fr-264205 and Urinary-Tract-Infections

To evaluate efficacy and adverse events of ceftolozane/tazobactam in complicated UTI including acute pyelonephritis.. Databases that include PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and TRIP were searched. All randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were considered for the study. Statistical analysis was done using a fixed effects model, and results were expressed in proportion for dichotomous data and risk ratio for continuous data with 95% confidence intervals (CI).. A clinical cure of ceftolozane/tazobactam was found to be 92% with 95% CI of 90-94 while that of piperacillin/tazobactam was only 78% (95% CI, 74-82) in patients with complicated UTI. Microbiological eradication was still higher in the ceftolozane/tazobactam group (83%, 95% CI 81-88) when compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (63% 95% CI, 58.77-65.2). Ceftolozane/tazobactam was more effective in the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections other than acute pyelonephritis as compared to piperacillin/tazobactam (RR = 1.21, 95% CI, 1.07-1.23). Serious adverse events were found comparable in both groups (RR = 1.15, 95% CI, 0.64-2.09).. The analysis showed that ceftolozane/tazobactam has better clinical outcomes including cure rates and low resistance for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infection.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Humans; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Pyelonephritis; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) in adult patients through meta-analysis.. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane databases were searched up to June 2019. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that evaluated ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparators for treating cIAIs and cUTIs in adult patients were included. Primary outcome was clinical cure rate; secondary outcomes were clinical failure rate, microbiological eradication rate, and risk of an adverse event (AE).. Three RCTs were included. Overall, ceftolozane-tazobactam had a clinical cure rate similar to comparators in the microbiological intent-to-treat (mITT) population (odds ratio [OR], 0.87; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43-1.79; I. The clinical efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam is as high as that of comparators in the treatment of cIAIs and cUTIs in adult patients, and this antibiotic is well tolerated.

Topics: Cephalosporins; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

Globally, the increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant pathogens continues to pose major problems in healthcare systems and, at least in part, is driving an initiative to develop new antibacterials, such as ceftolozane (a cephalosporin β-lactam). Adding a β-lactamase inhibitor (e.g. tazobactam) to a β-lactam extends its spectrum of activity against β-lactamase-producing microorganisms (a key mechanism of resistance to β-lactams). Ceftolozane/tazobactam (Zerbaxa™), a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is indicated for the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) or complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI), including pyelonephritis. In multinational, phase 3 noninferiority trials, intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam was an effective and generally well tolerated treatment in patients with cIAI or cUTI. In the ASPECT-cIAI trial, ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole was noninferior to meropenem in terms of clinical cure rates at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit, with clinical cure rates in subgroup analyses consistent with those in the primary analysis. In the ASPECT-cUTI trial, ceftolozane/tazobactam was superior to levofloxacin in terms of composite cure rates (clinical cure plus microbiological eradiation) at the TOC visit. Further clinical experience should help to more definitively position ceftolozane/tazobactam in the treatment of cIAI and cUTI, including in patients with renal impairment. In the meantime, given its very good in vitro activity against extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae and drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, ceftolozane/tazobactam provides a potential alternative to currently approved antibacterials for empirical treatment of cIAI and cUTI in adults.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Penicillanic Acid; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, is approved for treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). Safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, were assessed.. This phase 2 study (NCT03230838) compared ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treatment of cUTI in participants from birth to <18 years of age. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included clinical cure and per-participant microbiologic response rates at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits.. The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population included 95 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam, n = 71; meropenem, n = 24). The most common diagnosis and pathogen were pyelonephritis (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 84.5%; meropenem, 79.2%) and Escherichia coli (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 74.6%; meropenem, 87.5%); 5.7% (ceftolozane/tazobactam) and 4.8% (meropenem) of E. coli isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producers. Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment groups (any: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 59.0% vs. meropenem, 60.6%; drug-related: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 14.0% vs. meropenem, 15.2%; serious: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 3.0% vs. meropenem, 6.1%). Rates of clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 94.4% and 100% and at TOC were 88.7% and 95.8%, respectively. Rates of microbiologic eradication for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 93.0% and 95.8%, and at TOC were 84.5% and 87.5%, respectively.. Ceftolozane/tazobactam had a favorable safety profile in pediatric participants with cUTI; rates of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication were high and similar to meropenem. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a safe and effective new treatment option for children with cUTI, especially due to antibacterial-resistant Gram-negative pathogens.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Child; Escherichia coli; Humans; Infant, Newborn; Meropenem; Penicillanic Acid; Pyelonephritis; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

