gamma-aminobutyric acid and Sleep Wake Disorders

gamma-aminobutyric acid has been researched along with Sleep Wake Disorders in 86 studies

gamma-Aminobutyric Acid: The most common inhibitory neurotransmitter in the central nervous system.
gamma-aminobutyric acid : A gamma-amino acid that is butanoic acid with the amino substituent located at C-4.

Sleep Wake Disorders: Abnormal sleep-wake schedule or pattern associated with the CIRCADIAN RHYTHM which affect the length, timing, and/or rigidity of the sleep-wake cycle relative to the day-night cycle.

Research

Studies (86)

Authors

Clinical Trials (18)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Opioid Consumption

Patient Controlled Analgesia use over 48 hours reported in Morphine equivalent dosage. (NCT01546857)
Timeframe: 48 hours post operatively

Visual Analogue Scale for Pain

Severity of pain measure on a scale from zero to ten. Zero no pain to ten severe pain. (NCT01546857)
Timeframe: 48 hours post operatively

Quality of Sleep.

A questionnaire was administered asking participants about the quality of their sleep on the night of surgery asked on postoperative day 1, and on the first postoperative night ( POD 2) . Scored on a scale of zero to 3. Zero meaning poor postoperative sleep and 3 indicating better postoperative sleep. (NCT01546857)
Timeframe: Night of surgery (POD 1) and Postoperative Day 2.(POD 2)

Arousal Index (NASOI)

Arousal index, as determined by PSG, was NASO per hours of sleep from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Arithmetic mean of NASOI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

International Restless Legs Syndrome Study Group Rating Scale (IRLS)

IRLS: psychometrically; clinically valid; clinician-administered instrument assesses severity of RLS. RLS symptom severity and impact on daily living comprise of 10 items giving 2 subscale scores and 1 global score. Subscale scores: symptom severity(6 items) and impact on daily living(3 items), item 3 loaded equally on both subscales. Global score calculated from 10 items. Score of all items range from 0-4, total score range:0-40. Lower scores: lower severity and better quality of life. Arithmetic mean of IRLS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS)

"LPS, as determined by PSG, was number of epochs from the beginning of the recording (lights-out) to the start of the first 20 consecutive non-wake epochs (10 minutes of persistent sleep) divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LPS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model." (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Latency to Stage R Sleep (LREM)

LREM, as determined by PSG, was number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of the recording to the first occurrence of Stage R sleep divided by 2. Arithmetic mean of LREM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Number of Arousals (NASO)

NASO, as determined by PSG, was calculated as number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)

NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage 2 Non-REM [Stage N2] 30-second (30-sec) epoch, Stage 3 Non-REM [Stage N3] 30-sec epoch, or stage rapid eye movement [stage R] 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epochs After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)

NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Percentage of Participants With Response to Clinical Global Impression - Improvement (CGI-I) Scale

CGI-I: 7-point clinician rated scale to assess improvement in disease condition as compared to the start of the study medication (baseline), ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Improvement is defined as a score of 1 (very much improved) or 2 (much improved). Higher score = more affected. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Periodic Limb Movement Arousal Index (PLMAI)

PLMAI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements leading to arousal per hour (per hour of Total Sleep Time [TST]). Arithmetic mean of PLMAI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Periodic Limb Movement in Sleep Index (PLMSI)

PLMSI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements in sleep per hour based on TST. Arithmetic mean of PLMSI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Periodic Limb Movement Index (PLMI)

PLMI, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements per hour based on time in bed (TIB). Arithmetic mean of PLMI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Restless Leg Syndrome - Quality of Life Scale (RLS-QoL)

RLS-QoL: psychometrically and clinically valid and reliable participant-rated instrument, assesses impact of RLS on participant quality of life. Specifically, it assessed effects of RLS on health status function (symptom severity, daily activity, social functioning, sleep, concentrating and decision making, travelling, sexual activity, and work) giving a summary score ranging from 0-100. Higher scores reflect better quality of life. Recall period: 1 week prior to assessment. Arithmetic mean of RLS-QoL score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Restless Legs Syndrome-Next Day Impact (RLS-NDI)

RLS-NDI:participant-rated instrument to assess daytime performance and participant's previous night's sleep, consists of 14 items encompassing 5 domains:tiredness;emotional functioning;social functioning;cognitive functioning;activities of daily living and 1 global item for overall well-being. Each item: 0-10 scale; 0=Not at all; 10=Extremely. Total score: sum of scores from question 1-14 (question 10, 11: scores reversed). Total score range: 0-140; higher scores: more severe impact. Arithmetic mean of RLS-NDI of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Sleep Efficiency (SE)

SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100. Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Latency Subscale

SSQ: participant-rated instrument assesses sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. Latency (time to fall asleep [in minutes]): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0 - 840 minutes, lower value: better sleep. Arithmetic mean of subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Hours of sleep subscale results reported as sTST. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET

Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Number of Awakenings Subscale

SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items giving 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This (1 item) subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0 awakenings to 30 awakenings. Lower value indicates better quality of sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Quality of Sleep Subscale

SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This 1 item subscale: numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before, Range: 0 to 100, higher score: better quality of sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET

Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ): Total Wake Time After Sleep Onset Subscale

SSQ: participant-rated instrument to assess sleep behavior; measures sleep quantity, quality. Comprised of 5 items yielding 5 subscale scores: latency, hours of sleep, number of awakenings, total wake time after sleep onset, quality of sleep. This 1 item subscale (in minutes): numerical rating completed by participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period: night before. Range: 0-1440 minutes. Lower value: better sleep. Arithmetic mean of this subscale score of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. Results of hours of sleep subscale reported as sTST. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of each intervention period or ET

Subjective Total Sleep Time (sTST)

sTST as derived from Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ), a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. Completed by the participant 30 minutes after waking; recall period is the night before. Arithmetic mean of sTST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 3 and Week 5 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Total Sleep Time (TST)

TST, as determined by PSG, was the number of non-wake (30-sec) epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of the recording. TST was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of TST of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

WASO as determined by Polysomnography (PSG) was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. WASO= Wake Time During Sleep [WTDS] epochs + Wake Time After Sleep [WTAS] epochs)/2. WTDS: number of wake epochs (30 seconds of PSG recording) after onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening or end of 8-hour recording/2 and WTAS: number of wake epochs after final awakening until end of the 8-hour recording/2. WASO was measured on 2 consecutive days within a period. Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or Early Termination (ET)

Wake Time After Sleep (WTAS)

WTAS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the final awakening until the end of the 8-hour recording. WTAS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of WTAS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS)

WTDS, as determined by PSG, was the number of wake (30-sec) epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to the final awakening or at the end of 8-hour recording. WTDS was the sum of 2 consecutive days of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. Arithmetic mean of WTDS of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Arousals (NASO)

NASO, as determined by PSG was the number of times there is a shift from a stage N2 to N3 or R 30-sec epoch to a stage N1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NASO for each participant at each period was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 1 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO1)

NAASO1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 1 30-sec epoch from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NAASO1 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Number of Awakenings of at Least 2 Epoch After Sleep Onset (NAASO2)

NAASO2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least 2 30-sec epochs from the onset of persistent sleep to light on. Each entry to be counted must be separated by a Stage N2 30-sec epoch, Stage N3 30-sec epoch, or Stage R 30-sec epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive days of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of NAASO2 of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Periodic Limb Movement (PLM)

PLM, as determined by PSG was number of periodic limb movements based on time in bed (TIB). Calculated at each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of PLM of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Sleep Efficiency (SE)

SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed (TIB)(both in minutes), multiplied by 100. Sum of 2 consecutive days of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean for SE of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Hourly and Quarterly Assessment of Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO)

WASO, as determined by PSG was time spent awake from sleep onset to final awakening. WASO = (sum of WTDS 30-sec epochs and WTAS 30-sec epochs)/2, measured on 2 consecutive days at end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total) and each individual quarter of night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). Arithmetic mean of WASO of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Medical Outcomes Study - Sleep Scale (MOS-SS)

MOS-SS:Participant rated instrument, assesses sleep quantity, quality;with 12 items(7 subscale scores:sleep disturbance, snoring, awakening short of breath/with headache, sleep adequacy, somnolence, sleep quantity, optimal sleep;2 composite index scores:sleep problems Index I, II). Subscale scores total range:0-100(except sleep quantity[range 0-24 hours], optimal sleep[range 0-1: 0= <7 or >8 hours;1=7/8 hours]). Higher scores=poorer sleep outcomes(except sleep quantity, adequacy). Arithmetic mean of MOS-SS scores of each participant for all periods was taken before linear mixed model analysis. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Minutes of Stage N1, N2, N3 and R Sleep

Minutes of Stage 1 Non-Rapid Eye Movement (Non-REM) sleep (Stage N1), Stage 2 Non-REM sleep (Stage N2), Stage 3 Non-REM sleep (Stage N3) or Slow Wave Sleep (SWS) and Stage REM (Stage R) sleep, as determined by PSG were calculated as total number of Stage N1 30-second (30-sec) epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N2 30-sec epochs divided by 2, total number of Stage N3 30-sec epochs divided by 2 and total number of Stage R 30-sec epochs divided by 2 respectively. Arithmetic mean of minutes of stage N1, N2, N3 and R sleep of each participant for all periods was taken prior to employing linear mixed model. (NCT00991276)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) and Week 17 (End of Intervention Period 3) or ET

Mean AUCss

The area under the plot of plasma concentration of drug against time after drug administration is defined as the area under the curve (AUC). The AUCss is the area under the curve during the steady-state period. The AUCss is of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the extent of absorption. AUCss used concentration data from 0 to 24 hours at steady-state for Weeks 4 and 12. (NCT01332305)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

