estramustine and Venous-Thrombosis

Combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP), a nornitrogen mustard-estrogen conjugate, are used to treat patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC). However, thromboembolic events (TE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and arterial thrombosis, are significant toxicities of these regimens. The current study sought to establish the rate of TE and to determine risk factors for TE.. A MEDLINE-based search identified EMP-based clinical trials published in the English-language peer-reviewed literature after 1990 in which > or = 20 patients with HRPC were enrolled and TE were clearly documented. Patient characteristics and the dose of EMP given were analyzed to determine their association with the rate of TE.. Twenty-three studies, enrolling a total of 896 patients, were included in the analysis. The overall risk of TE was 0.07 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.05-0.11). The risk of DVT was 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09). The risks of all other types of TE were <0.01. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, the dose of EMP administered, baseline patient age, and baseline prostate-specific antigen level were not found to be associated with the total risk of TE. The rates of total TE and DVT may be inflated because one of the analyzed studies initially had a very high rate of DVT (25%) when compared with the others.. The rate of TE in men with HRPC who are treated with EMP-based regimens is significant, but it does not appear to be related to the dose of EMP. Whether TE can be prevented with anticoagulant prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Carcinoma; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Docetaxel and estramustine exert anti-tumor effects by inhibiting microtubule function. In vitro data suggest synergism with this combination. This phase II study evaluated the response rate and toxicity of docetaxel and estramustine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC).. Patients were treated with docetaxel 35 mg/m(2) on day 2 and estramustine phosphate 280 mg p.o. tds days 1-3 weekly for 3 of 4 weeks, for a maximum of six treatment cycles.. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled between August 1999 and March 2001; 36 were eligible. Of 31 evaluable patients, responses were observed in 15 patients (47%); two patients (6%) obtained a complete response. Median time to treatment failure was 6 months; median survival was 1 year. Thromboembolic toxicity occurred in 11% of patients: three experienced deep venous thromboses and one had a fatal pulmonary embolism. Myelosuppression was minimal with this regimen.. Despite modest activity in metastatic breast cancer, the toxicity observed with the combination of estramustine and docetaxel precludes the routine use of this combination in the treatment of breast cancer. Further studies using this compound in metastatic breast cancer are not warranted.

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Breast Neoplasms; Docetaxel; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Female; Humans; Microtubules; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Paclitaxel; Survival; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

The combination of oral estramustine and oral etoposide has generated response rates of 40-50% in patients with hormone refractory prostate cancer in single institution trials. This study tested this regimen in a multi-institutional setting.. Fifty-five patients were accrued over a period of 4 months between 1 March 1996 and 1 July 1996. Two patients were not analyzable and two patients were ineligible. They were given an oral regimen consisting of estramustine 15 mg/kg/day (capped at 1120 mg per day) and etoposide 50 mg/M(2)/day, days 1-21 every 28 days. Patients received a median of two cycles of therapy.. Toxicities included 11 patients (20%) with grades 3 or 4 granulocytopenia, 5 patients (10%) with grades 3 or 4 edema, and 3 patients (6%) with a thrombotic event. There were two treatment-related deaths, one as a result of anemia and the other as a result of a myocardial infarction. Of the 32 men who received at least 2 cycles of therapy, 7 men (22%) demonstrated a partial response to this regimen as measured by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) criteria of a 50% decline from pretreatment values.. This trial demonstrates the toxicity of estramustine delivered in high dose. It also illustrates the difficulty of conducting phase II trials in prostate cancer in the cooperative group setting where the experience and comfort level of oncologists with new agents is less than that of the physicians at the institution where the therapy was developed. As the activity of this regimen with low-dose estramustine is defined, further multi-institutional studies may be warranted.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgens; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Agents, Phytogenic; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Etoposide; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Venous Thrombosis

Androgen-dependent and castration-resistant prostate cancer (PC) is usually sensitive to docetaxel chemotherapy. Nevertheless, docetaxel resistance frequently appears after several cycles of treatment, raising the problem of salvage treatment for docetaxel-resistant PC patients. Although the combination of docetaxel and estramustine prolongs metastasis-free and overall survival of patients with androgen-independent PC, the use of this modality remains limited in elderly patients or patients with several comorbidities, especially vascular disease or gastrointestinal toxicity, because of unacceptable toxicity including venous thrombosis. The aims of this study were therefore (i) to evaluate the in-vivo efficacy of estramustine combined with docetaxel since initial tumor growth and following the appearance of docetaxel resistance in the androgen-dependent human PC xenograft PAC120, and (ii) to evaluate the efficacy of estramustine in six human androgen-independent PC models derived from PAC120. In docetaxel-resistant tumor-bearing mice, estramustine alone induced a TGD2 of 18 days, whereas the combination of docetaxel and estramustine induced a TGD2 of 50 days (P<0.05) with no significantly different overall survival of mice treated by docetaxel and estramustine since day 1 or since the onset of resistance to docetaxel. Among the six human androgen-independent tumors treated with estramustine alone, two highly sensitive models, two intermediate responding tumors, and two resistant models were observed. Altogether, these results suggest that estramustine should be combined with docetaxel in PC patients, but the use of this treatment could be limited, particularly in elderly patients, to docetaxel-resistant cases.

Topics: Aged; Animals; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Comorbidity; Docetaxel; Drug Evaluation, Preclinical; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estramustine; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Humans; Male; Mice; Mice, Nude; Neoplasms, Hormone-Dependent; Orchiectomy; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Taxoids; Vascular Diseases; Venous Thrombosis; Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays