er-086526 and Leiomyosarcoma

The heterogeneity of soft tissue sarcomas (STS) presents a formidable management challenge. Consequently, one of the main research goals is to define specific tailored therapy for each histological subtype and to develop a more personalised approach to treatment. The standard first line chemotherapy for advanced STS is doxorubicin, with or without ifosfamide, however, a number of different drugs are emerging as active therapies beyond first-line. Areas covered: Eribulin has recently been approved for advanced liposarcoma, after an anthracycline-containing regimen, demonstrating an overall survival (OS) advantage in liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma in a randomised Phase III clinical trial. In this manuscript, an overview of the efficacy and safety of eribulin in STS is presented, highlighting different clinical outcomes between histological subtypes and comparing data with other effective drugs used in the treatment of sarcomas. The potential mechanisms of action of eribulin are also described, including its activity as potent microtubule-destabilizing anticancer agent, which has other antitumor biological effects. Expert commentary: Eribulin is highly effective in some STS populations and also has an acceptable toxicity profile. Further studies are required to better understand the precise mechanism of action of this agent and potential role in combination schedules.

Topics: Animals; Antineoplastic Agents; Doxorubicin; Furans; Humans; Ifosfamide; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Survival Rate

Monotherapy with eribulin or gemcitabine has been found to be moderately effective in treating soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of eribulin-gemcitabine combination therapy for the two most common histologic types of STS, liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma.. In this nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II study, we included patients with progressive disease who had received one or two courses of chemotherapy that included doxorubicin. Patients were administered 1.4 mg/m2 eribulin and 1,000 mg/m2 gemcitabine on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival rate at 12 weeks (PFSR12wks), with null and alternative hypotheses of PFSR12wks ≤20.0% and ≥40.0%, respectively. Exploratory biomarker analyses with next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on pretreatment tumor samples.. Among the 37 patients included, the overall PFSR12wks was 73.0%, achieving the primary endpoint. The objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival, and median overall survival were 16.2%, 78.4%, 5.6 months, and 31.9 months, respectively, without differences according to histologic type. New safety signals and treatment-related deaths were not documented. NGS-based transcriptome analysis revealed that functional enrichment in the TGFβ pathway was mostly associated with a poor outcome, whereas single genetic alterations largely failed to predict treatment outcome.. Eribulin-gemcitabine combination therapy showed promising activity and an acceptable safety profile in patients with liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma. Gene expression profiling with pathway enrichment analysis would have possibilities to have predictive value for survival outcome, necessitating further investigation to confirm.

Topics: Deoxycytidine; Furans; Gemcitabine; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Treatment Outcome

Satisfactory treatment options for advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma are limited. The LEADER study (NCT03526679) investigated the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib plus eribulin.. LEADER is a multicenter phase Ib/II study for advanced leiomyosarcoma or liposarcoma. The phase Ib part enrolled 6 patients to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D) with the starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2 D1, D8 every 21 days. The primary endpoint of the phase II part was objective response rate (ORR) based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1, with phase Ib patients preplanned to be included in the efficacy analysis. Translational analyses were based on the transcriptomic data obtained from the NanoString nCounter platform.. Thirty patients were enrolled (leiomyosarcoma 21, liposarcoma 9); the median age was 59. One patient had to temporarily stop lenvatinib due to grade 2 arthritis in the first cycle, meeting DLT criteria. Four of 6 patients had to decrease the dose of lenvatinib to 14 mg between cycles two and three. RP2D was determined at lenvatinib 14 mg/day and eribulin 1.1 mg/m2. The confirmed ORR was 20%, and the ORR was not significantly different between phase Ib/II cohorts (P = 0.23). The median progression-free survival was 8.56 months (95% confidence interval, 4.40-not reached). Translational studies suggested increased dendritic cells in the tumor microenvironment (TME) after treatment.. Lenvatinib plus eribulin has a manageable safety profile and exhibits promising efficacy for treating advanced leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma.

