, NR; Meyer, C; Nihalani, A; Sinkin, JC; Szoke, E, 2006)
"The risk for nocturnal hypoglycemia was lower with glimepiride in combination with morning and bedtime insulin glargine than with glimepiride in combination with bedtime NPH insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes."5.10Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial. ( Fritsche, A; Häring, HU; Schweitzer, MA, 2003)
" Glimepiride is used to treat type II diabetes but is associated with side effects, like lower half-life, faster elimination, and hypoglycemia."4.12Self-assembled di- and tripeptide gels for the passive entrapment and pH-responsive, sustained release of an antidiabetic drug, glimepiride. ( Bhatia, Y; Halder, M; Singh, Y, 2022)
"In quarters with glipizide/glimepiride use, hospital admissions or emergency department visits for hypoglycemia were more common in person quarters with concurrent warfarin use compared with quarters without warfarin use (294/416,479 v 1903/3,938,939; adjusted odds ratio 1."3.81Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis. ( Goldman, DP; Gong, C; Jena, AB; Peters, A; Romley, JA; Williams, B, 2015)
"Gatifloxacin, a commonly prescribed antimicrobial can produce profound hypoglycemia and disturbances in glucose homeostasis especially in diabetes patients on sulphonylureas."3.73Gatifloxacin induced abnormalities in glucose homeostasis in a patient on glimepiride. ( Kesavadev, J; Rasheed, SA, 2006)
"Seventy drug-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (mean age, 52."3.30Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study. ( Ahn, J; Florez, JC; Lim, S; Nauck, MA; Sohn, M, 2023)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes and HbA1c 53-86 mmol/mol (7% to 10%) were randomized to empagliflozin 25 mg or glimepiride 1 to 4 mg for 104 weeks as add-on to metformin."2.87Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial. ( Andersen, KR; Ridderstråle, M; Rosenstock, J; Salsali, A; Woerle, HJ, 2018)
" The most common drug-related adverse events in both dulaglutide groups (≥5% of patients) included diarrhoea, nausea, increased lipase, decreased appetite, abdominal distension and vomiting."2.87Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial. ( Chen, YH; Cho, YM; Gu, L; Huang, CN; Li, P; Wang, F; Wang, WQ; Yang, J, 2018)
" Safety endpoints were adverse events including hypoglycaemia."2.84Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial). ( Ishida, H; Kitaoka, M; Ohsugi, M; Satoh, J; Seino, Y; Shihara, N; Terauchi, Y; Yabe, D; Yamada, Y, 2017)
" The most common treatment-emergent adverse events for dulaglutide 1."2.82A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8). ( Dungan, KM; Fahrbach, JL; Jiang, HH; Perez Manghi, F; Pintilei, E; Robertson, KE; Shell, J; Weitgasser, R, 2016)
" The insulin dosing algorithm was not sufficient to equalize nocturnal hypoglycaemia between the two insulins."2.80Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes. ( Bolli, GB; Candelas, C; Dain, MP; Deerochanawong, C; Home, PD; Landgraf, W; Mathieu, C; Pilorget, V; Riddle, MC, 2015)
"Many patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) initiate insulin therapy when other treatments fail; how best to do this is poorly defined."2.79Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections. ( Gao, L; Riddle, MC; Rosenstock, J; Vlajnic, A, 2014)
" The incidence rates of adverse events and adverse drug reactions, including hypoglycaemia, during the double-blind randomized period were similar in both groups."2.79Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension. ( Kadowaki, T; Kondo, K, 2014)
"Glimepiride was up-titrated once weekly in a treat-to-target manner; liraglutide was up-titrated once weekly to 1."2.79Glucose-lowering effects and low risk of hypoglycemia in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young when treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial. ( Bagger, JI; Faber, J; Hansen, T; Holst, JJ; Knop, FK; Pedersen, O; Vilsbøll, T; Østoft, SH, 2014)
"People with inadequately controlled type 2 diabetes (n = 99) were randomly assigned on a 1∶1∶1 basis to receive insulin glargin, with fixed doses of glimepiride, metformin, and glimepiride plus metformin."2.79Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Chon, S; Kang, JG; Lee, CB; Noh, J; Oh, SJ; Park, CY; Park, SW, 2014)
"Vildagliptin treatment was associated with less fluctuation of glucose levels than glimepiride treatment as assessed by 24-h CGM device, suggesting vildagliptin may have the potential to offer long-term beneficial effects for patients with T2DM in preventing the development of complications of diabetes."2.78Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring. ( Forst, T; Foteinos, G; He, YL; Kulmatycki, K; Mattapalli, D; Neelakantham, S; Taylor, A, 2013)
"Patients of either gender with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), between 18 and 75 years old and requiring addition of a sulfonylurea to an ongoing regimen of oral antihyperglycemic agent(s), were enrolled."2.78Usage pattern, glycemic improvement, hypoglycemia, and body mass index changes with sulfonylureas in real-life clinical practice: results from OBSTACLE Hypoglycemia Study. ( Agrawal, N; Deepak, MC; Kalra, S; Narang, P; Singh, V; Uvaraj, MG, 2013)
"Glimepiride treatment as initial mono-therapy could effectively improve blood glucose control in type 2 diabetic patients, with a favorable safety profile."2.78Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Duan, WR; Gao, Y; Guo, XH; Han, P; Lv, XF; Yang, HZ; Zhang, XZ, 2013)
"Linagliptin treatment for 104 weeks was recently reported to achieve non-inferior glucose-lowering effects compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin."2.78Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years. ( Emser, A; Gallwitz, B; Rosenstock, J; von Eynatten, M; Woerle, HJ, 2013)
"in patients with type 2 diabetes and inadequate glycaemic control on metformin monotherapy, the addition of sitagliptin or glimepiride led to similar improvement in glycaemic control after 30 weeks."2.76Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. ( Arechavaleta, R; Chen, Y; Duran, L; Goldstein, BJ; Kaufman, KD; Krobot, KJ; O'Neill, EA; Seck, T; Williams-Herman, D, 2011)
" Insulin dosage in each group was titrated to target fasting blood glucose (FBG) of 100 mg/dL or less (2.73Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Busch, K; Janka, HU; Plewe, G, 2007)
" 47%) and drug-related adverse experiences (AEs) (15 vs."2.73Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin. ( Fanurik, D; Hermansen, K; Khatami, H; Kipnes, M; Luo, E; Stein, P, 2007)
"This study assessed the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of fixed-dose combination (FDC) rosiglitazone (RSG) plus glimepiride (GLIM) compared with RSG or GLIM monotherapy in drug-naive subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM)."2.73Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes. ( Chou, HS; Ferreira-Cornwell, C; Goldstein, BJ; Jones, AR; Krebs, J; Palmer, JP; Waterhouse, B, 2008)
"Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim."2.72Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. ( Kann, PH; Medding, J; Moeller, J; Mokan, M; Mrevlje, F; Regulski, M; Szocs, A; Wascher, T; Zackova, V, 2006)
" Insulin dosage was titrated to target FBG 2.71Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. ( Janka, HU; Kliebe-Frisch, C; Plewe, G; Riddle, MC; Schweitzer, MA; Yki-Järvinen, H, 2005)
" A dosage of 70/30 insulin before supper was titrated, seeking fasting capillary blood glucose (FBG) 120 mg/dl (6."2.69Beginning insulin treatment of obese patients with evening 70/30 insulin plus glimepiride versus insulin alone. Glimepiride Combination Group. ( Riddle, MC; Schneider, J, 1998)
"The average glucose level at which hemiparesis developed was 1."2.48A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review. ( Itoh, A; Itoh, H; Kawai, T; Meguro, S; Soeda, Y; Yoshino, T, 2012)
"Glimepiride is a second-generation sulfonylurea that stimulates pancreatic β cells to release insulin."2.48Glimepiride: evidence-based facts, trends, and observations (GIFTS). [corrected]. ( Basit, A; Fawwad, A; Riaz, M, 2012)
"In the treatment of elderly type 2 diabetes, it is important to detect hypoglycemia correctly, because the elderly patients often exhibit atypical symptoms from hypoglycemia."2.43[Knack of treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs in the elderly]. ( Hashizume, K; Komatsu, M, 2006)
" All of the patients provided an extensive medial history which included information on concomitant medications, underlying diseases, and ongoing adverse events."2.39An overview of the safety and tolerance of glimepiride. ( Schneider, J, 1996)
" Pharmacokinetic data on sulfonylureas are generally inconsistent in cirrhotic patients."2.39Pharmacokinetic basis for the safety of glimepiride in risk groups of NIDDM patients. ( Rosenkranz, B, 1996)
" We compared the effects of three SU medications and initial SU doses on adverse glycemic and cardiovascular events among NH residents."1.91Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents. ( Berry, SD; Hayes, KN; Munshi, MN; Riester, MR; Zullo, AR, 2023)
"Serious hypoglycemia is a major adverse event associated with insulin secretagogues."1.72Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Flory, JH; Hee Nam, Y; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE, 2022)
"Glimepiride was also associated with a lower incidence of all-cause mortality (HR 0."1.56Comparative cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic safety of glimepiride in type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study. ( Dell'Aniello, S; Douros, A; Suissa, S; Yu, OHY, 2020)
" We aimed to systematically screen for drugs that interact with the five most commonly used secretagogues-glipizide, glyburide, glimepiride, repaglinide, and nateglinide-to cause serious hypoglycemia."1.46Biomedical Informatics Approaches to Identifying Drug-Drug Interactions: Application to Insulin Secretagogues. ( Bilker, WB; Brensinger, CM; Chiang, C; Han, X; Hennessy, S; Leonard, CE; Li, L, 2017)
"The Cardiff Model was used to simulate disease progression and estimate the long-term effect of treatments on patients."1.42Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China. ( Deng, J; Dong, H; Gu, S; Mu, Y; Shi, L, 2015)
"A 58 year-old woman with type 2 diabetes diagnosed 3 years before came to our clinic."1.40How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias. ( Mezquita Raya, P; Reyes García, R, 2014)
"Glimepiride was detected at a concentration of 24."1.39[A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration]. ( Araki, E; Fujieda, N; Hazekawa, I, 2013)
"Hypoglycemia was more likely to occur with glipizide ingestion than glyburide (odds ratio, 3."1.37Hypoglycemia after accidental pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions. ( Burns, BD; Levine, M; Lovecchio, F; Pizon, AF; Riley, BD; Ruha, AM; Thomas, SH, 2011)
"Severe hypoglycemia was defined as a symptomatic event requiring treatment with intravenous glucose and was confirmed by a blood glucose measurement of < 50 mg/dl."1.36Severe sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia: a problem of uncritical prescription and deficiencies of diabetes care in geriatric patients. ( Hahn, M; Hammer, C; Holstein, A; Kovacs, P; Kulamadayil, NS, 2010)
"A total of 400 patients with type 2 diabetes, who were > or = 35 years old and who had been treated with metformin and a sulphonylurea for at least 6 months, completed questionnaires during their usual primary care office visit."1.35Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France. ( Krishnarajah, G; Lyu, R; Mavros, P; Vexiau, P; Yin, D, 2008)

