Page last updated: 2024-08-23

freedom and Brain Dead

freedom has been researched along with Brain Dead in 40 studies

Research

Studies (40)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-199018 (45.00)18.7374
1990's21 (52.50)18.2507
2000's1 (2.50)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Lederberg, MS1
de Deyn, PP; Martin, JJ1
Hardwig, J1
Gillett, G1
Childress, JF1
Ackerman, F; Cohen, C; Meisel, A; Silverman, H1
Trainor, R1
Grant, ER; Koop, CE1
Lehman, LB1
Humber, JM1
Solnick, PB1
Veatch, RM1
Coughlin, MD; Freedman, B1
McCarthy, JJ1
Nelson, HL1
Mulholland, KA1
Callahan, D1
Ifrah, AJ1
Blake, DC; Maldonado, L; Meinhardt, RA1
Robertson, JA1
Cate, FH1
Schostak, Z1
Goldberg, CK1
Andrews, L; Hitt, J; Kevorkian, J; Kimbrell, A; May, WF1
Patterson, EG1
Shiner, K1
Bleich, JD; Caplan, AL; Lafferty, KJ; Murray, JE; Robertson, JA1
Magnusson, R1
Hasui, C; Hayashi, M; Katoh, H; Kitamura, F; Kitamura, T; Murakami, M; Takeuchi, M1
Becker, C; Macer, D; Morioka, M1
Rich, BA1
Buchanan, AE1
Macer, D1
Weigel, CJ1
Rosner, F1
Mitchell, PR1
Maguire, DC1
Falck, DP1
Gerzog, WC1
Bleich, JD1

Reviews

2 review(s) available for freedom and Brain Dead

ArticleYear
The gift of life: ethical problems and policies in obtaining and distributing organs for transplantation.
    Primary care, 1986, Volume: 13, Issue:2

    Topics: Altruism; Animals; Beneficence; Brain Death; Cadaver; Child; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Family; Fees and Charges; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Health Personnel; Hospitals; Human Body; Humans; Information Dissemination; Information Services; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Motivation; Organ Transplantation; Organizational Policy; Ownership; Patient Selection; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Presumed Consent; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Statistics as Topic; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Transplantation; Transplantation, Heterologous; United States; Voluntary Programs

1986
Choosing life after death: respecting religious beliefs and moral convictions in near death decisions.
    Syracuse law review, 1988, Volume: 39, Issue:4

    Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude to Death; Autopsy; Blood Transfusion; Brain Death; Christianity; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Economics; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Indians, North American; Jehovah's Witnesses; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Morals; New Jersey; New York; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Public Policy; Religion; Social Values; State Government; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment

1988

Other Studies

38 other study(ies) available for freedom and Brain Dead

ArticleYear
The psychological repercussions of New York State's do-not-resuscitate law. An American experience with mandated "truth-telling".
    Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1997, Feb-20, Volume: 809

    Topics: Bioethics; Brain Death; Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation; Communication; Community-Institutional Relations; Ethics, Medical; Expert Testimony; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Legislation, Hospital; Living Wills; Medical Futility; New York; Palliative Care; Patient Advocacy; Personnel, Hospital; Physician-Patient Relations; Resuscitation; Resuscitation Orders; Terminal Care; Truth Disclosure; United States

1997
[The loss of autonomy in disabling neurologic diseases. Ethical considerations].
    Revue medicale de Liege, 1997, Volume: 52, Issue:6

    Topics: Brain Death; Cognition; Communication; Dementia; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Muscular Dystrophies; Nervous System Diseases; Patient Advocacy; Persistent Vegetative State; Quadriplegia

1997
Treating the brain dead for the benefit of the family.
    The Journal of clinical ethics, 1991,Spring, Volume: 2, Issue:1

    Topics: Altruism; Attitude to Death; Beneficence; Brain Death; Death; Deception; Diagnosis; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Family; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Paternalism; Patient Care; Patients; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Risk; Risk Assessment; Stress, Psychological; Third-Party Consent; Truth Disclosure; Withholding Treatment

1991
Reply to J M Stanley: fiddling and clarity.
    Journal of medical ethics, 1987, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Death; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Cadaver; Death; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Life Support Care; Moral Obligations; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Self Concept; Social Responsibility

1987
Will society defend our right to live?
    The New York times on the Web, 1991, Jan-31

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Hospitals; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Minnesota; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment

1991
Should the newly dead be used to help the living? An issue in our time.
    The Linacre quarterly, 1989, Volume: 56, Issue:3

