glimepiride has been researched along with Body Weight in 43 studies
glimepiride: structure given in first source
Body Weight: The mass or quantity of heaviness of an individual. It is expressed by units of pounds or kilograms.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes." | 9.30 | Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019) |
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exenatide compared to glimepiride on body weight, glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients taking metformin." | 9.15 | Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bonaventura, A; Bossi, AC; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Franzetti, IG; Guazzini, B; Maffioli, P; Putignano, P; Querci, F; Testori, G, 2011) |
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain." | 9.14 | Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010) |
"Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control." | 9.10 | Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. ( Beuth, J; Kolb, H; Martin, S; Scherbaum, WA; Schneider, B; van Leendert, R, 2003) |
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks." | 7.83 | Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016) |
"The aim of this work was to determine whether glimepiride, a derivate of sulphonylurea of the hypoglycemic effect, influences the level of prooxidative factors and antioxidative enzymes activity in the course of experimental streptozotocin hyperglycemia in rats." | 7.72 | The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia. ( Grzymisławski, M; Koźlik, J; Krauss, H; Mikrut, K; Paluszak, J; Piatek, J; Sosnowski, P, 2003) |
"Mean body weight was reduced from 79." | 6.71 | Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study. ( Klingler, A; Lechleitner, M; Luger, A; Weitgasser, R, 2003) |
"Men with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are often characterised by low testosterone (T)." | 5.48 | Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity. ( Hao, M; Kuang, HY; Li, BW; Ma, XF; Pan, J; Shao, N; Wu, WH; Yu, XY; Yu, YM; Zhang, HJ, 2018) |
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes." | 5.30 | Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019) |
"Compared with glimepiride, Sita/Met as an initial treatment led to significantly greater improvements in glycemic control and body weight changes, with a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, over 30 weeks." | 5.24 | Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicenter randomized double-blind study. ( Chung, SC; Kim, IJ; Kim, SS; Kim, YI; Lee, KJ; Lee, SJ; Lee, YS; Park, JH, 2017) |
"Changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP) with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo or active comparator (i." | 5.22 | Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. ( Alba, M; Cerdas, S; Chacon, Mdel P; Eliaschewitz, FG; Lavalle-González, FJ; Tong, C, 2016) |
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exenatide compared to glimepiride on body weight, glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients taking metformin." | 5.15 | Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bonaventura, A; Bossi, AC; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Franzetti, IG; Guazzini, B; Maffioli, P; Putignano, P; Querci, F; Testori, G, 2011) |
"Liraglutide monotherapy for 2 years provides significant and sustained improvements in glycaemic control and body weight compared with glimepiride monotherapy, at a lower risk of hypoglycaemia." | 5.15 | Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, provides sustained improvements in glycaemic control and weight for 2 years as monotherapy compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Bode, B; Chang, CT; Garber, A; Hale, P; Henry, RR; Ratner, R, 2011) |
"The aim of the study was to compare the effects of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride on metabolic and insulin resistance related-indices in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM)." | 5.14 | Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. ( Ciccarelli, L; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Maffioli, P; Mereu, R; Piccinni, MN; Querci, F; Ragonesi, PD; Salvadeo, SA, 2010) |
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain." | 5.14 | Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010) |
"To compare the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia and glycemic control following bedtime or morning insulin glargine (LANTUS; glargine) plus glimepiride." | 5.12 | Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility. ( Maxeiner, S; Raptis, S; Standl, E, 2006) |
"Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control." | 5.10 | Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. ( Beuth, J; Kolb, H; Martin, S; Scherbaum, WA; Schneider, B; van Leendert, R, 2003) |
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks." | 3.83 | Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016) |
"The aim of this work was to determine whether glimepiride, a derivate of sulphonylurea of the hypoglycemic effect, influences the level of prooxidative factors and antioxidative enzymes activity in the course of experimental streptozotocin hyperglycemia in rats." | 3.72 | The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia. ( Grzymisławski, M; Koźlik, J; Krauss, H; Mikrut, K; Paluszak, J; Piatek, J; Sosnowski, P, 2003) |
"Patients with type 2 diabetes who have cardiovascular disease and are receiving empagliflozin have a lower rate of primary composite cardiovascular outcomes." | 3.11 | Comparison of the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study. ( Hasebe, M; Ito, K; Kondo, Y; Satoh, S; Tamura, H; Terauchi, Y, 2022) |
" The most frequent gastrointestinal drug-related adverse events with dulaglutide were diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting." | 2.94 | Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. ( Chen, LL; Du, LY; Li, QM; Li, YB; Liu, XM; Ma, JH; Shi, LX; Shi, YQ; Wang, F, 2020) |
"These 3-year efficacy data support long-term use of albiglutide in the management of people with T2DM." | 2.84 | Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. ( Ahrén, B; Ambery, P; Carr, MC; Cirkel, DT; Home, PD; Miller, D; Nauck, MA; Rendell, M; Reusch, JEB; Weissman, PN, 2017) |
"Patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin were randomized to albiglutide (30 mg), sitagliptin (100 mg), glimepiride (2 mg), or placebo." | 2.79 | HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin. ( Ahrén, B; Cirkel, DT; Feinglos, MN; Johnson, SL; Perry, C; Stewart, M; Yang, F, 2014) |
"Insulin resistance was improved significantly with HOMA-IR decreasing from 2." | 2.78 | Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Duan, WR; Gao, Y; Guo, XH; Han, P; Lv, XF; Yang, HZ; Zhang, XZ, 2013) |
" The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and adjudicated cardiovascular events was 74." | 2.74 | Fifty-two-week efficacy and safety of vildagliptin vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ( Ahrén, B; Byiers, S; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Fonseca, V; Matthews, D; Shao, Q; Zinman, B, 2009) |
"placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) 7." | 2.73 | Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a sulphonylurea. ( Banerji, MA; Baron, MA; Camisasca, RP; Couturier, A; Ebeling, P; Foley, JE; Garber, AJ; Gudbjörnsdottir, S, 2008) |
"Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim." | 2.72 | Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. ( Kann, PH; Medding, J; Moeller, J; Mokan, M; Mrevlje, F; Regulski, M; Szocs, A; Wascher, T; Zackova, V, 2006) |
"Mean body weight was reduced from 79." | 2.71 | Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study. ( Klingler, A; Lechleitner, M; Luger, A; Weitgasser, R, 2003) |
"Two groups of 12 Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients participated in a double-blind randomized cross-over study consisting of two 8-week periods, in which treatment with orally administered glibenclamide (15 mg/day) was compared with either glimepiride or metformin (6 mg and 1500 mg/day, respectively)." | 2.70 | Vascular effects of glibenclamide vs. glimepiride and metformin in Type 2 diabetic patients. ( Abbink, EJ; Jansen van Rosendaal, A; Lutterman, JA; Pickkers, P; Russel, FG; Smits, P; Tack, CJ, 2002) |
