gdc-0973 and Skin-Neoplasms

The treatment of metastatic melanoma has been revolutionized by the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibition. Nevertheless, almost half of patients will progress or show primary resistance to treatment. The combination of BRAF/MEK and immune checkpoint inhibition might achieve higher response rates and improve long-term disease control. The IMspire150 trial investigated the combination of atezolizumab, cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus cobimetinib and vemurafenib alone.. This review covers the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab, cobimetinib and vemurafenib for patients with advanced or metastatic BRAF mutant melanoma. The combination is compared with the current standard of care including BRAF/MEK inhibition and treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors.. Atezolizumab plus cobimetinib and vemurafenib showed superior progression-free survival in metastatic melanoma compared to cobimetinib and vemurafenib alone. Triplet therapy might be an option in situations of urgent need for disease control, when oncologists choose BRAF/MEK inhibition over immune checkpoint inhibition as first line treatment. At this time results are not mature yet, and longer follow-up including overall survival data is needed. The future role of this combination will also be determined by a comparison with the combination of ipilimumab and nivolumab.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

The combination of vemurafenib, a proto-oncogene B-Raf inhibitor (BRAFi) and cobimetinib, an inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEKi) has shown to improve survival in patients with BRAF V600-mutated melanoma. BRAF mutations are also frequently detected driver mutations in other tumor types, including thyroid carcinoma. Since thyroid carcinoma is not a labeled indication for BRAF/MEKi, a cohort for patients with BRAF V600-mutated thyroid carcinoma was opened within the Drug Rediscovery Protocol (DRUP), a national ongoing pan-cancer multi-drug trial, in which patients receive off-label treatment with approved drugs based on their molecular tumor profile.. Here, we present two patients with BRAF-mutated thyroid carcinoma, who were successfully treated with vemurafenib/cobimetinib administered via a feeding tube. Plasma concentrations of vemurafenib and cobimetinib were determined. A partial response was observed in both patients, but they experienced significant toxicity.. Our cases show that vemurafenib/cobimetinib treatment is effective in BRAF V600-mutated thyroid carcinoma, also when administered via a feeding tube. Although serious side effects occurred in both patients, we hypothesize that this was not attributable to the administration route. Therefore, administration of vemurafenib/cobimetinib by feeding tube is feasible and effective.. Clinical trial identification: NCT02925234.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Humans; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Thyroid Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

We sought to identify patient subgroups with distinct postprogression overall survival (ppOS) outcomes and investigate the impact of original treatment assignment and initial postprogression treatment (ppRx) on ppOS.. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to model relationships between prespecified covariates and ppOS in patients with BRAF. RPA identified baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), baseline disease stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status at PD, and ppRx as significant prognostic factors for ppOS. Median ppOS was longest in patients with normal baseline LDH, stage M1c disease at baseline, and ppRx with immunotherapy or targeted therapy (12.2 months; 95% CI 10.3-16.1) and shortest in those with elevated baseline LDH > 2 × upper limit of normal (2.3 months; 95% CI 1.8-2.7). Original treatment assignment did not impact ppOS. Across treatment cohorts, patients treated with immunotherapy or targeted therapy after PD had better ppOS than those given other treatments.. A combination of factors at baseline (LDH, disease stage) and PD (performance status, ppRx) impact ppOS outcomes. ppRx with immunotherapy or targeted therapy is an independent prognostic factor for improved overall survival following progression regardless of original treatment. Trial registration The trials included in this analysis are registered with ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00949702 (BRIM-2), NCT01006980 (BRIM-3), NCT01271803 (BRIM-7), and NCT01689519 (coBRIM).

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Dacarbazine; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Piperidines; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Although a myriad of novel treatments entered the treatment paradigm for advanced melanoma, there is lack of head-to-head evidence. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate each treatment's relative effectiveness and safety.. A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE and Cochrane to identify all phase III randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with a time frame from January 1, 2010 to March 11, 2019. We retrieved evidence on treatment-related grade III/IV adverse events, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Evidence was synthesised using a Bayesian fixed-effect NMA. Reference treatment was dacarbazine. In accordance with RCTs, dacarbazine was pooled with temozolomide, paclitaxel and paclitaxel plus carboplatin. To increase homogeneity of the study populations, RCTs were only included if patients were not previously treated with novel treatments.. The SLR identified 28 phase III RCTs involving 14,376 patients. Nineteen and seventeen treatments were included in the effectiveness and safety NMA, respectively. For PFS, dabrafenib plus trametinib (hazard ratio [HR] PFS: 0.21) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR PFS: 0.22) were identified as most favourable treatments. Both had, however, less favourable safety profiles. Five other treatments closely followed (dabrafenib [HR PFS: 0.30], nivolumab plus ipilimumab [HR PFS: 0.34], vemurafenib [HR PFS: 0.38], nivolumab [HR PFS: 0.42] and pembrolizumab [HR PFS: 0.46]). In contrast, for OS, nivolumab plus ipilimumab (HR OS: 0.39), nivolumab (HR OS: 0.46) and pembrolizumab (HR OS: 0.50) were more favourable than dabrafenib plus trametinib (HR OS: 0.55) and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (HR OS: 0.57).. Our NMA identified the most effective treatment options for advanced melanoma and provided valuable insights into each novel treatment's relative effectiveness and safety. This information may facilitate evidence-based decision-making and may support the optimisation of treatment and outcomes in everyday clinical practice.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Cancer Vaccines; Carboplatin; Dacarbazine; gp100 Melanoma Antigen; Humans; Hydrazines; Imidazoles; Interleukin-2; Ipilimumab; Lenalidomide; Melanoma; Network Meta-Analysis; Nitrosourea Compounds; Nivolumab; Organophosphorus Compounds; Oximes; Paclitaxel; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Proportional Hazards Models; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Sorafenib; Survival Rate; Temozolomide; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

Approximately 50% of cutaneous melanomas harbor activating mutations of the BRAF-oncogene, making BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) the standard treatment for this disease. However, disease responses are limited in duration mainly due to acquired resistance. Dual MAPK pathway inhibition with addition of a MEK inhibitor (MEKi) to a BRAFi improved the efficacy and tolerability compared with BRAFi alone. Cobimetinib (Cotellic

Topics: Administration, Oral; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Melanoma; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

New treatments for metastatic melanoma work through distinct mechanisms: enhancing the immune response and blocking cellular proliferation. Agents that enhance the immune response include ipilimumab, pembrolizumb, and nivolumab; agents that block cellular proliferation include vemurafenib, dabrafenib, trametinib, cobimetinib, binimetinib, and selumetinib. The translational impact of laboratory discoveries has revolutionized management of metastatic melanoma and enhanced the prognosis of affected patients.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Humans; Imidazoles; Immunologic Factors; Indoles; Ipilimumab; Melanoma; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Nivolumab; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib is a new approved MEK inhibitor for first line treatment of metastatic melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. It improves tumor response rates and progression free survival compared to vemurafenib alone, while decreasing toxicities due to the paradoxical activation of the MAPK signaling pathway.. This review covers the pharmacology, efficacy, and toxicity data derived from clinical and preclinical studies on cobimetinib. It also reports ongoing trials evaluating cobimetinib to better understand future developments for this drug.. The combination of cobimetinib and vemurafenib seems to be more toxic than the combination therapy dabrafenib and trametinib even if these four drugs have never been compared in a randomized trial. The future of this combination depends on its capacity to be combined simultaneously or sequentially with immune based therapies to improve the durability of responses.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Clinical Trials, Phase I as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Indoles; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; MAP Kinase Kinase 2; Melanoma; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Melanoma causes the majority of skin cancer-related deaths. The outcome of melanoma depends on its stage at diagnosis. Currently, for patients with advanced melanoma, two MEK inhibitors (trametinib and cobimetinib) have been authorized by the European Medicines Agency. The main objective of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of trametinib-dabrafenib and cobimetinib-vemurafenib in patients with advanced melanoma through adjusted indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs).. A search was made up to the 3rd of November 2015. Databases consulted were MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library and the Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared the efficacy of trametinib-dabrafenib or cobimetinib-vemurafenib versus a common treatment comparator, in which outcomes of overall survival, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall response rate (ORR) were considered. ITCs were carried out using the method proposed by Bucher et al.. Two RCTs were included (one for each drugs combination). The results of the adjusted ITCs showed that there were no statistically significant differences between the two combinations in terms of PFS and ORR.. The ITCs indicate no difference in efficacy between both treatments. However, there should be an independent, head-to-head trial of both combinations to confirm the results.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Disease-Free Survival; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Melanoma; Neoplasm Staging; Oximes; Piperidines; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

