Page last updated: 2024-11-04

gatifloxacin and Myocardial Infarction

gatifloxacin has been researched along with Myocardial Infarction in 8 studies

Gatifloxacin: A fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent and DNA TOPOISOMERASE II inhibitor that is used as an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS.
gatifloxacin : A monocarboxylic acid that is 4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid which is substituted on the nitrogen by a cyclopropyl group and at positions 6, 7, and 8 by fluoro, 3-methylpiperazin-1-yl, and methoxy groups, respectively. Gatifloxacin is an antibiotic of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolone family, that like other members of that family, inhibits the bacterial topoisomerase type-II enzymes.

Myocardial Infarction: NECROSIS of the MYOCARDIUM caused by an obstruction of the blood supply to the heart (CORONARY CIRCULATION).

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"We evaluated relationships between the LDL cholesterol and CRP levels achieved after treatment with 80 mg of atorvastatin or 40 mg of pravastatin per day and the risk of recurrent myocardial infarction or death from coronary causes among 3745 patients with acute coronary syndromes."5.11C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy. ( Braunwald, E; Cannon, CP; McCabe, CH; Morrow, D; Pfeffer, MA; Ridker, PM; Rifai, N; Rose, LM, 2005)

Research

Studies (8)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's8 (100.00)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ridker, PM3
Cannon, CP5
Morrow, D1
Rifai, N2
Rose, LM2
McCabe, CH3
Pfeffer, MA1
Braunwald, E5
Grayston, JT1
Muhlestein, B1
Giugliano, RP1
Cairns, R2
Skene, AM1
Anderson, JL1
Morrow, DA2
Taylor-Robinson, D1
Boman, J1
Clearfield, M1
Mega, JL1
Murphy, S1
Belder, R1
Breen, J1

Clinical Trials (7)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Phase 4 Study of the Effects of Pravastatin on Cholesterol Levels, Inflammation and Cognition in Schizophrenia[NCT01082588]Phase 460 participants (Actual)Interventional2010-06-30Completed
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid (ETC-1002) 180 mg Compared to Placebo Added to Background Lipid-Modifying Therapy in Patients With Elevated LDL-C Who Are Statin Intolerant[NCT02988115]Phase 3345 participants (Actual)Interventional2016-11-16Completed
Statin Therapy With Atorvastatin in Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement - a Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT05076019]266 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-02-01Recruiting
Post-Operative Atrial Fibrillation After Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement and the Influence of Statins - Randomized Controlled Trial[NCT05062239]100 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2022-04-01Recruiting
[NCT00000617]Phase 30 participants Interventional1998-09-30Completed
Effect of Methotrexate Carried by a Lipid Nanoemulsion on Left Ventricular Remodeling After ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction[NCT03516903]Phase 2/Phase 335 participants (Actual)Interventional2018-04-17Terminated (stopped due to Due to the COVID-19 pandemic. With a second wave just beginning, and considering that we are testing an immunosuppressant in patients with high risk for COVID-19 complications, we would not be able to re-start recruitment safely in the near future.)
Myocardial Adipose Inflammation and Pericardial Adipose Volume as Markers for Coronary Artery Disease In HIV Positive Patients[NCT02399384]12 participants (Anticipated)Observational2015-01-14Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) From Baseline to Week 12

(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

Interventionmg/L (Mean)
Pravastatin0.8063
Placebo-0.5136

Change in LDL-cholesterol Between Baseline and Week 12

(NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

Interventionmg/dl (Mean)
Pravastatin-25.565
Placebo-2.913

Change in MATRICS Neuropsychological Battery Composite Score From Baseline to Week 12

"The Measurement and Treatment Research to Improve Cognition in Schizophrenia (MATRICS) Consensus Cognitive Battery measures cognitive functioning within 7 domains: speed of processing, attention/vigilance, working memory (non verbal and verbal), verbal learning, visual learning, reasoning and problem solving and social cognition.~The composite score is calculated by the MATRICS computer program, which equally weights each of the 7 domain scores. The range of composite scores is 20-80. Higher scores indicate higher levels or cognitive functioning, while lower scores indicate lower levels of cognitive functioning." (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin4.0417
Placebo4.125

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) General Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 15-105. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-5.625
Placebo-3.76

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Negative Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-0.83
Placebo-0.28

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Positive Score From Baseline to Week 12

