Page last updated: 2024-11-04

gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis

gatifloxacin has been researched along with Endophthalmitis in 32 studies

Gatifloxacin: A fluoroquinolone antibacterial agent and DNA TOPOISOMERASE II inhibitor that is used as an ophthalmic solution for the treatment of BACTERIAL CONJUNCTIVITIS.
gatifloxacin : A monocarboxylic acid that is 4-oxo-1,4-dihydroquinoline-3-carboxylic acid which is substituted on the nitrogen by a cyclopropyl group and at positions 6, 7, and 8 by fluoro, 3-methylpiperazin-1-yl, and methoxy groups, respectively. Gatifloxacin is an antibiotic of the fourth-generation fluoroquinolone family, that like other members of that family, inhibits the bacterial topoisomerase type-II enzymes.

Endophthalmitis: Suppurative inflammation of the tissues of the internal structures of the eye frequently associated with an infection.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Besifloxacin is as effective as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in a rabbit model for topical prophylaxis and treatment of PRSP-induced endophthalmitis."7.76Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis. ( Hesje, CK; Marquart, ME; Moore, Q; Norcross, EW; Sanders, ME; Sanfilippo, CM; Shafiee, A, 2010)
"3% gatifloxacin drops to prevent endophthalmitis in a rabbit model."7.73Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model. ( Bartholomew, LR; de Castro, LE; Sandoval, HP; Solomon, KD; Vroman, DT, 2006)
"To study the use of prophylactic fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, and bacterial sensitivity in cases of acute postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery."7.73Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. ( Deramo, VA; Fastenberg, DM; Lai, JC; Udell, IJ, 2006)
"Moxifloxacin, given in the same dosage, penetrated the aqueous humour better then gatifloxacin during cataract surgery."5.15Aqueous humour penetration of moxifloxocin and gatifloxacin eye drops in different dosing regimens before phacoemulsification surgery. ( Akova, YA; Babaoğlu, MÖ; Bozkurt, A; Çetinkaya, A; Çolak, M; Güngör, SG; Yasar, Ü, 2011)
" A MEDLINE search was conducted using the following search terms: moxifloxacin or gatifloxacin; levofloxacin; minimum inhibitory concentration or prevention or prophylaxis; keratitis or endophthalmitis."4.84Review of third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy. ( Scoper, SV, 2008)
"Besifloxacin is as effective as moxifloxacin and gatifloxacin in a rabbit model for topical prophylaxis and treatment of PRSP-induced endophthalmitis."3.76Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis. ( Hesje, CK; Marquart, ME; Moore, Q; Norcross, EW; Sanders, ME; Sanfilippo, CM; Shafiee, A, 2010)
"Vitreous penetration of single-dose (400 mg) oral gatifloxacin was evaluated in patients (n = 33) undergoing vitreous tap during the standard procedure for intravitreal antibiotic injection for acute postoperative endophthalmitis at various time-points."3.75Evaluation of vitreous levels of gatifloxacin after systemic administration in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes. ( Azad, RV; Kumar, A; Satpathy, G; Sharma, YR; Srinivas, A; Velpandian, T, 2009)
"To investigate the safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin in a rabbit model as prophylaxis against endophthalmitis."3.75Safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin on corneal endothelial structure and viability. ( Choi, JA; Chung, SK, 2009)
"To compare pharmacodynamic indices and minimal inhibitory concentrations for vancomycin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, linezolid, and combined quinupristin and dalfopristin for historic and current human coagulase-negative staphylococcus (CoNS) endophthalmitis isolates."3.74In vitro efficacy and pharmacodynamic indices for antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococcus endophthalmitis isolates. ( Flynn, HW; Harper, T; Miller, D, 2007)
"3% gatifloxacin ophthalmic solution in preventing bacterial endophthalmitis in rabbits."3.74Prophylactic efficacy of ophthalmic quinolones in experimental endophthalmitis in rabbits. ( Kozai, S; Ohashi, Y; Sakaki, H; Suzuki, T; Tajika, T; Wada, T, 2008)
"Topical therapy with gatifloxacin before and after intraocular bacteria challenge led to lower incidences of endophthalmitis in rabbits."3.74Prevention of endophthalmitis by collagen shields presoaked in fourth-generation fluoroquinolones versus by topical prophylaxis. ( Haugen, B; Haymore, J; Kleinmann, G; Mamalis, N; Olson, RJ; Romaniv, N; Werner, L, 2008)
"3% gatifloxacin drops to prevent endophthalmitis in a rabbit model."3.73Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model. ( Bartholomew, LR; de Castro, LE; Sandoval, HP; Solomon, KD; Vroman, DT, 2006)
"To study the use of prophylactic fourth-generation fluoroquinolone antibiotics, gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin, and bacterial sensitivity in cases of acute postoperative endophthalmitis following cataract surgery."3.73Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin. ( Deramo, VA; Fastenberg, DM; Lai, JC; Udell, IJ, 2006)
"The intraocular pressure was slightly higher in Group II (p<0."2.78Efficacy and tolerability of a gatifloxacin/prednisolone acetate fixed combination for topical prophylaxis and control of inflammation in phacoemulsification: a 20-day-double-blind comparison to its individual components. ( Avakian, A; Brasil, A; Cunha, PA; Shinzato, FA; Tecchio, GT; Weber, SL, 2013)
"Bacterial endophthalmitis is a potential complication of ICL implantation."1.35Culture-positive endophthalmitis after implantation of intraocular Collamer lens. ( Cohen, JA; Davis, MJ; Dennis, RF; Epstein, RJ, 2009)
"A low rate of endophthalmitis is achievable using a standardized procedure for intravitreal injection without prescribing antibiotic prophylaxis on the days prior to the injection."1.34The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials. ( Bhavsar, AR; Glassman, AR; Ip, MS, 2007)

Research

Studies (32)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19900 (0.00)18.7374
1990's0 (0.00)18.2507
2000's23 (71.88)29.6817
2010's7 (21.88)24.3611
2020's2 (6.25)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Ongkasin, K1
Masmoudi, Y1
Tassaing, T1
Le-Bourdon, G1
Badens, E1
Kim, S1
Bispo, PJM1
Tanner, EEL1
Mitragotri, S1
E Silva, RN1
Gipson, I1
Chodosh, J1
Behlau, I1
Paschalis, EI1
Gilmore, MS1
Dohlman, CH1
Cunha, PA1
Shinzato, FA1
Tecchio, GT1
Weber, SL1
Brasil, A1
Avakian, A1
Kletke, SN1
Brissette, AR1
Gale, J1
Elia, M1
Khodadadeh, S1
Chow, J1
Jensen, MK1
Fiscella, RG1
Moshirfar, M2
Mooney, B1
O'Callaghan, R1
Ohnsman, C1
Song, J1
Scoper, SV1
Tsuchiya, Y1
Kobayakawa, S1
Tsuji, A1
Tochikubo, T1
Lindstrom, RL1
Holland, EJ1
Lane, SS1
McCulley, JP1
Callegan, MC2
Novosad, BD2
Ramadan, RT1
Wiskur, B1
Moyer, AL1
Betanzos-Cabrera, G1
Juárez-Verdayes, MA1
González-González, G1
Cancino-Díaz, ME1
Cancino-Díaz, JC1
Moss, JM1
Sanislo, SR1
Ta, CN1
Srinivas, A1
Azad, RV1
Sharma, YR1
Kumar, A1
Satpathy, G1
Velpandian, T1
Davis, MJ1
Epstein, RJ1
Dennis, RF1
Cohen, JA1
Choi, JA1
Chung, SK1
Awotesu, S1
Eke, T1
Norcross, EW1
Sanders, ME1
Moore, Q1
Sanfilippo, CM1
Hesje, CK1
Shafiee, A1
Marquart, ME1
Güngör, SG1
Akova, YA1
Bozkurt, A1
Yasar, Ü1
Babaoğlu, MÖ1
Çetinkaya, A1
Çolak, M1
Bellini, LP1
Martins, GM1
Bulla, MC1
Fuller, JJ1
Marcus, DM1
de Castro, LE1
Sandoval, HP1
Bartholomew, LR1
Vroman, DT1
Solomon, KD1
Deramo, VA1
Lai, JC1
Fastenberg, DM1
Udell, IJ1
Feiz, V1
Vitale, AT1
Wegelin, JA1
Basavanthappa, S1
Wolsey, DH1
Harper, T1
Miller, D1
Flynn, HW1
Bhavsar, AR1
Ip, MS1
Glassman, AR1
Bohigian, GM1
Wiskur, BJ1
Robinson, ML1
Farrand, AJ1
Wada, T1
Kozai, S1
Tajika, T1
Sakaki, H1
Suzuki, T1
Ohashi, Y1
Haugen, B1
Werner, L1
Romaniv, N1
Haymore, J1
Kleinmann, G1
Mamalis, N1
Olson, RJ1
Mather, R1
Karenchak, LM1
Romanowski, EG1
Kowalski, RP1