Topics: Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Middle Aged; Tumor Microenvironment

This subgroup analysis of a phase 3 study compares outcomes for eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with leiomyosarcoma.. Patients ≥18 years old with advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma, ECOG PS ≤2, and ≥2 prior treatment regimens were randomly assigned (1:1) to eribulin mesylate (1.4 mg/m² intravenously on day 1 and day 8) or dacarbazine (either 850, 1000, or 1200 mg/m² intravenously) every 21 days until disease progression. The primary end point was OS; additional end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR).. 309 Patients with leiomyosarcoma were included (eribulin, n = 157; dacarbazine, n = 152). Median age was 57 years; 42% of patients had uterine disease and 57% had nonuterine disease. Median OS was 12.7 versus 13.0 months for eribulin versus dacarbazine, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.93 [95% CI 0.71-1.20]; P = 0.57). Median PFS (2.2 vs 2.6 months, HR = 1.07 [95% CI 0.84-1.38]; P = 0.58) and ORR (5% vs 7%) were similar between eribulin- and dacarbazine-treated patients. Grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 69% of patients receiving eribulin and 59% of patients receiving dacarbazine.. Efficacy of eribulin in patients with leiomyosarcoma was comparable to that of dacarbazine. Both agents had manageable safety profiles.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Dacarbazine; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies

Recent phase II and III clinical trials demonstrated anti-tumour activity of eribulin, a tubulin-interacting cytotoxic agent, in patients with metastatic soft tissue sarcoma (STS). In this exploratory study, we aimed to identify putative microRNA biomarkers that associate with eribulin sensitivity or resistance in STS.. Archival tumour tissue from primary tumours or metastatic lesions was collected prior to eribulin treatment, from 65 consenting patients involved in the EORTC trial 62052. This phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00413192) included multiple subtypes of STS. Tissue was available from 21 leiomyosarcomas, 14 adipocytic sarcomas, 9 synovial sarcomas and 21 other sarcoma histotypes. Total RNA was isolated from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumour samples and analysed using Taqman. The expression of 26 individual microRNAs (p < 0.05) differed significantly between non-responders and responders. Additional microRNAs of potential relevance were identified when considering the different histological subgroups.. The expression level of particular microRNAs in STS tissue samples may predict response to eribulin. Further validation studies as well as a preclinical assessment of the underlying molecular mechanisms are required.

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Disease-Free Survival; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Male; MicroRNAs; Middle Aged; Neoplasms, Connective and Soft Tissue; Sarcoma; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

A non-randomised, phase 2 study showed activity and tolerability of eribulin in advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma. In this phase 3 study, we aimed to compare overall survival in patients with advanced or metastatic soft-tissue sarcoma who received eribulin with that in patients who received dacarbazine (an active control).. We did this randomised, open-label, phase 3 study across 110 study sites in 22 countries. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with intermediate-grade or high-grade advanced liposarcoma or leiomyosarcoma who had received at least two previous systemic regimens for advanced disease (including an anthracycline). Using an interactive voice and web response system, an independent statistician randomly assigned (1:1) patients to receive eribulin mesilate (1·4 mg/m(2) intravenously on days 1 and 8) or dacarbazine (850 mg/m(2), 1000 mg/m(2), or 1200 mg/m(2) [dose dependent on centre and clinician] intravenously on day 1) every 21 days until disease progression. Randomisation was stratified by disease type, geographical region, and number of previous regimens for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma and in blocks of six. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01327885, and is closed to recruitment, but treatment and follow-up continue.. Between March 10, 2011 and May 22, 2013, we randomly assigned patients to eribulin (n=228) or dacarbazine (n=224). Overall survival was significantly improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to dacarbazine (median 13·5 months [95% CI 10·9-15·6] vs 11·5 months [9·6-13·0]; hazard ratio 0·77 [95% CI 0·62-0·95]; p=0·0169). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 224 (99%) of 226 patients who received eribulin and 218 (97%) of 224 who received dacarbazine. Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more common in patients who received eribulin (152 [67%]) than in those who received dacarbazine (126 [56%]), as were deaths (10 [4%] vs 3 [1%]); one death (in the eribulin group) was considered treatment-related by the investigators.. Overall survival was improved in patients assigned to eribulin compared with those assigned to an active control, suggesting that eribulin could be a treatment option for advanced soft-tissue sarcoma.. Eisai.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Antineoplastic Agents; Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating; Dacarbazine; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Grading; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Eribulin inhibits microtubule dynamics via a mechanism distinct from that of other tubulin-targeting drugs, inducing cell-cycle arrest and tumour regression in preclinical models. We assessed the activity and safety of eribulin in four strata of patients with different types of soft-tissue sarcoma.. In this non-randomised multicentre phase 2 study, patients were included if they had progressive or high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma and had received no more than one previous combination chemotherapy or up to two single drugs for advanced disease. They were stratified by the type of soft-tissue sarcoma they had. Eribulin was given intravenously at a concentration of 1·4 mg/m(2) over 2-5 min at days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks to primarily assess progression-free survival at 12 weeks (RECIST 1.0), which we evaluated in all patients who started treatment. Safety analyses were done in all patients who started treatment. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00413192.. Of 128 patients included, 37 had adipocytic sarcoma, 40 had leiomyosarcoma, 19 had synovial sarcoma, and 32 had other sarcomas. 12 (31·6%) of 38 patients with leiomyosarcoma evaluable for the primary endpoint, 15 (46·9%) of 32 patients with adipocytic sarcoma, four (21·1%) of 19 with synovial sarcoma, and five (19·2%) of 26 in other sarcomas were progression-free at 12 weeks. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (66 [52%] of 127 patients evaluable for safety), leucopenia (44 [35%]), anaemia (nine [7%]), fatigue (nine [7%]), febrile neutropenia (eight [6%]), abnormal alanine aminotransferase concentrations (six [5%]), mucositis (four [3%]), and sensory neuropathy (four [3%]).. Eribulin deserves further study in this setting, based on progression-free survival at 12 weeks in leiomyosarcoma and adipocytic sarcoma.. Eisai Limited, Hatfield, UK.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Antineoplastic Agents; Disease-Free Survival; Drug Administration Schedule; Europe; Female; Furans; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Male; Mesylates; Middle Aged; Sarcoma; Sarcoma, Synovial; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Survival Rate; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Soft tissue sarcomas are rare and heterogenous malignancies with a poor prognosis in advanced disease stages. Eribulin is used in metastatic liposarcoma (LPS) patients, who have failed first-line chemotherapy and has been approved for use in patients with LPS in the USA and Europe due to its efficacy in this histological subtype in a phase 3 trial. We have evaluated efficacy and tolerability of eribulin in LPS and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) patients in the routine clinical setting at our department.. In this retrospective single-center analysis, efficacy and safety of eribulin were retrospectively evaluated in advanced LPS and LMS patients at the Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna.. A total of 32 adult patients treated with eribulin were identified and included in this analysis. Overall response rate was 9.4% for all patients, with one patient with LPS and two patients with LMS showing a partial response. Disease control rate (partial response plus stable disease) for all patients was 50% (LPS: 47.1%; LMS 53.3%). No statistically significant difference in median progression-free survival and overall survival was detected between patients with LPS and LMS (p = 0.807 and p = 0.519, respectively). Patients with LMS (n = 2) had received fewer previous therapy lines than patients with LPS (n = 14) (≤ previous treatment lines, p < 0.001). Toxicity was generally manageable, and grade 3 + 4 events were rare.. The activity and tolerability of eribulin in LPS as in well in LMS patients in the routine clinical setting is comparable to outcomes reported in published phase 3 trials.

