Page last updated: 2024-08-23

freedom and Minimally Conscious State

freedom has been researched along with Minimally Conscious State in 183 studies

Research

Studies (183)

Timeframe	Studies, this research(%)	All Research%
pre-1990	63 (34.43)	18.7374
1990's	116 (63.39)	18.2507
2000's	2 (1.09)	29.6817
2010's	2 (1.09)	24.3611
2020's	0 (0.00)	2.80

Authors

Authors	Studies
Glick, S; Jotkowitz, A; Zivotofsky, AZ	2
Scoccia, D	1
Eiser, AR; Seiden, DJ	1
de Deyn, PP; Martin, JJ	1
Phipps, EJ	1
O'Connell, LJ; Yeide, H	1
Braithwaite, SS	1
Benes, R; Brobst, K	1
Mahowald, MB	1
Pellegrino, ED	1
Corbett, TE	1
Gillett, G	1
Nimz, MM	1
Di Somma, AV	2
Meisel, A	2
Childress, JF	1
Thompson, LC	1
Savulescu, J	2
Cattorini, P; Reichlin, M	1
Young, EW	1
Greenhouse, L	2
Ackerman, F; Cohen, C; Meisel, A; Silverman, H	1
Atkinson, GM	1
Momeyer, RW	1
Derr, P	1
Rowntree, S	1
Santurri, EN; Werpehowski, W	1
Piccione, JJ	1
Johnson, SH	1
Brock, DW; Buchanan, A	1
Annas, GJ; Glantz, LH	1
Jarrett, C	1
Peters, EA	1
Grant, ER; Koop, CE	1
Dorff, EN	1
Reisner, AI	2
Dickens, BM	1
Allsopp, ME	1
Cotler, M	1
Franklin, C; Weil, MH	1
Humber, JM	1
Watson, DE	1
Dyck, AJ	2
Cranford, R; Gostin, L	1
van der Wal, G	1
Hubbard, H	1
McCarthy, JJ	1
Stone, J	1
Adams, CR; Adams, CT	1
Mulholland, KA	1
Matthews, MA	1
Kutner, L	1
Herlan, ER	1
Cox, SE	1
Callahan, D	1
Dresser, R	2
Kass, LR	1
Harty-Golder, B; Morgan, R	1
Francis, LP	2
Harvey, JC; Johnson, SH; Quinn, KP	1
Ellman, IM	1
Lomasky, LE	1
Robertson, JA	3
Kamisar, Y	1
Raffin, TA	1
Avila, D; Bopp, J	1
O'Connell, KJ; Paris, JJ	1
Grondelski, JM	1
McCormick, RA	1
Feinberg, J	1
Ayres, SM	1
Dossetor, JB	1
Singer, PA	1
Quay, PM	1
Stanley, JM	1
Ifrah, AJ	1
Richards, N	1
Rich, BA	2
Lerner, MJ	1
Kadish, SH	1
Ronzetti, TA	1
Blake, DC; Maldonado, L; Meinhardt, RA	1
Hoefler, JM; Kamoie, BE	1
Callahan, D; Cassell, E; Lysaught, MT; May, WE; Meilaender, G; Smith, WB; Whitbeck, C	1
Daar, JF	1
Hoehne, JL	1
Gomez, CF	1
Mehrle, JP	1
Lieberson, A	1
Churchill, LR	1
Winslade, WJ	1
Dworkin, R	1
McCormick, R	1
Winkelstein, P	1
Lynn, J	1
Goldberg, CK	1
Mendelson, D	1
Snider, GL	1
Broder, AJ; Cranford, RE	1
Hirshman, LR	1
Bleich, JD	2
Feenan, D	1
Morris, A	1
Benton, EC	1
Finnis, J	1
Patterson, EG	1
Cohen-Almagor, R	1
Miller, BW	1
Shiner, K	1
Grubb, A	1
Coleman, G	1
Cantor, NL	2
Schneiderman, LJ	1
Blustein, J	1
Kuczewski, MG	2
Urofsky, MI	1
Buchanan, A	1
Keown, J	1
Magnusson, R	1
Orentlicher, D	1
Jessop, DS	1
Rakowski, E	1
Baron, CH	1
Day, K	1
Colabrese, CA	1
Appelbaum, PS; Klein, JI	1
Rubin, BL	1
Ramsey, P	1
Peterson, GW	1
Thomasma, DC	1
Weinberg, JK	1
Richard, SM	1
Cahill, LS	1
Harmon, L	1
Banja, JD	1
Evans, D; Kovacs, J	1
Flick, MR	1
Helme, T; Padfield, N	1
Walter, JJ	1
Machler, S	1
HarveyParedes, T	1
Gula, R	1
McCoy, AG	1
Griffiths, J	1
Smith, K; Wilson, W	1
Freeman, CW	1
Buchanan, AE	1
Biggs, H	1
Lang, JA; Seltzer, MM	1
Paris, JJ	1

Reviews

4 review(s) available for freedom and Minimally Conscious State

Article	Year
Ethical issues of life and death: a review article. Thought, 1982, Volume: 57, Issue:227 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Altruism; Animal Rights; Animals; Beneficence; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Double Effect Principle; Ethical Analysis; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Infant; Infanticide; Intention; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Motivation; Pain; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Risk; Risk Assessment; Suicide; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1982
Deciding for others. The Milbank quarterly, 1986, Volume: 64, Issue:Suppl. 2 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Chronic Disease; Cognition; Communication; Comprehension; Decision Making; Dementia; Disclosure; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Ethics, Professional; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Human Rights; Humans; Informed Consent; Interpersonal Relations; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Mental Disorders; Mental Processes; Mental Status Schedule; Paternalism; Patient Care; Patient Compliance; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prevalence; Prognosis; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Statistics as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1986
Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions. Syracuse law review, 1988, Volume: 39, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude to Death; Autopsy; Blood Transfusion; Brain Death; Christianity; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Economics; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Indians, North American; Jehovah's Witnesses; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Morals; New Jersey; New York; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Public Policy; Religion; Social Values; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1988
Medical futility and aging: ethical implications. Generations (San Francisco, Calif.), 1994,Winter, Volume: 18, Issue:4 Topics: Consensus; Decision Making; Empathy; Empirical Research; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Goals; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Medicine; Moral Obligations; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Probability; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Research; Resource Allocation; Resuscitation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Terminology as Topic; Treatment Outcome; Truth Disclosure; Uncertainty; Withholding Treatment	1994

Other Studies

179 other study(ies) available for freedom and Minimally Conscious State

Article	Year
The secret of caring for Mr. Golubchuk. The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2010, Volume: 10, Issue:3 Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Canada; Choice Behavior; Cultural Characteristics; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jews; Life Expectancy; Life Support Care; Male; Medical Futility; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician's Role; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	2010
The case of Samuel Golubchuk and the right to live. The American journal of bioethics : AJOB, 2010, Volume: 10, Issue:3 Topics: Aged, 80 and over; Canada; Choice Behavior; Cultural Characteristics; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Enteral Nutrition; Ethics, Clinical; Ethics, Medical; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jews; Life Expectancy; Life Support Care; Male; Manitoba; Medical Futility; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician's Role; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Societies, Medical; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	2010
Slippery-slope objections to legalizing physician-assisted suicide and voluntary euthanasia. Public affairs quarterly, 2005, Volume: 19, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Beneficence; Ethical Theory; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Freedom; Humans; Mental Competency; Netherlands; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Right to Die; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument	2005
Discontinuing dialysis in persistent vegetative state: the roles of autonomy, community, and professional moral agency. American journal of kidney diseases : the official journal of the National Kidney Foundation, 1997, Volume: 30, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Beneficence; Consensus; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Ethicists; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Group Processes; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Medical Futility; Patient Advocacy; Peritoneal Dialysis; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Renal Dialysis; Resource Allocation; Withholding Treatment	1997
[The loss of autonomy in disabling neurologic diseases. Ethical considerations]. Revue medicale de Liege, 1997, Volume: 52, Issue:6 Topics: Brain Death; Cognition; Communication; Dementia; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Muscular Dystrophies; Nervous System Diseases; Patient Advocacy; Persistent Vegetative State; Quadriplegia	1997
Rights: freedom, free will and the individual. NT learning curve, 1998, Mar-04, Volume: 2, Issue:1 Topics: Ethics, Nursing; Fatal Outcome; Freedom; Humans; Male; Patient Advocacy; Persistent Vegetative State; Right to Die; Volition	1998
Revisiting autonomy and informed consent. The Journal of head trauma rehabilitation, 2000, Volume: 15, Issue:5 Topics: Brain Injuries; Decision Making; Ethics, Medical; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Physician-Patient Relations	2000
Missing the point: comments on the case presented by Barbara Edwards Commentary: the many styles of clinical ethics. The Journal of clinical ethics, 1990,Spring, Volume: 1, Issue:1 Topics: Altruism; Beneficence; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Blood Transfusion; Casuistry; Christianity; Decision Making; Education; Ethical Analysis; Ethicists; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Consultation; Ethics, Medical; Ethics, Professional; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Family; Freedom; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Jehovah's Witnesses; Life Support Care; Methods; Organizational Policy; Patient Care Team; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Social Justice; Social Values; Socioeconomic Factors; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1990
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy. Annals of internal medicine, 1991, Sep-15, Volume: 115, Issue:6 Topics: Adult; Advance Directives; Altruism; Beneficence; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Organizational Policy; Patient Participation; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Reference Standards; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Societies; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1991
Anticruelty care: commentary. The Journal of clinical ethics, 1991,Summer, Volume: 2, Issue:2 Topics: Aged; Altruism; Beneficence; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Chronic Disease; Decision Making; Empathy; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Goals; Health Personnel; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medicine; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Pain; Patient Care; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Policy Making; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Restraint, Physical; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1991
