gatifloxacin has been researched along with Endophthalmitis in 32 studies
Gatifloxacin: A fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent and DNA TOPOISOMERASE II inhibitor that is used as an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS.
gatifloxacin : A monocarboxylic acid that is 4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid which is substituted on the nitrogen by a cyclopropyl group and at positions 6, 7, and 8 by fluoro, 3-methylpiperazin-1-yl, and methoxy groups, respectively. Gatifloxacin is an antibiotic of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolone family, that like other members of that family, inhibits the bacterial topoisomerase type-II enzymes.
Endophthalmitis: Suppurative inflammation of the tissues of the internal structures of the eye frequently associated with an infection.
Excerpt | Relevance | Reference |
---|---|---|
"Besifloxacin is as effective as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in a rabbit model for topical prophylaxis and treatment of PRSP-induced endophthalmitis." | 7.76 | Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis. ( Hesje, CK; Marquart, ME; Moore, Q; Norcross, EW; Sanders, ME; Sanfilippo, CM; Shafiee, A, 2010) |
"3% gatifloxacin drops to prevent endophthalmitis in a rabbit model." | 7.73 | Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model. ( Bartholomew, LR; de Castro, LE; Sandoval, HP; Solomon, KD; Vroman, DT, 2006) |
"To study the use of prophylactic fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, and bacterial sensitivity in cases of acute postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery." | 7.73 | Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. ( Deramo, VA; Fastenberg, DM; Lai, JC; Udell, IJ, 2006) |
"Moxifloxacin, given in the same dosage, penetrated the aqueous humour better then gatifloxacin during cataract surgery." | 5.15 | Aqueous humour penetration of moxifloxocin and gatifloxacin eye drops in different dosing regimens before phacoemulsification surgery. ( Akova, YA; Babaoğlu, MÖ; Bozkurt, A; Çetinkaya, A; Çolak, M; Güngör, SG; Yasar, Ü, 2011) |
" A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following search terms: moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin; levofloxacin; minimum inhibitory concentration or prevention or prophylaxis; keratitis or endophthalmitis." | 4.84 | Review of third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy. ( Scoper, SV, 2008) |
"Besifloxacin is as effective as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in a rabbit model for topical prophylaxis and treatment of PRSP-induced endophthalmitis." | 3.76 | Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis. ( Hesje, CK; Marquart, ME; Moore, Q; Norcross, EW; Sanders, ME; Sanfilippo, CM; Shafiee, A, 2010) |
"Vitreous penetration of single-dose (400 mg) oral gatifloxacin was evaluated in patients (n = 33) undergoing vitreous tap during the standard procedure for intravitreal antibiotic injection for acute postoperative endophthalmitis at various time-points." | 3.75 | Evaluation of vitreous levels of gatifloxacin after systemic administration in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes. ( Azad, RV; Kumar, A; Satpathy, G; Sharma, YR; Srinivas, A; Velpandian, T, 2009) |
"To investigate the safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin in a rabbit model as prophylaxis against endophthalmitis." | 3.75 | Safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin on corneal endothelial structure and viability. ( Choi, JA; Chung, SK, 2009) |
"To compare pharmacodynamic indices and minimal inhibitory concentrations for vancomycin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and combined quinupristin and dalfopristin for historic and current human coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) endophthalmitis isolates." | 3.74 | In vitro efficacy and pharmacodynamic indices for antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococcus endophthalmitis isolates. ( Flynn, HW; Harper, T; Miller, D, 2007) |
"3% gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution in preventing bacterial endophthalmitis in rabbits." | 3.74 | Prophylactic efficacy of ophthalmic quinolones in experimental endophthalmitis in rabbits. ( Kozai, S; Ohashi, Y; Sakaki, H; Suzuki, T; Tajika, T; Wada, T, 2008) |
"Topical therapy with gatifloxacin before and after intraocular bacteria challenge led to lower incidences of endophthalmitis in rabbits." | 3.74 | Prevention of endophthalmitis by collagen shields presoaked in fourth-generation fluoroquinolones versus by topical prophylaxis. ( Haugen, B; Haymore, J; Kleinmann, G; Mamalis, N; Olson, RJ; Romaniv, N; Werner, L, 2008) |
"3% gatifloxacin drops to prevent endophthalmitis in a rabbit model." | 3.73 | Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model. ( Bartholomew, LR; de Castro, LE; Sandoval, HP; Solomon, KD; Vroman, DT, 2006) |
"To study the use of prophylactic fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, and bacterial sensitivity in cases of acute postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery." | 3.73 | Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. ( Deramo, VA; Fastenberg, DM; Lai, JC; Udell, IJ, 2006) |
"The intraocular pressure was slightly higher in Group II (p<0." | 2.78 | Efficacy and tolerability of a gatifloxacin/prednisolone acetate fixed combination for topical prophylaxis and control of inflammation in phacoemulsification: a 20-day-double-blind comparison to its individual components. ( Avakian, A; Brasil, A; Cunha, PA; Shinzato, FA; Tecchio, GT; Weber, SL, 2013) |
"Bacterial endophthalmitis is a potential complication of ICL implantation." | 1.35 | Culture-positive endophthalmitis after implantation of intraocular Collamer lens. ( Cohen, JA; Davis, MJ; Dennis, RF; Epstein, RJ, 2009) |