Research

Studies (106)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's6 (5.66)18.2507
2000's34 (32.08)29.6817
2010's58 (54.72)24.3611
2020's8 (7.55)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Halder, M1
Bhatia, Y1
Singh, Y1
Zullo, AR2
Riester, MR2
Hayes, KN2
Munshi, MN2
Berry, SD2
Lim, S1
Sohn, M1
Florez, JC1
Nauck, MA1
Ahn, J1
Shrivastava, A1
Kesavadev, J2
Mohan, V1
Saboo, B1
Shrestha, D1
Maheshwari, A1
Makkar, BM1
Modi, KD1
Kumar Das, A1
Rosenstock, J6
Kolkailah, AA1
McGuire, DK1
Espeland, MA1
Mattheus, M1
Pfarr, E2
Lund, SS1
Marx, N1
Douros, A1
Dell'Aniello, S1
Yu, OHY1
Suissa, S1
Frias, JP1
Gonzalez-Galvez, G1
Johnsson, E1
Maaske, J1
Testa, MA2
Simonson, DC1
Dronamraju, N1
Garcia-Sanchez, R1
Peters, AL1
Hee Nam, Y1
Brensinger, CM4
Bilker, WB4
Flory, JH3
Leonard, CE4
Hennessy, S4
Kim, G1
Oh, S1
Jin, SM1
Hur, KY1
Kim, JH1
Lee, MK1
Chon, S2
Rhee, SY1
Ahn, KJ1
Baik, SH1
Park, Y1
Nam, MS1
Lee, KW1
Yoo, SJ1
Koh, G1
Lee, DH1
Kim, YS1
Woo, JT1
Aquilante, CL1
Boudreau, DM1
Deo, R1
Gagne, JJ2
Mangaali, MJ1
Fujimoto, K1
Shibayama, Y1
Yamaguchi, E1
Honjo, S1
Hamasaki, A1
Hamamoto, Y1
Chen, YH1
Huang, CN1
Cho, YM1
Li, P1
Gu, L1
Wang, F1
Yang, J1
Wang, WQ1
Ridderstråle, M1
Andersen, KR1
Woerle, HJ5
Salsali, A1
Gu, T1
Ma, J2
Zhang, Q1
Zhu, L1
Zhang, H1
Xu, L1
Cheng, J1
Shi, B1
Li, D1
Shao, J1
Sun, Z1
Zhong, S1
Bi, Y1
Zhu, D1
Gallo, S1
Charbonnel, B1
Goldman, A1
Shi, H1
Huyck, S1
Darekar, A1
Lauring, B1
Terra, SG1
Gallwitz, B4
Emser, A1
von Eynatten, M4
Bader, G1
Geransar, P1
Schweizer, A1
Boglou, P1
Steiropoulos, P1
Papanas, N1
Bouros, D1
He, YL1
Foteinos, G1
Neelakantham, S1
Mattapalli, D1
Kulmatycki, K1
Forst, T1
Taylor, A1
Fujieda, N1
Hazekawa, I1
Araki, E1
Riddle, MC4
Vlajnic, A1
Gao, L1
Kadowaki, T1
Kondo, K1
Moon, JS1
Ha, KS1
Yoon, JS1
Lee, HW1
Lee, HC1
Won, KC1
Kobayashi, K1
Yokoh, H1
Sato, Y1
Takemoto, M1
Uchida, D1
Kanatsuka, A1
Kuribayashi, N1
Terano, T1
Hashimoto, N1
Sakurai, K1
Hanaoka, H1
Ishikawa, K1
Onishi, S1
Yokote, K1
Reyes García, R1
Mezquita Raya, P1
Park, CY1
Kang, JG1
Noh, J1
Oh, SJ1
Lee, CB1
Park, SW1
Yang, W1
Xing, X1
Lv, X1
Li, Y1
Yuan, G1
Sun, F1
Wang, W1
Woloschak, M1
Lukashevich, V1
Kozlovski, P1
Kothny, W1
Derosa, G2
Bonaventura, A1
Bianchi, L1
Romano, D1
Fogari, E2
D'Angelo, A1
Maffioli, P1
Østoft, SH1
Bagger, JI1
Hansen, T1
Pedersen, O1
Faber, J1
Holst, JJ1
Knop, FK1
Vilsbøll, T1
Home, PD1
Bolli, GB1
Mathieu, C1
Deerochanawong, C1
Landgraf, W1
Candelas, C1
Pilorget, V1
Dain, MP1
Leiter, LA1
Yoon, KH1
Arias, P1
Langslet, G2
Xie, J1
Balis, DA1
Millington, D1
Vercruysse, F1
Canovatchel, W1
Meininger, G2
Patel, S3
Hehnke, U2
Mehlburger, L1
Dugi, KA1
Laakso, M1
Groop, PH1
Barnett, AH2
Tamminen, I1
Schernthaner, G3
Durán-Garcia, S1
Hanefeld, M1
Niskanen, L1
Östgren, CJ1
Malvolti, E1
Hardy, E1
Joy, NG1
Tate, DB1
Davis, SN1
Rosas-Guzmán, J1
Dotta, F1
Guerci, B1
Simó, R1
Festa, A1
Kiljański, J1
Zhou, M1
Amin, NB1
Aggarwal, N1
Pall, D1
Paragh, G1
Denney, WS1
Le, V1
Riggs, M1
Calle, RA1
Gu, S1
Deng, J1
Shi, L1
Mu, Y1
Dong, H1
Hartley, P1
Shentu, Y1
Betz-Schiff, P1
Golm, GT1
Sisk, CM1
Engel, SS1
Shankar, RR1
Giorgino, F1
Benroubi, M1
Sun, JH1
Zimmermann, AG1
Pechtner, V1
Chirila, C1
Zheng, Q1
Davenport, E1
Kaschinski, D1
Hach, T1
Palencia, R1
Han, X2
Flockhart, DA1
Cardillo, S1
Wolpaw, AJ1
Trella, JD1
Egan, MA1
Delgado, EM1
Romley, JA1
Gong, C1
Jena, AB1
Goldman, DP1
Williams, B1
Peters, A1
Pettus, J1
McNabb, B1
Eckel, RH1
Skyler, JS1
Dhalla, A1
Guan, S1
Jochelson, P1
Belardinelli, L1
Henry, RH1
Dungan, KM1
Weitgasser, R1
Perez Manghi, F1
Pintilei, E1
Fahrbach, JL1
Jiang, HH1
Shell, J1
Robertson, KE1
Seino, Y2
Kuwata, H1
Yabe, D2
Patel, CA1
Bailey, RA1
Vijapurkar, U1
Blonde, L2
van Dijk, P1
Bouma, A1
Landman, GW1
Groenier, KH1
Bilo, H1
Kleefstra, N1
van Hateren, KJ1
Perl, S1
Cook, W1
Wei, C1
Ohman, P1
Hirshberg, B1
Chiang, C1
Li, L1
Terauchi, Y1
Yamada, Y1
Ishida, H1
Ohsugi, M1
Kitaoka, M1
Satoh, J2
Shihara, N1
Tayek, J1
Arnolds, S1
Rave, K1
Salti, I1
Böhm, R1
Cascorbi, I1
Herdegen, T1
Yates, C1
Neoh, S1
Konpa, A1
Fullinfaw, R1
Colman, P1
Hermansen, K2
Kolotkin, RL1
Hammer, M2
Zdravkovic, M1
Matthews, D1
Holstein, A5
Hammer, C3
Hahn, M1
Kulamadayil, NS1
Kovacs, P1
Bode, BW1
Magwire, M1
Hale, PM1
Garber, A1
Matthews, DR1
Dejager, S1
Ahren, B1
Fonseca, V1
Ferrannini, E1
Couturier, A1
Foley, JE1
Zinman, B1
Arechavaleta, R1
Seck, T1
Chen, Y1
Krobot, KJ1
O'Neill, EA1
Duran, L1
Kaufman, KD1
Williams-Herman, D1
Goldstein, BJ2
Fujita, Y1
Honma, H1
Fujino, Y1
Onodera, M1
Inoue, Y1
Endo, S1
Levine, M1
Ruha, AM1
Lovecchio, F1
Riley, BD1
Pizon, AF1
Burns, BD1
Thomas, SH1
Yoshino, T1
Meguro, S1
Soeda, Y1
Itoh, A1
Kawai, T1
Itoh, H1
Ragia, G1
Tavridou, A1
Petridis, I1
Manolopoulos, VG1
Harper, R1
Toorawa, R1
Thiemann, S1
Basit, A2
Riaz, M1
Fawwad, A1
Kalra, S1
Deepak, MC1
Narang, P1
Singh, V1
Uvaraj, MG1
Agrawal, N1
Guo, XH1
Lv, XF1
Han, P1
Zhang, XZ1
Yang, HZ1
Duan, WR1
Gao, Y1
Plaschke, A4
Egberts, EH4
Fritsche, A1
Schweitzer, MA3
Häring, HU1
Earle, KE1
Rushakoff, RJ1
Goldfine, ID1
Skugor, M1
Siraj, ES1
Ptak, M3
Kuhn, J1
Kratzsch, C1
Diekmann, J1
Kleesiek, K1
Maurer, HH2
Veitch, PC1
Clifton-Bligh, RJ1
Tenberken, O1
Grimaldi, A1
Di Mario, U1
Drzewoski, J1
Kempler, P1
Kvapil, M1
Novials, A1
Rottiers, R1
Rutten, GE1
Shaw, KM1
Janka, HU2
Plewe, G2
Kliebe-Frisch, C1
Yki-Järvinen, H1
Standl, E2
Maxeiner, S2
Raptis, S2
Karimi-Anderesi, Z1
Charpentier, G1
Fleury, F1
Dubroca, I1
Vaur, L1
Clerson, P1
El-Din, J1
Brockmöller, J1
Kirchheiner, J1
Dailey, G1
Szoke, E1
Gosmanov, NR1
Sinkin, JC1
Nihalani, A1
Fender, AB1
Cryer, PE1
Meyer, C1
Gerich, JE1
Zargar, A1
Mahtab, H1
Komatsu, M1
Hashizume, K1
Gaddi, AV1
Piccinni, MN1
Salvadeo, S1
Ciccarelli, L1
Ghelfi, M1
Ferrari, I1
Cicero, AF1
Eliaschewitz, FG1
Calvo, C1
Valbuena, H1
Ruiz, M1
Aschner, P1
Villena, J1
Ramirez, LA1
Jimenez, J1
Pan, CY1
Sinnassamy, P1
Chung, KD1
Kim, KW1
Kann, PH1
Wascher, T1
Zackova, V1
Moeller, J1
Medding, J1
Szocs, A1
Mokan, M1
Mrevlje, F1
Regulski, M1
Busch, K1
Rasheed, SA1
Kipnes, M1
Luo, E1
Fanurik, D1
Khatami, H1
Stein, P1
Chou, HS1
Palmer, JP1
Jones, AR1
Waterhouse, B1
Ferreira-Cornwell, C1
Krebs, J1
Schiel, R1
Müller, UA1
Vexiau, P1
Mavros, P1
Krishnarajah, G1
Lyu, R1
Yin, D1
Schneider, J3
Dills, DG1
Rosenkranz, B1
Massi-Benedetti, M1
Herz, M1
Pfeiffer, C1
Blicklé, JF1
Andres, E1
Neyrolles, N1
Brogard, JM1
Balaguer Santamaría, JA1
Feliu Rovira, A1
Escribano Subias, J1
Salvadó Juncosa, O1
Sardá Auré, P1
Gussinyé Canadell, M1

Clinical Trials (37)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A 52-week International, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Parallel Group, Phase 3bTrial With a Blinded 104-week Long -Term Extension Period to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin Co-administered With Dapagliflozin in C[NCT02419612]Phase 3444 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-08-14Completed
The Effect of Vildagliptin Based Treatment Versus Sulfonylurea on Glycemic Variability, Oxidative Stress, GLP-1, and Endothelial Function in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01404676]Phase 434 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin and Glimepiride in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Controlled Inadequately With Metformin Monotherapy (SPECIFY Study) : a 48-week, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Trial[NCT02280486]Phase 4388 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 26-Week Multicenter Study With a 78-Week Extension To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Ertugliflozin In Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus And Inadequate Glycemic Control On Metformin Monothe[NCT02033889]Phase 3621 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-12-13Completed
A Randomised Double-blind, Active-controlled Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 ( 5.0 mg, Administered Orally Once Daily) Compared to Glimepiride Over Two Years in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Insufficient Glycaemic Control Despite Metfo[NCT00622284]Phase 31,560 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-02-29Completed
Pilot Study to Assess the Difference in Glycemic Profiles Between Vildagliptin and Glimepiride Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Device[NCT01262586]Phase 324 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-11-30Completed
A Randomised Controlled Trial for People With Established Type 2 Diabetes During Ramadan: Canagliflozin (Invokana™) vs. Standard Dual Therapy Regimen: The 'Can Do Ramadan' Study[NCT02694263]Phase 425 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-07-31Completed
A Phase III Study of MP-513 in Combination With Thiazolidinedione in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01026194]Phase 3204 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-12-31Completed
A Phase III Study of MP-513 in Combination With Sulfonylurea in Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00974090]Phase 3194 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Phase IIb, Double-blind, Parallel Group, Multi-center, Dose-finding Study to Investigate the Efficacy and Safety of 4 Doses of MP-513 When Added to Ongoing Metformin Monotherapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, With an Open Label Extension[NCT00971243]Phase 2448 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-08-31Completed
Lantus vs Sulfonylurea as add-on Therapy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients Failing Metformin Monotherapy: Comparison of Effects on Beta Cell Function and Metabolic Profile.[NCT00562172]Phase 475 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-09-30Completed
Insulin Glargine Combined With Sulfonylurea Versus Metformin in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, Controlled Trial.[NCT00708578]Phase 499 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-group Study to Compare the Effect of 24 Weeks Treatment With Vildagliptin 50mg qd to Placebo as add-on Therapy to Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled With Sulfonylurea Mono[NCT01357252]Phase 3279 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-04-30Completed
Phase 2 Study: A Double-blind, Randomised, Clinical Cross-over Trial to Investigate the Treatment Potential of Liraglutide Compared to Glimepiride in MODY Patients[NCT01610934]Phase 2/Phase 315 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-08-31Completed
Superiority of Insulin Glargine Lantus vs. NPH: Treat to Normoglycemia Concept.Effect of Insulin Glargine in Comparison to Insulin NPH in Insulin-nave People With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With at Least One OAD and Not Adequately Controlled[NCT00949442]Phase 4708 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812]Phase 31,452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A 52-Week, Randomised, Double Blind, Active-Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase IIIb/IV Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Tolerability of Saxagliptin Compared to Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycaemic Contr[NCT01006603]Phase 4957 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-10-31Completed
Long Term Treatment With Exenatide Versus Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Pretreated With Metformin (EUREXA: European Exenatide Study)[NCT00359762]Phase 31,029 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-09-30Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Glimepiride In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Metformin[NCT01517373]Phase 2304 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-02-29Completed
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blinded, Placebo-controlled, Dose-ranging, Parallel Group Study To Evaluate Safety And Efficacy Of Pf-04937319 And Sitagliptin On Glycemic Control In Adult Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled On Met[NCT01475461]Phase 2345 participants (Actual)Interventional2011-11-30Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Sitagliptin Compared With Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control[NCT01189890]Phase 3480 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-16Completed
Effect of Dulaglutide on Liver Fat in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT03590626]60 participants (Actual)Interventional2019-01-01Completed
A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Arm, Noninferiority Comparison of the Effects of Two Doses of LY2189265 and Insulin Glargine on Glycemic Control in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Stable Doses of Metformin and Glimepiride[NCT01075282]Phase 3810 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety Comparison of Sitagliptin and Glimepiride in Elderly Japanese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT01183104]305 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-31Completed
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power)
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of Sitagliptin Compared With the Addition of Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformin[NCT00701090]Phase 31,035 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-05-31Completed
A Randomised, db, Placebo-controlled, Parallel Group Efficacy and Safety Study of BI 1356 (5mg), Administered Orally Once Daily for 18 Weeks Followed by a 34 Week Double-blind Extension Period (Placebo Patients Switched to Glimepiride) in Type 2 Diabetic [NCT00740051]Phase 3227 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-08-31Completed
Prospective Observational Study to Assess Correlation Between Glycemic Control and Hypoglycemia in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated With Sulfonylurea[NCT00907881]1,069 participants (Actual)Observational2009-08-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride as Oral Anti-Diabetic (OAD) Initiation Mono- Therapy in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)[NCT00908921]Phase 4391 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients With Insulin Resistance: A 6 Month Comparison of Insulin Glargine and NPH Insulin[NCT01854723]Phase 40 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-04-30Withdrawn
Bedtime Insulin Glargine or Bedtime Neutral Protamine Lispro Combined With Sulfonylurea and Metformin in Type 2 Diabetes. A Randomized, Controlled Trial[NCT00641407]Phase 4100 participants (Actual)Interventional2007-01-31Completed
Phase 4 Study of Comparison of Combination Therapy of Gliclazide MR and Basal Insulin With Pre-mix Insulin Monotherapy for the Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00736515]Phase 4160 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-10-31Completed
Open Label Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial to Compare Immunogenicity of Insulin Glargine Ezelin vs Lantus in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Patients[NCT03352674]Phase 2133 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-09-30Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Plus Metformin With Insulin Glargine Plus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00619697]Phase 4260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Efficacy of Ipragliflozin Compared With Sitagliptin in Uncontrolled Type 2 Diabetes With Sulfonylurea and Metformin[NCT03076112]Phase 3170 participants (Actual)Interventional2017-04-25Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Addition of MK0431 to Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Who Have Inadequate Glycemic Control on Glimepiride Alone or in Combination With Metf[NCT00106704]Phase 3441 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-03-31Completed
Effect of Oral Combination Therapy of Metformin Extended Release Over Glimepiride in a Single Dosage Form in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Failure of Monotherapy[NCT00941161]Phase 428 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 52

