epoetin-alfa and Cross-Infection

epoetin-alfa has been researched along with Cross-Infection* in 5 studies

Trials

1 trial(s) available for epoetin-alfa and Cross-Infection

ArticleYear
Locking of tunneled hemodialysis catheters with gentamicin and heparin.
    Kidney international, 2004, Volume: 66, Issue:2

    Catheter-related infection (CRI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients receiving hemodialysis. Antibiotic locking of these catheters has been shown to increase both the success of systemic antibiotic treatment in line sepsis, and to reduce the incidence of sepsis. We have studied the use of gentamicin locking of catheters (in combination with standard heparin rather than previously reported citrate) to reduce CRI rates. Furthermore, we have investigated the effects of this strategy on epoetin requirements and vascular access function.. Fifty patients were studied. Patients were randomized to catheter-restricted filling with either standard heparin (5000 IU/mL) alone, or gentamicin and heparin (5 mg/mL). Epoetin requirements and hemoglobin response were monitored over the study period.. The gentamicin-locked group suffered only one infective episode (0.3/1000 catheter days) compared to 10 episodes in six patients in the heparin alone group (4/1000 catheter days, P= 0.02). The isolated organisms were equally split between Staphylococcal species and coliforms. There were no statistically significant differences in delivered dialysis dose (Kt/V) or QA between the two groups. Use of antibiotic locking was associated with both a higher mean hemoglobin (10.1 +/-0.14 g/dL vs. 9.2 +/- 0.17 g/dL in the heparin group, P= 0.003) and a lower mean epoetin dose (9000 +/- 734 IU/week vs. 10790 +/-615 IU/week in the heparin group, P= 0.04).. The practice of locking newly inserted tunneled central venous catheters with gentamicin and heparin is an effective strategy to reduce line sepsis rates, and is associated with beneficial effects on epoetin requirements.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Anemia; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Anticoagulants; Catheterization; Cross Infection; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Gentamicins; Hematinics; Heparin; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Sepsis

2004

Other Studies

4 other study(ies) available for epoetin-alfa and Cross-Infection

ArticleYear
Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections from contamination of epoetin alfa at a hemodialysis center.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2001, May-17, Volume: 344, Issue:20

    In a one month period, 10 Serratia liquefaciens bloodstream infections and 6 pyrogenic reactions occurred in outpatients at a hemodialysis center.. We performed a cohort study of all hemodialysis sessions on days that staff members reported S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions. We reviewed procedures and cultured samples of water, medications, soaps, and hand lotions and swabs from the hands of personnel.. We analyzed 208 sessions involving 48 patients. In 12 sessions, patients had S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections, and in 8, patients had pyrogenic reactions without bloodstream infection. Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with higher median doses of epoetin alfa than the 188 other sessions (6500 vs. 4000 U, P=0.03) and were more common during afternoon or evening shifts than morning shifts (P=0.03). Sessions with infections or reactions were associated with doses of epoetin alfa of more than 4000 U (multivariate odds ratio, 4.0; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.3 to 12.3). A review of procedures revealed that preservative-free, single-use vials of epoetin alfa were punctured multiple times, and residual epoetin alfa from multiple vials was pooled and administered to patients. S. liquefaciens was isolated from pooled epoetin alfa, empty vials of epoetin alfa that had been pooled, antibacterial soap, and hand lotion. All the isolates were identical by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. After the practice of pooling epoetin alfa was discontinued and the contaminated soap and lotion were replaced, no further S. liquefaciens bloodstream infections or pyrogenic reactions occurred at this hemodialysis facility.. Puncturing single-use vials multiple times and pooling preservative-free epoetin alfa caused this outbreak of bloodstream infections in a hemodialysis unit. To prevent similar outbreaks, medical personnel should follow the manufacturer's guidelines for the use of preservative-free medications.

    Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Bacteremia; Cohort Studies; Colorado; Cosmetics; Cross Infection; Data Collection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Contamination; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Fever; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Odds Ratio; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Serratia; Serratia Infections; Soaps; United States

2001
Lessons from an epidemic, again.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2001, May-17, Volume: 344, Issue:20

    Topics: Bacteremia; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Contamination; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Humans; Infection Control; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Serratia; Serratia Infections

2001
Serratia liquefaciens infections at a hemodialysis center.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2001, Sep-20, Volume: 345, Issue:12

    Topics: Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Contamination; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Humans; Medicare; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Serratia Infections; United States

2001
Serratia liquefaciens infections at a hemodialysis center.
    The New England journal of medicine, 2001, Sep-20, Volume: 345, Issue:12

    Topics: Ambulatory Care Facilities; Cross Infection; Disease Outbreaks; Drug Contamination; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Health Facilities, Proprietary; Humans; Medicare; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Serratia Infections; United States

2001