gatifloxacin has been researched along with Myocardial Infarction in 8 studies
Gatifloxacin: A fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent and DNA TOPOISOMERASE II inhibitor that is used as an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS.
gatifloxacin : A monocarboxylic acid that is 4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid which is substituted on the nitrogen by a cyclopropyl group and at positions 6, 7, and 8 by fluoro, 3-methylpiperazin-1-yl, and methoxy groups, respectively. Gatifloxacin is an antibiotic of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolone family, that like other members of that family, inhibits the bacterial topoisomerase type-II enzymes.
Myocardial Infarction: NECROSIS of the MYOCARDIUM caused by an obstruction of the blood supply to the heart (CORONARY CIRCULATION).
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"We evaluated relationships between the LDL cholesterol and CRP levels achieved after treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin or 40 mg of pravastatin per day and the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or death from coronary causes among 3745 patients with acute coronary syndromes." | 5.11 | C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. ( Braunwald, E; Cannon, CP; McCabe, CH; Morrow, D; Pfeffer, MA; Ridker, PM; Rifai, N; Rose, LM, 2005) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 8 (100.00) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 0 (0.00) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 0 (0.00) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Ridker, PM | 3 |
Cannon, CP | 5 |
Morrow, D | 1 |
Rifai, N | 2 |
Rose, LM | 2 |
McCabe, CH | 3 |
Pfeffer, MA | 1 |
Braunwald, E | 5 |
Grayston, JT | 1 |
Muhlestein, B | 1 |
Giugliano, RP | 1 |
Cairns, R | 2 |
Skene, AM | 1 |
Anderson, JL | 1 |
Morrow, DA | 2 |
Taylor-Robinson, D | 1 |
Boman, J | 1 |
Clearfield, M | 1 |
Mega, JL | 1 |
Murphy, S | 1 |
Belder, R | 1 |
Breen, J | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Phase 4 Study of the Effects of Pravastatin on Cholesterol Levels, Inflammation and Cognition in Schizophrenia[NCT01082588] | Phase 4 | 60 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2010-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) 180 mg Compared to Placebo Added to Background Lipid-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Elevated LDL-C Who Are Statin Intolerant[NCT02988115] | Phase 3 | 345 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2016-11-16 | Completed | ||
Statin Therapy With Atorvastatin in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT05076019] | 266 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-02-01 | Recruiting | |||
Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and the Influence of Statins - Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT05062239] | 100 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2022-04-01 | Recruiting | |||
[NCT00000617] | Phase 3 | 0 participants | Interventional | 1998-09-30 | Completed | ||
Effect of Methotrexate Carried by a Lipid Nanoemulsion on Left Ventricular Remodeling After ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction[NCT03516903] | Phase 2/Phase 3 | 35 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2018-04-17 | Terminated (stopped due to Due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With a second wave just beginning, and considering that we are testing an immunosuppressant in patients with high risk for COVID-19 complications, we would not be able to re-start recruitment safely in the near future.) | ||
Myocardial Adipose Inflammation and Pericardial Adipose Volume as Markers for Coronary Artery Disease In HIV Positive Patients[NCT02399384] | 12 participants (Anticipated) | Observational | 2015-01-14 | Completed | |||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | mg/L (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | 0.8063 |
Placebo | -0.5136 |
(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | mg/dl (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | -25.565 |
Placebo | -2.913 |
"The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition.~The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning." (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | 4.0417 |
Placebo | 4.125 |
This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 15-105. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | -5.625 |
Placebo | -3.76 |
This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | -0.83 |
Placebo | -0.28 |
This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | -2.9583 |
Placebo | -2.44 |
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a scale used to rate severity of schizophrenia. All items are summed to calculate the total score. The scale range is 30-210. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12
Intervention | Scores on a scale (Mean) |
---|---|
Pravastatin | -9.416 |
Placebo | -6.48 |
PCFB was calculated as the ([post-Baseline (BL) value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value ) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available, that single value was used as BL. PCFB in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment group and stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Bempedoic Acid | -22.58 |
Placebo | -1.17 |
Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline for hsCRP is defined as the last non-missing value on or prior to Day 1. Percent change from Baseline in hsCRP, non-parametric (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) analysis with Hodges-Lehmann estimates and confidence interval was performed. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Median) |
---|---|
Bempedoic Acid | -25.37 |
Placebo | 2.67 |
PCFB was calculated as the ([post-BL value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value ) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available then that single value was used as BL. PCFB in LDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group and stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) |
---|---|
Bempedoic Acid | -21.17 |
Placebo | -2.26 |
Change from Baseline is calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12; Week 24
Intervention | mg/dL (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
Week 12 | Week 24 | |
Bempedoic Acid | -39.3 | -37.0 |
Placebo | -3.1 | -5.1 |
PCFB was calculated as: ([post-BL value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available, that single value was used as BL. apoB and TC BL were defined as the last non-missing value on/prior to Day 1. PCFB was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment and group stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment (ST), missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking ST, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12
Intervention | percent change (Least Squares Mean) | ||
---|---|---|---|
non-HDL-C | TC | apoB | |
Bempedoic Acid | -18.08 | -15.37 | -14.65 |
Placebo | -0.14 | -0.61 | 0.32 |
4 trials available for gatifloxacin and Myocardial Infarction
Article | Year |
---|---|
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2005 |
Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after acute coronary syndrome.
Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlamydophila Infections; Ch | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, | 2005 |
Cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and cerebrovascular events following intensive and moderate statin therapy.
Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Epidemiologic Methods; Female | 2006 |
4 other studies available for gatifloxacin and Myocardial Infarction
Article | Year |
---|---|
Infection, antibiotics, and atherothrombosis--end of the road or new beginnings?
Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlamydophila Infect | 2005 |
The failure of antibiotics to prevent heart attacks.
Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chlamydophila Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Coronary Ar | 2005 |
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D | 2006 |
Design of the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT)-TIMI 22 trial.
Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anti-Infective Agents; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Chlamydophila Infec | 2002 |