Page last updated: 2024-10-27

fenofibrate and Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined

fenofibrate has been researched along with Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined in 22 studies

Pharmavit: a polyvitamin product, comprising vitamins A, D2, B1, B2, B6, C, E, nicotinamide, & calcium pantothene; may be a promising agent for application to human populations exposed to carcinogenic and genetic hazards of ionizing radiation; RN from CHEMLINE

Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined: A type of familial lipid metabolism disorder characterized by a variable pattern of elevated plasma CHOLESTEROL and/or TRIGLYCERIDES. Multiple genes on different chromosomes may be involved, such as the major late transcription factor (UPSTREAM STIMULATORY FACTORS) on CHROMOSOME 1.

Research Excerpts

ExcerptRelevanceReference
"Fibrinogen in plasma was reduced from 3."5.29[The effect of micronized fenofibrate on lipid parameters and fibrinogen in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia]. ( Ceska, R; Haas, T; Kvasilová, M; Kvasnicka, J; Procházková, R; Sobra, J, 1996)
"Treatment with simvastatin was associated with significantly greater reduction of total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), while the decrease in triglycerides was significantly greater in patients receiving fenofibrate."2.71Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles. ( Chen, MF; Chen, WJ; Cheng, CC; Lee, YT; Lin, JW; Wang, TD, 2003)
"Fenofibrate, in contrast, was more effective on all triglyceride-rich lipoproteins in both the fasting and the postprandial state."2.71Chylomicron remnants of various sizes are lowered more effectively by fenofibrate than by atorvastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. ( Dierkes, J; Güttler, K; Luley, C; Westphal, S; Wiens, L, 2003)
"Atorvastatin was more efficient in the reduction of total cholesterol, whereas fenofibrate was more efficient in the reduction of triglycerides."2.70Comparison of the effects of atorvastatin or fenofibrate on nonlipid biochemical risk factors and the LDL particle size in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia. ( Ceska, R; Malik, J; Melenovsky, V; Pisarikova, A; Poledne, R; Simek, J; Skrha, J; Stavek, P; Wichterle, D, 2002)
"Simvastatin was associated with statistically significantly greater (p < or = 0."2.68Comparison of the efficacy of simvastatin and standard fibrate therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia. ( Baigts, F; Bruckert, E; De Gennes, JL; Malbecq, W, 1995)
" Discontinuation attributed to any adverse events (4."2.48Meta-analysis of safety of the coadministration of statin with fenofibrate in patients with combined hyperlipidemia. ( Ding, Z; Guo, J; Hou, R; Li, C; Ma, N; Meng, F; Qin, Y; Wang, H, 2012)
"Fibrinogen in plasma was reduced from 3."1.29[The effect of micronized fenofibrate on lipid parameters and fibrinogen in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia]. ( Ceska, R; Haas, T; Kvasilová, M; Kvasnicka, J; Procházková, R; Sobra, J, 1996)

Research

Studies (22)

TimeframeStudies, this research(%)All Research%
pre-19901 (4.55)18.7374
1990's5 (22.73)18.2507
2000's15 (68.18)29.6817
2010's1 (4.55)24.3611
2020's0 (0.00)2.80