Topics: Adult; Humans; Leiomyosarcoma; Lipopolysaccharides; Liposarcoma; Retrospective Studies

Uterine leiomyosarcoma is an aggressive soft tissue tumor. Stathmin, a phosphoprotein that modulates microtubule dynamics, is highly expressed in many malignancies including leiomyosarcoma. The microtubule-depolymerizing agent eribulin has been recently approved for treating malignant soft tissue tumors. Although eribulin inhibits microtubule polymerization, little is known about the relationship between eribulin treatment and stathmin dynamics. In this study, we explored the role of stathmin expression in the action of eribulin in leiomyosarcoma cells. Eribulin induced phosphorylation of stathmin and reduced expression of subunits A and C of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in a leiomyosarcoma cell line. The PP2A activator FTY720 reduced levels of phosphorylated stathmin. Eribulin decreased stathmin protein levels without affecting stathmin mRNA expression. Furthermore, stathmin knockdown attenuated the inhibitory effects of eribulin on cell viability, whereas stathmin overexpression enhanced the anti-proliferative effect of eribulin. Eribulin-resistant leiomyosarcoma cell lines had enhanced expression of the class Ⅰ β-tubulin TUBB1, multi-drug resistance 1 protein MDR1 and breast cancer-resistance protein BCRP, and decreased expression of stathmin. Taken together, these results suggest that stathmin expression modulates the pharmacological efficacy of eribulin in uterine leiomyosarcoma cells.

