estrone-sulfate and Neoplasm-Metastasis

We conducted a pilot study assessing the effects of the selective estrogen receptor modulator, tamoxifen, on the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of the steroidal, irreversible aromatase inhibitor (AI), exemestane, when the two were coadministered in postmenopausal women with metastatic breast cancer.. Patients with documented or unknown hormone receptor sensitivity were eligible. Patients received oral exemestane at 25-mg once daily. Starting day 15, oral tamoxifen at 20-mg once daily, was added. We measured plasma concentrations of exemestane, estrone, estrone sulfate, and estradiol after 14 days of exemestane monotherapy and after approximately 4 weeks of combination therapy. The incidence and severity of adverse events were assessed by physical examination and patient reporting.. We treated 18 patients. All had received prior chemotherapy and/or hormonal therapy, eight and six, respectively, with single-agent selective estrogen receptor modulators or irreversible aromatase inhibitors; no hormonal therapy was given within 30 days of study entry. Plasma exemestane concentrations and estrone, estrone sulfate, and estradiol suppression were unchanged after approximately 4 weeks of tamoxifen coadministration. All drug-related adverse events were grades 1 or 2; none was unexpected. Although not a formal study end point, antitumor activity was noted, with two partial responses and four cases of stable disease among 17 evaluable patients after a 9-month median follow-up (range, 2.5-19 months).. This pilot study provides evidence that coadministration of tamoxifen does not affect exemestane pharmacokinetics or pharmacodynamics and that the combination is well-tolerated and active. Further clinical investigation is warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Estradiol; Estrone; Female; History, 18th Century; Humans; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Pilot Projects; Tamoxifen

Clinical and endocrinological effects of exemestane (6-methylenandrosta-1,4-diene-3,17-dione; PNU 155971) were evaluated in an open Phase I study. Thirteen postmenopausal women suffering from advanced breast cancer received exemestane in escalating doses over a 12-week period. Starting on 5 mg once daily (o.d.), exemestane was subsequently escalated at 2-week intervals to 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 mg o.d. Each patient subsequently continued treatment on the highest tolerated dose until time of progression. One patient terminated treatment after 6 days due to diarrhea that was probably not related to drug therapy, although a relationship could not be excluded. Apart from this, no serious side effects were seen during the dose escalation period. Exemestane (10 mg o.d.) caused maximal suppression of plasma estradiol (E2) and estrone (E1) to a mean of 14.6 and 5.8% of pretreatment levels, respectively, whereas 25 mg of exemestane o.d. suppressed estrone sulfate (E1S) to 8.9% of pretreatment levels. No fall in adrenal steroid levels was recorded. Exemestane (5 mg o.d.) suppressed urinary E2 and E1 to a mean of 11.9 and 12.2% of pretreatment levels, respectively. Administering exemestane at doses of 50-200 mg o.d. caused no further suppression of urinary E1, whereas urinary E2 fell to 6-7% of pretreatment levels. Median time to progression was 63 weeks. We conclude that exemestane is a well-tolerated aromatase inhibitor that effectively suppresses plasma and urinary estrogens in postmenopausal patients with breast cancer.

Topics: Aged; Alprostadil; Androgens; Androstadienes; Antineoplastic Agents; Aromatase Inhibitors; Breast Neoplasms; Dinoprostone; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Estradiol; Estrone; Female; Follicle Stimulating Hormone; Humans; Luteinizing Hormone; Lymphatic Metastasis; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Postmenopause

Multidrug resistance protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1) is an ATP-dependent efflux pump that can confer resistance to multiple anticancer drugs and transport conjugated organic anions. Unusually, transport of several MRP1 substrates requires glutathione (GSH). For example, estrone sulfate transport by MRP1 is stimulated by GSH, vincristine is co-transported with GSH, or GSH can be transported alone. In the present study, radioligand binding assays were developed to investigate the mechanistic details of GSH-stimulated transport of estrone sulfate by MRP1. We have established that estrone sulfate binding to MRP1 requires GSH, or its non-reducing analogue S-methyl GSH (S-mGSH), and further that the affinity (Kd) of MRP1 for estrone sulfate is 2.5-fold higher in the presence of S-mGSH than GSH itself. Association kinetics show that GSH binds to MRP1 first, and we propose that GSH binding induces a conformational change, which makes the estrone sulfate binding site accessible. Binding of non-hydrolyzable ATP analogues to MRP1 decreases the affinity for estrone sulfate. However, GSH (or S-mGSH) is still required for estrone sulfate binding, and the affinity for GSH is unchanged. Estrone sulfate affinity remains low following hydrolysis of ATP. The affinity for GSH also appears to decrease in the post-hydrolytic state. Our results indicate ATP binding is sufficient for reconfiguration of the estrone sulfate binding site to lower affinity and argue for the presence of a modulatory GSH binding site not associated with transport of this tripeptide. A model for the mechanism of GSH-stimulated estrone sulfate transport is proposed.

Topics: Binding Sites; Biological Transport; Cell Line, Tumor; Estrone; Glutathione; Humans; Hydrolysis; Kinetics; Models, Biological; Multidrug Resistance-Associated Proteins; Neoplasm Metastasis; Protein Binding; Vincristine