fluticasone and Nasal-Obstruction

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common allergic disease. It affects people worldwide and traditional Chinese medicine is becoming popular among AR patients because it has a definite clinical effect and there are few adverse reactions. Lung qi deficiency and cold syndrome (LQDCS) is a frequent type of AR, and the Chinese herbal medicine bimin decoction (BMD) is prescribed for it. This study compared the clinical efficacy of BMD for AR patients with LQDCS to the conventional medicine loratadine and fluticasone nasal spray.. The study was an open-label non-inferiority randomized controlled trial. A total of 108 AR patients with LQDCS aged 19 to 60 were randomly allocated in a 1:1 ratio to the BMD group or the control group by the central computer system in Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine from January 2017 to April 2018. In total, 98 participants completed the study (BMD group n = 51 and control group n = 47). Patients in the BMD group received BMD while those in the control group received fluticasone nasal spray and loratadine tablets for 4 weeks. The primary outcome was the change in the Total Nasal Symptom Score (TNSS) between the baseline and the end of treatment. Changes in the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal resistance, and acoustic rhinometry parameters were secondary outcomes. All side effects due to the treatments were recorded.. After the 4-week treatment, the total TNSS was significantly reduced in both groups compared to the baseline (P <  0.05). No significant between-groups differences were observed for changes in TNSS scores [- 0.298 (95% confidence interval -0.640 to 0.140)], which was within the defined non-inferiority margin. RQLQ in both groups decreased significantly (P <  0.001) from baseline, though a more obvious reduction was observed for the BMD group (P <  0.001). There were no significant differences in nasal resistance, nasal volume, or nasal minimum cross-sectional area between groups after treatment (P > 0.05).. These findings indicate that BMD helps relieve the symptoms of perennial AR and improves rhinitis-related quality of life. Our study indicates that BMD is non-inferior to loratadine tablets and fluticasone nasal spray for AR patients with LQDCS.. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-INR-16010063. Registered on 2 December 2016.

Topics: Adult; Anti-Allergic Agents; Drugs, Chinese Herbal; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Loratadine; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Sprays; Quality of Life; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Sneezing; Surveys and Questionnaires; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common, high-morbidity chronic inflammatory disease, and patients often experience suboptimal outcomes with current medical treatment. The exhalation delivery system with fluticasone (EDS-FLU) may improve care by increasing superior/posterior intranasal corticosteroid deposition.. To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EDS-FLU versus EDS-placebo in patients with nasal polyps (NP). Coprimary end points were change in nasal congestion and polyp grade. Key secondary end points were Sino-Nasal Outcome Test-22 (SNOT-22) and Medical Outcomes Study Sleep Scale-Revised (MOS Sleep-R). Other prespecified end points included all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), Rhinosinusitis Disability Index (RSDI), and key indicators for surgical intervention.. Randomized, double-blind, EDS-placebo-controlled, multicenter study.. Three hundred twenty-three subjects with NP and moderate-severe congestion/obstruction, most with history of corticosteroid use (94.4%) and/or prior surgery (60.4%), were randomized to EDS-FLU 93 µg, 186 µg, or 372 µg or EDS-placebo twice daily (BID) for 24 weeks (16 double-blind + 8 single-arm extension with EDS-FLU 372 µg BID).. All EDS-FLU doses produced significant improvement in both coprimary end points ( P < .05) and in SNOT-22 total score ( P ≤ .005). EDS-FLU significantly improved all 4 cardinal symptoms of NP ( P < .05), including congestion/obstruction, facial pain/pressure, rhinorrhea/post-nasal drip, and hyposmia/anosmia. Approximately 80% of subjects reported improvement with EDS-FLU, with 65% reporting "much" or "very much" improvement by week 16. Adverse events were generally local in nature and similar to other intranasal steroids studied for similar durations in similar populations, with the most common being epistaxis.. In patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with NP (CRSwNP) who were symptomatic despite high rates of prior intranasal steroid use and/or surgery, EDS-FLU produced statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements compared to EDS-placebo in multiple subjective and objective outcomes (symptoms, SNOT-22, RSDI, SF-36, PGIC, and NP grade), including all 4 cardinal symptoms of CRSwNP.