This is a subscale of the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The range for this subscale is 7-49. All items are summed to calculate the total score. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-2.9583
Placebo-2.44

Change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score From Baseline to Week 12

The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) is a scale used to rate severity of schizophrenia. All items are summed to calculate the total score. The scale range is 30-210. Better outcomes have lower numbers and worse outcomes have higher numbers. (NCT01082588)
Timeframe: Baseline, week 12

InterventionScores on a scale (Mean)
Pravastatin-9.416
Placebo-6.48

Percent Change From Baseline (PCFB) in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) at Week 12

PCFB was calculated as the ([post-Baseline (BL) value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value ) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available, that single value was used as BL. PCFB in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), with treatment group and stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Bempedoic Acid-22.58
Placebo-1.17

Percent Change From Baseline in High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hsCRP) at Week 12

Percent change from Baseline was calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value) x 100. Baseline for hsCRP is defined as the last non-missing value on or prior to Day 1. Percent change from Baseline in hsCRP, non-parametric (Wilcoxon rank-sum test) analysis with Hodges-Lehmann estimates and confidence interval was performed. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

Interventionpercent change (Median)
Bempedoic Acid-25.37
Placebo2.67

Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 24

PCFB was calculated as the ([post-BL value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value ) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available then that single value was used as BL. PCFB in LDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment group and stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking study treatment, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 24

Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
Bempedoic Acid-21.17
Placebo-2.26

Absolute Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12 and Week 24

Change from Baseline is calculated as the ([post-Baseline value minus the Baseline value] divided by the Baseline value ) x 100. Baseline is defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12; Week 24

,
Interventionmg/dL (Mean)
Week 12Week 24
Bempedoic Acid-39.3-37.0
Placebo-3.1-5.1

Percent Change From Baseline in the Lipid Profile at Week 12

PCFB was calculated as: ([post-BL value minus the BL value] divided by the BL value) x 100. BL was defined as the mean of the last two non-missing values on or prior to Day 1. If only one value was available, that single value was used as BL. apoB and TC BL were defined as the last non-missing value on/prior to Day 1. PCFB was analyzed using ANCOVA, with treatment and group stratification factor (primary prevention; secondary prevention) as fixed effects and BL as a covariate. For participants with missing data at Week 12 who were no longer taking study treatment (ST), missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including stratification and BL data from placebo participants only. In this imputation model, treatment group was not included. For participants with missing lipid data at Week 12 who were still taking ST, missing values were imputed using multiple imputation via a regression-based model including treatment, stratification and BL value. (NCT02988115)
Timeframe: Baseline; Week 12

,
Interventionpercent change (Least Squares Mean)
non-HDL-CTCapoB
Bempedoic Acid-18.08-15.37-14.65
Placebo-0.14-0.610.32

Trials

4 trials available for gatifloxacin and Myocardial Infarction

ArticleYear
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Jan-06, Volume: 352, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2005
Antibiotic treatment of Chlamydia pneumoniae after acute coronary syndrome.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Apr-21, Volume: 352, Issue:16

    Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlamydophila Infections; Ch

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Relative efficacy of atorvastatin 80 mg and pravastatin 40 mg in achieving the dual goals of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol <70 mg/dl and C-reactive protein <2 mg/l: an analysis of the PROVE-IT TIMI-22 trial.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol,

2005
Cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and cerebrovascular events following intensive and moderate statin therapy.
    Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2006, Volume: 22, Issue:1

    Topics: Aged; Angina, Unstable; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Epidemiologic Methods; Female

2006

Other Studies

4 other studies available for gatifloxacin and Myocardial Infarction

ArticleYear
Infection, antibiotics, and atherothrombosis--end of the road or new beginnings?
    The New England journal of medicine, 2005, Apr-21, Volume: 352, Issue:16

    Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chlamydophila Infect

2005
The failure of antibiotics to prevent heart attacks.
    BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2005, Aug-13, Volume: 331, Issue:7513

    Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Azithromycin; Chlamydophila Infections; Chlamydophila pneumoniae; Coronary Ar

2005
C-reactive protein levels and outcomes after statin therapy.
    Current atherosclerosis reports, 2006, Volume: 8, Issue:1

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary D

2006
Design of the Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT)-TIMI 22 trial.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2002, Apr-01, Volume: 89, Issue:7

    Topics: Angina, Unstable; Anti-Infective Agents; Anticholesteremic Agents; Atorvastatin; Chlamydophila Infec

2002