    Topics: Attitude to Death; Brain Death; Brain Diseases; Brain Injuries; Cadaver; Death; Dehumanization; Education, Medical; Freedom; Human Body; Human Experimentation; Humans; Informed Consent; Moral Obligations; Personal Autonomy; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Social Values; Social Welfare; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors

1989
The "small beginnings" of euthanasia: examining the erosion in legal prohibitions against mercy-killing.
    Notre Dame journal of law, ethics & public policy, 1986,Spring, Volume: 2, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Brain Death; Chronic Disease; Death; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Mental Competency; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Policy Making; Politics; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Right to Die; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment

1986
Of dead brains, living wills, and autonomy.
    Hospital practice, 1991, Jan-15, Volume: 26, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Living Wills; Personal Autonomy; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment

1991
Statutory criteria for determining human death.
    Mercer law review, 1991,Spring, Volume: 42, Issue:3

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Heart; Humans; Individuality; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Policy Making; Public Policy; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Social Change; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument

1991
Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I.
    Medicine and law, 1984, Volume: 3, Issue:4

    Topics: Brain Death; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Privacy; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Withholding Treatment

1984
Defining death at the beginning of life.
    Second opinion (Park Ridge, Ill.), 1989, Issue:10

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Beginning of Human Life; Brain; Brain Death; Death; Embryo, Mammalian; Embryonic and Fetal Development; Ethics; Fetus; Freedom; Homicide; Human Rights; Humans; Individuality; Life; Moral Obligations; Morals; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Public Policy; Social Responsibility; United States

1989
Born again: the ethics of the first body transplants.
    Speculations in science and technology, 1989, Volume: 12, Issue:2

    Topics: Animal Experimentation; Animal Welfare; Animals; Biomedical Research; Brain; Brain Death; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Ethics; Financial Support; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Human Body; Human Experimentation; Humans; Individuality; Informed Consent; Life Expectancy; Motivation; Organ Transplantation; Personhood; Philosophy; Presumed Consent; Psychology; Research; Research Personnel; Research Subjects; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Science; Self Concept; Social Control, Formal; Social Values; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Transplantation

1989
Caring for the critically ill patient in a persistent vegetative state: must nutritional and hydration support always be provided?
    The Linacre quarterly, 1994, Volume: 61, Issue:2

    Topics: Brain Death; Casuistry; Catholicism; Critical Illness; Death; Decision Making; Dehumanization; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Individuality; Intention; Interpersonal Relations; Motivation; Narration; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Quality of Life; Risk; Risk Assessment; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment

1994
The architect and the bee: some reflections on postmortem pregnancy.
    Bioethics, 1994, Volume: 8, Issue:3

    Topics: Altruism; Beneficence; Biomedical Technology; Brain Death; Cadaver; Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities; Death; Embryonic and Fetal Development; Ethics; Female; Fetus; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Infant, Premature; Jurisprudence; Labor, Obstetric; Life Support Care; Maternal-Fetal Relations; Moral Obligations; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Resource Allocation; Risk; Risk Assessment; Social Responsibility; Women's Rights

1994
A time to be born and a time to die: a pregnant woman's right to die with dignity.
    Indiana law review, 1987,Fall, Volume: 20, Issue:4

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Conflict of Interest; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetal Viability; Fetus; Freedom; Humans; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Privacy; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment

1987
Vital distinctions, mortal questions: debating euthanasia and health care costs.
    Commonweal (New York, N.Y.), 1988, Jul-15, Volume: 115, Issue:13

    Topics: Biomedical Technology; Brain Death; Chronic Disease; Decision Making; Delivery of Health Care; Ethics; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Financial Support; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Homicide; Humans; Life Support Care; Nutritional Support; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Justice; Social Responsibility; Suicide; Suicide, Assisted; United States; Wedge Argument; Withholding Treatment

1988
The living will.
    Journal of halacha and contemporary society, 1992,Fall, Volume: No. 24

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Conscience; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Facilities; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Living Wills; New Jersey; New York; Nutritional Support; Organizational Policy; Patient Transfer; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; Right to Die; State Government; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Withholding Treatment

1992
Bioethics and the law: the case of Helga Wanglie: a clash at the bedside -- medically futile treatment v. patient autonomy.
    Whittier law review, 1993, Volume: 14

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Casuistry; Consensus; Death; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Economics; Ethical Analysis; Ethical Theory; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Goals; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Jurisprudence; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Patients; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Prejudice; Probability; Prognosis; Quality of Life; Resource Allocation; Right to Die; Social Values; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; Uncertainty; United States; Ventilators, Mechanical; Withholding Treatment