To examine whether the mean change from baseline in HbA1c with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Intervention% HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-1.35
Titrated Glimepiride-0.98

Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) at Week 52

To examine whether the change from baseline in SBP with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-2.6
Titrated Glimepiride1.0

Change From Baseline in Total Body Weight at Week 52

To examine whether the mean change from baseline in total body weight with co-administered saxagliptin 5 mg and dapagliflozin 10 mg plus metformin is superior to titrated glimepiride plus metformin after 52 weeks of double-blind treatment. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg-3.11
Titrated Glimepiride0.95

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response, Defined as HbA1c < 7.0%, at Week 156

Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 156 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 156

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg21.4
Titrated Glimepiride11.7

Percentage of Subjects Achieving a Therapeutic Glycemic Response, Defined as HbA1c < 7.0%, at Week 52

Therapeutic glycemic response was defined as HbA1c <7.0%. Subjects rescued or discontinued prior to, and subjects with missing measurements at Week 52 were treated as non-responders. The percentage of subjects with a therapeutic glycemic response is based on the logistic regression method with adjustment for baseline HbA1c. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: At Week 52

InterventionPercentage of subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg44.3
Titrated Glimepiride34.3

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Intensification During the 156-Week Short-term Plus Long-Term Treatment Period.

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 156-week treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg37.0
Titrated Glimepiride55.6

Percentage of Subjects With Treatment Intensification During the 52-week Short-term Treatment Period

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after the 52-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 52 were counted as having an event for the analysis. The values presented are the percentage of subjects requiring the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control during the 52-week short -term treatment period. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Subjects (Number)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mg1.3
Titrated Glimepiride8.8

Time to Treatment Intensification During the 156-Week Short-term Plus Long-Term Treatment Period.

Treatment intensification was defined as the addition of insulin or other glucose-lowering agent for rescue therapy or discontinuation for lack of glycemic control. Time to treatment intensification was censored after 156-week treatment period if treatment intensification had not occurred by then. Subjects rescued at Week 156 were counted as having an event for the analysis. Time to treatment intensification curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared using a Cox proportional hazards model. (NCT02419612)
Timeframe: Up to Week 156

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Dapagliflozin 10mg and Saxagliptin 5mgNA
Titrated Glimepiride92.3

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 104 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent A1C (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.58
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.60
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.89

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 26 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent A1C (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.03
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.73
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.91

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 52 A1C minus the Week 0 A1C. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent A1C (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.68
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.72
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.96

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 104 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.18
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.77
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.63

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 26 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.33
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.01
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.93

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

The change in body weight from baseline reflects the Week 52 body weight minus the Week 0 body weight. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.07
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.23
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.35

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 104 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 104 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-10.9
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-18.2
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-28.2

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 26 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 26 minus FPG at Week 0) which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.85
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-27.54
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-39.10

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Therapy)

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 52 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 52 minus FPG at Week 0). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-12.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-22.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-35.2

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.46
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.36
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.52

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) minus the Week 0 sitting DBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.23
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.59
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.19

Change From Baseline in Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting DBP minus the Week 0 sitting DBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.38
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.40
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.19

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.05
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-3.61
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-3.13

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 26 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 26 sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) minus the Week 0 sitting SBP (which is estimated on average for each treatment group using a constrained longitudinal data analysis model, which allows for participants with missing data to be included in the analysis). Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.70
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-4.38
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-5.20

Change From Baseline in Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 sitting SBP minus the Week 0 sitting SBP. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.65
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-2.63
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-4.28

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.23
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.11
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.96

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.09
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.19
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.13

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-1.18
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.72
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-2.02

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.06
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.15
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.13

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.40
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.10
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.30

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercentage change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.22
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.01
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.12

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 26 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 26. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.63
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.55
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.36

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.44
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.59
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.39

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Femoral Neck Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.69
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.49
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.44

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Lumbar Spine (L1-L4) Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the femoral neck was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.10
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.28
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.07

Percent Change From Baseline in BMD at Week 52 as Measured by DXA at the Total Hip Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the total hip was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 52. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.82
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-1.04
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-1.32

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Carboxy-Terminal Cross-Linking Telopeptides of Type I Collagen (CTX) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride10.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg51.9
Ertugliflozin 15 mg80.2

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker CTX at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.29
Ertugliflozin 5 mg26.94
Ertugliflozin 15 mg32.53

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker CTX at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

CTX is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride15.54
Ertugliflozin 5 mg34.36
Ertugliflozin 15 mg41.57

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker P1NP at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.38
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.11
Ertugliflozin 15 mg24.21

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker P1NP at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride24.50
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.41
Ertugliflozin 15 mg19.79

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Parathyroid Hormone (PTH) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.98
Ertugliflozin 5 mg0.28
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.14

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker Procollagen Type I N-terminal Propeptide (P1NP) at Week 26 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

P1NP is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride0.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg0.8
Ertugliflozin 15 mg0.5

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker PTH at Week 104 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride10.12
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.16
Ertugliflozin 15 mg5.46

Percent Change From Baseline in Bone Biomarker PTH at Week 52 (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

PTH is a biochemical marker of bone resorption. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercent Change (Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride8.11
Ertugliflozin 5 mg11.09
Ertugliflozin 15 mg2.48

Percent Change From BMD at Week 104 as Measured by DXA at the Distal Forearm Using Raw Data (Excluding Bone Rescue Approach)

BMD at the distal forearm was assessed by DXA at Week 0 and Week 104. Participants who exhibited a significant reduction in BMD according to the protocol defined criteria completed an unscheduled DXA scan and, if required, received bone-active therapy. This table excludes measurements obtained after initiation of bone rescue medications. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Glimepiride-0.58
Ertugliflozin 5 mg-0.40
Ertugliflozin 15 mg-0.64

Percentage of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride2.4
Ertugliflozin 5 mg3.4
Ertugliflozin 15 mg3.9

Percentage of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE) (Including Rescue Approach)

An AE is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign including an abnormal laboratory finding, symptom or disease associated with the use of a medical treatment or procedure, regardless of whether it is considered related to the medical treatment or procedure, that occurs during the course of the study. Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with open-label glimepiride or basal insulin according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 106

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride77.5
Ertugliflozin 5 mg70.5
Ertugliflozin 15 mg75.6

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 104

Per protocol participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 104

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride24.4
Ertugliflozin 5 mg11.1
Ertugliflozin 15 mg10.7

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 26

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride17.7
Ertugliflozin 5 mg2.9
Ertugliflozin 15 mg1.5

Percentage of Participants Receiving Glycemic Rescue Therapy up to Week 52

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Up to Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride17.2
Ertugliflozin 5 mg4.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg1.5

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride7.2
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg12.2

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride2.9
Ertugliflozin 5 mg8.7
Ertugliflozin 15 mg12.2

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <6.5% (48 mmol/Mol) at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride11.0
Ertugliflozin 5 mg10.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg14.6

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 104 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time. Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride19.1
Ertugliflozin 5 mg24.6
Ertugliflozin 15 mg33.7

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 26 (Logistic Regression Using Multiple Imputation: Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride15.8
Ertugliflozin 5 mg35.3
Ertugliflozin 15 mg40.0

Percentage of Participants With an A1C of <7% (53 mmol/Mol) at Week 52 (Excluding Rescue Approach)

A1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Percentage A1C is the ratio of glycated hemoglobin to total hemoglobin x 100. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Placebo/Glimepiride30.6
Ertugliflozin 5 mg34.8
Ertugliflozin 15 mg36.6

Time to Glycemic Rescue Therapy at Week 26

Per protocol, participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionDays (Median)
Placebo/Glimepiride105
Ertugliflozin 5 mg112
Ertugliflozin 15 mg139

Ertugliflozin Plasma Concentrations (ng/mL): Summary Statistics Over Time (Excluding Rescue Approach)

Pharmacokinetic samples were collected at approximately 24 hours following the prior day's dose and before administration of the current day's dose. The lower limit of quantitation (LLOQ) was 0.500 mg/mL. Participants who met pre-specified glycemic criteria were rescued with oral tablets of open-label glimepiride or basal insulin injected subcutaneously, and dosed according to Investigator judgment. Per protocol, this data set excludes data for any participant after the initiation of glycemic rescue therapy. (NCT02033889)
Timeframe: Pre-dose and/or 60 minutes post-dose on Weeks 6, 12, 18, and 30

,,
Interventionng/mL (Mean)
Week 6:Pre-doseWeek 12:Pre-doseWeek 12:60 mins post-doseWeek 18:Pre-doseWeek 18:60 mins post-doseWeek 30:Pre-dose
Ertugliflozin 15 mg38.3829.23228.1324.46214.9630.55
Ertugliflozin 5 mg14.8912.3474.849.9174.3912.66
Placebo/GlimepirideNANANA0.010.010.15

2 hr Postprandial Glucose (PPG) Change From Baseline at Week 104

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 2 hr PPG minus the Baseline 2hr PPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline 2hr PPG and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin-28.47
Glimepiride-18.72

Body Weight Change From Baseline at Week 104

This key secondary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 104 body weight minus the baseline body weight. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline weight and the number of previous antidiabetic-medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionkg (Mean)
Linagliptin-1.39
Glimepiride1.29

Body Weight Change From Baseline at Week 52

This key secondary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 52 body weight minus the baseline body weight. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline weight and the number of previous antidiabetic-medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52

Interventionkg (Mean)
Linagliptin-1.12
Glimepiride1.38

Change in Baseline Lipid Parameter Cholesterol at Week 104

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin0
Glimepiride1

Change in Baseline Lipid Parameter HDL at Week 104

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Linagliptin1
Glimepiride0

Change in Baseline Lipid Parameter Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) at Week 104

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin1
Glimepiride3

Change in Baseline Lipid Parameter Triglyceride at Week 104

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin-11
Glimepiride-7

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 104

This change from baseline reflects the Week 104 FPG minus the Baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin-2.34
Glimepiride-8.72

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 52

This change from baseline reflects the Week 52 FPG minus the Baseline FPG. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c, baseline FPG and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Linagliptin-8.40
Glimepiride-15.24

HbA1c Change at Week 104

The Full Analysis Set (FAS) included all treated and randomized patients with a baseline and at least one on-treatment HbA1c measurement available during the first phase of the study. Last observation carried forward (LOCF) was used as imputation rule. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.21
Glimepiride-0.41

HbA1c Change at Week 12

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 12

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.43
Glimepiride-0.75

HbA1c Change at Week 16

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 16

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.45
Glimepiride-0.78

HbA1c Change at Week 28

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 28

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.43
Glimepiride-0.74

HbA1c Change at Week 4

Difference of base percent value [Week x(%) - baseline (%)] (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 4

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.26
Glimepiride-0.33

HbA1c Change at Week 40

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 40

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.42
Glimepiride-0.69

HbA1c Change at Week 52

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.41
Glimepiride-0.63

HbA1c Change at Week 65

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 65

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.32
Glimepiride-0.53

HbA1c Change at Week 78

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 78

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.22
Glimepiride-0.43

HbA1c Change at Week 8

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 8

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.37
Glimepiride-0.58

HbA1c Change at Week 91

(NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 91

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.21
Glimepiride-0.43

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 104

This co-primary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 104 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 104