Topics: ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily G, Member 2; Humans; Leiomyosarcoma; Microtubules; Neoplasm Proteins; Stathmin

Although the overall survival of advanced soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) patients has increased in recent years, the median progression-free survival is lower than 5 months, meaning that there is an unmet need in this population. Among second-line treatments for advanced STS, eribulin is an anti-microtubule agent that has been approved for liposarcoma. Here, we tested the combination of eribulin with gemcitabine in preclinical models of L-sarcoma. The effect in cell viability was measured by MTS and clonogenic assay. Cell cycle profiling was studied by flow cytometry, while apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry and Western blotting. The activity of eribulin plus gemcitabine was evaluated in in vivo patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. In L-sarcoma cell lines, eribulin plus gemcitabine showed to be synergistic, increasing the number of hypodiploid events (increased subG1 population) and the accumulation of DNA damage. In in vivo PDX models of L-sarcomas, eribulin combined with gemcitabine was a viable scheme, delaying tumour growth after one cycle of treatment, being more effective in leiomyosarcoma. The combination of eribulin and gemcitabine was synergistic in L-sarcoma cultures and it showed to be active in in vivo studies. This combination deserves further exploration in the clinical context.

Topics: Furans; Gemcitabine; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms

A randomized phase III study evaluated the efficacy of eribulin versus dacarbazine in patients with advanced liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma. Improved overall survival (OS) led to approval of eribulin for liposarcoma, but not for leiomyosarcoma.. We explored the molecular profile of 77 archival leiomyosarcoma samples from this trial to identify potential predictive biomarkers, utilizing low-coverage whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing. Tumor molecular profiles were correlated with clinical data, and disease control was defined as complete/partial response or stable disease (RECIST v1.1).. Overall, 111 focal copy-number alterations were observed in leiomyosarcoma. Gain of chromosome 17q12 was the most common event, present in 43 of 77 cases (56%). In the eribulin-treated group, gains of 4q26, 20p12.2, 13q13.3, 8q22.2, and 8q13.2 and loss of 1q44 had a negative impact on progression-free survival (PFS), while loss of 2p12 correlated with better prognosis. Gains of 4q22.1 and losses of 3q14.2, 2q14.1, and 11q25 had a negative impact on OS in patients with leiomyosarcoma receiving eribulin. The most commonly mutated genes were. Leiomyosarcoma has a complex genetic background, with multiple copy-number alterations and mutations affecting genes implicated in tumorigenesis. We identified several molecular changes with potential impact on survival of patients with leiomyosarcoma when treated with eribulin.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Biomarkers, Tumor; CA-125 Antigen; Carcinogenesis; Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17; Disease-Free Survival; DNA Copy Number Variations; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Male; Membrane Proteins; Middle Aged; Prognosis; Tumor Suppressor Protein p53; Whole Genome Sequencing; X-linked Nuclear Protein

Due to its low incidence, liposarcoma displays a limited number of therapeutic options. However, eribulin recently received approval for the treatment of advanced liposarcoma patients, progressing to at least two chemotherapy lines. We report herein the case of a man initially diagnosed with a leyomiosarcoma, subsequently reclassified as a dedifferentiated liposarcoma, who received eribulin after he failed several therapy lines. Eribulin provided our patient an 8-month disease control and a substantial clinical benefit with no relevant adverse effects, showing a good efficacy and safety profile despite its delayed employ. Additionally, this case strengthens the pivotal importance of molecular profiling in the management of soft tissue sarcomas.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biomarkers, Tumor; Delayed Diagnosis; Diagnostic Errors; Furans; Genetic Variation; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Male; Middle Aged; Retreatment; Time-to-Treatment; Tomography, X-Ray Computed

We report the case of a 51 year-old patient affected by an advanced uterine leiomyosarcoma treated with eribulin as fourth-line therapy. The patient, with a previous history of leiomyomas of the myometrium, had undergone total hysterectomy for repeated metrorrhagias. After 7 years, metastases in the liver, bone and lung were documented. A fine needle liver biopsy demonstrated leiomyosarcoma metastasis. The patient was treated with first-line doxorubicin chemotherapy; after six cycles, disease progression was observed. A second-line trabectedin chemotherapy and a third-line gemcitabine chemotherapy were performed; no objective responses were seen after two cycles. The patient was then treated with eribulin on the basis of an EORTC Phase II trial showing preliminary activity in uterine leiomyosarcoma. After six cycles, CT scan showed partial remission of liver lesion. Disease progression was observed after nine cycles with eribulin, without severe side effects and preserving a good quality of life.

