epoetin-alfa and Cardiovascular-Diseases

Continuous erythropoiesis receptor activator (CERA) is a newer, longer acting ESA which might be preferred to other ESAs (epoetin or darbepoetin) based on its lower frequency of administration. Different dosing requirements and molecular characteristics of CERA compared with other ESAs may lead to different health outcomes (mortality, cardiovascular events, quality of life) in people with anaemia and chronic kidney disease (CKD).. To assess benefits and harms of CERA compared with other epoetins (darbepoetin alfa and epoetin alfa or beta) or placebo/no treatment or CERA with differing strategy of administration for anaemia in individuals with CKD.. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register to 13 June 2017 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies contained in the Specialised Register are identified through search strategies specifically designed for CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE; handsearching conference proceedings; and searching the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of at least three months' duration, comparing CERA with a different ESA (darbepoetin alfa or epoetin alfa or beta) or placebo or standard care or versus CERA with different strategies for administration in people with any stage of CKD.. Data were extracted by two independent investigators. We summarised patient-centred outcomes (all-cause and cardiovascular mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, red cell blood transfusion, iron therapy, cancer, hypertension, seizures, dialysis vascular access thrombosis, drug injection-related events, hyperkalaemia and health-related quality of life and haemoglobin levels) using random effects meta-analysis. Treatment estimates were expressed as risk ratios (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CI) for dichotomous outcomes and mean differences or standardized mean difference with 95% CI for continuous outcomes.. We included 27 studies involving 5410 adults with CKD. Seven studies (1273 participants) involved people not requiring dialysis, 19 studies (4209 participants) involved people treated with dialysis and one study (71 participants) evaluated treatment in recipients of a kidney transplant. Treatment was given for 24 weeks on average. No data were available for children with CKD. Studies were generally at high or unclear risk of bias from allocation concealment and blinding of outcomes. Only two studies masked participants and investigators to treatment allocation. One study compared CERA with placebo, nine studies CERA with epoetin alfa or beta, nine studies CERA with darbepoetin alfa, and two studies compared CERA with epoetin alfa or beta and darbepoetin alfa. Three studies assessed the effects of differing frequencies of CERA administration and five assessed differing CERA doses.There was low certainty evidence that CERA had little or no effects on mortality (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.57; RR 1.11, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.65), major adverse cardiovascular events (RR 5.09, 95% CI 0.25 to 105.23; RR 5.56, 95% CI 0.99 to 31.30), hypertension (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.37; RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.79 to 1.28), need for blood transfusion (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.46; RR 0.94, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.61), or additional iron therapy (RR 1.03, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.15; RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.03) compared to epoetin alfa/beta or darbepoetin alfa respectively. There was insufficient evidence to compare the effect of CERA to placebo on clinical outcomes. Only one low quality study reported that CERA compared to placebo might lead to little or no difference in the risk of major cardiovascular events (RR 2.97, 95% CI 0.31 to 28.18) and hypertension ((RR 0.73, 95% CI 0.35 to 1.52). There was low certainty evidence that different doses (higher versus lower) or frequency (twice versus once monthly) of CERA administration had little or no different effect on all-cause mortality (RR 3.95, 95% CI 0.17 to 91.61; RR 0.97, 95% CI 0.56 to 1.66), hypertension (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.08 to 2.52; RR 0.85, 95% CI 0.60 to 1.21), and blood cell transfusions (RR 4.16, 95% CI 0.89 to 19.53; RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.51 to 1.62). No studies reported comparative treatment effects of different ESAs on health-related quality of life.. There is low certainty evidence that CERA has little or no effects on patient-centred outcomes compared with placebo, epoetin alfa or beta or darbepoetin alfa for adults with CKD. The effects of CERA among children who have CKD have not studied in RCTs.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythrocyte Transfusion; Erythropoietin; Humans; Hypertension; Middle Aged; Polyethylene Glycols; Publication Bias; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Thrombosis