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.16
Glimepiride-0.36

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 52

This co-primary endpoint, change from baseline, reflects the Week 52 HbA1c percent minus the baseline HbA1c percent. Means are treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and the number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 52

InterventionPercent (Mean)
Linagliptin-0.36
Glimepiride-0.57

Incidence of Hypoglycaemic Events up to 104 Weeks

A hypoglycaemic event is defined as patient showing clinical signs suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by a HBGM of below 55 mg/dl (3.1 mmol/L) (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPatients (Number)
Linagliptin58
Glimepiride280

Incidence of Hypoglycaemic Events up to 52 Weeks

A hypoglycaemic event is defined as patient showing clinical signs suggestive of low blood glucose confirmed by a home blood glucose monitoring (HBGM) of below 55 mg/dl (3.1 mmol/L) (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPatients (Number)
Linagliptin41
Glimepiride249

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 104

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 104, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 6.5%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 104 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 6.5%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Linagliptin10.9
Glimepiride14.7

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 52

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 6.5% at week 52, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 6.5%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 52 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 6.5%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Linagliptin16.9
Glimepiride22.7

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 104

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7.0% at week 104, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 104 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 7.0%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Linagliptin21.0
Glimepiride28.3

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 52

The percentage of patients with an HbA1c value below 7.0% at week 52, based upon patients with baseline HbA1c >= 7%. If a patient did not have an HbA1c value at week 52 they were considered a failure, so HbA1c >= 7.0%. The logistic regression is treatment adjusted for baseline HbA1c and number of previous anti-diabetic medications. (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Linagliptin29.6
Glimepiride38.9

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 104

Occurrence of relative efficacy response, defined as a lowering of 0.5% HbA1c at week 104 (NCT00622284)
Timeframe: Week 104

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Linagliptin26.2
Glimepiride33.5

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-5.6
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-56.9

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-4.5
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-21.0

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

InterventionPercent of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-0.20
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-0.94

Change From Baseline in the Areas Under the Curve From 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2h) for Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT01026194)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours post-dose at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg*h / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Teneli + Pio-13.722
Teneli/Teneli + Pio-85.031

Change From Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline 2-hour Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo / Teneli + SU6.0
Teneli / Teneli + SU-43.1

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline Fasting Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg / dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo / Teneli + SU9.8
Teneli / Teneli + SU-17.3

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12

The change from Baseline in HbA1c (the concentration of glucose bound to hemoglobin as a percent of the absolute maximum that can be bound) collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo / Teneli + SU0.29
Teneli / Teneli + SU-0.71

Change From Baseline in the Areas Under the Curve From 0 to 2 h (AUC0-2h) for Postprandial Plasma Glucose at Week 12

The change from Baseline in AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose collected at Week 12. Least squares means were derived from an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment as a fixed effect and baseline AUC0-2h for Postprandial Plasma Glucose as a covariate. (NCT00974090)
Timeframe: 0, 0.5, 1, 2 hours post-dose at Week 0 and Week 12

Interventionmg・hr/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo / Teneli + SU15.514
Teneli / Teneli + SU-65.544

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 24

Change in FPG from baseline to Week 24 or LOCF was assessed with an ANCOVA approach similar to that of the primary efficacy endpoint. (NCT00971243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Teneli 5mg+Met-15.54
Teneli 10mg+Met-13.65
Teneli 20mg+Met-17.84
Teneli 40mg+Met-21.85
Placebo+Met-3.51

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24

The change of HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 or a last observation carried forward (LOCF), was assessed with an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model, with the centre and treatment effect as factors and the baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT00971243)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 24

Interventionpercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Teneli 5mg+Met-0.58
Teneli 10mg+Met-0.68
Teneli 20mg+Met-0.76
Teneli 40mg+Met-0.91
Placebo+Met-0.28

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.65
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.74
Glimepiride-0.55

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.82
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.93
Glimepiride-0.81

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.7
Glimepiride1.0

Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg4.9
Glimepiride34.2

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date)and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma glucose value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionmmol/L (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.73
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-1.29

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in HbA1c.

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), and the last pre-randomisation HbA1c value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

Intervention% of glycosylated hemoglobin (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-0.44
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-0.64

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in Insulin

Measured as the difference between the last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the first day after the last dosing date) and the last pre-randomisation fasting plasma insulin value, as determined by central laboratory. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

InterventionµU/mL (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg-2.0
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg-0.6

Change From Baseline to Week 52 in β-cell Function (as Measured by Homeostasis Model Assessment-β [HOMA-β]

β-cell function as estimated by the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) model. Value is derived from FPG and fasting insulin; fasting insulin values below 2.074 μU/mL or above 57.595 μU/mL and FPG values below 3 mmol/L or above 25 mmol/L are excluded (as restricted by the calculation method used). Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionpercentage of change from baseline (Mean)
Saxagliptin 5 mg3.83
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg16.22

Proportion of Patients Achieving a Therapeutic Glycaemic Response at Week 52 Defined as HbA1c <7.0%

Proportion of patients with their last on-treatment value (defined as obtained before or on the 8th day after the last dosing date), as determined by central laboratory, below the specified limits. Full analysis set. (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52

Interventionpercentage of responders (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg44.7
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg54.7

Proportion of Patients Having Experienced at Least One Hypoglycaemic Event (Confirmed or Severe) Over the 52-week Double-blind Treatment Period.

"Hypoglyceamic event defined as, Confirmed hypoglycaemia: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration. Safety analysis set." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

Interventionpercentage of patients (Number)
Saxagliptin 5 mg1.1
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg15.3

Proportion of Patients Reaching HbA1c <7% After 52 Weeks of Treatment Without Confirmed or Severe Hypoglycaemia.

"Defined as obtained on or before the 8th day after the last dosing day, as determined by central laboratory. Safety analysis set.~Confirmed hypoglycaemia defined as: any event defined as either a symptomatic event with blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL) and no need for external assistance, or an asymptomatic blood glucose measurement <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL).~Major (or severe) hypoglycaemia defined as: symptomatic events requiring external assistance due to severe impairment in consciousness or behaviour, with or without blood glucose level <3 mmol/L (<54 mg/dL), but with prompt recovery after glucose or glucagon administration. These events may be associated with sufficient neuroglycopenia to induce seizure or coma. Plasma glucose measurements may not be available during such an event, but neurological recovery, attributable to the restoration of plasma glucose to normal, was considered sufficient evidence that the event was induced by a low plasma glucose concentration." (NCT01006603)
Timeframe: From week 0 to week 52.

,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
All patientspatients aged <75 years (n=217, n=216)patients aged ≥75 years (n=142, n=143)
Glimepiride 1 - 6 mg38.233.345.5
Saxagliptin 5 mg37.939.235.9

Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Year 3

Change in Body weight from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-3.92
Glim + Met1.47

Change in DI30/DG30 Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in DI30/DG30 ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.10
Glim + Met0.91

Change in Disposition Index From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in disposition index from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met9.15
Glim + Met1.82

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.87
Glim + Met-0.41

Change in Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio From Baseline to Endpoint.

Change in fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.03
Glim + Met0.05

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HbA1c from baseline to endpoint. Endpoint for HbA1c was defined as the HbA1c measured at the treatment failure for patients reaching primary endpoint and was the last observation in study period II for other patients (either followed until the end of the study period II or discontinuing the study). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.36
Glim + Met-0.21

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Not Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized-0.47

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 2 for Patients Randomized at Entry in Period III

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 2. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline in Period III, Year 2 in Period III

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met + Glim - Randomized-0.19
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized-0.47

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Year 3

Change in HbA1c from baseline to Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, Year 3 in Period II

Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-0.30
Glim + Met-0.12

Change in HOMA-B From Baseline to Endpoint

Change in HOMA-B from baseline to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met5.56
Glim + Met19.92

Change in Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose From Baseline to Endpoint

Change from baseline in postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose to endpoint. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline, end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met-2.72
Glim + Met-0.53

Diastolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Diastolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met77.45
Glim + Met79.16

Disposition Index at Year 3

Disposition Index at Year 3. Disposition index was calculated as (DI30/DG30 ratio)/(HOMA index for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR)); where HOMA-IR=(fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L) x fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L))/(22.5 x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.56
Glim + Met7.89

Fasting Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Fasting plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met7.27
Glim + Met7.96

Fasting Proinsulin/Insulin Ratio at Year 3

Fasting proinsulin (measured in pmol/L)/insulin (measured in pmol/L) ratio at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met0.22
Glim + Met0.23

Heart Rate at Year 3

Heart rate at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionbeats per minute (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met73.51
Glim + Met74.23

High-density Lipoprotein (HDL) Cholesterol at Year 3

HDL Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.31
Glim + Met1.25

Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA-B) at Year 3

HOMA-B at Year 3. HOMA-B is an index of beta-cell function and was calculated as: HOMA-B = (20 x fasting insulin (measured in pmol/L))/((fasting glucose (measured in mmol/L) - 3.5) x 7.175). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met66.86
Glim + Met68.52

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionevents per subject-year (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.52
Glim + Met5.32

Hypoglycemia Rate Per Year in Period III

All hypoglycemia episodes were taken into account. Severe hypoglycemia: event requiring assistance of another person to administer carbohydrate, glucagons, or other resuscitative actions; Documented symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with typical symptoms accompanied by a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Asymptomatic hypoglycemia: event not accompanied by typical symptoms but with a measured plasma glucose concentration <=70 mg/dL; Probable symptomatic hypoglycemia: event with symptoms not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Start of Period III to end of study

Interventionevents per subject-year (Mean)
Exen + Metformin + Glim - Randomized2.78
Exen + Met + Pio or Rosi - Randomized0.60
Glim + Met + Exen - Not Randomized4.62

Postprandial (2 Hours) Plasma Glucose at Year 3

Postprandial (2 hours) plasma glucose at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met12.65
Glim + Met15.45

Ratio of the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Insulin Concentration and the 30 Minute Increment in Plasma Glucose During the Oral Glucose Tolerance Test (DI30/DG30 Ratio) at Year 3

DI30/DG30 at Year 3. DI30/DG30 ratio was calculated as (30 minute post prandial insulin - fasting insulin) (measured in pmol/L)/(30 minute post prandial glucose - fasting glucose) (measured in mmol/L). (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionratio (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met25.81
Glim + Met26.38

Systolic Blood Pressure at Year 3

Systolic Blood pressure at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met130.58
Glim + Met135.78

Time to Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

Interventionweek (Median)
Exen + Met180.0
Glim + Met142.1

Total Cholesterol at Year 3

Total Cholesterol at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met4.77
Glim + Met4.75

Triglycerides at Year 3

Triglycerides at Year 3. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Year 3 in Period II

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Exen + Met1.69
Glim + Met1.95

Number of Patients With Treatment Failure

Treatment failure is defined as one of the following:1. HbA1c exceeding 9% at any visit after the initial 3 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 6), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. 2. HbA1c exceeding 7% at 2 consecutive visits 3 months apart, after the initial 6 months of treatment (i.e., earliest at Month 9), on the maximally tolerated dose of antidiabetic agents. (NCT00359762)
Timeframe: Baseline to end of Period II (up to 4.5 years)

,
Interventionnumber of patients (Number)
Number of patients with treatment failureNumber of patients censored
Exen + Met203287
Glim + Met262225

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median of 1 and 2 events per participant was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionevents per participant (Median)
Placebo0
PF-04937319 10 mg0
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg0
Glimepiride0

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal [LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo56
PF-04937319 10 mg52
PF-04937319 50 mg56
PF-04937319 100 mg54
Glimepiride51

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE was defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Placebo4.9
PF-04937319 10 mg3.3
PF-04937319 50 mg4.9
PF-04937319 100 mg6.6
Glimepiride34.4

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 14 (follow-up)

,,,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Mean)
Baseline (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 60)Change at Week 2 (n=59, 57, 58, 61, 58)Change at Week 4 (n=58, 56, 55, 59, 60)Change at Week 6 (n=57, 54, 55, 59, 56)Change at Week 8 (n=58, 54, 53, 58, 56)Change at Week 12 (n=56, 52, 53, 55, 54)Change at Week 14 (n=55, 51, 53, 55, 53)
Glimepiride90.388-0.0240.3100.4730.4931.2111.234
PF-04937319 10 mg89.518-0.069-0.378-0.604-0.522-0.685-0.472
PF-04937319 100 mg87.530-0.021-0.284-0.290-0.397-0.545-0.573
PF-04937319 50 mg89.860-0.028-0.074-0.228-0.311-0.961-0.978
Placebo89.859-0.402-0.620-0.564-1.082-1.529-1.478

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 2, 4, 6, 8 and 12

(NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8, 12

,,,,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 61)Change at Week 2 (n=60, 59, 60, 61, 59)Change at Week 4 (n=59, 58, 56, 59, 60)Change at Week 6 (n=58, 56, 56, 59, 57)Change at Week 8 (n=59, 56, 54, 58, 57)Change at Week 12 (n=57, 54, 54, 55, 55)
Glimepiride163.7-19.9-26.2-23.4-26.9-22.5
PF-04937319 10 mg168.7-2.0-8.4-6.9-7.0-6.2
PF-04937319 100 mg160.4-10.5-11.4-10.4-13.0-10.3
PF-04937319 50 mg174.7-7.9-7.7-7.2-13.0-9.9
Placebo161.33.1-0.5-2.60.93.4

