fimasartan and Heart-Failure

Fimasartan (BR-A-657) is an angiotensin II receptor antagonist, recently approved as an antihypertensive agent.. This study aimed to investigate whether administration of fimasartan has an effect on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.. An open-label, two-period, two-treatment, single-sequence, crossover study was conducted in 14 healthy male volunteers. On the first day of each 7-day treatment period, subjects received a loading dose of digoxin 0.5 mg, either alone or together with fimasartan 240 mg in the morning, followed by an additional dose of digoxin 0.25 mg after 6 h. On the subsequent 6 days, digoxin 0.25 mg, either alone or with fimasartan 240 mg was administered once daily. Serial blood samples for pharmacokinetics were collected up to 24 h after the last administration in each period.. The geometric mean ratio and 90% confidence intervals (CI) for the Cmax,ss and AUCτ,ss of digoxin (with/without fimasartan) were 1.307 (1.123 - 1.520) and 1.087 (1.015 - 1.165), respectively. Study medications were well-tolerated without serious adverse events or clinically meaningful changes.. Coadministration of fimasartan with digoxin does not result in clinically significant changes of digoxin pharmacokinetics at steady-state in healthy subjects.

Topics: Adult; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Area Under Curve; Arrhythmias, Cardiac; Biphenyl Compounds; Cardiotonic Agents; Cross-Over Studies; Digoxin; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Pyrimidines; Tetrazoles; Young Adult

Fimasartan is the most recently developed, potent, and long-acting angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB). However, data are limited regarding treatment effects of fimasartan in patients with heart failure.. Between 2010 and 2016, patients who underwent coronary revascularization for myocardial infarction (MI) with heart failure and prescription of ARB at hospital discharge were enrolled from the Korean nationwide medical insurance data. Clinical outcomes were compared between patients receiving fimasartan and those receiving other ARBs (candesartan, valsartan, losartan, telmisartan, olmesartan, and irbesartan). The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke.. Of 2,802 eligible patients, fimasartan was prescribed to 124 patients (4.4%). During a median follow-up of 2.2 years (interquartile range, 1.0-3.9), 613 events of the primary outcome occurred. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between patients receiving fimasartan and those receiving other ARBs (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.46-1.45). Compared with patients receiving other ARBs, those receiving fimasartan had comparable incidence of all-cause death (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.30-1.63), recurrent MI (adjusted HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.49-3.34), hospitalization for heart failure (adjusted HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.27-1.84), and stroke (adjusted HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.18-1.96).. In this nationwide cohort, fimasartan, compared with other ARBs, had comparable treatment effects for a composite of all-cause death, recurrent MI, hospitalization for heart failure, and stroke in patients with heart failure after MI.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Heart Failure; Humans; Myocardial Infarction; Stroke; Treatment Outcome

Angiotensin II in the failing heart initially helps to maintain cardiac output and blood pressure, but ultimately accelerates its deterioration. In this study, we established a model of arrhythmia-induced heart failure (HF) in zebrafish and investigated the role of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) modulation by using an angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker, fimasartan, through the assessment of cellular and physiologic responses, morbidity, and mortality.. HF was induced in zebrafish larvae by exposure to 20 μM terfenadine. Morphologic, physiologic, and functional parameters were assessed in the presence or absence of fimasartan treatment.. Zebrafish exposed to terfenadine showed marked dilatation of the ventricle and reduced systolic function. Treatment with terfenadine was associated with 10-fold higher expression of atrial natriuretic peptide (p < 0.001 vs. vehicle), increased p53 mRNA expression, and chromatin fragmentation in the TUNEL assay, all of which were significantly reduced by fimasartan treatment. Moreover, fimasartan improved fractional shortening (terfenadine + fimasartan 16.9% ± 3.1% vs. terfenadine + vehicle 11.4% ± 5.6%, p < 0.05) and blood flow (terfenadine + fimasartan 479.1 ± 124.1 nL/sec vs. terfenadine + vehicle 273.0 ± 109.0 nL/sec, p < 0.05). Finally, treatment with fimasartan remarkably reduced mortality (terfenadine + fimasartan 36.0% vs. terfenadine + vehicle 96.0%, p < 0.001).. Fimasartan effectively protected against the progression of HF in zebrafish by improving hemodynamic indices, which improved survival. A reduction in apoptotic cell death and an improvement in hemodynamics may be the mechanisms behind these effects. Further human studies are warranted to evaluate the possible role of fimasartan in the treatment of HF.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Animals; Biphenyl Compounds; Heart Failure; Humans; Pyrimidines; Tetrazoles; Zebrafish