epoetin-alfa and Pain

To determine the cerebrospinal fluid concentrations and the functional and pain outcomes after a single intravenous infusion of erythropoietin at the start of a standard radiotherapy and steroid protocol.. Ten paraparetic patients with malignant extradural spinal cord compression who were eligible for radiotherapy, lumbar puncture and intravenous epoetin alpha were enrolled. The patients received epoetin alpha 1500 IU/kg intravenously over 30 min followed by a standardised dexamethasone and radiotherapy protocol. A lumbar puncture and venipuncture were carried out 24-30 h after the epoetin alpha infusion. The patients were followed closely at defined intervals.. Erythropoietin was detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid in all eight patients sampled (median 92.5 mIU/ml, range 17.8-214.0 mIU/ml). Before treatment, eight patients were non-ambulatory and two patients were ambulatory with assistance. After treatment, eight (80%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 44-97%) improved at least one functional class and recovered or maintained ambulation. Five of seven patients (71%; 95% CI 29-96%) with objective sensory deficits and one of seven (14%; 95% CI 0-58%) catheter-dependent patients recovered. Overall, 78% (95% CI 40-97%) had a pain response.. After an intravenous infusion of epoetin alpha, radiotherapy and steroids, high concentrations of erythropoietin were detectable in the cerebrospinal fluid. Patients with malignant extradural spinal cord compression showed encouraging improvements in neurological function and pain.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Combined Modality Therapy; Dexamethasone; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Glucocorticoids; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Palliative Care; Paraparesis; Recombinant Proteins; Spinal Cord Compression; Spinal Neoplasms; Survival Rate

Patients may complain of pain at the injection site after subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of erythropoietin (EPO). Local pain due to s.c. EPO into the thigh was evaluated in 60 hemodialysis patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Identical volumes and concentrations (2000 IU in 0.5 ml) of phosphate-buffered epoetin-alpha (EPO-alpha ph), citrate-buffered epoetin-alpha (EPO-alpha ci) and epoetin-beta (EPO-beta) were compared to 0.5 ml of 0.9% saline (SAL), used as placebo. The patients received the 4 injections at the same occasion. For pain evaluation, a verbal scale ranging from no pain (0) to extremely painful (5) and a 10 cm ungraduated visual analogue score (VAS) (0 = no pain, 10 = maximal pain) were used. Treatment acceptance was assessed (yes/no) and expressed as a percentage of the population. Ranking of the preparations from 1 to 4 according to increasing local discomfort was performed. Median verbal pain scores and interquartile ranges were 1.0 (0-2) for SAL, 0.0 (0-2) for EPO-beta, 1.5 (0-3) for EPO-alpha ph (p < or = 0.05 vs SAL and EPO-beta) and 3.0 (2-4) for EPO-alpha ci (p < or = 0.001 vs EPO-alpha ph). VAS was 0.9 (0.5-2.5) for SAL, 0.9 (0.4-2.4) for EPO-beta, 2.7 (0.8-5.7) for EPO-alpha ph (p < or = 0.001 vs SAL and EPO-beta) and 4.2 (1.7-6.4) for EPO-alpha ci (p < or = 0.001 vs EPO-alpha ph). Treatment acceptance was 73% for SAL, 78% for EPO-beta, 60% for EPO-alpha ph (p < or = 0.05 vs EPO-beta) and 32% for EPO-alpha ci (p < or = 0.05 vs EPO-alpha ph). Ranking was 2 (1-3) for SAL, 2 (1-2) for EPO-beta, 3 (1-4) for EPO-alpha ph (p < or = 0.05 vs SAL and EPO-beta) and 4 (3-4) for EPO-alpha ci (p < or = 0.05 vs SAL and EPO-beta) and 4 (3-4) for EPO-alpha ci (p < or = 0.001 vs EPO-alpha ph). In conclusion, s.c. EPO-alpha ph is better accepted than s.c. EPO-alpha ci. However, s.c. EPO-beta is less painful.

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Buffers; Citrates; Double-Blind Method; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Male; Pain; Pain Measurement; Patient Acceptance of Health Care; Phosphates; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis

Several studies have suggested that if recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously, a lower dose may be sufficient to maintain the hematocrit at a given level.. In a randomized, unblinded trial conducted at 24 hemodialysis units at Veterans Affairs medical centers, we assigned 208 patients who were receiving long-term hemodialysis and epoetin therapy to treatment with either subcutaneous or intravenous epoetin. The dose was initially reduced until the hematocrit was below 30 percent and then was gradually increased to a level that would maintain the hematocrit in the range of 30 to 33 percent for 26 weeks. We compared the average doses in the 26-week maintenance phase and the discomfort associated with the two routes of administration.. For the 107 patients treated by the subcutaneous route, the average weekly dose of epoetin during the maintenance phase was 32 percent less than that for the 101 patients treated by the intravenous route (mean [+/-SD], 95.1+/-75.0 vs. 140.3+/-88.5 U per kilogram of body weight per week; P<0.001). Only one patient in the subcutaneous-therapy group withdrew from the study because of pain at the injection site, and 86 percent rated the pain associated with subcutaneous administration as ranging from absent to mild.. In patients receiving hemodialysis, subcutaneous administration of epoetin can maintain the hematocrit in a desired target range, with an average weekly dose of epoetin that is lower than with intravenous administration.

Topics: Algorithms; Anemia; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Hematinics; Hematocrit; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Iron; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Pain; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis