ganirelix and Ovarian-Hyperstimulation-Syndrome

This article is a systematic review of the literature on utilization of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonists (GnRH-ant) for ovarian stimulation for IVF in special patient groups. Summarized by meta-analysis are the data from randomized controlled trials (RCT) in which GnRH-agonist (GnRH-a) and GnRH-ant were compared (eight RCT for poor response, four RCT for PCOS). Also reviewed are the data from two RCT and 13 retrospective or observational trials in which patients at risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) were triggered with GnRH-agonist instead of HCG. For poor responders, no differences in clinical outcomes were found, except a significantly higher number of cumulus-oocyte complexes in GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol as compared to GnRH-agonist long protocol (P=0.05). For PCOS patients, no differences in outcomes were found, except a significantly shorter duration of stimulation, when GnRH-antagonist multiple dose protocol and GnRH-agonist long protocol are compared (P<0.01). However, sample sizes are still small and power to detect subtle differences is therefore limited. For OHSS risk patients triggered with GnRH-agonist, reports on the efficacy of this measure vary in the literature. GnRH-agonist triggering appears to be associated with a reduction in the incidence of mild and moderate OHSS. For prevention of severe OHSS, as yet, only very limited evidence is available.

Topics: Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infertility, Female; Odds Ratio; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have been introduced in IVF to prevent premature LH surge. They bind competitively to pituitary receptors and prevent endogenous GnRH from exerting any stimulus on pituitary cells, avoiding the initial 'flare-up' effect and decreasing gonadotrophin secretion within a few hours. Pituitary reserve and gonadotrophin synthesis are not affected; therefore, the recovery of pituitary function is rapid. Two different regimes have been described. The multiple-dose protocol involves the administration of 0.25 mg cetrorelix (or ganirelix) daily from day 6-7 of stimulation, or when the leading follicle is 14-15 mm, until human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) administration. The single-dose protocol involves the single administration of 3 mg cetrorelix on day 7-8 of stimulation. Both antagonists with either regimen seem to be equally effective in the prevention of the LH surge. Compared with a long luteal agonist protocol, the treatment is shorter and requires a smaller amount of gonadotrophins. Pregnancy rate seems to be lower, but a decrease in the incidence of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is reported by several studies. A promising aspect of antagonists may be the possibility of making treatment less aggressive. Finally, in antagonist cycles, ovulation triggering is possible by GnRH agonists, avoiding the deleterious effect of HCG and thus preventing OHSS.

Topics: Chorionic Gonadotropin; Clinical Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Luteal Phase; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pituitary Gland

Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists have recently been introduced into clinical practice. They appear to offer a promising alternative to the long-established GnRH agonist regimens for prevention of a premature LH surge during ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques. Clinical outcomes achieved with antagonists are comparable with those of a long GnRH agonist protocol, while treatment times and gonadotrophin requirements are reduced and safety is improved. In particular, the antagonists appear to be associated with a lower risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) than do agonists. Patient surveys suggest a preference for antagonist over agonist treatment cycles. These benefits suggest that GnRH antagonists have the potential to replace agonists as the treatment of choice in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproductive techniques. Two agents, cetrorelix and ganirelix, are currently in clinical use. Cetrorelix is available in single- and multiple-dose formulations, offering increased flexibility compared with ganirelix.

Topics: Amino Acid Sequence; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infertility, Female; Molecular Sequence Data; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovary; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Recombinant Proteins

The safety of ovarian stimulation procedures or the procedure of assisted reproduction in general can be estimated by various parameters. Two of the most important are the health of children born after the procedure and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). The latter is important because it is the most severe, potentially life-threatening complication of any stimulation procedure. The use of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists in ovarian stimulation protocols has had no impact on the health of children born. This was proven in 227 children born after the use of cetrorelix and in 73 children born after the use of ganirelix. To analyse the incidence of OHSS and the impact of GnRH antagonists on clinical pregnancy rates compared with the long protocol, a meta-analysis was done. This showed a reduction of OHSS with the use of cetrorelix. Furthermore, when compared with the long protocol, clinical and ongoing pregnancy rates were not significantly reduced with the use of cetrorelix. Taken together, the use of GnRH antagonists are safe with regard to children's health. The incidence of OHSS does not increase with ganirelix, and a reduction can be expected with cetrorelix.

Topics: Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Incidence; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Newborn, Diseases; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy

Topics: Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy

The introduction of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone(GnRH) antagonists offers new potential for in vitro fertilization (IVF) clinics. Compared with GnRH agonists, the use of the GnRH antagonists significantly reduces the dose of gonadotrophin and duration of treatment required, and also reduces unwanted side-effects. Patients also tend to prefer treatment with GnRH antagonists compared with agonists. The GnRH antagonists are useful in both good and poor responders, and there is some flexibility in treatment protocols. A single dose of GnRH antagonist may be used in patients who do not want or require more aggressive stimulation. Promising data indicate advantages of GnRH antagonists in terms of reduced incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and reduced impairment of luteal function. It is anticipated that, as a result of further development of treatment protocols, pregnancy rates with the GnRH antagonists will become at least equivalent to those achieved with GnRH agonist protocols.