Mean Css, Max and Css, Min

"Css, max is defined as the maximum or peak concentration of a drug observed after multiple administration, at steady state. Css, max is one of the parameters of particular use in estimating the bioavailability of drugs, by measuring the total amount of drug absorbed. Css, min is defined as the minimum concentration of a drug observed after its administration, in steady state. ng, nanograms; PK, pharmacokinetic; W, week; BLQ, below limit of quantitation." (NCT01332305)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

Mean Tmax and T1/2

"Tmax is defined as the time to the maximum or peak concentration of a drug observed after multiple administration. T1/2 is defined as the time to when half of the total amount of a particular substance is eliminated from the body." (NCT01332305)
Timeframe: Weeks 4 and 12

"Number of Participants With a Score of Much Improved or Very Much Improved on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale (Response) at (Week 12) Using LOCF"

"The investigator -rated Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGI-I) scale is an assessment designed to allow investigators to rate the change of a participant's disease severity over time based on a seven-point scale, with a score of 1 being very much improved, a score of 2 being much improved, a score of 3 being minimally improved, a score of 4 being no change, a score of 5 being minimally improved,a score of 6 being much worse, and a score of 7 being very much worse. Participants with a response of much improved or very much improved were classified as responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Change From Baseline in IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 Using Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF)

The International Restless Legs Syndrome (IRLS) Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Sleep Adequacy, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep adequacy domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater adequacy. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Basline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in Sleep Quantity, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep quantity domain were measured in time (number of hours of sleep each night). The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score at the End of Treatment (Week 12) for Participants With Pain at Baseline or the End of Week 12 Using LOCF

The Daily RLS pain score was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined study visits. The change from baseline was calculated as the End of Treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline (Day 1) value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score to Week 12 for Participants With a Baseline Pain Score of at Least 4 Using LOCF

The Average Daily RLS pain was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined visits. The change from baseline was calculated as the End of Treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline (Day 1) value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Daytime Somnolence Score, an Item on the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the daytime somnolence domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater daytime somnolence. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Overall Life-Impact Score of the RLS Quality of Life (QoL) Questionnaire at Week 12 Using LOCF

The Restless Legs Syndrome Quality of Life (RLS-QoL) questionnaire is a disease-specific, participant-rated questionnaire that assesses the impact of RLS on daily life, emotional well-being, social life, and work life of the participants. The RLS-QoL Questionnaire is presented on a 0 (lowest possible score) to 100 (highest possible score) scale. It was completed at Day 1 and at the end of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Early Termination). (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline in the Profile of Mood State (POMS) Scale at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The Profile of Mood States (POMS) Brief Form contains 30 adjectives; each participant is asked to rate the degree to which each adjective describes themselves based on how they felt during the past week including the date on which the adjective was rated. The possible ratings range from 0 (Not all all) to 4 (Extremely). The Total Mood Disturbance Score (range of 0 to 120) is obtained by summing the values of six domains. Higher scores indicate a more negative mood disturbance. The POMS was completed at Baseline (Day 1), and at the end of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 (or Early Termination)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disturbance Score, an Item on the MOS Sleep Scale, at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The MOS Sleep Scale measures most constructs of sleep. The scale has a battery of questions to measure specific aspects of sleep in participants with co-morbidities. The four domains scored from the MOS Sleep Scale were sleep disturbance,' sleep quantity,' sleep adequacy, and daytime somnolence. The scores of the sleep disturbance domain ranged from 1 to 100, with a high score indicating greater impairment of sleep. The assessment was completed at Baseline (Day 1) and end of Weeks, 4, 8, and 12 (or end of Treatment)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and Week 12

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment (Week 12) in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment in Average Daily Total Sleep Time (Hours) Using LOCF

Average daily total sleep time was derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD; an instrument with separate components to be completed [self-reported] at bedtime and waketime) as the mean of non-missing total sleep time over the 7 days before each visit, where total sleep time = [(wake up time - lights out time) - time to fall asleep - time awake during the night] in hours. The change was calculated as the end of treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Treatment in Average Daily Wake Time (Minutes) After Sleep Onset Using LOCF

Average daily wake time after sleep onset was derived from the Pittsburgh Sleep Diary (PghSD) as the mean of non-missing total hours awake during the night after falling asleep over the 7 days before each visit. The change was calculated as the end of treatment (Week 12) value minus the Baseline value. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Change From Baseline to the End of Week 1 in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline and the End of Week 1

Number of Participants Classsified as Responders on the Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale at Week 12 Using LOCF

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants Who Had an Onset of Response to Treatment at the End of Week 1 Based Upon the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I Using LOCF

"The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. Items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. Response was defined by an IRLS Rating Scale total score at the end of Week 1 < 15 and at least a 6-point reduction from the participant's Baseline score and an investigator-rated CGI-I response of much improved or very much improved." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Week 1

Number of Participants Who Indicated on the Mood Assessment That Their Mood Was Much Improved or Very Much Improved at Week 12 (End of Treatment) Using LOCF