Authors

AuthorsStudies
Arca, M2
Cambuli, VM1
Montali, A2
Sentinelli, F1
Filippi, E1
Campagna, F1
Quagliarini, F1
Antonini, R2
Romeo, S1
Baroni, MG1
Guo, J1
Meng, F1
Ma, N1
Li, C1
Ding, Z1
Wang, H1
Hou, R1
Qin, Y1
Melenovsky, V2
Malik, J2
Wichterle, D2
Simek, J2
Pisarikova, A1
Skrha, J1
Poledne, R1
Stavek, P1
Ceska, R3
Haas, T2
Malik, M1
Wang, TD1
Chen, WJ1
Lin, JW1
Cheng, CC1
Chen, MF1
Lee, YT1
Westphal, S1
Wiens, L1
Güttler, K1
Dierkes, J1
Luley, C1
Wierzbicki, AS1
Mikhailidis, DP2
Wray, R1
Ooi, TC1
Cousins, M1
Ooi, DS1
Nakajima, K1
Edwards, AL1
Grundy, SM1
Vega, GL1
Yuan, Z1
Battisti, WP1
Brady, WE1
Palmisano, J1
Koh, KK2
Quon, MJ2
Han, SH2
Chung, WJ2
Ahn, JY1
Seo, YH1
Choi, IS1
Shin, EK1
Yesilbursa, D1
Serdar, A1
Saltan, Y1
Serdar, Z1
Heper, Y1
Guclu, S1
Cordan, J1
Ribas, V1
Palomer, X1
Roglans, N1
Rotllan, N1
Fievet, C1
Tailleux, A1
Julve, J1
Laguna, JC1
Blanco-Vaca, F1
Escolà-Gil, JC1
McKenney, JM1
Farnier, M1
Lo, KW1
Bays, HE1
Perevozkaya, I1
Carlson, G1
Davies, MJ1
Mitchel, YB1
Gumbiner, B1
Christidis, DS1
Liberopoulos, EN1
Kakafika, AI1
Miltiadous, GA1
Cariolou, M1
Ganotakis, ES1
Elisaf, MS1
Natoli, S1
Micheletta, F1
Riggi, S1
Di Angelantonio, E1
Antonini, TM1
Diczfalusy, U1
Iuliano, L1
Rosenson, RS1
Bruckert, E2
De Gennes, JL1
Malbecq, W1
Baigts, F1
Guérin, M1
Dolphin, PJ1
Turpin, G1
Chapman, MJ1
Sobra, J1
Kvasnicka, J1
Procházková, R1
Kvasilová, M1
Perreault, S1
Hamilton, VH1
Lavoie, F1
Grover, S1
Ellen, RL1
McPherson, R1
Brown, WV1

Clinical Trials (3)

Trial Overview

TrialPhaseEnrollmentStudy TypeStart DateStatus
FEnofibRate as a Metabolic INtervention for Coronavirus Disease 2019[NCT04517396]Phase 2701 participants (Actual)Interventional2020-08-18Completed
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Tolerability and Efficacy of the Co-Administration of Simvastatin 20 mg/Day and Fenofibrate 160 mg/Day Compared to Simvastatin 20 mg/Day Alone for 12 Weeks of Treatment in Patie[NCT00092157]Phase 3571 participants (Actual)Interventional2002-05-01Completed
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Fenofibrate and Ezetimibe Coadministration in Patients With Mixed Hyperlipidemia[NCT00092573]Phase 3576 participants (Actual)Interventional2003-04-30Completed
[information is prepared from clinicaltrials.gov, extracted Sep-2024]

Trial Outcomes

All-Cause Death

Death from any cause during the observation period (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

InterventionParticipants (Count of Participants)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care19
Placebo + Usual Care22

Exploratory Hierarchical Composite Endpoint

The exploratory global rank score, or global severity score, is a nonparametric, hierarchically ranked outcome. The global rank score was generated by ranking all 701 participants on a scale of 1 to 701, from worst to best clinical outcomes. Participants were ranked by (1) time to death; (2) the number of days supported by invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); (3) The inspired concentration of oxygen/percent oxygen saturation (FiO2/SpO2) ratio area under the curve; (4) The number of days out of the hospital during the 30 day-period following randomization. (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care5.03
Placebo + Usual Care5.03

Number of Days Alive and Out of the Hospital During the 30 Days Following Randomization

Number of days that participants were alive and out of the hospital during the 30 days following randomization (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Interventiondays (Median)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care30
Placebo + Usual Care30

Number of Days Alive, Out of the Intensive Care Unit, Free of Mechanical Ventilation/Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation, or Maximal Available Respiratory Support in the 30 Days Following Randomization

Number of days participants were alive, out of the intensive care unit, free of mechanical ventilation/extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or maximal available respiratory support during the 30 days that followed randomization (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Interventiondays (Mean)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care28.8
Placebo + Usual Care28.3

Primary Hierarchical Composite Endpoint

The primary endpoint of the trial is a global rank score that ranks patient outcomes according to 5 factors. The global rank score, or global severity score, is a nonparametric, hierarchically ranked outcome. The global rank score was generated by ranking all 701 participants on a scale of 1 to 701, from worst to best clinical outcomes. Participants were ranked by (1) time to death; (2) the number of days supported by invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); (3) The inspired concentration of oxygen/percent oxygen saturation (FiO2/SpO2) ratio area under the curve; (4) For participants enrolled as outpatients who are subsequently hospitalized, the number of days out of the hospital during the 30 day-period following randomization; (5) For participants enrolled as outpatients who don't get hospitalized during the 30-day observation period, the modified Borg dyspnea scale (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: 30 days