Diabetes mellitus and hyperglycemia are associated with increased susceptibility to bacterial infections and poor treatment outcomes. This post hoc evaluation of the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) and complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) aimed to evaluate baseline characteristics, efficacy, and safety in patients with and without diabetes treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam and comparators. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antibacterial with potent activity against Gram-negative pathogens and is approved for the treatment of cIAI (with metronidazole) and cUTI (including pyelonephritis).. Patients from the phase 3 ASPECT studies with (n = 245) and without (n = 1802) diabetes were compared to evaluate the baseline characteristics, efficacy, and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam and active comparators.. Significantly more patients with than without diabetes were 65 years of age or older; patients with diabetes were also more likely to weigh ≥75 kg at baseline (57.1% vs 44.5%), to have renal impairment (48.5% vs 30.2%), or to have APACHE II scores ≥10 (33.8% vs 17.0%). More patients with diabetes had comorbidities and an increased incidence of complicating factors in both cIAI and cUTI. Clinical cIAI and composite cure cUTI rates across study treatments were lower in patients with than without diabetes (cIAI, 75.4% vs 86.1%, P = 0.0196; cUTI, 62.4% vs 74.7%, P = 0.1299) but were generally similar between the ceftolozane/tazobactam and active comparator treatment groups. However, significantly higher composite cure rates were reported with ceftolozane/tazobactam than with levofloxacin in patients without diabetes with cUTI (79.5% vs 69.9%; P = 0.0048). Significantly higher rates of adverse events observed in patients with diabetes were likely due to comorbidities because treatment-related adverse events were similar between groups.. In this post hoc analysis, patients with diabetes in general were older, heavier, and had a greater number of complicating comorbidities. Patients with diabetes had lower cure rates and a significantly higher frequency of adverse events than patients without diabetes, likely because of the higher rates of medical complications in this subgroup. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was shown to be at least as effective as comparators in treating cUTI and cIAI in this population.. cIAI, NCT01445665 and NCT01445678 (both trials registered prospectively on September 26, 2011); cUTI, NCT01345929 and NCT01345955 (both trials registered prospectively on April 28, 2011).

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacterial Infections; Cephalosporins; Diabetes Complications; Diabetes Mellitus; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Levofloxacin; Male; Metronidazole; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Pyelonephritis; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

For reasons not well understood, antibacterials can yield lower cure rates in renally impaired patients. We explored this subject for the novel antibacterial ceftolozane/tazobactam.. ASPECT-complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAIs) and ASPECT-complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) were randomized, double-blinded clinical trials. Analyses in moderate [creatinine clearance (CL CR ) 30-50 mL/min] and mild/no (CL CR  > 50 mL/min) renal impairment (RI) patients were pre-specified as exploratory endpoints in the statistical analysis plans. We also explored variables potentially impacting outcomes in these subgroups. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01445665/NCT01445678 and NCT01345929/NCT01345955.. At baseline, 4.5% (36/806) of cIAI patients and 7.3% (58/795) of cUTI patients had moderate RI. Moderate RI patients were older, had more comorbid conditions and had higher APACHE-II scores. In the cIAI microbiological intent-to-treat population, response rates were 48% and 69% in moderate RI patients receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem, respectively; among moderate RI cIAI patients considered treatment failures, indeterminate responses were more frequent with ceftolozane/tazobactam (39%; 9/23) than meropenem (8%; 1/13). In the cUTI microbiological modified intent-to-treat population, response rates were 81% and 78% in moderate RI patients receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam and levofloxacin, respectively. In both studies, response rates in moderate RI patients were similar between treatment arms in microbiologically evaluable populations, which excluded indeterminate responses due to missing data/protocol deviations (cIAI: 72.7% ceftolozane/tazobactam versus 71.4% meropenem; cUTI: 87% ceftolozane/tazobactam versus 80% levofloxacin).. Regardless of treatment, clinical cure rates in cIAI and cUTI were lower in moderate versus mild/no RI patients. In moderate RI cIAI patients, numerical differences in response rates between treatments were attributable to imbalances in the numerical patients deemed indeterminate.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Penicillanic Acid; Renal Insufficiency; Tazobactam; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections; Young Adult