In the recent years, melanoma patients' outcome and survival improved, mainly because of systemic treatment improvement with targeted therapy and checkpoint blockade. Targeted therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was approved to treat patients with unresectable or metastatic melanoma, harboring BRAF V600 mutations. This paper addresses the safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, when used in combination with vemurafenib, in the previous mentioned setting.. This article presents an overview on the rationale for clinical development of cobimetinib, as well as the mechanism of action, the efficacy and safety, and the most important trials that led to the approval of the combination therapy with vemurafenib. We searched the PubMed for published papers related to safety and efficacy of cobimetinib, and resistance mechanisms to BRAF inhibition. The abstract databases of the American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology were also searched for updates on the mentioned clinical trials. Expert commentary: Patients treated with targeted therapy experience a rapid tumor response. However, virtually all patients will develop resistance to treatment. Therapeutic combinations to overcome resistance mechanisms are currently addressed. In the future, targeted therapy strategy will include three or more drugs, probably from different therapeutic classes.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Humans; Indoles; Melanoma; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

During the past several years, targeted therapies have significantly improved outcomes in advanced basal cell carcinoma, psoriasis, and metastatic melanoma. This article reviews how advances in our understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of these diseases led to the development of targeted therapies and how these therapies are improving outcomes. Research is ongoing to address continuing challenges of drug resistance, adverse effects, and how best to use the new medications.

Topics: Adult; Anilides; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Brain Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Dermatologic Agents; Dermatology; Etanercept; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Interleukin-17; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Oximes; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Psoriasis; Pyridines; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha; Ustekinumab; Vemurafenib

Genentech (a subsidiary of Roche) and Exelixis are developing cobimetinib, an orally available small molecule, for the treatment of various cancers, including malignant melanoma and breast cancer. Cobimetinib inhibits the MEK (mitogen-activated protein kinase) component of the MAPK/ERK signalling pathway, which is frequently over-activated in human tumours. The product has been approved in Switzerland in combination with vemurafenib for the treatment of patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma, and is under regulatory review for the same indication in several countries, including the USA and the EU. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of cobimetinib leading to this first approval for unresectable or metastatic BRAF V600 mutation-positive melanoma melanoma.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Drug Approval; Humans; MAP Kinase Signaling System; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms

ImmunoCobiVem investigated whether a planned switch to atezolizumab after achieving tumour control during run-in with vemurafenib + cobimetinib improves progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) compared to continuous targeted therapy (TT) in patients with previously untreated advanced BRAF. In this multicenter phase 2 study, patients received vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. After 3months, patients without progressive disease (PD) were randomly assigned (1:1) to continue vemurafenib + cobimetinib (Arm A) or switch to atezolizumab (Arm B) until first documented PD (PD1). Primary outcome was PFS1 (time from start of run-in until PD1 or death). OS and safety were also assessed.. In patients with BRAF

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Novel therapies have achieved unprecedented benefit in survival of advanced melanoma patients. While immunotherapy (ICI) can be administered independent of mutational status, BRAF and MEK kinase inhibitors represent another effective treatment option for patients with BRAF mutant melanoma. Given the benefits these therapies demonstrate, the natural instinct was to combine. Three studies have investigated the benefit of combination of ICI using anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 antibody and targeted therapy (TT) with BRAF and MEK inhibitors over TT and placebo. Among these studies, statistically significantly superior duration of response was observed, however overall and progression-free survival were only numerically superior, if at all. One triple combination was approved for BRAF mutant metastatic melanoma; however, the expected synergistic effect of triple therapy could not be universally confirmed and the observed benefits with triple seem to depend on statistical considerations rather than a biological reason. As patients with BRAF mutant melanoma have both ICI and TT as their first-line treatment options, the question whether the sequence matters was addressed. Two prospective trials compared first-line ICI, followed by TT at progression, or vice-versa, with additional "sandwich" approach (8 weeks of TT followed by ICI until progression, then TT again) in the Secombit study. The benefit of first-line ICI was demonstrated in both studies with Secombit study showing the "sandwich" approach to have similar effect. Current data advices for immunotherapy based regiments in patients with BRAF mutant melanoma or, possibly, sandwich approach. Whether triple therapy is superior to ICI monotherapy still needs to be addressed considering not only efficacy, but also safety.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Studies carried out in vitro and in a mouse model have shown that BRAF inhibitors enhance the effects of IFN-α on BRAFV600E melanoma cells through the inhibition of ERK. Therefore, the combination of vemurafenib and IFN-α in patients with BRAFV600E melanoma may provide therapeutic benefits; MEK inhibition may prevent the reactivation of the MAPK pathway induced by BRAF inhibitor resistance.. In a phase I study, adult patients with advanced BRAFV600-mutated melanoma were treated with vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b or vemurafenib + cobimetinib + PEG-IFN-α-2b, to assess the safety of the combination and the upregulation of IFN-α/β receptor-1 (IFNAR1).. Eight patients were treated; 59 adverse events with four serious ones (three related to study treatments) were reported. Patients with a pre-treatment IFNAR1 expression on ≤ 35% melanoma cells had a median progression-free survival of 12.0 months (range: 5.6-18.4 months) and a median overall survival of 31.0 months (range: 19.8-42.2 months), while patients with a pre-treatment IFNAR1 expression on > 35% of melanoma cells had a median progression-free survival of 4.0 months (range: 0-8.8; p = 0.03), and a median overall survival of 5 months (p = 0.02). Following treatment, responders had higher levels of growth-suppressor genes, including GAS1 and DUSP1, and genes involved in a metabolically robust immune response, including FAP.. Our study supports the overall safety of the vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b + cobimetinib combination. IFNAR1 expression levels correlated with response to treatment, including survival. Vemurafenib + PEG-IFN-α-2b + cobimetinib would have difficulty finding a niche in the current treatment scenario for advanced melanoma, but we speculate that our findings may contribute to identify subjects particularly responsive to treatment.. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT01959633). Registered 10 October 2013, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01959633.

