estramustine and Thromboembolism

What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? Estramustine phosphate has anti-tumour properties and it improves patient outcomes if combined with other chemotherapy agents such as docetaxel. The efficacy of estramustine phosphate in selected patients and its safety profile, provided used with any low-molecular-weight heparin support its use as a second-line treatment in hormone-resistant prostate cancer.. •  Estramustine phosphate is a nitrogen mustard derivative of estradiol-17β-phosphate and has anti-tumour properties. •  Interest in estramustine has been renewed because of the results of clinical studies showing improved patient outcomes if estramustine is combined with other chemotherapy agents such as docetaxel.. •  Relevant clinical studies using chemotherapy combinations including estramustine are discussed. •  Efficacy and safety outcomes are summarized.. •  Combination therapy with estramustine and docetaxel can increase PSA response rates, improve quality of life and increase median patient survival compared with chemotherapy regimens that do not include estramustine. •  Although the overall tolerability of estramustine is favourable, its use can be associated with an increased risk of thromboembolic events.. •  The identification of suitable patient groups and the effective management of the risk of thromboembolism with the adjunct of low-molecular-weight heparins support the use of estramustine as an effective second-line treatment strategy in hormone-resistant prostate cancer. •  These promising findings warrant further investigation in a randomized clinical trial.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Clinical Trials as Topic; Docetaxel; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Nausea; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Taxoids; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Vomiting

Combinations of cytotoxic chemotherapy with estramustine phosphate (EMP), a nornitrogen mustard-estrogen conjugate, are used to treat patients with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma (HRPC). However, thromboembolic events (TE), including deep venous thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism, stroke, myocardial infarction, and arterial thrombosis, are significant toxicities of these regimens. The current study sought to establish the rate of TE and to determine risk factors for TE.. A MEDLINE-based search identified EMP-based clinical trials published in the English-language peer-reviewed literature after 1990 in which > or = 20 patients with HRPC were enrolled and TE were clearly documented. Patient characteristics and the dose of EMP given were analyzed to determine their association with the rate of TE.. Twenty-three studies, enrolling a total of 896 patients, were included in the analysis. The overall risk of TE was 0.07 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.05-0.11). The risk of DVT was 0.06 (95% CI, 0.04-0.09). The risks of all other types of TE were <0.01. Using univariate logistic regression analysis, the dose of EMP administered, baseline patient age, and baseline prostate-specific antigen level were not found to be associated with the total risk of TE. The rates of total TE and DVT may be inflated because one of the analyzed studies initially had a very high rate of DVT (25%) when compared with the others.. The rate of TE in men with HRPC who are treated with EMP-based regimens is significant, but it does not appear to be related to the dose of EMP. Whether TE can be prevented with anticoagulant prophylaxis remains to be determined.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Carcinoma; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk Factors; Thromboembolism; Venous Thrombosis

Long-term androgen suppression plus radiotherapy (AS+RT) is standard treatment of high-risk prostate cancer. A randomized trial, Radiation Therapy Oncology Group trial 9902, was undertaken to determine whether adjuvant chemotherapy with paclitaxel, estramustine, and etoposide (TEE) plus AS+RT would improve disease outcomes with acceptable toxicity.. High-risk (prostate-specific antigen 20-100 ng/mL and Gleason score >or=7; or Stage T2 or greater, Gleason score 8, prostate-specific antigen level <100 ng/mL) nonmetastatic prostate cancer patients were randomized to AS+RT (Arm 1) vs. AS+RT plus four cycles of TEE (Arm 2). TEE was delivered 4 weeks after RT. AS continued for 2 years for both treatment arms. RT began after 8 weeks of AS began.. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 9902 trial opened January 11, 2000. Excess thromboembolic toxicity was noted, leading to study closure October 4, 2004. A total of 397 patients were accrued, and the data for 381 were analyzable. An acute and long-term toxicity analysis was performed. The worst overall toxicities during treatment were increased for Arm 2. Of the 192 patients, 136 (71%) on Arm 2 had RTOG Grade 3 or greater toxicity compared with 70 (37%) of 189 patients on Arm 1. Statistically significant increases in hematologic toxicity (p < 0.0001) and gastrointestinal toxicity (p = 0.017) but not genitourinary toxicity (p = 0.07) were noted during treatment. Two Grade 5 complications related to neutropenic infection occurred in Arm 2. Three cases of myelodysplasia/acute myelogenous leukemia were noted in Arm 2. At 2 and 3 years after therapy completion, excess long-term toxicity was not observed in Arm 2.. TEE was associated with significantly increased toxicity during treatment. The toxicity profiles did not differ at 2 and 3 years after therapy. Toxicity is an important consideration in the design of trials using adjuvant chemotherapy for prostate cancer.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Combined Modality Therapy; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Etoposide; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute; Male; Middle Aged; Myelodysplastic Syndromes; Paclitaxel; Prostatic Neoplasms; Thromboembolism

