Page last updated: 2024-10-27

glimepiride and Body Weight

glimepiride has been researched along with Body Weight in 43 studies

glimepiride: structure given in first source

Body Weight: The mass or quantity of heaviness of an individual. It is expressed by units of pounds or kilograms.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."9.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exenatide compared to glimepiride on body weight, glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients taking metformin."9.15Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bonaventura, A; Bossi, AC; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Franzetti, IG; Guazzini, B; Maffioli, P; Putignano, P; Querci, F; Testori, G, 2011)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."9.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
"Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control."9.10Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. ( Beuth, J; Kolb, H; Martin, S; Scherbaum, WA; Schneider, B; van Leendert, R, 2003)
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks."7.83Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016)
"The aim of this work was to determine whether glimepiride, a derivate of sulphonylurea of the hypoglycemic effect, influences the level of prooxidative factors and antioxidative enzymes activity in the course of experimental streptozotocin hyperglycemia in rats."7.72The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia. ( Grzymisławski, M; Koźlik, J; Krauss, H; Mikrut, K; Paluszak, J; Piatek, J; Sosnowski, P, 2003)
"Mean body weight was reduced from 79."6.71Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study. ( Klingler, A; Lechleitner, M; Luger, A; Weitgasser, R, 2003)
"Men with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are often characterised by low testosterone (T)."5.48Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity. ( Hao, M; Kuang, HY; Li, BW; Ma, XF; Pan, J; Shao, N; Wu, WH; Yu, XY; Yu, YM; Zhang, HJ, 2018)
"This study provides evidence that, compared to glimepiride, saxagliptin more effectively achieves a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in T2D patients who are inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy, especially in overweight patients with moderate hyperglycaemia and a relatively short duration of diabetes."5.30Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr ( Bi, Y; Cheng, J; Gu, T; Li, D; Ma, J; Shao, J; Shi, B; Sun, Z; Xu, L; Zhang, H; Zhang, Q; Zhong, S; Zhu, D; Zhu, L, 2019)
"Compared with glimepiride, Sita/Met as an initial treatment led to significantly greater improvements in glycemic control and body weight changes, with a lower incidence of hypoglycemia, over 30 weeks."5.24Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicenter randomized double-blind study. ( Chung, SC; Kim, IJ; Kim, SS; Kim, YI; Lee, KJ; Lee, SJ; Lee, YS; Park, JH, 2017)
"Changes from baseline in HbA1c, body weight, and systolic blood pressure (BP) with canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg versus placebo or active comparator (i."5.22Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America. ( Alba, M; Cerdas, S; Chacon, Mdel P; Eliaschewitz, FG; Lavalle-González, FJ; Tong, C, 2016)
"The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of exenatide compared to glimepiride on body weight, glycemic control and insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients taking metformin."5.15Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients. ( Bonaventura, A; Bossi, AC; Derosa, G; Fogari, E; Franzetti, IG; Guazzini, B; Maffioli, P; Putignano, P; Querci, F; Testori, G, 2011)
"Liraglutide monotherapy for 2 years provides significant and sustained improvements in glycaemic control and body weight compared with glimepiride monotherapy, at a lower risk of hypoglycaemia."5.15Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, provides sustained improvements in glycaemic control and weight for 2 years as monotherapy compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes. ( Bode, B; Chang, CT; Garber, A; Hale, P; Henry, RR; Ratner, R, 2011)
"The aim of the study was to compare the effects of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride on metabolic and insulin resistance related-indices in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients (T2DM)."5.14Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients. ( Ciccarelli, L; D'Angelo, A; Derosa, G; Ferrari, I; Franzetti, IG; Gadaleta, G; Maffioli, P; Mereu, R; Piccinni, MN; Querci, F; Ragonesi, PD; Salvadeo, SA, 2010)
"Vildagliptin add-on has similar efficacy to glimepiride after 2 years' treatment, with markedly reduced hypoglycaemia risk and no weight gain."5.14Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study. ( Ahren, B; Couturier, A; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Foley, JE; Fonseca, V; Matthews, DR; Zinman, B, 2010)
"To compare the incidence of nocturnal hypoglycemia and glycemic control following bedtime or morning insulin glargine (LANTUS; glargine) plus glimepiride."5.12Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility. ( Maxeiner, S; Raptis, S; Standl, E, 2006)
"Initial treatment of Type 2 diabetes with glimepiride was associated with a significantly greater decrease in body weight and body mass index than treatment with glibenclamide, while providing equivalent glycaemic control."5.10Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study. ( Beuth, J; Kolb, H; Martin, S; Scherbaum, WA; Schneider, B; van Leendert, R, 2003)
"Canagliflozin 100 and 300 mg provided sustained reductions in body weight, BMI, and waist circumference in a greater proportion of patients with T2DM versus glimepiride or placebo over 104 weeks."3.83Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks. ( Blonde, L; Canovatchel, W; Fung, A; Meininger, G; Stenlöf, K; Xie, J, 2016)
"The aim of this work was to determine whether glimepiride, a derivate of sulphonylurea of the hypoglycemic effect, influences the level of prooxidative factors and antioxidative enzymes activity in the course of experimental streptozotocin hyperglycemia in rats."3.72The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia. ( Grzymisławski, M; Koźlik, J; Krauss, H; Mikrut, K; Paluszak, J; Piatek, J; Sosnowski, P, 2003)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes who have cardiovascular disease and are receiving empagliflozin have a lower rate of primary composite cardiovascular outcomes."3.11Comparison of the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study. ( Hasebe, M; Ito, K; Kondo, Y; Satoh, S; Tamura, H; Terauchi, Y, 2022)
" The most frequent gastrointestinal drug-related adverse events with dulaglutide were diarrhea, abdominal distension, nausea and vomiting."2.94Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study. ( Chen, LL; Du, LY; Li, QM; Li, YB; Liu, XM; Ma, JH; Shi, LX; Shi, YQ; Wang, F, 2020)
"These 3-year efficacy data support long-term use of albiglutide in the management of people with T2DM."2.84Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy. ( Ahrén, B; Ambery, P; Carr, MC; Cirkel, DT; Home, PD; Miller, D; Nauck, MA; Rendell, M; Reusch, JEB; Weissman, PN, 2017)
"Patients with type 2 diabetes receiving metformin were randomized to albiglutide (30 mg), sitagliptin (100 mg), glimepiride (2 mg), or placebo."2.79HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin. ( Ahrén, B; Cirkel, DT; Feinglos, MN; Johnson, SL; Perry, C; Stewart, M; Yang, F, 2014)
"Insulin resistance was improved significantly with HOMA-IR decreasing from 2."2.78Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Duan, WR; Gao, Y; Guo, XH; Han, P; Lv, XF; Yang, HZ; Zhang, XZ, 2013)
" The incidence of adverse events (AEs), serious AEs and adjudicated cardiovascular events was 74."2.74Fifty-two-week efficacy and safety of vildagliptin vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy. ( Ahrén, B; Byiers, S; Dejager, S; Ferrannini, E; Fonseca, V; Matthews, D; Shao, Q; Zinman, B, 2009)
"placebo in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) who are inadequately controlled [haemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) 7."2.73Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a sulphonylurea. ( Banerji, MA; Baron, MA; Camisasca, RP; Couturier, A; Ebeling, P; Foley, JE; Garber, AJ; Gudbjörnsdottir, S, 2008)
"Starting insulin in Type 2 diabetes patients with twice-daily BIAsp 30 plus met can reduce HbA (1c) and mean prandial plasma glucose increment to a greater extent than once-daily glarg plus glim."2.72Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride. ( Kann, PH; Medding, J; Moeller, J; Mokan, M; Mrevlje, F; Regulski, M; Szocs, A; Wascher, T; Zackova, V, 2006)
"Mean body weight was reduced from 79."2.71Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study. ( Klingler, A; Lechleitner, M; Luger, A; Weitgasser, R, 2003)
"Two groups of 12 Type 2 diabetes mellitus patients participated in a double-blind randomized cross-over study consisting of two 8-week periods, in which treatment with orally administered glibenclamide (15 mg/day) was compared with either glimepiride or metformin (6 mg and 1500 mg/day, respectively)."2.70Vascular effects of glibenclamide vs. glimepiride and metformin in Type 2 diabetic patients. ( Abbink, EJ; Jansen van Rosendaal, A; Lutterman, JA; Pickkers, P; Russel, FG; Smits, P; Tack, CJ, 2002)
"Patients aged 35-70 years with poorly controlled diabetes [fasting plasma glucose (FPG) > or =1,40 g/l and < 3 g/l at baseline] were treated with glimepiride for 6 months, with dosage titrated from 1-6 mg daily, depending on the monthly FPG measurement."2.70Predictors of response to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. ( Altman, JJ; Charpentier, G; Derobert, E; Etienne, S; Fleury, F; Grimaldi, A; Halimi, S; Oriol, V; Vaur, L, 2001)
"The management of type 2 diabetes mellitus and, in particular, blood glucose levels can be complex and challenging for physicians and patients."2.47Optimizing outcomes for GLP-1 agonists. ( Freeman, JS, 2011)
"Glimepiride is a once-daily SU that was introduced in 1995."2.42Glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the worldwide therapeutic experience. ( Massi-Benedetti, M, 2003)
"Men with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and obesity are often characterised by low testosterone (T)."1.48Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity. ( Hao, M; Kuang, HY; Li, BW; Ma, XF; Pan, J; Shao, N; Wu, WH; Yu, XY; Yu, YM; Zhang, HJ, 2018)
"Treatment with liraglutide resulted in mean decreases in hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of -1."1.42Add-On Treatment with Liraglutide Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Therapy. ( Brunetti, A; Capula, C; Chiefari, E; Foti, D; Greco, M; Liguori, R; Oliverio, R; Puccio, L; Pullano, V; Tirinato, D; Vero, A; Vero, R, 2015)
" In normal and streptozotocin induced diabetic rats the combination of glimepiride with piperine increased all the pharmacokinetic parameters, such as Cmax, AUC0-n, AUCtotal, t1/2, and MRT, and decreased the clearance, Vd, markedly as compared with the control group."1.38Effect of piperine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. ( Rani, TS; Sujatha, S; Veeresham, C, 2012)
"Glimepiride is an oral sulfonylurea drug; nicotinamide is an inhibitor of poly (ADP-ribose) synthetase and a precursor of NAD."1.29The effects of nicotinamide and glimepiride on diabetes prevention in BB rats. ( Chan, EK; Charles, MA; Cheta, D; Pan, J; Schranz, V, 1995)