Topics: Adult; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Cell Cycle Proteins; GPI-Linked Proteins; Humans; Interferons; Melanoma; Mice; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

The randomized phase III coBRIM study (NCT01689519) demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with addition of cobimetinib to vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib in patients with previously untreated BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma. We report long-term follow-up of coBRIM, with at least 5 years since the last patient was randomized.. Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral cobimetinib (60 mg once daily on days 1-21 in each 28-day cycle) or placebo in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily).. 495 patients were randomized to cobimetinib plus vemurafenib (n = 247) or placebo plus vemurafenib (n = 248). Median follow-up was 21.2 months for cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 16.6 months for placebo plus vemurafenib. Median OS was 22.5 months (95% CI, 20.3-28.8) with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 17.4 months (95% CI, 15.0-19.8) with placebo plus vemurafenib; 5-year OS rates were 31% and 26%, respectively. Median PFS was 12.6 months (95% CI, 9.5-14.8) with cobimetinib plus vemurafenib and 7.2 months (95% CI, 5.6-7.5) with placebo plus vemurafenib; 5-year PFS rates were 14% and 10%, respectively. OS and PFS were longest in patients with normal baseline lactate dehydrogenase levels and low tumor burden, and in those achieving complete response. The safety profile remained consistent with previously published reports.. Extended follow-up of coBRIM confirms the long-term clinical benefit and safety profile of cobimetinib plus vemurafenib compared with vemurafenib monotherapy in patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Prognostic groups defined by lactate dehydrogenase concentration and number of organ sites containing metastases have been reported for patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib for advanced melanoma. We aimed to validate these prognostic groups for patients treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib in the coBRIM and BRIM-3 clinical studies. Eight hundred nine patients were included, 240 treated with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib and 569 with vemurafenib. For patients treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib, both overall survival (P < 0.001, c-statistic = 0.72) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001, c-statistic = 0.65) differed markedly between prognostic groups. Two-year progression-free survival ranged from 3 (lactate dehydrogenase ≥2 times the upper limit of normal) to 50% (normal lactate dehydrogenase and ≤3 sites), and two-year overall survival ranged from 7 to 71%. For patients treated with vemurafenib monotherapy, overall survival (P < 0.001, c-statistic = 0.66) and progression-free survival (P < 0.001, c-statistic = 0.62) also differed significantly between prognostic groups. In conclusion, prognostic groups identified for patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib are also applicable to patients treated with vemurafenib and cobimentinib.

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Biomarkers; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; L-Lactate Dehydrogenase; Male; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oximes; Piperidines; Prognosis; Progression-Free Survival; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

To report the 5-year overall survival (OS) landmark and the long-term safety profile of vemurafenib plus cobimetinib (BRAF plus MEK inhibition, respectively) in the BRIM7 study.. Median OS was 31.8 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 24.5-not estimable] in the BRAFi-naïve cohort. The landmark OS rate plateaued at 39.2% at years 4 and 5 of follow-up. In the vemurafenib monotherapy-PD cohort, the median OS was 8.5 months (95% CI, 6.7-11.1), and the landmark OS rate plateaued at 14.0% from 3 years of follow-up. No increase was observed in the frequency and severity of adverse events with long-term follow-up. No new toxicities were detected, and there was no increase in the frequency of symptomatic MEK inhibitor class-effect adverse events.. A subset of patients with advanced

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Cohort Studies; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Patient Safety; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib; Young Adult

Serous chorioretinopathy has been associated with MEK inhibitors, including cobimetinib. We describe the clinical features of serous retinopathy observed with cobimetinib in patients with BRAF. In the coBRIM study, 493 patients were treated in two randomly assigned treatment groups: cobimetinib and vemurafenib (n = 247) or vemurafenib (n = 246). All patients underwent prospective ophthalmic examinations at screening, at regular intervals during the study, and whenever ocular symptoms developed. Patients with serous retinopathy were identified in the study database using a group of relevant and synonymous adverse event terms.. Eighty-six serous retinopathy events were reported in 70 patients (79 events in 63 cobimetinib and vemurafenib-treated patients vs seven events in seven vemurafenib-treated patients). Most patients with serous retinopathy identified by ophthalmic examination had no symptoms or had mild symptoms, among them reduced visual acuity, blurred vision, dyschromatopsia, and photophobia. Serous retinopathy usually occurred early during cobimetinib and vemurafenib treatment; median time to onset was 1.0 month. Most events were managed by observation and continuation of cobimetinib without dose modification and resolved or were resolving by the data cutoff date (19 Sept 2014).. Cobimetinib treatment was associated with serous retinopathy in patients with BRAF

Topics: Adult; Aged; Azetidines; Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Recurrence; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Time Factors; Vemurafenib

The combination of cobimetinib with vemurafenib improves progression-free survival compared with placebo and vemurafenib in previously untreated patients with BRAF(V600)-mutant advanced melanoma, as previously reported in the coBRIM study. In this Article, we report updated efficacy results, including overall survival and safety after longer follow-up, and selected biomarker correlative studies.. In this double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically confirmed BRAF(V600) mutation-positive unresectable stage IIIC or stage IV melanoma were randomly assigned (1:1) using an interactive response system to receive cobimetinib (60 mg once daily for 21 days followed by a 7-day rest period in each 28-day cycle) or placebo, in combination with oral vemurafenib (960 mg twice daily). Progression-free and overall survival were primary and secondary endpoints, respectively; all analyses were done on the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01689519, and is ongoing but no longer recruiting participants.. Between Jan 8, 2013, and Jan 31, 2014, 495 eligible adult patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib group (n=247) or placebo plus vemurafenib group (n=248). At a median follow-up of 14·2 months (IQR 8·5-17·3), the updated investigator-assessed median progression-free survival was 12·3 months (95% CI 9·5-13·4) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 7·2 months (5·6-7·5) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·58 [95% CI 0·46-0·72], p<0·0001). The final analysis for overall survival occurred when 255 (52%) patients had died (Aug 28, 2015). Median overall survival was 22·3 months (95% CI 20·3-not estimable) for cobimetinib and vemurafenib versus 17·4 months (95% CI 15·0-19·8) for placebo and vemurafenib (HR 0·70, 95% CI 0·55-0·90; p=0·005). The safety profile for cobimetinib and vemurafenib was tolerable and manageable, and no new safety signals were observed with longer follow-up. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events occurring at a higher frequency in patients in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group compared with the vemurafenib group were γ-glutamyl transferase increase (36 [15%] in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group vs 25 [10%] in the placebo and vemurafenib group), blood creatine phosphokinase increase (30 [12%] vs one [<1%]), and alanine transaminase increase (28 [11%] vs 15 [6%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 92 patients (37%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 69 patients (28%) in the vemurafenib group. Pyrexia (six patients [2%]) and dehydration (five patients [2%]) were the most common serious adverse events reported in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group. A total of 259 patients have died: 117 (47%) in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 142 (58%) in the vemurafenib group. The primary cause of death was disease progression in most patients: 109 (93%) of 117 in the cobimetinib and vemurafenib group and 133 (94%) of 142 in the vemurafenib group.. These data confirm the clinical benefit of cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib and support the use of the combination as a standard first-line approach to improve survival in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutant melanoma.. F Hoffmann-La Roche-Genentech.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Biomarkers, Tumor; Double-Blind Method; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Piperidines; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Vemurafenib; Young Adult