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline (n=59, 57, 55, 60, 60)Change at Week 12 (n=56, 53, 53, 54, 54)
Glimepiride8.12-1.01
PF-04937319 10 mg7.97-0.18
PF-04937319 100 mg7.88-0.64
PF-04937319 50 mg7.91-0.45
Placebo7.90-0.13

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4, 6 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1C was reported. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 6, 8

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Week 4 (n=58, 57, 55, 58, 60)Week 6 (n=57, 55, 55, 58, 55)Week 8 (n=58, 55, 53, 57, 55)
Glimepiride-0.54-0.78-0.89
PF-04937319 10 mg-0.07-0.14-0.17
PF-04937319 100 mg-0.32-0.51-0.59
PF-04937319 50 mg-0.22-0.22-0.38
Placebo-0.08-0.14-0.19

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG) Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase from baseline in ECG data were reported. Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline value was >200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline value was <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]); QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >= 30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%QRS interval: Percent change of >=50%QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msecQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec
Glimepiride0141
PF-04937319 10 mg0152
PF-04937319 100 mg0262
PF-04937319 50 mg1182
Placebo0062

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)
Glimepiride5215
PF-04937319 10 mg1333
PF-04937319 100 mg3456
PF-04937319 50 mg3032
Placebo2154

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose of study treatment (up to 101 days)

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Glimepiride361
PF-04937319 10 mg281
PF-04937319 100 mg291
PF-04937319 50 mg312
Placebo260

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than 6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of less than 6.5 percent and less than 7 percent. (NCT01517373)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Less Than 6.5 PercentLess Than 7 Percent
Glimepiride18.245.5
PF-04937319 10 mg1331.5
PF-04937319 100 mg27.352.7
PF-04937319 50 mg18.527.8
Placebo7.026.3

Number of Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episodes Per Participant

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. Median number of events per participant was reported (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionevents per participant (Median)
Metformin 500 mg0
Placebo0
PF-04937319 3 mg0
PF-04937319 20 mg0
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg0
Sitagliptin 100 mg0

Number of Participants With Abnormal Laboratory Values

Hemoglobin,hematocrit,red blood cells(RBC) count:less than [<]0.8*lower limit of normal[LLN],platelets:<0.5*LLN/greater than [>]1.75*upper limit of normal [ULN],white blood cells(WBC):<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,lymphocytes,total neutrophils:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN, basophils,eosinophil,monocytes:>1.2*ULN;aspartate aminotransferase,alanine aminotransferase, alkaline phosphatase:>0.3*ULN,total protein,albumin:<0.8*LLN or >1.2*ULN;total bilirubin,direct bilirubin,indirect bilirubin:>1.5*ULN;triglycerides,cholesterol:>1.3*ULN, HDL:<0.8*LLN, LDL:>1.2*ULN,blood urea nitrogen,creatinine:>1.3*ULN,uric acid:>1.2*ULN;sodium: <0.95*LLN or >1.05*ULN,potassium,chloride,calcium,bicarbonate:<0.9*LLN or >1.1*ULN;creatine kinase:>2.0*ULN;glucose:<0.6*LLN or >1.5*ULN,urine WBC and RBC:>= 20/High Power Field [HPF]),urine epithelial cells (>=1 HPF),urine bacteria >20 high-powered field;qualitative urine glucose,urine blood to Hgb ratio (>=1);urine(protein,nitrite,mucus,leukocyte >=1 in urine dipstick test). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionparticipants (Number)
Placebo46
PF-04937319 3 mg49
PF-04937319 20 mg45
PF-04937319 50 mg46
PF-04937319 100 mg53
Sitagliptin 100 mg43

Percentage of Participants With at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Events (HAE) Episode

A hypoglycemic event (HAE) was identified by characteristic symptoms or blood glucose levels. HAE is defined as 1 of the given definitions: Characteristic symptoms of HAE with no home glucose monitoring performed where clinical picture included prompt resolution with food intake, subcutaneous glucagon, or intravenous glucose; or characteristic symptoms of HAE with home glucose monitoring measurement =< 70 milligram per deciliter (mg/dL) using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<74 mg/dL using International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers; or any laboratory glucose value, meeting the following criterion with or without accompanying symptoms: =<49 mg/dL using ACCU-CHEK plasma-referenced home glucometers or =<53 mg/dL using IFCC referenced ACCU-CHEK or central laboratory glucometers. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
Metformin 500 mg0
Placebo0
PF-04937319 3 mg0
PF-04937319 20 mg1
PF-04937319 50 mg0
PF-04937319 100 mg2
Sitagliptin 100 mg1

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8 , 12 , 14

,,,,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Mean)
Baseline (n=55, 55, 50, 56, 54, 55)Change at Week 2 (n=54, 55, 49, 56, 53, 55)Change at Week 4 (n=51, 55, 49, 55, 53, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=49, 53, 45, 52, 50, 52)Change at Week 12 (n=47, 52, 45, 52, 50, 53)Change at Week 14 (n=44, 52, 44, 52, 50, 53)
PF-04937319 100 mg91.239-0.053-0.374-0.475-0.623-0.916
PF-04937319 20 mg88.371-0.052-0.192-0.510-0.455-0.613
PF-04937319 3 mg87.8650.4350.214-0.003-0.1420.011
PF-04937319 50 mg88.066-0.283-0.203-0.270-0.352-0.492
Placebo86.446-0.239-0.704-0.823-0.804-0.588
Sitagliptin 100 mg87.025-0.384-0.353-0.702-0.917-1.172

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12 and 14

(NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 1, 2, 4, 8, 12, 14

,,,,,
Interventionmilligram per deciliter (mg/dL) (Mean)
Baseline (n=56, 56, 52, 56, 55, 55)Change at Week 2 (n=54, 56, 50, 56, 54, 55)Change at Week 4 (n=52, 56, 51, 55, 54, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=50, 54, 47, 52, 51, 52)Change at Week 12 (n=48, 53, 47, 52, 51, 53)Change at Week 14 (n=45, 53, 46, 52, 51, 53)
PF-04937319 100 mg164.8-10.8-9.6-6.53.510.2
PF-04937319 20 mg155.1-3.2-0.2-2.5-3.8-3.1
PF-04937319 3 mg159.80.7-0.30.7-2.5-3.5
PF-04937319 50 mg166.1-6.8-8.3-15.2-10.8-1.0
Placebo168.3-5.2-1.8-3.1-7.5-5.9
Sitagliptin160.7-13.6-19.3-15.4-12.9-2.6

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as less than (<) 6.5 percent (%) by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1), Week 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Baseline (n=50,55,48,55,53,53)Change at Week 12 (n=46,52,45,52,50,53)
PF-04937319 100 mg8.31-0.80
PF-04937319 20 mg7.80-0.53
PF-04937319 3 mg8.00-0.33
PF-04937319 50 mg8.15-0.59
Placebo8.01-0.42
Sitagliptin7.89-0.79

Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1C) at Week 2, 4 and 8

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used. Change from baseline in percentage of HbA1c in participants were reported. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline(Day 1), Week 2, 4, 8

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of hemoglobin (Mean)
Change at Week 4 (n= 50, 55, 48, 55, 53, 53)Change at Week 8 (n=48, 53, 45, 52, 50, 51)
PF-04937319 100 mg-0.50-0.86
PF-04937319 20 mg-0.32-0.46
PF-04937319 3 mg-0.24-0.32
PF-04937319 50 mg-0.35-0.50
Placebo-0.20-0.36
Sitagliptin-0.52-0.77

Number of Participants With Increase From Baseline Electrocardiogram (ECG)Data

Criteria for increase from baseline data: PR interval (percent change of greater than or equal to [>=] 25/50% [if baseline>200 then percent change of >25% counts; if baseline <=200 then percent change of >50% counts]; QRS complex (percent change of >=50%); QT Fridericia's correction (QTcF) interval (change of >=30 to <60 millisecond [msec], and change of >=60 msec). (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
PR interval: Percent change of >=25/50%QRS interval: Percent change of >=50%QTcF interval: Change of >=30 to <60 msecQTcF interval: Change of >=60 msec
PF-04937319 100 mg1132
PF-04937319 20 mg0130
PF-04937319 3 mg1150
PF-04937319 50 mg0131
Placebo0071
Sitagliptin2170

Number of Participants With Increase/Decrease From Baseline Vital Signs Data

Participants who met the criteria for increase or decrease in vital signs data were reported. Criteria for increase or decrease from baseline vital signs data: sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) of >=30 millimeter of mercury (mmHg); sitting diastolic BP of >=20 mmHg and pulse rate was based on investigator's discretion. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to Week 14

,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Increase in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Increase in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)Decrease in systolic BP (>=30 mmHg)Decrease in diastolic BP (>=20 mmHg)
PF-04937319 100 mg3423
PF-04937319 20 mg2016
PF-04937319 3 mg2421
PF-04937319 50 mg1111
Placebo1112
Sitagliptin2211

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) or Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 14 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious adverse events. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) up to 14 days after last dose (up to 101 days)

,,,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
AEsSAEs
Metformin 500 mg370
PF-04937319 100 mg241
PF-04937319 20 mg191
PF-04937319 3 mg190
PF-04937319 50 mg160
Placebo191
Sitagliptin 100 mg180

Percentage of Participants Achieving Less Than 6.5 Percent and Less Than 7 Percent Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Levels at Week 12

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin which is measured primarily to identify the average glycemic control over prolonged periods of time. The normal range for the HbA1c test, was identified as <6.5 percent by the study-specific central laboratory used and data are presented in categories of <6.5 percent and <7 percent. (NCT01475461)
Timeframe: Week 12

,,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
<6.5 percent<7 percent
PF-04937319 100 mg17.639.2
PF-04937319 20 mg19.142.6
PF-04937319 3 mg9.426.4
PF-04937319 50 mg15.430.8
Placebo12.522.9
Sitagliptin32.156.6

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 30 to determine the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.32
Glimepiride-0.51

LS Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 30

Plasma samples were collected from participants after an overnight fast at baseline and Week 30 to determine the mean change from baseline in participant FPG. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-14.5
Glimepiride-21.2

LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Body Weight at Week 30

Participants were only permitted to wear a drape gown and undergarments (no street clothes, no shoes or socks) for this evaluation. Body weight was measured after voiding (to the nearest 0.1 kg) and measurements were collected until 2 consecutive measurements did not differ by more than 0.2 kg from each other. Body weight measurements were evaluated using a standardized, calibrated digital scale and was reported in kilograms (kg) at baseline and Week 30. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin0.4
Glimepiride1.1

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to An AE

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin3
Glimepiride4

Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE)

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin118
Glimepiride115

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Up to Week 30

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an episode with clinical symptoms attributed to hypoglycemia, without regard to glucose level. Participants were instructed to complete the Hypoglycemia Assessment Log (HAL) for any symptomatic episodes he or she believed represent hypoglycemia. If a fingerstick glucose was obtained before or shortly (i.e., within a few minutes) after treating, the value was recorded in the HAL. In addition, participants were instructed to record in the HAL any fingerstick glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) regardless of the presence of clinical symptoms. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin2
Glimepiride11

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30. Hemoglobin A1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin9.1
Glimepiride20.9

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin33.5
Glimepiride46.6

Change From Baseline to 52 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52 weeks

Interventionpercentage of glycosylated hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.08
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.76
Insulin Glargine-0.63

Change From Baseline to 26 Weeks and 78 Weeks Endpoint in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c)

Least Squares (LS) means were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline HbA1c as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26 weeks, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine-0.65-0.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.89-0.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.16-0.90

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Mass Index

Body mass index (BMI) is an estimate of body fat based on body weight divided by height squared. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilograms per square meter (kg/m^2) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 238)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine0.440.620.59
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.50-0.39-0.39
LY2189265 1.5 mg-0.64-0.64-0.64

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Body Weight

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionkilogram (kg) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine1.011.441.28
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.47-1.33-1.54
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.82-1.87-1.96

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks for Daily Mean Blood Glucose Values From the 8-point Self-monitored Blood Glucose (SMBG) Profiles

The self-monitored blood glucose (SMBG) data were collected at the following 8 time points: pre-morning meal; 2 hours post-morning meal; pre-midday meal; 2 hours post-midday meal; pre-evening meal; 2 hours post-evening meal; bedtime; and 3 AM or 5 hours after bedtime. Least Squares (LS) means of the mean of the 8 time points (Daily Mean) were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=199, 204, 190)52 weeks (n=180, 185, 176)78 weeks (n=172, 164, 168)
Insulin Glargine-1.58-1.44-1.47
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.46-1.32-1.15
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.79-1.69-1.55

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the EuroQol 5 Dimension

The European Quality of Life - 5 dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire is a generic, multidimensional, health-related, quality-of-life instrument. It consists of 2 parts: the first part assesses 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) that have 3 possible levels of response (no problem, some problem, or extreme problem). These dimensions are converted into a weighted health-state Index Score. The EQ-5D United Kingdom (UK) score ranges from -0.59 to 1.0, where a score of 1.0 indicates perfect health and negative values are valued as worse than dead. The second part of the questionnaire consists of a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) on which the participants rated their perceived health state on that day from 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health). Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) and adjusted by treatment, country, and baseline. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
EQ-5D UK, 26 weeks (n=257, 254, 249)EQ-5D UK, 52 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)EQ-5D UK, 78 weeks (n=259, 260, 253)VAS, 26 weeks (n=253, 252, 243)VAS, 52 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)VAS, 78 weeks (n=260, 258, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.01-0.040.000.81.12.2
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.003.42.33.2
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.010.013.33.23.8

