fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination and Respiratory-Sounds

fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination has been researched along with Respiratory-Sounds* in 2 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination and Respiratory-Sounds

ArticleYear
Salmeterol and fluticasone in young children with multiple-trigger wheeze.
    Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology, 2012, Volume: 109, Issue:1

    Treatment guidelines recommend using an inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) plus a long-acting β(2)-agonist (LABA) for childhood asthma when the symptoms are not controlled by ICS alone, but the appropriate use of LABAs in children continues to be debated.. To compare the efficacy of an inhaled salmeterol and fluticasone propionate combination, 50/100 μg twice daily, with fluticasone propionate, 100 μg twice daily, or salmeterol, 50 μg twice daily, in children with multiple-trigger wheeze.. A total of 105 children 4 to 7 years of age with multiple-trigger wheezing based on respiratory symptoms and bronchodilator responsiveness and/or exercise-induced bronchoconstriction without a viral cold were randomized to salmeterol-fluticasone, fluticasone propionate alone, or salmeterol alone via a metered-dose inhaler and a spacer device for 8 weeks. The primary efficacy outcome was exhaled nitric oxide level. Secondary outcomes were lung function measurements via impulse oscillometry, respiratory symptoms, and rescue medication use.. The exhaled nitric oxide levels decreased after all treatments, significantly more so after salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone than with salmeterol (adjusted geometric means at 8 weeks: salmeterol-fluticasone, 9.4 ppb; fluticasone, 9.3 ppb; salmeterol, 13.9 ppb; salmeterol-fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .02; fluticasone vs salmeterol, P = .01). No treatment differences were found with respect to respiratory symptoms or median rescue use. Salmeterol-fluticasone resulted in a small but statistically significant improvement in baseline lung function compared with fluticasone. All treatments were equally well tolerated.. The effects of salmeterol-fluticasone and fluticasone were comparable, although lung function improvement was better with salmeterol-fluticasone than with fluticasone alone. There is no obvious benefit in initiation therapy with salmeterol-fluticasone rather than fluticasone alone in the treatment of steroid-naive children with multiple-trigger wheeze.. Pathway of clinical trial registry of Helsinki University:http://www.hus.fi/?Path=1;28;2530;9899;9900;23618;23903;33578.

    Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Breath Tests; Bronchodilator Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Male; Nitric Oxide; Precipitating Factors; Respiratory Sounds; Salmeterol Xinafoate; Treatment Outcome

2012

Other Studies

1 other study(ies) available for fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination and Respiratory-Sounds

ArticleYear
An Acoustic-Based Method to Detect and Quantify the Effect of Exhalation into a Dry Powder Inhaler.
    Journal of aerosol medicine and pulmonary drug delivery, 2015, Volume: 28, Issue:4

    Dry powder inhaler (DPI) users frequently exhale into their inhaler mouthpiece before the inhalation step. This error in technique compromises the integrity of the drug and results in poor bronchodilation. This study investigated the effect of four exhalation factors (exhalation flow rate, distance from mouth to inhaler, exhalation duration, and relative air humidity) on dry powder dose delivery. Given that acoustic energy can be related to the factors associated with exhalation sounds, we then aimed to develop a method of identifying and quantifying this critical inhaler technique error using acoustic based methods.. An in vitro test rig was developed to simulate this critical error. The effect of the four factors on subsequent drug delivery were investigated using multivariate regression models. In a further study we then used an acoustic monitoring device to unobtrusively record the sounds 22 asthmatic patients made whilst using a Diskus(™) DPI. Acoustic energy was employed to automatically detect and analyze exhalation events in the audio files.. All exhalation factors had a statistically significant effect on drug delivery (p<0.05); distance from the inhaler mouthpiece had the largest effect size. Humid air exhalations were found to reduce the fine particle fraction (FPF) compared to dry air. In a dataset of 110 audio files from 22 asthmatic patients, the acoustic method detected exhalations with an accuracy of 89.1%. We were able to classify exhalations occurring 5 cm or less in the direction of the inhaler mouthpiece or recording device with a sensitivity of 72.2% and specificity of 85.7%.. Exhaling into a DPI has a significant detrimental effect. Acoustic based methods can be employed to objectively detect and analyze exhalations during inhaler use, thus providing a method of remotely monitoring inhaler technique and providing personalized inhaler technique feedback.

    Topics: Acoustics; Administration, Inhalation; Aerosols; Air; Algorithms; Asthma; Bronchodilator Agents; Case-Control Studies; Drug Delivery Systems; Dry Powder Inhalers; Equipment Design; Exhalation; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Humidity; Inhalation; Lung; Multivariate Analysis; Powders; Regression Analysis; Respiratory Sounds; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted; Sound Spectrography; Time Factors

2015