Targeting higher hemoglobin levels with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) to treat the anemia of chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with increased cardiovascular risk.. Metaregression analysis examining the association of ESA dose with adverse outcomes independent of target or achieved hemoglobin level.. Patients with anemia of CKD irrespective of dialysis status.. We searched MEDLINE (inception to August 2010) and bibliographies of published meta-analyses and selected randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of ESAs for the treatment of anemia in adults with CKD, with a minimum 3-month duration. Two authors independently screened citations and extracted relevant data. Individual study arms were treated as cohorts and constituted the unit of analysis.. ESA dose standardized to a weekly epoetin alfa equivalent, and hemoglobin levels.. All-cause and cardiovascular mortality, cardiovascular events, kidney disease progression, or transfusion requirement.. 31 trials (12,956 patients) met the criteria. All-cause mortality was associated with higher (per epoetin alfa-equivalent 10,000-U/wk increment) first-3-month mean ESA dose (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 1.42; 95% CI, 1.10-1.83) and higher total-study-period mean ESA dose (IRR, 1.09; 95% CI, 1.02-1.18). First-3-month ESA dose remained significant after adjusting for first-3-month mean hemoglobin level (IRR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.02-2.14), as did total-study-period mean ESA dose adjusting for target hemoglobin level (IRR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.08-1.82). Parameter estimates between ESA dose and cardiovascular mortality were similar in magnitude and direction, but not statistically significant. Higher total-study-period mean ESA dose also was associated with increased rate of hypertension, stroke, and thrombotic events, including dialysis vascular access-related thrombotic events.. Use of study-level aggregated data; use of epoetin alfa-equivalent doses; lack of adjustment for confounders.. In patients with CKD, higher ESA dose might be associated with all-cause mortality and cardiovascular complications independent of hemoglobin level.

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Recombinant Proteins; Regression Analysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Treatment Outcome

The combination of diabetes and chronic kidney disease is associated with increased mortality and reduced quality of life. Recent studies have shown that, in general, late referral of patients to the renal unit increases mortality, and that patients with diabetes who are referred late have a particularly poor prognosis. Several co-morbid conditions have been shown to contribute to poor patient outcomes, including both cardiovascular disease and anaemia. In patients with diabetic nephropathy, anaemia is more severe and is seen earlier than in patients with non-diabetic renal disease. Although the treatment of anaemia with recombinant human erythropoietin (rhEPO; epoetin) is well established, the only data currently available concerning the effects of early intervention in patients with diabetic nephropathy are from small-scale studies. Therefore, two large-scale studies have been designed to provide information on the efficacy of epoetin treatment and on how current management strategies might be improved. The Anaemia CORrection in Diabetes (ACORD) study will provide information on the potential cardiac benefits of early anaemia management in patients with early, type 2 diabetic nephropathy. The Individualised Risk-profiling In DIabEtes Mellitus (IRIDIEM) study will provide evidence-based guidance in risk factor management, by assessing the efficacy of individualized interventions.

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Recombinant Proteins; Referral and Consultation; Survival Rate

Among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), the use of recombinant human erythropoietin and its derivatives for the treatment of anemia has been linked to a possibly increased risk of stroke, myocardial infarction, and other adverse events. Several trials have suggested that hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) prolyl hydroxylase inhibitors (PHIs) are as effective as erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) in increasing hemoglobin levels.. In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we assigned patients with CKD who were undergoing dialysis and who had a hemoglobin level of 8.0 to 11.5 g per deciliter to receive an oral HIF-PHI (daprodustat) or an injectable ESA (epoetin alfa if they were receiving hemodialysis or darbepoetin alfa if they were receiving peritoneal dialysis). The two primary outcomes were the mean change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 (noninferiority margin, -0.75 g per deciliter) and the first occurrence of a major adverse cardiovascular event (a composite of death from any cause, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke), with a noninferiority margin of 1.25.. A total of 2964 patients underwent randomization. The mean (±SD) baseline hemoglobin level was 10.4±1.0 g per deciliter overall. The mean (±SE) change in the hemoglobin level from baseline to weeks 28 through 52 was 0.28±0.02 g per deciliter in the daprodustat group and 0.10±0.02 g per deciliter in the ESA group (difference, 0.18 g per deciliter; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.12 to 0.24), which met the prespecified noninferiority margin of -0.75 g per deciliter. During a median follow-up of 2.5 years, a major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 374 of 1487 patients (25.2%) in the daprodustat group and in 394 of 1477 (26.7%) in the ESA group (hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.81 to 1.07), which also met the prespecified noninferiority margin for daprodustat. The percentages of patients with other adverse events were similar in the two groups.. Among patients with CKD undergoing dialysis, daprodustat was noninferior to ESAs regarding the change in the hemoglobin level from baseline and cardiovascular outcomes. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; ASCEND-D ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02879305.).