"Patients aged 35-70 years with poorly controlled diabetes [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > or =1,40 g/l and < 3 g/l at baseline] were treated with glimepiride for 6 months, with dosage titrated from 1-6 mg daily, depending on the monthly FPG measurement." | 2.70 | Predictors of response to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Altman, JJ; Charpentier, G; Derobert, E; Etienne, S; Fleury, F; Grimaldi, A; Halimi, S; Oriol, V; Vaur, L, 2001) |
"The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and, in particular, blood glucose levels can be complex and challenging for physicians and patients." | 2.47 | Optimizing outcomes for GLP-1 agonists. ( Freeman, JS, 2011) |
"Glimepiride is a once-daily SU that was introduced in 1995." | 2.42 | Glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the worldwide therapeutic experience. ( Massi-Benedetti, M, 2003) |
"Men with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are often characterised by low testosterone (T)." | 1.48 | Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity. ( Hao, M; Kuang, HY; Li, BW; Ma, XF; Pan, J; Shao, N; Wu, WH; Yu, XY; Yu, YM; Zhang, HJ, 2018) |
"Treatment with liraglutide resulted in mean decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of -1." | 1.42 | Add-On Treatment with Liraglutide Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Therapy. ( Brunetti, A; Capula, C; Chiefari, E; Foti, D; Greco, M; Liguori, R; Oliverio, R; Puccio, L; Pullano, V; Tirinato, D; Vero, A; Vero, R, 2015) |
" In normal and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats the combination of glimepiride with piperine increased all the pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUC0-n, AUCtotal, t1/2, and MRT, and decreased the clearance, Vd, markedly as compared with the control group." | 1.38 | Effect of piperine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. ( Rani, TS; Sujatha, S; Veeresham, C, 2012) |
"Glimepiride is an oral sulfonylurea drug; nicotinamide is an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase and a precursor of NAD." | 1.29 | The effects of nicotinamide and glimepiride on diabetes prevention in BB rats. ( Chan, EK; Charles, MA; Cheta, D; Pan, J; Schranz, V, 1995) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 1 (2.33) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 18 (41.86) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 22 (51.16) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (4.65) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Tamura, H | 1 |
Kondo, Y | 1 |
Ito, K | 1 |
Hasebe, M | 1 |
Satoh, S | 1 |
Terauchi, Y | 1 |
Home, PD | 1 |
Ahrén, B | 4 |
Reusch, JEB | 1 |
Rendell, M | 1 |
Weissman, PN | 1 |
Cirkel, DT | 2 |
Miller, D | 1 |
Ambery, P | 1 |
Carr, MC | 1 |
Nauck, MA | 2 |
Shao, N | 1 |
Yu, XY | 1 |
Yu, YM | 1 |
Li, BW | 1 |
Pan, J | 2 |
Wu, WH | 1 |
Zhang, HJ | 1 |
Ma, XF | 1 |
Hao, M | 1 |
Kuang, HY | 1 |
Gu, T | 1 |
Ma, J | 1 |
Zhang, Q | 1 |
Zhu, L | 1 |
Zhang, H | 1 |
Xu, L | 1 |
Cheng, J | 1 |
Shi, B | 1 |
Li, D | 1 |
Shao, J | 1 |
Sun, Z | 1 |
Zhong, S | 1 |
Bi, Y | 1 |
Zhu, D | 1 |
Shi, LX | 1 |
Liu, XM | 1 |
Shi, YQ | 1 |
Li, QM | 1 |
Ma, JH | 1 |
Li, YB | 1 |
Du, LY | 1 |
Wang, F | 1 |
Chen, LL | 1 |
Strojek, K | 1 |
Yoon, KH | 2 |
Hruba, V | 1 |
Elze, M | 1 |
Langkilde, AM | 1 |
Parikh, S | 1 |
Johnson, SL | 1 |
Stewart, M | 1 |
Yang, F | 1 |
Perry, C | 1 |
Feinglos, MN | 1 |
Leiter, LA | 1 |
Arias, P | 1 |
Langslet, G | 1 |
Xie, J | 2 |
Balis, DA | 1 |
Millington, D | 1 |
Vercruysse, F | 1 |
Canovatchel, W | 2 |
Meininger, G | 2 |
Chiefari, E | 1 |
Capula, C | 1 |
Vero, A | 1 |
Oliverio, R | 1 |
Puccio, L | 1 |
Liguori, R | 1 |
Pullano, V | 1 |
Greco, M | 1 |
Foti, D | 1 |
Tirinato, D | 1 |
Vero, R | 1 |
Brunetti, A | 1 |
Hartley, P | 1 |
Shentu, Y | 1 |
Betz-Schiff, P | 1 |
Golm, GT | 1 |
Sisk, CM | 1 |
Engel, SS | 1 |
Shankar, RR | 1 |
Lavalle-González, FJ | 1 |
Eliaschewitz, FG | 1 |
Cerdas, S | 1 |
Chacon, Mdel P | 1 |
Tong, C | 1 |
Alba, M | 1 |
Blonde, L | 1 |
Stenlöf, K | 1 |
Fung, A | 1 |
Kim, SS | 1 |
Kim, IJ | 1 |
Lee, KJ | 1 |
Park, JH | 1 |
Kim, YI | 1 |
Lee, YS | 1 |
Chung, SC | 1 |
Lee, SJ | 1 |
Ye, Y | 1 |
Lin, Y | 1 |
Perez-Polo, JR | 1 |
Birnbaum, Y | 1 |
Ferrannini, E | 2 |
Fonseca, V | 2 |
Zinman, B | 2 |
Matthews, D | 1 |
Byiers, S | 1 |
Shao, Q | 1 |
Dejager, S | 2 |
Hsu, YJ | 1 |
Lee, TH | 1 |
Chang, CL | 1 |
Huang, YT | 1 |
Yang, WC | 1 |
Nakano, T | 1 |
Inoue, I | 1 |
Satoh, K | 1 |
Yamazaki, M | 1 |
Awata, T | 1 |
Kurihara, S | 1 |
Goto, S | 1 |
Shinoda, Y | 1 |
Komoda, T | 1 |
Katayama, S | 1 |
Jendle, J | 1 |
Matthews, DR | 2 |
Frid, A | 1 |
Hermansen, K | 1 |
Düring, M | 1 |
Zdravkovic, M | 2 |
Strauss, BJ | 1 |
Garber, AJ | 2 |
Derosa, G | 2 |
Maffioli, P | 2 |
Ferrari, I | 1 |
Mereu, R | 1 |
Ragonesi, PD | 1 |
Querci, F | 2 |
Franzetti, IG | 2 |
Gadaleta, G | 1 |
Ciccarelli, L | 1 |
Piccinni, MN | 1 |
D'Angelo, A | 1 |
Salvadeo, SA | 1 |
Couturier, A | 2 |
Foley, JE | 2 |
Gallwitz, B | 1 |
Haupt, A | 1 |
Kraus, P | 1 |
Peters, N | 1 |
Petto, H | 2 |
Dotta, F | 1 |
Poll, L | 1 |
Rose, L | 1 |
Schernthaner, G | 1 |
Garber, A | 1 |
Henry, RR | 1 |
Ratner, R | 1 |
Hale, P | 1 |
Chang, CT | 1 |
Bode, B | 1 |
Freeman, JS | 1 |
Putignano, P | 1 |
Bossi, AC | 1 |
Bonaventura, A | 1 |
Guazzini, B | 1 |
Testori, G | 1 |
Fogari, E | 1 |
Yoo, DY | 1 |
Kim, W | 1 |
Nam, SM | 1 |
Yoo, KY | 1 |
Lee, CH | 1 |
Choi, JH | 1 |
Won, MH | 1 |
Hwang, IK | 1 |
Yoon, YS | 1 |
Horowitz, M | 1 |
Flint, A | 1 |
Jones, KL | 1 |
Hindsberger, C | 1 |
Rasmussen, MF | 1 |
Kapitza, C | 1 |
Doran, S | 1 |
Jax, T | 1 |
Chapman, IM | 1 |
Srivastava, S | 1 |
Saxena, GN | 1 |
Keshwani, P | 1 |
Gupta, R | 1 |
Veeresham, C | 1 |
Sujatha, S | 1 |
Rani, TS | 1 |
Guo, XH | 1 |
Lv, XF | 1 |
Han, P | 1 |
Zhang, XZ | 1 |
Yang, HZ | 1 |
Duan, WR | 1 |
Gao, Y | 1 |
Weitgasser, R | 1 |
Lechleitner, M | 1 |
Luger, A | 1 |
Klingler, A | 1 |
Massi-Benedetti, M | 1 |
Krauss, H | 1 |
Koźlik, J | 1 |
Grzymisławski, M | 1 |
Sosnowski, P | 1 |
Mikrut, K | 1 |
Piatek, J | 1 |
Paluszak, J | 1 |
Martin, S | 2 |
Kolb, H | 1 |
Beuth, J | 1 |
van Leendert, R | 1 |
Schneider, B | 1 |
Scherbaum, WA | 1 |
McCluskey, D | 2 |
Touger, MS | 1 |
Melis, R | 1 |
Schleusener, DS | 1 |
Kabadi, UM | 1 |
Kabadi, M | 1 |
Standl, E | 1 |
Maxeiner, S | 1 |
Raptis, S | 1 |
Kann, PH | 1 |
Wascher, T | 1 |
Zackova, V | 1 |
Moeller, J | 1 |
Medding, J | 1 |
Szocs, A | 1 |
Mokan, M | 1 |
Mrevlje, F | 1 |
Regulski, M | 1 |
Banerji, MA | 1 |
Ebeling, P | 1 |
Gudbjörnsdottir, S | 1 |
Camisasca, RP | 1 |
Baron, MA | 1 |
Chan, EK | 1 |
Cheta, D | 1 |
Schranz, V | 1 |
Charles, MA | 1 |
Charpentier, G | 1 |
Vaur, L | 1 |
Halimi, S | 1 |
Fleury, F | 1 |
Derobert, E | 1 |
Grimaldi, A | 1 |
Oriol, V | 1 |
Etienne, S | 1 |
Altman, JJ | 1 |
Abbink, EJ | 1 |
Pickkers, P | 1 |
Jansen van Rosendaal, A | 1 |
Lutterman, JA | 1 |
Tack, CJ | 1 |
Russel, FG | 1 |
Smits, P | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide When Used in Combination With Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00849056] | Phase 3 | 310 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Long-term Safety of Albiglutide Compared With Insulin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.[NCT00838916] | Phase 3 | 779 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00849017] | Phase 3 | 309 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-01-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide Administered in Combination With Metformin and Glimepiride Compared With Metformin Plus Glimepiride and Placeb[NCT00839527] | Phase 3 | 685 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-02-28 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide When Used in Combination With Metformin Compared With Metformin Plus Sitagliptin, Metformin Plus Glimepiride, [NCT00838903] | Phase 3 | 1,049 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-02-28 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin and Glimepiride in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Controlled Inadequately With Metformin Monotherapy (SPECIFY Study) : a 48-week, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Trial[NCT02280486] | Phase 4 | 388 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2015-01-31 | Completed | ||