Ethics in critical care: practitioners discuss collaborative approaches to decision making. QRB. Quality review bulletin, 1992, Volume: 18, Issue:1 Topics: Adolescent; Advance Directives; Aged; Altruism; Beneficence; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Nurses; Patient Advocacy; Patient Care; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
Futility and unilateral decision making: a different view. Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics : CQ : the international journal of healthcare ethics committees, 1993,Spring, Volume: 2, Issue:2 Topics: Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Goals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Patient Care Team; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Resuscitation; Resuscitation Orders; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1993
Medical ethics. JAMA, 1986, Oct-17, Volume: 256, Issue:15 Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; AIDS Serodiagnosis; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Civil Rights; Confidentiality; Delivery of Health Care; Disabled Persons; Duty to Warn; Economics; Enteral Nutrition; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Fees and Charges; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Health Personnel; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mass Screening; Nutritional Support; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Refusal to Treat; Resource Allocation; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1986
Withholding or withdrawing life-prolonging medical treatment. JAMA, 1986, Nov-21, Volume: 256, Issue:19 Topics: Advance Directives; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1986
Reply to J M Stanley: fiddling and clarity. Journal of medical ethics, 1987, Volume: 13, Issue:1 Topics: Brain Death; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Cadaver; Death; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Self Concept; Social Responsibility	1987
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital. Issues in law & medicine, 1986, Volume: 2, Issue:3 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Massachusetts; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1986
McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises. Issues in law & medicine, 1989,Spring, Volume: 4, Issue:4 Topics: Civil Rights; Connecticut; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
Gray v. Romeo. Issues in law & medicine, 1989,Spring, Volume: 4, Issue:4 Topics: Civil Rights; Conscience; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Rhode Island; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Refusing treatment, refusing to talk, and refusing to let go: on whose terms will death occur? Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine, 1989,Fall, Volume: 17, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Analgesics, Opioid; Communication; Conscience; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Pain; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Public Opinion; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1989
The care of the dying: a symposium on the case of Betty Wright -- Dying patients: who's in control? Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine, 1989,Fall, Volume: 17, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Chronic Disease; Conscience; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Facilities; Health Personnel; Humans; Jurisprudence; Organizational Policy; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
In re Gardner. Issues in law & medicine, 1988,Summer, Volume: 4, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Maine; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1988
The Least Worst Death, by Margaret Pabst Battin. Journal of medical ethics, 1996, Volume: 22, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Coercion; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Counseling; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Germany; Health Care Rationing; Human Rights; Humans; International Cooperation; Internationality; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Justice; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminology as Topic; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1996
Introduction. Theoretical medicine, 1997, Volume: 18, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Cultural Diversity; Decision Making; Europe; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; International Cooperation; Internationality; Mediterranean Region; Paternalism; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; United States	1997
On the bioethics front: the power of the nonrational in demands for marginally beneficial or useless treatments. Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.), 1994, Volume: 20, Issue:2 Topics: Coercion; Consensus; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Economics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Financing, Government; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Health Services Misuse; Humans; Insurance, Health; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Social Justice; Social Values; Social Welfare; Terminal Care; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1994
Right-to-die case gets first hearing in Supreme Court. The New York times on the Web, 1989, Dec-07 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Right to Die; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
Justices find a right to die, but the majority sees need for clear proof of intent. The New York times on the Web, 1990, Jun-26 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1990
Will society defend our right to live? The New York times on the Web, 1991, Jan-31 Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Minnesota; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
Foody v. Manchester Memorial Hospital. Atlantic reporter, 1984, Mar-06, Volume: 482 Topics: Chronic Disease; Civil Rights; Connecticut; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Multiple Sclerosis; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1984
In re Estate of Dorone. Atlantic reporter, 1985, Dec-27, Volume: 502 Topics: Administrative Personnel; Adult; Advance Directives; Blood Transfusion; Christianity; Civil Rights; Critical Illness; Emergency Medical Services; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Jehovah's Witnesses; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Mental Competency; Parents; Pennsylvania; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Religion; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life	1985
In re Jobes. Atlantic reporter, 1987, Jun-24, Volume: 529 Topics: Adult; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; New Jersey; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1987
In re Gardner. Atlantic reporter, 1987, Dec-03, Volume: 534 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Maine; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1987
Gray v. Romeo. Federal supplement, 1988, Oct-17, Volume: 697 Topics: Attitude; Civil Rights; Conscience; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patient Transfer; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Rhode Island; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1988
McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut Atlantic reporter, 1989, Jan-31, Volume: 553 Topics: Attitude; Civil Rights; Connecticut; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
In re Fiori. Atlantic reporter, 1995, Jan-17, Volume: 652 Topics: Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Pennsylvania; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1995
In re Fiori. Atlantic reporter, 1996, Apr-02, Volume: 673 Topics: Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Pennsylvania; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1996
In re Tavel. Atlantic reporter, 1995, Aug-02, Volume: 661 Topics: Aged; Decision Making; Delaware; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1995
Deciding for others. The Linacre quarterly, 1983, Volume: 50, Issue:1 Topics: Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Ethicists; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Human Characteristics; Humans; Infant; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physician-Patient Relations; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Resuscitation Orders; Social Responsibility; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1983
Medical decisions concerning noncompetent patients. Theoretical medicine, 1983, Volume: 4, Issue:3 Topics: Adolescent; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Minors; Paternalism; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1983
Who shall live? who shall die? who shall play God? Some reflections on euthanasia. Thought, 1982, Volume: 57, Issue:227 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Aged; Beginning of Human Life; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Human Characteristics; Humans; Individuality; Infant, Newborn; Life; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Resuscitation Orders; Self Concept; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1982
Substituted judgment and the terminally-ill incompetent. Thought, 1982, Volume: 57, Issue:227 Topics: Altruism; Beneficence; Decision Making; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1982
The tradition of care. The Euthanasia review, 1986,Summer, Volume: 1, Issue:2 Topics: Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Nutritional Support; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Physician-Patient Relations; Privacy; Quality of Life; Social Responsibility; Terminally Ill; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1986
The Death-Prolonging Procedures Act and refusal of treatment in Missouri. Saint Louis University law journal, 1986, Volume: 30, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Facilities; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Professional Misconduct; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; State Government; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1986