InterventionRanked Severity Score (Median)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care5.32
Placebo + Usual Care5.33

Secondary Hierarchical Composite Endpoint

The secondary global rank score, or global severity score, is a nonparametric, hierarchically ranked outcome. The global rank score was generated by ranking all 701 participants on a scale of 1 to 701, from worst to best clinical outcomes. Participants were ranked by (1) time to death; (2) the number of days supported by invasive mechanical ventilation or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO); (3) The inspired concentration of oxygen/percent oxygen saturation (FiO2/SpO2) ratio area under the curve; (4) For participants enrolled as outpatients who are subsequently hospitalized, the number of days out of the hospital during the 30 day-period following randomization; (5) For participants enrolled as outpatients who don't get hospitalized during the 30-day observation period, a COVID-19 symptom scale rating fever, cough, dyspnea, muscle aches, sore throat, loss of smell or taste, headache, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea/vomiting, chest pain (each are rated from 0-10 then summed). (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: Up to 30 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care5.05
Placebo + Usual Care5.05

Seven-category Ordinal Scale

A seven-category ordinal scale consisting of the following categories: 1, not hospitalized with resumption of normal activities; 2, not hospitalized, but unable to resume normal activities; 3, hospitalized, not requiring supplemental oxygen; 4, hospitalized, requiring supplemental oxygen; 5, hospitalized, requiring nasal high-flow oxygen therapy, noninvasive mechanical ventilation, or both; 6, hospitalized, requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), invasive mechanical ventilation, or both; and 7, death. (NCT04517396)
Timeframe: At 15 days

Interventionscore on a scale (Median)
Fenofibrate + Usual Care1
Placebo + Usual Care1

Reviews

5 reviews available for fenofibrate and Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined

ArticleYear
Meta-analysis of safety of the coadministration of statin with fenofibrate in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2012, Nov-01, Volume: 110, Issue:9

    Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Cross-Over Studies; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedul

2012
Drug treatment of combined hyperlipidemia.
    American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions, 2001, Volume: 1, Issue:5

    Topics: Acute Disease; Clofibric Acid; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Female; Fenofibrate; Humans; Hydroxymethyl

2001
Vascular and metabolic effects of treatment of combined hyperlipidemia: focus on statins and fibrates.
    International journal of cardiology, 2008, Feb-29, Volume: 124, Issue:2

    Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endothelium,

2008
A head-to-head comparison of the cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates in different types of primary hyperlipidemia.
    Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 1997, Volume: 10, Issue:6

    Topics: Bezafibrate; Coronary Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fenofibrate; Gemf

1997
Long-term efficacy and safety of fenofibrate and a statin in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia.
    The American journal of cardiology, 1998, Feb-26, Volume: 81, Issue:4A

    Topics: Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Coronary Disease; Female; Fenofibrate; Humans; Hydroxymethylglut

1998

Trials

10 trials available for fenofibrate and Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined

ArticleYear
Comparison of the effects of atorvastatin or fenofibrate on nonlipid biochemical risk factors and the LDL particle size in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia.
    American heart journal, 2002, Volume: 144, Issue:4

    Topics: Apolipoproteins B; Atorvastatin; C-Reactive Protein; Cholesterol; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL

2002
Effect of atorvastatin and fenofibrate on autonomic tone in subjects with combined hyperlipidemia.
    The American journal of cardiology, 2003, Aug-01, Volume: 92, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Atorvastatin; Autonomic Nervous System; Baroreflex; Cross-Over Studies; Fenofibrate; Heart Ra

2003
Efficacy of fenofibrate and simvastatin on endothelial function and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia: relations with baseline lipid profiles.
    Atherosclerosis, 2003, Volume: 170, Issue:2

    Topics: C-Reactive Protein; CD40 Antigens; CD40 Ligand; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Endo

2003
Chylomicron remnants of various sizes are lowered more effectively by fenofibrate than by atorvastatin in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
    Atherosclerosis, 2003, Volume: 171, Issue:2

    Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Atorvastatin; Chylomicron Remnants; Chylomicrons; Cross-Over Studies; D

2003
Effectiveness and tolerability of simvastatin plus fenofibrate for combined hyperlipidemia (the SAFARI trial).
    The American journal of cardiology, 2005, Feb-15, Volume: 95, Issue:4

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Alanine Transaminase; Apolipoproteins; Aspartate Aminotransferases; Double-Blind Method