A 24-Week,Int.,Rand.,Double-blind,Parallel-group,Multi-centre, Plac.-Controlled Phase III Study With a 24-Wk Ext.Per.to Eval.the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Comb.With Glimepiride (a Sulphonylurea) in Subjects With Type2 Diab.Who Have Inadeq. G[NCT00680745] | Phase 3 | 597 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-04-30 | Completed | ||
Exercise Snacks and Glutamine to Improve Glucose Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes[NCT03199638] | 14 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-04-01 | Completed | |||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812] | Phase 3 | 1,452 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-09-30 | Completed | ||
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Sitagliptin Compared With Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control[NCT01189890] | Phase 3 | 480 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-08-16 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformi[NCT01137812] | Phase 3 | 756 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-07-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, 4-Arm, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Con[NCT01106677] | Phase 3 | 1,284 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Di[NCT01081834] | Phase 3 | 678 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-03-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Met[NCT01106625] | Phase 3 | 469 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-05-31 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Contr[NCT01106651] | Phase 3 | 716 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination (Janumet®) Compared to Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00993187] | Phase 4 | 292 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-05-04 | Completed | ||
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723] | Phase 3 | 746 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-02-28 | Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power) | ||
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-2): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy Versus Metformin and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Subjects With[NCT00318461] | Phase 3 | 1,091 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-05-31 | Completed | ||
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Victoza Efficacy in the Regression of Cardiovascular Dysfunction In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01761318] | Phase 4 | 50 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2013-11-30 | Completed | ||
The Effect of Adding Vildagliptin Versus Glimepiride to Metformin on Markers of Inflammation, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Diseases[NCT03693560] | Phase 4 | 80 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-10-08 | Completed | ||
Effects of Vildagliptin/Metformin Combination on Markers of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation in Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease[NCT01604213] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2012-09-30 | Completed | ||
Brown Adipose Tissue Activity in Response to Semaglutide Administered to Obese Subjects.[NCT05419726] | 20 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2023-02-01 | Recruiting | |||
A 4 Week Single Center, Double-dummy, Randomised Double-blind, Balanced Incomplete Latin Square Design Study to Evaluate the Effects of Liraglutide on Appetite in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Compared to Glimepiride and Placebo[NCT01511692] | Phase 1 | 43 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2005-11-30 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride as Oral Anti-Diabetic (OAD) Initiation Mono- Therapy in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)[NCT00908921] | Phase 4 | 391 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2009-04-30 | Completed | ||
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Plus Metformin With Insulin Glargine Plus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00619697] | Phase 4 | 260 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2003-12-31 | Completed | ||
Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin in Combination With Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00099944] | Phase 3 | 515 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-05-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. One Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participant (par.) had all post-BL HbA1c measurements occur after hyperglycemic rescue. This par. is included in the ITT Population counts but did not contribute to this analysis. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -0.05 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -0.81 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 1.50 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -0.16 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 0.45 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 0.28 |
The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 0.03 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -1.26 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 0.35 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -1.28 |
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 52.86 |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | NA |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 104, n= 29, 72 | Week 156, n=26, 54 | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -0.92 | -0.87 |
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | -0.72 | -0.50 |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <6.5%, and <7.0% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Week 156
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 20 | 32 | 44 |
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 7 | 12 | 17 |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <6.5%, and <7.0% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 37 | 66 | 96 |
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin | 8 | 22 | 44 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. Difference of least squares means (albiglutide - insulin glargine) is from the ANCOVA model. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-Baseline HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -0.67 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -0.79 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -3.47 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 0.90 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -1.05 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 1.56 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -0.83 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -2.19 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -0.87 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -2.06 |
A 24-hour glucose profile was collected at Baseline and Week 52 at a subset of sites in a subset of participants per treatment group using the continuous glucose monitoring device. Glucose measurements were obtained at 5 minute increments in the 24-hour period. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using the trapezoidal method on the measurements obtained during the first 24 hours of continuous monitoring. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Millimoles per hour per liter (mmol.h/L) (Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 0.457 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -1.657 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -0.83 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | -1.00 |
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 107.57 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | NA |
Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post-dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants receiving albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic response. As such, albiglutide plasma concentrations achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of participants receiving either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 and 24
