fosfomycin and Prostatic-Neoplasms

Infection-related complications secondary to quinolone resistance have been on the rise following transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate (TRUSBP). The aim of this review was to compare the efficacy of fosfomycin with quinolone-based antibiotic prophylaxis for TRUSBP.. A systematic review in line with the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines was conducted. All studies comparing fosfomycin vs. non-fosfomycin antimicrobial prophylaxis for TRUSBP were considered. The main outcomes were number of urinary tract infections (UTIs) (overall, afebrile, febrile, and urosepsis) and fluoroqinolone resistance. Secondary outcomes were positive urine and blood cultures, and adverse effects of drugs.. Five studies comparing fosfomycin and non-fosfomycin antimicrobials were included in the review. In all, 1447 and 1665 patients were included in the fosfomycin and non-fosfomycin cohorts, respectively. The systematic review report significantly lower UTIs in the fosfomycin cohort (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI), 0.20 (0.13, 0.30), p < 0.00001. Urine cultures from patients given fosfomycin showed significantly lower resistance rates (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.27 (0.15, 0.50), p < 0.0001. The adverse effect profile between the two cohorts were similar (M-H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.13 (0.51, 2.50), p = 0.33. On Grade Pro evaluation, overall UTI, afebrile UTI, febrile UTI, and urosepsis were rates as moderate, low, very low, and moderate quality evidence, respectively. Positive blood and urine culture were rated as moderate and very low-quality evidence, respectively. Fluoroquinolone resistance was rated as low-quality evidence. Adverse effects was rated as very low-quality evidence.. This review suggests that fosfomycin has significantly lower septic complications with an equivalent side effect profile in comparison with quinolone-based prophylaxis regimen for TRUSBP. There is an urgent need for appropriate antibiotic stewardship and it is paramount that studies with robust methodology are developed to establish the role of fosfomycin over existing antibiotic regimens for TRUSBP.

Topics: Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacterial Infections; Fosfomycin; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quinolones; Ultrasonography

Prostate biopsy is the gold standard for prostate cancer diagnosis; unfortunately, this procedure is not free from complications. Recent studies have shown an increase in antibiotic resistance. The aim of our prospective randomized study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a prostate biopsy prophylaxis protocol using 2 vs. 3 fosfomycin doses.. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients undergoing transrectal systematic ultrasound (US)-guided (n = 277) or transrectal fusion prostate biopsy (n = 20) were prospectively evaluated and randomized by date of birth, to receive 2 (even years, group A) versus 3 doses of fosfomycin (odd years, group B), and prospectively evaluated.. Two hundred and ninety-seven patients were randomized to group A (n = 162) or group B (n = 135). The 2 groups were comparable with respect to age, comorbidity, PSA value, prostate volume, operative time and urine culture results. Out of 297 patients, 44 (14.8%) developed complications after the procedure; 2.7% (8/297) of patients developed fever >38° requiring hospitalization (6 [3.7%] in group A and 2 [1.5%] in group B, p = 0.29). Patients who underwent fusion biopsy were more frequently readmitted in comparison with patients undergoing US-guided prostate biopsy (p = 0.000).. The low fever and prostatitis rate suggest that fosfomycin prophylaxis is safe and efficient. There is no significant difference in clinical outcome between the 2 dosage regimens.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacterial Infections; Clinical Protocols; Fosfomycin; Humans; Image-Guided Biopsy; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rectum; Treatment Outcome

To investigate whether switching ciprofloxacin to fosfomycin in the case of fluoroquinolone-resistant rectal bacteria influences the incidence of infectious complications after transrectal prostate biopsy.. From December 2015 until December 2017, patients undergoing prostate biopsy were randomly assigned to a control group or an intervention group in a prospective, open-label fashion at three different centers. The presence of fluoroquinolone-resistant organisms was detected by rectal swabs. Patients in the control group received ciprofloxacin. Patients in the intervention group received fosfomycin instead of ciprofloxacin in the case of fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria on rectal swab culture. The primary end-point was the difference in occurrence of major (febrile) and minor (afebrile) infections between both groups.. A total of 102 patients were randomized to the control group, and 102 patients to the intervention group. In the control group, nine complications occurred, of which five were major febrile complications. In the intervention group, six complications occurred, of which four were major febrile complications. The total number of complications (major and minor) did not differ between both groups (P = 0.59). A subgroup analysis of patients with fluoroquinolone-resistant bacteria on rectal swab showed five complications in the control group and one complication in the intervention group (P = 0.09).. This represents the first prospective randomized study using rectal cultures for targeted antibiotic prophylaxis. Study findings show promising results for use of fosfomycin in patients with fluoroquinolone resistance.

Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Antibiotic Prophylaxis; Bacteria; Biopsy, Large-Core Needle; Ciprofloxacin; Drug Resistance, Bacterial; Drug Substitution; Fosfomycin; Humans; Incidence; Male; Microbial Sensitivity Tests; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Prospective Studies; Prostate; Prostatic Neoplasms; Rectum; Treatment Outcome