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Barbiturates; Cardiovascular Diseases; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Glycine; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Proline Dioxygenases; Intention to Treat Analysis; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Stroke

Randomized trials found that use of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to target normal hematocrit (Hct) levels (>39%) compared with 27%-34.5% increases cardiovascular risk and mortality among chronic kidney disease patients. However, the effects of the most widely used Hct target in the past 2 decades, 34.5%-39%, have never been examined.. To compare the effects of 2 Hct target strategies-30.0%-34.5% (low) and 34.5%-39.0% (mid) in a high-risk population: elderly dialysis patients with significant comorbidities.. Observational data from the US Renal Data System were used to emulate a randomized trial in which patients were assigned to either Hct strategy. Follow-up started after completing 3 months of hemodialysis and ended 6 months later. We conducted the observational analogs of intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Inverse-probability weighting was used to adjust for measured time-dependent confounding by indication.. A total of 22,474 elderly patients with both diabetes and cardiovascular disease who initiated hemodialysis in 2006-2008.. Hazard ratios (HRs) and survival probabilities for all-cause mortality and a composite cardiovascular and mortality endpoint.. The intention-to-treat HR (95% confidence interval) for mid versus low Hct strategy was 1.05 (0.99-1.11) for all-cause mortality and 1.03 (0.98-1.08) for the composite endpoint. The per-protocol HR (95% confidence interval) for mid versus low Hct strategy was 0.98 (0.78-1.24) for all-cause mortality and 1.00 (0.81-1.24) for the composite outcome.. Among hemodialysis patients, we did not find differences in 6-month survival or cardiovascular risk between clinical strategies that target Hct at 30.0%-34.5% versus 34.5%-39.0%.

Topics: Aged; Anemia, Iron-Deficiency; Cardiovascular Diseases; Comorbidity; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Dosage Calculations; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Hematinics; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Risk Factors; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome; United States

Anemia is a risk factor for death, adverse cardiovascular outcomes and poor quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Erythropoietin Stimulating Agents (ESA) are commonly used to increase hemoglobin levels in this population. In observational studies, higher hemoglobin levels (around 11-13 g/dL) are associated with improved survival and quality of life compared to hemoglobin levels around 9-10 g/dL. A systematic review of randomized trials found that targeting higher hemoglobin levels with ESA causes an increased risk of adverse vascular outcomes. It is possible, but has never been formally tested in a randomized trial, that ESA dose rather than targeted hemoglobin concentration itself mediates the increased risk of adverse vascular outcomes. The Clinical Evaluation of the DOSe of Erythropoietins (C.E. DOSE) trial will assess the benefits and harms of a high versus a low fixed ESA dose for the management of anemia in patients with end stage kidney disease.. This is a randomized, prospective open label blinded end-point (PROBE) trial due to enrol 2204 hemodialysis patients in Italy. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to 4000 IU/week versus 18000 IU/week of intravenous epoietin alfa or beta, or any other ESA in equivalent doses. The dose will be adjusted only if hemoglobin levels fall outside the 9.5-12.5 g/dL range. The primary outcome will be a composite of all-cause mortality, non fatal stroke, non fatal myocardial infarction and hospitalization for cardiovascular causes. Quality of life and costs will also be assessed.. The C.E.DOSE study will help inform the optimal therapeutic strategy for the management of anemia of hemodialysis patients, improving clinical outcomes, quality of life and costs, by ascertaining the potential benefits and harms of different fixed ESA doses.. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT00827021.