Intervention | nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 8, Pre-dose, n=408 | Week 8, Post-dose, n=398 | Week 24, Pre-dose, n=416 | Week 24, Post-dose, n=401 | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 1642.83 | 1911.35 | 2159.30 | 2748.15 |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Week 156
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 33 | 59 | 85 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 18 | 46 | 71 |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 54 | 156 | 268 |
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea | 25 | 78 | 135 |
Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus ≥65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.15 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -0.70 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -0.89 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.91 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -1.32 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -2.24 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.66 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -0.39 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -0.86 |
The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.23 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -1.31 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -1.83 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.00 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -0.88 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -1.38 |
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was: 4 hour blood glucose area under urve AUC The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Nanomoles/Liter (nmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.51 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -1.74 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -2.05 |
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was 4 hour c-peptide AUC. The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Nanomoles/Liter (nmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.05 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly | 0.03 |
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly | 0.08 |
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo | 49.71 |
Albiglutide 30 mg | 118.43 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | NA |
Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 12, participants in the albiglutide 50 mg treatment group were uptitrated to receive albiglutide 50 mg for the remainder of the study. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 and 24
Intervention | nanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Week 8 Pre-dose, n=85, 85 | Week 8 Post-dose, n=87, 80 | Week 24 Pre-dose, n=79, 74 | Week 24 Post-dose, n=81, 72 | |
Albiglutide 30 mg | 1582 | 1900 | 1912 | 2289 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | 1433 | 1759 | 3060 | 3484 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 104, n=21, 39, 42 | Week 156, n=14, 30, 32 | |
Albiglutide 30 mg | -0.93 | -0.96 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | -1.18 | -1.07 |
Placebo | -0.40 | -0.61 |
Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameters analyzed were: 4-hour insulin AUC (4 hr Ins AUC), and 4-hour proinsulin AUC (4 hr pro-Ins AUC). The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | picomoles/Liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) | |
---|---|---|
4hr Ins AUC | 4hr Pro-Ins AUC | |
Albiglutide 30 mg | 2.9 | 1.9 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | 39.9 | -10.7 |
Placebo | 49.2 | 1.0 |
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Week 156
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 156, HbA1c <6.5% | Week 156, HbA1c <7.0% | Week 156, HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg | 10 | 18 | 24 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | 11 | 19 | 29 |
Placebo | 6 | 8 | 13 |
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Week 52, HbA1c <6.5% | Week 52, HbA1c <7.0% | Week 52, HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg | 25 | 49 | 59 |
Albiglutide 50 mg | 24 | 39 | 62 |
Placebo | 10 | 21 | 34 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Nine par. with post-BL values obtained >14 days after the last dose or after hyperglycemic rescue were included in the analysis population but were not analyzed for this endpoint. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 0.33 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.80 |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.55 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.40 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | 4.43 |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.42 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 0.64 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | -1.74 |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.69 |
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 49.57 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | NA |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | 137.71 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. This analysis used observed body weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104 | Week 156, n=9, 90, 71 | |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.90 | -1.53 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | 6.28 | 6.52 |
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | -2.16 | -4.47 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed FPG values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 104, n=12, 128, 103 | Week 156, n=9, 88, 71 | |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.99 | -0.88 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | -1.98 | -1.94 |
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 0.43 | -0.50 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104 | Week 156, n=9, 89, 71 | |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.76 | -0.46 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | -1.09 | -0.97 |
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | -0.32 | -0.10 |
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) was assessed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 156
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7.0% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | 16 | 26 | 45 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | 23 | 44 | 68 |
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 1 | 3 | 5 |
The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) was assessed. Values were carried forward for participants who were rescued or discontinued from active treatment before Week 52. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7.0% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride | 27 | 79 | 126 |
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride | 37 | 94 | 150 |
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride | 4 | 10 | 19 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 104 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. Difference of least squares means (albiglutide - placebo, albiglutide - sitagliptin, albiglutide - glimepiride) is from the ANCOVA model. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-Baseline HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | 0.27 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -0.28 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | -0.36 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -0.63 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Kilograms (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | -1.00 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -0.86 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | 1.17 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -1.21 |
The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. This analysis used observed body weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Kilograms (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | -3.61 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -2.05 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | 0.98 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -2.31 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | 0.55 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -0.12 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | -0.41 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -0.98 |