Clinical Trials (5)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
Intracameral Levofloxacin (0.5%) Versus Intracameral Cefuroxime (1mg/0.1ml) Effect on Corneal Endothelial Cell Count and Morphology in Uneventful Phacoemulsification[NCT04212078]Phase 1/Phase 2138 participants (Anticipated)Interventional2019-07-29Recruiting
The Effects on Betadine 5% Penetration When Using Lidocaine 2% Jelly Versus Topical Tetracaine 0.5% for Topical Phacoemulsification Cataract Surgery.[NCT00827073]40 participants (Actual)Interventional2008-11-30Completed
A Phase 2 Evaluation of Anti-VEGF Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema: Bevacizumab (Avastin)[NCT00336323]Phase 2121 participants (Actual)Interventional2006-06-30Completed
A Randomized Trial Comparing Intravitreal Triamcinolone Acetonide and Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema[NCT00367133]Phase 3840 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-07-31Completed
The Standard Care vs. COrticosteroid for REtinal Vein Occlusion (SCORE) Study: Two Randomized Trials to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Intravitreal Injection(s) of Triamcinolone Acetonide With Standard Care to Treat Macular Edema[NCT00105027]Phase 3682 participants (Actual)Interventional2004-10-31Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

Change in Ln(Bacterial Colony Count) From Pre-antibiotic Administration to Post Study Medication Swabs

Within 3 hours from time of culture acquisition, the samples will be vortexed for 30 seconds and 100µl aliquots will be plated onto 5% sheep blood and chocolate agar plates. These plates will be incubated with 5% carbon dioxide at 35˚ C for 72 hours. After 72 hours all plates will be read for colony count and identification of all isolates will be performed using routine microbiological methods. The natural log of bacterial bacterial colony count will be used for the outcome measure. (NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab, and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)

InterventionLn(bacterial colony count) (Mean)
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop-0.14
Lidocaine 2% Jelly-0.52

Number of Bacterial Species in Pre-antibiotic Administration and in Post Study Medication Swabs

(NCT00827073)
Timeframe: (1) Pre-antibiotics swab and (2) Post-study medication (pre surgery)

,
Interventionbacterial spceies (Mean)
pre number of bacterial spicespost surgery number of bacterial speices
Lidocaine 2% Jelly11
Tetracaine 0.5% Drop11

