fluticasone and Esophageal-Stenosis

Eosinophilic oesophagitis is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disorder of the oesophagus, characterized by symptoms of dysphagia or food bolus obstruction. Diagnosis is supported by typical histological findings. This article covers pertinent aspects of the disease, pathogenic explanations and treatment options.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Budesonide; Cytokines; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Fluticasone; Humans; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Th2 Cells

The role of esophageal dilation in patients with esophageal eosinophilia with dysphagia remains unknown. The practice of dilation is currently based on center preferences and expert opinion. The aim of this study is to determine if, and to what extent, dysphagia improves in response to initial esophageal dilation followed by standard medical therapies. We conducted a randomized, blinded, controlled trial evaluating adult patients with dysphagia and newly diagnosed esophageal eosinophilia from 2008 to 2013. Patients were randomized to dilation or no dilation at time of endoscopy and blinded to dilation status. Endoscopic features were graded as major and minor. Subsequent to randomization and endoscopy, all patients received fluticasone and dexlansoprazole for 2 months. The primary study outcome was reduction in overall dysphagia score, assessed at 30 and 60 days post-intervention. Patients with severe strictures (less than 7-mm esophageal diameter) were excluded from the study. Thirty-one patients were randomized and completed the protocol: 17 randomized to dilation and 14 to no dilation. Both groups were similar with regard to gender, age, eosinophil density, endoscopic score, and baseline dysphagia score. The population exhibited moderate to severe dysphagia and moderate esophageal stricturing at baseline. Overall, there was a significant (P < 0.001) but similar reduction in mean dysphagia score at 30 and 60 days post-randomization compared with baseline in both groups. No significant difference in dysphagia scores between treatment groups after 30 (P = 0.93) or 60 (P = 0.21) days post-intervention was observed. Esophageal dilation did not result in additional improvement in dysphagia score compared with treatment with proton pump inhibitor and fluticasone alone. In patients with symptomatic esophageal eosinophilia without severe stricture, dilation does not appear to be a necessary initial treatment strategy.

Topics: Adult; Deglutition Disorders; Dexlansoprazole; Dilatation; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoplasty; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Male; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Single-Blind Method; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

It is unknown if successful control of esophageal inflammation in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) decreases the need for subsequent esophageal dilation. We aimed to determine whether histologic response to topical steroid treatment decreases the likelihood and frequency of subsequent esophageal dilation. We conducted a retrospective cohort study. Patients with an incident diagnosis of EoE were included if they had an initial esophageal dilation, received topical steroids, and had a subsequent endoscopy with biopsies. The number of dilations performed in each group was determined, and histologic responders (<15 eos/hpf) were compared to nonresponders. The 55 EoE patients included (27 responders and 28 nonresponders) underwent a mean of 3.0 dilations over a median follow-up of 19 months. Responders required fewer dilations than nonresponders (1.6 vs. 4.6, P = 0.03), after adjusting for potential confounders. Despite undergoing significantly fewer dilations, responders achieved a similar increase in esophageal diameter with dilation (4.9 vs. 5.0 mm; P = 0.92). In EoE patients undergoing esophageal dilation at baseline, control of inflammation with topical steroids was associated with a 65% decrease in the number of subsequent dilations to maintain the same esophageal caliber. This suggests that inflammation control is an important goal in patients with fibrostenotic changes of EoE.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Biopsy; Budesonide; Dilatation; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Young Adult

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been reported to be more prevalent in patients with esophageal atresia/tracheoesophageal fistula (EA-TEF). To date, there is limited data on the management of EoE in this group of patients. The aim of this study is to evaluate the treatment outcomes of EoE in children with EA-TEF. A retrospective chart review was performed on all EA-TEF children who were diagnosed with and treated for EoE between January 2000 and September 2013 at the Sydney Children's Hospital. Data collected included details of the patient's treatment, post-treatment endoscopy, symptoms and nutrition. Twenty patients were included in the study. Median age at diagnosis was 26 months (8-103 months), and median time from diagnosis to last follow-up was 23 months (2-132 months). Patients were treated with budesonide slurry, swallowed fluticasone, elimination diet alone or in combination. All patients were on proton pump inhibitors at time of diagnosis of EoE which was continued. Six out of seven patients who had furrowing/exudate in endoscopy at diagnosis had complete resolution at a median follow-up period of 26 months (P = 0.031). Median peak intraepithelial eosinophil count reduced significantly from 30/high-powered field (HPF) (19-80/HPF) to 8/HPF (0-85/HPF) (median time for improvement = 24 months) (P = 0.015). There was a significant reduction in symptoms of dysphagia and reflux post-treatment (P < 0.001). Prevalence of strictures significantly decreased (P = 0.016), as did need for dilatations (P = 0.004). In four out of six patients with gastrostomies at baseline, the feeding improved on treatment of EoE and the gastrostomy could be closed. There was also a nonsignificant trend towards improvement in weight and height 'z scores' of the patients. Treatment of EoE in children with EA-TEF was found to significantly reduce intraepithelial eosinophil count, symptoms, strictures and need for dilatations.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Administration, Topical; Budesonide; Child; Child, Preschool; Deglutition Disorders; Diet Therapy; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Atresia; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Female; Fluticasone; Gastroesophageal Reflux; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infant; Male; Retrospective Studies; Tracheoesophageal Fistula; Treatment Outcome