The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed FPG values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Millimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | -0.11 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -0.50 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | -0.71 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -1.30 |
HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed . (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | -0.46 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | -0.56 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | -0.59 |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | -0.88 |
Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue.The conditions for hyperglycemic rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)
Intervention | Weeks (Median) |
---|---|
Placebo Plus Metformin | 67.71 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | NA |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | NA |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | NA |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Week 104
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7.0% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | 50 | 113 | 172 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | 40 | 94 | 147 |
Placebo Plus Metformin | 7 | 15 | 27 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | 45 | 94 | 132 |
The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Week 156
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
HbA1c <6.5% | HbA1c <7.0% | HbA1c <7.5% | |
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin | 31 | 69 | 90 |
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin | 15 | 44 | 69 |
Placebo Plus Metformin | 4 | 7 | 13 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin | 23 | 44 | 69 |
To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in the 2-h post-challenge plasma glucose rise as a response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) from baseline to Week 24. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | -37.5 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | -32.0 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | -34.9 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | -6.0 |
To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reduction in body weight or less weight gain after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | -1.18 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | -1.56 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | -2.26 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | -0.72 |
To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in body weight or less weight gain in participants with baseline BMI ≥27 kg/m2 after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | -1.17 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | -1.74 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | -2.47 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | -0.80 |
To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride leads to greater reductions in FPG after 24 weeks of treatment compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | -16.8 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | -21.2 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | -28.5 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | -2.0 |
To assess the efficacy of dapagliflozin compared to placebo as add-on therapy to glimepiride in improving glycemic control in participants with type 2 diabetes, as determined by the change in HbA1C levels from baseline to the end of the 24-week double-blind treatment period. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | -0.58 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | -0.63 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | -0.82 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | -0.13 |
To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in a larger proportion of participants achieving a therapeutic glycemic response, defined as HbA1c < 7% after 24 weeks of treatment, compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: At Week 24
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride | 26.8 |
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride | 30.3 |
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride | 31.7 |
Placebo + Glimepiride | 13.0 |
Percent of BG between 70 and 180 mg/dL, as measured using Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | Percentage of Blood Glucose (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 57.6 | 69.2 |
an Exercise Group | 63.7 | 46.4 |
MAGE describes the average amplitude of glycemic variations measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: before vs. at 3 months
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 108 | 123 |
an Exercise Group | 129 | 139 |
change in glycated hemoglobin (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | percentage of total hemoglobin (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 8.3 | 8.4 |
an Exercise Group | 7.9 | 8.0 |
Change in insulin dose (Units/kg/day) used at home (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | Units/kg/day (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 0.98 | 1.0 |
an Exercise Group | 1.0 | 0.8 |
Change in insulin sensitivity score, determined using SEARCH ISS model published equation: logeIS = 4.64725 - 0.02032 × (waist, cm) - 0.09779 × (HbA1c, %) - 0.00235 × (Triglycerides, mg/dL). The range of ISS scores is between 1-15. Higher scores imply a better insulin sensistivity. (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | score on a scale (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 2.10 | 2.16 |
an Exercise Group | 2.17 | 2.20 |
Change in Percent of BG above 180 mg, as determined using Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | Percentage of Blood Glucose (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
basline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 39.4 | 26.6 |
an Exercise Group | 29.1 | 46.4 |
Change in Percent of BG below 70 mg/dL, as determined by Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months
Intervention | Percentage of Blood Glucose (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
baseline | at 3 months | |
an Exercise + Glutamine Group | 3.1 | 4.4 |
an Exercise Group | 7.2 | 7.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.65 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.74 |
Glimepiride | -0.55 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.82 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.93 |
Glimepiride | -0.81 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -4.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.7 |
Glimepiride | 1.0 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 5.6 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 4.9 |
Glimepiride | 34.2 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 30 to determine the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -0.32 |
Glimepiride | -0.51 |
Plasma samples were collected from participants after an overnight fast at baseline and Week 30 to determine the mean change from baseline in participant FPG. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | -14.5 |
Glimepiride | -21.2 |
Participants were only permitted to wear a drape gown and undergarments (no street clothes, no shoes or socks) for this evaluation. Body weight was measured after voiding (to the nearest 0.1 kg) and measurements were collected until 2 consecutive measurements did not differ by more than 0.2 kg from each other. Body weight measurements were evaluated using a standardized, calibrated digital scale and was reported in kilograms (kg) at baseline and Week 30. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 0.4 |
Glimepiride | 1.1 |
"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 3 |
Glimepiride | 4 |
"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 118 |