Change in Central Subfield Retinal Thickness From Baseline Over All Study Visits

Change in central subfield retinal thickness from baseline measured on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT images were obtained at each visit following pupil dilation by a certified operator using the OCT3 machine (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Scans were 6 mm length and included the 6 radial line pattern for quantitative measures and the cross hair pattern (6-12 to 9-3 o'clock) for qualitative assessment of retinal morphology. The OCT scans were sent to the DRCR.net Reading Center for grading. Negative changes represent a decrease in retinal thickening. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionmicrons (Median)
3 Weeks6 Weeks9 Weeks12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks-35-35-74-56
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only-3-175-5
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w-13-20-48-40
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks-86-42-56-47
Laser at Baseline21-40-53-40

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had a >11% Decrease in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks043

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had a >11% Increase in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks020

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had Within ±11% Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks162

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Injection Only and Had a >11% Decrease in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 3 Weeks

The 1.25mg Bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Duration of effect of Bevacizumab was based on additional improvement versus maintained improvement versus worsening within 3 to 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in the DRCR.net paper, Reproducibility of macular thickness and volume using Zeiss optical coherence tomography in patients with diabetic macular edema.Ophthalmology 2007;114:1520-25. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups1112

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Injection Only and Had a >11% Increase in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 3 Weeks

The 1.25mg bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The pooled 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups110

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 1.25mg Injection Only and Had Within a ±11% Change of Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 3 Weeks

The 1.25mg bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks; and 1.25mg at baseline only. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The pooled 1.25mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
Pooled 1.25mg Initial Bevacizumab Injection Groups2164

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 2.5mg Bevacizumab and Had a >11% Decrease in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 3 Weeks

The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks

InterventionParticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks094

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 2.5mg Bevacizumab and Had Within a ±11% Change in Central Subfield Thickness From Baseline to 3 Weeks

The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 6 Weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 3 Weeks to 6 Weeks
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks091

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 2.5mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had a >11% Decrease in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks021

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 2.5mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had Within ±11% Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks2141

Change in Central Subfield Thickness From 3 to 6 Weeks Among Eyes That Received 2.5mg Bevacizumab at 6 Weeks and Had Within >11% Increase in Change of Central Subfield Thickness From 6 Weeks to 9 Weeks

The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group received an injection at both baseline and at 6 weeks. Change in central subfield thickness was categorized according to whether it exceeded 11%, the reliability limit for real change determined in another Diabetic Retinopathy Clinical Research Network study 16. The 2.5mg bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: 3 to 9 weeks

Interventionparticipants (Number)
>11% Decreased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 WeeksWithin ± 11% Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks>11% Increased Change from 9 Weeks to 12 Weeks
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks110

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Age at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
≤66 years>66 years
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-45-16

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Baseline Central Subfield Thickness

Pooled Bevacizumab groups include the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
<400 microns≥400 microns
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-3-102

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Baseline Visual Acuity Letter Score

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
<65 letters≥65 letters
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-35-28

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Clinical Diabetic Macular Edema Characterization at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
Typical/Predominantly FocalNeither Predominantly Focal or DiffuseTypical/Predominantly Diffuse
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-13-8-82

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Gender

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
FemaleMale
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-28-35

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to History of Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
NoYes
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-40-29

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Retinopathy Severity at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks + laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. Retinopathy severity based on investigator discretion on clinical examination. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe NPDR
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-31-31

Change in Central Subfield Thickness in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Subretinal Fluid Presence at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. Negative values represent a reduction in central subfield thickness. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionmicrons (Median)
Definite/QuestionableNo Evidence
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups-35-29

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Age at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
≤66 years>66 years
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups42

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Central Subfield Thickness at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
<400 microns≥400 microns
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups15

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Clinical Diabetic Macular Edema Characterization at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
Typical/Predominantly FocalNeither Predominantly Focal or DiffuseTypical/Predominantly Diffuse
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups703

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Gender

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
FemaleMale
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups33

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to History of Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
NoYes
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups52

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Retinopathy Severity at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
Proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe NPDR
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups31

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Subretinal Fluid Presence at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
Definite/QuestionableNo Evidence
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups61