Topics: Adult; Chronic Disease; Double-Blind Method; Drug Delivery Systems; Exhalation; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Polyps; Neoplasm Grading; Placebo Effect; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this study was to compare 2 methods of nasal irrigation after septoplasty. The combined use of low-pressure, high-volume nasal saline (LPHVNS) irrigation, together with fluticasone propionate (FP) (LPHVNS+FP), was compared with high-pressure, low-volume nasal saline (HPLVNS) irrigation during the early postoperative period following septoplasty.. Seventy-three patients undergoing septoplasty for nasal obstruction were recruited for the study. The patients were randomly divided into 2 groups; nasal irrigation was applied for 4 weeks in both groups. Group 1 (n = 40) used HPLVNS irrigation. Group 2 (n = 33) used the LPHVNS+FP combination. The patients were evaluated using the visual analogue scale (VAS), Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE), nasal examination scores, acoustic rhinometry, rhinomanometry, and peak nasal inspiratory flowmetry (PNIF) measurements.. In group 2, the increase in VAS results was more prominent than in group 1. NOSE scores were significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1. The nasal examination revealed that group 2 had less edema and less crusting than group 1. The decrease in nasal airway resistance was significantly higher in group 2. The PNIF values increased to a significantly greater extent in group 2 than in group 1.. Nasal irrigation with the LPHVNS+FP combination during the early postoperative period following septoplasty is an effective method, resulting not only in increased patient satisfaction and nasal air flow but also in decreased edema and crust formation.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Edema; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Lavage; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Septum; Patient Satisfaction; Postoperative Care; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Rhinoplasty; Single-Blind Method; Young Adult

Chronic rhinosinusitis is a common inflammatory condition in western countries. Nasal polyposis has different symptoms such as nasal obstruction, anterior or posterior nasal drip, reduced sense of smell, and facial pain. Medical and endoscopic treatments are the two main treatments for nasal polyposis. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of different methods on olfactory function. This is a non-randomized clinical trial study that was done on 60 patients who were divided into two groups (medical and surgical). Patients were matched based on age, history of smoking, and the severity of obstruction. The radiologist score of Lund-Mackay staging system was used to match patients in two arms of the trial based on the severity of nasal obstruction. Patients in surgery groups underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery under general anesthesia and then received Fluticasone propionate nasal spray for 8 weeks (400 mcg bd). Patients in the medical group were only prescribed with Fluticasone propionate with the same duration and same dose as mentioned. As a result of treatment protocol, both medical and surgical group experienced improvement in olfactory function but statistical analyses revealed that surgery resulted in better resolution of symptoms. Our observation revealed that combined treatment had a better effect than medical treatment in restoring olfaction in patients with nasal polyposis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chronic Disease; Combined Modality Therapy; Endoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Polyps; Nasal Sprays; Olfaction Disorders; Paranasal Sinuses; Rhinitis; Sinusitis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

It is unclear what constitutes a clinically meaningful response for allergic rhinitis (AR) outcomes. The objectives of these post hoc analyses were (1) to define a clinically meaningful response using novel efficacy analyses (including a responder analysis), and (2) to compare the efficacy of MP29-02 [a novel intranasal formulation of azelastine hydrochloride (AZE) and fluticasone propionate (FP)] with commercially available FP, AZE and placebo in seasonal AR (SAR) patients, using these novel analyses.. 610 moderate-to-severe SAR patients (≥12 years old) were randomized into a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 14-day, parallel-group trial. Change from baseline in the reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) over 14 days was the primary outcome. Post hoc endpoints included the sum of nasal and ocular symptoms (rT7SS), efficacy by disease severity and by predominant nasal symptom, and a set of responder analyses.. MP29-02 most effectively reduced rT7SS (relative greater improvement: 52% to FP; 56% to AZE) and both nasal and ocular symptoms irrespective of severity. More MP29-02 patients achieved a ≥30, ≥50, ≥60, ≥75 and ≥90% rTNSS reduction, which occurred days faster than with either active comparator; MP29-02 alone was superior to placebo at the ≥60% (or higher) threshold. One in 2 MP29-02 patients achieved a ≥50% rTNSS reduction and 1 in 6 achieved complete/near-to-complete response. Only MP29-02 was consistently superior to placebo for all patients, whatever their predominant symptom.. MP29-02 provided faster and more complete symptom control than first-line therapies. It was consistently superior irrespective of severity, response criteria or patient-type, and may be considered the drug of choice for moderate-to-severe AR. These measures define a new standard for assessing relevance in AR.