This study compares the clinical and microbiological efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam (CTLZ/TAZ) and piperacillin/tazobactam (PIPC/TAZ) for treating complicated cystitis or acute pyelonephritis.. Patients who had been treated with empiric antibiotics, CTLZ/TAZ (52 cases) or PIPC/TAZ (47 cases), due to urinary tract infections (UTIs) were eligible for this study. Patients' demographic backgrounds, types of UTIs, and causative microorganisms isolated from urine or blood bacterial cultures were collected. Short-term clinical efficacy at the end of the initial empiric therapy, long-term clinical efficacy including sequential antibiotic treatments (nonrecurrence rate within 1 month after the initial empiric therapy), and microbiological efficacy were retrospectively compared in both CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ groups.. Complicated UTIs were present in most eligible patients, and no significant difference in the patients' background was observed between the two groups. Escherichia coli and Enterococcus faecalis were the most common microorganisms isolated from urine culture in both groups. The short-term clinical effective rate of CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ was 80.8% and 87.2%, respectively. For long-term clinical efficacy, the nonrecurrence rate of UTIs was present in 95.1% and 89.7% of patients with CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ, respectively. No significant difference was observed in the short- and long-term effects between the two groups. The microbiological efficacy of the CTLZ/TAZ and PIPC/TAZ groups was 72.7% and 86.0%, respectively. No significant difference in microbiological effects was also observed between the two groups.. This study demonstrated the noninferiority of CTLZ/TAZ to PIPC/TAZ, suggesting that CTLZ/TAZ is an alternative antibiotic used as empiric therapy for UTIs.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Escherichia coli; Humans; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Retrospective Studies; Urinary Tract Infections

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Humans; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

Acidic pH has been shown to impact the antibiotic activity of non-β-lactams in urine.. To investigate the in vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with meropenem at different pH settings in urine.. We determined the MICs for 30 clinical isolates of Escherichia coli, 25 clinical isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae and 24 clinical isolates of Proteus mirabilis in pooled human urine and standard growth medium at pH 5 and 7. Time-kill curves were produced for one representative clinical isolate of tested bacterial strains in urine at pH 5, 6 and 7 for both antibiotics at concentrations above and below the MIC. HPLC analysis of the stability of ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem was performed at different pH values.. The median MICs of both antibiotics were up to 8-fold higher at pH 5 than at pH 7. Bacterial growth of E. coli was not impacted by pH, while for K. pneumoniae and P. mirabilis low pH slightly reduced growth. Compared with pH 7, pH 5 resulted in a significant decrease in antibiotic activity with a delta of up to 3 log10 bacterial counts after 24 h. Impact of acidic pH was lowest for P. mirabilis; however, this strain metabolically increased the pH during experiments. Stability was not impacted by low pH.. Acidic pH had a significant negative impact on the activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in urine. Considering concentrations achieved in urine, our results confirm existing breakpoints and do not advocate increasing ceftolozane/tazobactam breakpoints for urinary tract infections.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Humans; Hydrogen-Ion Concentration; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Child; Child, Preschool; Female; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Male; Middle Aged; Tazobactam; Urinary Tract Infections; Young Adult