The Mood Assessment is a non-disease-specific question surveying global change in a participant's overall mood. Participants were asked to rate their overall change in mood since the start of the study by choosing a score in a range from 1 (Very Much Improved) to 7 (Very Much Worse). The assessment was completed at Day 1 and the ends of Weeks 4, 8, and 12 or (Early Termination). (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants With a Rating of Excellent for the Overall Quality of Sleep in Past Week Measured by the Post-Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) at the End of Treatment (Week 12) Using LOCF

"The Post-Sleep Questionnaire (PSQ) was designed to evaluate overall sleep quality, ability to function, and RLS symptoms' interference with sleep over the past week. Participants were asked to rate overall sleep quality (as either Excellent, Reasonable, or Poor), ability to function, number of nights with RLS symptoms, number of nights awakened by RLS symptoms, and the number of hours spent awake due to RLS symptoms over the past week." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Treatment (Week 12)

Number of Total Responders to Treatment Based on the Investigator-Rated CGI of Improvement at the End of One Week of Treatment

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: End of Week 1

The Time to Onset of the First Response to Treatment on the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score and the Investigator-rated CGI-I

The Response was defined by an IRLS Rating Scale total score at the end of Week 1 < 15 and at least a 6-point reduction from the participant's Baseline score and an investigator-rated CGI-I response of much improved or very much improved. The median time to onset is estimated using the product-limit estimation method. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) to End of Treatment (Week 12)

Time to Onset of the First RLS Symptom From the 24-hour RLS Record Obtained at the End of Treatment (Week 12)

The time to onset of the first RLS symptoms from the 24-hour RLS Record is defined as the length of time from the start of the 24-hour assessment period (8:00 AM) to the time when 50% of participants experienced their first symptom. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Change From Baseline in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score at Week 12 by Baseline RLS Rating Scale Total Score Category (Baseline RLS Severity) Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Mean Change in the IRLS Rating Scale Total Score From Baseline at Week 12 by RLS Treatment History Using LOCF

The IRLS Rating scale is a measure of RLS disease severity. The scale reflects the participant-reported assessment of primary sensory and motor features and associated sleep problems in RLS. Ten items (individually scored from 0 to 4) are included that assess the impact of symptoms on participants' mood, daily life, and activities. The total scale score is a sum of all of the individual item scores and ranges from 0-40 points, with 40 being the most severe. The scale assesses symptoms over the week prior to measurement. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Investigator-rated CGI-I Scale Responders at Week 12 by RLS Treatment History Using LOCF

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Basline and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Responders to Treatment Based on the Participant-Rated CGI of Improvement at Week 1 and Week 12 (End of Treatment)

"The CGI-I scale is a standardized tool that is widely used in psychopharmacologic trials. For the CGI-I, the investigator was asked to rate the participant's overall change in RLS symptoms from Baseline. Scores ranged from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Participants who were much improved (score of 2) or very much improved on the CGI-I scale at the end of treatment (Week 12) are classified as Responders." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 1 and Week 12

Number of Participants Classified as Responders With at Least 30% and 50% Improvement in the Average Daily RLS Pain Score Using LOCF

"The Mean Daily RLS pain was assessed by participants reporting whether they experienced any pain associated with RLS in the last 24 hours and rating their pain levels on an 11-point numerical rating scale, with 0 being no pain and 10 the most intense pain imaginable. The assessment was performed for 7 days prior to Baseline and pre-defined visits A Responder is a participant with a score of much improved or very much improved on the investigator rated CGI I Scale at the end of treatment (Week 12 using LOCF)." (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Number of Participants Experiencing No RLS Symptoms in Each of the Seven 4-hour Periods From the 24-hour RLS Record at Week 12 (End of Treatment)

RLS severity ratings were summarized in 6 non-overlapping 4-hour periods beginning at 8 AM. A 4-hour period from 6 PM to 10 PM was also prospectively included to reflect the time frame when the most participants would experience their first symptoms of the day. (NCT00365352)
Timeframe: Week 12

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Score

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety Score (HADS-A) consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no anxiety to 3 = severe feeling of anxiety. The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety (including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of anxiety (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Anxiety Score - FAS Subset With Moderate/Severe Baseline Scores

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety Score (HADS-A) consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no anxiety to 3 = severe feeling of anxiety. The anxiety subscale determines a state of generalized anxiety (including anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of anxiety. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Score

"Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Depression Score (HADS-D) consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no depression to 3 = severe feeling of depression. The depression subscale focuses on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of depression" (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Depression Score - FAS Subset With Moderate/Severe Baseline Scores

Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D) consists of 7 items that are assessed by a score of 0 = no depression to 3 = severe feeling of depression. The depression subscale focuses on the state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Score range = 0 to 21; higher scores indicate a greater intensity of depression (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Optimal Sleep

Number of subjects responding to have had optimal sleep. Optimal sleep is 1 item in the Medical Outcome Study (MOS)sleep scale, a patient-reported measure consisting of twelve items that assess the key constructs of sleep. Subjects were asked to recall sleep-related activities over the past week. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) Total Intensity Score

Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) includes 10 descriptors (scale 0-10) of different pain symptoms & 2 temporal items assessing the duration of spontaneous ongoing and paroxysmal pain. A total intensity score is calculated by sub grouping the questions into five pain dimensions, summing the five sub groups, and converting into a percentage. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Weekly Mean Pain Score at End of Treatment (Week 8) From Daily Pain Diary

Daily Pain Diary scale : mean score from 11-point numerical scale of pain; range: 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Endpoint weekly mean pain score: mean of the last 7 available pain scores from a daily pain diary during double blind treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: each day of Week 8

Weekly Mean Sleep Interference Score

11-point numerical scale with which the patient describes pain interference with sleep over past 24 hours; range: 0 (pain does not interfere with sleep) to 10 (pain completely interferes with sleep). Endpoint weekly mean score: mean of last 7 available scores from daily sleep interference diary during double-blind treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC)

Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC): clinician's judgment of overall change in the patient's condition over a defined period on a 7-point scale; range: 1 Very Much Improved to 7 Very Much Worse. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): Frequency

Self-rated instrument to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Scale of 17 PTSD symptoms over previous week; frequency scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (every day), and severity 0 (not at all distressing) to 4(extremely distressing). The total Davidson Trauma Scale score ranges from 0 to 136. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): Severity

Self-rated instrument to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Scale of 17 PTSD symptoms over previous week; frequency scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (every day), and severity 0 (not at all distressing) to 4(extremely distressing). The total Davidson Trauma Scale score ranges from 0 to 136. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS): Total Score

Self-rated instrument to measure symptom severity and treatment outcome in post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). Scale of 17 PTSD symptoms over previous week; frequency scale: 0 (not at all) to 4 (every day), and severity 0 (not at all distressing) to 4(extremely distressing). The total Davidson Trauma Scale score ranges from 0 to 136. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study (MOS) Sleep Subscales

Medical Outcome Study (MOS) is a patient-rated questionnaire consisting of 12 items that assess key constructs of sleep (7 subscales as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. MOS-Sleep Scale is scored from 0 to 100. A higher score indicates more disturbance. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Attention

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Concentration

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Confusion

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Memory

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Reasoning

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Medical Outcome Study Cognitive Subscale (MOS-Cog); Thinking

The number of subjects' responses to each of the 6 questions on the Medical Outcome Study Cognitive (MOS-Cog) subscale were summarized at baseline and Week 8. Category range: all of the time to none of the time. No formal statistical modeling was used. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf)

Modified Brief Pain Inventory Short Form (m-BPI-sf): self-administered questionnaire to assess severity of pain (measured by 4 items)and impact of pain on daily functions (measured by 7 items)in past 24 hours. Items are rated on an 11-point scale ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating greater pain and/or interference due to pain. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Number of Subjects With 30% and 50% Response in Weekly Mean Daily Pain Rating Score (DPRS) From Baseline Until Endpoint (Week 8)

Based on weekly mean daily pain rating score (DPRS), responders were defined as subjects with a >= 30% and >=50% reduction in weekly mean scores from baseline until endpoint (Week 8). Endpoint was calculated as the mean of the last 7 available pain scores from the daily pain diary while in the double-blind treatment phase. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 8

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Efficacy

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS); Efficacy: measure of patient satisfaction with treatment for acute or chronic pain. Response range: 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Mean scores were calculated and transformed onto a scale of 0-100, range: 0 = worst possible satisfaction to 100 = best possible satisfaction with pain treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 8

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Impact of Current Pain Medication

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS); Impact of Current Pain Medication: measure of patient satisfaction with treatment for acute or chronic pain. Response range: 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Mean scores were calculated and transformed onto a scale of 0-100, range: 0 = worst possible satisfaction to 100 = best possible satisfaction with pain treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 8

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Medication Characteristics

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS); Medication Characteristics: measure of patient satisfaction with treatment for acute or chronic pain. Response range: 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Mean scores were calculated and transformed onto a scale of 0-100, range: 0 = worst possible satisfaction to 100 = best possible satisfaction with pain treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 8

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS): Satisfaction With Current Pain Medication

Pain Treatment Satisfaction Scale (PTSS); Satisfaction with Current Pain Medication: measure of patient satisfaction with treatment for acute or chronic pain. Response range:1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree). Mean scores were calculated and transformed onto a scale of 0-100, range: 0 = worst possible satisfaction to 100 = best possible satisfaction with pain treatment. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Screening, Week 8

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC): a patient-rated instrument that measures change in patient's overall status on a 7-point scale; range: 1 Very Much Improved to 7 Very Much Worse. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Week 8