Glimepiride | 115 |
Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an episode with clinical symptoms attributed to hypoglycemia, without regard to glucose level. Participants were instructed to complete the Hypoglycemia Assessment Log (HAL) for any symptomatic episodes he or she believed represent hypoglycemia. If a fingerstick glucose was obtained before or shortly (i.e., within a few minutes) after treating, the value was recorded in the HAL. In addition, participants were instructed to record in the HAL any fingerstick glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) regardless of the presence of clinical symptoms. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 2 |
Glimepiride | 11 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30. Hemoglobin A1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 9.1 |
Glimepiride | 20.9 |
Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin | 33.5 |
Glimepiride | 46.6 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -29.9 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -5.85 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.03 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -0.66 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -5.06 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 0.85 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.5 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 0.3 |
The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 7.6 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 0.6 |
The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 9.6 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 11.9 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Week 52
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 47.6 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 35.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | -9.79 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -47.9 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -57.1 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -49.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | 2.47 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -27.3 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -37.8 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -20.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -26.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -35.2 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -17.7 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | -0.17 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.79 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.94 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -0.82 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.73 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.88 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -0.73 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | 1.52 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.84 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -5.06 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -1.83 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.53 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.65 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -0.66 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | -1.2 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.2 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -1.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.2 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -1.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | 3.7 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 10.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 12.1 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 5.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 11.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 13.3 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 6.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | 3.2 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 1.6 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.4 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 1.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 1.9 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 2.7 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | -0.4 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences between each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group and placebo. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo/Sitagliptin | 29.8 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 45.5 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 57.8 |
Sitagliptin 100 mg | 54.5 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -118 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -126 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 5.19 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -42.9 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -58.8 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -81.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -86.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 8.33 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -27.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -35.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -2.13 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.56 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.14 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.77 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.03 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -4.47 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.97 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.38 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.34 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -5.04 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.0 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -3.8 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.6 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -2.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -3.9 |
The table below shows the least-squares mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 2.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 10.8 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.4 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 11.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 10.5 |
The table below shows the least-squares mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.6 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -12.7 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.8 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 2.5 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.4 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 17.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 11.6 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 20.6 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 44.5 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 62.4 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 4.11 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -18.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -30.5 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.13 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.85 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.06 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -2.65 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -4.89 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -4.27 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.7 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -2.1 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.6 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 3.2 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 5.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 6.5 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 11.6 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 5.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 8.5 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 18 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 43.2 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 56.6 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.39 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -18.1 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -20.3 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.03 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.60 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.73 |
Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.00 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.03 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.18 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | mmHg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.10 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -3.52 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -6.79 |
Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.02 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.04 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.18 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.28 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -1.87 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -2.38 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.1 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -2.4 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -3.1 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.8 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -1.0 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -0.6 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 1.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 6.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 6.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 0.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 0.2 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | -0.5 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | -0.9 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | -1.0 |
The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26
Intervention | Percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Placebo | 7.7 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 2.8 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 8.4 |
The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Week 26
Intervention | Percentage of patients (Number) |
---|---|
Placebo | 28.0 |
Canagliflozin 100 mg | 47.7 |
Canagliflozin 300 mg | 58.5 |
Change in body weight following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., body weight at Week 30 minus body weight at baseline) (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | -0.83 |
Glimepiride | 0.90 |
Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis (collected after an 8- to 10-hour fast). FPG is expressed as mg/dL. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 30 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 30 minus FPG at baseline). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | -47.0 |
Glimepiride | -23.5 |
HbA1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over a prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Change in A1C following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., A1C at Week 30 minus A1C at baseline). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30
Intervention | Percent of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | -1.5 |
Glimepiride | -0.7 |
An AE is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | 8 |
Glimepiride | 8 |
An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to 32 weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | 88 |
Glimepiride | 101 |
HbA1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over a prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of Participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | 81.2 |
Glimepiride | 40.1 |
Symptomatic episodes assessed as likely to be due to hypoglycemia were reported by investigators as adverse experiences of hypoglycemia. Adverse experiences of hypoglycemia were based on all reports of hypoglycemia; a concurrent glucose measurement was not required. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30
Intervention | Percentage of participants (Number) |
---|---|
Sitagliptin/Metformin | 5.5 |
Glimepiride | 20.1 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.70 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.89 |
Glimepiride | 0.95 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.43 |
Lira 1.2 | -1.68 |
Glimepiride | 1.05 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -2.45 |
Lira 1.2 | -2.05 |
Glimepiride | 1.12 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -15.82 |
Lira 1.2 | -9.36 |
Glimepiride | 1.97 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -12.06 |
Lira 1.2 | -5.45 |
Glimepiride | 4.57 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -25.57 |
Lira 1.2 | -15.21 |
Glimepiride | -5.29 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.88 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.59 |
Glimepiride | -0.28 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -0.71 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.44 |
Glimepiride | -0.16 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -1.14 |
Lira 1.2 | -0.84 |
Glimepiride | -0.51 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.15 |
Lira 1.2 | -27.34 |
Glimepiride | -24.85 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -34.83 |
Lira 1.2 | -25.68 |
Glimepiride | -23.84 |
Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -37.4 |
Lira 1.2 | -30.8 |
Glimepiride | -24.5 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.76 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.28 |
Glimepiride | -7.95 |
Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -11.01 |
Lira 1.2 | -7.53 |
Glimepiride | -7.97 |
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52
Intervention | mg/dL (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 1.8 | -9.6 |
Lira 1.2 | -8.4 |
Glimepiride | -5.6 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 0 | 533 | 405 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 68 | 133 |
Lira 1.8 | 1 | 71 | 87 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Glimepiride | 1 | 34 | 4 |
Lira 1.2 | 0 | 3 | 1 |
Lira 1.8 | 0 | 13 | 3 |
"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 64.48 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 27.30 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 17.81 |
Met Mono | -7.89 |
Met + Glim | 11.25 |
"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | percentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | 20.45 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 20.33 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 26.12 |
Met Mono | -1.63 |
Met + Glim | 24.68 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -2.07 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -3.03 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.91 |
Met Mono | -1.80 |
Met + Glim | 0.70 |
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | kg (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.78 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.58 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.79 |
Met Mono | -1.51 |
Met + Glim | 0.95 |
Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.80 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.20 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.18 |
Met Mono | 0.75 |
Met + Glim | -0.64 |
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.13 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -1.63 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.68 |
Met Mono | 0.40 |
Met + Glim | -1.31 |
Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | percentage of total haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.36 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.56 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.58 |
Met Mono | 0.25 |
Met + Glim | -0.50 |
Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | Percentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.69 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.97 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -1.00 |
Met Mono | 0.09 |
Met + Glim | -0.98 |