Topics: Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cedrus; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Phthalazines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Severity of Illness Index; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Moderate-to-severe allergic rhinitis (AR) is a challenge to treat, with many patients using multiple therapies and achieving limited symptom control. More effective therapies must be developed and tested in well-controlled, randomized, prospective studies with a direct comparison to current standards.. The aim of these studies was to investigate the efficacy of MP29-02 (a novel formulation of azelastine and fluticasone propionate [FP]) in patients with moderate-to-severe seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) and to compare its efficacy with 2 first-line therapies (ie, intranasal azelastine and intranasal FP) in this population.. Three thousand three hundred ninety-eight patients (≥12 years old) with moderate-to-severe SAR were enrolled into 3 multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo- and active-controlled, parallel-group trials (MP4002 [NCT00651118], MP4004 [NCT00740792], and MP4006 [NCT00883168]). Each trial was conducted for 14 days during different allergy seasons. The primary efficacy variable was the sum of the morning and evening change from baseline in reflective total nasal symptom score (range, 0-24) over the treatment period. Outcomes for the meta-analysis included efficacy according to disease severity and time to response in relevant responder criteria.. In the meta-analysis MP29-02 reduced the mean reflective total nasal symptom score from baseline (-5.7 [SD, 5.3]) more than FP (-5.1 [SD, 4.9], P < .001), azelastine (-4.4 [SD, 4.8], P < .001), or placebo (-3.0 [SD, 4.2], P < .001). This benefit was observed from the first day of assessment, with improvement in each individual nasal symptom, even in the patients with the most severe disease. MP29-02 achieved response consistently days earlier and showed greater efficacy in patients with moderate-to-severe rhinitis than FP and azelastine.. MP29-02 represents a novel therapy that demonstrated superiority to 2 first-line therapies for AR. Patients with moderate-to-severe SAR achieved better control, and their symptoms were controlled earlier with MP29-02 than with recommended medications according to guidelines.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Androstadienes; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Female; Fluticasone; Guidelines as Topic; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Phthalazines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Seasons; Severity of Illness Index; Young Adult

A proof-of-concept study suggested that combination therapy with commercial azelastine hydrochloride nasal spray and fluticasone propionate nasal spray significantly improved nasal symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with either agent alone.. To compare an azelastine-fluticasone combination nasal spray administered in a single-delivery device with a commercially available azelastine nasal spray and fluticasone nasal spray.. This 14-day, multicenter, randomized, double-blind study was conducted during the Texas mountain cedar season. After a 5-day placebo lead-in, 610 patients with moderate-to-severe nasal symptoms were randomized to treatment with (1) azelastine nasal spray, (2) fluticasone nasal spray, (3) combination azelastine and fluticasone nasal spray, or (4) placebo nasal spray. All treatments were given as 1 spray per nostril twice daily. The primary efficacy variable was the change from baseline in the total nasal symptom score (TNSS), consisting of nasal congestion, runny nose, itchy nose, and sneezing.. All 3 active groups were statistically superior (P

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adolescent; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Allergens; Androstadienes; Cedrus; Child; Double-Blind Method; Drug Combinations; Drug Synergism; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Phthalazines; Pollen; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal

Nasal side effects are common in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) starting on nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. We tested the hypothesis that heated humidification or nasal topical steroids improve compliance, nasal side effects and quality of life in this patient group.. 125 patients with the established diagnosis of OSAS (apnea/hypopnea index > or = 10/h), who tolerated CPAP via a nasal mask, and who had a successful CPAP titration were randomized to 4 weeks of dry CPAP, humidified CPAP or CPAP with additional topical nasal steroid application (fluticasone, GlaxoWellcome). Groups were similar in all demographic variables and in frequency of nasal symptoms at baseline. Outcome measures were objective compliance, quality of life (short form 36), subjective sleepiness (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score) and nasal symptoms such as runny, dry or blocked nose, sneezing and headaches; all variables assessed using a validated questionnaire and by direct interview.. There was no difference in compliance between groups after 4 weeks (dry: 5.21 +/- 1.66 h/night, fluticasone: 5.66 +/- 1.68, humidifier: 5.21 +/- 1.84; p = 0.444). Quality of life and subjective sleepiness improved in all groups, but there were no differences in the extent of improvement. Nasal Symptoms were less frequently reported in the humidifier group (28%) than in the remaining groups (dry: 70%, fluticasone: 53%, p = 0.002). However, the addition of fluticasone resulted in increased frequency of sneezing.. The addition of a humidifier, but not nasal steroids decreases the frequency of nasal symptoms in unselected OSAS patients initiating CPAP therapy; however compliance and quality of life remain unaltered.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Analysis of Variance; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Continuous Positive Airway Pressure; Female; Fluticasone; Hot Temperature; Humans; Humidity; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Patient Compliance; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Respiratory Physiological Phenomena; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Surveys and Questionnaires