Weekly Mean Pain Score From Daily Pain Diary

Daily Pain Diary scale : mean score from 11-point numerical scale of pain; range:0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Mean of scores available for each week. (NCT00292188)
Timeframe: Baseline through Week 8

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Scores at Week 14

FIQ: 20-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess areas such as health status, progress, and outcomes in participants with fibromyalgia. 11 items related to physical functioning, other items assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. FIQ contains 10 sub-scales scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more impairment in the subscale attribute. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Mean Pain Score at Endpoint (Up to Week 14)

Daily pain diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(no pain) to 10(worst possible pain). Participants rated their pain during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily at awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available pain scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. Final weekly (endpoint) mean pain score is defined as the mean pain score from the last 7 pain diary entries in the study while the participant was on study medication. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Quality Score at Endpoint (Up to Week 14)

Daily quality of sleep diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(best possible sleep) to 10(worst possible sleep). Participants rated their quality of sleep during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily upon awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. The endpoint (up to week 14) mean quality of sleep score was based on Least Squares (LS) Means using ANCOVA, with treatment group and center in the model and the baseline mean sleep score used as the covariate. Final weekly (endpoint) mean sleep quality score is defined as the mean sleep quality score from the last 7 sleep diary entries in the study while the participant was on study medication. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Multidimensional Assessment of Fatigue (MAF) at Week 14

MAF is a 16-item self-administered questionnaire that yields a Global Fatigue Index (GFI), measures 4 dimensions of fatigue: degree and severity, amount of distress it causes, its timing and degree to which fatigue interferes with activities of daily living. Only 15 items are used to calculate the GFI. GFI score range from 1 (no fatigue) to 50 (severe fatigue). (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) Scores at Week 14

Pain visual analog scale (VAS): Participants assessed the severity of their pain using a 100 mm visual analog scale (VAS). The scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain), measurement on a scale corresponds to the magnitude of their pain. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Percentage of Participants With Optimal Sleep Assessed Using MOS-SS

Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no), as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more disturbance. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Total Daily Acetaminophen Dose

Acetaminophen (up to 4 gram/day as needed for pain relief) was an allowable concomitant medication as a rescue therapy. The total daily acetaminophen dose taken during double-blind treatment was calculated for each participant as: (total acetaminophen dose during the study) divided by (total number of study days). (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Week 14

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Subscale Scores at Week 14

FIQ: 20-item self-administered questionnaire designed to assess areas such as health status, progress, and outcomes in participants with fibromyalgia. 11 items related to physical functioning, other items assess pain, fatigue, stiffness, difficulty working, and symptoms of anxiousness and depression. FIQ contains 10 sub-scales scored from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more impairment in the subscale attribute. Total score range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) at Week 14

HADS: participant rated questionnaire with 2 subscales. HADS-A assesses state of generalized anxiety (anxious mood, restlessness, anxious thoughts, panic attacks); HADS-D assesses state of lost interest and diminished pleasure response (lowering of hedonic tone). Each subscale comprised of 7 items with range 0 (no presence of anxiety or depression) to 3 (severe feeling of anxiety or depression). Total score 0 to 21 for each subscale; higher score indicates greater severity of anxiety and depression symptoms. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS): Sub-scales at Week 14

Participant-rated 12 item questionnaire assess constructs of sleep over past week.7 subscales: sleep disturbance, snoring, awakened short of breath, sleep adequacy, somnolence (range:0-100); sleep quantity(range:0-24), optimal sleep(yes or no), as well as a 9-item overall sleep problems index. Except Adequacy, Optimal, Quantity of sleep, higher scores=more impairment. Scores transformed(actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range*100);total score range:0-100,higher score=more intensity of attribute. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey at Week 14

SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role emotional and mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning) and is reported as 2 summary scores; Physical Component Score and Mental Component Score. Total score range for the summary scores = 0- 100, where higher score represents higher level of functioning. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 14

Change From Baseline in Weekly Mean Sleep Quality Score

Daily quality of sleep diary consists of 11-point NRS ranging from 0(best possible sleep) to 10(worst possible sleep). Participants rated their quality of sleep during past 24 hours, self-assessment done daily upon awakening. Baseline=Last 7 available scores before taking study medication up to and including Day 1. The weekly mean quality of sleep score was based on LS Means using mixed model repeated measures ANCOVA, with treatment, center, week, and treatment-by-week interaction in the model and the baseline mean sleep score used as the covariate. Weekly mean sleep quality score is defined as the mean of the last 7 daily sleep diary entries. (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14

Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC)

Number of participants with categorical change in overall status. PGIC: a participant-rated instrument assessing change in participant's overall status from baseline, on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). (NCT00333866)
Timeframe: Week 14

Absolute Adhesional Abdominal Pain Score Assessed at Baseline Through Week 12 in Patients Treated With Pregabalin 150-300 mg Daily Compared With Patients Given Look Alike Placebo