The right of elderly patients to refuse life-sustaining treatment. The Milbank quarterly, 1986, Volume: 64, Issue:Suppl. 2 Topics: Adult; Advance Directives; Aged; Blood Transfusion; Christianity; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Dementia; Euthanasia, Passive; Female; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Informed Consent; Jehovah's Witnesses; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Male; Mental Competency; Patient Advocacy; Patient Compliance; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Social Values; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1986
Moral reasoning and legal change: observations on the termination of medical treatment and the development of law. Rutgers law journal, 1988,Summer, Volume: 19, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Biomedical Technology; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Intention; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Morals; Motivation; New Jersey; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Prognosis; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Suicide; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1988
The care and treatment of the terminally ill: questions raised by McConnell v. Beverly Enterprises-Connecticut, Inc. Connecticut law review, 1989,Spring, Volume: 21, Issue:3 Topics: Conflict of Interest; Connecticut; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Employment; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Financial Support; Freedom; Group Processes; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Lawyers; Legal Guardians; Life Support Care; Nurses; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Patient Care; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Politics; Professional-Family Relations; Stress, Psychological; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1989
The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing. Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy, 1986,Spring, Volume: 2, Issue:3 Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain Death; Chronic Disease; Death; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Policy Making; Politics; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1986
A Jewish approach to end-stage medical care. Conservative Judaism, 1991,Spring, Volume: 43, Issue:3 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Altruism; Beginning of Human Life; Beneficence; Biomedical Technology; Decision Making; Dementia; Double Effect Principle; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Hospices; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Life; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Religion; Resource Allocation; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Theology; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1991
Mai beinaihu? Conservative Judaism, 1991,Spring, Volume: 43, Issue:3 Topics: Double Effect Principle; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Judaism; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Religion; Resuscitation Orders; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Theology; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
A halakhic ethic of care for the terminally ill. Conservative Judaism, 1991,Spring, Volume: 43, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Biomedical Technology; Dehydration; Double Effect Principle; Ethical Relativism; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Fluid Therapy; Freedom; Hospices; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Judaism; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Pain; Pastoral Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Probability; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Religion; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Theology; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Uncertainty; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1991
Medical priority of patients' wishes. Humane medicine, 1991,Winter, Volume: 7, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Blood Transfusion; Canada; Christianity; Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jehovah's Witnesses; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; New York; Ontario; Patient Advocacy; Patient Rights; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Religion; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
From Quinlan to Cruzan: patterns in the fabric of US "right-to-die" case law. Humane medicine, 1992, Volume: 8, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; History; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
Forgoing medical treatment: to withdraw, withhold, deny. Seminars in anesthesia, 1991, Volume: 10, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Anesthesia; Communication; Conscience; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; General Surgery; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Patient Participation; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Quality of Life; Resuscitation Orders; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; State Government; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
When critically ill patients refuse life-sustaining care. Seminars in anesthesia, 1991, Volume: 10, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Intensive Care Units; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
Statutory criteria for determining human death. Mercer law review, 1991,Spring, Volume: 42, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Brain; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Heart; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Policy Making; Public Policy; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Social Change; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument	1991
Cruzan and the right to die: a perspective on privacy interests. Mercer law review, 1991,Spring, Volume: 42, Issue:3 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
Being a physician and being ethical. The Linacre quarterly, 1992, Volume: 59, Issue:3 Topics: Christianity; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Love; Massachusetts; Moral Obligations; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Philosophy; Physicians; Privacy; Religion; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Theology; Value of Life; Virtues; Withholding Treatment	1992
Futility: a concept in search of a definition. Law, medicine & health care : a publication of the American Society of Law & Medicine, 1992,Winter, Volume: 20, Issue:4 Topics: Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Human Rights; Humans; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Social Values; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1992
Unrequested termination of life: is it permissible? Bioethics, 1993, Volume: 7, Issue:4 Topics: Altruism; Beneficence; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Family; Freedom; Humans; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Netherlands; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Statistics as Topic; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Terminology as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1993
What role for surrogate decision makers? Origins, 1993, Feb-04, Volume: 22, Issue:34 Topics: Advance Directives; Catholicism; Clergy; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Personnel; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; New York; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Public Policy; Reference Standards; Social Justice; Social Welfare; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1993
Caring for the critically ill patient in a persistent vegetative state: must nutritional and hydration support always be provided? The Linacre quarterly, 1994, Volume: 61, Issue:2 Topics: Brain Death; Casuistry; Catholicism; Critical Illness; Death; Decision Making; Dehumanization; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Interpersonal Relations; Motivation; Narration; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Risk; Risk Assessment; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1994
Advance directives, autonomy and unintended death. Bioethics, 1994, Volume: 8, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Coercion; Cognition; Comprehension; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Family; Forms and Records Control; Freedom; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Humans; Intention; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Motivation; Nursing Homes; Organizational Policy; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Quality of Life; Records; Resuscitation Orders; Terminally Ill; Terminology as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1994
An overview of Georgia's living will legislation. Mercer law review, 1984, Volume: 36 Topics: Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Georgia; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1984
A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity. Indiana law review, 1987,Fall, Volume: 20, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Conflict of Interest; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetal Viability; Fetus; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1987
Suicidal competence and the patient's right to refuse lifesaving treatment. California law review, 1987, Volume: 75, Issue:2 Topics: Civil Rights; Critical Illness; Disabled Persons; Enteral Nutrition; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Intention; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Quality of Life; Religion; Right to Die; Suicide; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1987
The living will: the epitome of human dignity in coping with the historical event of death. University of Detroit law review, 1987,Summer, Volume: 64, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patient Advocacy; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Societies; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1987