Research

Studies (43)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's1 (2.33)18.2507
2000's18 (41.86)29.6817
2010's22 (51.16)24.3611
2020's2 (4.65)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Tamura, H1
Kondo, Y1
Ito, K1
Hasebe, M1
Satoh, S1
Terauchi, Y1
Home, PD1
Ahrén, B4
Reusch, JEB1
Rendell, M1
Weissman, PN1
Cirkel, DT2
Miller, D1
Ambery, P1
Carr, MC1
Nauck, MA2
Shao, N1
Yu, XY1
Yu, YM1
Li, BW1
Pan, J2
Wu, WH1
Zhang, HJ1
Ma, XF1
Hao, M1
Kuang, HY1
Gu, T1
Ma, J1
Zhang, Q1
Zhu, L1
Zhang, H1
Xu, L1
Cheng, J1
Shi, B1
Li, D1
Shao, J1
Sun, Z1
Zhong, S1
Bi, Y1
Zhu, D1
Shi, LX1
Liu, XM1
Shi, YQ1
Li, QM1
Ma, JH1
Li, YB1
Du, LY1
Wang, F1
Chen, LL1
Strojek, K1
Yoon, KH2
Hruba, V1
Elze, M1
Langkilde, AM1
Parikh, S1
Johnson, SL1
Stewart, M1
Yang, F1
Perry, C1
Feinglos, MN1
Leiter, LA1
Arias, P1
Langslet, G1
Xie, J2
Balis, DA1
Millington, D1
Vercruysse, F1
Canovatchel, W2
Meininger, G2
Chiefari, E1
Capula, C1
Vero, A1
Oliverio, R1
Puccio, L1
Liguori, R1
Pullano, V1
Greco, M1
Foti, D1
Tirinato, D1
Vero, R1
Brunetti, A1
Hartley, P1
Shentu, Y1
Betz-Schiff, P1
Golm, GT1
Sisk, CM1
Engel, SS1
Shankar, RR1
Lavalle-González, FJ1
Eliaschewitz, FG1
Cerdas, S1
Chacon, Mdel P1
Tong, C1
Alba, M1
Blonde, L1
Stenlöf, K1
Fung, A1
Kim, SS1
Kim, IJ1
Lee, KJ1
Park, JH1
Kim, YI1
Lee, YS1
Chung, SC1
Lee, SJ1
Ye, Y1
Lin, Y1
Perez-Polo, JR1
Birnbaum, Y1
Ferrannini, E2
Fonseca, V2
Zinman, B2
Matthews, D1
Byiers, S1
Shao, Q1
Dejager, S2
Hsu, YJ1
Lee, TH1
Chang, CL1
Huang, YT1
Yang, WC1
Nakano, T1
Inoue, I1
Satoh, K1
Yamazaki, M1
Awata, T1
Kurihara, S1
Goto, S1
Shinoda, Y1
Komoda, T1
Katayama, S1
Jendle, J1
Matthews, DR2
Frid, A1
Hermansen, K1
Düring, M1
Zdravkovic, M2
Strauss, BJ1
Garber, AJ2
Derosa, G2
Maffioli, P2
Ferrari, I1
Mereu, R1
Ragonesi, PD1
Querci, F2
Franzetti, IG2
Gadaleta, G1
Ciccarelli, L1
Piccinni, MN1
D'Angelo, A1
Salvadeo, SA1
Couturier, A2
Foley, JE2
Gallwitz, B1
Haupt, A1
Kraus, P1
Peters, N1
Petto, H2
Dotta, F1
Poll, L1
Rose, L1
Schernthaner, G1
Garber, A1
Henry, RR1
Ratner, R1
Hale, P1
Chang, CT1
Bode, B1
Freeman, JS1
Putignano, P1
Bossi, AC1
Bonaventura, A1
Guazzini, B1
Testori, G1
Fogari, E1
Yoo, DY1
Kim, W1
Nam, SM1
Yoo, KY1
Lee, CH1
Choi, JH1
Won, MH1
Hwang, IK1
Yoon, YS1
Horowitz, M1
Flint, A1
Jones, KL1
Hindsberger, C1
Rasmussen, MF1
Kapitza, C1
Doran, S1
Jax, T1
Chapman, IM1
Srivastava, S1
Saxena, GN1
Keshwani, P1
Gupta, R1
Veeresham, C1
Sujatha, S1
Rani, TS1
Guo, XH1
Lv, XF1
Han, P1
Zhang, XZ1
Yang, HZ1
Duan, WR1
Gao, Y1
Weitgasser, R1
Lechleitner, M1
Luger, A1
Klingler, A1
Massi-Benedetti, M1
Krauss, H1
Koźlik, J1
Grzymisławski, M1
Sosnowski, P1
Mikrut, K1
Piatek, J1
Paluszak, J1
Martin, S2
Kolb, H1
Beuth, J1
van Leendert, R1
Schneider, B1
Scherbaum, WA1
McCluskey, D2
Touger, MS1
Melis, R1
Schleusener, DS1
Kabadi, UM1
Kabadi, M1
Standl, E1
Maxeiner, S1
Raptis, S1
Kann, PH1
Wascher, T1
Zackova, V1
Moeller, J1
Medding, J1
Szocs, A1
Mokan, M1
Mrevlje, F1
Regulski, M1
Banerji, MA1
Ebeling, P1
Gudbjörnsdottir, S1
Camisasca, RP1
Baron, MA1
Chan, EK1
Cheta, D1
Schranz, V1
Charles, MA1
Charpentier, G1
Vaur, L1
Halimi, S1
Fleury, F1
Derobert, E1
Grimaldi, A1
Oriol, V1
Etienne, S1
Altman, JJ1
Abbink, EJ1
Pickkers, P1
Jansen van Rosendaal, A1
Lutterman, JA1
Tack, CJ1
Russel, FG1
Smits, P1