Topics: Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Gonadotropins; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Female; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction

The introduction of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists combined with gonadotrophins is considered to be one of the most significant advances in the development of in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. However, ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) remains a significant complication of controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. One possible strategy to reduce the risk of this complication would be the use of GnRH agonists instead of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) to trigger the final stages of oocyte maturation. GnRH agonists are able to induce an endogenous surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and the effect may be more physiological than that of exogenous hCG. Several uncontrolled and controlled clinical studies have confirmed the efficacy of GnRH agonists for triggering ovulation, and pregnancy rates are comparable to those achieved with hCG. The incidence of OHSS appears to be decreased, but larger controlled studies are required to confirm this observation. The recent introduction of GnRH antagonists has led to renewed interest in the use of GnRH agonists to induce final oocyte maturation. An international multicentre randomized controlled trial has been completed recently comparing the efficacy of GnRH agonist with hCG for triggering ovulation in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix for pituitary suppression. The aim of the study was to determine the efficacy of the novel protocol for ovarian stimulation before IVF, in terms of pregnancy outcomes and the prevention of OHSS.

Topics: Chorionic Gonadotropin; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Triptorelin Pamoate

The use of GnRH antagonists has revolutionized ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction. Two GnRH antagonists are clinically available, namely, cetrorelix and ganirelix. Several studies have directly compared these new stimulation protocols against the long GnRH agonist protocol. To evaluate whether there is a reduction in cases of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and/or a reduction in pregnancy rates, a meta-analysis was performed. There was a significant reduction of OHSS cases in the cetrorelix studies (odds ratio, OR, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.10-0.54), but no reduction for ganirelix (OR 1.13; 95% CI 0.24-5.31). The incidence of OHSS degree III cases was reduced in the cetrorelix protocols as compared to the long protocol to a nearly significant degree (OR 0.26; 95% CI 0.07-1.01). Ganirelix did not reduce the incidence of OHSS degree III at all (OR 1.08; 95% CI 0.27-4.38). The pregnancy rate per cycle was significantly lower in the ganirelix protocols than in the long protocol (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.59-0.98). The studies using cetrorelix showed quite similar, not significantly different results for the antagonist and the long protocol groups for the pregnancy rate per cycle (OR 0.91; 95% Cl 0.68-1.22). From the data one can conclude that cetrorelix but not ganirelix will reduce the incidence of cases of OHSS and that cetrorelix but not ganirelix will result in the same pregnancy rates as the long protocol. Several possibilities to explain this phenomenon are discussed.

Topics: Chorionic Gonadotropin; Estradiol; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Odds Ratio; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

New GnRH antagonists are available in clinical practice. The different studies have confirmed the efficacy of these antagonists in preventing the LH surge. Two protocols have been described: in the multiple dose regimens, small doses of antagonist (0.25 mg) are injected starting on stimulation day 5 or 6 until hCG. In the single dose protocol, one injection of a larger dose (3 mg) is proposed in the late follicular phase. Local and general tolerance of the two compounds is very good. The results obtained with both regimens as compared with GnRH agonists in long protocols are showing a reduction in the stimulation length, in the consumption of gonadotrophins and in the incidence of the OHSS. The pregnancy rates are comparable in the good prognosis patients selected in the published studies. When the final tuning of these new protocols will be done, the advantages of GnRH antagonists in reducing the complications and side effects of ovarian stimulation will give to GnRH antagonists an important place in IVF.

Topics: Chorionic Gonadotropin; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy

Does 'metformin' reduce the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) for women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist assisted conception treatment cycle?. A short course of metformin does not reduce the incidence of OHSS for women with PCOS undergoing a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle.. Metformin does reduce the incidence of OHSS in a GnRH-agonist treatment cycle.. A randomised placebo-controlled trial (RCT) using metformin or placebo. Randomisation was blinded to both patient and investigator, using a random permuted blocks method with a 50:50 allocation ratio. The study was completed over 5 years (2009-2014) with 153 randomised patients. A sample size calculation based on the incidence of OHSS was completed prospectively suggesting a minimum of 146 recruits was required for the trial with a power of 80% and a type 1 error of 0.05.. All patients met the Rotterdam criteria for PCOS and were treated with a standard GnRH antagonist IVF/ICSI treatment cycle in a tertiary infertility clinic. The study medication was started prior to stimulation and continued to oocyte retrieval. Of the 153 patients, 77 received metformin and 76 placebo.. There was no reduction in the incidence of moderate-severe OHSS (Placebo (PLA) 12.2%, metformin (MET) = 16%, 95% CI -0.08-0.16, P = 0.66). There was no difference in total gonadotrophin dose (PLA = 1200, MET = 1200, 95% CI -118.67-118.67, P = 0.75), oocytes retrieved (PLA = 15, MET = 14, 95% CI -2.37-4.37, P = 0.66) or fertilisation rate (PLA = 60.7%, MET = 53.3%, 95% CI -0.96-14.94, P = 0.07). However, using metformin resulted in a reduced clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) per cycle started (PLA = 48.7%, MET = 28.6%, 95% CI 0.04-0.35, P = 0.02) and live birth rate (PLA = 51.6%, MET = 27.6%, 95% CI 0.05-0.40, P = 0.02). Furthermore, when ethnicity was taken into account there was a significant reduction in pregnancy outcome for the South Asian population irrespective of metformin or placebo use (CPR per cycle started, White Caucasian = 44.4%, South Asian = 19.4%; 95% CI 0.06-0.39, P = 0.01).. This study was only undertaken on an infertility population with PCOS with a limited duration of study medication use.. This is the first adequately powered RCT to assess the impact of metformin on OHSS in a high-risk group (women with PCOS) undergoing a GnRH antagonist cycle. It does not support the empirical prescribing of metformin as an adjunct to a GnRH antagonist treatment cycle.. None.. EudraCT number 2009-010952-81.. 21 September 2009.. 30 October 2009.