2005
Additive beneficial effects of fenofibrate combined with atorvastatin in the treatment of combined hyperlipidemia.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2005, May-17, Volume: 45, Issue:10

    Topics: Arteriosclerosis; Atorvastatin; Brachial Artery; Cross-Over Studies; Double-Blind Method; Drug Thera

2005
Safety and efficacy of long-term co-administration of fenofibrate and ezetimibe in patients with mixed hyperlipidemia.
    Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2006, Apr-18, Volume: 47, Issue:8

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Anticholesteremic Agents; Azetidines; Double-Blind Method; Drug Administration Schedule

2006
Increased plasma levels of oxysterols, in vivo markers of oxidative stress, in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia: reduction during atorvastatin and fenofibrate therapy.
    Free radical biology & medicine, 2007, Mar-01, Volume: 42, Issue:5

    Topics: Adult; alpha-Tocopherol; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; Drug Combinations; Female; Fenofibrate; Heptanoic

2007
Comparison of the efficacy of simvastatin and standard fibrate therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia.
    Clinical cardiology, 1995, Volume: 18, Issue:11

    Topics: Anticholesteremic Agents; Bezafibrate; Cholesterol, LDL; Clofibric Acid; Fatty Acids, Volatile; Fema

1995
A head-to-head comparison of the cost effectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates in different types of primary hyperlipidemia.
    Cardiovascular drugs and therapy, 1997, Volume: 10, Issue:6

    Topics: Bezafibrate; Coronary Disease; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Double-Blind Method; Female; Fenofibrate; Gemf

1997

Other Studies

8 other studies available for fenofibrate and Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined

ArticleYear
Serum adiponectin is decreased in patients with familial combined hyperlipidemia and normolipaemic relatives and is influenced by lipid-lowering treatment.
    Nutrition, metabolism, and cardiovascular diseases : NMCD, 2009, Volume: 19, Issue:9

    Topics: Adiponectin; Adult; Age Distribution; Atorvastatin; Biomarkers; Cholesterol, HDL; Family; Female; Fe

2009
Effect of fibrates on postprandial remnant-like particles in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
    Atherosclerosis, 2004, Volume: 172, Issue:2

    Topics: Cholesterol; Dietary Fats; Diterpenes; Fasting; Female; Fenofibrate; Gemfibrozil; Humans; Hyperlipid

2004
The effect of fenofibrate on serum paraoxonase activity and inflammatory markers in patients with combined hyperlipidemia.
    Kardiologia polska, 2005, Volume: 62, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Aryldialkylphosphatase; C-Reactive Protein; Coronary Artery Disease; Female; Fenofibrate; Fib

2005
Paradoxical exacerbation of combined hyperlipidemia in human apolipoprotein A-II transgenic mice treated with fenofibrate.
    Biochimica et biophysica acta, 2005, Dec-15, Volume: 1737, Issue:2-3

    Topics: Animals; Apolipoprotein A-II; Base Sequence; Cholesterol, HDL; Disease Models, Animal; Fenofibrate;

2005
The effect of apolipoprotein E polymorphism on the response to lipid-lowering treatment with atorvastatin or fenofibrate.
    Journal of cardiovascular pharmacology and therapeutics, 2006, Volume: 11, Issue:3

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Analysis of Variance; Apolipoprotein A-I; Apolipoproteins B; Apolipoproteins E; Atorvas

2006
Fenofibrate reduces plasma cholesteryl ester transfer from HDL to VLDL and normalizes the atherogenic, dense LDL profile in combined hyperlipidemia.
    Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology, 1996, Volume: 16, Issue:6

    Topics: Adult; Apolipoproteins B; Carrier Proteins; Cholesterol Ester Transfer Proteins; Cholesterol Esters;

1996
[The effect of micronized fenofibrate on lipid parameters and fibrinogen in heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia and familial combined hyperlipidemia].
    Casopis lekaru ceskych, 1996, Jul-26, Volume: 135, Issue:13

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Female; Fenofibrate; Fibrinogen; Heterozygote; Humans; Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combine

1996
Potential use of fenofibrate and other fibric acid derivatives in the clinic.
    The American journal of medicine, 1987, Nov-27, Volume: 83, Issue:5B

    Topics: Clofibrate; Fenofibrate; Humans; Hyperlipidemia, Familial Combined; Hyperlipoproteinemia Type II; Hy

1987