Maine's living will act and the termination of life-sustaining medical procedures. Maine law review, 1987, Volume: 39, Issue:1 Topics: Chronic Disease; Civil Rights; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Intention; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Maine; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Values; State Government; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1987
Government as arbiter, not custodian: relational privacy as foundation for a right to refuse medical treatment prolonging incompetents' lives. New Mexico law review, 1988,Winter, Volume: 18, Issue:1 Topics: Cadaver; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Family Relations; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Privacy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1988
Vital distinctions, mortal questions: debating euthanasia and health care costs. Commonweal (New York, N.Y.), 1988, Jul-15, Volume: 115, Issue:13 Topics: Biomedical Technology; Brain Death; Chronic Disease; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Financial Support; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Homicide; Humans; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1988
Life, death, and incompetent patients: conceptual infirmities and hidden values in the law. Arizona law review, 1986, Volume: 28, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Economics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1986
USCC brief in Nancy Cruzan case: continued nutrition and hydration urged. Origins, 1989, Oct-26, Volume: 19, Issue:21 Topics: Catholicism; Civil Rights; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment; Wrongful Life	1989
Death with dignity and the sanctity of life. Commentary (New York, N.Y.), 1990, Volume: 89, Issue:3 Topics: Attitude to Death; Capital Punishment; Coercion; Dehumanization; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Human Characteristics; Human Rights; Humanism; Humans; Individuality; Interpersonal Relations; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Morals; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Policy Making; Religion; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Virtues	1990
Constitutional development of judicial criteria in right-to-die cases: from brain dead to persistent vegetative state. Wake Forest law review, 1988,Spring, Volume: 23, Issue:4 Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; History; Human Rights; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Minors; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Religion; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1988
The evanescence of living wills. Real property, probate, and trust journal, 1989,Spring, Volume: 24, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Chronic Disease; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1989
When should the state step aside? Terminating treatment for PVS victims. Commonweal (New York, N.Y.), 1990, May-04, Volume: 117, Issue:9 Topics: Advance Directives; Catholicism; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1990
Cruzan v. Harmon and the dangerous claim that others can exercise an incapacitated patient's right to die. Jurimetrics, 1989,Summer, Volume: 29, Issue:4 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1989
Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin? Reason, 1990, Volume: 22, Issue:6 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Family Relations; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; Social Values; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1990
Cruzan and the constitutional status of nontreatment decisions for incompetent patients. Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966), 1991,Summer, Volume: 25, Issue:5 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Policy Making; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
When is there a constitutional "right to die"? When is there no constitutional "right to live" Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966), 1991,Summer, Volume: 25, Issue:5 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Death; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Food; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1991
Assessing quality of life: a response to Professor Kamisar. Georgia law review (Athens, Ga. : 1966), 1991,Summer, Volume: 25, Issue:5 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Dementia; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Human Experimentation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
Withholding and withdrawing life support. Hospital practice, 1991, Mar-15, Volume: 26, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Altruism; Beneficence; Chronic Disease; Communication; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Patient Care Team; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Social Justice; Stress, Psychological; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
Perspectives on Cruzan: the sirens' lure of invented consent -- a critique of autonomy-based surrogate decisionmaking for legally-incapacitated older persons. The Hastings law journal, 1991, Volume: 42, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Altruism; Beneficence; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Informed Consent; Intention; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Physicians; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
The Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. Clinical ethics report, 1991, Volume: 5, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Communication; Decision Making; Education; Euthanasia, Passive; Federal Government; Freedom; Government; Government Regulation; Health Facilities; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Organizational Policy; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States	1991
Removal of artificially supplied nutrition and hydration: a moral analysis. The Irish theological quarterly, 1989, Volume: 55, Issue:4 Topics: Catholicism; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Interpersonal Relations; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Privacy; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Responsibility; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1989
Physician-assisted suicide: flight from compassion. Christian century (Chicago, Ill. : 1902), 1991, Dec-04, Volume: 108, Issue:35 Topics: Aged; Attitude; Economics; Empathy; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Life Support Care; Love; Nutritional Support; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physician's Role; Physicians; Public Opinion; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Trust; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
Overlooking the merits of the individual case: an unpromising approach to the right to die. Ratio juris, 1991, Volume: 4, Issue:2 Topics: Accidents, Traffic; Alcoholism; Altruism; Beneficence; Capital Punishment; Civil Rights; Criminal Law; Decision Making; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Government Regulation; Homicide; Human Rights; Humans; Immunization; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Policy Making; Public Health; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Change; Social Control, Formal; Social Justice; Social Values; Stress, Psychological; Supreme Court Decisions; Terminally Ill; United States; Value of Life; Wounds and Injuries	1991
Who decides when care is futile? Hospital practice, 1991, Sep-30, Volume: 26, Issue:9A Topics: Altruism; Beneficence; Burns; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Patient Care Team; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Resuscitation Orders; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1991
Withdrawal of treatment: is it ever justifiable? Humane medicine, 1991, Volume: 7, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Canada; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Intention; Jurisprudence; Medical Futility; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Pain; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Resuscitation Orders; Social Responsibility; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminology as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1991
The case of Nancy Cruzan, the Patient Self-Determination Act and advance directives in Canada. Humane medicine, 1991, Volume: 7, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude; Canada; Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Federal Government; Freedom; Government; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Missouri; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
The sacredness of the human person: cessation of treatment. The Linacre quarterly, 1992, Volume: 59, Issue:1 Topics: Catholicism; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Responsibility; Stress, Psychological; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1992
The Appleton International Conference: Developing guidelines for decisions to forgo life-prolonging medical treatment -- Preamble, Parts I, II, III, and IV. Journal of medical ethics, 1992, Volume: 18, Issue:Suppl Topics: Adolescent; Advance Directives; Altruism; Beneficence; Decision Making; Economics; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Guidelines as Topic; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; International Cooperation; Internationality; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Minors; Moral Obligations; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Welfare; Terminal Care; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1992
The living will. Journal of halacha and contemporary society, 1992,Fall, Volume: No. 24 Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Conscience; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Facilities; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Living Wills; New Jersey; New York; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patient Transfer; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Withholding Treatment	1992
Surrogate consent. Public affairs quarterly, 1992, Volume: 6, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Paternalism; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Policy Making; Public Policy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1992
