gemifloxacin and Escherichia-coli-Infections

A simple and efficient synthesis of 6-fluoro-4-oxopyrido[2,3-a]carbazole-3-carboxylic acids (13a-e) and a structurally related 6-fluoro-4-oxothieno[2',3':4,5]pyrrolo[3,2-h]quinoline (13f) was achieved via Stille arylation of 7-chloro-6-fluoro-8-nitro-4-oxoquinoline-3-carboxylate and a subsequent microwave-assisted phosphite-mediated Cadogan reaction. The new compounds were tested for their in vitro antimicrobial and antiproliferative activity. The ability of 13a-f to inhibit the activity of DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV was also investigated. The thieno isostere (13f) emerged as the most active antibacterial, while the 9-fluoro derivative (13e) was the most potent against multidrug-resistant staphylococci. Compounds 13a, 13c-f displayed growth inhibition against MCF-7 breast tumor and A549 non-small cell lung cancer cells coupled with an absence of cytotoxicity toward normal human-derm fibroblasts (HuDe). Compound 13e was the most active anticancer against MCF-7 cells, with greater potency than ellipticine (IC(50) 0.8 and 1.6muM, respectively). The most active compounds in this series show promise as dual acting anticancer and antibacterial chemotherapeutics.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cell Death; Cell Line; Cell Line, Tumor; DNA Gyrase; DNA Topoisomerase IV; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Topoisomerase II Inhibitors

Gemifloxacin (SB-265805) is a potent, novel fluoroquinolone with broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity. In this study, the efficacy of gemifloxacin was studied in experimental models of Gram-negative pyelonephritis (caused by Escherichia coli or Proteus mirabilis) and Gram-positive wound infection resulting from Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis or Staphylococcus aureus. Gemifloxacin activity against these pathogens was compared with those of amoxycillin-clavulanate, ciprofloxacin, cefuroxime, azithromycin, trovafloxacin, grepafloxacin, levofloxacin and tosufloxacin. Oral treatment was initiated 1 h after infection and continued once or twice daily for 3 days. Around 17 h after the end of treatment, animals were killed and the infected kidneys or the skin around the wound site were excised for the enumeration of viable bacteria. In the pyelonephritis model (either microorganism), gemifloxacin reduced bacterial numbers significantly (P < 0.01) compared with no treatment. No comparator agent had a greater effect than gemifloxacin. Notably, grepafloxacin and azithromycin were significantly less effective (P < 0.01) than gemifloxacin against E. coli pyelonephritis, and amoxycillin-clavulanate, azithromycin and trovafloxacin were inferior (P < 0.01) against P. mirabilis infection. In the S. pyogenes wound infection model, gemifloxacin, amoxycillin-clavulanate, cefuroxime and azithromycin reduced bacterial numbers significantly compared with controls (P < 0.01). Results for the comparator quinolones were not significantly different from untreated controls (P > 0.05). Gemifloxacin was also effective against staphylococcal infection, as were grepafloxacin and levofloxacin, while ciprofloxacin, trovafloxacin and tosufloxacin were significantly less effective against these pathogens than gemifloxacin (P < 0.01). No comparator agent had greater activity than gemifloxacin against S. pyogenes or S. aureus infections. These data demonstrate the potential benefit of gemifloxacin in the treatment of Gram-negative urinary tract infection and Gram-positive skin and soft tissue infection.

Topics: Animals; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacterial Infections; Escherichia coli Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Male; Naphthyridines; Proteus Infections; Pyelonephritis; Rats; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Staphylococcal Infections; Streptococcal Infections; Wound Infection

To compare the antimicrobial effects (AMEs) of gemifloxacin (GEM) and ciprofloxacin (CIP) on Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a series of pharmacokinetic profiles of GEM (a single dose with the half-life (T(1/2)) of 7.4 h and CIP (two 12 h doses with T(1/2) of 4 h) were simulated in vitro over eight-fold ranges of the AUC/MIC ratio. Species- and strain-independent linear relationships observed between the intensity of AME (I(E)) and log AUC/MIC were not superimposed for GEM and CIP (r(2)=0.99 and 0.98, respectively). The predicted ratio for GEM that might be equivalent to a clinically established breakpoint value of AUC/MIC=125 (mg h/l)/(mg/l) for CIP was estimated at 110 (mg h/l)/(mg/l). It was calculated, that a daily dose of CIP that might provide the same AME as a clinical dose of GEM (320 mg) on a hypothetical strain of S. aureus with MICs=MIC(50)s would be as high as 2 x 3200 mg.

Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Area Under Curve; Ciprofloxacin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Escherichia coli; Escherichia coli Infections; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Models, Biological; Naphthyridines; Predictive Value of Tests; Staphylococcal Infections; Staphylococcus aureus