gadoxetic-acid-disodium and Eosinophilia

To examine the differential features of focal eosinophilic liver disease (FELD) from liver metastases on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.. Twenty patients with 41 FELD and 20 patients with 55 metastases were enrolled in this study. Liver MRI consisted of precontrast 2D T1-weighted image (T1WI) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced 3D T1WI (arterial, portal, 20 min hepatocyte-selective phases), and a postcontrast T2WI. Images were analyzed for the margin and shape of the lesions; lesion conspicuity on T1- and T2WI; signal intensity of the lesions on 3D T1WI; presence of rim enhancement and misty signs; and presence of significant smaller lesions on the unenhanced T1WI (<50%) compared to hepatocyte phase image.. Univariate analysis revealed the following significant parameters to favor FELD: a fuzzy margin, irregular shape, subtle signal intensity changes on T1- and T2WI, absence of target signs on the hepatocyte phase image, presence of misty signs, and size discrepancies on T1WI and hepatocyte phase images. Multivariate analysis revealed only a significantly smaller lesion size on T1WI compared to hepatocyte phase images to be predictive of FELD.. A significantly smaller lesion size on T1WI relative to hepatocyte phase image is the best predictor for identifying FELD on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biopsy, Needle; Chi-Square Distribution; Contrast Media; Diagnosis, Differential; Eosinophilia; Female; Gadolinium DTPA; Humans; Liver Diseases; Liver Neoplasms; Logistic Models; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Predictive Value of Tests; Retrospective Studies; Sensitivity and Specificity

The purpose of this study was to describe magnetic resonance (MR) findings of focal eosinophilic liver disease using gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA).. Nineteen patients (M:F=14:5; age range, 26-66 years; mean age, 50 years) with 35 focal eosinophilic liver lesions were included after reviewing the medical records of 482 patients who underwent Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MR imaging (MRI) on a 3.0-T unit between April 2008 and June 2009. The diagnosis of focal eosinophilic liver disease was established by means of percutaneous liver biopsy or surgery and consistent clinical findings. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed MR images with consensus. Margin, shape and distribution of the lesions were analyzed. We also evaluated signal intensity of focal hepatic lesions on T(1)- and T(2)-weighted images and patterns of enhancement in dynamic contrast study.. The mean diameter of the lesions was 1.7 cm (range, 0.7-6.1 cm). Most of the focal eosinophilic liver lesions [n=31/35 (88.6%)] had poorly defined margins. They were usually isointense or slightly hypointense [n=34/35 (97.2%)] on T(1)-weighted images and hyperintense [n=32/35 (91.4%)] on T(2)-weighted images. Dynamic study showed enhancement (rim or homogeneous) on the arterial phase [n=21/35 (60%)] and hypointensity on the late venous phase [n=31/35 (88.6%)]. All the lesions were hypointense on the hepatobiliary phase images.. Focal eosinophilic liver lesions tend to be hyperintense on the arterial phase and hypointense on the late venous phase during dynamic study of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI. Although these findings mimic other focal hepatic lesions, poorly defined margins of the lesions and peripheral eosinophilia might help distinguish focal eosinophilic liver disease from other hepatic lesions.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biopsy; Contrast Media; Eosinophilia; Female; Gadolinium DTPA; Humans; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Liver; Liver Diseases; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Male; Middle Aged; Retrospective Studies