Patients were randomized to pregabalin or placebo 75 mg twice a day. Patients were allowed to double the dose on day 3 if adequate pain relief was not obtained. Abdominal pain reduction was measured on a Likert scale. A Likert scale assumes the intensity of pain is linear on a continuum from no pain at level 0 to severe pain at level 10. Patients were required to complete a daily dairy recording pain using the Likert 11-point numeric scale. The primary end point was a positive change in the daily pain diary of 2 points from each patient's baseline at weeks 8 after the completion of the blinded study and at week 12 during the open label portion of the study. After 7 weeks all patients are randomized to study drug pregabalin 150 to 300 mg daily for 4 additional weeks after a one week wash out with no medication. (NCT00310765)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 2 through week 12

Improved Sleep Scores

Absolute Improvement in Sleep by assessing Mean Daily sleep interference scores as measured weekly starting at baseline and reported weekly through week 12 excluding the first week. This score is an 11 point scale the documents the pain interference in sleep in the preceding 24 hours. 0 is no interference and 10 is pain completely disrupted sleep in the previous 24 hours. During the study patients recorded a daily sleep interference score based on 11 point scale (0-10) with the higher number being the most sleep interference (NCT00310765)
Timeframe: Baseline and week 2 through week 12

Latency to Persistent Sleep (LPS)

LPS, as determined by PSG, was the total number of epochs recorded on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period, from the beginning of the recording to the start of the first 20 consecutive non-wake epochs. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO 1)

NAASO 1, as determined by PSG, was the number of times there was a wake period of at least one epoch in duration. Each entry counted was separated by a Stage 2 epoch, Stage 3 and 4 epoch, or Stage rapid eye movement (REM) epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording was divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Number of Awakenings After Sleep Onset (NAASO 2)

NAASO 2, as determined by PSG, was the number of times that there was a wake period of at least two epochs in duration. Each entry counted was separated by a Stage 2 epoch, Stage 3 and 4 epoch, or Stage REM epoch. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Sleep Efficiency (SE)

SE, as determined by PSG, was the TST divided by the time in bed, multiplied by 100. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Slow Wave Sleep (SWS)

SWS, as determined by PSG, Stage 3 plus 4 sleep divided by TST times 100 was the percentage of TST. The sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Total Sleep Time (TST)

TST, as determined by PSG, was the number of non-wake epochs from the beginning of recording to the end of the recording. TST was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recording divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Wake After Sleep Onset (WASO) at Weeks 5 and 11

WASO was the sum of wake time during sleep measured in epochs (30 seconds of polysomnography [PSG]) recording) after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording [i.e. awake epoch immediately prior to the end of the recording]) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or Early Termination (ET)

Wake Time After Sleep (WTAS)

WTAS, as determined by PSG, was the total amount of time awake after the final awakening until the end of the 8 hours. WTAS was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Wake Time During Sleep (WTDS)

WTDS, as determined by PSG, was the total amount of time awake the participant experienced after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to the final awakening, or at the end of 8 hours of recording. WTDS was the sum of 2 consecutive nights of recordings divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Change From Baseline in MOS-SS Sleep Disturbance at Weeks 5 and 11

MOS-SS, a participant rated instrument used to assess sleep quantity and quality over the previous week, was comprised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 index composite index scores. Sleep Disturbance subscale score (4 items): individual scores were transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score divided by possible raw score range times 100) and ranged from 0 to 100; higher score indicated greater disturbance. Total score ranged=0 to 100; higher score indicates greater intensity of attribute. Change was score at week x minus score at baseline. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 1 (Baseline Intervention Period 1), Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 7 (Baseline Intervention Period 2) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Change From Baseline in MOS-SS Sleep Problems Index II Weeks 5 and 11

MOS-SS, a participant rated instrument used to assess sleep quantity and quality over the previous week, was compromised of 12 items yielding 7 subscale scores and 2 index composite index scores. Composite index included Sleep Problems Index II (9 items), scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores indicated greater sleep problems. Change was score at week x minus score at baseline. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 1 (Baseline Intervention Period 1), Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1), Week 7 (Baseline Intervention Period 2) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

Daily Pain Score

Pain intensity as measured by NRS; a participant rated scale 0 to 10 (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain possible). Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily pain scores. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Daily up to Day 73 or ET

Latency of Sleep Onset (LSO)

LSO as reported on daily Subjective Sleep Questionnaire (SSQ), a participant reported subjective estimate of the amount of time to fall asleep after lights out. Weekly values were calculated as the average minutes reported on the participant's daily SSQ. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Sleep Quality

Sleep Quality as meassured by numeric rating scale (NRS), a participant rated scale 0 to 10, (0 = very poor sleep, 10 = excellent sleep). Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily diary scores. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Subjective Total Sleep Time (sTST)

sTST as reported on daily SSQ, a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was asleep after lights out until final awakening. Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participants daily SSQ values. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET

Subjective Wake After Sleep Onset (sWASO)

sWASO as reported on daily SSQ, a participant reported subjective estimate of the total amount of time the participant was awake after initial sleep onset until final awakening. Weekly values were calculated as the average of the participant's daily SSQ values. (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4 of Each Intervention Period or ET