"A low rate of endophthalmitis is achievable using a standardized procedure for intravitreal injection without prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis on the days prior to the injection." | 1.34 | The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials. ( Bhavsar, AR; Glassman, AR; Ip, MS, 2007) |
Timeframe | Studies, this research(%) | All Research% |
---|---|---|
pre-1990 | 0 (0.00) | 18.7374 |
1990's | 0 (0.00) | 18.2507 |
2000's | 23 (71.88) | 29.6817 |
2010's | 7 (21.88) | 24.3611 |
2020's | 2 (6.25) | 2.80 |
Authors | Studies |
---|---|
Ongkasin, K | 1 |
Masmoudi, Y | 1 |
Tassaing, T | 1 |
Le-Bourdon, G | 1 |
Badens, E | 1 |
Kim, S | 1 |
Bispo, PJM | 1 |
Tanner, EEL | 1 |
Mitragotri, S | 1 |
E Silva, RN | 1 |
Gipson, I | 1 |
Chodosh, J | 1 |
Behlau, I | 1 |
Paschalis, EI | 1 |
Gilmore, MS | 1 |
Dohlman, CH | 1 |
Cunha, PA | 1 |
Shinzato, FA | 1 |
Tecchio, GT | 1 |
Weber, SL | 1 |
Brasil, A | 1 |
Avakian, A | 1 |
Kletke, SN | 1 |
Brissette, AR | 1 |
Gale, J | 1 |
Elia, M | 1 |
Khodadadeh, S | 1 |
Chow, J | 1 |
Jensen, MK | 1 |
Fiscella, RG | 1 |
Moshirfar, M | 2 |
Mooney, B | 1 |
O'Callaghan, R | 1 |
Ohnsman, C | 1 |
Song, J | 1 |
Scoper, SV | 1 |
Tsuchiya, Y | 1 |
Kobayakawa, S | 1 |
Tsuji, A | 1 |
Tochikubo, T | 1 |
Lindstrom, RL | 1 |
Holland, EJ | 1 |
Lane, SS | 1 |
McCulley, JP | 1 |
Callegan, MC | 2 |
Novosad, BD | 2 |
Ramadan, RT | 1 |
Wiskur, B | 1 |
Moyer, AL | 1 |
Betanzos-Cabrera, G | 1 |
Juárez-Verdayes, MA | 1 |
González-González, G | 1 |
Cancino-Díaz, ME | 1 |
Cancino-Díaz, JC | 1 |
Moss, JM | 1 |
Sanislo, SR | 1 |
Ta, CN | 1 |
Srinivas, A | 1 |
Azad, RV | 1 |
Sharma, YR | 1 |
Kumar, A | 1 |
Satpathy, G | 1 |
Velpandian, T | 1 |
Davis, MJ | 1 |
Epstein, RJ | 1 |
Dennis, RF | 1 |
Cohen, JA | 1 |
Choi, JA | 1 |
Chung, SK | 1 |
Awotesu, S | 1 |
Eke, T | 1 |
Norcross, EW | 1 |
Sanders, ME | 1 |
Moore, Q | 1 |
Sanfilippo, CM | 1 |
Hesje, CK | 1 |
Shafiee, A | 1 |
Marquart, ME | 1 |
Güngör, SG | 1 |
Akova, YA | 1 |
Bozkurt, A | 1 |
Yasar, Ü | 1 |
Babaoğlu, MÖ | 1 |
Çetinkaya, A | 1 |
Çolak, M | 1 |
Bellini, LP | 1 |
Martins, GM | 1 |
Bulla, MC | 1 |
Fuller, JJ | 1 |
Marcus, DM | 1 |
de Castro, LE | 1 |
Sandoval, HP | 1 |
Bartholomew, LR | 1 |
Vroman, DT | 1 |
Solomon, KD | 1 |
Deramo, VA | 1 |
Lai, JC | 1 |
Fastenberg, DM | 1 |
Udell, IJ | 1 |
Feiz, V | 1 |
Vitale, AT | 1 |
Wegelin, JA | 1 |
Basavanthappa, S | 1 |
Wolsey, DH | 1 |
Harper, T | 1 |
Miller, D | 1 |
Flynn, HW | 1 |
Bhavsar, AR | 1 |
Ip, MS | 1 |
Glassman, AR | 1 |
Bohigian, GM | 1 |
Wiskur, BJ | 1 |
Robinson, ML | 1 |
Farrand, AJ | 1 |
Wada, T | 1 |
Kozai, S | 1 |
Tajika, T | 1 |
Sakaki, H | 1 |
Suzuki, T | 1 |
Ohashi, Y | 1 |
Haugen, B | 1 |
Werner, L | 1 |
Romaniv, N | 1 |
Haymore, J | 1 |
Kleinmann, G | 1 |
Mamalis, N | 1 |
Olson, RJ | 1 |
Mather, R | 1 |
Karenchak, LM | 1 |
Romanowski, EG | 1 |
Kowalski, RP | 1 |
Trial | Phase | Enrollment | Study Type | Start Date | Status | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Intracameral Levofloxacin (0.5%) Versus Intracameral Cefuroxime (1mg/0.1ml) Effect on Corneal Endothelial Cell Count and Morphology in Uneventful Phacoemulsification[NCT04212078] | Phase 1/Phase 2 | 138 participants (Anticipated) | Interventional | 2019-07-29 | Recruiting | ||
The Effects on Betadine 5% Penetration When Using Lidocaine 2% Jelly Versus Topical Tetracaine 0.5% for Topical Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.[NCT00827073] | 40 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2008-11-30 | Completed | |||
A Phase 2 Evaluation of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: Bevacizumab (Avastin)[NCT00336323] | Phase 2 | 121 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2006-06-30 | Completed | ||
A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema[NCT00367133] | Phase 3 | 840 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-07-31 | Completed | ||
The Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study: Two Randomized Trials to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Injection(s) of Triamcinolone Acetonide With Standard Care to Treat Macular Edema[NCT00105027] | Phase 3 | 682 participants (Actual) | Interventional | 2004-10-31 | Completed | ||
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024] |
Within 3 hours from time of culture acquisition, the samples will be vortexed for 30 seconds and 100µl aliquots will be plated onto 5% sheep blood and chocolate agar plates. These plates will be incubated with 5% carbon dioxide at 35˚ C for 72 hours. After 72 hours all plates will be read for colony count and identification of all isolates will be performed using routine microbiological methods. The natural log of bacterial bacterial colony count will be used for the outcome measure. (NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab, and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)
Intervention | Ln(bacterial colony count) (Mean) |
---|---|
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop | -0.14 |
Lidocaine 2% Jelly | -0.52 |
(NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)
Intervention | bacterial spceies (Mean) | |
---|---|---|
pre number of bacterial spices | post surgery number of bacterial speices | |
Lidocaine 2% Jelly | 1 | 1 |
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop | 1 | 1 |
