gemifloxacin has been researched along with Chronic-Disease* in 8 studies
8 trial(s) available for gemifloxacin and Chronic-Disease
Article | Year |
---|---|
A randomized, double-blind study comparing 5 days oral gemifloxacin with 7 days oral levofloxacin in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
To demonstrate that 5 days of treatment with a new fluoroquinolone, gemifloxacin, is at least as effective as 7 days of treatment with levofloxacin in adult patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB).. Randomized, double-blind, double dummy, multicentre, parallel group study. Sixty different medical centers in US, UK and Germany.. A total of 360 adults (>40 years of age) with AECB were randomly assigned to receive gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days or levofloxacin 500mg once daily for 7 days. The primary efficacy parameter was a clinical response at follow-up (Days 14-21).. In total, 335/360 patients completed the study (93.1%). Seven patients receiving gemifloxacin withdrew from the study compared to 18 patients receiving levofloxacin; this difference was statistically significant (Fisher's exact test: p=0.02). In the intent-to-treat (ITT) population, the clinical success rate at follow-up (Days 14-21) was 85.2% (155/182) with gemifloxacin and 78.1% (139/178) with levofloxacin. Clinical success rate in the per-protocol (PP) population was 88.2% (134/152) with gemifloxacin and 85.1% (126/148) with levofloxacin. At long-term follow-up (Days 28-35), the clinical success rates in the PP population were 83.7% (123/147) with gemifloxacin and 78.4% (109/139) with levofloxacin. The difference in success rates was 5.26% (95% CI: -3.83, 14.34).. The clinical efficacy of gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days in AECB was at least as good as levofloxacin 500 mg once daily for 7 days. Fewer withdrawals and superior clinical efficacy at long-term follow-up were also seen with gemifloxacin. Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Levofloxacin; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Ofloxacin; Treatment Outcome | 2004 |
Time course of recovery of health status following an infective exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.
The magnitude and time course of effect of an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) on health status are not known. Data from the GLOBE study, a randomised double blind trial of antibiotic therapy, were used to investigate these effects.. 438 patients with AECB received either gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days (214 patients) or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days (224 patients) and were followed up for 26 weeks. St George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) scores were obtained at baseline and after 4, 12, and 26 weeks.. At presentation during an exacerbation SGRQ scores were worse (Total score difference 5.4 units, 95% CI 1.9 to 8.8, p=0.002) in patients who had a subsequent exacerbation during follow up. The greatest improvement in SGRQ score occurred within the first 4 weeks (mean 8.9 units, 95% CI 6.5 to 11.5, p<0.0001). Subsequently, scores improved more rapidly in patients with no further exacerbations. At 26 weeks the difference between the two groups was 9.6 units (95% CI 5.7 to 13.4, p<0.0001). In patients with no further exacerbations the SGRQ score improved between 4 and 12 weeks by a further 4.1 units (95% CI 2.2 to 5.9, p<0.0001).. A single infective AECB has a sustained effect on health status. The recovery period is long even in patients who have no further exacerbations. A second episode within 6 months limits recovery markedly. Treatments that reduce exacerbation frequency could have a significant impact on health status. Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Area Under Curve; Bacterial Infections; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Health Status; Humans; Macrolides; Male; Naphthyridines; Smoking; Treatment Outcome | 2003 |
Cost-effectiveness of gemifloxacin: results from the GLOBE study.