The values history: a new standard of care. Emory law journal, 1991,Fall, Volume: 40, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Compensation and Redress; Decision Making; Economics; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Individuality; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Paternalism; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Reference Standards; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Social Values; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wrongful Life	1991
State natural death acts: illusory protection of individuals' life-sustaining treatment decisions. Harvard journal on legislation, 1992,Winter, Volume: 29, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Living Wills; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
Letting patients die: legal and moral reflections. California law review, 1992, Volume: 80, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Dementia; Disabled Persons; Empathy; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Informed Consent; Intention; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Motivation; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Control, Formal; Social Desirability; State Government; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1992
Constituting family and death through the struggle with state power: Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. University of Miami law review, 1991, Volume: 46, Issue:1 Topics: Attitude to Death; Death; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Family Relations; Freedom; Government Regulation; Group Processes; Hospitals; Humans; Individuality; Interpersonal Relations; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Missouri; New York; Nutritional Support; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Politics; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Single Person; Social Control, Formal; Social Dominance; Social Values; State Government; Stress, Psychological; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
Bioethics and the law: the case of Helga Wanglie: a clash at the bedside -- medically futile treatment v. patient autonomy. Whittier law review, 1993, Volume: 14 Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Casuistry; Consensus; Death; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethical Analysis; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Goals; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prejudice; Probability; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Uncertainty; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1993
The right to die: state courts lead where legislatures fear to tread. Law & policy, 1992, Volume: 14, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Biomedical Technology; Civil Rights; Delivery of Health Care; Euthanasia, Passive; Federal Government; Financial Support; Freedom; Government; Humans; Informed Consent; Insurance, Health; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Medicaid; Medicare; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Public Policy; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
The sanctity of life seduced: a symposium on medical ethics. First things (New York, N.Y.), 1994, Volume: 42 Topics: Attitude to Death; Biomedical Technology; Chronic Disease; Dementia; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Intention; Life Support Care; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Religion; Risk; Risk Assessment; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1994
A clash at the bedside: patient autonomy v. a physician's professional conscience. The Hastings law journal, 1993, Volume: 44, Issue:6 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Advisory Committees; Aged; American Medical Association; Conscience; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Guidelines as Topic; Hospitals; Human Rights; Humans; Infant; Jurisprudence; Lawyers; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Moral Obligations; Nursing Homes; Patient Transfer; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Professional Autonomy; Public Policy; Refusal to Treat; Resuscitation; Social Responsibility; Societies; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1993
Physician responsibility and the right to "death care": the call for physician-assisted suicide. Drake law review, 1993, Volume: 42, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Federal Government; Freedom; Government; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Mental Competency; Organizational Policy; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Right to Die; Societies; State Government; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1993
Reaping the whirlwind: the Dutch experience with euthanasia. Bioethics forum, 1994,Spring, Volume: 10, Issue:2 Topics: Adolescent; Depressive Disorder; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Guidelines as Topic; Homicide; Humans; Informed Consent; Intention; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Minors; Motivation; Netherlands; Pain; Palliative Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Social Control, Formal; Societies; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; United States; Withholding Treatment	1994
Beyond theological conflict in the courts: the issue of assisted suicide. Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy, 1995, Volume: 9, Issue:2 Topics: Canada; Civil Rights; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Human Rights; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Moral Obligations; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Philosophy; Physicians; Privacy; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Welfare; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Theology; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1995
DeGrella v. Elston: Kentucky Supreme Court rules on an incompetent's right to die. Northern Kentucky law review, 1994,Winter, Volume: 21, Issue:2 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Kentucky; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1994
A comprehensive look at Connecticut's living will statute. The Connecticut probate law journal, 1992, Volume: 7, Issue:1 Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Connecticut; Decision Making; Dementia; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Forms and Records Control; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Minors; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Prognosis; Records; Reference Standards; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
Trust, autonomy, and advance directives. Journal of religion and health, 1989,Fall, Volume: 28, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Attitude; Bioethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Human Characteristics; Humans; Interpersonal Relations; Jurisprudence; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Right to Die; Social Values; Treatment Refusal; Trust; Virtues; Withholding Treatment	1989
Posthumous reproduction. Indiana law journal (Indianapolis, Ind. : 1926), 1994,Fall, Volume: 69, Issue:4 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Brain Death; Cadaver; Cesarean Section; Civil Rights; Cryopreservation; Death; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Embryo Transfer; Embryo, Mammalian; Fathers; Fertilization in Vitro; Fetus; Freedom; Government Regulation; Group Processes; Humans; Insemination, Artificial; Jurisprudence; Labor, Obstetric; Life Support Care; Ownership; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Posthumous Conception; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Public Policy; Reproduction; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Single Person; Social Control, Formal; Spermatozoa; Spouses; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Tissue Banks; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1994
Irreconcilable conflicts in bioethics. Bioethics forum, 1995,Fall, Volume: 11, Issue:3 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Dissent and Disputes; Emotions; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Group Processes; Humans; Individuality; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Politics; Probability; Public Policy; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Uncertainty; Value of Life	1995
The right to death. The New York review of books, 1991, Jan-31 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Missouri; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1991
Technology, the consistent ethic and assisted suicide. Origins, 1995, Dec-21, Volume: 25, Issue:27 Topics: Attitude; Biomedical Technology; Catholicism; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Economics; Education, Medical; Empathy; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Facilities, Proprietary; Homicide; Hospices; Hospitals, Religious; Humans; Life Support Care; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Pain; Palliative Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Poverty; Refusal to Treat; Social Change; Social Justice; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Value of Life; Violence; Withholding Treatment	1995
Negotiating towards death. Sh'ma : a journal of Jewish responsibility, 1996, Feb-16, Volume: 26, Issue:508 Topics: Anencephaly; Consensus; Cultural Diversity; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Emergency Medical Services; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Group Processes; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mothers; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Physicians; Politics; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Social Values; United States; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1996
Is there a place for active euthanasia in palliative care. Journal of palliative care, 1988, Volume: 4, Issue:1 and 2 Topics: Aged; Coercion; Communication; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Dementia; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Pain; Palliative Care; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1988
