epoetin-alfa has been researched along with Genital-Neoplasms--Female* in 7 studies
2 review(s) available for epoetin-alfa and Genital-Neoplasms--Female
Article | Year |
---|---|
The impact of anemia and its treatment on patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Anemia is a frequent complication of cancer and its treatment. It often impairs the functional status of patients and results in decreased functional capacity and quality of life. Its etiologies are multiple, including chronic inflammation, hemorrhage, nutritional deficiencies, hemolysis, bone marrow suppression by chemotherapy, or infiltration by tumor. It can manifest as feelings of weariness, tiredness, muscular weakness, dysphoric mood, somnolence, or impaired cognitive functioning. In gynecologic patients, the incidence of anemia has been reported to be as high as 80% depending on chemotherapy regimen. Given the various consequences of a low hemoglobin level, the importance of increasing or maintaining hemoglobin levels and ameliorating the symptoms is apparent. Clinical studies have demonstrated that the administration of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) is effective and safe in increasing hemoglobin levels and improving the overall quality of life in patients with gynecologic cancers undergoing chemotherapy. Therefore, epoetin alfa treatment should be considered in this patient population. Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Quality of Life; Recombinant Proteins | 2002 |
The Italian gynecological consensus statement on the use of epoetin alfa in the management of anemia.
A Consensus Conference on the use of recombinant human erythropoietin (rHuEPO, epoetin alfa) in gynecologic tumors was held in Rome in March 1999, and an associated consensus paper has been published in Italian. The current paper updates several discussions that took place at the 1999 meeting concerning epoetin alfa treatment in breast, ovarian, and cervical cancers; the role of epoetin alfa in mobilizing progenitor hematopoietic cells; administration of epoetin alfa in combination with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; and the effect of hemoglobin levels on outcome of radiation or chemoradiation treatment. Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Transfusion; Breast Neoplasms; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor; Hematinics; Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization; Hemoglobins; Humans; Ovarian Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Radiotherapy, Adjuvant; Recombinant Proteins; Uterine Cervical Neoplasms | 2002 |
2 trial(s) available for epoetin-alfa and Genital-Neoplasms--Female
Article | Year |
---|---|
A randomized comparison of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa and weekly epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia in patients with breast, lung, or gynecologic cancer.
An important clinical question is the relative efficacy of the most common dosages of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp; Amgen Inc.; Thousand Oaks, CA) 200 microg every 2 weeks (Q2W) and epoetin alfa (Procrit; Ortho Biotech Products, LP; Raritan, NJ) 40,000 U weekly (QW) for the treatment of chemotherapy-induced anemia. We designed three concurrent randomized, open-label, multicenter, identical trials (with the exception of tumor type criteria of breast, gynecologic, or lung cancer) of darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa in patients with chemotherapy-induced anemia to validate the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Anemia (PSQ-An) treatment tool and to compare the efficacies and safety profiles of these two agents. In each trial, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either darbepoetin alfa at a dose of 200 microg Q2W or epoetin alfa at a dose of 40,000 U QW for up to 16 weeks. The PSQ-An was assessed for validity, feasibility, and reliability. Secondary clinical endpoints were analyzed using the primary analysis set. Both individual trial analyses and a protocol-specified combined analysis of data from all three trials were conducted. Overall, 312 patients (157 darbepoetin alfa; 155 epoetin alfa) were randomized and received study drug. Baseline characteristics were similar in both treatment groups in each trial and overall. The PSQ-An was valid, feasible, and reliable. In general, no difference between treatment groups was observed for hemoglobin- and transfusion-based endpoints in each individual trial or in the combined analysis. From exploratory analyses, achievement and maintenance of a hemoglobin target range (11-13 g/dl) were similar in both groups. No differences in safety were observed. With the PSQ-An, formal comparisons of the impact of anemia therapies on patients and caregivers can be made in future prospective studies. Further, darbepoetin alfa (200 microg Q2W) and epoetin alfa (40,000 U QW) appear to achieve comparable clinical and hematologic outcomes. Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Darbepoetin alfa; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Epoetin Alfa; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Erythropoietin; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Quality of Life; Recombinant Proteins; Reproducibility of Results; Surveys and Questionnaires | 2004 |
Darbepoetin alfa administered every 2 weeks alleviates anemia in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy.
The objectives of this study were to assess the safety and efficacy of darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp) administered every 2 weeks in anemic patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy. This was an open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multicenter dose-finding study evaluating a range of every-2-week darbepoetin alfa doses. The active control arm received epoetin alfa (Epogen, Procrit) at 40,000 U weekly with a dose increase to 60,000 U weekly for subjects with an inadequate response. The lowest clinically effective doses of darbepoetin alfa in this study were 3.0 and 5.0 microg/kg every 2 weeks, with no additional benefit observed at higher doses. The percentage of patients who achieved a hematopoietic response in the 3.0- and 5.0-microg/kg groups was 66% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 46%-86%) and 84% (95% CI = 67%-100%), respectively, compared with 63% (95% CI = 46%-81%) in the epoetin alfa group. Darbepoetin alfa administered at a dose of 3.0 microg/kg every 2 weeks is safe and effective for treating anemia in patients with solid tumors on chemotherapy, and is comparable to epoetin alfa. A dose increase to 5.0 microg/kg of darbepoetin alfa administered every 2 weeks may be appropriate in patients with an inadequate initial response. Topics: Anemia; Breast Neoplasms; Darbepoetin alfa; Drug Administration Schedule; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Genital Neoplasms, Male; Humans; Lung Neoplasms; Male; Middle Aged; Neoplasms; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome | 2002 |
3 other study(ies) available for epoetin-alfa and Genital-Neoplasms--Female
Article | Year |
---|---|
Effectiveness of darbepoetin alfa versus epoetin alfa for the treatment of chemotherapy induced anemia in patients with gynecologic malignancies.