Clinical Trials (26)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide When Used in Combination With Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00849056]Phase 3310 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Open-label, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Long-term Safety of Albiglutide Compared With Insulin in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.[NCT00838916]Phase 3779 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Two Dose Levels of Albiglutide Compared With Placebo in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00849017]Phase 3309 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-01-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel-group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide Administered in Combination With Metformin and Glimepiride Compared With Metformin Plus Glimepiride and Placeb[NCT00839527]Phase 3685 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Albiglutide When Used in Combination With Metformin Compared With Metformin Plus Sitagliptin, Metformin Plus Glimepiride, [NCT00838903]Phase 31,049 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-02-28Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Saxagliptin and Glimepiride in Chinese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Controlled Inadequately With Metformin Monotherapy (SPECIFY Study) : a 48-week, Multi-center, Randomized, Open-label Trial[NCT02280486]Phase 4388 participants (Actual)Interventional2015-01-31Completed
A 24-Week,Int.,Rand.,Double-blind,Parallel-group,Multi-centre, Plac.-Controlled Phase III Study With a 24-Wk Ext.Per.to Eval.the Efficacy and Safety of Dapagliflozin in Comb.With Glimepiride (a Sulphonylurea) in Subjects With Type2 Diab.Who Have Inadeq. G[NCT00680745]Phase 3597 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-04-30Completed
Exercise Snacks and Glutamine to Improve Glucose Control in Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes[NCT03199638]14 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-04-01Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, 3-Arm Parallel-Group, 2-Year (104-Week), Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of JNJ-28431754 Compared With Glimepiride in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Not Optimally Co[NCT00968812]Phase 31,452 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-09-30Completed
A Phase III, Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Sitagliptin Compared With Glimepiride in Elderly Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control[NCT01189890]Phase 3480 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-08-16Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active-Controlled, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Versus Sitagliptin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Metformi[NCT01137812]Phase 3756 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-07-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo and Active-Controlled, 4-Arm, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Con[NCT01106677]Phase 31,284 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin as Monotherapy in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Controlled With Di[NCT01081834]Phase 3678 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-03-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 3-Arm, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin in the Treatment of Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus With Inadequate Glycemic Control on Met[NCT01106625]Phase 3469 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-31Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Canagliflozin Compared With Placebo in the Treatment of Older Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Inadequately Contr[NCT01106651]Phase 3716 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double Blind Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Sitagliptin/Metformin Fixed-Dose Combination (Janumet®) Compared to Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT00993187]Phase 4292 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-05-04Completed
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-3): Effect on Glycemic Control of Liraglutide Versus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00294723]Phase 3746 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-02-28Terminated (stopped due to The trial was terminated at week 195 due to an insufficient number of subjects remaining to obtain reasonable statistical power)
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-2): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy Versus Metformin and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Subjects With[NCT00318461]Phase 31,091 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-05-31Completed
Magnetic Resonance Assessment of Victoza Efficacy in the Regression of Cardiovascular Dysfunction In Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus[NCT01761318]Phase 450 participants (Actual)Interventional2013-11-30Completed
The Effect of Adding Vildagliptin Versus Glimepiride to Metformin on Markers of Inflammation, Thrombosis, and Atherosclerosis in Diabetic Patients With Symptomatic Coronary Artery Diseases[NCT03693560]Phase 480 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-10-08Completed
Effects of Vildagliptin/Metformin Combination on Markers of Atherosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Inflammation in Diabetic Patients With Coronary Artery Disease[NCT01604213]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2012-09-30Completed
Brown Adipose Tissue Activity in Response to Semaglutide Administered to Obese Subjects.[NCT05419726]20 participants (Anticipated)Observational2023-02-01Recruiting
A 4 Week Single Center, Double-dummy, Randomised Double-blind, Balanced Incomplete Latin Square Design Study to Evaluate the Effects of Liraglutide on Appetite in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Compared to Glimepiride and Placebo[NCT01511692]Phase 143 participants (Actual)Interventional2005-11-30Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Glimepiride as Oral Anti-Diabetic (OAD) Initiation Mono- Therapy in Chinese Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM)[NCT00908921]Phase 4391 participants (Actual)Interventional2009-04-30Completed
Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Biphasic Insulin Aspart 30 Plus Metformin With Insulin Glargine Plus Glimepiride in Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00619697]Phase 4260 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-12-31Completed
Efficacy and Safety of Vildagliptin in Combination With Glimepiride in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes[NCT00099944]Phase 3515 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-05-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. One Intent-to-Treat (ITT) participant (par.) had all post-BL HbA1c measurements occur after hyperglycemic rescue. This par. is included in the ITT Population counts but did not contribute to this analysis. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-0.05
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-0.81

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin1.50
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-0.16

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin0.45
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin0.28

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin0.03
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-1.26

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin0.35
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-1.28

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00849056)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin52.86
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without MetforminNA

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156

,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Week 104, n= 29, 72Week 156, n=26, 54
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-0.92-0.87
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin-0.72-0.50

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <6.5%, and <7.0% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Week 156

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin203244
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin71217

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <6.5%, and <7.0% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00849056)
Timeframe: Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin376696
Placebo + Pioglitazone With or Without Metformin82244

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. Difference of least squares means (albiglutide - insulin glargine) is from the ANCOVA model. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-Baseline HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-0.67
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-0.79

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-3.47
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea0.90

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-1.05
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea1.56

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-0.83
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-2.19

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-0.87
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-2.06

Change From Baseline in Glucose Profile Measured by 24-hour Area Under Curve (AUC) at Week 52

A 24-hour glucose profile was collected at Baseline and Week 52 at a subset of sites in a subset of participants per treatment group using the continuous glucose monitoring device. Glucose measurements were obtained at 5 minute increments in the 24-hour period. The area under the curve (AUC) was determined using the trapezoidal method on the measurements obtained during the first 24 hours of continuous monitoring. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per hour per liter (mmol.h/L) (Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea0.457
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-1.657

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-0.83
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea-1.00