We assessed the efficacy of different forms of fluticasone propionate in the treatment of bilateral nasal polyposis in adult patients.. This double-blind, randomized, parallel group study included 34 patients, aged 16 years or over, with a diagnosis of bilateral nasal polyposis. The patients were randomized to three groups to receive fluticasone propionate in the form of aqueous nasal spray 100 microg twice daily, or nasal drop preparation 400 microg once or twice daily for 12 weeks. Once every four weeks, nasal volumes were measured by acoustic rhinometry and polyp size was assessed by a 4-mm rigid endoscope. Clinical symptom scores were assessed once a week.. The mean nasal polyp scores decreased significantly in all the groups (p<0.005). Total nasal volume did not improve significantly with the nasal spray. Although single daily nasal drop application increased total nasal volume significantly only at the end of treatment (p<0.05), increases with twice daily application were significant at 4, 8, and 12 weeks, compared to the baseline values and corresponding values of the other two groups (p<0.005). Nasal blockage and rhinitis symptom scores improved in all the groups (p<0.05), but the difference from the baseline was highest with twice daily nasal drop application. Smelling showed a significant improvement only with twice daily nasal drop application (p<0.05). In none of the groups did nasal discomfort scores differ significantly from the baseline at the end of treatment.. Nasal drop preparation of fluticasone propionate given twice daily showed the highest efficacy in increasing total nasal volume, decreasing nasal polyp size, and improving smelling and nasal blockage.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Aerosols; Aged; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Double-Blind Method; Endoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Polyps; Nose; Prospective Studies; Rhinitis; Rhinometry, Acoustic; Smell; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Fluticasone propionate (FP) aqueous nasal spray was objectively found to be effective and safe for the treatment of lower turbinate enlargement in patients with vasomotor rhinitis.. To assess the efficacy of FP aqueous nasal spray treatment in lower turbinate hypertrophy due to vasomotor rhinitis using CT.. Of 35 patients with hypertrophic lower turbinates due to vasomotor rhinitis, 20 were treated twice daily with FP aqueous nasal spray (200 microg/day) for 3 months continuously and 15 were treated with placebo vehicle as a control group. The local effect of the nasal spray was studied using CT and visual analog scales.. Treatment with FP provided significantly greater relief from the symptom of nasal obstruction compared with placebo over the entire 3-month treatment period (p < 0.001). When the change from baseline was compared between the two groups, FP produced statistically significant reductions in the mucosal area of the lower turbinates and in the thickness of the nasal mucosa after 3 months (p < 0.05).

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chronic Disease; Endoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Hypertrophy; Male; Nasal Obstruction; Physical Examination; Prospective Studies; Rhinitis, Vasomotor; Surveys and Questionnaires; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome; Turbinates

Combination of inhaled steroid and long-acting beta-agonists has synergistic effects in asthma.. To investigate whether nasal corticosteroid and long-acting beta-agonists have synergistic effects on allergen-induced nasal responses.. The effects of intranasal treatment with fluticasone p-MDI (50 microg bid), salmeterol p-MDI (25 microg bid), their combination, and placebo, on nasal symptoms, eosinophil differential cell count and albumin in nasal lavage fluid (measures of inflammation and leakage respectively) and nasal electrical potential difference (measure of epithelial integrity) were studied in 11 atopic subjects with rhinitis, in a randomized, partially-blinded, 4-period, cross-over study. The measurements were made at baseline, at the end of 1 week of treatment, and immediately after a nasal allergen provocation.. Allergen-induced sneeze, postnasal drip and nasal obstruction were significantly reduced by fluticasone, but not by salmeterol. Eosinophil count in postallergen nasal lavage fluid was significantly less after fluticasone (median 1.9%, IQR 4.6) and salmeterol treatment (median 2.5%, IQR 8.5) compared with placebo (median 12.5%, IQR 27.9). Compared with placebo, both fluticasone and salmeterol attenuated allergen-induced change in nasal potential (mean change from baseline -18.5, +0.4 and -7.2% respectively) and the increase in nasal albumin (median 154, 119 and 130 ng/ml respectively). Combination treatment did not have any additional benefits over the individual therapies.. Although salmeterol has anti-inflammatory properties, intranasal salmeterol or its combination with fluticasone do not offer any added benefit over intranasal fluticasone alone for allergen-induced nasal responses.