Medico-legal aspects of the 'right to die' legislation in Australia. Melbourne University law review, 1993, Volume: 19, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Australia; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Pain; Palliative Care; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Right to Die; Suicide; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1993
Withholding and withdrawing life-sustaining therapy: all systems are not yet "go" American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine, 1995, Volume: 151, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude; Communication; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Societies; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1995
"Mary, Mary, quite contrary, how was I to know?" Michael Martin, absolute prescience, and the right to die in Michigan. University of Detroit Mercy law review, 1995,Summer, Volume: 72, Issue:4 Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Advance Directives; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Cognition; Comprehension; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Dissent and Disputes; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Group Processes; Humans; Intention; Interpersonal Relations; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Michigan; Minors; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1995
The philosophy of personal identity and the life and death cases. Chicago-Kent law review, 1992, Volume: 68, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Narration; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent	1992
Treatment of the terminally ill. Tradition (Rabbinical Council of America), 1996,Spring, Volume: 30, Issue:3 Topics: Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Homicide; Humans; Judaism; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Nutritional Support; Pain; Palliative Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Social Responsibility; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1996
A "terrible beauty", the Irish Supreme Court, and dying. European journal of health law, 1996, Volume: 3, Issue:1 Topics: Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Catholicism; Chronic Disease; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Group Processes; Hospitals; Humans; Ireland; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Politics; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1996
The "right to die": a case study in American lawmaking. European journal of health law, 1996, Volume: 3, Issue:1 Topics: Adult; Advance Directives; Advisory Committees; Aged; Civil Rights; Consensus; Decision Making; Democracy; Dissent and Disputes; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Federal Government; Freedom; Government; Group Processes; History; History, 20th Century; Humans; Infant; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Politics; Privacy; Prognosis; Public Policy; Reference Standards; Resuscitation Orders; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Societies; State Government; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1996
Life and death decisions: "Die, my dear doctor? That's the last thing I shall do! European journal of health law, 1996, Volume: 3, Issue:1 Topics: Adult; Advance Directives; Blood Transfusion; Cesarean Section; Christianity; Coercion; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Infant; Informed Consent; Jehovah's Witnesses; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Paternalism; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Professional Autonomy; Professional Competence; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Societies; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1996
The constitutionality of pregnancy clauses in living will statutes. Vanderbilt law review, 1990, Volume: 43, Issue:6 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Beginning of Human Life; California; Child, Unwanted; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Federal Government; Fetal Viability; Fetus; Florida; Freedom; Government; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Right to Die; State Government; Stress, Psychological; Terminally Ill; United States; Withholding Treatment	1990
The "value of human life" and "the right to death": some reflections on Cruzan and Ronald Dworkin. Southern Illinois University law journal. Southern Illinois University at Carbondale. School of Law, 1993,Spring, Volume: 17 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; History, 20th Century; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Social Values; Suicide; Supreme Court Decisions; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1993
Futility guidelines: a resource for decisions about withholding and withdrawing treatment. NCCE news, 1994,Summer, Volume: 2, Issue:3 insert Topics: Advance Directives; Communication; Consensus; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Goals; Guidelines as Topic; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Medical Futility; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patient Care Team; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Prognosis; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Social Values; Terminally Ill; Terminology as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1994
The roles of the family in making health care decisions for incompetent patients. Utah law review, 1992, Volume: 1992, Issue:3 Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Child; Civil Rights; Conflict of Interest; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Family Relations; Freedom; Humans; Infant; Infant, Newborn; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Minors; Parental Consent; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Outcome; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1992
Human rights and human life: an uneven fit. Tulane law review, 1994, Volume: 68, Issue:6 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Anencephaly; Beginning of Human Life; Brain Death; Cadaver; Civil Rights; Death; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Individuality; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Life; Mental Competency; Minors; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Quality of Life; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1994
Autonomy, life as an intrinsic value, and the right to die in dignity. Science and engineering ethics, 1995, Volume: 1, Issue:3 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Aged; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Terminology as Topic; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1995
A time to kill: Ronald Dworkin and the ethics of euthanasia. Res publica (Liverpool, England), 1996, Volume: 2, Issue:1 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Morals; Motivation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Social Justice; Suicide, Assisted; Value of Life; Wedge Argument	1996
Medical futility: a futile concept? Washington and Lee law review, 1996, Volume: 53, Issue:2 Topics: Anencephaly; Brain Death; Consensus; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Group Processes; Health Care Rationing; Hospitals; Human Rights; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Patient Transfer; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physician's Role; Physicians; Politics; Refusal to Treat; Resource Allocation; Resuscitation; Treatment Outcome; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1996
PVS patient: disclosure after death: Re C (Adult Patient: Restriction of Publicity After Death) Medical law review, 1997,Spring, Volume: 5, Issue:1 Topics: Confidentiality; Death; Disclosure; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Personnel; Humans; Jurisprudence; Mass Media; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Physicians; Societies; United Kingdom; Withholding Treatment	1997
Basic issues in the debate over dying. Origins, 1998, Mar-19, Volume: 27, Issue:39 Topics: Catholicism; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; United States; Value of Life	1998
The real ethic of death and dying. Michigan law review, 1996, Volume: 94, Issue:6 Topics: Advance Directives; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Intention; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Motivation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Physicians; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1996
Choosing for others as continuing a life story: the problem of personal identity revisited. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1999,Spring, Volume: 27, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directive Adherence; Advance Directives; Death; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Family; Freedom; Friends; Humans; Individuality; Interpersonal Relations; Mental Competency; Narration; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Social Responsibility; Social Welfare; Terminal Care; Third-Party Consent; Time Factors	1999
Commentary: narrative views of personal identity and substituted judgment in surrogate decision making. The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 1999,Spring, Volume: 27, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directive Adherence; Advance Directives; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Friends; Humans; Individuality; Interpersonal Relations; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Narration; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Physicians; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Terminal Care; Third-Party Consent; Time Factors; Withholding Treatment	1999
Leaving the door ajar: the Supreme Court and assisted suicide. University of Richmond law review. University of Richmond, 1998, Volume: 32, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Government Regulation; History; History, 19th Century; History, 20th Century; Humans; International Cooperation; Internationality; Jurisprudence; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wedge Argument	1998
Advance directives and the personal identity problem. Philosophy & public affairs, 1988,Fall, Volume: 17, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directive Adherence; Advance Directives; Age Factors; Altruism; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Individuality; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Psychology; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Self Concept; Social Responsibility; Third-Party Consent; Time Factors; Treatment Refusal	1988