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00838916)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea107.57
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- SulfonylureaNA

Albiglutide Plasma Concentrations at Week 8 and Week 24

Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post-dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants receiving albiglutide were initiated on a 30 mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 4, uptitration of albiglutide was allowed based on glycemic response. As such, albiglutide plasma concentrations achieved at each sampling time represent a mixed population of participants receiving either 30 mg or 50 mg weekly for various durations. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 and 24

Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Week 8, Pre-dose, n=408Week 8, Post-dose, n=398Week 24, Pre-dose, n=416Week 24, Post-dose, n=401
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea1642.831911.352159.302748.15

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Week 156

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea335985
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea184671

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00838916)
Timeframe: Week 52

,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea54156268
Insulin Glargine 10 Units + Metformin +/- Sulfonylurea2578135

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

Glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. The analysis was performed using an Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group, region, history of prior myocardial infarction (yes versus no), and age category (<65 years versus ≥65 years) as factors and Baseline HbA1c as a continuous covariate. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.15
Albiglutide 30 mg-0.70
Albiglutide 50 mg-0.89

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo-2.91
Albiglutide 30 mg-1.32
Albiglutide 50 mg-2.24

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.66
Albiglutide 30 mg-0.39
Albiglutide 50 mg-0.86

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 156

The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline FPG minus the Baseline FPG. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Placebo-0.23
Albiglutide 30 mg-1.31
Albiglutide 50 mg-1.83

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region + current antidiabetic therapy. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.00
Albiglutide 30 mg-0.88
Albiglutide 50 mg-1.38

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter- 4 Hour Blood Glucose AUC

Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was: 4 hour blood glucose area under urve AUC The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionNanomoles/Liter (nmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.51
Albiglutide 30 mg-1.74
Albiglutide 50 mg-2.05

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameter-4 Hour C-peptide AUC

Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameter analyzed was 4 hour c-peptide AUC. The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionNanomoles/Liter (nmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.05
Albiglutide 30 mg Weekly0.03
Albiglutide 50 mg Weekly0.08

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00849017)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo49.71
Albiglutide 30 mg118.43
Albiglutide 50 mgNA

Albiglutide Plasma Concentration at Weeks 8 and 24

Albiglutide plasma concentration data was analyzed at Week 8 pre-dose, Week 8 post dose, Week 24 pre-dose and Week 24 post-dose. All participants who received albiglutide were initiated on a 30mg weekly dosing regimen; however, beginning at Week 12, participants in the albiglutide 50 mg treatment group were uptitrated to receive albiglutide 50 mg for the remainder of the study. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Weeks 8 and 24

,
Interventionnanograms/milliliter (ng/mL) (Mean)
Week 8 Pre-dose, n=85, 85Week 8 Post-dose, n=87, 80Week 24 Pre-dose, n=79, 74Week 24 Post-dose, n=81, 72
Albiglutide 30 mg1582190019122289
Albiglutide 50 mg1433175930603484

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Weeks 104 and 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Weeks 104 and 156

,,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Week 104, n=21, 39, 42Week 156, n=14, 30, 32
Albiglutide 30 mg-0.93-0.96
Albiglutide 50 mg-1.18-1.07
Placebo-0.40-0.61

Change From Baseline in Postprandial Blood Glucose Profile Parameters-4 Hour Insulin AUC and 4 Hour Proinsulin AUC

Changes from Baseline at Week 52 in postprandial parameters after a mixed-meal (MM) tolerance test were analyzed. Post prandial blood glucose parameters analyzed were: 4-hour insulin AUC (4 hr Ins AUC), and 4-hour proinsulin AUC (4 hr pro-Ins AUC). The AUC was determined using the trapezoidal method using measurements until 4 hours following the meal. The standardized AUC is the total AUC divided by elapsed time. Those parameters were analyzed analogous to the primary endpoint using an ANCOVA model with treatment group as a factor, and corresponding Baseline postprandial profile as a continuous covariate. This analysis used observed values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

,,
Interventionpicomoles/Liter (pmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
4hr Ins AUC4hr Pro-Ins AUC
Albiglutide 30 mg2.91.9
Albiglutide 50 mg39.9-10.7
Placebo49.21.0

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 156, HbA1c <6.5%Week 156, HbA1c <7.0%Week 156, HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg101824
Albiglutide 50 mg111929
Placebo6813

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00849017)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
Week 52, HbA1c <6.5%Week 52, HbA1c <7.0%Week 52, HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg254959
Albiglutide 50 mg243962
Placebo102134

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 52

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 52 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-BL HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. Nine par. with post-BL values obtained >14 days after the last dose or after hyperglycemic rescue were included in the analysis population but were not analyzed for this endpoint. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.33
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.80
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.55

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 52

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.40
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride4.43
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.42

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 52

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 52

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.64
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.74
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.69

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue. The conditions for hyperglycemia rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00839527)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride49.57
Pioglitazone + Metformin + GlimepirideNA
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride137.71

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104 and Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. This analysis used observed body weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104Week 156, n=9, 90, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.90-1.53
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride6.286.52
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-2.16-4.47

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 104 and Week 156

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed FPG values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 128, 103Week 156, n=9, 88, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.99-0.88
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.98-1.94
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride0.43-0.50

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 104 and Week 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104, and Week 156

,,
InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Week 104, n=12, 130, 104Week 156, n=9, 89, 71
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.76-0.46
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride-1.09-0.97
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride-0.32-0.10

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) was assessed. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 156

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride162645
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride234468
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride135

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52

The number of participants who acheieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) was assessed. Values were carried forward for participants who were rescued or discontinued from active treatment before Week 52. (NCT00839527)
Timeframe: Week 52

,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide + Metformin + Glimepiride2779126
Pioglitazone + Metformin + Glimepiride3794150
Placebo + Metformin + Glimepiride41019

Change From Baseline (BL) in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 104

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. The BL HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from BL was calculated as the value at Week 104 minus the value at BL. Based on analysis of covariance (ANCOVA): change = treatment + BL HbA1c + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. Difference of least squares means (albiglutide - placebo, albiglutide - sitagliptin, albiglutide - glimepiride) is from the ANCOVA model. The last observation carried forward (LOCF) method was used to impute missing post-Baseline HbA1c values; the last non-missing post-BL on-treatment measurement was used to impute the missing measurement. HbA1c values obtained after hyperglycemic rescue were treated as missing and were replaced with pre-rescue values. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin0.27
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-0.28
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin-0.36
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-0.63

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 104

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline weight values. Weight values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with prerescue values. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline weight + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionKilograms (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin-1.00
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-0.86
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin1.17
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-1.21

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 156

The Baseline value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline weight minus the Baseline weight. This analysis used observed body weight values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionKilograms (Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin-3.61
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-2.05
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin0.98
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-2.31

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 104

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. The LOCF method was used to impute missing post-Baseline FPG values. FPG values obtained after hyperglycemia rescue were treated as missing and replaced with pre-rescue values. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. Based on ANCOVA: change = treatment + Baseline FPG + Baseline HbA1c category + prior myocardial infarction history + age category + region. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 104

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin0.55
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-0.12
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin-0.41
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-0.98

Change From Baseline in FPG at Week 156

The FPG test measures blood sugar levels after the participant has not eaten (fasted) for 12 to 14 hours. The Baseline FPG value is the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed FPG values excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionMillimoles per liter (mmol/L) (Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin-0.11
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-0.50
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin-0.71
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-1.30

Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 156

HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Baseline HbA1c value is defined as the last non-missing value before the start of treatment. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value. This analysis used observed HbA1c values, excluding those obtained after hyperglycemia rescue; no missing data imputation was performed . (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 156

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c in the blood (Mean)
Placebo Plus Metformin-0.46
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin-0.56
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin-0.59
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin-0.88

Time to Hyperglycemia Rescue

Participants who experienced persistent hyperglycemia (high blood glucose) could have qualified for hyperglycemia rescue.The conditions for hyperglycemic rescue were as follows: FPG >=280 milligrams/deciliter (mg/dL) between >=Week 2 and =250 mg/dL between >=Week 4 and =8.5% and a <=0.5% reduction from Baseline between >=Week 12 and =8.5% between >=Week 24 and =8.0% between >= Week 48 and NCT00838903)
Timeframe: From the start of study medication until the end of the treatment (up to Week 156)

InterventionWeeks (Median)
Placebo Plus Metformin67.71
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus MetforminNA
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus MetforminNA
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus MetforminNA

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 104

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 52) were assessed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Week 104

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin50113172
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin4094147
Placebo Plus Metformin71527
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin4594132

Number of Participants Who Achieved Clinically Meaningful HbA1c Response Levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156

The number of participants who achieved the HbA1c treatment goal (i.e., HbA1c response levels of <6.5%, <7%, and <7.5% at Week 156) were assessed. (NCT00838903)
Timeframe: Week 156

,,,
InterventionParticipants (Number)
HbA1c <6.5%HbA1c <7.0%HbA1c <7.5%
Albiglutide 30 mg Plus Metformin316990
Glimepiride 2 mg Plus Metformin154469
Placebo Plus Metformin4713
Sitagliptin 100 mg Plus Metformin234469

Adjusted Mean Change in 2-h Post-challenge Plasma Glucose Rise

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in the 2-h post-challenge plasma glucose rise as a response to an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) from baseline to Week 24. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-37.5
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-32.0
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-34.9
Placebo + Glimepiride-6.0

Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reduction in body weight or less weight gain after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-1.18
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-1.56
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-2.26
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.72

Adjusted Mean Change in Body Weight for Participants With Baseline Body Mass Index (BMI)≥27 kg/m2

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in greater reductions in body weight or less weight gain in participants with baseline BMI ≥27 kg/m2 after 24 weeks of treatment when compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-1.17
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-1.74
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-2.47
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.80

Adjusted Mean Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG)

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride leads to greater reductions in FPG after 24 weeks of treatment compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-16.8
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-21.2
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-28.5
Placebo + Glimepiride-2.0

Adjusted Mean Change in HbA1c Levels

To assess the efficacy of dapagliflozin compared to placebo as add-on therapy to glimepiride in improving glycemic control in participants with type 2 diabetes, as determined by the change in HbA1C levels from baseline to the end of the 24-week double-blind treatment period. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: Baseline to Week 24

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride-0.58
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride-0.63
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride-0.82
Placebo + Glimepiride-0.13

Proportion of Participants Achieving Glycemic Response Defined as HbA1c <7%

To show that dapagliflozin plus glimepiride results in a larger proportion of participants achieving a therapeutic glycemic response, defined as HbA1c < 7% after 24 weeks of treatment, compared to placebo plus glimepiride. (NCT00680745)
Timeframe: At Week 24

InterventionPercentage of participants (Least Squares Mean)
Dapagliflozin 2.5mg + Glimepiride26.8
Dapagliflozin 5mg + Glimepiride30.3
Dapagliflozin 10mg + Glimepiride31.7
Placebo + Glimepiride13.0

Change in Percent of Blood Glucose (BG) Within Target

Percent of BG between 70 and 180 mg/dL, as measured using Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Blood Glucose (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group57.669.2
an Exercise Group63.746.4

Change in the Mean Amplitude of Glycemic Excursions (MAGE)

MAGE describes the average amplitude of glycemic variations measured using continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: before vs. at 3 months

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group108123
an Exercise Group129139

HbA1c, Glycated Hemoglobin

change in glycated hemoglobin (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
Interventionpercentage of total hemoglobin (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group8.38.4
an Exercise Group7.98.0

Insulin Dose

Change in insulin dose (Units/kg/day) used at home (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
InterventionUnits/kg/day (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group0.981.0
an Exercise Group1.00.8

Insulin Sensitivity Score (ISS)

Change in insulin sensitivity score, determined using SEARCH ISS model published equation: logeIS = 4.64725 - 0.02032 × (waist, cm) - 0.09779 × (HbA1c, %) - 0.00235 × (Triglycerides, mg/dL). The range of ISS scores is between 1-15. Higher scores imply a better insulin sensistivity. (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
Interventionscore on a scale (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group2.102.16
an Exercise Group2.172.20

Percent Blood Glucose (BG) >180

Change in Percent of BG above 180 mg, as determined using Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Blood Glucose (Mean)
baslineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group39.426.6
an Exercise Group29.146.4

Percent of BG <70 mg/dL

Change in Percent of BG below 70 mg/dL, as determined by Continuous Glucose Monitor (CGM) (NCT03199638)
Timeframe: baseline vs. at 3 months

,
InterventionPercentage of Blood Glucose (Mean)
baselineat 3 months
an Exercise + Glutamine Group3.14.4
an Exercise Group7.27.2

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 104

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 104 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 104

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.65
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.74
Glimepiride-0.55

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.82
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.93
Glimepiride-0.81

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.7
Glimepiride1.0

Percentage of Patients Experiencing at Least 1 Hypoglycemic Event From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the percentage of patients who experienced at least 1 documented hypoglycemic event from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus glimepiride) in percentages. (NCT00968812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg4.9
Glimepiride34.2

Least Squares (LS) Mean Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at baseline and Week 30 to determine the LS mean HbA1c change from baseline. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

InterventionPercentage of HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-0.32
Glimepiride-0.51

LS Mean Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 30

Plasma samples were collected from participants after an overnight fast at baseline and Week 30 to determine the mean change from baseline in participant FPG. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin-14.5
Glimepiride-21.2

LS Mean Change From Baseline in Participant Body Weight at Week 30

Participants were only permitted to wear a drape gown and undergarments (no street clothes, no shoes or socks) for this evaluation. Body weight was measured after voiding (to the nearest 0.1 kg) and measurements were collected until 2 consecutive measurements did not differ by more than 0.2 kg from each other. Body weight measurements were evaluated using a standardized, calibrated digital scale and was reported in kilograms (kg) at baseline and Week 30. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin0.4
Glimepiride1.1

Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to An AE

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin3
Glimepiride4

Number of Participants Experiencing An Adverse Event (AE)

"An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function, or chemistry of the body temporally associated with the use of the~study treatment, whether or not considered related to the use of the treatment administered." (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin118
Glimepiride115

Number of Participants With an Adverse Event of Symptomatic Hypoglycemia Up to Week 30

Symptomatic hypoglycemia was defined as an episode with clinical symptoms attributed to hypoglycemia, without regard to glucose level. Participants were instructed to complete the Hypoglycemia Assessment Log (HAL) for any symptomatic episodes he or she believed represent hypoglycemia. If a fingerstick glucose was obtained before or shortly (i.e., within a few minutes) after treating, the value was recorded in the HAL. In addition, participants were instructed to record in the HAL any fingerstick glucose values ≤70 mg/dL (≤3.9 mmol/L) regardless of the presence of clinical symptoms. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin2
Glimepiride11