Change in Visual Acuity (Letters) in Bevacizumab Groups From Baseline to 3 Weeks According to Visual Acuity at Baseline

Pooled Bevacizumab group includes the following treatment groups: 1.25mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 2.5mg at baseline and at 6 weeks, 1.25mg at baseline only, and 1.25mg at baseline and 6 weeks plus laser at 3 weeks. The 4 bevacizumab groups (N=87) were pooled to compare differences in response at 3 weeks among subgroups of interest. The pooled Bevacizumab treatment group will be the only group/arm that has values, all other treatment groups/arms will have a null value for this outcome measure. Positive values represent an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 Weeks

Interventionletters (Median)
<65 letters≥65 letters
Pooled Bevacizumab Groups31

Change in Visual Acuity Letter Score From Baseline Over All All Study Visits

Change in visual acuity letter score as measured using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the electronic Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study(E-ETDRS) technique. At baseline and at each follow up visit, best corrected visual acuity was measured at 3 meters by a certified tester using an electronic procedure based on the E-ETDRS method. Letter score best value = 97 and worst value = 0; positive change represents an improvement in letter score. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionletters (Median)
3 Weeks6 Weeks9 Weeks12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks5575
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only2314
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w00-20
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks6687
Laser at Baseline-213-1

Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Over All Study Visits

Visual acuity letter score as measured using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the electronic Early Treatment for Diabetic Retinopathy Study(E-ETDRS) technique. At baseline and at each follow up visit, best corrected visual acuity was measured at 3 meters by a certified tester using an electronic procedure based on the E-ETDRS method. Letter score best value = 97 and worst value = 0; an increase in a letter score by 10 is considered clinically significant. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 weeks

,,,,
Interventionparticipants (Number)
≥ 10 letter improvement at 3 Weeks≥ 10 letters worse at 3 Weeks≥ 10 letter improvement at 6 Weeks≥ 10 letters worse at 6 Weeks≥ 10 letter improvement at 9 Weeks≥ 10 letters worse at 9 Weeks≥ 10 letter improvement at 12 Weeks≥ 10 letters worse at 12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks41706171
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only21313022
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w20345242
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks40719060
Laser at Baseline11223131

Percentage of Participants With <250 Microns or ≥ 50% Reduction in Retinal Thickening From Baseline Over All Study Visits

Central subfield retinal thickness measured on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). OCT images were obtained at each visit following pupil dilation by a certified operator using the OCT3 machine (Carl Zeiss Meditec Inc., Dublin, CA). Scans were 6 mm length and included the 6 radial line pattern for quantitative measures and the cross hair pattern (6-12 to 9-3 o'clock) for qualitative assessment of retinal morphology. The OCT scans were sent to the DRCR.net Reading Center for grading. (NCT00336323)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3,6,9, and 12 Weeks

,,,,
Interventionpercentage of participants (Number)
3 Weeks6 Weeks9 Weeks12 Weeks
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline and at 6 Weeks37303833
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline Only10191014
1.25 mg Injection at Baseline, Laser at 3w + 1.25 mg Inj at 3w25253725
2.5 mg Injection at Baseline and 6 Weeks38222233
Laser at Baseline11171921

Central Subfield Thickness < 250 Microns at 2 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionPercentage of Eyes (Number)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation53
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone34
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone38

Central Subfield Thickness at 2 Years

Median central subfield thickness at two-years. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 2 Years

InterventionMicrons (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation243
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone305
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone279

Central Subfield Thickness on Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at Three Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: 3 years

InterventionMicrons (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation211
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone269
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone248

Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT Baseline to 3 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: baseline to 3 years

InterventionMicrons (Mean)Microns (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation-175
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-124
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-126
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation-158
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-103
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-114

Change In Visual Acuity [Measured With Electronic-Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS)]Baseline to 2 Years.