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living

"The Impact of Weight on Activities of Daily Living questionnaire (renamed the Ability to Perform Physical Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire [APPADL]) contains 7 items that assess how difficult it is for participants to engage in certain activities considered to be integral to normal daily life, such as walking, standing and climbing stairs. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = not at all difficult and 1 = unable to do. The individual scores from all 7 items are summed and a single total score is calculated and may range between 7 and 35. A higher score indicates better ability to perform activities of daily living. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate." (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=256, 256, 248)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 249)
Insulin Glargine-0.3-0.6-0.3
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.10.40.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.70.91.0

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Impact of Weight on Self-Perception

The Impact of Weight on Self-Perception (IW-SP) questionnaire contains 3 items that assess how often the participants' body weight affects how happy they are with their appearance and how often they feel self-conscious when out in public. Items are scored on a 5-point numeric rating scale where 5 = never and 1 = always. A single total score is calculated by summing the scores for all 3 items. Total score ranges between 3 and 15, where a higher score is indicative of better self-perception. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=258, 258, 251)52 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)78 weeks (n=260, 261, 252)
Insulin Glargine-0.10.10.1
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.20.20.3
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.10.50.5

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks in the Low Blood Sugar Survey

The Low Blood Sugar Survey (LBSS) contains 33 items comprised of 2 subscales (behavior and worry), each of which is rated on a 5-point numeric rating scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always). It captures behavioral changes associated with the concerns and experiences of hypoglycemia and the degree to which participants are worried about certain aspects associated with hypoglycemia during the previous 4 weeks. The behavior (or avoidance) subscale has 15 items, and the worry (or affect) subscale has 18 items. Subscale scores are calculated by summing participant responses to items (behavior range 0-60; worry range 0-72). A total score is calculated as the sum of both subscales (range 0-132). Higher scores indicate greater negative impact on subscales and total score. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits on a scale (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=255, 255, 244)52 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)78 weeks (n=258, 259, 245)
Insulin Glargine0.3-1.0-2.0
LY2189265 0.75 mg-2.4-4.1-4.7
LY2189265 1.5 mg-2.8-4.2-4.6

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Fridericia Corrected QT (QTcF) Interval and PR Interval

The QT interval is a measure of the time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data using Fridericia's formula: QTc = QT/RR^0.33. Corrected QT (QTc) is the QT interval corrected for heart rate and RR, which is the interval between two R waves. PR is the interval between the P wave and the QRS complex. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliseconds (msec) (Least Squares Mean)
QTcF interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)QTcF interval, 52 weeks (n=231, 240, 228)QTcF interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)PR interval, 26 weeks (n=240, 245, 229)PR interval, 52 weeks (n=230, 240, 227)PR interval, 78 weeks (n=221, 220, 222)
Insulin Glargine1.243.704.441.241.501.21
LY2189265 0.75 mg-0.101.343.442.331.883.27
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.711.551.662.782.612.62

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Electrocardiogram Parameters, Heart Rate

Electrocardiogram (ECG) heart rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=241, 247, 231)52 weeks (n=232, 242, 231)78 weeks (n=223, 222, 225)
Insulin Glargine-1.24-1.01-0.26
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.900.380.47
LY2189265 1.5 mg2.642.412.49

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pancreatic Enzymes

Amylase (total and pancreas-derived) and lipase concentrations were measured. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionunits/liter (Median)
Amylase (total), 26 weeksAmylase (total), 52 weeksAmylase (total), 78 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 26 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 52 weeksAmylase (pancreas-derived), 78 weeksLipase, 26 weeksLipase, 52 weeksLipase, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine2.0003.0001.0001.0001.0000.000-1.000-1.000-2.000
LY2189265 0.75 mg4.0005.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000
LY2189265 1.5 mg4.0004.0004.0003.0003.0002.0005.0004.0004.000

Change From Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Serum Calcitonin

(NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicogram/milliliter (Mean)
26 weeks (n=266, 267, 258)52 weeks (n=266, 269, 259)78 weeks (n=267, 269, 259)
Insulin Glargine0.1490.1760.151
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.0970.1320.035
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.1630.1280.086

Change From Baseline to 26, 52, and 78 Weeks on Blood Pressure

Sitting systolic blood pressure (SBP) and sitting diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionmilliliter of mercury (mmHG) (Least Squares Mean)
SBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)SBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)SBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)DBP, 26 weeks (n=257, 261, 245)DBP, 52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)DBP, 78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-0.030.510.51-0.29-0.93-1.04
LY2189265 0.75 mg-1.600.09-0.59-0.17-0.19-0.36
LY2189265 1.5 mg-1.280.17-0.70-0.16-0.26-0.44

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Glucagon Concentration

Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with country and treatment as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionpicomoles per liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
52 weeks (n=232, 231, 228)78 weeks (n=235, 235, 232)
Insulin Glargine-3.85-3.65
LY2189265 0.75 mg-3.31-3.37
LY2189265 1.5 mg-3.91-3.57

Change From Baseline to 52 and 78 Weeks in Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Beta-cell Function (HOMA2-%B) and Updated Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Sensitivity (HOMA2-%S)

The homeostatic model assessment (HOMA) is a method used to quantify insulin resistance and beta (β)-cell function. HOMA2-B is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate steady state beta cell function (%B) as a percentage of a normal reference population (normal young adults). HOMA2-S is a computer model that uses fasting plasma insulin and glucose concentrations to estimate insulin sensitivity (%S), as percentages of a normal reference population (normal young adults). The normal reference population for both HOMA2-B and HOMA-2S were set at 100%. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline of C-peptide based HOMA2-%B and HOMA2-%S were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 52, and 78 weeks

,
Interventionpercentage of HOMA2 (Least Squares Mean)
HOMA2-%B, 52 weeks (n=175, 181)HOMA2-%B, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)HOMA2-%S, 52 weeks (n=175,181)HOMA2-%S, 78 weeks (n=167, 165)
LY2189265 0.75 mg24.6015.66-2.66-3.62
LY2189265 1.5 mg29.9528.54-2.89-2.64

Change in Baseline to 26, 52 and 78 Weeks on Pulse Rate

Sitting pulse rate was measured. Least Squares (LS) means of change from baseline were calculated using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures (MMRM) with treatment, country, visit, and treatment-by-visit interaction as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionbeats per minute (bpm) (Least Squares Mean)
26 weeks (n=257, 260, 245)52 weeks (n=250, 252, 240)78 weeks (n=246, 244, 238)
Insulin Glargine-1.21-0.52-0.91
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.740.510.61
LY2189265 1.5 mg1.561.291.31

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than 7% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than 7.0% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine848079
LY2189265 0.75 mg1229991
LY2189265 1.5 mg153140129

Number of Participants Achieving Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) Less Than or Equal to 6.5% at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Number of participants achieving HbA1c levels less than or equal to 6.5% was analyzed with a logistic regression model with baseline, country, and treatment as factors included in the model. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks (n=263, 266, 258)52 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)78 weeks (n=263, 267, 259)
Insulin Glargine403543
LY2189265 0.75 mg746059
LY2189265 1.5 mg977174

Number of Participants Requiring Additional Intervention Due to Hyperglycemia at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Additional intervention was defined as any additional therapeutic intervention in participants who developed persistent, severe hyperglycemia despite full compliance with the assigned therapeutic regimen, or initiation of an alternative antihyperglycemic medication following study drug discontinuation. The number of participants requiring additional intervention due to hyperglycemia is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0816
LY2189265 0.75 mg42034
LY2189265 1.5 mg21124

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Cardiovascular Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Information on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was collected at baseline. Data on any new CV event was prospectively collected using a CV event electronic case report form. At prespecified visits, participants were asked about any new CV event. Deaths and nonfatal cardiovascular adverse events (AEs) were adjudicated by a committee of physicians with cardiology expertise external to the Sponsor. The nonfatal cardiovascular AEs to be adjudicated include myocardial infarction, hospitalization for unstable angina, hospitalization for heart failure, coronary interventions (such as coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention), and cerebrovascular events including cerebrovascular accident (stroke) and transient ischemic attack. The number of participants with adjudicated CV events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
Any CV event, 26 weeksAny fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 26 weeksAny CV event, 52 weeksAny fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny non-fatal CV event, 52 weeksAny CV event, 78 weekAny fatal CV event, 78 weekAny non-fatal CV event, 78 week
Insulin Glargine303615918
LY2189265 0.75 mg101404616
LY2189265 1.5 mg202303303

Number of Participants With Adjudicated Pancreatitis at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

The number of participants with pancreatitis confirmed by adjudication is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine000
LY2189265 0.75 mg111
LY2189265 1.5 mg122

Number of Participants With LY2189265 Antibodies at 26, 52, 78 Weeks and 4 Weeks After Last Dose of Study Drug (83 Weeks Maximum)

LY2189265 (Dulaglutide) anti-drug antibodies (ADA) were assessed at baseline, 26, 52, and 78 weeks, and at the safety follow-up visit 30 days after study drug discontinuation (83 weeks). The number of participants with initial postbaseline detection of treatment emergent (defined as a 4-fold increase in the ADA titer from baseline) LY2189265 ADA at each time point were summarized. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline, 26, 52, 78, and 83 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks83 weeks
LY2189265 1.5 mg and 0.75 mg11310

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an event that first occurs or worsens (increases in severity) after baseline regardless of causality or severity. The number of participants with one or more TEAE is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
26 weeks52 weeks78 weeks
Insulin Glargine137175192
LY2189265 0.75 mg146175188
LY2189265 1.5 mg160189201

Number of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The number of self-reported hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine122447789103360910931358240519635202226
LY2189265 0.75 mg000315444515484709911117147184192428
LY2189265 1.5 mg112311515607500757884145185215111720

Rate of Self-reported Hypoglycemic Events at 26, 52 and 78 Weeks

Hypoglycemic events (HE) were classified as severe (defined as episodes requiring the assistance of another person to actively administer resuscitative actions), documented symptomatic (defined as any time a participant feels that he/she is experiencing symptoms and/or signs associated with hypoglycemia, and has a plasma glucose level of =<3.9 mmol/L), asymptomatic (defined as events not accompanied by typical symptoms of hypoglycemia but with a measured plasma glucose of =<3.9 mmol/L), nocturnal (defined as any hypoglycemic event that occurred between bedtime and waking), or probable symptomatic (defined as events during which symptoms of hypoglycemia were not accompanied by a plasma glucose determination). The 1-year adjusted rate of hypoglycemic events is summarized cumulatively at 26, 52, and 78 weeks. A summary of serious and other non-serious adverse events regardless of causality is located in the Reported Adverse Events module. (NCT01075282)
Timeframe: Baseline through 26, 52, and 78 weeks

,,
Interventionevents per participant per year (Mean)
Severe HE, 26 weeksSevere HE, 52 weeksSevere HE, 78 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 26 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 52 weeksDocumented symptomatic HE, 78 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 26 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 52 weeksAsymptomatic HE, 78 weeksNocturnal HE, 26 weeksNocturnal HE, 52 weeksNocturnal HE, 78 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 26 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 52 weeksProbable symptomatic HE, 78 weeks
Insulin Glargine0.010.010.013.643.343.034.824.413.801.862.071.810.150.080.07
LY2189265 0.75 mg0.000.000.002.521.971.663.582.682.380.960.650.590.140.090.07
LY2189265 1.5 mg0.010.000.012.352.031.673.793.082.561.230.900.770.080.070.05

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionkg (Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.367
Glimepiride0.309

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionpercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.66
Glimepiride-0.77

Change From Baseline in HOMA-β at 52 W

β cell function is measured by the Homeostatic Model Assessment(HOMA-β). HOMA β = [20 x fasting insulin (μU/mL)] / [fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L) - 3.5] (NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Sitagliptin10.2
Glimepiride23.7

Change From Baseline in Insulin/Proinsulin Ratio at 52 W

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: Baseline and 52 W

Interventionratio (Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.049
Glimepiride-0.002

Number of Participants With Hypoglycaemia

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: From baseline to 52 W

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sitagliptin7
Glimepiride23

The Number of Participants Achieving HbA1c < 6.9 %

(NCT01183104)
Timeframe: 52 W

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Sitagliptin89
Glimepiride86

Change in Body Weight at Week 104

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.70
Lira 1.2-1.89
Glimepiride0.95

Change in Body Weight at Week 156

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.43
Lira 1.2-1.68
Glimepiride1.05

Change in Body Weight at Week 52

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.45
Lira 1.2-2.05
Glimepiride1.12

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 104

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-15.82
Lira 1.2-9.36
Glimepiride1.97

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 156

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-12.06
Lira 1.2-5.45
Glimepiride4.57

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 52

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-25.57
Lira 1.2-15.21
Glimepiride-5.29

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.88
Lira 1.2-0.59
Glimepiride-0.28

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 156

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.71
Lira 1.2-0.44
Glimepiride-0.16

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 52

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-1.14
Lira 1.2-0.84
Glimepiride-0.51