Topics: Adult; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Female; Metformin; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Treatment Outcome

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists for controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) were only recently introduced into China. The efficacy and safety of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix was assessed in a multicenter, controlled, open-label study, in which Chinese women were randomized to either ganirelix (n = 113) or a long GnRH agonist protocol of triptorelin (n = 120). The primary end point was the amount of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (rFSH) required to meet the human chorionic gonadotropin criterion (three follicles ≥17 mm). The amount of rFSH needed was significantly lower for ganirelix (1272 IU) vs. triptorelin (1416 IU; P< 0.001). Ongoing pregnancy rates per started cycle were 39.8% (ganirelix) and 39.2% (triptorelin). Although both treatments were well tolerated, cancellation due to risk of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) was less frequent with ganirelix (1.8%) than triptorelin (7.5%) (P = 0.06). Less rFSH was needed in the ganirelix protocol than the long GnRH agonist protocol, with fewer reported cases of OHSS and similar pregnancy rates.

Topics: Adult; China; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Ectogenesis; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Incidence; Infertility; Oocyte Retrieval; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovary; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Recombinant Proteins; Severity of Illness Index; Triptorelin Pamoate; Young Adult

Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) are at risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) during ovarian stimulation. Use of GnRH antagonist in the general subfertile population is associated with lower incidence of OHSS than agonists and similar probability of live birth but it is unclear if this is true for patients with PCOS. Our aim was to compare the flexible GnRH antagonist and GnRH agonist long protocols in patients with PCOS undergoing IVF (primary end-point: ongoing pregnancy rate per patient randomized).. In this randomised controlled trial (RCT), 220 patients with PCOS were randomly allocated in two groups: long GnRH agonist down-regulation protocol (n = 110) and flexible GnRH antagonist protocol (n = 110).. No differences were observed in ongoing pregnancy rates [50.9 versus 47.3%, difference 3.6%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -9.6 to +16.8%] in the agonist and antagonist protocols, respectively. Incidence of OHSS Grade II was lower in the antagonist compared with agonist group (40.0 versus 60.0%, difference -20.0%, 95% CI: -7.1 to -32.9%, P < 0.01). Duration of stimulation (10 versus 12 days, difference 2 days, 95% CI: +1 to +2, P < 0.001) and total gonadotrophin required (1575 versus 1850 IU, difference -275 IU, 95% CI: -25 to -400, P < 0.05) were also lower in the antagonist compared with agonist protocol.. The current RCT suggests that the flexible GnRH antagonist protocol is associated with a similar ongoing pregnancy rate, lower incidence of OHSS grade II, lower gonadotrophin requirement and shorter duration of stimulation, compared with GnRH agonist. The GnRH antagonist might be the treatment choice for patients with PCOS undergoing IVF. The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov. ID: NCT00417144.

Topics: Adult; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Treatment Outcome; Triptorelin Pamoate

In high risk IVF patients the ovulation triggering was done with agonist (0.2 mg), 1.gr., Pregnyl 5000 IE, 2. and 4.gr., Ovitrelle 0.250 mg, 3.gr., and Pregnyl 10000 IE in the fifth--non-risk group. The protocol of the first and fourth group included antagonist, the second and third group was with short and the fifth group with long agonist protocol. There was no grave OHSS in the first group, one case in each second, third and fourth group and 4 cases in the fifth group, as a whole 7 patients (3.3%). In all of them an abdominal drainage lasting 4 to 30 days was performed and all pregnancies were preserved. The average success rate was 50%, 71.4% in the fourth and 43.1% in the fifth group. A protocol with antagonist and ovulation triggering with agonist or reduced dose ChG in order to diminish OHSS in high risk IVF patients is recommended.

Topics: Adult; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Glycoprotein Hormones, alpha Subunit; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome

To determine whether there are any differences in the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and implantation rates in high-risk patients undergoing IVF using a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression protocol.. Prospective randomized controlled trial.. University-based tertiary fertility center.. Sixty-six patients under 40 years of age with polycystic ovarian syndrome, polycystic ovarian morphology, or previous high response undergoing IVF.. Patients were randomized to an ovarian stimulation protocol consisting of either GnRH agonist trigger after cotreatment with GnRH antagonist (study group) or hCG trigger after dual pituitary suppression with a GnRH agonist (control group). Both groups received luteal phase and early pregnancy supplementation with IM progesterone (P), and patients in the study group also received E(2) patches and their doses were adjusted according to the serum levels.. Incidence of OHSS and implantation rate.. None of the patients in the study group developed any form of OHSS compared with 31% (10/32) of the patients in the control group. There were no significant differences in the implantation (22/61 [36.0%] vs. 20/64 [31.0%]), clinical pregnancy (17/30 [56.7%] vs. 15/29 [51.7%]), and ongoing pregnancy rates (16/30 [53.3%] vs. 14/29 [48.3%]) between the study and control groups, respectively.. The use of a protocol consisting of GnRH agonist trigger after GnRH antagonist cotreatment combined with adequate luteal phase and early pregnancy E(2) and P supplementation reduces the risk of OHSS in high-risk patients undergoing IVF without affecting implantation rate.