A challenge in the empiric treatment of complicated urinary tract infection (cUTI) is identifying the initial appropriate antibiotic therapy (IAAT), which is associated with reduced length of stay and mortality compared with initial inappropriate antibiotic therapy (IIAT). We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of ceftolozane/tazobactam compared with piperacillin/tazobactam (one of the standard of care antibiotics), for the treatment of hospitalized patients with cUTI.. A decision-analytic Monte Carlo simulation model was developed to compare the costs and effectiveness of empiric treatment with either ceftolozane/tazobactam or piperacillin/tazobactam in hospitalized adult patients with cUTI infected with Gram-negative pathogens in the US. The model applies the baseline prevalence of resistance as reported by national in-vitro surveillance data.. In a cohort of 1000 patients, treatment with ceftolozane/tazobactam resulted in higher total costs compared with piperacillin/tazobactam ($36,413 /patient vs. $36,028/patient, respectively), greater quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) (9.19/patient vs. 9.13/patient, respectively) and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $6128/QALY. Ceftolozane/tazobactam remained cost-effective at a willingness to pay of $100,000 per QALY compared to piperacillin/tazobactam over a range of input parameter values during one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis.. Model results show that ceftolozane/tazobactam is likely to be cost-effective compared with piperacillin/tazobactam for the empiric treatment of hospitalized cUTI patients in the United States.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cephalosporins; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Hospitalization; Humans; Middle Aged; Monte Carlo Method; Mortality; Penicillanic Acid; Piperacillin; Piperacillin, Tazobactam Drug Combination; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; United States; Urinary Tract Infections

High rates of morbidity and mortality have been linked to the emergence of antimicrobial-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, especially in the hospital setting. Infections due to extended-spectrum-β-lactamase producing Enterobacteriaceae (e.g., Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae) and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa pose a major health threat and dramatically reduce the therapeutic options to achieve an appropriate treatment. There is a need for novel antimicrobials that could provide clinical efficacy toward multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, including extended-spectrum-β-lactamase and carbapenemase producers. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin associated with a well-established β-lactamase inhibitor currently in clinical development for the treatment of complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections and nosocomial pneumonia. Phase II and III trials have shown high efficacy and good tolerability in complicated urinary and intra-abdominal infections compared with standard therapy. A study for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia is planned.

Topics: Animals; beta-Lactamase Inhibitors; Cephalosporins; Clinical Trials as Topic; Enterobacteriaceae; Escherichia coli; Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections; Humans; Intraabdominal Infections; Investigational New Drug Application; Klebsiella Infections; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Penicillanic Acid; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Tazobactam; Treatment Outcome; Urinary Tract Infections

FR264205 is a novel parenteral 3'-aminopyrazolium cephalosporin. This study evaluated the in vitro and in vivo activities of FR264205 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The MIC of FR264205 at which 90% of 193 clinical isolates of P. aeruginosa were inhibited was 1 microg/ml, 8- to 16-fold lower than those of ceftazidime (CAZ), imipenem (IPM), and ciprofloxacin (CIP). FR264205 also exhibited this level of activity against CAZ-, IPM-, and CIP-resistant P. aeruginosa. The reduction in the susceptibility of FR264205 by AmpC beta-lactamase was lower than that of CAZ, indicating a relatively high stability of FR264205 against AmpC beta-lactamase, the main resistance mechanism for cephalosporins. Neither expression of efflux pumps nor deficiency of OprD decreased the activity of FR264205. No spontaneous resistance mutants were selected in the presence of FR264205, and the reduction in susceptibility to FR264205 was lower than that to CAZ, IPM, and CIP after serial passage, suggesting that FR264205 has a low propensity for selecting resistance. In murine pulmonary, urinary tract, and burn wound models of infection caused by P. aeruginosa, the efficacy of FR264205 was superior or comparable to those of CAZ and IPM. These results indicate that FR264205 should have good potential as an antibacterial agent for P. aeruginosa.

Topics: Animals; beta-Lactamases; Burns; Cephalosporins; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Lung Diseases; Mice; Mice, Inbred ICR; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Mutation; Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Pseudomonas Infections; Urinary Tract Infections; Wound Infection