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale 97, worst 0. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years

InterventionLetter score (Mean)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation1
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-2
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-3

Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 year

InterventionLetter Score (Mean)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation5
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone0
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone0

Change in Visual Acuity From Baseline to 3 Years

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best Value on the scale=97, Worst Value=0 (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 year

InterventionLetter Score (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation8
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone2
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone4

Mean Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes and improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 years

InterventionMicrons (Mean)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation-139
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-86
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-77

Median Change in Central Subfield Thickness Baseline to 2 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years

InterventionMicrons (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation-131
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-74
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone-76

Median Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years

InterventionLetter score (Median)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation4
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone1
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone2

Overall Central Subfield Thickening Decreased by >=50% Baseline to 2 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 2 Years

InterventionPercentage of Eyes (Number)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation67
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone46
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone48

Percentage of Eyes With a Change in Central Subfield Thickness on OCT <250 Microns From Baseline to 3 Years

Overall central subfield change from baseline. Optical coherence Tomography (OCT) images were obtained by a certified operator using the Zeiss Stratus OCT machine. The average of 2 baseline central subfield thickness measurements was used for analysis.If the automated thickness measurements were judged by the reading center to be inaccurate, center point thickness was measured manually, and this value was used to impute a value for the central subfield. Negative change denotes an improvement. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 years

InterventionPercentage of Eyes (Number)
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation68
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone43
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone51

Distribution of Change in Visual Acuity Baseline to 2 Years

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: baseline to 2 years

,,
InterventionPercentage of Eyes (Number)
>= 15 letter improvement14 to 10 letter improvement9 to 5 letter improvementsame +- 4 letters5-9 letters worse10-14 letters worse>=15 letters worse
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone141114279620
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone171115236820
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation1813162410514

Distribution of Visual Acuity Change Baseline to 3 Years

Change in best correct visual acuity letter score as measured by a certified tester using an electronic visual acuity testing machine based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) method. A positive change denotes an improvement. Best value on the scale=97, worst=0 (NCT00367133)
Timeframe: Baseline to 3 years

,,
InterventionPercentage of Eyes (Number)
>= 15 letters better10-14 letters better5-9 letters betterno change, + - 4 letters5-9 letters worse10-14 letters worse>=15 letters worse
1mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone204172310917
4 mg Intravitreal Triamcinolone21169246616
Focal/Grid Laser Photocoagulation26181821448

Changes From Baseline in Best-corrected ETDRS Visual Acuity Score

(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionletters read (Mean)
CRVO Observation-12.1
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-1.2
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-1.2
BRVO Standard Care4.2
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide5.7
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide4.0

Changes in Retinal Thickness as Assessed by Stereoscopic Color Fundus Photography and Optical Coherence Tomography

(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months

Interventionum (Median)
CRVO Observation-277
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-196
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-261
BRVO Standard Care-224
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-149
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide-170

The Number of Study Participants Experiencing an Improvement by 15 or More Letters From Baseline in Best-corrected ETDRS Visual Acuity Score at the 12-month Visit

Visual acuity testing was done using electronic Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (E-ETDRS) visual acuity testing at 3 meters using the Electronic Visual Acuity Tester by a SCORE certified technician. A masked visual acuity examiner with no knowledge of treatment assignments performed visual acuity testing at the 4-month, 12-month, 24-month and 36-month visits. An E-ETDRS visual acuity score of 85 is approximately 20/20, and a score of 20 letters is approximately 20/400. A visual acuity letter score change of 15 is about three lines on a vision chart. (NCT00105027)
Timeframe: Change from baseline to 12 months

InterventionParticipants (Number)
CRVO Observation5
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide22
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide21
BRVO Standard Care35
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide31
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide34