Topics: Adult; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Embryo Implantation; Estradiol; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Incidence; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Luteinizing Hormone; Odds Ratio; Oocytes; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Progesterone; Prospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Treatment Outcome

This work evaluated possible advantages of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration as an alternative to coasting in prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in women undergoing IVF/ intracytoplasmic sperm injection. A prospective randomized study comparing coasting (group A) (n = 96) and GnRH antagonist administration (group B) (n = 94) in patients at risk of OHSS was performed. The primary outcome measure was high quality embryos. The secondary outcome measures were days of intervention, number of oocytes, pregnancy rate, number of cryopreserved embryos and incidence of severe OHSS. There were significantly more high quality embryos (2.87 +/- 1.2 versus 2.21 +/- 1.1; P < 0.0001), and more oocytes (16.5 +/- 7.6 versus 14.06 +/- 5.2; P = 0.02), in group B as compared with group A. There were more days of coasting as compared with days of antagonist administration (2.82 +/- 0.97 versus 1.74 +/- 0.91; P < 0.0001). In conclusion, GnRH antagonist was superior to coasting in producing significantly more high quality embryos and more oocytes as well as reducing the time until HCG administration. There was no significant difference in pregnancy rate between the two groups. No OHSS developed in either group.

Topics: Adult; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy

Elevated estradiol (E(2)) levels predispose to development of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). Since GnRH antagonist is associated with a reduction in E(2) levels, we hypothesized that GnRH-antagonist treatment of women down-regulated with GnRH agonist who are at risk of OHSS might reduce E(2) levels and avoid cycle cancellation.. Retrospective study in a university-based assisted reproduction technology (ART) programme in 87 patients treated with long luteal (LL) or microdose flare (MDF) with ovarian hyperresponse and 87 control patients without ovarian hyperresponse. GnRH-antagonist (ganirelix acetate) treatment was started and leuprolide acetate discontinued in women who failed to respond to a reduction in gonadotrophin dosage.. In the treatment group, there was a significant, reproducible reduction in serum E(2) levels. Mean E(2) at the start of ganirelix treatment was 4219.8 pg/ml and decreased in 24 h to 2613.7 pg/ml (36.7%; P < 0.001). An average of 24.9 +/- 8.8 oocytes were obtained at retrieval and an average of 19.1 +/- 8.0 were metaphase II (79.2%). Fertilization occurred in 13.9 +/- 8.1 embryos (72.8%). In this high risk group, two cases of severe OHSS (2.3%) occurred. The ongoing pregnancy rate was 51.8%. Compared with the control group, there were no statistically significant differences in the rate of oocyte recovery, oocyte maturity, 2PN rate, fertilization, cancellation, OHSS or pregnancy.. GnRH-antagonist treatment of women pretreated with GnRH agonist rapidly reduced circulating serum E(2) without adversely affecting oocyte maturation, fertilization rates or embryo quality and resulted in a high pregnancy rate in this subgroup of patients at risk of OHSS.

Topics: Adult; Estradiol; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Leuprolide; Oocytes; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Reference Values; Retrospective Studies

Studies with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix in assisted reproduction have indicated that compared with traditional GnRH agonist downregulation protocols, slightly fewer oocytes are retrieved. In this study it was investigated whether an increase in the starting dose of recombinant FSH (rFSH) could compensate for this loss.. A randomized, double-blind, multicentre clinical trial comparing a starting dose of 150 and 200 IU of rFSH (follitropin beta), in women undergoing treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix.. In total, 257 women were treated with rFSH, of whom 131 received 150 IU and 126 women 200 IU. Overall, 10.3 oocytes were retrieved in the 150 IU group and 11.9 in the 200 IU group (P=0.051). This difference became significant when women with cycle cancellation before HCG administration were excluded. Nearly 500 IU of additional rFSH was given in the high-dose group (2014 versus 1541 IU). In the low-dose group, 4.6 high-quality embryos were obtained compared with 4.5 in the high-dose group. Vital pregnancy rates were similar (31 and 25% in the 150 and 200 IU-treated women, respectively). Serum concentrations of FSH, estradiol and progesterone were significantly higher in the high-dose group at day 6 of rFSH treatment and on the day of HCG administration. In the high-dose group, serum LH concentrations were higher at day 6 of rFSH treatment but lower at the day of HCG administration.. By increasing the starting dose from 150 to 200 IU of rFSH, slightly more oocytes can be retrieved in GnRH antagonist protocols for assisted reproduction. However, because this did not translate into a higher number of high quality embryos, the clinical relevance of such a dose increase may be questioned.