WASO by Each Quarter of the Night

WASO, as determined by PSG, was the sum of wake time during sleep (number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening) and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual quarter of the night (eight hours in 2 hour increments). (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

WASO by Hour of the Night

WASO, as determined by PSG, was the wake time during sleep (number of wake epochs after the onset of persistent sleep and prior to final awakening) and wake time after sleep (the number of epochs after the final awakening until the end of PSG recording) on 2 consecutive nights divided by 2 at the end of each intervention period by each individual hour (8 hours total). (NCT00883740)
Timeframe: Week 5 (End of Intervention Period 1) and Week 11 (End of Intervention Period 2) or ET

"Percentage of Participants Who Was Categorized as Improved (Very Much Improved, Much Improved, or a Minimally Improved) According to the Patient Global Impressions of Change (PGIC)"

PGIC was defined as participant rated instrument to measure participant's change in overall status on a 7-point scale; range from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Change was defined as a score of 1 (very much improved), 2 (much improved), 3 (minimally improved), 4 (no change), 5 (minimally worse) , 6 (much worse) or 7 (very much worse) on the scale. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline for Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scores at Endpoint-LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) Relative to Baseline

Change from baseline in mean NRS-Pain scores at endpoint-LOCF. Daily pain scores were assessed on an 11-point numerical rating scale <(NRS)-Pain> ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Bodily Pain

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- General Health Perception

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Mental Health

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Physical Functioning

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Role Limitations-Emotional

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Role Limitations-Physical

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Social Functioning

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Analysis of SF-36 Health Survey Results at Endpoint- Vitality

Subject-rated measure of health status comprised of 36 items: 8 subscale scores (physical functioning, role limitations-physical, bodily pain, general health perceptions, vitality, social functioning, role limitations-emotional, and mental health. Subscale scores range: 0-100. Higher subscale scores = better health status. Change from baseline = score at observation minus score at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Anxious

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Depression

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Feel Good

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Housework

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Morning

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Pain

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Physical Function

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Stiffness

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Tiredness

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Total Scores

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) at Endpoint - Work Miss

FIQ is a 20-item patient-reported outcome instrument designed to assess health status, progress, and outcomes in patients with fibromyalgia (10 subscales; 11 questions). Scores range from 0 to 100 with higher scores indicating more impairment. Change = mean FIQ scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Anxiety

Change: Mean HADS score at observation minus Mean at baseline. HADS anxiety and depression subscale scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of the subscale condition. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) - Depression

Change: Mean HADS score at observation minus Mean at baseline. HADS anxiety and depression subscale scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater severity of the subscale condition. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Awaken Short of Breath or With a Headache

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Awaken Short of Breath or With a Headache subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of the symptom. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Overall Sleep Problems Index

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Overall Sleep Problems Index subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of overall sleep problems. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Quantity of Sleep

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Quantity of Sleep subscales rated 0 to 24 (number of hours slept). A higher score indicates greater quantity of sleep. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep Adequacy

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Sleep Adequacy subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of sleep adequacy. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Sleep Disturbance

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Sleep Disturbance subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of sleep disturbance. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Snoring

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Snoring subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of snoring. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale at Endpoint- Somnolence

MOS: participant-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Consists of 9-item overall sleep problems index (length of time to fall asleep, how many hours of sleep each night during past 4 weeks); The MOS Somnolence subscales rated 1 (all the time) to 6 (none of the time). Scores are transformed (actual raw score minus lowest possible score) divided by possible raw score range multiplied by 100; total score range = 0 to 100. A higher score indicates greater intensity of somnolence. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Pain Visual Analog Scale (Pain VAS) Score at Endpoint

The pain VAS is a horizontal line; 100 mm in length, self-administered by the patient to rate pain from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). The score indicates the pain intensity during the past 1 week before a visit. Change = mean scores at observation minus mean scores at baseline. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Change From Baseline in Sleep Quality Score at Endpoint

Change: Mean sleep quality score at endpoint minus mean at baseline. Sleep quality scores range from 0-10 with higher scores indicating decreased sleep quality. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Baseline, Week 15 or study discontinuation

Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Sleep Scale - Number of Participants With Optimal Sleep at Endpoint

MOS-Sleep is a patient-rated questionnaire to assess sleep quality and quantity. Optimal sleep component is derived from Sleep Quantity average hours of sleep each night during the past 4 weeks. Optimal sleep was defined as sleep quantity of 7 or 8 hours per night. (NCT00830167)
Timeframe: Week 15 or study discontinuation

Reviews

23 reviews available for gamma-aminobutyric acid and Sleep Wake Disorders

Trials

29 trials available for gamma-aminobutyric acid and Sleep Wake Disorders

Other Studies

34 other studies available for gamma-aminobutyric acid and Sleep Wake Disorders