fidaxomicin and Neoplasms

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is a significant cause of healthcare-associated diarrhoea, and the emergence of endemic strains resulting in poorer outcomes is recognised worldwide. Patients with cancer are a specific high-risk group for development of infection. Areas covered: In this review, modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors for CDI in adult patients with haematological malignancy or solid tumours are evaluated. In particular, the contribution of antimicrobial exposure, hospitalisation and gastric acid suppression to risk of CDI are discussed. Recent advances in CDI treatment are outlined, namely faecal microbiota transplantation and fidaxomicin therapy for severe/refractory infection in cancer populations. Outcomes of CDI, including mortality are presented, together with the need for valid severity rating tools customised for cancer populations. Expert commentary: Future areas for research include the prognostic value of C. difficile colonisation in cancer patients and the potential impact of dedicated antimicrobial stewardship programs in reducing the burden of CDI in cancer units.

Topics: Adult; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Bacteriological Techniques; Clostridioides difficile; Drug Utilization; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Fecal Microbiota Transplantation; Fidaxomicin; Humans; Neoplasms; Risk Factors

Fidaxomicin is a macrocyclic antibiotic with proven efficacy against Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in adults. It was licensed in France in 2012, but, due to higher acquisition costs compared with existing treatments, healthcare providers require information on its cost/benefit profile.. To compare healthcare costs and health outcomes of fidaxomicin and vancomycin, as reference treatment for CDI.. A Markov model was used to simulate the treatment pathway, over 1 year, of adult patients with CDI receiving fidaxomicin or vancomycin. Several patient sub-groups (severe CDI; recurrent CDI; concomitant antibiotics; cancer; renal failure; elderly) were evaluated. Cost-effectiveness was analyzed based on cure and recurrence rates derived from published randomized clinical trials comparing fidaxomicin and vancomycin, and costs calculated from the payer perspective using French hospitalization data and drug cost databases. Model outputs included costs in euros (reference year 2014) and health outcomes (recurrence; sustained cure rates). Alternative scenario and sensitivity analyses were performed using data from other clinical trials in CDI, including one conducted in real-life clinical practice in France.. Drug acquisition costs were €1,692 higher in fidaxomicin-treated patients, but this was offset by the lower hospitalization costs with fidaxomicin, which were reduced by €1,722. The reduction in the cost of hospitalization was driven by the significantly lower number of recurrences in fidaxomicin-treated patients, offsetting the acquisition cost of fidaxomicin in all sub-groups except recurrent CDI and concomitant antibiotics.. This study demonstrated that, despite higher acquisition costs, the lower recurrence rate with fidaxomicin resulted in cost savings or low incremental costs compared with vancomycin.

Topics: Age Factors; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridium Infections; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Drug Costs; Fidaxomicin; France; Hospitalization; Humans; Markov Chains; Models, Economic; Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recurrence; Renal Insufficiency; Severity of Illness Index; Vancomycin

The objective of this paper was to assess the cost-utility of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in three specific CDI patient subgroups: those with cancer, treated with concomitant antibiotic therapy or with renal impairment. A Markov model with six health states was developed to assess the cost-utility of fidaxomicin versus vancomycin in the patient subgroups over a period of 1 year from initial infection. Cost and outcome data used to parameterise the model were taken from Spanish sources and published literature. The costs were from the Spanish hospital perspective, in Euros (€) and for 2013. For CDI patients with cancer, fidaxomicin was dominant versus vancomycin [gain of 0.016 quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and savings of €2,397 per patient]. At a cost-effectiveness threshold of €30,000 per QALY gained, the probability that fidaxomicin was cost-effective was 96 %. For CDI patients treated with concomitant antibiotic therapy, fidaxomicin was the dominant treatment versus vancomycin (gain of 0.014 QALYs and savings of €1,452 per patient), with a probability that fidaxomicin was cost-effective of 94 %. For CDI patients with renal impairment, fidaxomicin was also dominant versus vancomycin (gain of 0.013 QALYs and savings of €1,432 per patient), with a probability that fidaxomicin was cost-effective of 96 %. Over a 1-year time horizon, when fidaxomicin is compared to vancomycin in CDI patients with cancer, treated with concomitant antibiotic therapy or with renal impairment, the use of fidaxomicin would be expected to result in increased QALYs for patients and reduced overall costs.

Topics: Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Clostridioides difficile; Clostridium Infections; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Diarrhea; Fidaxomicin; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Neoplasms; Quality-Adjusted Life Years; Spain; Treatment Outcome; Vancomycin

To report our experience with the use of fidaxomicin (FDX), an oral macrocyclic antibiotic, in cancer patients with Clostridium difficile infection (CDI).. A single-center retrospective case series was conducted at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Patients with CDI treated with FDX from May 2011 to January 2013 were identified via the pharmacy database. Clinical response and recurrence after FDX initiation were evaluated.. Twenty-two patients were included, most of whom were male (55%) with a mean age of 58 years (range: 20-83 yrs). The most common underlying malignancies were nine patients with lymphoma (41%), seven with leukemia (32%), and six with solid tumors (27%). Indications for FDX included recurrent CDI in 16 patients (72%) and failure of both metronidazole and oral vancomycin in 6 patients (28%). Nineteen patients (86%) were on concomitant antimicrobials during CDI treatment. Clinical response to FDX was 91%, and overall sustained clinical response was 82%. FDX was well tolerated with no major adverse events that were FDX related or discontinuations due to drug-related adverse events.. In cancer patients, FDX is effective treatment for the first episode of CDI after failure of standard therapies and treatment of recurrent CDI. This was interesting given the large number of high-risk patients who continued to receive concomitant antimicrobial therapy, which is common in this immunocompromised patient population.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aminoglycosides; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cancer Care Facilities; Clostridioides difficile; Drug Prescriptions; Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial; Electronic Health Records; Enterocolitis, Pseudomembranous; Female; Fidaxomicin; Formularies, Hospital as Topic; Humans; Immunocompromised Host; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recurrence; Retrospective Studies; Texas; Young Adult