Topics: Adult; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Estradiol; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Osmolar Concentration; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy, Ectopic; Progesterone; Recombinant Proteins; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted

This multicentre, randomized study was performed to assess the efficacy and safety of 0.25 mg ganirelix (Orgalutran, Antagon) treatment, using triptorelin (Decapeptyl) in a long protocol as a reference treatment. In total, 236 subjects were randomized to treatment with ganirelix (0.25 mg, s.c.) and 119 to triptorelin (0.1 mg, s.c.) treatment (treatment ratio 2:1). Treatment with ganirelix started on day 6 of stimulation, whereas treatment with triptorelin started on menstrual cycle day 21 to 24 of the previous cycle (i.e. the midluteal phase). The ganirelix regimen was on average 17 days shorter (9 versus 26 days) compared to the triptorelin regimen. The median total dose of recombinant FSH (Puregon) used was 450 IU less (1350 versus 1800 IU) in the ganirelix protocol. The initial follicular growth was faster and, consequently, oestradiol concentrations were higher in the ganirelix group. On the day of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG), the mean number of follicles > or = 11 mm was 10.1 and 10.7 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 1090 and 1370 pg/ml in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. Per attempt, 7.9 and 9.6 oocytes (mean) were retrieved in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The fertilization rates (64.0% ganirelix and 64.9% triptorelin) and the mean number of good quality embryos (2.7 and 2.9) were comparable in both treatment groups. The implantation rate was identical (22.9%). The ongoing pregnancy rate per attempt was 31.0 and 33.9% in the ganirelix and triptorelin groups respectively. The ganirelix regimen showed an improved local tolerance in that the percentage of subjects with at least one local skin reaction was 2-fold lower than in the triptorelin group (11.9 versus 24.1%). Taking all data together, it may be concluded that ganirelix offers a new treatment regimen in ovarian stimulation that is short, safe and well-tolerated, optimizing convenience for the patient.

Topics: Adult; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Embryo Transfer; Estradiol; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Luteolytic Agents; Ovarian Follicle; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovary; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome; Triptorelin Pamoate

Does the addition of a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist to cabergoline treatment during the luteal phase in fresh IVF cycles triggered with a GnRH agonist, and planned for freeze-all, reduce the rate of mild and moderate ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS)?. Retrospective cohort study of 480 IVF patients at risk for OHSS with GnRH agonist trigger from 2011 to 2018, stratified into three groups based on treatment received: GnRH agonist trigger alone (Group 1, n = 208), GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline (Group 2, n = 167) or GnRH agonist trigger + cabergoline + GnRH antagonist (Group 3, n = 105). Data on patient demographics, incidence, severity and symptomatology of OHSS and laboratory findings were collected.. Group 1 had more free peritoneal fluid than Group 2 (28% versus 19%, P = 0.04) or Group 3 (28% versus 5%, P = 0.001). Group 1 reported abdominal discomfort and bloating more than Group 2 (33% versus 21%, P = 0.01) or Group 3 (33% versus 18%, P = 0.006). Group 1 had more electrolyte abnormalities than Group 2, who had more than Group 3. No patients developed severe OHSS. Mild and moderate OHSS rate was higher in Group 1 (38%) than Group 2 (29%, P = 0.048) or Group 3 (18%, P = 0.006) and in Group 2 than Group 3 (P = 0.046).. Addition of cabergoline to GnRH agonist triggering in high-risk OHSS patients, and subsequent addition of GnRH antagonist for 5 days in the luteal phase, sequentially reduces the risk of mild and moderate OHSS and improves patient comfort compared with GnRH agonist trigger alone.

Topics: Adult; Buserelin; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Retrospective Studies

Topics: Adult; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Combined Modality Therapy; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Living Donors; Menotropins; Nephrectomy; Oocyte Retrieval; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Insufficiency; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome

To study whether intranasal GnRH agonist (GnRHa) can be effectively used for luteal support in high-responder patients undergoing fresh-embryo transfer after ovulation induction with the use of GnRHa.. Retrospective cohort study.. Private fertility clinic.. Forty-six high-responder patients were administered a GnRHa ovulation trigger to avoid ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS), followed by 2 weeks of daily intranasal GnRHa (nafarelin) for luteal-phase support. No additional progesterone supplementation was administrated.. Intranasal GnRHa for luteal-phase support.. The primary outcome was ongoing clinical pregnancy rate.. High median progesterone levels were measured at midluteal phase and on the day of the first positive pregnancy test (190 nmol/L on both measures). We obtained 24 (52.1%) ongoing clinical pregnancies. None of the patients developed OHSS.. Intranasal GnRHa is effective in achieving luteal-phase support in high-responder patients triggered with GnRHa and avoiding OHSS.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Embryo Transfer; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility; Menotropins; Nafarelin; Oocyte Retrieval; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

A retrospective, cohort study of high-risk patients undergoing IVF treatment was performed to assess if there is a difference in clinical pregnancy rate, live birth rate and the incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, when a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) trigger with intensive luteal support is compared to human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) with standard luteal support. The control group consisted of 382 high-risk patients having a GnRH antagonist protocol with 194 receiving an hCG trigger. All patients had ≥18 follicles ≥11mm or serum oestradiol >18,000pmol/l on the day of trigger. Patients had a single or double embryo transfer at cleavage or blastocyst stage. Logistic regression was used to adjust for differences between the groups. An intention-to-treat analysis of all cycles was performed. No statistically significant differences were observed in terms of positive pregnancy test, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate. Only one patient (0.3%) was hospitalized with severe OHSS in the GnRHa group, compared to 26 patients (13%) in the hCG group. In conclusion, GnRHa trigger is associated with similar pregnancy rates with hCG trigger and a significant reduction in hospitalization for severe OHSS after an intention to treat analysis was performed.