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Biopsy; Bone Marrow; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Middle Aged; Neoplasm Metastasis; Neoplasm Staging; Tomography, X-Ray Computed; Treatment Outcome

Although eribulin is used to treat soft tissue sarcomas (STSs), treatment data for rare subtypes are limited. We conducted a post-marketing surveillance study to assess safety and efficacy of eribulin in STS patients stratified by subtype.. Japanese patients (n = 256) with advanced or metastatic STS receiving eribulin treatment were monitored for treatment status, adverse events, diagnostic imaging, and clinical outcomes at 3 months and 1 year. Interim analysis was performed. Patients will be monitored up to 2 years.. Interim analysis included 3-month (n = 255), imaging (n = 226), and 1-year (n = 105) data. STS subtype distribution was normal. Median number of eribulin cycles was 3.0 (range: 1-17 cycles). Among patients with imaging data, best overall tumor response (12 weeks) was partial response, 7.5% (n = 17); stable disease, 34.5% (n = 78); and stable disease ≥11 weeks, 10.2% (n = 23). Overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and clinical benefit rate (CBR) for all patients were 7.5%, 42.0% and 17.7%, respectively. ORR, DCR, and CBR were 10.3%, 32.0% and 16.5%, respectively, for patients with STS subtypes other than liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma and included responses from patients with rare STS subtypes. Adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred in 211 (82.7%) patients (42 [16.5%] patients had serious ADRs), and none led to death. ADRs leading to drug withdrawal and dose reduction occurred in 27 (10.6%) and 55 (21.6%) patients, respectively.. Eribulin was generally well tolerated and showed antitumor activity against STSs, including rare subtypes that currently have few treatment options.. NCT03058406 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Male; Middle Aged; Sarcoma; Soft Tissue Neoplasms; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult

Eribulin is a new drug to treat soft tissue sarcoma (STS) that exerts antitumor activity by binding to microtubules. The prognosis of STS is poor, and eribulin is expected to improve the treatment outcome. We observed several cases that exhibited resistance to eribulin and developed an eribulin-resistant leiomyosarcoma cell line to investigate the mechanism of resistance. The IC50 of eribulin was 125 times higher in the resistant cell line than in the parental cell line, and eribulin did not induce G2/M arrest in resistant cells. The resistant cell line showed increased expression of MDR1 transcript, but protein levels and functional analysis results were similar to the parental cell line. We found that class III

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Cell Line, Tumor; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Flow Cytometry; Furans; G2 Phase Cell Cycle Checkpoints; Humans; Immunohistochemistry; Inhibitory Concentration 50; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Tubulin

A middle-aged woman with a history of leiomyosarcoma of the uterus treated with surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy suffered a bulky metastatic recurrence 1 year later. She elected treatment with palliative eribulin, presenting with acute renal failure and electrolyte abnormalities consistent with tumour lysis syndrome on cycle 1 day 8. Despite aggressive supportive care and treatment including intravenous hydration, bicarbonate and rasburicase, she continued to decline, ultimately foregoing haemodialysis in favour of palliative care and passed away in the hospital.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Antimitotic Agents; Fatal Outcome; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liver Neoplasms; Middle Aged; Tumor Lysis Syndrome; Uterine Neoplasms

Topics: Antineoplastic Agents; Dacarbazine; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Male; Soft Tissue Neoplasms

Topics: Adipose Tissue; Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic; Drugs, Investigational; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Liposarcoma; Muscle, Smooth; Treatment Outcome

Uterine sarcomas are rare and comprise only 3% of all uterine cancers. Within the group of adult soft tissue sarcomas, they account for ∼7% of new cases. They consist of several distinct histological subtypes like leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal tumors, undifferentiated sarcomas, pure heterologous sarcomas, and mixed epithelial and mesenchymal tumors. Standard treatment in localized disease is abdominal hysterectomy. Bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and lymphadenectomy have no proven value in leiomyosarcomas and high-grade undifferentiated sarcomas. However, in endometrial stromal tumors, given the hormonal reponsiveness of most tumors, salpingo-oophorectomy is generally recommended. Carcinosarcomas are treated according to current recommendations for epithelial uterine cancers. In leiomyosarcomas, postoperative radiation does not improve both relapse-free and overall survival. adjuvant chemotherapy seems to improve survival in the context of uncontrolled phase II trials. However, it is currently not considered standard of care in the absence of data from randomized trials. In contrast, adjuvant chemotherapy does improve overall survival in carcinosarcomas and is therefore considered standard of care. Systemic therapy for advanced uterine leiomyosarcomas, undifferentiated uterine sarcomas, and heterologous sarcomas is generally following the recommendations for adult soft tissue sarcomas. Endometrial stromal sarcomas are usually hormonal receptor positive, which allows endocrine therapy in most cases.

Topics: Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Clinical Trials as Topic; Endometrial Stromal Tumors; Female; Furans; Humans; Ketones; Leiomyosarcoma; Neoplasm Staging; Sarcoma; Uterine Neoplasms