Docetaxel/estramustine is a known active regimen in hormonerefractory prostate cancer (HRPC). A phase II study was conducted to assess the safety and efficacy of docetaxel/estramustine combined with exisulind, an apoptotic antineoplastic drug.. Eighty men with chemotherapy-naive HRPC were enrolled in a multicenter, cooperative group study. The treatment regimen consisted of oral estramustine (280 mg 3 times daily for 5 days), docetaxel 70 mg/m2, oral exisulind (250 mg twice daily), oral dexamethasone (8 mg twice daily for 3 days), and oral warfarin (2 mg daily).. Seventy-five eligible patients were treated with a median of 6 cycles of therapy. Fortyseven patients (62.7%; 95% CI, 50.7%-73.6%) had a > or = 50% decline in prostate-specific antigen levels. Forty-six patients had measurable disease with 6 partial responses (13%; 95% CI, 4.9%-26.3%). The main grade 3/4 toxicities were neutrophils (79%), fatigue (15%), and thrombosis/embolism (10%). The median time to first progression was 5.1 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.3 months) and the median survival time was 17.8 months (95% CI, 14.7-20.1 months).. The combination of estramustine/docetaxel/exisulind was associated with significant thomboembolic toxicity despite prophylactic warfarin. The contribution of exisulind to toxicity is uncertain. Prostate-specific antigen decline, response rates, and progression-free and overall survival are similar to those reported with docetaxel/estramustine.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms; Sulindac; Survival Analysis; Taxoids; Thromboembolism

The purpose of The Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) 90203 trial is to determine which of 2 treatment strategies is superior in treating men with high-risk, clinically localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate (stage T1 to T3a NX M0), defined as a predicted probability < or =60% of remaining free from disease recurrence for 5 years after surgery. Patients with a > or =10-year life expectancy will be randomized to either radical prostatectomy (RP) alone versus estramustine and docetaxel before RP. Participants will be excluded if they have received prior therapy for prostate cancer (except transurethral resection of the prostate) or are judged not to be appropriate candidates for RP. Eligible patients will be stratified according to their predicted probability of remaining free from disease recurrence at 5 years after surgery (0% to 20%, 21% to 40%, and 41% to 60%) and randomized. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be 6 cycles (1 cycle = 21 days) of estramustine (280 mg tid, days 1 to 5) and docetaxel (70 mg/m2 on day 2). Warfarin (2 mg/day orally) will be given for prophylaxis against deep venous thrombosis. Bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection and RP will be performed within 60 days of registration/randomization for men randomized to the surgery-alone arm. For men randomized to receive preoperative chemotherapy, the surgical procedure will be performed within 60 days of completion of chemotherapy. Patients will be monitored with history review, physical examination, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels every 3 months for the first 3 years after surgery, every 6 months for the next 3 years, and annually thereafter. Biochemical disease recurrence will be defined as a serum PSA level >0.4 ng/mL on 2 consecutive occasions > or =3 months apart after RP. The time of biochemical failure is measured from the date of randomization to the time of the first PSA level <0.4 ng/mL that is confirmed on the second serial PSA. The primary study end point is to determine if early systemic treatment with neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP in patients with high-risk prostate cancer will decrease 5-year recurrence rates when compared with RP alone. Secondary outcomes will include (1) the safety and tolerability of neoadjuvant estramustine and docetaxel before RP; (2) the impact of this neoadjuvant strategy on pathologic tumor stage, including lymph node and surgical margin status; (3) time to clinically apparent disease recurrence; and (4) overall sur

Topics: Adenocarcinoma; Anticoagulants; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Estramustine; Feasibility Studies; Humans; Lymph Node Excision; Male; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Neoadjuvant Therapy; Patient Selection; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatectomy; Prostatic Neoplasms; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Risk; Taxoids; Thromboembolism; Treatment Outcome; Warfarin

The treatment of prostatic carcinoma with estrogens is associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular as well as thromboembolic complications. In the present study, patients harboring highly or moderately differentiated prostatic carcinoma without signs of metastases were treated with either polyestradiolphosphate + etinylestradiol, estramustine phosphate or given no treatment. Subsequently, these patients were investigated regarding factors (platelet aggregation, plasma and platelet phospholipid composition and lipoprotein patterns) that might contribute to increased thrombogenesis and cardiovascular risk. The results indicate the presence of increased in vitro platelet aggregation in patients treated with polyestradiolphosphate + etinylestradiol compared to those treated with estramustine phosphate or given no treatment. A possible relationship between the availability of arachidonic acid in platelet membrane phospholipids and in vitro platelet aggregation is suggested. On the other hand the alterations in plasma lipoproteins observed during treatment are generally considered positive from an atherogenic point of view and do not seem relevant to the elevated incidence of cardiovascular disease in these patients.

Topics: Aged; Apolipoproteins; Carcinoma; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cholesterol, HDL; Cholesterol, LDL; Drug Therapy, Combination; Estradiol; Estradiol Congeners; Estramustine; Ethinyl Estradiol; Fatty Acids; Humans; Lipoproteins; Male; Nitrogen Mustard Compounds; Platelet Aggregation; Prostatic Neoplasms; Risk; Thromboembolism; Triglycerides