Topics: Adult; Chorionic Gonadotropin; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Incidence; Infertility, Female; Luteal Phase; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies

To evaluate the effects of a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with or without oral contraceptive pill (OCP) pretreatment, in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).. In this retrospective cohort study, 410 infertile patients with PCOS were assessed in their first ICSI cycles between January 2006 and June 2013. In Group A (n=208), patients underwent a long luteal GnRH agonist protocol, and in Groups B (n=143) and C (n=59), patients underwent a GnRH antagonist protocol. The patients in Group C also received OCPs containing 30mg of ethinyl oestradiol and 3mg of drospirenone prior to treatment. The main outcome measures were pregnancy and ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates.. Demographic features, body mass index, duration of infertility, serum baseline hormone levels, cycle outcomes, multiple pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates, OHSS rates, total number of Grade A embryos and total number of transferred embryos were comparable between the groups. Clinical pregnancy rates were 27.4%, 26.6% and 23.7% in Groups A, B and C, respectively (p=0.853).. OCP pretreatment was found to have no beneficial or adverse effects in patients with PCOS undergoing a GnRH antagonist protocol for ICSI, but can be used for cycle scheduling.

Topics: Adult; Androstenes; Cohort Studies; Contraceptives, Oral, Combined; Contraceptives, Oral, Hormonal; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Therapy, Combination; Embryo Transfer; Ethinyl Estradiol; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Treatment Outcome

Do high-risk patients who develop severe early ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and receive low-dose GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase have lower live birth rates compared with high-risk patients who do not develop severe early OHSS and do not receive GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase?. Low-dose luteal GnRH antagonist administration in women with severe early OHSS is associated with similar live birth rates to that of high-risk patients who do not develop severe early OHSS and do not receive GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase.. It has been reported that luteal GnRH antagonist administration in patients with established severe early OHSS appears to prevent patient hospitalization and results in quick regression of the syndrome on an outpatient basis. However, the effect of such treatment on pregnancy outcome has been investigated in only a small number of animal studies.. This is a prospective cohort study of 192 IVF patients who were at high risk for OHSS and who did not wish to cancel embryo transfer and have all embryos cryopreserved. The study was conducted between January 2009 and December 2011 at Eugonia Assisted Reproduction Unit.. Patients were <40 years of age, with polycystic ovaries, at high risk for OHSS (defined by the presence of at least 20 follicles ≥11 mm on the day of triggering of final oocyte maturation) and not willing to cancel embryo transfer and cryopreserve all embryos, if severe early OHSS was diagnosed by Day 5 of embryo culture. Patients who were diagnosed with severe early OHSS on Day 5 post-oocyte retrieval were administered 0.25 mg of ganirelix for 3 days, from Day 5 until and including Day 7 (OHSS + antag group, n = 22). High-risk patients who did not develop the severe early OHSS did not receive GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase (control group, n = 172). All patients underwent embryo transfer on Day 5.. Live birth rates (40.9 versus 43.6%), ongoing pregnancy rates (45.5 versus 48.8%), clinical pregnancy rates (50 versus 65.1%), positive hCG (72.7 versus 75%), duration of gestation (36.86 ± 0.90 weeks versus 36.88 ± 2.38 weeks) and neonatal weight (2392.73 ± 427.04 versus 2646.56 ± 655.74 g) were all similar in the OHSS + antag and control groups, respectively. The incidence of major congenital malformations was 2.9% (3/103) in children born in the control group compared with no cases (0/14) in children born following luteal GnRH antagonist administration. No stillbirths or intrauterine deaths, and no cases of pregnancy-induced late OHSS were recorded in either group. None of the 22 patients with severe early OHSS required hospitalization following luteal antagonist administration. Ovarian volume, ascites, hematocrit, white blood cell count, serum estradiol and progesterone decreased significantly (P < 0.001) by the end of the monitoring period (Day 11 post-oocyte retrieval), indicating rapid resolution of the severe OHSS.. This is a prospective cohort investigation with a very limited number of patients receiving the intervention and a larger number of control patients. Our findings suggest that low-dose luteal GnRH antagonist administration during the peri-implantation period may be safe, although larger studies with follow-up of the children born are required.. Our study suggests for the first time that low-dose luteal GnRH antagonist administration in women with severe early OHSS is associated with a favourable IVF outcome, comparable to control high-risk patients without severe OHSS and not receiving the intervention. Regarding the wider implications on the concept of an OHSS-free clinic, administration of GnRH antagonist in the luteal phase may present a tertiary management level in patients with established severe OHSS, along with the use of GnRH antagonist protocols for primary prevention and the replacement of hCG with GnRH agonist for triggering final oocyte maturation for secondary prevention. However, at present, fresh embryo transfer combined with antagonist administration should only be used with caution by experienced practitioners, after carefully deciding which patients can have a fresh transfer or embryo cryopreservation, until the current data are confirmed by larger trials.

Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Embryo Implantation; Estradiol; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Luteal Phase; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome

To describe the management of a patient with a pituitary adenoma secreting follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) associated with ovarian hyperstimulation who was treated with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist.. Case report.. University teaching hospital.. A woman of reproductive age with secondary amenorrhea and ovarian hyperstimulation due to a pituitary adenoma secreting FSH, which persisted after transsphenoidal surgery.. Clinical treatment with a GnRH antagonist.. A decrease in serum estradiol levels.. During the treatment period, ovarian hyperstimulation decreased as shown by a reduction in estradiol levels and an improvement in the patient's clinical condition and in the ultrasonography parameters.. The GnRH antagonist was found to be effective for the short-term treatment of ovarian hyperstimulation secondary to a pituitary adenoma secreting FSH, thus representing a therapeutic option that should be taken into consideration in such cases.

Topics: Adenoma; Adult; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Pituitary Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome

Management of established severe OHSS requires prolonged hospitalization, occasionally in intensive care units, accompanied by multiple ascites punctures, correction of intravascular fluid volume and electrolyte imbalance. The aim of the present study was to evaluate whether it is feasible to manage women with severe OHSS as outpatients by treating them with GnRH antagonists in the luteal phase.. This is a single-centre, prospective, observational, cohort study. Forty patients diagnosed with severe OHSS, five days post oocyte retrieval, were managed as outpatients after administration of GnRH antagonist (0.25 mg) daily from days 5 to 8 post oocyte retrieval, combined with cryopreservation of all embryos. The primary outcome measure was the proportion of patients with severe OHSS, in whom outpatient management was not feasible.. 11.3% (95% CI 8.3%-15.0%) of patients (40/353) developed severe early OHSS. None of the 40 patients required hospitalization following luteal antagonist administration and embryo cryopreservation. Ovarian volume, ascites, hematocrit, WBC, serum oestradiol and progesterone decreased significantly (P < 0.001) by the end of the monitoring period, indicating rapid resolution of severe OHSS.. The current study suggests, for the first time, that successful outpatient management of severe OHSS with antagonist treatment in the luteal phase is feasible and is associated with rapid regression of the syndrome, challenging the dogma of inpatient management. The proposed management is a flexible approach that minimizes unnecessary embryo transfer cancellations in the majority (88.7%) of high risk for OHSS patients.

Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Cryopreservation; Embryo Transfer; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Oocyte Retrieval; Outpatients; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate

To describe an outpatient treatment protocol for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) that results in rapid normalization of symptoms with minimal side effects.. Case series.. Midwestern academic reproductive endocrinology division.. Four consecutive patients, diagnosed with OHSS, who presented after oocyte retrieval but before embryo transfer.. All embryos were frozen and each patient was treated with the same dopamine agonist and GnRH antagonist protocol.. Daily weights, days to resolution of clinical symptoms, side effects of the treatment protocol, and whether or not acute care or hospitalization was necessary.. The most rapid weight loss was within the first 5 days of treatment. The average time to resolution of clinical symptoms was 5.75 days. No side effects were reported and no patients required acute care or hospitalization.. Dopamine agonists and GnRH antagonists, when given together at the time of diagnosis of OHSS, appear to work rapidly and effectively to diminish the clinical symptoms of the disease. The potential benefit of finding an outpatient treatment for OHSS with rapid onset and minimal side effects warrants further investigation into this protocol.

Topics: Adult; Cabergoline; Dopamine Agonists; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ergolines; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Treatment Outcome

Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) is a serious complication of ovarian stimulation protocols. Currently, no curative therapy exists and the main preventive option is cycle cancellation. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist administration in the luteal phase was recently proposed as a new approach for the management of patients with established severe OHSS. Three polycystic ovarian syndrome patients undergoing IVF treatment developed severe OHSS, diagnosed 6 days after oocyte retrieval. On day 6, the patients underwent blastocyst transfer and received GnRH antagonist for 4 days, combined with luteal phase support using exogenous oestradiol and progesterone. Two patients had successful pregnancies that resulted in births of healthy infants, while one patient had a biochemical pregnancy. In all patients, established severe OHSS regressed to a moderate form of the syndrome, no pregnancy-induced life-threatening OHSS was observed, while a short monitoring period was required at an outpatient level, avoiding the need for patient hospitalization. This is the first report in the literature on GnRH antagonist administration in the luteal phase, combined with embryo transfer and exogenous oestradiol and progesterone supplementation. This novel treatment was effective in the regression of established severe OHSS, and resulted in the birth of healthy infants.

Topics: Adult; Embryo Transfer; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infertility, Female; Luteal Phase; Oocyte Retrieval; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Polycystic Ovary Syndrome; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Outcome

OHSS is a serious complication of COH and PCOS is a major risk factor for its development.. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of the application of GnRH-agonist in patients with PCOS for triggering the ovulation and prophylactic of OHSS.. In the present study we evaluated 29 patients with PCOS who had been stimulated for the purposes of ART with gonadotrophins and GnRH-antagonist and application of GnRH-agonist (Decapeptyl; Dipherilyn-0.2 mg) instead of HCG.. From the observed group one patient developed severe form of late OHSS. The average number of aspirated oocytes was 22.5 and the clinical pregnancy was 46.8%.. The application of protocole with GnRH-antagonist and triggering of the ovulation with GnRH-agonist is a good alternative when a high risk of development of OHSS exists and our results prove that.