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.59 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.22 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.10 |
Met Mono | -0.43 |
Met + Glim | -1.80 |
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -1.68 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -2.33 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -2.57 |
Met Mono | -0.62 |
Met + Glim | -2.46 |
"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104
Intervention | mmol/L (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.27 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.56 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.44 |
Met Mono | -0.20 |
Met + Glim | -0.29 |
"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26
Intervention | mmol/l (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Lira 0.6 + Met | -0.23 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | -0.40 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | -0.56 |
Met Mono | -0.44 |
Met + Glim | -0.44 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104
Intervention | episodes (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
All | Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 52 | 0 | 23 | 29 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 51 | 1 | 26 | 24 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 49 | 0 | 22 | 27 |
Met + Glim | 524 | 0 | 284 | 240 |
Met Mono | 18 | 0 | 6 | 12 |
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-26
Intervention | episodes (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Major | Minor | Symptoms only | |
Lira 0.6 + Met | 0 | 15 | 17 |
Lira 1.2 + Met | 0 | 3 | 7 |
Lira 1.8 + Met | 0 | 9 | 22 |
Met + Glim | 0 | 136 | 175 |
Met Mono | 0 | 6 | 10 |
3 reviews available for glimepiride and Body Weight
Article | Year |
---|---|
Optimizing outcomes for GLP-1 agonists.
Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide | 2011 |
Glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the worldwide therapeutic experience.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relat | 2003 |
[Retrolective study design -- a new tool of evidence-based medicine].
Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | 2005 |
28 trials available for glimepiride and Body Weight
Article | Year |
---|---|
Comparison of the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study.
Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium; Fema | 2022 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L | 2017 |
Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr
Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female; | 2019 |
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.
Topics: Aged; Asian People; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind | 2020 |
[Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride].
Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Me | 2013 |
HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin.
Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female | 2014 |
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther | 2015 |
Efficacy and Tolerability of Sitagliptin Compared with Glimepiride in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.
Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet; D | 2015 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D | 2016 |
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicenter randomized double-blind study.
Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Th | 2017 |
Fifty-two-week efficacy and safety of vildagliptin vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Adminis | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio | 2009 |
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema | 2010 |
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema | 2010 |
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema | 2010 |
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema | 2010 |
Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study.
Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr | 2010 |
Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, provides sustained improvements in glycaemic control and weight for 2 years as monotherapy compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Pe | 2011 |
Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Femal | 2011 |
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2012 |
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2012 |
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2012 |
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2012 |
Comparing the efficacy and safety profile of sitagliptin versus glimepiride in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin alone.
Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationsh | 2012 |
Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyca | 2013 |
Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fol | 2003 |
Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2003 |
Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study administering glimepiride to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with rosiglitazone monotherapy.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; | 2004 |
Comparative efficacy of glimepiride and/or metformin with insulin in type 2 diabetes.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 | 2006 |
Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type | 2006 |
Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride.
Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relati | 2006 |
Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a sulphonylurea.
Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pept | 2008 |
Predictors of response to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Apolipoproteins; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; | 2001 |
Vascular effects of glibenclamide vs. glimepiride and metformin in Type 2 diabetic patients.
Topics: Acetylcholine; Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; C-Pep | 2002 |
12 other studies available for glimepiride and Body Weight
Article | Year |
---|---|
Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Com | 2018 |
Add-On Treatment with Liraglutide Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Therapy.
Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, | 2015 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha | 2016 |
Oral glyburide, but not glimepiride, blocks the infarct-size limiting effects of pioglitazone.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Body Weight; Coronary Vessels; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Deca | 2008 |
Anti-hyperglycemic effects and mechanism of Bidens pilosa water extract.
Topics: Animals; Bidens; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; | 2009 |
Treatment with glimepiride, but not mitiglinide and short-acting insulin, resists body weight and abdominal fat reduction under dietary energy restriction.
Topics: Abdominal Fat; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Female; Humans; Insulin; Isoi | 2009 |
Changes in body composition after 9 months of treatment with exenatide twice daily versus glimepiride: comment letter on Jendle et al.
Topics: Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Hu | 2010 |
Reduced cell proliferation and neuroblast differentiation in the dentate gyrus of high fat diet-fed mice are ameliorated by metformin and glimepiride treatment.
Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; D | 2011 |
Effect of piperine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Alkaloids; Animals; Antioxidants; Area Under Curve; Aspartate Aminotransferase | 2012 |
The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia.
Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Body Weight; Glutathione; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Malondial | 2003 |
[Hardly any hypoglycemias, constant weight--and still cost effective].
Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drugs, Generic; Glyburide; Humans; Hy | 2005 |
The effects of nicotinamide and glimepiride on diabetes prevention in BB rats.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Animals; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Hypoglycem | 1995 |