Although effective in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) in children, limited data exist on long-term safety and efficacy of swallowed topical corticosteroids. We investigated whether long-term use of swallowed fluticasone in children with EoE leads to sustained reduction in esophageal eosinophils, and endoscopic and clinical improvement.. In an open-label, prospective, single-center study, we offered pediatric patients with active EoE fluticasone 2 puffs to swallow twice a day (strengths in μg/puff: 2-4 years: 44, 5-11 years: 110, ≥12 years: 220). Clinical, endoscopic, and histological assessments were performed at baseline and shortly after therapy. If histological remission was seen, fluticasone was continued with clinical follow-ups every 4 months and endoscopic and histological follow-ups yearly. Clinical scores were derived from eight symptoms (abdominal pain, nausea, vomiting, regurgitation, chest pain, dysphagia, food impaction, and early satiety). Endoscopic scores were derived from six features (rings, exudates, furrows, edema, stricture, and shearing). Scores were expressed as ratio (features present/total). In addition to peak eosinophils/high power field (HPF) (primary outcome), histological features (eosinophilic microabscesses, degranulation, superficial layering, basal zone hyperplasia, dilated intercellular spaces, and lamina propria fibrosis) were assessed. Median clinical and endoscopic scores and individual histologic features were compared over 4 time intervals: <4 months, 4-12 months, 13-24 months, and >24 months. Growth and adverse effects were monitored.. We enrolled 54 patients, 80% male, median age 6.5 years (range 2-17 years), 85% atopic (57% asthma, 68% allergic rhinitis, and 31% atopic dermatitis), and 74% with food allergy. Mean follow-up was 20.4 months, the longest being 68 months (5.7 years). Esophageal eosinophil counts significantly decreased (median peak eosinophils/HPF at baseline 72, <4 months: 0.5, 4-12 months: 1.75, 13-24 months: 10, and >24 months: 12, all P<0.01). All histological features significantly decreased from baseline to all follow-up time points (all P<0.01). Lamina propria fibrosis significantly decreased (% patients with fibrosis at baseline 92, <4 months: 41, 4-12 months: 50, 13-24 months: 45, and >24 months: 39, all P<0.01). Endoscopic features improved (score at baseline 0.37, <4 months: 0.17, 4-12 months: 0.17, 13-24 months: 0, and >24 months: 0.1, all P<0.01, except at >24 months: P<0.05). Symptoms improved (score at baseline 0.22, <4 months: 0, 4-12 months: 0.11, 13-24 months: 0.11, and >24 months: 0.11, all P<0.05 except at >24 months: P=0.05). In a mixed linear regression model that accounts for correlation of repeated observations in the patient in a per-patient analysis, we found that treatment with swallowed fluticasone led to a statistically significant and sustained decrease in peak esophageal eosinophil counts. Asymptomatic esophageal candidiasis was seen in three children but resolved with anti-fungal therapy. Height and weight z-scores followed expected growth curves.. We demonstrate that swallowed fluticasone is effective as a long-term maintenance therapy for children with EoE, without growth impediment or serious side effects.

Topics: Abdominal Pain; Administration, Oral; Adolescent; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Chest Pain; Child; Child, Preschool; Deglutition Disorders; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Eosinophils; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagoscopy; Esophagus; Female; Fibrosis; Fluticasone; Humans; Maintenance Chemotherapy; Male; Mucous Membrane; Nausea; Prospective Studies; Remission Induction; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly recognized clinical entity. The optimal initial treatment strategy in adults with EoE remains controversial. The aim of this study was to employ a decision analysis model to determine the less costly option between the two most commonly employed treatment strategies in EoE. We constructed a model for an index case of a patient with biopsy-proven EoE who continues to be symptomatic despite proton-pump inhibitor therapy. The following treatment strategies were included: (i) swallowed fluticasone inhaler (followed by esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD] with dilation if ineffective); and (ii) EGD with dilation (followed by swallowed fluticasone inhaler if ineffective). The time horizon was 1 year. The model focused on cost analysis of initial treatment strategies. The perspective of the healthcare payer was used. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robustness of the model. For every patient whose symptoms improved or resolved with the strategy of fluticasone first followed by EGD, if necessary, it cost an average of $1078. Similarly, it cost an average of $1171 per patient if EGD with dilation was employed first. Sensitivity analyses indicated that initial treatment with fluticasone was the less costly strategy to improve dysphagia symptoms as long as the effectiveness of fluticasone remains at or above 0.62. Swallowed fluticasone inhaler (followed by EGD with dilation if necessary) is the more economical initial strategy when compared with EGD with dilation first.

Topics: Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Costs and Cost Analysis; Decision Trees; Deglutition Disorders; Dilatation; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Fluticasone; Hospitalization; Humans; Metered Dose Inhalers; Tennessee

Esophageal lichen planus (ELP) is a rare condition with unknown prevalence that can sometimes be underestimated due to the subtle and nonspecific findings of diagnostic workup. Oral lesions rarely extend to the esophageal mucosa, but when they do, the most frequent symptoms are dysphagia and odynophagia. There is often a significant delay in diagnosis and inadequate treatment. We report the case of a 59-year-old woman diagnosed with ELP, successfully treated with rituximab, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that depletes CD20+B cells. To our knowledge, this is only the second report of this treatment in ELP.

Topics: Alopecia; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived; Atrophy; Esophageal Diseases; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagitis, Peptic; Esophagus; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lichen Planus; Lichen Planus, Oral; Middle Aged; Mucous Membrane; Prednisone; Proton Pump Inhibitors; Rituximab; Salvage Therapy; T-Lymphocyte Subsets; Vulvar Lichen Sclerosus

Although the key features of eosinophilic esophagitis have been increasingly described over recent years, this entity is still often not considered and consequently diagnosis is often either not made or delayed. Typical endoscopic findings may be present. The diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis, however, relies on the histological assessment of mucosal biopsies. This case report highlights a common pattern of presentation of eosinophilic esophagitis and demonstrates the importance of considering this diagnosis.

Topics: Adolescent; Androstadienes; Anti-Inflammatory Agents; Anti-Ulcer Agents; Deglutition Disorders; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal; Eosinophilic Esophagitis; Esophageal Stenosis; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Omeprazole; Prednisolone

Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Administration, Oral; Aged; Androstadienes; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagitis, Peptic; Female; Fluticasone; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nebulizers and Vaporizers

We report a case of a 43 year old male patient, who was admitted with recurring esophageal bolus impactions. Since his childhood he has been complaining about dysphagia and was unable to swallow medication. He also complained about heartburn. The last esophageal bolus impaction was some weeks ago. After elimination of the bolus impaction with a rigid endoscope we found a high grade stenosis in the proximal esophagus that could not even be passed with a children's endoscope. An initial treatment of eosinophil esophagitis would be the therapy with a local corticoid for 6-9 month. In patients with typical rings or stenosis a dilation therapy might be necessary.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Androstadienes; Catheterization; Combined Modality Therapy; Deglutition Disorders; Diagnosis, Differential; Endoscopy, Digestive System; Eosinophilia; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Heartburn; Humans; Male; Prednisolone; Recurrence

We describe the first detailed case of eosinophilic esophagitis associated with esophageal intramural pseudodiverticulosis and gastro-esophageal reflux disease in a 24-year-old man, who suffered from recurrent dysphagia since the age of 3 years. He presented with symptoms of dysphagia, food impaction and malnutrition. An esophagogram revealed a high-grade stenosis in the proximal part of the esophagus. Histological evaluation of esophageal mucosal biopsies demonstrated more than 20 eosinophil granulocytes per high power field, indicative of eosinophilic esophagitis. Additionally, esophago-gastro-duodenoscopy showed pseudodiverticulosis in the distal portion of the esophagus. A therapeutic regimen consisting of topical steroid intake, antihistamines, proton-pump-inhibition and specific food avoidance led to significant clinical improvement within 6 weeks.

Topics: Administration, Topical; Adult; Androstadienes; Anti-Allergic Agents; Catheterization; Deglutition Disorders; Diverticulum, Esophageal; Eosinophilia; Esophageal Stenosis; Esophagitis; Fluticasone; Gastroscopy; Humans; Male; Manometry