Page last updated: 2024-08-23

fomesafen and Lacrimal Duct Obstruction

fomesafen has been researched along with Lacrimal Duct Obstruction in 3 studies

Research

Studies (3)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (33.33)18.7374
1990's1 (33.33)18.2507
2000's1 (33.33)29.6817
2010's0 (0.00)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Baum, JL1
Freedman, HL1
Doughman, DJ1

Other Studies

3 other study(ies) available for fomesafen and Lacrimal Duct Obstruction

ArticleYear
Basal vs reflex lacrimation.
    Archives of ophthalmology (Chicago, Ill. : 1960), 1999, Volume: 117, Issue:1

    Topics: Humans; Infant, Newborn; Infant, Premature; Lacrimal Apparatus; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction; Reflex; Tears

1999
Micro-Reflux [correction of Micro-Reflex] Test vs. the Kleenex test.
    Ophthalmology, 2001, Volume: 108, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Child; Child, Preschool; Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological; Humans; Infant; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction; Nasolacrimal Duct; Reflex

2001
Pathophysiology and diagnosis of tear film abnormalities. Clinical tests.
    International ophthalmology clinics, 1973,Spring, Volume: 13, Issue:1

    Topics: Biopsy; Conjunctiva; Eye Diseases; Hexosamines; Humans; Keratoconjunctivitis; Lacrimal Apparatus; Lacrimal Duct Obstruction; Methods; Mucus; Muramidase; Necrosis; Pemphigus; Proteins; Radiography; Reflex; Rose Bengal; Secretory Rate; Staining and Labeling; Tears

1973