Change in central subfield retinal thickness from baseline measured on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT images were obtained at each visit following pupil dilation by a certified operator using the OCT3 machine (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Scans were 6 mm length and included the 6 radial line pattern for quantitative measures and the cross hair pattern (6-12 to 9-3 o'clock) for qualitative assessment of retinal morphology. The OCT scans were sent to the DRCR.net Reading Center for grading. Negative changes represent a decrease in retinal thickening. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | 9 Weeks | 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | -35 | -35 | -74 | -56 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only | -3 | -17 | 5 | -5 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w | -13 | -20 | -48 | -40 |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | -86 | -42 | -56 | -47 |
Laser at Baseline | 21 | -40 | -53 | -40 |
The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 0 | 4 | 3 |
The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 0 | 2 | 0 |
The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 1 | 6 | 2 |
The 1.25mg Bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Duration of effect of Bevacizumab was based on additional improvement versus maintained improvement versus worsening within 3 to 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in the DRCR.net paper, Reproducibility of macular thickness and volume using Zeiss optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema.Ophthalmology 2007;114:1520-25. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | |
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups | 1 | 11 | 2 |
The 1.25mg bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The pooled 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | |
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups | 1 | 1 | 0 |
The 1.25mg bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The pooled 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | |
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups | 2 | 16 | 4 |
The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks
Intervention | Participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 0 | 9 | 4 |
The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks | |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 0 | 9 | 1 |
The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 0 | 2 | 1 |
The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 2 | 14 | 1 |
The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | ||
---|---|---|---|
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | Within ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | >11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks | |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
≤66 years | >66 years | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -45 | -16 |
Pooled Bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
<400 microns | ≥400 microns | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -3 | -102 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
<65 letters | ≥65 letters | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -35 | -28 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Typical/Predominantly Focal | Neither Predominantly Focal or Diffuse | Typical/Predominantly Diffuse | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -13 | -8 | -82 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Female | Male | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -28 | -35 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
No | Yes | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -40 | -29 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks + laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. Retinopathy severity based on investigator discretion on clinical examination. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe NPDR | | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -31 | -31 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | microns (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Definite/Questionable | No Evidence | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | -35 | -29 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
≤66 years | >66 years | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 4 | 2 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
<400 microns | ≥400 microns | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 1 | 5 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Typical/Predominantly Focal | Neither Predominantly Focal or Diffuse | Typical/Predominantly Diffuse | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 7 | 0 | 3 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Female | Male | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 3 | 3 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
No | Yes | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 5 | 2 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe NPDR | | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 3 | 1 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
Definite/Questionable | No Evidence | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 6 | 1 |
Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |
---|---|---|
<65 letters | ≥65 letters | |
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups | 3 | 1 |
Change in visual acuity letter score as measured using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the electronic Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study(E-ETDRS) technique. At baseline and at each follow up visit, best corrected visual acuity was measured at 3 meters by a certified tester using an electronic procedure based on the E-ETDRS method. Letter score best value = 97 and worst value = 0; positive change represents an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks
Intervention | letters (Median) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | 9 Weeks | 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only | 2 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w | 0 | 0 | -2 | 0 |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 6 | 6 | 8 | 7 |