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <6.5% at Week 30. Hemoglobin A1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin9.1
Glimepiride20.9

Percentage of Participants With HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30

Participant whole blood samples were collected at Week 30 to determine the number of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% at Week 30. HbA1c is a measure of the percentage of glycated hemoglobin in the blood and provides an indication of participant blood glucose control in the 2 to 3 months prior to the evaluation. (NCT01189890)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin33.5
Glimepiride46.6

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg-29.9
Sitagliptin 100 mg-5.85

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.03
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.66

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg-5.06
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.85

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.5
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.3

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg7.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg0.6

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 300 mg9.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg11.9

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 52

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 52 in each treatment group. The statistical analysis shows the treatment difference (ie, between canagliflozin and sitagliptin) in the percentage. (NCT01137812)
Timeframe: Week 52

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 300 mg47.6
Sitagliptin 100 mg35.3

Change in 2-hour Post-prandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-9.79
Canagliflozin 100 mg-47.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg-57.1
Sitagliptin 100 mg-49.3

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin2.47
Canagliflozin 100 mg-27.3
Canagliflozin 300 mg-37.8
Sitagliptin 100 mg-20.2

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-26.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-35.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg-17.7

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-0.17
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.79
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.94
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.82

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.73
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.88
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.73

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin1.52
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.84
Canagliflozin 300 mg-5.06
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.83

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.53
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.65
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.66

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin-1.2
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.2

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.2
Sitagliptin 100 mg-1.3

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin3.7
Canagliflozin 100 mg10.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg12.1
Sitagliptin 100 mg5.0

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg11.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg13.3
Sitagliptin 100 mg6.0

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo/Sitagliptin3.2
Canagliflozin 100 mg1.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.4
Sitagliptin 100 mg1.0

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 52

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 52 for each active treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus sitagliptin) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 52

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg1.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg2.7
Sitagliptin 100 mg-0.4

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences between each canagliflozin or sitagliptin group and placebo. (NCT01106677)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo/Sitagliptin29.8
Canagliflozin 100 mg45.5
Canagliflozin 300 mg57.8
Sitagliptin 100 mg54.5

Change in 2-hour Post-prandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-118
Canagliflozin 300 mg-126

Change in 2-hour Post-prandial Glucose From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in 2-hour post-prandial glucose from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo5.19
Canagliflozin 100 mg-42.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg-58.8

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-81.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-86.3

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo8.33
Canagliflozin 100 mg-27.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-35.0

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.13
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.56

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.14
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.77
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.03

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.47
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.97

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.38
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.34
Canagliflozin 300 mg-5.04

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.0
Canagliflozin 300 mg-3.8

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.6
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg-3.9

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg2.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg10.8

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.4
Canagliflozin 100 mg11.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg10.5

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the least-squares mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.6
Canagliflozin 300 mg-12.7

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.8
Canagliflozin 100 mg2.5
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.4

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26 (High Glycemic Substudy)

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the High Glycemic Substudy. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Canagliflozin 100 mg17.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg11.6

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26 (Main Study)

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01081834)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo20.6
Canagliflozin 100 mg44.5
Canagliflozin 300 mg62.4

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo4.11
Canagliflozin 100 mg-18.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg-30.5

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.13
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.85
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.06

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-2.65
Canagliflozin 100 mg-4.89
Canagliflozin 300 mg-4.27

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.7
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.1
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.6

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo3.2
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg6.5

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean percent change. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo11.6
Canagliflozin 100 mg5.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg8.5

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c<7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106625)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo18
Canagliflozin 100 mg43.2
Canagliflozin 300 mg56.6

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in FPG from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.39
Canagliflozin 100 mg-18.1
Canagliflozin 300 mg-20.3

Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in HbA1c from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.03
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.60
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.73

Change in Region Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

Region percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of (body fat + lean body mass + bone mass content). The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in region percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.00
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.03
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.18

Change in Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in SBP from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionmmHg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.10
Canagliflozin 100 mg-3.52
Canagliflozin 300 mg-6.79

Change in Tissue Percent Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

Tissue percent total fat = body fat as a percentage of body fat + lean body mass. The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in tissue percent total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.02
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.04
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.18

Change in Total Fat From Baseline to Week 26 in a Subset of Patients Undergoing Specific Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) Analysis for Body Composition

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean change in total fat from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group in patients randomized to the subset of patients undergoing specific DXA analysis for body composition. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.28
Canagliflozin 100 mg-1.87
Canagliflozin 300 mg-2.38

Percent Change in Body Weight From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in body weight from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.1
Canagliflozin 100 mg-2.4
Canagliflozin 300 mg-3.1

Percent Change in Distal Forearm Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in distal forearm BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.8

Percent Change in Femoral Neck Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in femoral neck BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-1.0
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg-0.6

Percent Change in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in HDL-C from Baseline to Week 26 or each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo1.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg6.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg6.2

Percent Change in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in lumbar spine BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg0.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg0.2

Percent Change in Total Hip Bone Mineral Density (BMD) From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change from Baseline to Week 26 in total hip BMD for each treatment group as assessed by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in LS mean percent change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo-0.5
Canagliflozin 100 mg-0.9
Canagliflozin 300 mg-1.0

Percent Change in Triglycerides From Baseline to Week 26

The table below shows the least-squares (LS) mean percent change in triglycerides from Baseline to Week 26 for each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the LS mean change. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Day 1 (Baseline) and Week 26

InterventionPercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Placebo7.7
Canagliflozin 100 mg2.8
Canagliflozin 300 mg8.4

Percentage of Patients With HbA1c <7% at Week 26

The table below shows the percentage of patients with HbA1c <7% at Week 26 in each treatment group. The statistical analyses show the treatment differences (ie, each canagliflozin group minus placebo) in the percentage. (NCT01106651)
Timeframe: Week 26

InterventionPercentage of patients (Number)
Placebo28.0
Canagliflozin 100 mg47.7
Canagliflozin 300 mg58.5

Change From Baseline in Body Weight at Week 30

Change in body weight following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., body weight at Week 30 minus body weight at baseline) (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin-0.83
Glimepiride0.90

Change From Baseline in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 30

Blood glucose was measured on a fasting basis (collected after an 8- to 10-hour fast). FPG is expressed as mg/dL. Blood was drawn at predose on Day 1 and after 30 weeks of treatment to determine change in plasma glucose levels (i.e., FPG at Week 30 minus FPG at baseline). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin-47.0
Glimepiride-23.5

Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin A1C (HbA1C) at Week 30

HbA1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over a prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). Change in A1C following 30 weeks of therapy (i.e., A1C at Week 30 minus A1C at baseline). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 30

InterventionPercent of total hemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Sitagliptin/Metformin-1.5
Glimepiride-0.7

Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Drug Due to an Adverse Event

An AE is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to 30 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Metformin8
Glimepiride8

Number of Participants Who Experienced at Least One Adverse Event (AE)

An adverse event (AE) is any unfavorable and unintended change in the structure, function or chemistry of the body temporally associated with study drug administration whether or not considered related to the use of the product. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to 32 weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Metformin88
Glimepiride101

Percentage of Participants With HbA1C < 7.0% at Week 30

HbA1C is blood marker used to report average blood glucose levels over a prolonged periods of time and is reported as a percentage (%). (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Week 30

InterventionPercentage of Participants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Metformin81.2
Glimepiride40.1

