gemifloxacin has been researched along with Streptococcal-Infections* in 2 studies
2 other study(ies) available for gemifloxacin and Streptococcal-Infections
Article | Year |
---|---|
Prevalence and clonal characterization of Streptococcus pyogenes clinical isolates with reduced fluoroquinolone susceptibility in Spain.
The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence and characteristics of non-fluoroquinolone (FQ)-susceptible Streptococcus pyogenes isolates and to study their mechanisms of resistance. We performed a prospective prevalence study with 468 isolates collected from 2005 to 2007 and a retrospective study that was based on the examination of existing data collected from 1999 to 2008. The retrospective study included data for isolates with high-level resistance (HR) to ciprofloxacin (MIC >or= 32 microg/ml) (HR isolates) and isolates with the same emm types as those reported in the literature with low-level resistance (LR) to ciprofloxacin (MICs, 2 to 8 microg/ml) (LR isolates, n = 205). Genetic characterization of the isolates was performed by means of emm typing and multilocus sequence typing. The prevalence of LR ranged from 1.9% in 2005 to 30.8% in 2007. This increase was mainly due to the circulation of an emm6 subtype (emm6.4) that represented 77.1% of the LR isolates in 2007. Notably, another emm6 subtype, also detected in 2007 (emm6.37), showed coresistance to 14- and 15-membered macrolides mediated by the mefA gene. Only three HR isolates were detected (isolates emm68.1/ST247/T3,13,B3264, emm77/ST399/T28, and emm28/ST52/T28), and all were identified in the retrospective study. Overall, the 673 isolates represented 25 emm types. All LR isolates were clustered into two emm types: emm6 (six emm6 subtypes) and emm75. All the 156 emm6 isolates had LR, harbored the Ser79/Ala mutation in the parC gene product, and had the same sequence type (ST), ST382. Most (21/33) of the emm75 isolates had LR, showed the Ser79/Phe plus Asp91/Asn double mutation in the parC gene product, and were ST150. The Asp91/Asn mutation by itself did not confer resistance to FQs. Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Child; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Genes, Bacterial; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Prospective Studies; Spain; Streptococcal Infections; Streptococcus pyogenes | 2010 |
Comparative efficacy of gemifloxacin in experimental models of pyelonephritis and wound infection.
Gemifloxacin (SB-265805) is a potent, novel fluoroquinolone with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. In this study, the efficacy of gemifloxacin was studied in experimental models of Gram-negative pyelonephritis (caused by Escherichia coli or Proteus mirabilis) and Gram-positive wound infection resulting from Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus. Gemifloxacin activity against these pathogens was compared with those of amoxycillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime, azithromycin, trovafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin and tosufloxacin. Oral treatment was initiated 1 h after infection and continued once or twice daily for 3 days. Around 17 h after the end of treatment, animals were killed and the infected kidneys or the skin around the wound site were excised for the enumeration of viable bacteria. In the pyelonephritis model (either microorganism), gemifloxacin reduced bacterial numbers significantly (P < 0.01) compared with no treatment. No comparator agent had a greater effect than gemifloxacin. Notably, grepafloxacin and azithromycin were significantly less effective (P < 0.01) than gemifloxacin against E. coli pyelonephritis, and amoxycillin-clavulanate, azithromycin and trovafloxacin were inferior (P < 0.01) against P. mirabilis infection. In the S. pyogenes wound infection model, gemifloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime and azithromycin reduced bacterial numbers significantly compared with controls (P < 0.01). Results for the comparator quinolones were not significantly different from untreated controls (P > 0.05). Gemifloxacin was also effective against staphylococcal infection, as were grepafloxacin and levofloxacin, while ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin and tosufloxacin were significantly less effective against these pathogens than gemifloxacin (P < 0.01). No comparator agent had greater activity than gemifloxacin against S. pyogenes or S. aureus infections. These data demonstrate the potential benefit of gemifloxacin in the treatment of Gram-negative urinary tract infection and Gram-positive skin and soft tissue infection. Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacterial Infections; Escherichia coli Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Male; Naphthyridines; Proteus Infections; Pyelonephritis; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Staphylococcal Infections; Streptococcal Infections; Wound Infection | 2000 |