Laser at Baseline | -2 | 1 | 3 | -1 |
Visual acuity letter score as measured using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the electronic Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study(E-ETDRS) technique. At baseline and at each follow up visit, best corrected visual acuity was measured at 3 meters by a certified tester using an electronic procedure based on the E-ETDRS method. Letter score best value = 97 and worst value = 0; an increase in a letter score by 10 is considered clinically significant. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks
Intervention | participants (Number) | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
≥ 10 letter improvement at 3 Weeks | ≥ 10 letters worse at 3 Weeks | ≥ 10 letter improvement at 6 Weeks | ≥ 10 letters worse at 6 Weeks | ≥ 10 letter improvement at 9 Weeks | ≥ 10 letters worse at 9 Weeks | ≥ 10 letter improvement at 12 Weeks | ≥ 10 letters worse at 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 4 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 7 | 1 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w | 2 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 4 | 0 | 7 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 0 |
Laser at Baseline | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 |
Central subfield retinal thickness measured on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT images were obtained at each visit following pupil dilation by a certified operator using the OCT3 machine (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Scans were 6 mm length and included the 6 radial line pattern for quantitative measures and the cross hair pattern (6-12 to 9-3 o'clock) for qualitative assessment of retinal morphology. The OCT scans were sent to the DRCR.net Reading Center for grading. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 Weeks
Intervention | percentage of participants (Number) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
3 Weeks | 6 Weeks | 9 Weeks | 12 Weeks | |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks | 37 | 30 | 38 | 33 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only | 10 | 19 | 10 | 14 |
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w | 25 | 25 | 37 | 25 |
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks | 38 | 22 | 22 | 33 |
Laser at Baseline | 11 | 17 | 19 | 21 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 2 Years
Intervention | Percentage of Eyes (Number) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 53 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 34 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 38 |
Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 2 Years
Intervention | Microns (Median) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 243 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 305 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 279 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 3 years
Intervention | Microns (Median) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 211 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 269 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 248 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 years
Intervention | Microns (Mean) | Microns (Median) |
---|---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | -175 | |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -124 | |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -126 | |
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | -158 | |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -103 | |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -114 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years
Intervention | Letter score (Mean) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 1 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -2 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -3 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 year
Intervention | Letter Score (Mean) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 5 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 0 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 0 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0 (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 year
Intervention | Letter Score (Median) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 8 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 2 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 4 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 years
Intervention | Microns (Mean) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | -139 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -86 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -77 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years
Intervention | Microns (Median) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | -131 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -74 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | -76 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years
Intervention | Letter score (Median) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 4 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 1 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 2 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years
Intervention | Percentage of Eyes (Number) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 67 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 46 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 48 |
Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 years
Intervention | Percentage of Eyes (Number) |
---|---|