The law and practice of euthanasia in the Netherlands. The Law quarterly review, 1992, Volume: 108 Topics: Advisory Committees; Coercion; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Criminal Law; Data Collection; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Family; Freedom; Guideline Adherence; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Netherlands; Organizational Policy; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Punishment; Referral and Consultation; Right to Die; Societies; Statistics as Topic; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Supreme Court Decisions; Wedge Argument	1992
Treatment limitation decisions under uncertainty: the value of subsequent euthanasia. Bioethics, 1994, Volume: 8, Issue:1 Topics: Computers; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Decision Support Techniques; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Policy Making; Probability; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Reference Standards; Resuscitation; Right to Die; Risk; Social Values; Statistics as Topic; Stress, Psychological; Treatment Outcome; Uncertainty; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment; Wounds and Injuries; Wrongful Life	1994
The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia. Melbourne University law review, 1996, Volume: 20, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude; Australia; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Death; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Netherlands; Northern Territory; Palliative Care; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Politics; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Right to Die; Social Change; Societies; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1996
The limitations of legislation. Maryland law review (Baltimore, Md. : 1936), 1994, Volume: 53 Topics: Advance Directive Adherence; Advance Directives; Attitude; Civil Rights; Communication; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Fees and Charges; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Living Wills; Medical Futility; Patient Education as Topic; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Professional Autonomy; Resuscitation Orders; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Socioeconomic Factors; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; United States; Withholding Treatment	1994
Patients' rights and doctors' responsibilities: confluence and conflict. Medical law international, 1998, Volume: 3, Issue:2-3 Topics: Advance Directive Adherence; Advance Directives; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; Withholding Treatment	1998
The sanctity of human life: Life's Dominion: An Argument About Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom, by Ronald Dworkin. The Yale law journal, 1994, Volume: 103, Issue:7 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Altruism; Beginning of Human Life; Beneficence; Dementia; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Government Regulation; Human Rights; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Life; Mental Competency; Morals; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Public Policy; Religion; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; United States; Value of Life	1994
Medicine and human rights: emerging substantive standards and procedural protections for medical decision making within the American family. Family law quarterly, 1983,Spring, Volume: 17, Issue:1 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Amygdalin; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Civil Rights; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Mental Competency; Minors; Parental Consent; Paternalism; Patient Advocacy; Patient Care; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Right to Die; Spouses; Sterilization, Reproductive; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United States	1983
A patient's last rights: termination of medical care--an analysis of New York's In re Storar. Albany law review, 1982,Summer, Volume: 46, Issue:4 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Mental Competency; New York; Parental Consent; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1982
In re Storar: the right to die and incompetent patients. University of Pittsburgh law review. University of Pittsburgh. School of Law, 1982,Summer, Volume: 43, Issue:4 Topics: Blood Transfusion; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Massachusetts; Mental Competency; New Jersey; New York; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Privacy; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment	1982
Therefore choose death? Commentary (New York, N.Y.), 1986, Volume: 81, Issue:4 Topics: Adult; Attitude; Biomedical Technology; Chronic Disease; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Privacy; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1986
Refusal of life-sustaining treatment for terminally ill incompetent patients: court orders and an alternative. Columbia journal of law and social problems, 1985, Volume: 19, Issue:1 Topics: Chronic Disease; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1985
Two-step fantastic: the continuing case of Brother Fox. Theological studies, 1981, Volume: 42, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Massachusetts; Mental Competency; New York; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1981
Balancing the right to die with competing interests: a socio-legal enigma. Pepperdine law review, 1985, Volume: 13, Issue:1 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Age Factors; Civil Rights; Criminal Law; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Liability, Legal; Mental Competency; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life	1985
Quality of life judgments and medical indications. Quality of life and cardiovascular care, 1986,Spring, Volume: 2, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Age Factors; Altruism; Beneficence; Biomedical Technology; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Paternalism; Patient Participation; Patient Selection; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Stress, Psychological; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1986
Whose right is it anyway? Individualism, community, and the right to die: a commentary on the New Jersey experience. The Hastings law journal, 1988, Volume: 40, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Chronic Disease; Civil Rights; Community Participation; Cultural Diversity; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Hospitals; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; New Jersey; Nursing Homes; Nutritional Support; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Socioeconomic Factors; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Vulnerable Populations; Withholding Treatment	1988
Someone make up my mind: the troubling right to die issues presented by incompetent patients with no prior expression of a treatment preference. The Notre Dame law review, 1989, Volume: 64, Issue:3 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Values; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1989
Sanctity of life, quality of life, and social justice. Theological studies, 1987, Volume: 48 Topics: Adult; Catholicism; Christianity; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Critical Illness; Delivery of Health Care; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethical Theory; Ethicists; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intensive Care Units; Interpersonal Relations; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Philosophy; Protestantism; Quality of Life; Religion; Resource Allocation; Resuscitation Orders; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Desirability; Social Justice; Terminally Ill; Theology; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1987
Falling off the vine: legal fictions and the doctrine of substituted judgment. The Yale law journal, 1990, Volume: 100, Issue:1 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; History; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Mentally Ill Persons; Ownership; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Privacy; Psychotropic Drugs; Sterilization, Reproductive; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; United States	1990
Nutritional discontinuation: active or passive euthanasia? Journal of neurosurgical nursing, 1990, Volume: 22, Issue:2 Topics: Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Double Effect Principle; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Hospitals; Humans; Intention; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prognosis; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1990
Terminating treatment in Hungary Allocating death. Bulletin of medical ethics, 1991, Volume: No. 72 Topics: Advance Directives; Delivery of Health Care; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Homicide; Humans; Hungary; Informed Consent; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Social Justice; Terminally Ill; Terminology as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment	1991
The due process of dying. California law review, 1991, Volume: 79, Issue:4 Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Food; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Intensive Care Units; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Moral Obligations; Paternalism; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Suicide; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
Setting euthanasia on the level. The Liverpool law review, 1993, Volume: 15, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Advisory Committees; Community Participation; Decision Making; Double Effect Principle; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Intention; Interdisciplinary Communication; Interprofessional Relations; Jurisprudence; Lawyers; Legislation as Topic; Mental Competency; Motivation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Psychiatry; Public Policy; Referral and Consultation; Social Work; Stress, Psychological; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; United Kingdom; Value of Life; Wedge Argument	1993
