estramustine and Prostatic-Neoplasms--Castration-Resistant

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of docetaxel, cabazitaxel, docetaxel + estramustine, mitoxantrone in the management of castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. Electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrance Library and Embase were searched for studies published from when the databases were established to January 1st, 2018. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared docetaxel + prednisone (DP), cabazitaxel + prednisone (CP), docetaxel + estramustine + prednisone (DEP), and mitoxantrone + cabazitaxel + prednisone (MP) for CRPC treatment were identified. The network meta-analysis was conducted with software R 3.3.2. We analyzed the main outcomes, including the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, tumor response and severe adverse events (AEs). Ranking of the chemotherapeutic agents was based on probabilities of interventions for each of the outcomes that were performed. The consistency of direct and indirect evidence was assessed by node splitting.. 10 RCTs, with 3590 patients, were analyzed. The network meta-analysis results revealed that CP significantly increased OS, PFS, PSA response, tumor response, and severe AEs compared to MP. DP showed similar results with CP except for tumor response, where it showed slight inferiority in effectiveness. DEP was associated with clearly improved outcomes in PFS, PSA response and tumor response compared to those of MP, but this was not the case for OS benefit and severe AEs. No significant difference was detected in DP, CP and DEP except for the outcomes of severe AEs. MP was less effective in survival and clinical benefit, but much safer in safety outcomes than other chemotherapy agents. The probabilities of rank plots showed that CP ranked first in OS and tumor response; DEP ranked first in PFS time and PSA response; MP was the best treatment mode for safety.. DP and CP survival benefit (OS, PFS) and clinical benefit (PSA response and tumor response) were comparable, as well as their associated AEs. DEP was associated with less survival benefit, similar clinical improvement and more AEs than DP or CP. MP had the lowest survival and clinical benefit but excellent safety than other agents. Based on evidences of current results, we recommended CP as the most suitable chemotherapy agent for CRPC patients, followed by DP, MP as third, and DEP as the last choice. However, considering limitations of our network meta-analysis, additional high-quality studies are needed for further evaluation.

Topics: Aged; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease-Free Survival; Docetaxel; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mitoxantrone; Network Meta-Analysis; Prednisone; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

Recently, increasing relevant studies researched the efficacy of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) patients using chemotherapy with or without estramustine, in order to assess the efficacy and toxicity of combining estramustine with chemotherapy for the treatment of CRPC.. Relevant randomized clinical trials were systematically searched from the databases Pubmed, Embase, and Web of science up to April 1, 2016. Data were centrally extracted and analyzed from the previous studies by 2 independent reviewers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) with pooled hazard ratios. Secondary endpoints were prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and grade 3 or 4 toxicity using pooled odds ratios. Stata version 12.0 software was used for statistical analysis.. Overall, this meta-analysis identified 9 eligible articles, including a total of 956 patients, who had been accrued between January 1, 1993 and December 1, 2010 and randomly divided into chemotherapy with estramustine and without estramustine. Chemotherapy (with or without estramustine) consisted of docetaxel, paclitaxel, ixabepilone, epirubicin, and vinblastine. Patients who received chemotherapy with estramustine had a better improvement in PSA response rate, comparing those without estramustine (OR = 1.84, 95% CI = 1.20-2.80). However, OS between the 2 groups indicated no significant differences (HR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.77-1.05). Besides, these results of meta-analysis showed no obvious differences between these 2 groups in grade 3 or 4 adverse effects, including anemia (OR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.38-1.57), neutropenia (OR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.59-1.43), thrombocytopenia (OR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.19-2.42), nausea (OR = 2.34, 95% CI = 0.81-6.72), vomiting (OR = 2.43, 95% CI = 0.69-8.51), diarrhea (OR = 3.45, 95% CI = 0.93-12.76), fatigue (OR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.32-1.41), neuropathy (OR = 0.54, 95% CI = 0.21-1.44), allergic reaction (OR = 1.60, 95% CI = 0.37-6.84), thromboembolic event (OR = 2.18, 95% CI = 0.86-5.51), and edema (OR = 1.02, 95% CI = 0.18-5.95).. This meta-analysis indicated chemotherapy with additional estramustine increased the PSA response rate. However, OS and grade 3 or 4 toxicity were not improved for these patients with CRPC.