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 68 |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 43 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 51 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: baseline to 2 years
Intervention | Percentage of Eyes (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>= 15 letter improvement | 14 to 10 letter improvement | 9 to 5 letter improvement | same +- 4 letters | 5-9 letters worse | 10-14 letters worse | >=15 letters worse | |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 14 | 11 | 14 | 27 | 9 | 6 | 20 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 17 | 11 | 15 | 23 | 6 | 8 | 20 |
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 18 | 13 | 16 | 24 | 10 | 5 | 14 |
Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0 (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 years
Intervention | Percentage of Eyes (Number) | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
>= 15 letters better | 10-14 letters better | 5-9 letters better | no change, + - 4 letters | 5-9 letters worse | 10-14 letters worse | >=15 letters worse | |
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 20 | 4 | 17 | 23 | 10 | 9 | 17 |
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone | 21 | 16 | 9 | 24 | 6 | 6 | 16 |
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation | 26 | 18 | 18 | 21 | 4 | 4 | 8 |
(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | letters read (Mean) |
---|---|
CRVO Observation | -12.1 |
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -1.2 |
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -1.2 |
BRVO Standard Care | 4.2 |
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 5.7 |
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 4.0 |
(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | um (Median) |
---|---|
CRVO Observation | -277 |
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -196 |
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -261 |
BRVO Standard Care | -224 |
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -149 |
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | -170 |
Visual acuity testing was done using electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity testing at 3 meters using the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester by a SCORE certified technician. A masked visual acuity examiner with no knowledge of treatment assignments performed visual acuity testing at the 4-month, 12-month, 24-month and 36-month visits. An E-ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20, and a score of 20 letters is approximately 20/400. A visual acuity letter score change of 15 is about three lines on a vision chart. (NCT00105027)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 months
Intervention | Participants (Number) |
---|---|
CRVO Observation | 5 |
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 22 |
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 21 |
BRVO Standard Care | 35 |
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 31 |
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 34 |
(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months
Intervention | events (Number) | ||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Initiation of IOP-lowering medications | IOP > 35 mm HG | IOP > 10 mm HG above baseline | Laser peripheral iridotomy | Trabeculectomy | Tube shunt | Cataract: lens opacity onset or progression | Cataract surgery | Infectious endophthalmitis | Noninfectious endophthalmitis | Retinal detachment | Iris neovascularization | Retinal neovascularization | Vitreous hemorrhage | YAG capsulotomy | Sector or panretinal photocagulation | Pars plana vitrectomy | |
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 11 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 57 | 14 | 50 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 38 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
BRVO Standard Care | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 18 | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 9 | 2 |
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide | 32 | 8 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 |
CRVO Observation | 7 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 1 |
1 review available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Review of third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroquinolones; Ga | 2008 |
3 trials available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Efficacy and tolerability of a gatifloxacin/prednisolone acetate fixed combination for topical prophylaxis and control of inflammation in phacoemulsification: a 20-day-double-blind comparison to its individual components.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Double-Blind Method | 2013 |
A prospective randomized evaluation of topical gatifloxacin on conjunctival flora in patients undergoing intravitreal injections.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteria; Colony Cou | 2009 |
Aqueous humour penetration of moxifloxocin and gatifloxacin eye drops in different dosing regimens before phacoemulsification surgery.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Aqueous Humor; Aza Compounds; Cataract; Chromatography, High Pressure L | 2011 |
28 other studies available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis
Article | Year |
---|---|
Supercritical loading of gatifloxacin into hydrophobic foldable intraocular lenses - Process control and optimization by following in situ CO
Topics: Carbon Dioxide; Drug Compounding; Drug Delivery Systems; Endophthalmitis; Gatifloxacin; Humans; Hydr | 2020 |
The Search for Antifungal Prophylaxis After Artificial Corneal Surgery-An In Vitro Study.