Adverse Ocular Outcomes

(NCT00105027)
Timeframe: 12 months

,,,,,
Interventionevents (Number)
Initiation of IOP-lowering medicationsIOP > 35 mm HGIOP > 10 mm HG above baselineLaser peripheral iridotomyTrabeculectomyTube shuntCataract: lens opacity onset or progressionCataract surgeryInfectious endophthalmitisNoninfectious endophthalmitisRetinal detachmentIris neovascularizationRetinal neovascularizationVitreous hemorrhageYAG capsulotomySector or panretinal photocagulationPars plana vitrectomy
BRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide11212000270001111010
BRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide571450100384100233141
BRVO Standard Care311000153001152151
CRVO 1 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide18515002200000924092
CRVO 4 mg Dose Triamcinolone Acetonide32824100254000420030
CRVO Observation712000120000244151

Reviews

1 review available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis

ArticleYear
Review of third-and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones in ophthalmology: in-vitro and in-vivo efficacy.
    Advances in therapy, 2008, Volume: 25, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroquinolones; Ga

2008

Trials

3 trials available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis

ArticleYear
Efficacy and tolerability of a gatifloxacin/prednisolone acetate fixed combination for topical prophylaxis and control of inflammation in phacoemulsification: a 20-day-double-blind comparison to its individual components.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2013, Volume: 68, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Double-Blind Method

2013
A prospective randomized evaluation of topical gatifloxacin on conjunctival flora in patients undergoing intravitreal injections.
    Ophthalmology, 2009, Volume: 116, Issue:8

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteria; Colony Cou

2009
Aqueous humour penetration of moxifloxocin and gatifloxacin eye drops in different dosing regimens before phacoemulsification surgery.
    The British journal of ophthalmology, 2011, Volume: 95, Issue:9

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Aqueous Humor; Aza Compounds; Cataract; Chromatography, High Pressure L

2011

Other Studies

28 other studies available for gatifloxacin and Endophthalmitis

ArticleYear
Supercritical loading of gatifloxacin into hydrophobic foldable intraocular lenses - Process control and optimization by following in situ CO
    International journal of pharmaceutics, 2020, May-15, Volume: 581

    Topics: Carbon Dioxide; Drug Compounding; Drug Delivery Systems; Endophthalmitis; Gatifloxacin; Humans; Hydr

2020
The Search for Antifungal Prophylaxis After Artificial Corneal Surgery-An In Vitro Study.
    Cornea, 2020, Volume: 39, Issue:12

    Topics: Animals; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Antifungal Agents; Aspergillus fumigatus; Benzalkonium Compounds; C

2020
Endogenous bacterial endophthalmitis caused by Pantoea species: a case report.
    Canadian journal of ophthalmology. Journal canadien d'ophtalmologie, 2014, Volume: 49, Issue:1

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteremia; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endophthalmit

2014
Corneal crystalline deposits associated with topically applied gatifloxacin.
    Cornea, 2014, Volume: 33, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cataract Extraction; Corneal Diseases; Corneal Strom

2014
Third- and fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: retrospective comparison of endophthalmitis after cataract surgery performed over 10 years.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2008, Volume: 34, Issue:9

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprof

2008
Laboratory data and statistical evidence in fluoroquinolone study.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2008, Volume: 34, Issue:10

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Collagen; Colony Count, M

2008
Preventive effect against post-cataract endophthalmitis: drug delivery intraocular lens versus intracameral antibiotics.
    Current eye research, 2008, Volume: 33, Issue:10

    Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aqueous Humor; Biological Availability; Cataract E

2008
Fluoroquinolones and postoperative endophthalmitis.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2009, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprofloxacin; Endophthalmitis; Eye In

2009
Fluoroquinolones and postoperative endophthalmitis.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2009, Volume: 35, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Ciprofloxacin; Endophthalmitis; Eye In

2009
Rate of bacterial eradication by ophthalmic solutions of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones.
    Advances in therapy, 2009, Volume: 26, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Benzalkonium Compounds; Colony Count, Microbial; Drug Evaluati