Percentage of Participants With One or More Episodes of Hypoglycemia

Symptomatic episodes assessed as likely to be due to hypoglycemia were reported by investigators as adverse experiences of hypoglycemia. Adverse experiences of hypoglycemia were based on all reports of hypoglycemia; a concurrent glucose measurement was not required. (NCT00993187)
Timeframe: Up to Week 30

InterventionPercentage of participants (Number)
Sitagliptin/Metformin5.5
Glimepiride20.1

Change in Body Weight at Week 104

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.70
Lira 1.2-1.89
Glimepiride0.95

Change in Body Weight at Week 156

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.43
Lira 1.2-1.68
Glimepiride1.05

Change in Body Weight at Week 52

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-2.45
Lira 1.2-2.05
Glimepiride1.12

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 104

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-15.82
Lira 1.2-9.36
Glimepiride1.97

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 156

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-12.06
Lira 1.2-5.45
Glimepiride4.57

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose at Week 52

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-25.57
Lira 1.2-15.21
Glimepiride-5.29

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.88
Lira 1.2-0.59
Glimepiride-0.28

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 156

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-0.71
Lira 1.2-0.44
Glimepiride-0.16

Change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) at Week 52

Percentage point change in Glycosylated Haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period) (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionpercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-1.14
Lira 1.2-0.84
Glimepiride-0.51

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.15
Lira 1.2-27.34
Glimepiride-24.85

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-34.83
Lira 1.2-25.68
Glimepiride-23.84

Change in Mean Postprandial Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean postprandial glucose (PPG) based on self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measurements of plasma glucose were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-37.4
Lira 1.2-30.8
Glimepiride-24.5

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of 52-week extension). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.76
Lira 1.2-8.28
Glimepiride-7.95

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 156

Change in mean prandial increments (incr.) of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 156 weeks. The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 156

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-11.01
Lira 1.2-7.53
Glimepiride-7.97

Change in Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 8-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 52

Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline (week 0) to 52 weeks (end of double-blind period). The 8 time points for self-measured 8-point plasma glucose profiles were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at bedtime, and at 3:00 AM ± 30 min. Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between post- and pre-meal values (for breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: week 0, week 52

Interventionmg/dL (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 1.8-9.6
Lira 1.2-8.4
Glimepiride-5.6

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of the 52-week extension). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride0533405
Lira 1.2068133
Lira 1.817187

Hypoglycaemic Episodes

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring from week 104 to end of trial (week 195). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 56 mg/dL. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 56 mg/dL. (NCT00294723)
Timeframe: weeks 104-195

,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Glimepiride1344
Lira 1.2031
Lira 1.80133

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 104

"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met64.48
Lira 1.2 + Met27.30
Lira 1.8 + Met17.81
Met Mono-7.89
Met + Glim11.25

Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26

"Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).~Beta-cell function: HOMA-B (%) = 20∙fasting insulin[uU/mL] divided by (FPG mmol/L]-3.5)." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionpercentage point (%point) (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met20.45
Lira 1.2 + Met20.33
Lira 1.8 + Met26.12
Met Mono-1.63
Met + Glim24.68

Change in Body Weight at Week 104

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-2.07
Lira 1.2 + Met-3.03
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.91
Met Mono-1.80
Met + Glim0.70

Change in Body Weight at Week 26

Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionkg (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.78
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.58
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.79
Met Mono-1.51
Met + Glim0.95

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 104

Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.80
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.20
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.18
Met Mono0.75
Met + Glim-0.64

Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26

Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.13
Lira 1.2 + Met-1.63
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.68
Met Mono0.40
Met + Glim-1.31

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104

Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionpercentage of total haemoglobin (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.36
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.56
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.58
Met Mono0.25
Met + Glim-0.50

Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26

Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation) (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

InterventionPercentage point of total HbA1c (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.69
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.97
Lira 1.8 + Met-1.00
Met Mono0.09
Met + Glim-0.98

Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.59
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.22
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.10
Met Mono-0.43
Met + Glim-1.80

Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26

Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-1.68
Lira 1.2 + Met-2.33
Lira 1.8 + Met-2.57
Met Mono-0.62
Met + Glim-2.46

Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104

"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 104

Interventionmmol/L (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.27
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.56
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.44
Met Mono-0.20
Met + Glim-0.29

Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26

"Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.~Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three." (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: week 0, week 26

Interventionmmol/l (Least Squares Mean)
Lira 0.6 + Met-0.23
Lira 1.2 + Met-0.40
Lira 1.8 + Met-0.56
Met Mono-0.44
Met + Glim-0.44

Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 104

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-104

,,,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
AllMajorMinorSymptoms only
Lira 0.6 + Met5202329
Lira 1.2 + Met5112624
Lira 1.8 + Met4902227
Met + Glim5240284240
Met Mono180612

Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 26

Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L. (NCT00318461)
Timeframe: weeks 0-26

,,,,
Interventionepisodes (Number)
MajorMinorSymptoms only
Lira 0.6 + Met01517
Lira 1.2 + Met037
Lira 1.8 + Met0922
Met + Glim0136175
Met Mono0610

Reviews

3 reviews available for glimepiride and Body Weight

ArticleYear
Optimizing outcomes for GLP-1 agonists.
    The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association, 2011, Volume: 111, Issue:2 Suppl 1

    Topics: Algorithms; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Glucagon-Like Peptide

2011
Glimepiride in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a review of the worldwide therapeutic experience.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2003, Volume: 25, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relat

2003
[Retrolective study design -- a new tool of evidence-based medicine].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2005, Jul-08, Volume: 130 Suppl 2

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Body Weight; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

2005

Trials

28 trials available for glimepiride and Body Weight

ArticleYear
Comparison of the effects of empagliflozin and glimepiride on endothelial function in patients with type 2 diabetes: A randomized controlled study.
    PloS one, 2022, Volume: 17, Issue:2

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Endothelium; Fema

2022
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Three-year data from 5 HARMONY phase 3 clinical trials of albiglutide in type 2 diabetes mellitus: Long-term efficacy with or without rescue therapy.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2017, Volume: 131

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Glucagon-L

2017
Comparative effect of saxagliptin and glimepiride with a composite endpoint of adequate glycaemic control without hypoglycaemia and without weight gain in patients uncontrolled with metformin therapy: Results from the SPECIFY study, a 48-week, multi-centr
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2019, Volume: 21, Issue:4

    Topics: Adamantane; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptides; Female;

2019
Efficacy and safety of dulaglutide monotherapy compared with glimepiride in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes: Post-hoc analyses of a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.
    Journal of diabetes investigation, 2020, Volume: 11, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Asian People; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind

2020
[Effect of dapagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes who have inadequate glycaemic control with glimepiride].
    Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2013, Volume: 138 Suppl 1

    Topics: Aged; Benzhydryl Compounds; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Me

2013
HARMONY 3: 104-week randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled trial assessing the efficacy and safety of albiglutide compared with placebo, sitagliptin, and glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes taking metformin.
    Diabetes care, 2014, Volume: 37, Issue:8

    Topics: Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female

2014
Canagliflozin provides durable glycemic improvements and body weight reduction over 104 weeks versus glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes on metformin: a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 study.
    Diabetes care, 2015, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Ther

2015
Efficacy and Tolerability of Sitagliptin Compared with Glimepiride in Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Inadequate Glycemic Control: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial.
    Drugs & aging, 2015, Volume: 32, Issue:6

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet; D

2015
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from Latin America.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2016, Volume: 32, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; D