Topics: Animals; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antifungal Agents; Aspergillus fumigatus; Benzalkonium Compounds; C | 2020 |
Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis caused by Pantoea species: a case report.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endophthalmit | 2014 |
Corneal crystalline deposits associated with topically applied gatifloxacin.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cataract Extraction; Corneal Diseases; Corneal Strom | 2014 |
Third- and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: retrospective comparison of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed over 10 years.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprof | 2008 |
Laboratory data and statistical evidence in fluoroquinolone study.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Collagen; Colony Count, M | 2008 |
Preventive effect against post-cataract endophthalmitis: drug delivery intraocular lens versus intracameral antibiotics.
Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aqueous Humor; Biological Availability; Cataract E | 2008 |
Fluoroquinolones and postoperative endophthalmitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprofloxacin; Endophthalmitis; Eye In | 2009 |
Fluoroquinolones and postoperative endophthalmitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprofloxacin; Endophthalmitis; Eye In | 2009 |
Rate of bacterial eradication by ophthalmic solutions of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Benzalkonium Compounds; Colony Count, Microbial; Drug Evaluati | 2009 |
Gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and balofloxacin resistance due to mutations in the gyrA and parC genes of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from patients with endophthalmitis, corneal ulcers and conjunctivitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Conjunctivitis; Corneal Ulcer; DNA Gyrase; DNA Topoisomerase I | 2009 |
Evaluation of vitreous levels of gatifloxacin after systemic administration in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes.
Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Infective Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endophthalmitis; Fema | 2009 |
Culture-positive endophthalmitis after implantation of intraocular Collamer lens.
Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endophthalmitis; Eye Infections, Bacterial; | 2009 |
Safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin on corneal endothelial structure and viability.
Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Cell Survival; Endophthalmitis; Endothelium, Corne | 2009 |
Preoperative lidocaine gel.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteria; Colony Count, Microbia | 2010 |
Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Azepines; Colony Count, Micr | 2010 |
Preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgeries.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Cataract Extraction; Endophthalm | 2011 |
Vitreous and aqueous penetration of orally administered gatifloxacin in humans.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aqueous Humor; Biological Availability; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroquinolones; Ga | 2004 |
Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Disease Models, Ani | 2006 |
Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin.
Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds | 2006 |
Endophthalmitis after uncomplicated cataract surgery with the use of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: a retrospective observational case series.
Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Bacter | 2007 |
In vitro efficacy and pharmacodynamic indices for antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococcus endophthalmitis isolates.
Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aqueous Humor; Aza | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui | 2007 |
Endophthalmitis.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Bacteria; Endophthalmitis; Eye Infecti | 2008 |
Toward improving therapeutic regimens for Bacillus endophthalmitis.
Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacillus cereus; Biological Availability; Dexamethasone; Disease Mod | 2008 |
Prophylactic efficacy of ophthalmic quinolones in experimental endophthalmitis in rabbits.
Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biological Availability; Disease Progression; Endo | 2008 |
Prevention of endophthalmitis by collagen shields presoaked in fourth-generation fluoroquinolones versus by topical prophylaxis.
Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Collagen; Colony Count, M | 2008 |
Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics.
Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Bacteria; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Endophtha | 2002 |