Chemotherapy induced anemia (CIA) commonly occurs in gynecologic oncology patients. This often leads to treatment with erythropoietic stimulating agents in order to prevent chemotherapy delays, dose modifications and transfusion of red blood cells. Our objective was to determine the subsequent transfusion rates following administration of either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa.. A single institution retrospective chart review was performed utilizing patients from January 2003 to September 2004 who received either darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa for CIA (Hgb < or = 10.0). Data collection variables included patient demographics, cancer diagnosis, chemotherapy treatment(s), laboratory data, erythropoeisis stimulation data, and transfusions. Sample size calculations were set to detect a 20% transfusion rate difference between the two groups. Chi-square, Fisher exact test and student t tests were used for statistical analysis.. 123 patients were eligible for analysis (60 darbepoetin alfa; 62 epoetin alfa). 93% of darbepoetin alfa patients received 200 mg every other week, while 86% of epoetin alfa patients received 40,000 U weekly. The darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa groups were similar in respect to age, race, tumor type, histology, previous chemotherapy, number of chemotherapy agents, weeks of erythropoietic stimulation, and baseline serum levels of creatinine and hemoglobin. The mean baseline Hgb and change in Hgb was similar for each group (darbepoetin alfa = 11.2, 2.5 and epoetin alfa = 11.3, 2.3). Twenty one (35%) of the darbepoetin alfa patients received a transfusion of packed red blood cells compared to 12 (19%) of epoetin alfa patients (p = 0.05).. This retrospective analysis powered to detect differences in transfusion rates revealed a statistically significant difference in transfusion rates between darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa for the treatment of CIA. These data warrant a randomized prospective trial in gynecologic oncology patients with careful attention to the timing of initiation of treatment, dosing regimens, and titration of growth factor. Topics: Anemia; Antineoplastic Agents; Blood Transfusion; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Middle Aged; Recombinant Proteins; Retrospective Studies | 2006 |
Validation of a patient satisfaction questionnaire for anemia treatment, the PSQ-An.
Treating anemia associated with chemotherapy and many cancers is often necessary. However, patient satisfaction with anemia treatment is limited by the lack of validated instruments. We developed and validated a new treatment-specific patient satisfaction instrument: the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire for Anemia Treatment (PSQ-An). Treatment burden and overall satisfaction scales were designed for ease of use in clinical practice.. 312 cancer patients (141 breast, 69 gynecological, and 102 non-small cell lung) were targeted to complete the PSQ-An at 4 week intervals. Data from weeks 5 and 9 were analyzed. Patients also completed the MOS SF-36 Global Health assessment and questions concerning resources devoted to anemia treatment. Item reduction used endorsement rates, floor/ceiling effects, and item-item correlations. Factor analysis identified meaningful subscales. Test-retest reliability was assessed. Construct validity was tested, using Pearson's correlations, by comparing subscale scores to Global Health, hemoglobin levels, and resources devoted to anemia treatment.. The overall response rate was 92.9% (264/284) at week 5. Most (84.2%) of the patients were female, and the mean (SD) age was 60.2 (+/- 11.8) years. Two distinct subscales were identified measuring treatment burden (7 items) and overall satisfaction (2 items). Test-retest reliability was examined (ICC: 0.45-0.67); both were internally consistent (alpha = 0.83). Both subscales exhibited convergent and divergent validity with independent measures of health. ANOVA results indicated that the PSQ-An Satisfaction subscale discriminated between 5 levels of MOS SF-36 Global Health (P = 0.006).. The PSQ-An is a validated, treatment-specific instrument for measuring satisfaction with anemia treatment for cancer patients. PSQ-An subscales reflect the burden of injection anemia treatment on cancer patients and their assessment of the overall treatment value. Topics: Aged; Anemia, Hemolytic; Antineoplastic Agents; Breast Neoplasms; Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Factor Analysis, Statistical; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hematinics; Humans; Karnofsky Performance Status; Male; Middle Aged; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Patient Satisfaction; Psychometrics; Quality of Life; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Surveys and Questionnaires | 2006 |
A novel method of preoperative autologous blood donation with a large volume of plasma for surgery in gynecologic malignancies.
The objective of this study was to establish a novel method of preoperative autologous blood donation (PAD) for surgery of gynecologic malignancies, which requires considerable amounts of plasma relative to the red blood cell component. To collect a double volume of plasma over the amount obtained from whole blood without using an aphaeresis system, we first collected 500 ml of whole blood (2.5 units), and centrifuged it. We gave back the resultant red cell component alone, and retained the plasma component. We further collected an additional 500 ml of whole blood, and centrifuged it. The red cell component (2.5 units) was stored in the refrigerator (as a concentrated red cell, CRC). The resultant plasma together with the plasma collected first (5 units) was frozen and stored in the freezer (fresh frozen plasma, FFP), We repeated this procedure at most three times at intervals of 1 week. Erythropoietin was injected once a week and iron tablets were prescribed. Ninety-nine patients undergoing surgery for a gynecological malignancy were subjected to this method and 86 patients without PAD served as a control. We conducted the procedure for PAD without any noticeable side effects. The amount of actual use of allogeneic CRC and FFP were significantly reduced in the PAD group compared with the control group. In particular, 93.6% of the PAD cases who gave 10 or less units of FFP could go without allogeneic FFP. Postoperative serum albumin levels were higher in the PAD group compared with the control. We have established a novel PAD method which can yield a greater volume of FFP relative to CRC, thus meeting requirements for surgery for gynecological malignancies. Topics: Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Specimen Collection; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Genital Neoplasms, Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Patient Selection; Plasma Volume; Preoperative Care; Recombinant Proteins | 2004 |