2016
Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin/metformin fixed-dose combination compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: A multicenter randomized double-blind study.
    Journal of diabetes, 2017, Volume: 9, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diarrhea; Double-Blind Method; Drug Th

2017
Fifty-two-week efficacy and safety of vildagliptin vs. glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled on metformin monotherapy.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:2

    Topics: Adamantane; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Adminis

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2009, Volume: 11, Issue:12

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparatio

2009
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2010, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema

2010
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2010, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema

2010
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2010, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema

2010
Effects of one year treatment of vildagliptin added to pioglitazone or glimepiride in poorly controlled type 2 diabetic patients.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2010, Volume: 42, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Combination; Fema

2010
Vildagliptin add-on to metformin produces similar efficacy and reduced hypoglycaemic risk compared with glimepiride, with no weight gain: results from a 2-year study.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:9

    Topics: Adamantane; Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Dr

2010
Liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide 1 analogue, provides sustained improvements in glycaemic control and weight for 2 years as monotherapy compared with glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2011, Volume: 13, Issue:4

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Female; Glucagon-Like Pe

2011
Exenatide or glimepiride added to metformin on metabolic control and on insulin resistance in type 2 diabetic patients.
    European journal of pharmacology, 2011, Volume: 666, Issue:1-3

    Topics: Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Femal

2011
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2012
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2012
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2012
Effect of the once-daily human GLP-1 analogue liraglutide on appetite, energy intake, energy expenditure and gastric emptying in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2012, Volume: 97, Issue:2

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Appetite; Australia; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2012
Comparing the efficacy and safety profile of sitagliptin versus glimepiride in patients of type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with metformin alone.
    The Journal of the Association of Physicians of India, 2012, Volume: 60

    Topics: Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Peptidase IV Inhibitors; Dose-Response Relationsh

2012
Efficacy and safety of glimepiride as initial treatment in Chinese patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Current medical research and opinion, 2013, Volume: 29, Issue:3

    Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; China; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Glyca

2013
Effects of glimepiride on HbA(1c) and body weight in Type 2 diabetes: results of a 1.5-year follow-up study.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2003, Volume: 61, Issue:1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fol

2003
Change in patients' body weight after 12 months of treatment with glimepiride or glibenclamide in Type 2 diabetes: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.
    Diabetologia, 2003, Volume: 46, Issue:12

    Topics: Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Cholesterol; Cohort Studies; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2003
Results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study administering glimepiride to patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus inadequately controlled with rosiglitazone monotherapy.
    Clinical therapeutics, 2004, Volume: 26, Issue:11

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination;

2004
Comparative efficacy of glimepiride and/or metformin with insulin in type 2 diabetes.
    Diabetes research and clinical practice, 2006, Volume: 72, Issue:3

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

2006
Once-daily insulin glargine administration in the morning compared to bedtime in combination with morning glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes: an assessment of treatment flexibility.
    Hormone and metabolic research = Hormon- und Stoffwechselforschung = Hormones et metabolisme, 2006, Volume: 38, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Blood Glucose; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type

2006
Starting insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: twice-daily biphasic insulin Aspart 30 plus metformin versus once-daily insulin glargine plus glimepiride.
    Experimental and clinical endocrinology & diabetes : official journal, German Society of Endocrinology [and] German Diabetes Association, 2006, Volume: 114, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Biphasic Insulins; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relati

2006
Effects of vildagliptin on glucose control in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with a sulphonylurea.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2008, Volume: 10, Issue:11

    Topics: Adamantane; Aged; Biomarkers; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dipeptidyl-Pept

2008
Predictors of response to glimepiride in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
    Diabetes & metabolism, 2001, Volume: 27, Issue:5 Pt 1

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Apolipoproteins; Blood Glucose; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2;

2001
Vascular effects of glibenclamide vs. glimepiride and metformin in Type 2 diabetic patients.
    Diabetic medicine : a journal of the British Diabetic Association, 2002, Volume: 19, Issue:2

    Topics: Acetylcholine; Adult; Aged; Blood Flow Velocity; Blood Pressure; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; C-Pep

2002

Other Studies

12 other studies available for glimepiride and Body Weight

ArticleYear
Short-term combined treatment with exenatide and metformin is superior to glimepiride combined metformin in improvement of serum testosterone levels in type 2 diabetic patients with obesity.
    Andrologia, 2018, Volume: 50, Issue:7

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Obesity Agents; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drug Therapy, Com

2018
Add-On Treatment with Liraglutide Improves Glycemic Control in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes on Metformin Therapy.
    Diabetes technology & therapeutics, 2015, Volume: 17, Issue:7

    Topics: Aged; Blood Glucose; Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring; Blood Pressure; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus,

2015
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Effects of canagliflozin on body weight and body composition in patients with type 2 diabetes over 104 weeks.
    Postgraduate medicine, 2016, Volume: 128, Issue:4

    Topics: Adiposity; Aged; Body Composition; Body Mass Index; Body Weight; Canagliflozin; Clinical Trials, Pha

2016
Oral glyburide, but not glimepiride, blocks the infarct-size limiting effects of pioglitazone.
    Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 2008, Volume: 22, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Animals; Body Weight; Coronary Vessels; Data Interpretation, Statistical; Deca

2008
Anti-hyperglycemic effects and mechanism of Bidens pilosa water extract.
    Journal of ethnopharmacology, 2009, Mar-18, Volume: 122, Issue:2

    Topics: Animals; Bidens; Blood Glucose; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Drugs, Chinese Herbal;

2009
Treatment with glimepiride, but not mitiglinide and short-acting insulin, resists body weight and abdominal fat reduction under dietary energy restriction.
    Journal of atherosclerosis and thrombosis, 2009, Volume: 16, Issue:1

    Topics: Abdominal Fat; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diet, Reducing; Female; Humans; Insulin; Isoi

2009
Changes in body composition after 9 months of treatment with exenatide twice daily versus glimepiride: comment letter on Jendle et al.
    Diabetes, obesity & metabolism, 2010, Volume: 12, Issue:12

    Topics: Body Composition; Body Weight; Delayed-Action Preparations; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Exenatide; Hu

2010
Reduced cell proliferation and neuroblast differentiation in the dentate gyrus of high fat diet-fed mice are ameliorated by metformin and glimepiride treatment.
    Neurochemical research, 2011, Volume: 36, Issue:12

    Topics: Animals; Body Weight; Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor; Cell Differentiation; Cell Proliferation; D

2011
Effect of piperine on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of glimepiride in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats.
    Natural product communications, 2012, Volume: 7, Issue:10

    Topics: Alanine Transaminase; Alkaloids; Animals; Antioxidants; Area Under Curve; Aspartate Aminotransferase

2012
The influence of glimepiride on the oxidative state of rats with streptozotocin-induced hyperglycemia.
    Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2003, Volume: 9, Issue:11

    Topics: Animals; Antioxidants; Body Weight; Glutathione; Hyperglycemia; Hypoglycemic Agents; Male; Malondial

2003
[Hardly any hypoglycemias, constant weight--and still cost effective].
    MMW Fortschritte der Medizin, 2005, Nov-24, Volume: 147, Issue:47

    Topics: Body Weight; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Drugs, Generic; Glyburide; Humans; Hy

2005
The effects of nicotinamide and glimepiride on diabetes prevention in BB rats.
    Life sciences, 1995, Volume: 57, Issue:16

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Age Factors; Animals; Body Weight; Diabetes Mellitus, Experimental; Hypoglycem

1995