1993
Posthumous reproduction.
    Indiana law journal (Indianapolis, Ind. : 1926), 1994,Fall, Volume: 69, Issue:4

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Brain Death; Cadaver; Cesarean Section; Civil Rights; Cryopreservation; Death; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Embryo Transfer; Embryo, Mammalian; Fathers; Fertilization in Vitro; Fetus; Freedom; Government Regulation; Group Processes; Humans; Insemination, Artificial; Jurisprudence; Labor, Obstetric; Life Support Care; Ownership; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Politics; Posthumous Conception; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Public Policy; Reproduction; Reproductive Techniques, Assisted; Single Person; Social Control, Formal; Spermatozoa; Spouses; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Tissue Banks; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment

1994
Posthumous autonomy revisited.
    Indiana law journal (Indianapolis, Ind. : 1926), 1994,Fall, Volume: 69, Issue:4

    Topics: Advance Directives; Brain Death; Cadaver; Cryopreservation; Death; Embryo, Mammalian; Freedom; Government Regulation; Humans; Jurisprudence; Labor, Obstetric; Ownership; Personal Autonomy; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Presumed Consent; Reproduction; Social Control, Formal; Social Justice; Social Welfare; Spermatozoa; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors

1994
Is there patient autonomy in Halacha?
    Assia--Jewish medical ethics, 1995, Volume: 2, Issue:2

    Topics: Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Cadaver; Death; Decision Making; Diagnosis; Disclosure; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Judaism; Living Wills; Patients; Personal Autonomy; Prognosis; Research; Stress, Psychological; Therapeutic Human Experimentation; Third-Party Consent; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Treatment Refusal; Truth Disclosure; Value of Life

1995
Sacred or for sale? The human body in the age of biotechnology.
    Harper's, 1990, Volume: 281, Issue:1685

    Topics: Altruism; Biomedical Technology; Brain Death; Capitalism; Civil Rights; Coercion; Death; Economics; Ethics; Fees and Charges; Freedom; Gift Giving; Human Body; Humans; Industry; Jurisprudence; Morals; Ownership; Patents as Topic; Personal Autonomy; Political Systems; Poverty; Public Policy; Social Change; Social Justice; Social Values; Social Welfare; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; United States; Value of Life; Wedge Argument

1990
Human rights and human life: an uneven fit.
    Tulane law review, 1994, Volume: 68, Issue:6

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Adolescent; Adult; Anencephaly; Beginning of Human Life; Brain Death; Cadaver; Civil Rights; Death; Euthanasia, Passive; Fetus; Freedom; Human Rights; Humans; Individuality; Infant, Newborn; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Life; Mental Competency; Minors; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Quality of Life; Supreme Court Decisions; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment

1994
Medical futility: a futile concept?
    Washington and Lee law review, 1996, Volume: 53, Issue:2

    Topics: Anencephaly; Brain Death; Consensus; Decision Making; Dissent and Disputes; Ethics, Medical; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Group Processes; Health Care Rationing; Hospitals; Human Rights; Humans; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Mental Competency; Patient Transfer; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physician's Role; Physicians; Politics; Refusal to Treat; Resource Allocation; Resuscitation; Treatment Outcome; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment

1996
Defining the limits of organ and tissue research and transplantation.
    Suffolk University law review, 1993,Winter, Volume: 27, Issue:4

    Topics: Aborted Fetus; Brain Death; Cadaver; Death; Fees and Charges; Fetal Tissue Transplantation; Fetus; Freedom; Human Body; Humans; Personal Autonomy; Presumed Consent; Public Policy; Social Values; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors

1993
The future of the euthanasia debate in Australia.
    Melbourne University law review, 1996, Volume: 20, Issue:4

    Topics: Advance Directives; Attitude; Australia; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Death; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Life Support Care; Medical Futility; Netherlands; Northern Territory; Palliative Care; Paternalism; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Politics; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Right to Die; Social Change; Societies; Suicide, Assisted; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal; United Kingdom; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment

1996
Respecting autonomy in difficult medical settings: a questionnaire study in Japan.
    Ethics & behavior, 2000, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Attitude; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Commitment of Mentally Ill; Data Collection; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Japan; Parents; Paternalism; Patient Advocacy; Patient Participation; Personal Autonomy; Students; Suicide; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Universities

2000
What can Japan offer to bioethics? A response to Dr. Macer.
    Nichibunken newsletter = Nihon Bunka, 1994, Volume: No. 18

    Topics: Attitude; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Cultural Diversity; Decision Making; Democracy; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; International Cooperation; Internationality; Japan; Paternalism; Patient Participation; Personal Autonomy; Philosophy; Public Opinion; Religion; Secularism; Social Values; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors

1994
Postmodern medicine: deconstructing the Hippocratic Oath.
    Forum for applied research and public policy, 1993, Volume: 65, Issue:1

    Topics: Abortion, Induced; Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Codes of Ethics; Communication; Death; Decision Making; Empathy; Ethical Analysis; Ethics; Ethics, Medical; Ethics, Professional; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Passive; Feminism; Fetus; Freedom; Hippocratic Oath; History; Humans; Individuality; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Medicine; Metaphor; Narration; Paternalism; Patient Participation; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Philosophy; Physician-Patient Relations; Postmodernism; Pregnancy; Pregnant Women; Reference Standards; Self Concept; Social Change; Social Dominance; Social Values; Sociology, Medical; Treatment Refusal

1993
The limits of proxy decisionmaking for incompetents.
    UCLA law review. University of California, Los Angeles. School of Law, 1981, Volume: 29, Issue:2

    Topics: Brain Death; Civil Rights; Death; Decision Making; Dementia; Euthanasia, Passive; Family; Freedom; Humans; Individuality; Judicial Role; Jurisprudence; Mental Competency; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Personhood; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Physicians; Reference Standards; Resuscitation; Right to Die; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Treatment Refusal; United States; Withholding Treatment

1981
What can bioethics offer to Japanese culture?
    Nichibunken newsletter = Nihon Bunka, 1993, Volume: No. 15

    Topics: Attitude; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Cultural Diversity; Decision Making; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; International Cooperation; Internationality; Japan; Paternalism; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Public Opinion; Public Policy; Religion; Social Values; Tissue and Organ Procurement; Tissue Donors; Trust; Western World

1993
The dying patient's rights--do they exist?
    South Texas law journal, 1975, Volume: 16, Issue:2

    Topics: Blood Transfusion; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jurisprudence; Living Wills; Organ Transplantation; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Religion; Right to Die; Suicide; Terminally Ill; Treatment Refusal

1975
The use and abuse of heroic measures to prolong dying.
    Journal of religion and health, 1978, Volume: 17, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Death; Catholicism; Death; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Life Support Care; Patients; Personal Autonomy; Physician's Role; Terminally Ill; Value of Life

1978
North Carolina's Natural Death Act: confronting death with dignity.
    Wake Forest law review, 1978, Volume: 14, Issue:4

    Topics: Brain Death; Civil Rights; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Informed Consent; Jurisprudence; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Living Wills; North Carolina; Patients; Personal Autonomy; Physician-Patient Relations; Physicians; State Government; Terminally Ill; Withholding Treatment

1978
Death by chance, death by choice.
    Atlantic monthly (Boston, Mass. : 1971), 1974, Volume: 233, Issue:1

    Topics: Attitude to Death; Brain Death; Death; Decision Making; Disabled Persons; Euthanasia; Euthanasia, Active; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Life Support Care; Living Wills; Organ Transplantation; Personal Autonomy; Persons with Mental Disabilities; Quality of Life; Terminally Ill; Withholding Treatment

1974
In re Quinlan: one court's answer to the problem of death with dignity.
    Washington and Lee law review, 1977,Winter, Volume: 34, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Death; Catholicism; Christianity; Civil Rights; Decision Making; Ethics Committees; Ethics Committees, Clinical; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Humans; Jehovah's Witnesses; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Moral Obligations; Motivation; Personal Autonomy; Physician's Role; Privacy; Quality of Life; Reference Standards; Right to Die; Social Responsibility; Treatment Refusal; Value of Life

1977
A hypothetical: Quinlan under Ohio law.
    Akron law review, 1976,Summer, Volume: 10, Issue:1

    Topics: Brain Death; Death; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Homicide; Humans; Jurisprudence; Legal Guardians; Legislation as Topic; Liability, Legal; Life Support Care; Mental Competency; Ohio; Parental Consent; Personal Autonomy; Physicians; Privacy; State Government; Terminal Care; Terminally Ill; Third-Party Consent; Withholding Treatment

1976
Religious traditions and public policy.
    Assia--Jewish medical ethics, 1988, Volume: 1, Issue:1

    Topics: Advance Directives; Bioethical Issues; Bioethics; Brain Death; Civil Rights; Cultural Diversity; Death; Democracy; Ethics; Euthanasia, Passive; Freedom; Health Care Rationing; Humans; Judaism; Jurisprudence; Persistent Vegetative State; Personal Autonomy; Privacy; Public Policy; Quality of Life; Religion; Resource Allocation; Social Values; Theology; Treatment Refusal; United States; Value of Life; Withholding Treatment

1988