fluticasone-propionate--salmeterol-xinafoate-drug-combination and Chronic-Disease

To determine where in the treatment steps recommended by the British Thoracic Society and Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (BTS/SIGN) Asthma Guideline it is cost-effective to use salmeterol xinafoate/fluticasone propionate combination inhaler (SFC) (Seretide) compared with other inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) containing regimens (with and without a long acting beta-2 agonist (LABA)) for chronic asthma in adults and children.. Meta-analyses of percentage symptom-free days (%SFD) were used within a cost-effectiveness model. Time spent in two asthma control health states, 'symptom-free' and 'with-symptoms' was used as the measure of differential treatment effectiveness. SFC was compared with varying doses of fluticasone propionate (FP) and beclometasone dipropionate (BDP) with or without a separate salmeterol inhaler, and with the budesonide/formoterol combination inhaler (BUD/FORM) (Symbicort). Drug costs, non-drug costs and quality adjusted life years (QALY) were incorporated into the analyses. Results are presented as cost per QALY ratios and uncertainty explored using probabilistic sensitivity analysis.. Compared with an increased dose of FP in adults, SFC either 'dominates' (i.e. cheaper and more effective) FP or the cost per QALY is 6852 pounds sterling. The cost per QALYs estimated in sensitivity analyses using BDP costs range from 5679 pounds sterling to 15,997 pounds sterling. For children the cost per QALY for SFC 50 Evohaler compared with an increased dose of FP is pound 15,739 pounds sterling. SFC is similarly clinically effective in improving %SFDs compared with FP plus salmeterol delivered in separate inhalers (mean differences for each dose comparison of -3.9 (low) (with a 95% confidence interval (CI): -12.96; 5.16); 4.10 (medium) (95% CI: -3.01; 11.21); -0.4 (high) (95% CI: -8.88; 8.08)) and BUD/FORM (mean difference of 0.40 (95% CI -3.69; 4.49)) in adults, and a cheaper SFC option is available at all doses (annual cost savings range from 18 pounds sterling-427 pounds sterling per patient). SFC was similarly effective compared with FP plus salmeterol in separate inhalers in children under 12 and also resulted in annual cost savings of between 47 pounds sterling and 77 pounds sterling. A number of other comparisons were also made and the results are available as electronic supplementary data.. This is the first analysis to estimate the cost-effectiveness of SFC in chronic asthma compared with multiple comparators and based on a systematic identification of relevant trials and data on %SFDs. The findings suggest that for adults and children uncontrolled on BDP 400 microg/day or equivalent it is a cost-effective option to switch to SFC (at an equivalent ICS dose) compared with increasing the dose of ICS. For adults and children aged 12 years and over who have passed this point and are uncontrolled on BDP 800 microg/day or equivalent, switching to SFC remains a cost-effective approach. Where an adult or child requires an ICS and a LABA to be co-prescribed, SFC is a cost-effective option compared with FP or BDP plus salmeterol delivered in separate inhalers. In adults who require combination therapy, SFC is a cost-effective option compared with BUD/FORM.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Child; Chronic Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Health Services; Hospitals, State; Humans; Models, Econometric; Nebulizers and Vaporizers

To observe the difference in the efficacy on the symptoms of bronchial asthma at the chronic persistent stage between acupoint heat-sensitive moxibustion and western medicine with Seretide.. Sixty-four cases were randomly divided into a heat-sensitive moxibustion group (32 cases) and a western medication group (32 cases). In the heat-sensitive moxibustion group, the sensitized points located between Feishu (BL 13) and Geshu (BL 17) or in the region 6-cun lateral from the 1st and the 2nd intercostal spaces of the chest were selected. The heat-sensitive moxibustion was adopted, continuously for 8 days, once per day. In the later 22 days of the 1st month, 12 treatments should be ensured. Two months later, 15 treatments should be guaranteed each month. The time of each treatment was 30 to 90 min. Totally 50 treatments were required. In the western medication group, Seretide inhaler was adopted, one inhalation each time, twice per day, for 3 months totally. The asthmatic symptoms were scored for the patients in two groups and the comparison was made between the two groups.. After 3 months of treatment, the asthmatic symptom scores were all improved for the patients in the heat-sensitive moxibustion group and the western medication group as compared with those before treatment (both P < 0.05). In 6 months of follow-up visit, the asthmatic symptom scores in the heat-sensitive moxibustion group were stable, but those in the western medication group were reduced, there was significant difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).. The acupoint heat-sensitive moxibustion effectively relieves the clinical symptoms for the patients with bronchial asthma at the chronic persistent stage. Its efficacy is similar to that of Seretide inhaler. But the long-term efficacy of the heat-sensitive moxibustion is much better.

Topics: Acupuncture Points; Adolescent; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Chronic Disease; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Male; Medicine, Chinese Traditional; Middle Aged; Moxibustion