Termination of medical treatment: the setting of moral limits from infancy to old age. Religious studies review, 1990, Volume: 16, Issue:4 Topics: Aged; Altruism; Anencephaly; Beneficence; Burns; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Critical Illness; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Financial Support; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Mental Competency; Pain; Patient Selection; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1990
People with pipes: a question of euthanasia. University of Puget Sound law review. University of Puget Sound. School of Law, 1993,Winter, Volume: 16, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Civil Rights; Coercion; Dementia; Disabled Persons; Economics; Enteral Nutrition; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Informed Consent; Intention; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Mental Competency; Mentally Ill Persons; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; Privacy; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Desirability; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1993
The killing words? How the new quality-of-life ethic affects people with severe disabilities. SMU law review : a publication of Southern Methodist University School of Law, 1992,Winter, Volume: 46, Issue:3 Topics: Abortion, Eugenic; Adult; Attitude; Child; Coercion; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Diagnosis; Disabled Persons; Ethicists; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; General Surgery; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Individuality; Infant, Newborn; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Parents; Patient Selection; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Prejudice; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Suicide; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment; Wrongful Life	1992
Moral perspectives on euthanasia. Studies in Christian ethics, 1991, Volume: 4, Issue:1 Topics: Biomedical Technology; Catholicism; Christianity; Cultural Diversity; Double Effect Principle; Empathy; Ethical Analysis; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Human Rights; Humans; Intention; Life Support Care; Morals; Motivation; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physician-Patient Relations; Physician's Role; Religion; Social Change; Social Values; Socioeconomic Factors; Stress, Psychological; Terminally Ill; Terminology as Topic; Theology; Trust; Value of Life; Virtues; Vulnerable Populations; Withholding Treatment	1991
HIV disease: criminal and civil liability for assisted suicide. Golden Gate University law review. Golden Gate University. School of Law, 1991,Spring, Volume: 21, Issue:1 Topics: Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome; Attitude; California; Civil Rights; Criminal Law; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; History; HIV Seropositivity; Homicide; Humans; Intention; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Malpractice; Motivation; Pain; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Public Opinion; Right to Die; Stress, Psychological; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1991
Recent developments in the Netherlands concerning euthanasia and other medical behavior that shortens life. Medical law international, 1995, Volume: 1, Issue:4 Topics: Advance Directives; Advisory Committees; Attitude; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Decision Making; Dementia; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; History, 20th Century; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Intention; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Mentally Ill Persons; Motivation; Netherlands; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Parental Consent; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Prognosis; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Stress, Psychological; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1995
The doctor's dilemma: necessity and the legality of medical intervention. Medical law international, 1995, Volume: 1, Issue:4 Topics: Abortion, Therapeutic; Cesarean Section; Civil Rights; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Criminal Law; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; General Surgery; Homicide; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Intention; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Pain; Patient Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Social Responsibility; Sterilization, Reproductive; Terminal Care; United Kingdom; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1995
What shall we do with Norman? An experiment in communal discernment. Christian bioethics, 1996, Volume: 2, Issue:1 Topics: Aged; Attitude to Death; Christianity; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Friends; Humans; Intention; Interpersonal Relations; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Protestantism; Quality of Life; Religion; Social Responsibility; Terminally Ill; Theology; Third-Party Consent; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1996
Postmodern medicine: deconstructing the Hippocratic Oath. Forum for applied research and public policy, 1993, Volume: 65, Issue:1 Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Codes of Ethics; Communication; Death; Decision Making; Empathy; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Ethics, Professional; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Feminism; Fetus; Freedom; Hippocratic Oath; History; Humans; Individuality; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Medicine; Metaphor; Narration; Paternalism; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Physician-Patient Relations; Postmodernism; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Social Change; Social Dominance; Social Values; Sociology, Medical; Treatment Refusal	1993
The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents. UCLA law review. University of California, Los Angeles. School of Law, 1981, Volume: 29, Issue:2 Topics: Brain Death; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Dementia; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Reference Standards; Resuscitation; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1981
Missing persons: legal perceptions of incompetent patients. Rutgers law review, 1994,Winter, Volume: 46, Issue:2 Topics: Advance Directives; Aged; Decision Making; Dementia; Empathy; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Mentally Ill Persons; Models, Theoretical; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Risk; Risk Assessment; Self Concept; Stress, Psychological; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment	1994
Decisions and responsibilities at the end of life: euthanasia and clinically assisted death. Medical law international, 1996, Volume: 2, Issue:3 Topics: Advisory Committees; Analgesics, Opioid; Decision Making; Double Effect Principle; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Intention; Ireland; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Motivation; Nutritional Support; Pain; Palliative Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Suicide, Assisted; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; Withholding Treatment	1996
Quinlan, privacy, and the handling of incompetent dying patients. Rutgers law review, 1977,Winter, Volume: 30, Issue:2 Topics: Decision Making; Ethics; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment	1977
Review of two books on death and dying. De Paul law review, 1977,Summer, Volume: 26, Issue:4 Topics: Biomedical Technology; Civil Rights; Death; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Treatment Refusal	1977
Brother Fox, the courts and death with dignity. America, 1980, Nov-08, Volume: 143, Issue:14 Topics: Catholicism; Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Terminally Ill	1980
Malette v. Shulman. Dominion law reports, 1990, Mar-30, Volume: 67 Topics: Advance Directives; Blood Transfusion; Canada; Christianity; Civil Rights; Critical Illness; Emergency Medical Services; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Informed Consent; Jehovah's Witnesses; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Ontario; Patient Advocacy; Patient Rights; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Religion; Treatment Refusal	1990
In re Guardianship of L.W. West's north western reporter, 1992, Apr-01, Volume: 482 Topics: Aged; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Institutionalization; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Mental Competency; Mentally Ill Persons; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Risk; Risk Assessment; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Wisconsin; Withholding Treatment	1992
Brophy v. New England Sinai Hospital, Inc. North eastern reporter. Second series, 1986, Sep-11, Volume: 497 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Massachusetts; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1986
Matter of Storar; Eichner v. Dillon. North eastern reporter. Second series, 1981, Mar-31, Volume: 420 Topics: Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment	1981
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health. West's Supreme Court reporter, 1990, Jun-25, Volume: 110 Topics: Advance Directives; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Missouri; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Control, Formal; State Government; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1990
Legalistic and contextual approaches to living wills. Newsletter on philosophy and medicine, 1992,Fall, Volume: 91, Issue:2 Topics: Communication; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Goals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Living Wills; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United States	1992
Religious traditions and public policy. Assia--Jewish medical ethics, 1988, Volume: 1, Issue:1 Topics: Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Cultural Diversity; Death; Democracy; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Resource Allocation; Social Values; Theology; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment	1988