g(m2)-ganglioside and Sarcoma

Recurrence after resection of metastatic sarcoma is common. The gangliosides GM2, GD2 and GD3 are strongly expressed across sarcoma subtypes. We hypothesised that generation of anti-ganglioside antibodies would control micrometastases and improve outcomes in sarcoma patients who were disease-free after metastasectomy.. We conducted a randomised phase II trial of the immunological adjuvant OPT-821 with a KLH-conjugated ganglioside vaccine targeting GM2, GD2 and GD3, versus OPT-821 alone in patients with metastatic sarcoma following complete metastasectomy. Patients received 10 subcutaneous injections at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 8, 16, 28, 40, 52, 68 and 84 and were followed for evidence of recurrent disease. The primary end-point was relapse-free survival. Secondary end-points included overall survival and serologic response.. A total of 136 patients were randomised, 68 to each arm. The mean age was 51.2, 52.2% were male, 90.4% had relapsed disease, 86.8% had high-grade tumours and 14% had ≥4 metastases resected. Histologies included leiomyosarcoma (33%), spindle cell sarcoma (14%), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (13%), osteosarcoma (10%), synovial sarcoma (9%), liposarcoma (9%) and others (12%). Most adverse events were Grade ≤2 (83.8% and 70.6% in the vaccine and adjuvant arms, respectively). The most common (≥20% of patients) were injection site reaction (89.7%), fatigue (44.1%) and pyrexia (27.9%) on the vaccine arm, and injection site reaction (69.1%) on the adjuvant only arm. The 1-year relapse-free survival rate (34.5% and 34.8% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively) did not differ between arms (P = 0.725). One-year overall survival rates were 93.1% and 91.5% in the vaccine and OPT-821 monotherapy arm, respectively (P = 0.578). Serologic responses at week 9 were more frequent on the vaccine arm (96.5% of patients) than in the adjuvant arm (32.8%), and the difference between groups was durable.. A sustained serologic response to vaccination was induced with the vaccine, but no difference in recurrence-free or overall survival was observed between treatment arms.. gov identifier: NCT01141491.

Topics: Adjuvants, Immunologic; Female; G(M2) Ganglioside; Humans; Injection Site Reaction; Male; Neoplasms, Second Primary; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Vaccines

Immunization with GMK vaccine (G(M2) ganglioside conjugated to keyhole limpet hemocyanin mixed with QS-21 adjuvant) induces anti-G(M2) antibodies in close to 100% of patients. We found previously that anti-G(D2) antibodies could be induced in some patients using G(D2)-keyhole limpet hemocyanin + QS-21 (GDK). In this trial, we wished: (a) to determine whether immunization with both GMK and GDK vaccines could induce antibodies against both G(M2) and G(D2); and (b) to determine the optimal dose of GDK. Thirty-one patients with melanoma or sarcoma who had no evidence of disease after complete surgical resection were immunized with both GMK (30 microg of G(M2)) and GDK on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 12, 24, and 36. Patients were assigned to one of five GDK dose levels (3, 10, 30, 70, or 130 microg of G(D2)). Anti-G(M2) IgM or IgG were induced in 97% of patients. The dose of GDK did not affect the anti-G(M2) response, although at the highest GDK dose level, 3 of 7 patients did not make anti-G(M2) IgG. GDK was less immunogenic; overall 45% of patients developed either IgM or IgG against G(D2). At GDK doses of 30 or 70 microg, 8 of 11 patients (73%) made either IgM or IgG anti-G(D2) antibodies. We conclude that both GMK and GDK vaccines can induce antibodies against G(M2) and G(D2) in a majority of patients and are safe. The optimal dose of GDK appears to be either 30 or 70 microg when administered with GMK vaccine.

Topics: Cancer Vaccines; Chromatography, Thin Layer; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay; Female; Flow Cytometry; G(M2) Ganglioside; Gangliosides; Hemocyanins; Humans; Immunoblotting; Immunoglobulin G; Immunoglobulin M; Male; Melanoma; Sarcoma; Secondary Prevention; Time Factors