The cost-effectiveness of treatment with oral gemifloxacin versus oral clarithromycin for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB) was evaluated. Economic outcomes were assessed for the Gemifloxacin Long-term Outcomes in Bronchitis Exacerbations study. This prospective double-blind, controlled, health outcomes study compared health, economic, and clinical outcomes after randomized treatment with either oral gemifloxacin or oral clarithromycin for AECB. Base case analysis was performed from the third-party payer's perspective and considered the costs of respiratory tract infection-related medical care. Analysis from the societal perspective also included costs of lost productivity. Treatment effectiveness was measured as the proportion of patients without recurrence requiring antimicrobial treatment following resolution of the initial AECB. Data sources included the outcomes study itself and standard U.S. cost sources. Compared with clarithromycin, gemifloxacin treatment resulted in significantly more patients without AECB recurrence requiring antimicrobial treatment after 26 weeks (73.8% versus 63.8%, p = 0.024). Fewer patients receiving gemifloxacin were hospitalized (5 of 214 patients versus 14 of 224 patients, p = 0.059), and they had less time off from usual activities (8.3 days versus 10.1 days). The mean direct cost per patient receiving gemifloxacin was $127 less than with clarithromycin ($247 versus $374, respectively); mean total costs (direct plus indirect) per patient were $329 less for patients receiving gemifloxacin ($1413 versus $1742). Gemifloxacin dominated clarithromycin in cost-effectiveness analysis. Bootstrap analysis indicated that the probability of gemifloxacin being both cost saving and more effective than clarithromycin is 88% from a payer's perspective and 84% from the societal perspective. Gemifloxacin was more cost-effective, improving AECB outcomes and producing substantial cost offsets compared with clarithromycin. Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Clarithromycin; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Naphthyridines; Prospective Studies; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Treatment Outcome | 2002 |
A comparison of gemifloxacin and clarithromycin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis and long-term clinical outcomes.
Gemifloxacin is an enhanced-affinity quinolone with potent activity against lower respiratory tract pathogens.. The efficacy and safety of a 5-day course of gemifloxacin were compared with those of a standard 7-day regimen of clarithromycin in patients with an acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB). The impact of treatment on the long-term (26 weeks) clinical outcome was also assessed.. The acute phase of this randomized, double-blind study was performed in 93 centers in 7 countries. Adult patients (age >40 years) with a history of chronic bronchitis and an Anthonisen type 1 acute exacerbation (increased dyspnea, cough, and sputum purulence) were eligible. Patients receiving systemic steroids at a dose of >10 mg prednisone or the equivalent were excluded. Patients were randomized to receive gemifloxacin 320 mg once daily for 5 days or clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily for 7 days. Clinical and bacteriologic response rates were assessed at the end-of-therapy visit (days 8-12), the week 2-3 follow-up visit (days 13-24), and the week 4-5 follow-up visit (days 25-38). The long-term phase (26 weeks), which included US and Canadian participants only, evaluated the proportion of patients who remained free of a recurrence of AECB requiring additional antimicrobial therapy after resolution of the initial episode.. Seven hundred twelve patients were randomized to treatment, 351 to gemifloxacin and 361 to clarithromycin. The long-term study included 438 patients, 214 receiving gemifloxacin and 224 receiving clarithromycin. Clinical success rates at the 2-3 week follow-up visit were 85.4% for gemifloxacin and 84.6% for clarithromycin. Bacteriologic success rates were 86.7% for gemifloxacin and 73.1% for clarithromycin. Significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin than clarithromycin remained free of AECB recurrences (71.0% vs 58.5%, respectively; P = 0.016). Both treatments were well tolerated.. In the acute treatment of Anthonisen type 1 AECB, a 5-day course of gemifloxacin was at least as effective as a 7-day regimen of clarithromycin. In this population, significantly more patients receiving gemifloxacin remained free of AECB recurrence after 26 weeks compared with those receiving clarithromycin. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Clarithromycin; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Recurrence; Sputum; Treatment Outcome | 2002 |
Comparison of chest X-ray findings and other parameters in acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis in Japan and the West.
One of the issues concerning harmonization in the development of pharmaceutical products, especially antimicrobials, is discrepancy in the indications to be studied clinically. In particular, it has been very much questioned whether the underlying disease in Western patients diagnosed with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB) is identical with chronic bronchitis in Japan. We assessed chest X-ray films from 105 AECB patients enrolled in a clinical study of SB265805 (a fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent under development) conducted in Europe, and then compared their clinical signs/symptoms and laboratory data with Japanese historical data. Five of the 105 patients did not meet the criteria of AECB; i.e., 2 of them were diagnosed with pneumonia, 1 with bronchiectasis, 1 with pneumoconiosis, and 1 with bronchiectasis plus pulmonary emphysema. In the remaining 100 patients, chest X-ray findings and laboratory test results were consistent with the concept of chronic bronchitis, although 23 of them had other cardiac or pulmonary diseases as well. There were significant imbalances in distribution between Western patients and Japanese historical data in terms of age, cough, WBC counts, and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Compared with Japanese historical data, Western patients were younger and had a more severe cough, although increases in WBC and CRP were less remarkable. For other variables, i.e., sex, fever, and volume of sputum, no significant difference was detected in distribution. Overall, there was no significant difference between the two groups in regard to disease severity, as assessed by fever, WBC, and CRP. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; C-Reactive Protein; Chronic Disease; Comorbidity; Cough; Diagnosis, Differential; Europe; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Heart Diseases; Humans; Japan; Leukocyte Count; Lung Diseases; Lung Diseases, Obstructive; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Radiography; Severity of Illness Index | 2001 |
Efficacy of gemifloxacin in acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a randomised, double-blind comparison with trovafloxacin.
This randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, multinational study compared the efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin with trovafloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. There were 617 patients randomised: 303 to gemifloxacin and 314 to trovafloxacin. Clinical success rates at follow-up (clinical per-protocol population) were 91.5% for gemifloxacin and 87.6% for trovafloxacin. For the intent-to-treat population, the clinical efficacy of gemifloxacin was statistically significantly superior to that of trovafloxacin. In general, the in vitro activity of gemifloxacin against the major respiratory bacterial pathogens was superior to that of other antibiotics tested. Per-patient bacteriological success rates at follow-up (bacteriology per-protocol population) were 86.8% for gemifloxacin and 82.4% for trovafloxacin. Both agents were well tolerated. The clinical and bacteriological efficacy of a once-daily 5-day course of gemifloxacin is at least as good as that of a similar regimen of trovafloxacin in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis, Chronic; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Follow-Up Studies; Gemifloxacin; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome | 2001 |
Efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin 320 mg once-daily for 7 days in the treatment of adult lower respiratory tract infections.
An open-label, non-comparative study assessed the clinical and bacteriological efficacy of gemifloxacin (320 mg, once-daily for 7 days) in lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI). Patients with acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis (AECB, n=261) or community-acquired pneumonia (CAP, n=216) were enrolled into the study. Clinical success rates at follow-up (days 21-28) in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population were high, 83.1% in AECB patients (95% CI: 77.9, 87.4) and 82.9% in CAP patients (95% CI: 77.0, 87.5). High bacteriological success rates were achieved (bacteriological ITT population), 91.2% (52/57) in AECB patients (95% CI: 80.0, 96.7) and 77.9% (60/77) in CAP patients (95% CI: 66.8, 86.3). Gemifloxacin was well tolerated with a low incidence of adverse events. Gemifloxacin treatment resulted in high clinical and bacteriological success rates and is a well-tolerated therapy for the treatment of LRTIs. Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Community-Acquired Infections; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Haemophilus Infections; Humans; Klebsiella Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Naphthyridines; Pneumococcal Infections; Pneumonia, Bacterial; Staphylococcal Infections; Treatment Failure | 2001 |
Gemifloxacin versus amoxicillin/clavulanate in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. The 070 Clinical Study group.
Six hundred patients were evaluated in this randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, multicenter, parallel-group study comparing the efficacy and safety of gemifloxacin (320 mg once-daily for 5 days) and amoxicillin/clavulanate (500/125 mg three-times daily for 7 days) for the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis (AECB). Of note, more than 90% of study participants had stage 2 disease at study entry. The two drugs were found to be equally effective, with clinical success rates of 93.6% for gemifloxacin and 93.2% on amoxicillin/clavulanate (95% CI -3.9 to 4.6). Bacteriological success rates favored gemifloxacin (90.9% compared with 79.5% for amoxicillin/clavulanate; 95% CI -3.3 to 26.0); however, this difference was not statistically significant. Gemifloxacin and amoxicillin/clavulanate were both well tolerated. In summary, gemifloxacin was found to be well tolerated and effective for the treatment of AECB, suggesting it is well suited for empirical treatment of this common respiratory condition in the current clinical environment. Topics: Acute-Phase Reaction; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Amoxicillin; Anti-Infective Agents; Bronchitis; Chronic Disease; Clavulanic Acid; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluoroquinolones; Gemifloxacin; Haemophilus influenzae; Humans; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Moraxella catarrhalis; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Naphthyridines; Streptococcus pneumoniae; Treatment Outcome | 2000 |