Addition of a MEK inhibitor to a BRAF inhibitor enhances tumour growth inhibition, delays acquired resistance, and abrogates paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in preclinical models of BRAF-mutated melanoma. We assessed the safety and efficacy of combined BRAF inhibition with vemurafenib and MEK inhibition with cobimetinib in patients with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma.. We undertook a phase 1b study in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma. We included individuals who had either recently progressed on vemurafenib or never received a BRAF inhibitor. In the dose-escalation phase of our study, patients received vemurafenib 720 mg or 960 mg twice a day continuously and cobimetinib 60 mg, 80 mg, or 100 mg once a day for either 14 days on and 14 days off (14/14), 21 days on and 7 days off (21/7), or continuously (28/0). The primary endpoint was safety of the drug combination and to identify dose-limiting toxic effects and the maximum tolerated dose. Efficacy was a key secondary endpoint. All patients treated with vemurafenib and cobimetinib were included in safety and efficacy analyses (intention-to-treat). The study completed accrual and all analyses are final. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01271803.. 129 patients were treated at ten dosing regimens combining vemurafenib and cobimetinib: 66 had recently progressed on vemurafenib and 63 had never received a BRAF inhibitor. Dose-limiting toxic effects arose in four patients. One patient on a schedule of vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day and cobimetinib 80 mg once a day 14/14 had grade 3 fatigue for more than 7 days; one patient on a schedule of vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day and cobimetinib 60 mg once a day 21/7 had a grade 3 prolongation of QTc; and two patients on a schedule of vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day and cobimetinib 60 mg 28/0 had dose-limiting toxic effects-one developed grade 3 stomatitis and fatigue and one developed arthralgia and myalgia. The maximum tolerated dose was established as vemurafenib 960 mg twice a day in combination with cobimetinib 60 mg 21/7. Across all dosing regimens, the most common adverse events were diarrhoea (83 patients, 64%), non-acneiform rash (77 patients, 60%), liver enzyme abnormalities (64 patients, 50%), fatigue (62 patients, 48%), nausea (58 patients, 45%), and photosensitivity (52 patients, 40%). Most adverse events were mild-to-moderate in severity. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were cutaneous squamous-cell carcinoma (12 patients, 9%; all grade 3), raised amounts of alkaline phosphatase (11 patients, 9%]), and anaemia (nine patients, 7%). Confirmed objective responses were recorded in ten (15%) of 66 patients who had recently progressed on vemurafenib, with a median progression-free survival of 2·8 months (95% CI 2·6-3·4). Confirmed objective responses were noted in 55 (87%) of 63 patients who had never received a BRAF inhibitor, including six (10%) who had a complete response; median progression-free survival was 13·7 months (95% CI 10·1-17·5).. The combination of vemurafenib and cobimetinib was safe and tolerable when administered at the respective maximum tolerated doses. The combination has promising antitumour activity and further clinical development is warranted in patients with advanced BRAF(V600)-mutated melanoma, particularly in those who have never received a BRAF inhibitor; confirmatory clinical testing is ongoing.. F Hoffmann-La Roche/Genentech.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Azetidines; Disease-Free Survival; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Indoles; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Maximum Tolerated Dose; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Invasiveness; Neoplasm Staging; Patient Selection; Piperidines; Prospective Studies; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Risk Assessment; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

Combined treatment with BRAFi and/or MEK inhibitors (MEKi) improves outcomes in advanced melanoma patients in comparison with monotherapy.. We aim to report real-world treatment efficacy and safety of vemurafenib (V) and vemurafenib + cobimetinib (V + C) from 10 years of practice.. A total of 275 consecutive patients with unresectable or metastatic BRAF mutated melanoma started first-line V or V + C treatment between 1 October 2013 and 31 December 2020. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and Log-rank and Chi-square tests were used for comparison between groups.. The estimated median overall survival (mOS) was 10.3 months in the V group, and 12.3 months in the V + C group (p = 0.0005; HR = 1.58, 95% CI 1.2-2.1), although the latter group of patients had lactate dehydrogenase elevated numerically more often. Estimated median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.5 months in the V group, and 8.3 months in the V + C group (p = 0.0002; HR = 1.62, 95% CI 1.3-2.1). Complete response, partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease as best responses were recorded in the V/V + C groups in 7%/10%, 52%/46%, 26%/28%, and 15%/16% of patients, respectively. The numbers of patients with any grade of adverse effects were similar in both groups.. We confirmed significant improvement in the mOS and mPFS of unresectable and/or metastatic BRAF mutated-melanoma patients treated outside clinical trials with V + C as compared with V, with no major increase in toxicity for the combination.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Humans; Melanoma; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Anemia; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Humans; Melanoma; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Stevens-Johnson Syndrome; Vemurafenib

Melanoma is a complex and heterogenous disease, displays the deadliest form of skin cancer, and accounts for approx. 80% of all skin cancer deaths. In this study, we reported on the synthesis and pharmacological effects of a novel shikonin derivative (SK119), which is active in a nano-molar range and exhibits several promising in vitro effects in different human melanoma cells. SK119 was synthesized from shikonin as part of our search for novel, promising shikonin derivatives. It was screened against a panel of melanoma and non-tumorigenic cell lines using XTT viability assays. Moreover, we studied its pharmacological effects using apoptosis and Western blot experiments. Finally, it was combined with current clinically used melanoma therapeutics. SK119 exhibited IC

Topics: Apoptosis; Azetidines; Cell Line; Humans; Melanoma; Naphthoquinones; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Cobimetinib combined with vemurafenib was available in France in 2015 through a 'Temporary Authorization for Use' program (TAU, preapproval access pending its marketing on 2016) for patients with v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1-mutant advanced melanoma. This study aimed to provide real-world outcomes in patients previously registered in this TAU. This noninterventional, ambispective, multicentre French study, conducted in patients previously registered in TAU, aimed to estimate overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) and to describe the tolerability of the therapeutic combination. At first cobimetinib intake (in combination with vemurafenib), 88% of the 185 evaluable patients had disease stage IV (brain metastasis: 70% of them), 31% had elevated lactate dehydrogenases, and 10% had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) index ≥2. Median OS was 16.1 months (95% CI, 12.5-20.7). Brain metastasis ( P < 0.001), ECOG index ≥2 ( P = 0.007), and hepatic impairment ( P = 0.037) were found as independent factors significantly associated with shorter survival. Median PFS was 7.3 months (95% CI, 5.2-8.4). ECOG index ≥2 ( P = 0.006) was significantly associated with shorter PFS. Between cobimetinib start and inclusion, increased CPK (3% of patients), retinal serous detachment (3%), decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (3%), increased transaminases (3%), and rash (3%) were the most reported serious adverse events. This study provides real-world outcomes in France for the vemurafenib-cobimetinib combination available in patients with BRAF-mutant-advanced melanoma. Our data tend to confirm in the real-life setting that this combination therapy is effective in such patients, with a safety profile consistent with previous interventional studies.

Topics: Adult; Animals; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Brain Neoplasms; Humans; Melanoma; Mice; Mutation; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Stroke Volume; Vemurafenib; Ventricular Function, Left

The outcomes of patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) have significantly improved after the introduction of BRAF-specific inhibitors. Herein is reported a patient with MM and non-V600-BRAF mutation who responded to iBRAF/iMEK therapy. In July 2014, a 63-year-old man presented with a 4.1mm-thick V600E-BRAF wild type melanoma on the back. Metastases were identified in one sentinel node and two of 11 subsequently excised lymph nodes, with no signs of distant metastatic disease. In September 2017, lung metastasis was observed and pembrolizumab was started. Progressive disease was apparent at cycle 10 and therapy was switched to ipilimumab. After four cycles, an asymmetric response was observed. In November 2017, next generation sequencing genomic profiling disclosed a rare L597K-BRAF mutation and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib therapy was initiated in January 2018. Seven days after treatment start, a remarkable clinical improvement was observed. In April 2018, the patient achieved partial response, which was sustained until October 2018. Cases of patients with non-V600-BRAF mutations responding to iBRAF/iMEK therapy have been reported over the last years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case reporting response to combined iBRAF/iMEK therapy in a patient with metastatic melanoma harboring L597K mutation.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Back; Dacarbazine; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oximes; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Biomarkers, Tumor; Female; Gene Fusion; Humans; Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) associated with BRAF inhibitors alone versus combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors are not fully understood.. This study included all adult patients who received BRAF inhibitors (vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib) or combinations BRAF/MEK inhibitors (vemurafenib/cobimetinib; dabrafenib/trametinib; encorafenib/binimetinib). We utilized the cross-sectional FDA's Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) and longitudinal Truven Health Analytics/IBM MarketScan database from 2011 to 2018. Various CVAEs, including arterial hypertension, heart failure (HF), and venous thromboembolism (VTE), were studied using adjusted regression techniques.. In FAERS, 7752 AEs were reported (40% BRAF and 60% BRAF/MEK). Median age was 60 (IQR 49-69) years with 45% females and 97% with melanoma. Among these, 567 (7.4%) were cardiovascular adverse events (mortality rate 19%). Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy was associated with increased risk for HF (reporting odds ratio [ROR] = 1.62 (CI = 1.14-2.30); p = 0.007), arterial hypertension (ROR = 1.75 (CI = 1.12-2.89); p = 0.02) and VTE (ROR = 1.80 (CI = 1.12-2.89); p = 0.02). Marketscan had 657 patients with median age of 53 years (IQR 46-60), 39.3% female, and 88.7% with melanoma. There were 26.2% CVAEs (CI: 14.8%-36%) within 6 months of medication start in those receiving combination therapy versus 16.7% CVAEs (CI: 13.1%-20.2%) among those receiving monotherapy. Combination therapy was associated with CVAEs compared to monotherapy (adjusted HR: 1.56 (CI: 1.01-2.42); p = 0.045).. In two independent real-world cohorts, combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors were associated with increased CVAEs compared to monotherapy, especially HF, and hypertension.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Carbamates; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Cardiotoxicity; Cardiovascular Diseases; Colonic Neoplasms; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hypertension; Imidazoles; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Registries; Regression Analysis; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib; Venous Thromboembolism; Young Adult