2009
Gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, and balofloxacin resistance due to mutations in the gyrA and parC genes of Staphylococcus epidermidis strains isolated from patients with endophthalmitis, corneal ulcers and conjunctivitis.
    Ophthalmic research, 2009, Volume: 42, Issue:1

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Conjunctivitis; Corneal Ulcer; DNA Gyrase; DNA Topoisomerase I

2009
Evaluation of vitreous levels of gatifloxacin after systemic administration in inflamed and non-inflamed eyes.
    Acta ophthalmologica, 2009, Volume: 87, Issue:6

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Anti-Infective Agents; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Endophthalmitis; Fema

2009
Culture-positive endophthalmitis after implantation of intraocular Collamer lens.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2009, Volume: 35, Issue:10

    Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endophthalmitis; Eye Infections, Bacterial;

2009
Safety of intracameral injection of gatifloxacin, levofloxacin on corneal endothelial structure and viability.
    Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2009, Volume: 25, Issue:5

    Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Cell Survival; Endophthalmitis; Endothelium, Corne

2009
Preoperative lidocaine gel.
    Ophthalmology, 2010, Volume: 117, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anesthetics, Local; Anti-Infective Agents; Bacteria; Colony Count, Microbia

2010
Comparative efficacy of besifloxacin and other fluoroquinolones in a prophylaxis model of penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae rabbit endophthalmitis.
    Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2010, Volume: 26, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aza Compounds; Azepines; Colony Count, Micr

2010
Preventing endophthalmitis after cataract surgeries.
    The British journal of ophthalmology, 2011, Volume: 95, Issue:6

    Topics: Aged; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Cataract Extraction; Endophthalm

2011
Vitreous and aqueous penetration of orally administered gatifloxacin in humans.
    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 2004, Volume: 122, Issue:9

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aqueous Humor; Biological Availability; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroquinolones; Ga

2004
Prevention of Staphylococcus aureus endophthalmitis with topical gatifloxacin in a rabbit prophylaxis model.
    Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 22, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Disease Models, Ani

2006
Acute endophthalmitis in eyes treated prophylactically with gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2006, Volume: 142, Issue:5

    Topics: Acute Disease; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds

2006
Endophthalmitis after uncomplicated cataract surgery with the use of fourth-generation fluoroquinolones: a retrospective observational case series.
    Ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 114, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Bacter

2007
In vitro efficacy and pharmacodynamic indices for antibiotics against coagulase-negative staphylococcus endophthalmitis isolates.
    Ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 114, Issue:5

    Topics: Acetamides; Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Aqueous Humor; Aza

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
The risk of endophthalmitis following intravitreal triamcinolone injection in the DRCRnet and SCORE clinical trials.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2007, Volume: 144, Issue:3

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Infective Agents; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endophthalmitis; Fluoroqui

2007
Endophthalmitis.
    Ophthalmology, 2008, Volume: 115, Issue:2

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Aza Compounds; Bacteria; Endophthalmitis; Eye Infecti

2008
Toward improving therapeutic regimens for Bacillus endophthalmitis.
    Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2008, Volume: 49, Issue:4

    Topics: Animals; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacillus cereus; Biological Availability; Dexamethasone; Disease Mod

2008
Prophylactic efficacy of ophthalmic quinolones in experimental endophthalmitis in rabbits.
    Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics, 2008, Volume: 24, Issue:3

    Topics: Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Biological Availability; Disease Progression; Endo

2008
Prevention of endophthalmitis by collagen shields presoaked in fourth-generation fluoroquinolones versus by topical prophylaxis.
    Journal of cataract and refractive surgery, 2008, Volume: 34, Issue:5

    Topics: Administration, Topical; Animals; Anterior Chamber; Anti-Infective Agents; Collagen; Colony Count, M

2008
Fourth generation fluoroquinolones: new weapons in the arsenal of ophthalmic antibiotics.
    American journal of ophthalmology, 2002, Volume: 133, Issue:4

    Topics: Anti-Infective Agents; Aza Compounds; Bacteria; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Microbial; Endophtha

2002