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.15
Lira 1.2-27.34
Glimepiride-24.85

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-34.83
Lira 1.2-25.68
Glimepiride-23.84

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.4
Lira 1.2-30.8
Glimepiride-24.5

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.76
Lira 1.2-8.28
Glimepiride-7.95

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.01
Lira 1.2-7.53
Glimepiride-7.97

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-9.6
Lira 1.2-8.4
Glimepiride-5.6

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride0533405
Lira 1.2068133
Lira 1.817187

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride1344
Lira 1.2031
Lira 1.80133

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 30

Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.8
Glimepiride1.2

Change From Baseline in FPG (Fasting Plasma Glucose) at Week 30

Change from baseline at Week 30 was defined as Week 30 minus Week 0. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-14.6
Glimepiride-17.5

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 30

Patient-level HbA1c is measured as a percent. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 30 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.47
Glimepiride-0.54

Percent of Patients With A1C <6.5% at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin21.2
Glimepiride27.5

Percent of Patients With A1C <7.0% at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin52.4
Glimepiride59.6

Percent of Patients With at Least One Hypoglycemia Episode of Any Type at Week 30

(NCT00701090)
Timeframe: Week 0 to Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin7.0
Glimepiride22.0

Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

This change from baseline reflects the Week 18 FPG minus the Week 0 FPG. Means are adjusted for baseline FPG, baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance (Interim Analysis). (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Placebo7.2
Linagliptin-13.3

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Final Analysis)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. The primary analysis was re-run at the completion of the study in the final study report. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Placebo0.21
Linagliptin-0.39

HbA1c Change From Baseline at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the Week 18 HbA1c percent minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. Means are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 18

Interventionpercent (Mean)
Placebo0.14
Linagliptin-0.44

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c Lowering by 0.5% at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo17.8
Linagliptin36.1

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<6.5 at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo2.9
Linagliptin8.9

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c<7.0 at Week 18 (Interim Analysis)

Odds ratios are adjusted for baseline HbA1c, prior OADs and reason for metformin intolerance. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Week 18

Interventionpercent of patients (Number)
Placebo11.8
Linagliptin23.5

The Change in FPG From Baseline by Visit Over Time

This change from baseline reflects the FPG (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12,18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=63, 134)Change from baseline at week 12 (N=55,92)Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 115)Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 110)Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 108)Change from baseline at week 30 (N=48, 95)Change from baseline at week 34 (N=48, 95)Change from baseline at week 40 (N=47, 92)Change from baseline at week 46 (N=47, 92)Change from baseline at week 52 (N=43, 86)
Linagliptin-8.4-14.3-12.9-14.0-17.0-19.1-15.8-19.0-18.1-14.0
Placebo/Glimepiride9.75.45.0-19.3-22.6-31.4-25.6-19.5-22.8-19.1

The Change in HbA1c From Baseline by Visit Over Time

HbA1c is measured as a percentage. Thus, this change from baseline reflects the HbA1c percent (at weeks 6, 12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52) minus the Week 0 HbA1c percent. (NCT00740051)
Timeframe: Baseline and weeks 6,12, 18, 22, 26, 30, 34, 40, 46, 52

,
Interventionpercent (Mean)
Change from baseline at week 6 (N=64, 136)Change from baseline at week 12 (N=57, 129)Change from baseline at week 18 (N=47, 118)Change from baseline at week 22 (N=46, 113)Change from baseline at week 26 (N=50, 110)Change from baseline at week 30 (N=49, 98)Change from baseline at week 34 (N=50, 96)Change from baseline at week 40 (N=49, 94)Change from baseline at week 46 (N=45, 92)Change from baseline at week 52 (N=45, 92)
Linagliptin-0.21-0.43-0.38-0.40-0.48-0.49-0.49-0.45-0.42-0.44
Placebo/Glimepiride0.260.260.10-0.32-0.53-0.79-0.75-0.73-0.78-0.72

Correlation Between HbA1c Values at Baseline and Hypoglycemia Scores at Week 12

Coefficient of correlation as measured using linear regression analysis for association between two variables, HbA1c values at baseline and hypoglycemia scores. A positive correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value increases, or as as one value decreases the other value decreases. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

InterventionCorrelation coefficient (Number)
All Participants0.0026

Correlation Between HbA1c Values at Week 12 and Hypoglycemia Scores

Coefficient of correlation was measured using a linear regression analysis for the association between two variables, HbA1c values at Week 12 and hypoglycemia scores. A negative correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value decreases, and vice versa. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionCorrelation coefficient (Number)
All Participants-0.1215

Correlation Between HbA1c Values at Week 12 and Hypoglycemia Scores by Sub-group (Demographic/Disease Parameters)

Sub-group analyses based on Karl pearson coefficient of correlation for HbA1c values at Week 12 and hypoglycemia score. Participants were grouped based on gender, age, body mass index, and duration of diabetes. A negative correlation coefficient indicates that as one value increases the other value decreases, and vice versa. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionCorrelation coefficient (Number)
Male, n=526Female, n=417Age 18-34 years, n=45Age 35-44 years, n=171Age 45-64 years, n=595Age 65 years and older, n=138Body mass index <25 kg/m^2, n=370Body mass index 25-30 kg/m^2, n=394Body mass index >30 kg/m^2, n=183Duration of diabetes <5 years, n=640Duration of diabetes 5-10 years, n=239Duration of diabetes >10 years, n=49
All Participants-0.1654-0.0756-0.1636-0.1034-0.1222-0.0984-0.0100-0.2188-0.1688-0.1201-0.1503-0.1316

Hypoglycemia Symptom Score by Sub-group (Demographic/Disease Parameters)

Sub-group analyses of mean hypoglycemia symptom score. Participants were grouped based on gender, age, hypoglycemia severity, body mass index, duration of diabetes, and number of oral hypoglycemic agents. Hypoglycemia symptom score (measured by Stanford Hypoglycemia Questionnaire) is a score on a scale with a possible range of 0 (best) to 7 (worst). The questionnaire was administered by the physician at Week 12. (NCT00907881)
Timeframe: Week 12

InterventionScore on a scale (Mean)
Male, n=526Female, n=417Age 18-34 years, n=45Age 35-44 years, n=171Age 45-64 years, n=595Age 65 years and older, n=138Mild hypoglycemia, n=286Moderate hypoglycemia, n=168Severe hypoglycemia, n=15Body mass index <25 kg/m^2, n=370Body mass index 25-30 kg/m^2, n=394Body mass index >30 kg/m^2, n=183Duration of T2DM <5 years, n=640Duration of T2DM 5-10 years, n=239Duration of T2DM >10 years, n=49No background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=201 background oral hypoglycemic agent, n=8542 background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=693 background oral hypoglycemic agents, n=7
All Participants0.871.120.910.870.961.181.592.362.531.010.950.960.881.151.290.600.971.300.00

Change From Baseline in A1C at Week 24

Hemoglobin A1C (A1C) is measured as percent. Thus this change from baseline reflects the Week 24 A1C percent minus the Week 0 A1C percent. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.45
Placebo/ Pioglitazone0.28

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 24

The change from baseline is the Week 24 Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) minus the Week 0 FPG. (NCT00106704)
Timeframe: Baseline and 24 Weeks

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-4.4
Placebo/ Pioglitazone15.7

Reviews

12 reviews available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
Clinical Evidence and Practice-Based Guidelines on the Utility of Basal Insulin Combined Oral Therapy (Metformin and Glimepiride) in the Current Era.
    Current diabetes reviews, 2023, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyce

2023
Incretin-based drugs for type 2 diabetes: Focus on East Asian perspectives.
    Journal of diabetes investigation, 2016, Volume: 7 Suppl 1

    Topics: Animals; Asian People; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Glucagon-Like

2016
[Hypoglycemic risk of insulinotropic drugs].
    Medizinische Monatsschrift fur Pharmazeuten, 2009, Volume: 32, Issue:12

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Insulin; Risk; Sulfonylurea Com

2009
A case of hypoglycemic hemiparesis and literature review.
    Upsala journal of medical sciences, 2012, Volume: 117, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Metformin; Pa

2012
Glimepiride: evidence-based facts, trends, and observations (GIFTS). [corrected].
    Vascular health and risk management, 2012, Volume: 8

    Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Evidence-Based Medi

2012
Long-acting sulfonylureas -- long-acting hypoglycaemia.
    The Medical journal of Australia, 2004, Jan-19, Volume: 180, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Monitoring; Fatal Outcome; F

2004
Insulin secretagogues: who, what, when, and how?
    Current diabetes reports, 2005, Volume: 5, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypogly

2005
Sulphonylureas in the management of type 2 diabetes during the fasting month of Ramadan.
    Journal of the Indian Medical Association, 2005, Volume: 103, Issue:8

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Ketoacidosis; Fasting; Holidays; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglyce

2005
[Knack of treatment with oral hypoglycemic drugs in the elderly].
    Nihon rinsho. Japanese journal of clinical medicine, 2006, Volume: 64, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Biguanides; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglyce

2006
An overview of the safety and tolerance of glimepiride.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 1996, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic A

1996
Pharmacokinetic basis for the safety of glimepiride in risk groups of NIDDM patients.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 1996, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Kidney Di

1996
[Present status in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Insulin-secreting agents].
    La Revue de medecine interne, 1999, Volume: 20 Suppl 3

    Topics: Adenosine Triphosphate; Administration, Oral; Benzamides; Binding Sites; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

1999

Trials

62 trials available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
Effects of Initial Combinations of Gemigliptin Plus Metformin Compared with Glimepiride Plus Metformin on Gut Microbiota and Glucose Regulation in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: The INTESTINE Study.
    Nutrients, 2023, Jan-03, Volume: 15, Issue:1

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Gastrointestinal Microbiome; Gl

2023
Incident and recurrent hypoglycaemia with linagliptin and glimepiride over a median of 6 years in the CAROLINA cardiovascular outcome trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2023, Volume: 25, Issue:6

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; G

2023
Efficacy and safety of dual add-on therapy with dapagliflozin plus saxagliptin versus glimepiride in patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes on a stable dose of metformin: Results from a 52-week, randomized, active-controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Double

2020
The efficacy and safety of adding either vildagliptin or glimepiride to ongoing metformin therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Expert opinion on pharmacotherapy, 2017, Volume: 18, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dinoprost; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female;

2017
Long-term effects on glycaemic control and β-cell preservation of early intensive treatment in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: A multicentre randomized trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Resistance, Multiple; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Foll

2018
Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial.
    Journal of diabetes, 2018, Volume: 10, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV I

2018
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in East-Asian patients with type 2 diabetes in a multicentre, double-blind, randomized, parallel-arm, active comparator, phase III trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Asia, Eastern; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon

2018
Empagliflozin compared with glimepiride in metformin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes: 208-week data from a masked randomized controlled trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2018, Volume: 20, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug The

2018
Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female;

2019
Long-term efficacy and safety of ertugliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy: 104-week VERTIS MET trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Bone Density; Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2019
Linagliptin is more effective than glimepiride at achieving a composite outcome of target HbA₁c < 7% with no hypoglycaemia and no weight gain over 2 years.
    International journal of clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 67, Issue:4

    Topics: Analysis of Variance; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule;

2013
Vildagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of HbA₁c < 7.0% without hypoglycaemia and weight gain compared with glimepiride after 2 years of treatment.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2013, Volume: 100, Issue:3

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Metf

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Differential effects of vildagliptin and glimepiride on glucose fluctuations in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus assessed using continuous glucose monitoring.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitu

2013
Randomized, 1-year comparison of three ways to initiate and advance insulin for type 2 diabetes: twice-daily premixed insulin versus basal insulin with either basal-plus one prandial insulin or basal-bolus up to three prandial injections.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedu

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
Efficacy and safety of teneligliptin added to glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study with an open-label, long-term extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibit

2014
The effect of glargine versus glimepiride on pancreatic β-cell function in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin monotherapy: open-label, randomized, controlled study.
    Acta diabetologica, 2014, Volume: 51, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Chi-Square Distribution; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2014
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor sitagliptin compared with α-glucosidase inhibitor in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on sulfonylurea alone (SUCCESS-2): a multicenter, randomized, open-label, non-i
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2014, Volume: 16, Issue:8

    Topics: 1-Deoxynojirimycin; Aged; alpha-Glucosidases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inh

2014
Comparison between the therapeutic effect of metformin, glimepiride and their combination as an add-on treatment to insulin glargine in uncontrolled patients with type 2 diabetes.
    PloS one, 2014, Volume: 9, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response

2014
Vildagliptin added to sulfonylurea improves glycemic control without hypoglycemia and weight gain in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of diabetes, 2015, Volume: 7, Issue:2

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Case-Control Studies; China;

2015
Vildagliptin compared to glimepiride on post-prandial lipemia and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2014, Volume: 63, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method

2014
Glucose-lowering effects and low risk of hypoglycemia in patients with maturity-onset diabetes of the young when treated with a GLP-1 receptor agonist: a double-blind, randomized, crossover trial.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Cross-Over Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Fast

2014
Modulation of insulin dose titration using a hypoglycaemia-sensitive algorithm: insulin glargine versus neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in insulin-naïve people with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Asia; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Circadian Rhythm; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Dosage

2015
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2015
Regardless of the degree of glycaemic control, linagliptin has lower hypoglycaemia risk than all doses of glimepiride, at all time points, over the course of a 2-year trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind M