Rash is one of the most common severe adverse events associated with use of vemurafenib for the treatment of melanoma, either as monotherapy or in combination with cobimetinib. The study aimed to identify pre-treatment patient characteristics predictive of developing severe rash with vemurafenib therapy.. This was a secondary pooled analysis of individual patient data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3 and coBRIM clinical trials, including all patients treated with vemurafenib alone and vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Patient age, sex, performance status, body weight, body mass index, liver function markers and estimated glomerular filtration rate were assessed for association with development of severe (grade 3 or 4) rash using logistic regression.. Of 962 patients treated with vemurafenib, 150 (16%) patients experienced severe rash. Female sex was identified as a significant risk factor for severe rash development (P < 0.001), having a two-fold increased risk compared to males (22% vs 11%, odds ratio [OR] 2.17; 95% CI 1.52 to 3.09). Low body weight was also associated with increased risk of severe rash (P = 0.002), but this association was not significant after adjustment for sex. The association between sex and risk of severe rash was consistent across clinical trials and treatments (vemurafenib monotherapy, vemurafenib plus cobimetinib).. Females had approximately two-fold increased risk of developing severe rash compared to males in clinical trials of vemurafenib alone or in combination with cobimetinib.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Australia; Azetidines; Clinical Trials as Topic; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Incidence; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Piperidines; Risk Factors; Sex Factors; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Biopsy; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Melanoma; Neoplasms, Multiple Primary; Oximes; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

This study aimed to assess whether dabrafenib/trametinib and vemurafenib/cobimetinib treatments are associated with a change in skeletal muscle area (SMA) and total fat-free mass (FFM) assessed by computed tomography (CT), and to compare the efficacy and safety profile of these treatments in patients with metastatic melanoma. Thirty-one patients treated with B-Raf proto-oncogene, serine/threonine kinase/MAPK extracellular receptor kinase inhibitors were included between 2016 and 2019. Eighteen patients received dabrafenib/trametinib and remaining patients received vemurafenib/cobimetinib. CT scans were performed at baseline and at 4-6 months of follow-up to measure cross-sectional areas of SMA. FFM and skeletal muscle index (SMI) values were calculated. Of the patients, including 18 treated with dabrafenib/trametinib (58.1%) and 13 with vemurafenib/cobimetinib (41.9%); 58.1% were male, 41.9% were female and median age was 52 years. A significant decrease in SMA was observed after dabrafenib/trametinib and vemurafenib/cobimetinib treatments (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002, respectively). A significant decrease in FFM values was observed after dabrafenib/trametinib and vemurafenib/cobimetinib treatments (P = 0.003 and P = 0.002, respectively). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed in 35.9% of the patients with sarcopenia. No significant difference was seen between the dabrafenib/trametinib and vemurafenib/cobimetinib groups in median progression-free survival (PFS) (11.9 vs. 7.3 months, respectively, P = 0.28) and in median overall survival (OS) (25.46 vs. 13.7 months, respectively, P = 0.41). Baseline sarcopenia was not significantly associated with PFS or OS (P = 0.172 and P = 0.326, respectively). We found a significant decrease in SMI values determined at 4-6 months compared to the values before treatment both in dabrafenib/trametinib and vemurafenib/cobimetinib groups. DLT was similar with both treatments. Baseline sarcopenia was not significantly associated with PFS or OS.

Topics: Azetidines; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Mas; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

New primary melanomas (NPMs) in the era of combination treatments for melanoma constitute a challenge for physicians, especially due to the increased incidence of NPMs in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. We present the unique case of a patient that developed an invasive NPM while under treatment with a combination of vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab. A 39-year-old white male was treated with vemurafenib, cobimetinib, and atezolizumab for a stage IV (T0, N3, M1) BRAF-V600E mutated malignant melanoma in the context of a clinical trial. Eight months from treatment initiation he was diagnosed with an NPM on his back that was found to be BRAF-wild type and neuroblastoma ras mutated, while he was in complete remission. Wide excision of the lesion followed, and the patient was not withdrawn from study treatment. Twenty-two months from treatment initiation, he is still in complete remission. NPMs are a well-known adverse effect of BRAF inhibitors and pose a challenge for the treating physician since these lesions are BRAF-wild type and usually have aggressive biologic behaviour. Invasive NPMs require an aggressive management strategy with clear guidelines to prevent the emergence of advanced or metastatic disease. The emergence of invasive NPMs in patients treated with triple regimens with BRAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors and PD1/PDL1 inhibitors is at least unexpected and constitutes a therapeutic stalemate for the physician. Through this case report, we aim to increase awareness about the diagnosis and management of patients with NPM and to express our concerns regarding further management of NPMs in patients under triple combination treatment.

Topics: Adult; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Aged; Azetidines; Female; Granuloma; Humans; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Sarcoidosis; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

A 38-year-old man with a diagnosis of BRAF-mutated metastatic melanoma was referred to our clinic. He had been under treatment with 60-mg oral cobimetinib daily for 21 days/7 day off in combination with 960 mg vemurafenib twice daily. The patient had symptoms of blurred vision and photophobia in his right eye. A slit-lamp examination revealed bilateral central corneal stromal opacity and epithelial microcystic edema Involvement was more severe in the right eye compared with the left eye. Fourteen days after the first visit, the patient's symptoms and slit-lamp findings were largely resolved. We suggest that endothelium pump failure was involved in this acute corneal decompensation case similar to the mechanism in retinal pigment epithelium.

Topics: Acute Disease; Administration, Oral; Adult; Azetidines; Corneal Edema; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms; Vision Disorders

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Azetidines; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Prognosis; Risk Assessment; Sampling Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

A survival benefit was demonstrated by dabrafenib + trametinib for metastatic BRAF-mutated melanoma patients. Best response is a strong prognostic marker for survival.. The specific features associated with complete response (CR) were evaluated.. A total of 15/66 patients achieved CR. Median size of lesions was 3 cm (range: 0.5-10). Using that value as cut-off, the CR rate was 39.3% in patients with smaller lesions and 10.5% in patients with bigger size (p = 0.006). The clinical features associated with CR were the number of metastatic sites and the largest diameter of the biggest metastatic site.. The number of the metastases and the diameter of the largest metastatic site are associated with a higher CR rate.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

With the advent of immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted treatments (TT), there have been unprecedented response rates and survival in advanced melanoma, but the optimal sequencing of these two treatments modalities is unknown. Combining or sequencing these agents could potentially result in unique toxicities. Cutaneous adverse events (CAE) after sequential exposure to these agents represents one toxicity that needs further description.. After retrospectively reviewing charts of patients from 2015 to 2018, we identified six patients who experienced CAEs after recent exposure to sequential immunotherapy and TT or vice versa for the treatment for metastatic melanoma at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. Skin biopsies were available in five patients.. Five patients received TT after immunotherapy, and one patient received immunotherapy after TT. TT consisted of vemurafenib/cobimetinib (V/C) in five patients with four patients starting V/C immediately before manifesting with a CAE. In patients receiving V/C after immunotherapy, the median time from beginning V/C to development of CAE was 14.5 days. The clinical presentation of diffuse morbilliform rash, fevers, hypotension, and end-organ damage raised concern for Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome. Histopathological features of lympho-eosinophilic infiltrate were supportive of a drug eruption. Immunotherapy or TT were re-initiated in five patients within 1-8 weeks after resolution of the index CAE. This resulted in two patients re-experiencing the CAE. Both of these patients were off prednisone at the time of therapy re-initiation, whereas none of the patients who were restarted on targeted therapy with a steroid overlap had a rash recurrence.. Sequential treatment using immunotherapy and TT, especially the sequence of V/C after immunotherapy appears to be the most common trigger for CAE with a median time to onset of approximately 2 weeks. Although the clinical presentation of these CAEs can be dramatic, they respond well to prednisone therapy. This unique presentation suggests that it may be reasonably safe to re-challenge certain patients with a steroid overlap after rash resolution.