Topics: Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Analysis

This multicenter phase 2 study assessed the combination of estramustine and weekly paclitaxel with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. We enrolled 77 patients who had received no prior chemotherapy for CRPC between 1998 and 2000; a total of 74 subjects were eligible for the study. Each 8-week cycle included paclitaxel 90 mg/m. Eligible patients received a median of 3 cycles (range, 1-10 cycles). The response rate among patients with measurable disease was 34% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19-52). The PSA response rate was 58% (95% CI, 47-70). Clinical benefit rate was 45% (95% CI, 33-57). The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI, 4.4-6.7). The median overall survival was 17.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-20.8). The most common clinical grade 3/4 toxicities were fatigue (14%) and sensory neuropathy (7%). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicities included lymphopenia (21%) and anemia (9%). There was one toxicity-related death. Quality-of-life scores improved by week 8, but the change was not statistically significant.. The combination has activity defined by PSA declines in CRPC but did not meet the protocol-specified end point for efficacy as defined by objective response rate. Since this study was conducted, more effective, better-tolerated regimens have been developed.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Paclitaxel; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Despite the favorable toxicity profile at the standard dose of 560 mg daily, the tolerability and toxicology of estramustine phosphate (EMP) have been a cause for concern at administration. Moreover, we do not know whether a lower dose of 280 mg of EMP daily can be administered with some efficacy and fewer side effects. The results of our phase II study suggest that low-dose EMP is a safe treatment option with the same efficacy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer.. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) in Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. The present study was a single-arm, nonrandomized prospective study in which all patients received EMP orally twice daily for a total dose of 280 mg/day. A total of 31 patients with CRPC were enrolled from December 2009 to December 2012 at 5 institutions in Japan. The primary endpoint was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response, defined as a 50% decline in the serum PSA level, confirmed ≥ 3 weeks later. The secondary endpoints included the objective response rate, interval to PSA progression, PSA response duration, progression-free survival, disease-specific survival, overall survival, safety, and quality-of-life assessment using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate scores.. Ten patients (32%) had a PSA response, and no patient had an objective response. The treatment was well tolerated, and the most frequent toxicities were grade 1 to 2 nausea/vomiting, anorexia, and gynecomastia. The median interval to PSA progression was 140 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 117-260 days). The PSA response duration was 119 days (95% CI, 49-219 days). The median progression-free survival was 213 days (95% CI, 167-422 days). The 3-year disease-specific survival and overall survival rates were 68.6% (median not reached; 95% CI, 33 months to not available) and 59.9% (median 42 months, 95% CI, 28 months to not available), respectively.. Low-dose EMP seems to be a safe treatment option with some efficacy in patients with CRPC.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Disease Progression; Estramustine; Humans; Kallikreins; Kaplan-Meier Estimate; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Quality of Life; Treatment Outcome

The aim of this phase 2 study was to evaluate the activity and tolerability of low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) with concomitant low-dose acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) as a thromboprophylactic agent in heavily pretreated patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer.. Patients received 420 mg of oral EMP twice daily and oral ASA 100 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen response. All of the patients had been previously treated with docetaxel and abiraterone acetate, and 12 had also received cabazitaxel.. Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Prostate-specific antigen response was observed in 9 patients (29.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14-48). Median progression-free survival was 3.6 months (95% CI, 2.2-5.6), and median overall survival was 7.6 months (95% CI, 6.9-9.7). Treatment was generally well tolerated, and no grade 3/4 toxicity was observed. Ten patients (32.2%) had grade 2 nausea and vomiting. No cardiovascular event and no major bleeding occurred. No venous thromboembolism event was observed.. Low-dose EMP with concomitant low-dose ASA seems to be a safe treatment option with some activity for patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer who have been heavily pretreated.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Aspirin; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