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Adrenergic beta-Agonists; Adult; Albuterol; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Bronchodilator Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Drug Synergism; Drug Therapy, Combination; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Membrane Potentials; Nasal Lavage Fluid; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Provocation Tests; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Salmeterol Xinafoate

The safety and efficacy of intranasal corticosteroids for the treatment of allergic rhinitis is well documented in the literature. Additionally, an expert panel has concluded that intranasal corticosteroids are the first line of therapy when obstruction is a major component of rhinitis. Montelukast is a leukotriene receptor antagonist recently approved for the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR).. This randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of a 15-day course of intranasal fluticasone propionate 200 microg, once daily (FP200QD), to oral montelukast 10 mg, once daily (MON10QD), in relieving daytime and nighttime nasal symptoms associated with SAR.. The intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis population consisted of 705 eligible males and females (> or = 15 years) with SAR randomized to either FP200QD (N = 353) or MON10QD (N = 352). The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean change from baseline in subject-rated daytime total nasal symptom scores (the sum of four individual scores: nasal congestion, itching, rhinorrhea, and sneezing), evaluated via visual analog scales, and averaged over weeks 1 to 2. Secondary endpoints included the four daytime individual nasal symptom scores, the nighttime total, and individual nasal symptom scores (each evaluated on a four-point scale from 0 to 3).. Statistically significant differences favoring FP200QD over MON10QD were observed for the mean change from baseline in daytime total nasal symptom scores (P < 0.001), daytime individual nasal symptom scores (P < 0.001), nighttime total (P < 0.001), and all individual nasal symptom scores (P < or = 0.002) over the 15-day treatment period. FP200QD and MON10QD were both well tolerated.. The results of this well controlled study demonstrated that FP200QD was consistently superior to MON10QD with regard to every efficacy endpoint evaluated, including daytime and nighttime nasal congestion, in subjects with SAR.

Topics: Acetates; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Cyclopropanes; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Leukotriene Antagonists; Loratadine; Male; Nasal Obstruction; Pruritus; Quinolines; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Sneezing; Sulfides

Acoustic rhinometry (AR) was used for objective measurements of nasal cavity dimensions in conjunction with a 100-mm horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) for simultaneous subjective assessments of nasal sensations of airflow. Studies were conducted on 45 patients with perennial allergic rhinitis before, during and after a 2-week period of treatment with oral emedastine difumarate, azelastine hydrochloride, and xiao qing long tang (a homeopathic decongestant), as well as intranasal fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray. During the treatment period, there was a significant increase in the right and left minimum cross-sectional areas (MCA) of the nose and/or nasal cavity volumes (NCV) in all groups. The average increase in MCA ranged from 21-39% after 1 week of treatment and 16-39% after 2 weeks, whereas that in the NCV ranged from 16-24% and 19-24%, respectively. Post-treatment measurements were not significantly different from the corresponding pre-treatment ones. These findings were in close agreement with that obtained with VAS, demonstrating that AR can be used to validate the application of VAS in the evaluation of nasal airflow during medical therapy.

Topics: Acoustics; Administration, Intranasal; Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Benzimidazoles; Evaluation Studies as Topic; Female; Fluticasone; Follow-Up Studies; Histamine H1 Antagonists; Homeopathy; Humans; Imidazoles; Male; Middle Aged; Naphazoline; Nasal Cavity; Nasal Decongestants; Nasal Obstruction; Nose; Phthalazines; Pulmonary Ventilation; Reproducibility of Results; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of intranasally administered fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms or 100 micrograms (half the adult dosage) when administered once daily for 4 weeks to children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group clinical study in 10 pediatric outpatient centers.. Children (n = 249), 4 to 11 years of age, with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis, positive skin test reaction to a local autumn allergen, and a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis.. Clinician- and patient-rated nasal symptom scores (obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, itching), clinician-rated assessment of overall response to treatment, patient-rated nasal obstruction on awakening, and use of rescue medication. Clinicians questioned patients (or parents) regarding symptoms and adverse events. Morning plasma cortisol concentrations and 24-hour urinary excretion of cortisol and 17-ketogenic steroids were evaluated.. Intranasal fluticasone propionate, 200 micrograms or 100 micrograms once daily, was significantly more effective than placebo in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis in children. Clinician- and patient-rated symptom scores indicated greater improvement in nasal symptoms, including nasal obstruction on awakening, among patients receiving intranasal fluticasone propionate. Overall response to treatment was also significantly greater in the active treatment groups. The two fluticasone propionate groups were not statistically different. Mean morning plasma cortisol concentrations and 24-hour urinary excretion of free cortisol and 17-ketogenic steroids were similar across all groups both before and after treatment.. Intranasal fluticasone propionate, 100 micrograms (half the adult dose) or 200 micrograms given once daily for 4 weeks is effective and well tolerated in children 4 to 11 years of age with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