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Azetidines; Exanthema; Female; Humans; Immunotherapy; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Nivolumab; Piperidines; Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Oximes; Piperidines; Polyneuropathies; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Undifferentiated sarcoma has been hypothesized as an intermediate step in the progression of malignant melanoma to rhabdomyosarcoma. The current report describes a new case of rhabdomyosarcomatous transformation in a malignant melanoma and documents the temporal progression of the malignant melanoma to rhabdomyosarcoma in different metastatic sites via undifferentiated sarcoma. A 65-year-old female with a past medical history of malignant melanoma presented with a new lung mass. A core biopsy revealed a malignant spindle cell neoplasm that was negative for all melanocytic markers, suggesting the possibility of a primary pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma or sarcoma. The subsequent lobectomy demonstrated an undifferentiated spindle cell neoplasm with areas of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation. Review of the skin lesion and lymph nodes confirmed the diagnosis of the primary cutaneous malignant melanoma, but also revealed that the nodal metastases had largely transformed into an undifferentiated sarcoma with similar morphology as the spindle cell neoplasm in the lung. Molecular studies demonstrated an identical

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Biomarkers, Tumor; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Diagnosis, Differential; Disease Progression; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Humans; Lung; Lung Neoplasms; Melanoma; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Piperidines; Pneumonectomy; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Rhabdomyosarcoma; Skin; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Radiation recall dermatitis is an uncommon inflammatory reaction of the skin appearing after several days to several years at the site of previous irradiation; it is precipitated by the use of triggering drugs, although rarely by BRAF or MEK inhibitors.. We report an unusual case of recall dermatitis induced 3 months after initiation of vemurafenib and cobimetinib therapy.. Radiation recall dermatitis is a cutaneous reaction that must be known and which in rare cases such as ours may occur a long time after the end of radiotherapy.

Topics: Adrenal Gland Neoplasms; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Ear Auricle; Ear Neoplasms; Facial Dermatoses; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Radiodermatitis; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Azetidines; Erythema Multiforme; Female; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Gastrointestinal toxicities of MEK inhibitors in melanoma patients are frequent. In clinical trials, the most common digestive adverse events were nausea, vomiting, and diarrhoea. However, severe toxicities such as colitis and gastrointestinal perforation, some with fatal outcomes, have been reported. These rare but severe adverse events are not well described. We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients with stage IV and unresectable stage III melanoma treated with a MEK inhibitors at Saint-Louis Hospital, Paris, between 1 August 2013 and 15 October 2018. Among 119 patients exposed to MEK inhibitors, 78 were treated with trametinib, 19 with cobimetinib, four with binimetinib, and 18 patients with two different MEK inhibitors at separate times. All grade digestive adverse events were observed in 39 (32.7%) patients. Grade 3 and 4 adverse events occurred in 6 (5%) patients: 2 (1.7%) developed perforations, 3 (2.5%) had colitis and 1 (0.8%) had grade 4 diarrhoea. These adverse events were all reversible following a permanent discontinuation of the MEK inhibitors, or a temporary interruption followed by resumption at a dose lower than conventional posology. There were no fatal outcomes; however one patient had a permanent ileostomy. The mechanism underlying these toxicities is not well known. Clinicians should be aware of such toxicities.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Databases, Factual; Enzyme Inhibitors; Female; Gastrointestinal Tract; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

We conducted a retrospective analysis to evaluate the impact of concomitant acid-reducing agents (ARAs) and vemurafenib dose on the efficacy of vemurafenib in patients with BRAF. Data were pooled for patients treated with vemurafenib or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib in the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies. The primary end-points were progression-free survival and overall survival across patient subgroups defined by vemurafenib dose (full vs reduced) and concomitant ARA use (yes vs no). Objective response rate (ORR) was also analysed. Steady-state vemurafenib concentrations were evaluated according to vemurafenib dosing and concomitant ARA use across treatment cohorts in a subset of patients from BRIM-7 and coBRIM with available concentration data.. Efficacy analyses included 920 patients: 641 in the vemurafenib cohort and 279 in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort. Overall, no significant differences in survival outcomes were observed across subgroups according to vemurafenib dose and ARA use, with or without adjustment for known prognostic covariates, in both treatment cohorts. ORR was also similar across subgroups in both treatment cohorts. Steady-state vemurafenib concentrations were analysed in 389 patients (193 in the vemurafenib cohort and 196 in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort) and were generally similar across vemurafenib dose subgroups, regardless of ARA use in both treatment cohorts.. Results of this retrospective pooled analysis suggest that ARAs can be used concomitantly with vemurafenib, alone or in combination with cobimetinib, without compromising the efficacy of vemurafenib.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antacids; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant; Middle Aged; Mutation; Piperidines; Progression-Free Survival; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