A low-dose chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel, estramustine and dexamethasone was investigated for its beneficial effect and feasibility in Japanese patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. Seventy-two Japanese patients with metastatic CRPC were enrolled to receive docetaxel (25 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 9), estramustine phosphate (280 mg orally twice daily from day 1 to day 3 and from day 8 to day 10) and dexamethasone (0.5 mg orally twice daily) every 21 days.. The median age of the patients was 72 years and 64 patients (89 %) had ≥grade 1 anemia at entry. The median total number of courses administered was 8.5 (range 1-93). Forty-two patients (58 %) had a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of ≥50 %. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 6 and 23 months, respectively. Fifteen patients (21 %) improved and 53 patients (74 %) were stable in their performance status. Of the 40 patients with bone pain, 25 patients (63 %) showed pain reduction. Among 71 patients assessable for their hemoglobin levels, 21 patients (30 %) achieved an increase of at least 1.0 g/dl. Of the 5 patients who terminated treatment because of ≥grade 3 toxicity, 4 patients had pneumonitis and one patient had anemia. Only one patient developed ≥grade 3 neutropenia.. The low-dose combination of docetaxel, estramustine and dexamethasone is active and tolerable with beneficial effects on serum PSA levels, performance status, anemia and bone pain in Japanese patients with CRPC. This regimen is a reasonable option for elderly patients with bone disease at risk of hematologic toxicity.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Dexamethasone; Docetaxel; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and toxicity of low-dose estramustine phosphate (EMP) monotherapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). We administered EMP at 140 or 280 mg/day to 89 patients between January 2003 and December 2012. None of the patients were receiving concomitant dexamethasone and none had ever been treated with docetaxel. Fifty-three patients (59.6%) experienced a decline in prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels, including 20 (22.5%) with a decline of more than 50%. The median time to PSA progression was 90 days. PSA-progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients treated with EMP 140 mg compared with patients treated with EMP 280 mg, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events between the two groups. The most frequent toxicities were nausea and anorexia. Two patients had grade 3 adverse events of pulmonary embolism and liver dysfunction. EMP treatment was discontinued in nine patients (10.1%) because of side effects (nausea and anorexia in 7, liver dysfunction and lacunar infarction in 1). Low-dose EMP monotherapy is well tolerated and can effectively reduce PSA levels.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Disease Progression; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Retrospective Studies; Treatment Outcome

Estracyt○R (estramustine phosphate) is a medical drug for prostate cancer with cytotoxic activity causing disruption of microtubule organization and indirect androgen production suppressing activity by its metabolite, estradiol. Based on the data obtained from the Estracyt○R Special Drug Use Investigation which surveyed the clinical efficacy and safety of Estracyt○R in patients with prostate cancer whose relapse of prostate cancer after combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy was confirmed, we evaluated the progression-free survival, prognostic factor, decrease in prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and safety. This surveillance was conducted at 147 institutions nationwide between October, 2010 and September, 2013 and clinical efficacy was evaluated in 239 cases and safety in 329 cases. The median duration of progression-free survival, PSA progression-free survival and PSA response were 169 days (95%CI, 142-190), 197 days (95%CI, 169-267) and 385 days, respectively. The decrease in PSA level was observed in 125 cases (52.3%). Rate of PSA decline ＞50 and ＞25% were 18.4 and 43.1, respectively, and rate of PSA best response (PSA decline ＞ 50%) was 32.6%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that long duration of prior CAB therapy, Estracyt○R - pretreatment PSA value and bone metastasis influenced progression-free survival significantly. Adverse events were observed in 127 cases (38.6%). The major adverse events were anorexia which was observed in 35 cases (10.9%), gastrointestinal disorders observed in 32 cases (9.7%), abnormal laboratory test values observed in 31 cases (9.4%) and gynecomastia observed in 16 cases (4.9%). These results suggest the clinical efficacy and safety of Estracyt○R for chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), and Estracyt○R is regarded as one of the treatment options for patients with CRPC, especially for patients who had long duration of prior CAB therapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Estramustine; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant

We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and safety profile of weekly low-dose docetaxel (DTX) with estramustine in comparison with triweekly standard-dose DTX treatment for Japanese patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. Between April 2002 and January 2011, 75 CRPC patients were treated with triweekly DTX (60-75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks) (standard-dose group), and 76 CRPC patients were treated with weekly low-dose DTX (20-30 mg/m(2) on days 2 and 9 with estramustine 560 mg on days 1-3 and 8-10) every 3 weeks (low-dose group). Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response and progression-free and overall survival were analyzed in each group.. Median serum PSA level of the standard-dose group and low-dose group was 25.0 and 35.5 ng/ml, respectively. In the standard-dose and low-dose groups, 57.8 and 65.2 % of patients, respectively, achieved a PSA decline ≥ 50 %. There was no significant difference in either median time to progression between the standard-dose group (10.0 months) and low-dose group (7.1 months) or in median duration of survival between the standard-dose group (24.2 months) and low-dose group (30.6 months). Multivariate analysis with a Cox proportional hazards regression model showed that DTX treatment protocol did not influence the risk of death. Incidences of grade 3-4 neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and thrombocytopenia were significantly higher in the standard-dose versus low-dose group (58.7 vs. 7.9 %, 16.0 vs. 3.9 %, and 8.0 vs. 0 %, respectively).. For Japanese CRPC patients, weekly low-dose DTX combined with estramustine has similar efficacy to standard-dose DTX but with fewer adverse events.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Estramustine; Humans; Japan; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Staging; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of tegafur-uracil (UFT) administration as a fourth-line therapy in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) who had already received combined androgen blockade (CAB) therapy (first-line), alternative antiandrogen therapy (second-line), and estramustine phosphate sodium hydrate (EMP) therapy (third-line), in order to determine who would benefit from UFT therapy.. UFT was administered at a daily dose of 300 mg/m(2) to 26 patients, and the response to UFT 4 weeks after its induction and its toxicity were evaluated.. A reduction in the serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value was observed in 12 patients (46.2 %), while two cases (7.7 %) achieved more than 50 % reduction in PSA. Two patients (7.7 %) required discontinuation of UFT administration because of side effects (grade 2 exanthema in one patient and grade 2 nausea in one patient). A PSA response to UFT was observed, especially in patients older than 75 years and/or whose Gleason score was 8 or less.. Our data indicate that UFT administration as a fourth-line therapy was tolerable and effective to some degree in patients with CRPC who had already received CAB therapy, alternative antiandrogen therapy, and EMP therapy. It can be used, even in patients aged more than 75 years old, without any loss of efficacy or effect on their activities of daily life, and can be regarded as a treatment option for patients with advanced prostate cancer.