Topics: Administration, Intranasal; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Child; Child, Preschool; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Nasal Obstruction; Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal; Treatment Outcome

Long-term use of decongestant nasal spray (alpha adrenergic agonist) causes nasal congestion by rhinitis medicamentosa.. We clinically reviewed the cases of 33 patients of rhinitis medicamentosa (23 men, 10 women; mean age, 44.4±15.6 years) treated with nasal steroid sprays instead of decongestant nasal sprays in our clinic from October, 2011 to December, 2012.. Periods of drug use were generally long. Only 7 cases had a duration of use less than 1 year, and about half (48.5%) had a duration of use longer than 2 years. Causes of use included acute inflammation (n=6), chronic rhinosinusitis (n=2), and allergic rhinitis (n=20) and unknown cause (n=5). About two-third of the patients failed to answer questions concerning their use of decongestant nasal spray in a questionnaire prior to examination; therefore, careful observation was necessary. Among the 33 cases, 31 were followed up, all of whom showed improvement and stopped using decongestant nasal spays within 4 weeks. Periods for recovery were as follows: 3 days in 19 cases (61.3%) and 1 week in 25 cases (80.6%). Duration of drug use did not correlate with the period required for recovery; therefore, these results suggest that patients with long-term drug use are able to improve quickly.. Rhinitis medicamentosa with nasal congestion appears readily reversible with suitable treatment.

Topics: Adolescent; Adrenergic alpha-Agonists; Adult; Aged; Androstadienes; Drug Substitution; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Decongestants; Nasal Obstruction; Nasal Sprays; Pregnadienediols; Retrospective Studies; Rhinitis; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

The present study was performed to evaluate the effect of mometasone furoate on a nasal congestion model in Brown Norway rats.. Nasal congestion in rats sensitized with toluene-2,4-diisocyanate (TDI) was measured using whole-body plethysmography which allowed animals to move freely.. Penh (enhanced pause), an index of nasal congestion, was significantly increased after 5% TDI challenge in sensitized rats compared with that in non-sensitized rats. The peak of the increase in Penh appeared at 1 and 5 h after TDI challenge. A single topical administration of mometasone furoate (0.05%) at 1 h before TDI challenge suppressed the increase of Penh in sensitized rats. A significant effect was observed 5-6 h after nasal administration. Almost the same results were obtained with fluticasone propionate (0.05%).. Mometasone furoate may therefore be effective and have a rapid onset of action in nasal congestion when used clinically as with fluticasone propionate.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Androstadienes; Animals; Anti-Allergic Agents; Disease Models, Animal; Fluticasone; Male; Mometasone Furoate; Nasal Mucosa; Nasal Obstruction; Plethysmography, Whole Body; Pregnadienediols; Rats; Rats, Inbred BN; Respiratory Mechanics; Time Factors

To investigate the effect of fluticasone propionate (FP) on the symptom of nasal obstruction and to assess the correlation between the subjective visual analogue score (VAS) and the objective acoustic rhinometry (AR) measurements.. A prospective study of 45 consecutive patients, 30 males and 15 females with a mean age of 27 years (range: 16-59 years), with moderate/severe symptoms of perennial rhinitis who were treated by FP nasal spray for 4 weeks. AR and VAS were used to evaluate, compare and correlate the efficacy of FP nasal sprays.. There was a significant improvement in the VAS post-treatment (3.9) compared with pre-treatment (6.3). There was also a significant increase in the nasal volume (V) and minimum cross-sectional area (MCA) after intranasal FP. Good correlation between the total MCA and total V was noted. Subjective improvements in symptoms did not correlate well with objective measurements as the correlation between VAS and AR was poor.. Our study provides subjective and objective evidence on the efficacy of intranasal FP in improving nasal obstruction in perennial rhinitis. AR also proved to be a useful instrument in monitoring the effectiveness of medical therapy for perennial rhinitis.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nasal Obstruction; Prospective Studies; Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial; Rhinometry, Acoustic; Treatment Outcome