2015
Treatment with the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor linagliptin or placebo followed by glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes with moderate to severe renal impairment: a 52-week, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-

2015
Efficacy and tolerability of saxagliptin compared with glimepiride in elderly patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized, controlled study (GENERATION).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Adamantane; Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptid

2015
Counterregulatory responses to hypoglycemia differ between glimepiride and glyburide in non diabetic individuals.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2015, Volume: 64, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Female; Glucagon; Glucose Clamp Technique; Glyburide; Humans; Hypog

2015
Treatment escalation options for patients with type 2 diabetes after failure of exenatide twice daily or glimepiride added to metformin: results from the prospective European Exenatide (EUREXA) study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Two dose-ranging studies with PF-04937319, a systemic partial activator of glucokinase, as add-on therapy to metformin in adults with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Benzofurans; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Doubl

2015
Efficacy and Tolerability of Sitagliptin Compared with Glimepiride in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Drugs & aging, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:6

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet; D

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Efficacy and Safety of Once-Weekly Dulaglutide Versus Insulin Glargine in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin and Glimepiride (AWARD-2).
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gastrointestinal Diseas

2015
Effect of ranolazine on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with either glimepiride or metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Interactions; Dr

2016
A 24-week study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of once-weekly dulaglutide added on to glimepiride in type 2 diabetes (AWARD-8).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2016, Volume: 18, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance;

2016
Hypoglycemia in Frail Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Treated With Sulfonylurea.
    Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2017, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Frail Eld

2017
Effects of Glimepiride versus Saxagliptin on β-Cell Function and Hypoglycemia: A Post Hoc Analysis in Older Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Inadequately Controlled with Metformin.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2016, Volume: 38, Issue:12

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-

2016
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin as compared with glimepiride in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus aged ≥ 60 years (START-J trial).
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2017, Volume: 19, Issue:8

    Topics: Activities of Daily Living; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aging; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Diabetes

2017
Patient-reported outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with liraglutide or glimepiride, both as add-on to metformin.
    Primary care diabetes, 2010, Volume: 4, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Humans;

2010
Patient-reported outcomes following treatment with the human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide or glimepiride in monotherapy: results from a randomized controlled trial in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:7

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Peptide 1; Glycated Hemoglobin

2010
Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2010
Efficacy and safety of treatment with sitagliptin or glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy: a randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Co

2011
Linagliptin monotherapy in type 2 diabetes patients for whom metformin is inappropriate: an 18-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III trial with a 34-week active-controlled extension.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2012, Volume: 14, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pep

2012
Usage pattern, glycemic improvement, hypoglycemia, and body mass index changes with sulfonylureas in real-life clinical practice: results from OBSTACLE Hypoglycemia Study.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2013, Volume: 15, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2013
Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2013, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyca

2013
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2003, Jun-17, Volume: 138, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog

2003
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2003, Jun-17, Volume: 138, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog

2003
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2003, Jun-17, Volume: 138, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog

2003
Glimepiride combined with morning insulin glargine, bedtime neutral protamine hagedorn insulin, or bedtime insulin glargine in patients with type 2 diabetes. A randomized, controlled trial.
    Annals of internal medicine, 2003, Jun-17, Volume: 138, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Glycated Hemog

2003
Hormonal counterregulation and consecutive glimepiride serum concentrations during severe hypoglycaemia associated with glimepiride therapy.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 59, Issue:10

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glucose; Hormones; Humans

2003
GUIDE study: double-blind comparison of once-daily gliclazide MR and glimepiride in type 2 diabetic patients.
    European journal of clinical investigation, 2004, Volume: 34, Issue:8

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Gliclazide; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hyp

2004
Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes care, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hy

2005
Good glycemic control with flexibility in timing of basal insulin supply: a 24-week comparison of insulin glargine given once daily in the morning or at bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride.
    Diabetes care, 2005, Volume: 28, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Incidence; Insu

2005
Electronic pill-boxes in the evaluation of oral hypoglycemic agent compliance.
    Diabetes & metabolism, 2005, Volume: 31, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Administration Schedule

2005
Effects of glimepiride and glyburide on glucose counterregulation and recovery from hypoglycemia.
    Metabolism: clinical and experimental, 2006, Volume: 55, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Epinephrine; Female; Glucose; Glyburide; Hormones; Human Growth Hor

2006
Differential effect of glimepiride and rosiglitazone on metabolic control of type 2 diabetic patients treated with metformin: a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:2

    Topics: Body Mass Index; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Female; Glycated

2006
Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2006, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2006
Therapy in type 2 diabetes: insulin glargine vs. NPH insulin both in combination with glimepiride.
    Archives of medical research, 2006, Volume: 37, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; I

2006
Insulin glargine versus NPH insulin therapy in Asian Type 2 diabetes patients.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2007, Volume: 76, Issue:1

    Topics: Asian People; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glycated

2007
Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2006, Volume: 114, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relati

2006
Combination of oral antidiabetic agents with basal insulin versus premixed insulin alone in randomized elderly patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2007, Volume: 55, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fem

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Efficacy and safety of the dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on glimepiride alone or on glimepiride and metformin.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2007, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Drug Therapy

2007
Initial treatment with fixed-dose combination rosiglitazone/glimepiride in patients with previously untreated type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:8

    Topics: Adiponectin; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glycat

2008
Efficacy and treatment satisfaction of once-daily insulin glargine plus one or two oral antidiabetic agents versus continuing premixed human insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes previously on long-term conventional insulin therapy: the Switch pilot st
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2007, Volume: 115, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Case-Control Studies; Diabetes Mellitus,

2007
Clinical evaluation of glimepiride versus glyburide in NIDDM in a double-blind comparative study. Glimepiride/Glyburide Research Group.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 1996, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glyburide; G

1996
The effects of acute exercise on metabolic control in type II diabetic patients treated with glimepiride or glibenclamide.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 1996, Volume: 28, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Exercise; Fem

1996
Beginning insulin treatment of obese patients with evening 70/30 insulin plus glimepiride versus insulin alone. Glimepiride Combination Group.
    Diabetes care, 1998, Volume: 21, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetes Mell

1998

Other Studies

32 other studies available for glimepiride and Hypoglycemia

ArticleYear
Self-assembled di- and tripeptide gels for the passive entrapment and pH-responsive, sustained release of an antidiabetic drug, glimepiride.
    Biomaterials science, 2022, May-04, Volume: 10, Issue:9

    Topics: Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Gels; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Hy

2022
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur

2023
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur

2023
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur

2023
Comparative safety of sulfonylureas among U.S. nursing home residents.
    Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2023, Volume: 71, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Female; Glipizide; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Male; Medicare; Myocardial Infarction; Nur

2023
Comparative cardiovascular and hypoglycaemic safety of glimepiride in type 2 diabetes: A population-based cohort study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2020, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female

2020
Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors Used Concomitantly with Insulin Secretagogues and the Risk of Serious Hypoglycemia.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2022, Volume: 111, Issue:1

    Topics: Administrative Claims, Healthcare; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors

2022
Comparative Safety of Sulfonylureas and the Risk of Sudden Cardiac Arrest and Ventricular Arrhythmia.
    Diabetes care, 2018, Volume: 41, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Cause of Death; Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Diabetic Angiopathies; Female; G

2018
Hypoglycaemia due to interaction of glimepiride with isoniazid in a patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    BMJ case reports, 2013, Apr-16, Volume: 2013

    Topics: Aged; Antitubercular Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Hypoglyce

2013
[A case of hypoglycemia caused by the accidental ingestion of glimepiride in an elderly dementia patient diagnosed based on the serum glimepiride concentration].
    Nihon Ronen Igakkai zasshi. Japanese journal of geriatrics, 2013, Volume: 50, Issue:4

    Topics: Aged; Dementia; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Medication Errors; Sulfonylurea Com

2013
How to prevent and treat pharmacological hypoglycemias.
    Revista clinica espanola, 2014, Volume: 214, Issue:4

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Antihypertensive Agents; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hyperc

2014
Cost-effectiveness of saxagliptin vs glimepiride as a second-line therapy added to metformin in Type 2 diabetes in China.
    Journal of medical economics, 2015, Volume: 18, Issue:10

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Cardiovascular Diseases; China; Computer Simulation; Cost-Benefit Analy

2015
Treatment satisfaction in type 2 diabetes patients taking empagliflozin compared with patients taking glimepiride.
    Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; Benzhydryl Compounds; Clinical Protocols; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dru

2016
Severe hypoglycemia in users of sulfonylurea antidiabetic agents and antihyperlipidemics.
    Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2016, Volume: 99, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Algorithms; Cohort Studies; Drug Interactions; Female; Fenofibrate; Glipizide; Glyburide; Huma

2016
New-Onset Hypoglycemia in a Medically Complex 6-Year-Old Girl. Glimepiride poisoning.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2015, Volume: 31, Issue:12

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Child; Female; Glucose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Sulfonylurea Compo

2015
Association between use of warfarin with common sulfonylureas and serious hypoglycemic events: retrospective cohort analysis.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2015, Dec-07, Volume: 351

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anticoagulants; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Emergency Service,

2015
A post-hoc analysis of the comparative efficacy of canagliflozin and glimepiride in the attainment of type 2 diabetes-related quality measures.
    BMC health services research, 2016, 08-05, Volume: 16, Issue:a

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure Determination; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-

2016
Biomedical Informatics Approaches to Identifying Drug-Drug Interactions: Application to Insulin Secretagogues.
    Epidemiology (Cambridge, Mass.), 2017, Volume: 28, Issue:3

    Topics: Area Under Curve; Carbamates; Cyclohexanes; Databases, Factual; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Inte

2017
SUR receptor activity vs. incidence of hypoglycaemia and cardiovascular mortality with sulphonylurea therapy for diabetics.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:11

    Topics: ATP-Binding Cassette Transporters; Diabetes Mellitus; Glyburide; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Potassium Cha

2008
Basal insulin glargine vs prandial insulin lispro in type 2 diabetes.
    Lancet (London, England), 2008, Aug-02, Volume: 372, Issue:9636

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Synergism; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypoglycemia;

2008
Efficacy and safety of insulin glargine and glimepiride in subjects with Type 2 diabetes before, during and after the period of fasting in Ramadan.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:12

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Fasting; Female; Glycated Hemoglobin; Humans; Hypog

2009
Factitious hypoglycaemia.
    Internal medicine journal, 2009, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Factitious Disorders; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; M

2009
Severe sulfonylurea-induced hypoglycemia: a problem of uncritical prescription and deficiencies of diabetes care in geriatric patients.
    Expert opinion on drug safety, 2010, Volume: 9, Issue:5

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Comorbidity; Diabetes Mellitus,

2010
[Detection of glimepiride and rosiglitazone from Chinese dietary supplements].
    Chudoku kenkyu : Chudoku Kenkyukai jun kikanshi = The Japanese journal of toxicology, 2011, Volume: 24, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; China; Chromatography, Liquid; Dietary Supplements; Drug Overdose; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypog

2011
Hypoglycemia after accidental pediatric sulfonylurea ingestions.
    Pediatric emergency care, 2011, Volume: 27, Issue:9

    Topics: Accidents, Home; Arizona; Blood Glucose; Child, Preschool; Emergency Service, Hospital; Glipizide; G

2011
Association of KCNJ11 E23K gene polymorphism with hypoglycemia in sulfonylurea-treated type 2 diabetic patients.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 98, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alleles; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Diabetes Mellitus, Typ

2012
Characteristics and time course of severe glimepiride- versus glibenclamide-induced hypoglycaemia.
    European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2003, Volume: 59, Issue:2

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyburide; Humans;

2003
Inadvertent sulfonylurea overdosage and hypoglycemia in an elderly woman: failure of serum hypoglycemia screening.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2003, Volume: 5, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; C-Peptide; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Overdose; Female;

2003
A diabetic woman with worsening heart failure, hunger, and tremor.
    Cleveland Clinic journal of medicine, 2003, Volume: 70, Issue:10

    Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Angiopathies; Gastrointestinal Agents; Heart Failure; Humans; Hy

2003
The diagnostic value of determining the hydroxy metabolite of glimepiride (M1) in blood serum in cases of severe hypoglycaemia associated with glimepiride therapy.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2004, Volume: 6, Issue:5

    Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Humans; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agent

2004
Association between CYP2C9 slow metabolizer genotypes and severe hypoglycaemia on medication with sulphonylurea hypoglycaemic agents.
    British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005, Volume: 60, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Aryl Hydrocarbon Hydroxylases; Case-Control Studies; Cytochrome P-450 CYP2C9; Diabetes Mellitu

2005
[Hardly any hypoglycemias, constant weight--and still cost effective].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2005, Nov-24, Volume: 147, Issue:47

    Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drugs, Generic; Glyburide; Humans; Hy

2005
Gatifloxacin induced abnormalities in glucose homeostasis in a patient on glimepiride.
    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2006, Volume: 54

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Blood Glucose; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gatifloxacin; Hom

2006
Hypoglycaemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with a combination of metformin and sulphonylurea therapy in France.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10 Suppl 1

    Topics: Cross-Sectional Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; France; Glipi

2008
[Persistent hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia in newborn associated with glimepiride treatment at the beginning of pregnancy].
    Revista clinica espanola, 2000, Volume: 200, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Diabetes, Gestational; Female; Humans; Hyperinsulinism; Hypoglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; In

2000