Prognostic models may provide insight into clinical trial results and inform the clinical management of patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma.. To identify subgroups with distinct survival outcomes based on clinical and genomic characteristics and to assess survival in identified prognostic subgroups across cohorts treated with dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib.. This retrospective and exploratory recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) modeled associations between prespecified covariates and survival outcomes using pooled data from the BRIM-2, BRIM-3, BRIM-7, and coBRIM studies.. Dacarbazine, vemurafenib, or cobimetinib plus vemurafenib.. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.. The RPA included 1365 patients (783 men; 57.4%). Of these, 1032 (75.6%) were older than 65 years; 310 received cobimetinib plus vemurafenib; 717, vemurafenib alone; and 338, dacarbazine. Median follow-up was 14.1 months (interquartile range, 6.3-28.3 months). In the RPA that included all patients, baseline lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS), presence or absence of liver metastases, and baseline sum of longest diameters of target lesions (SLDs) were significant prognostic factors for PFS: Median PFS was longest in patients with lower LDH (≤2 × upper limit of normal [ULN]), ECOG PS 0, and shorter SLD (≤44 mm) (11.1 months; 95% CI, 7.0-18.4 months), and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (3.5 months; 95% CI, 3.0-3.8 months). The subgroup with normal baseline LDH and no liver metastases had the longest median OS (22.7 months; 95% CI, 20.3-27.2 months). Similar PFS trends were observed when these prognostic subgroups were applied to the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib, vemurafenib alone, and dacarbazine cohorts. Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, and SLD were significant prognostic factors for OS: Median OS was longest in patients with normal LDH and shorter SLD (≤45 mm) (27.2 months; 95% CI, 22.1-32.1 months) and shortest in those with elevated LDH (>2 × ULN) (6.0 months; 95% CI, 5.3-6.8 months). Among patients in the most favorable subgroup (normal LDH and SLD ≤45 mm), 3-year OS rates were 53.3% (95% CI, 39.5%-67.1%) in the cobimetinib plus vemurafenib cohort, 35.6% (95% CI, 27.4%-43.8%) in the vemurafenib cohort, and 35.6% (95% CI, 24.8%-46.4%) in the dacarbazine cohort. Among patients with available gene expression data, RPA identified gene signature as a significant prognostic factor for PFS in those with normal LDH; 3-year PFS rates were 21.9%, (95% CI, 15.4%-28.4%) and 8.8% (95% CI, 3.6%-14.1%) in immune and cell cycle signature, respectively. The RPA for OS did not identify gene signature as a significant factor.. Baseline LDH, ECOG PS, disease burden, and gene signature appear to be key determinants of survival outcomes in patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with BRAF and/or MEK inhibitors. These results are consistent with survival benefits of cobimetinib plus vemurafenib over vemurafenib alone observed in the coBRIM study.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Dacarbazine; Female; Humans; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Prognosis; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) are among the cornerstones of metastatic melanoma therapy demonstrating excellent response rates with duration of 7-12 m. Long-term benefit from these agents was reported in patients with normal lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) and less than three disease sites. However, a treatment-dependent marker for long-term efficacy is lacking. Data suggest that immune-related adverse events (irAEs) are associated with clinical benefit in patients treated with immunotherapy and that response to BRAF/MEK therapy may have an underlying immune mechanism. We hypothesised that AEs with an underlying immune mechanism may be associated with a durable response to targeted therapy. We retrospectively identified a cohort of 78 BRAF V600-mutant metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAFi or BRAFi + MEKi between November 2010 and November 2013. Four treatment-related AEs including vitiligo, uveitis, erythema nodosum and keratitis sicca were defined as irAEs of interest. Retrospective analysis of AEs in relationship to progression-free survival (PFS), disease burden and LDH levels was performed. Median PFS (mPFS) for all patients was 7.5 months with responses ongoing in eight patients as of April 2017. Ten patients were identified with the AEs defined previously. Cox regression analysis revealed a very strong association between those AEs and PFS; mPFS was 42.8 m in patients with at least one AE versus 6.1 m in those without an AE (hazard ratio [HR] 0.22, p = 0.002). This association was independent of LDH levels and disease burden (HR 0.24, p = 0.035). This analysis demonstrates a strong association between immune AEs and durable response to targeted therapy and may provide a treatment-related biomarker to estimate the outcome of therapy.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Arthralgia; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Imidazoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mutation; Neoplasm Metastasis; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Diseases; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib; Young Adult

Combined treatment with BRAF-V600 and MEK inhibitors has significantly improved progression-free and overall survival of patients with BRAF-mutated melanoma. Pattern of disease progression and outcomes in patients have not been fully characterized.. We conducted a single-center, retrospective, descriptive analysis of a cohort of 52 patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors for advanced melanoma over a 12-month period. The aim of this study was to characterize disease progression, defined as metastatic pattern, disease kinetics, and response to subsequent therapies, in melanoma patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors.. Disease progression was observed in 31/52 (59.6%) patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors. Relapse of melanoma involved the CNS for 22/31 (70.9%) patients with disease progression, including 18/31 (58%) patients who had exclusive intracranial metastases. Sixteen patients died from disease progression. Among the 31 patients who had disease progression, the median time until a relapse was 8 months, and the median survival time after disease progression was 2 months.. Our study shows that, for patients treated with BRAF-V600 + MEK inhibitors who lose response, disease progression was aggressive and had poor outcomes. Most patients had CNS metastases and low rates of therapeutic response to any subsequent therapy.

Topics: Acrylonitrile; Aged; Aniline Compounds; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Disease Progression; Female; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

We present a case report of an early-onset drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS syndrome) induced by vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor) in a middle-age man affected by a metastatic, BRAF mutant melanoma who was started on first-line metastatic treatment with vemurafenib and cobimetinib.After initiating the treatment, the patient presented an extensive cutaneous rash with eosinophilia and renal impairment. Due the constellation of signs and symptoms, a diagnosis of DRESS syndrome was made which strongly contraindicated the reintroduction of vemurafenib due to its hypersensibility reaction. Thus, vemurafenib was stopped immediately, and we started corticoid treatment with clinical improvement.Due to the contraindication to start vemurafenib again, after multidisciplinary view of the case and having balanced the risks and benefits, we successfully performed a switch to another BRAF inhibitor in a progressively ascending pattern, without any skin toxicity and with a good response of the metastatic melanoma.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adrenal Cortex Hormones; Azetidines; Drug Hypersensitivity Syndrome; Eosinophilia; Exanthema; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

A combined therapy MEK inhibitor, Cobimetinib (CB) and BRAF inhibitor, Vemurafenib (VMF), results in an improvement in progression-free survival among patients with BRAF V600-mutated metastatic melanoma. VMF skin adverse effects attributed to ERK paradoxical activation are decreased by the adjunction of CB. The aim of this study was to determine if this combination also improved the renal side effects of VMF.. To investigate the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI), we conducted a retrospective observational monocentric study in Lyon Sud University Hospital in France. We included 38 patients with metastatic BRAF-mutated melanomas treated by VMF and CB between March 2015 and June 2016. According to the NCI-CTCAE classification, AKI was defined as an increase in serum creatinine exceeding the baseline concentration by 1.5-fold. Serum creatinine was measured before treatment, then on a monthly basis during treatment, and 1 month after treatment discontinuation. Patients were divided into two main groups: AKI-positive (AKI+) and AKI-negative (AKI-), and further subdivided into three groups according to AKI severity (stage 1-5).. Of 38 patients, 29 (76%) were AKI-, and all 9 AKI+ patients (24%) were diagnosed within the first trimester of treatment. Three-quarters of AKI (n = 7, 77%) had stage 1 AKI and the remaining 23% stage 2 AKI. Pre-treatment renal function was significantly better in AKI+ group: 105 vs. 80 ml/min/1.73m² AKI-, p = 0.009. Compared to previous results, the AKI incidence under the combined VMF-CB vs. VMF monotherapy was reduced by 60%.. We reported a reduced incidence and severity of nephrotoxicity of the association inhibitors of BRAF and MEK compared to a BRAF inhibitor monotherapy.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Creatinine; Disease-Free Survival; Enzyme Inhibitors; Extracellular Signal-Regulated MAP Kinases; Female; Humans; Incidence; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Brain Neoplasms; Demyelinating Diseases; Female; Guillain-Barre Syndrome; Humans; Indoles; Liver Neoplasms; Lung Neoplasms; Lymphatic Metastasis; MAP Kinase Kinase Kinases; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Polyradiculoneuropathy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Therapeutic advances derived from targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors can improve melanoma prognosis. Since 2015, cobimetinib has been approved in combination with vemurafenib in the first-line treatment for BRAF-mutated melanoma. For NRAS-mutated melanomas, MEK inhibition seems to be a therapeutic target, and association with checkpoint inhibitor provides a further therapeutic perspective. Infraclinical creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation is an MEK inhibitor side effect. We describe a case of focal necrotizing myopathy with 'dropped-head syndrome' induced by cobimetinib, 1 month after its introduction. The clinical presentation comprised interscapular pain, axial fatigue with cervical hypotonia, CPK elevation, intense fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in cervical muscles, and necrotizing myopathy was confirmed by muscle biopsy. Cobimetinib was temporarily discontinued, resulting in CPK normalization. Re-evaluation showed partial response, motivating continuation of combination therapy with a reduced dose of cobimetinib (40 mg/day). Because prescription of targeted therapies is likely to increase, this adverse event should be known.

