gadofluorine-m and Brain-Neoplasms

To compare conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques (T2-w and Gadolinium-DTPA-enhanced T1-w images) and Gadofluorine-M (GfM), a novel contrast agent in MRI, in murine gliomas.. Growth monitoring of murine gliomas (induced in mice) was performed on a 2.3 Tesla Bruker Biospec MRI unit. First all animals were investigated with conventional MRI techniques. In group I GfM was applied at an early stage of disease, in group II at a later stage. After injection of GfM follow-up MRI was performed without further injection of contrast agent. On MR images tumor size and signal intensities were assessed. Animals were killed for histological evaluation.. In both groups GfM delineated tumor extents larger and more precisely than conventional MRI techniques. The difference between GfM and conventional MRI techniques reached level of significance at both tumor stages. Follow-up MRI after singular injection of GfM showed persistence of GfM in tumor tissue. On tissue sections GfM-enhancing areas corresponded closely to vital tumor tissue. GfM showed a mainly intracellular accumulation.. Application of GfM resulted in superior delineation of experimental glioma compared with conventional MRI techniques. Thus, GfM bears a high potential in clinical application.

Topics: Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Contrast Media; Female; Fluorocarbons; Gadolinium DTPA; Glioma; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mice; Organometallic Compounds; Staining and Labeling; Tumor Cells, Cultured

Gadofluorine is a novel macrocyclic, amphiphilic gadolinium-based contrast agent. We found that malignant glioma cells could be labeled in vitro using Gadofluorine without the need for transfection agents or any other additional means. Labeling with Gadofluorine enhanced the visualization of glioma cells in T(1)-weighted sequences, even if the cells had been cultured in medium without Gadofluorine over several days. The intracellular uptake of Gadofluorine was measured and the loss of relevant amounts of Gadofluorine into the cell culture medium was ruled out by MRI. Confocal laser fluorescence microscopy revealed Cy-5-labeled Gadofluorine in the perinuclear cytoplasmic region, but neither within the nucleus nor bound to the cell membrane. Adverse effects of cellular Gadofluorine uptake were ruled out by proliferation and migration assays. Finally, in vivo analyses provided good visibility of labeled glioma cells in T(1)-weighted sequences after intracerebral injection in mice for more than 2 weeks. We thus conclude that Gadofluorine can easily be used to label glioma cells in vitro without affecting glioma cell biology. Gadofluorine provides an interesting alternative for cellular labeling if iron oxide particles are incorporated insufficiently by target cells or if the vicinity of susceptibility artifacts prohibits the use of signal-decreasing contrast agents.

Topics: Animals; Brain Neoplasms; Cell Line, Tumor; Cell Movement; Cell Proliferation; Contrast Media; Fluorocarbons; Gadolinium DTPA; Glioma; In Vitro Techniques; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Mice; Mice, Nude; Microscopy, Confocal; Organometallic Compounds