Asthma is a major health problem and has significant mortality around the world. Although the symptoms can be controlled by drug treatment in most patients, effective low-risk, non-drug strategies could constitute a significant advance in asthma management. An increasing number of patients with asthma are attracted by acupuncture and moxibustion. Therefore, it is of importance that scientific evidence about the efficacy of this type of therapy is regarded. Our past researches suggested heat-sensitive moxibustion might be effective in treatment of asthma. Our objective is to investigate the effectiveness of heat-sensitive moxibustion compared with conventional drug treatment.. This study is comprised of a multi-centre (12 centers in China), randomized, controlled trial with two parallel arms (A: heat-sensitive moxibustion; B: conventional drug). Group A selects heat- sensitive acupoints from the rectangle region which consist of two outer lateral lines of dorsal Bladder Meridian of Foot-Taiyang, and two horizontal lines of BL13(Fei Shu) and BL17 (Ge Shu);6 inch outer the first and second rib gap of anterior chest. Group B treats with fluticasone/salmeterol (seretide). The outcome measures will be assessed over a 3-month period before each clinic visit at days 15, 30, 60, and 90. Follow-up visit will be at 3, 6 months after the last treatment session. Adverse event information will be collected at each clinic visit.. This trial will utilize high quality trial methodologies in accordance with CONSORT guidelines. It may provide evidence for the effectiveness of heat-sensitive moxibustion as a treatment for chronic moderate persistent asthma. Moreover, the result may propose a new type moxibustion to control asthma.. The trial is registered at Chinese Clinical Trials Registry: ChiCTR-TRC-09000599.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Chronic Disease; Clinical Protocols; Drug Combinations; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Middle Aged; Moxibustion; Research Design; Sample Size

To probe a better therapy for chronic persistent asthma.. Thirty-six cases of chronic persistent asthma were randomly divided into a beat-sensitive moxibustion group (17 cases) and a western medication group (19 cases). In heat-sensitive moxibustion group, the sensitization points between Feishu (BL 13) and Geshu (BL 17) were selected with heat-sensitive moxibustion; in western medication group, Seretide inhalant was applied. The patients of both groups were continuously treated for 3 months and the therapeutic effects were evaluated by clinical symptom scores and pulmonary ventilation function test.. After treatment, the effective rate of 88.2% (15/17) in heat-sensitive moxibustion group was superior to that of 47.4% (9/19) in western medication group (P < 0.05); the clinical symptom scores and pulmonary ventilation function were obviously improved in the two groups, and the heat-sensitive moxibustion group was superior to the western medication group (all P < 0.05).. For chronic persistent bronchial asthma, heat-sensitive moxibustion can improve the clinical symptoms and the pulmonary ventilation function, and it is better than Seretide inhalant.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Asthma; Chronic Disease; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Moxibustion; Pulmonary Ventilation; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (Symbicort SMART) improves asthma control compared with fixed-dose inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting beta(2)-agonist (ICS/LABA) regimens, but its efficacy has not been assessed in comparison with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone (Seretide) plus a short-acting beta(2)-agonist (SABA).. Patients (N=2309) with symptomatic asthma (aged 12 years; forced expiratory volume in 1s 50% predicted), who had experienced an asthma exacerbation in the previous year, were randomised to receive budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 microg two inhalations twice daily and as needed, or one inhalation of salmeterol/fluticasone 50/500 microg twice daily plus terbutaline as needed, for 6 months.. Time to first severe exacerbation, the pre-specified primary outcome, was not significantly prolonged (risk ratio 0.82; 95% confidence interval 0.63, 1.05). Budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduced total exacerbations from 31 to 25 events/100 patients/year (P=0.039), and exacerbations requiring hospitalisation/emergency room (ER) treatment from 13 to 9 events/100 patients/year (P=0.046). The treatments showed no difference in measures of lung function or asthma symptoms. The mean dose of ICS received was lower using budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy (792 microg/day budesonide [1238 microg/day beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) equivalent] versus 1000 microg/day fluticasone [2000 microg/day BDP equivalent] with salmeterol/fluticasone therapy; P<0.0001). Both treatments were well tolerated.. In the treatment of uncontrolled asthma, budesonide/formoterol maintenance and reliever therapy reduces the incidence of severe asthma exacerbations and hospitalisation/ER treatment with similar daily symptom control compared with sustained high-dose salmeterol/fluticasone plus SABA. This benefit is achieved with substantially less ICS exposure.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adolescent; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Asthmatic Agents; Asthma; Azides; Budesonide; Child; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Combinations; Drug Therapy, Combination; Ethanolamines; Female; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Formoterol Fumarate; Hospitalization; Humans; Lung; Male; Middle Aged; Proportional Hazards Models; Respiratory Function Tests; Serotonin; Treatment Outcome

Eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis (ECRS), a subgroup of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, is a refractory disease closely associated with bronchial asthma. We recently reported on the efficacy of ultra-fine particle inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) (hydrofluoroalkane-134a-beclomethasone dipropionate: HFA-BDP) exhalation through the nose (ETN) treatment for mild-to-moderate asthmatics with ECRS. However, the effect of HFA-BDP ETN was found to be transient in some cases with severe ECRS and asthma, requiring treatment with higher-dose ICS and long-acting β2-agonists (LABA). Here, we present a case of refractory ECRS with severe asthma treated with a combination of high-dose ICS and LABA ETN, and we discuss the mechanisms for its effectiveness.. A 57-year-old man was treated with the combined regimen of HFA-BDP ETN and salmeterol/fluticasone combination (SFC) dry powder inhaler (DPI) for his refractory ECRS with severe asthma. For better control, we replaced SFC-DPI with SFC metered-dose inhaler (MDI) ETN and evaluated the clinical effect and corticosteroid sensitivity. We also examined the flow and deposition of fine particles released by SFC-MDI ETN.. After switching to SFC-MDI ETN, the patient's conditions markedly resolved with the restoration of corticosteroid sensitivity and PP2A activity. The fine particles released by SFC-MDI ETN at least partially flowed out through the external nares and seemed to be deposited on the ethmoid sinus.. Fine particle ICS/LABA ETN might be an additional therapeutic option for refractory ECRS with severe asthma and corticosteroid insensitivity.
.

Topics: Asthma; Chronic Disease; Dry Powder Inhalers; Eosinophilia; Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination; Humans; Male; Metered Dose Inhalers; Middle Aged; Particle Size; Rhinitis; Severity of Illness Index; Sinusitis; Treatment Outcome