Topics: Aged; Azetidines; Humans; Male; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Muscular Diseases; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms

Vemurafenib ha probado ser una herramienta útil en el tratamiento de melanoma metastásico con mutación BRAF-V600E. Los efectos adversos incluyen artralgias, fatiga y toxicidad cutánea, siendo infrecuente la paniculitis. Presentamos el caso de una paciente de 43 años con melanoma metastásico que desarrolla lesiones subcutáneas dolorosas en miembros inferiores y superiores, asociadas a clínica sistémica después de 2 semanas de inicio de tratamiento con Vemurafenib + Cobimetinib. La histología demostró paniculitis linfocitaria septal y lobulillar. La paciente tuvo mala tolerancia al tratamiento anti diana a dosis plenas, requiriendo su ajuste, generando una corticodependencia para controlar sintomatología, y que finalmente obligó a la descontinuación de la terapia dirigida contra melanoma.  A la fecha, se han descrito 29 casos en la literatura de paniculitis asociada a vemurafenib, siendo la mayoría paniculitis neutrofílicas con adecuado control de sintomatología asociando antiinflamatorios no esteroidales y/o corticoides orales sin requerir en su mayoría modificación de la terapia contra melanoma; sin embargo hay que tener presente que pueden haber casos con mala evolución que obligan a la reducción de dosis de vemurafenib y descontinuar el tratamiento, como ha ocurrido en nuestro reporte.Vemurafenib has proven to be a useful tool in the treatment of metastatic melanoma with BRAF-V600E mutation. Adverse effects include arthralgia, fatigue, and skin toxicity; panniculitis is a rare complication. We present the case of a 43-year-old patient with metastatic melanoma who developed painful subcutaneous nodules of the lower and upper limbs and associated systemic clinical symptoms after 2 weeks of treatment with vemurafenib plus cobimetinib. Histology showed a septal and lobular lymphocytic panniculitis.The patient had poor tolerance of the full-dose treatment, requiring its adjustment. Systemic corticosteroids were required to control symptomatology, which finally forced the discontinuation of the medication.To date, 29 cases have been described in the literature of panniculitis associated with vemurafenib. Most of these have been neutrophilic panniculitis, but adequate control of symptoms is usually achieved with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and/or oral corticosteroids without requiring modification of melanoma therapy. However, it must be borne in mind that there may be cases that force the reduction and discontinuation ofvemurafenib treatment. We beli

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Female; Humans; Indoles; Melanoma; Panniculitis; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Brain; Disease Progression; Humans; Indoles; Lymphatic Metastasis; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Melanoma; Piperidines; Posterior Leukoencephalopathy Syndrome; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Topics: Adult; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Humans; Iris Neoplasms; Male; Melanoma; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Remission Induction; Skin Neoplasms; Vemurafenib

Topics: Azetidines; Drug Interactions; Humans; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Neoplasm Metastasis; Piperidines; Skin Neoplasms; Survival Rate

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Piperidines; Pregnancy; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Risk Factors; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Azetidines; Central Serous Chorioretinopathy; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Piperidines; Recurrence; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Treatment Outcome; Vemurafenib

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Apoptosis; Azetidines; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Cell Line, Tumor; Cellular Senescence; Humans; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Cell Transformation, Neoplastic; Dermoscopy; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases; Nevus, Pigmented; Piperidines; Signal Transduction; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Topics: Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological; Azetidines; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Discovery; Drug Therapy, Combination; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Ipilimumab; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; MAP Kinase Kinase 2; Melanoma; Molecular Targeted Therapy; Neoplasm Metastasis; Nivolumab; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Medications in dermatology are used in a variety of different methods and dosages and for numerous different diseases entities that are not approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA); however, there are medications that have only recently hit the market that require our attention, as they are either FDA approved for the intended dermatologic use or could be effective in treating conditions that previously have been poorly managed.

Topics: Aminolevulinic Acid; Antibodies, Monoclonal; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized; Antineoplastic Agents; Arthritis, Psoriatic; Azetidines; Biphenyl Compounds; Carcinoma, Basal Cell; Cosmetic Techniques; Deoxycholic Acid; Dermatologic Agents; Drug Approval; Facial Dermatoses; Humans; Keratosis, Actinic; Melanoma; Oncolytic Virotherapy; Piperidines; Psoriasis; Pyridines; Scalp Dermatoses; Skin Neoplasms; United States; United States Food and Drug Administration

MEK inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical trials for treatment of different malignant neoplasms; trametinib dimethyl sulfoxide was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for melanoma in 2013. We present 3 cases of patients receiving MEK inhibitors who developed an atypical eruption.. Three patients who were receiving different MEK inhibitors (selumetinib, cobimetinib, and trametinib) developed an eruption, all associated with unique duskiness. Drug hypersensitivity was confirmed by histopathologic testing in 2 of the 3 cases. The skin eruption responded well to corticosteroids and did not recur when treatment with the MEK inhibitor was restarted in 2 of the patients.. The typical skin reaction associated with MEK inhibitors is a papulopustular eruption. To our knowledge, the dusky erythema that occurred in the 3 patients described here has not previously been reported for this drug class.

Topics: Adult; Azetidines; Benzimidazoles; Drug Eruptions; Erythema; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Kinases; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Skin Neoplasms

Topics: Azetidines; Female; Humans; Indoles; Male; Melanoma; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib

Eruptive melanocytic nevi (EMN) are characterized by the sudden onset of numerous melanocytic nevi and have been traditionally described in the setting of immunosuppression. Selective BRAF inhibitors such as vemurafenib cause multiple cutaneous adverse effects, including the formation of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma, as well as EMN. We describe the first reported case, to our knowledge, of involution of BRAF inhibitor-induced EMN following the concomitant addition of a MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib.. A woman in her 20s with a history of metastatic melanoma developed EMN while receiving therapy with vemurafenib, a selective BRAF inhibitor. After disease progression, the patient was placed on a clinical trial that combined vemurafenib with a MEK inhibitor, cobimetinib. Within months, we noted clinical involution of many of her EMN. In addition, numerous preexisting nevi were noted to fade in color on the dual regimen. Over a year after initiating this combination therapy, most of the patient's EMN were no longer clinically evident.. Our case report describing the involution of EMN supports data from previous clinical trials indicating that combination BRAF and MEK inhibition may reduce cutaneous proliferative effects that arise on BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. Further studies are necessary to characterize the biological mechanisms underlying this phenomenon.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Drug Interactions; Female; Humans; Indoles; MAP Kinase Kinase 1; Melanoma; Nevus, Pigmented; Piperidines; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib; Young Adult

BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitor (MEKi) frequently cause cutaneous adverse events.. We sought to investigate the cutaneous safety profile of BRAFi versus BRAFi and MEKi combination regimens.. We performed a retrospective cohort study, collecting data from 44 patients with melanoma treated either with BRAFi (vemurafenib or dabrafenib) or BRAFi and MEKi combination regimens (vemurafenib + cobimetinib or dabrafenib + trametinib). Patient characteristics, and the occurrence and severity of cutaneous adverse events, are described.. The development of cutaneous adverse events was significantly less frequent (P = .012) and occurred after longer treatment time (P = .025) in patients treated with BRAFi and MEKi combination regimen compared with patients treated with BRAFi monotherapy. Among patients who received both BRAFi and the combination of BRAFi and MEKi at different time points during their treatment course, the development of squamous cell carcinoma or keratoacanthoma was significantly less frequent when they received the combination regimen (P = .008). Patients receiving vemurafenib developed more cutaneous adverse events (P = .001) and in particular more photosensitivity (P = .010) than patients who did not.. There were a limited number of patients.. Combination regimen with BRAFi and MEKi shows fewer cutaneous adverse events and longer cutaneous adverse event-free interval compared with BRAFi monotherapy.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Azetidines; Carcinoma, Squamous Cell; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Imidazoles; Indoles; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Melanoma; Middle Aged; Oximes; Piperidines; Protein Kinase Inhibitors; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Pyridones; Pyrimidinones; Retrospective Studies; Skin Neoplasms; Sulfonamides; Vemurafenib; Young Adult