gemeprost has been researched along with Uterine-Perforation* in 2 studies
1 review(s) available for gemeprost and Uterine-Perforation
Article | Year |
---|---|
Pregnancy termination: techniques, risks, and complications and their management.
This article outlines the current modalities of pregnancy termination, as well as their risks and complications, in 3 phases of pregnancy: 1) up to 49 days past the last menstrual period, 2) 8-15 weeks, and 3) 16-24 weeks. Before 8 weeks of pregnancy, suction dilatation and curettage (D and C) is the preferred method. However, a medical approach, possibly self-administered, is viewed as more satisfactory and requires only an improvement in side effects. From 8-15 weeks' gestation, suction D and C and dilatation and evacuation (D and E) are the methods of choice. The use of laminaria tents improves both the facility and safety of these procedures in nulliparous patients and perhaps in multiparous patients. Priming of the cervix with prostaglandin could further decrease the difficulty and risks of these procedures. The use of a hydrogel compound is especially worthy of consideration. There is controversy about the preferred method between 16-20 weeks' gestation. D and E appears to have fewer complications and to be more cost-effective than hypertonic saline injection. Urea-prostaglandin has fewer and less severe complications than saline injection, and seems to be more cost-effective than saline injection in terms of duration of hospitalization. The high frequency of failure and side effects, combined with the possibility of expulsion of a live fetus, make prostaglandin-only injection less desirable. After 20 weeks' gestation, urea-prostaglandin injection is probably the safer method. Given the rapid increase in complications with passing weeks, any delay in providing late abortion services should be avoided. 2nd trimester pregnancy terminations, especially those after 18 weeks' gestation, are associated with increased mortality and morbidity and should be performed at specialized centers where providers are better equipped to manage complications. Topics: 16,16-Dimethylprostaglandin E2; Abortifacient Agents; Abortion, Induced; Alprostadil; Amnion; Anesthesia; Animals; Arbaprostil; Bacterial Infections; Carboprost; Cervix Uteri; Dilatation and Curettage; Dinoprost; Dinoprostone; Female; Humans; Hypertonic Solutions; Oxytocin; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Pregnancy Trimester, Second; Progestins; Prostaglandins E; Prostaglandins E, Synthetic; Prostaglandins F; Pulmonary Embolism; Risk; Saline Solution, Hypertonic; Time Factors; Urea; Uterine Hemorrhage; Uterine Perforation | 1986 |
1 other study(ies) available for gemeprost and Uterine-Perforation
Article | Year |
---|---|
A retrospective comparison between lamicel and gemeprost for cervical ripening before surgical interruption of first-trimester pregnancy.
To study the effect and complication rate of lamicel versus gemeprost as pretreatment to vacuum aspiration for the interruption of early pregnancy, the files of 622 medical records of women having a first-trimester abortion at Söder Hospital were studied retrospectively. Group A consisted of 317 women treated with lamicel in 1995 and Group B of 305 women treated with gemeprost in 1996. Complications were more common in Group A than in Group B (55 vs. 22; p < 0.05). Re-admission took place more often in Group A (25) than in Group B (6) (p < 0.05). The complications were more severe in Group A than in Group B. Using multivariate logistic regression analysis, the only impact factor for having a complication was the use of product for cervical priming. Gemeprost for preoperative treatment was found to render a fairly low rate of complications in this study, while complication rate was higher after treatment with lamicel. Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adult; Alprostadil; Cervical Ripening; Female; Humans; Infections; Magnesium Sulfate; Polyvinyl Alcohol; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Trimester, First; Premedication; Reoperation; Retrospective Studies; Sweden; Uterine Perforation | 2003 |