Topics: Adult; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Treatment Outcome; Triptorelin Pamoate

Several approaches have been proposed for the management of OHSS that reduce, but do not completely eliminate the incidence of human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG)-induced early severe OHSS. Three women diagnosed with polycystic ovarian syndrome underwent ovarian stimulation for IVF using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol. Three days after oocyte retrieval, severe early OHSS was diagnosed by analysis of haematocrit (Ht), white blood cell (WBC) count, serum urea, and ultrasonographic assessment of ovarian size and ascitic fluid. On the same day, antagonist administration was re-initiated and continued daily for a week, while all embryos were cryopreserved. No progression of severe early OHSS was observed in any of the patients. A marked decrease of Ht, WBC count, ovarian volume and ascitic fluid was observed during 1 week of follow-up, and none of the patients required hospitalization. GnRH antagonist re-initiation might represent a new strategy for flexible management of patients with established severe early OHSS. Based on the flexibility of the approach, if severe OHSS does not occur, patients may proceed to embryo transfer, while if severe early OHSS ensues, antagonist administration combined with embryo cryopreservation appear to be associated with prevention of life-threatening OHSS, facilitation of regression of severe OHSS to a moderate form and avoidance of patient hospitalization.

Topics: Adult; Cryopreservation; Embryo, Mammalian; Female; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Oocyte Retrieval; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome

Forty-seven patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome because of markedly elevated serum E2 levels on either long-luteal or microdose flare leuprolide acetate regimens were treated with ganirelix acetate. Despite being pretreated with GnRH agonist and without withholding gonadotropins, serum E2 decreased by 49.5% and 41.0% of pretreatment values (long luteal and microdose flare, respectively) after initiation of ganirelix, and 68.1% of the patients became pregnant.

Topics: Adult; Cohort Studies; Estrogens; Female; Fertility Agents, Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Infertility, Female; Leuprolide; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Rate; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors

A new treatment option for patients undergoing ovarian stimulation is the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol, with the possibility to trigger a mid-cycle LH surge using a single bolus of GnRH agonist, reducing the risk of developing ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) in high responders and the chance of cycle cancellation. This report describes the use of 0.2 mg triptorelin (Decapeptyl) to trigger ovulation in eight patients who underwent controlled ovarian hyperstimulation with recombinant FSH (rFSH, Puregon) and concomitant treatment with the GnRH antagonist ganirelix (Orgalutran) for the prevention of premature LH surges. All patients were considered to have an increased risk for developing OHSS (at least 20 follicles > or =11 mm and/or serum oestradiol at least 3000 pg/ml). On the day of triggering the LH surge, the mean number of follicles > or =11 mm was 25.1 +/- 4.5 and the median serum oestradiol concentration was 3675 (range 2980-7670) pg/ml. After GnRH agonist injection, endogenous serum LH and FSH surges were observed with median peak values of 219 and 19 IU/l respectively, measured 4 h after injection. The mean number of oocytes obtained was 23.4 +/- 15.4, of which 83% were mature (metaphase II). None of the patients developed any signs or symptoms of OHSS. So far, four clinical pregnancies have been achieved from the embryos obtained during these cycles, including the first birth following this approach. It is concluded that GnRH agonist effectively triggers an endogenous LH surge for final oocyte maturation after ganirelix treatment in stimulated cycles. Our preliminary results suggest that this regimen may prove effective in triggering ovulation and could be said to prevent OHSS in high responders. The efficacy and safety of such new treatment regimen needs to be established in comparative randomized studies.

Topics: Adult; Embryo Transfer; Estradiol; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Human; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Humans; Infertility, Male; Luteinizing Hormone; Male; Ovarian Follicle; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Pregnancy; Progesterone; Recombinant Proteins; Sperm Injections, Intracytoplasmic; Triptorelin Pamoate

This case report describes the first attempt to treat imminent ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) by using a gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist. A 33 year old, normo-ovulatory woman undergoing in-vitro fertilization received daily subcutaneous injections of 150 IU of recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone (recFSH) from cycle day 2, together with GnRH antagonist (ganirelix) 0.125 mg from cycle day 7 onwards. On cycle day 10 the patient was found to have a serum oestradiol concentration of 16 500 pmol/l and, on ultrasound examination, four preovulatory (>16 mm) and nine intermediate sized (10-16 mm) follicles. RecFSH injections were discontinued, human chorionic gonadotrophin (HCG) withheld, whereas the ganirelix dose was increased to 2 mg/d. This regimen led to a rapid decrease in serum oestradiol concentrations and the decrease in ovarian size on ultrasound. Since GnRH antagonists will become clinically available for in-vitro fertilization programmes in the near future this suggested regimen might have a role in preventing severe OHSS.

Topics: Adult; Estradiol; Female; Fertilization in Vitro; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Ovarian Follicle; Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome; Ovulation Induction; Recombinant Proteins; Ultrasonography