Topics: Age Factors; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Androgen Antagonists; Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Disease Progression; Drug Combinations; Estramustine; Exanthema; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Nausea; Neoplasm Grading; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Tegafur; Uracil

To evaluate whether changes in fPSA level could predict tPSA flare-up in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.. We retrospectively identified 79 consecutive patients who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy at our institution. The treatment protocols included docetaxel 75 mg/m² every 21 days, with either prednisone 5 mg twice daily or estramustine 280 mg three times daily on days 1-5; treatment with dexamethasone preceded docetaxel therapy. All PSA values were determined before every cycle of docetaxel-based treatment.. According to changes in tPSA level, 79 patients were divided into 3 groups: response (group 1), progression (group 2) and flare-up (group 3). fPSA and tPSA levels showed different patterns in groups 1, 2 and 3. Changes in fPSA level were independent of the changes in tPSA level in group 3, which decreased during chemotherapy. However, comparing with fPSA changes in group 3, changes in fPSA level were in accordance with tPSA changes in groups 1 and 2. Estimated median survival in groups 1, 2 and 3 was 23, 13 and 21 months, respectively. Median survival for patients in groups 1 (P = 0.008 vs group 2) and 3 (P = 0.029 vs group 2) is significantly longer than for patients who experienced progressive disease under therapy. However, there was no statistically significant difference in survival between groups 1 and 3.. In the present study, we observed that changes in fPSA level could possibly discriminate tPSA flare-up from tPSA progression in patients with castration-refractory prostate cancer during the initial phase of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Disease Progression; Docetaxel; Estramustine; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisone; Prostate; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Retrospective Studies; Severity of Illness Index; Survival Analysis; Taxoids; Tumor Burden

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and toxicity of docetaxel-based chemotherapy, and to investigate pretreatment factors that can predict overall survival (OS) in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).. From June 2005 to July 2010, 70 patients with CRPC underwent docetaxel-based chemotherapy at Wakayama Medical University and related hospitals. Docetaxel was given at a dose of 70 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks or 35 mg/m(2) twice every 3 weeks. Oral estramustine 560 mg was given concurrently for five consecutive days during weeks 1 and 2 of each cycle, and prednisolone 10 mg was given every day. Dexamethasone 8 mg was premedicated intravenously before docetaxel administration.. The patients received a median of four cycles of treatment (range 1-31). In the serum prostate-specific antigen response, 13 (18.6%) patients achieved a complete response and 29 (41.4%) achieved a partial response. Median OS and time to progression were 14 months and 6 months, respectively. Median follow-up period was 9.5 months. Two independent pretreatment risk factors that predicted OS were visceral metastasis including lymph node metastasis and anemia. Grade 3/4 neutropenia and anemia occurred in 25.7 and 8.6% of the patients, respectively. Four treatment-related deaths were seen during the observation period.. The combination of docetaxel, estramustine and prednisolone was effective in Japanese patients with CRPC; however, this combination therapy should be carefully indicated to elderly and/or poor performance status patients due to its toxicity. Visceral metastasis and anemia were identified as independent risk factors which could predict OS.

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols; Docetaxel; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions; Estramustine; Humans; Lymphatic Metastasis; Male; Middle Aged; Prednisolone; Prostate-Specific Antigen; Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant; Taxoids; Treatment Outcome