Topics: Adult; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cost-Benefit Analysis; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Health Care Costs; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Hospitalization; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Outcome Assessment, Health Care; Quality of Life; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis

Hypothesizing that statins may be useful as adjuvant treatment for renal anemia, we examined the association between statin prescription (Rx) and erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) hyporesponsiveness in Japanese hemodialysis (HD) patients prescribed ESAs.. We examined 3,602 patients in 60 HD facilities dialyzed 3 times/week for ≥4 months from the Japan Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study phases 3-5 (2005-2015). Statin Rx was reported at the end of a 4-month interval (baseline) for each patient. ESA hyporesponsiveness in the subsequent 4 months was then defined as a binary indicator (mean hemoglobin [Hgb] level <10 g/dL and mean ESA dose >6,000 units/week) and separately as the ESA resistance index (ERI; mean ESA dose/[dry weight × mean Hgb]). We used adjusted logistic and linear regressions to evaluate the associations between statin Rx and ESA hyporesponsiveness.. At baseline, 16.2% of patients reported statin Rx; 12.8% were classified as having ESA hyporesponsiveness during 4 months of follow-up. Compared to patients without statin Rx, patients with statin Rx had lower odds of ESA hyporesponsiveness (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.66-1.15). Similarly, the ERI was lower for those with statin Rx than without (ratio of means, 0.94; 95% CI 0.89-0.99) after adjustment for possible confounders.. Our results suggest that statins may slightly reduce ESA hyporesponsiveness in HD patients. However, any causal inference is limited by the observational study design and unmeasured compliance with statin Rx.

Topics: Aged; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant; Drug Resistance; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors; Japan; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Prospective Studies; Random Allocation; Renal Dialysis; Treatment Outcome

To evaluate the benefit/risk profile of epoetin α biosimilar with the erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) originators when administered to naïve patients from clinical practice.. Population-based observational cohort study.. All residents in the Lazio Region, Italy, with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or cancer retrieved from the Electronic Therapeutic Plan (ETP) Register for ESA between 2012 and 2014.. Overall, 13 470 incident ESA users were available for the analysis, 8161 in the CKD and 5309 in the oncology setting, respectively.. ESAs identified through the ATC B03XA were divided into 3 groups: (1) biosimilars; (2) epoetin α originator and (3) other originators. Patients were exposed to ESAs from the date of activation of the ETP, until the end of a 6-month follow-up period.. Effectiveness (all-cause mortality and blood transfusion) and safety (major cardiovascular events, blood dyscrasia). A composite outcome including all-cause mortality, blood transfusion and major cardiovascular events was predefined. HRs of any outcome were estimated through Cox regression.. We found no differences between patients on biosimilars or all originators with regard to the risk estimates of all-cause mortality, blood transfusion, major cardiovascular events and blood dyscrasia in the CKD setting. The composite outcome confirmed these results (biosimilars vs epoetin α originators: adjusted HR=1.02, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.33; biosimilars vs other originators: adjusted HR=1.09, 95% CI 0.85 to 1.41). Comparable risk estimates were observed between biosimilars and all originators in the oncology setting.. In both settings, our findings are suggestive of no difference between biosimilars and originators on relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes. This study may contribute to settling future drug policy for the health services and provides reassurance on the approval pathway for biosimilars. The oncology setting merits further research, taking into account tumour types, tumour stage and anticancer chemotherapy administered.

Topics: Anemia; Biosimilar Pharmaceuticals; Blood Transfusion; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoiesis; Female; Hematinics; Humans; Italy; Male; Neoplasms; Proportional Hazards Models; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Assessment; Treatment Outcome

Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) are commonly used to treat anemia in patients with CKD, including those receiving dialysis, although clinical trials have identified risks associated with ESA use. We evaluated the effects of changes in dialysis payment policies and product labeling instituted in 2011 on mortality and major cardiovascular events across the United States dialysis population in an open cohort study of patients on dialysis from January 1, 2005, through December 31, 2012, with Medicare as primary payer. We compared observed rates of death and major cardiovascular events in 2011 and 2012 with expected rates calculated on the basis of rates in 2005-2010, accounting for differences in patient characteristics and influenza virulence. An abrupt decline in erythropoietin dosing and hemoglobin concentration began in late 2010. Observed rates of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, and myocardial infarction in 2011 and 2012 were consistent with expected rates. During 2012, observed rates of stroke, venous thromboembolic disease (VTE), and heart failure were lower than expected (absolute deviation from trend per 100 patient-years [95% confidence interval]: -0.24 [-0.08 to -0.37] for stroke, -2.43 [-1.35 to -3.70] for VTE, and -0.77 [-0.28 to -1.27] for heart failure), although non-ESA-related changes in practice and Medicare payment penalties for rehospitalization may have confounded the results. This initial evidence suggests that action taken to mitigate risks associated with ESA use and changes in payment policy did not result in a relative increase in death or major cardiovascular events and may reflect improvements in stroke, VTE, and heart failure.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Cohort Studies; Drug Prescriptions; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Hematinics; Humans; Male; Medicare; Middle Aged; Practice Patterns, Physicians'; Reimbursement Mechanisms; Renal Dialysis; United States

Adequately powered studies directly comparing hard clinical outcomes of darbepoetin alfa (DPO) versus epoetin alfa (EPO) in patients undergoing dialysis are lacking.. Observational, registry-based, retrospective cohort study; we mimicked a cluster-randomized trial by comparing mortality and cardiovascular events in US patients initiating hemodialysis therapy in facilities (almost) exclusively using DPO versus EPO.. Nonchain US hemodialysis facilities; each facility switching from EPO to DPO (2003-2010) was matched for location, profit status, and facility type with one EPO facility. Patients subsequently initiating hemodialysis therapy in these facilities were assigned their facility-level exposure.. DPO versus EPO.. All-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality; composite of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), and nonfatal stroke.. Unadjusted and adjusted HRs from Cox proportional hazards regression models.. Of 508 dialysis facilities that switched to DPO, 492 were matched with a similar EPO facility; 19,932 (DPO: 9,465 [47.5%]; EPO: 10,467 [52.5%]) incident hemodialysis patients were followed up for 21,918 person-years during which 5,550 deaths occurred. Almost all baseline characteristics were tightly balanced. The demographics-adjusted mortality HR for DPO (vs EPO) was 1.06 (95% CI, 1.00-1.13) and was materially unchanged after adjustment for all other baseline characteristics (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.99-1.12). Cardiovascular mortality did not differ between groups (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.94-1.16). Nonfatal outcomes were evaluated among 9,455 patients with fee-for-service Medicare: 4,542 (48.0%) in DPO and 4,913 (52.0%) in EPO facilities. During 10,457 and 10,363 person-years, 248 and 372 events were recorded, respectively, for strokes and MIs. We found no differences in adjusted stroke or MI rates or their composite with cardiovascular death (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.96-1.25).. Nonrandom treatment assignment, potential residual confounding.. In incident hemodialysis patients, mortality and cardiovascular event rates did not differ between patients treated at facilities predominantly using DPO versus EPO.

Topics: Aged; Ambulatory Care Facilities; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Comorbidity; Darbepoetin alfa; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Hematinics; Hemodialysis Units, Hospital; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Proportional Hazards Models; Recombinant Proteins; Registries; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; Treatment Outcome; United States

Recombinant human erythropoietin (epoetin) is used routinely to increase blood hemoglobin levels in patients with ESRD and anemia. Although lower doses of epoetin are required to achieve equivalent hemoglobin responses when administered subcutaneously rather than intravenously, standard practice has been to administer epoetin to patients on hemodialysis intravenously. Randomized trials of alternative epoetin treatment regimens in patients with kidney failure have shown that risks of cardiovascular complications and death are related to the dose levels of epoetin used. Therefore, given the dose-sparing advantages of subcutaneous epoetin administration, the possibility that treatment of patients on hemodialysis with subcutaneous epoetin might be associated with more favorable outcomes compared with intravenous treatment was investigated.. A retrospective cohort study of 62,710 adult patients on hemodialysis treated with either intravenous or subcutaneous epoetin-α and enrolled in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ESRD Clinical Performance Measures Project from 1997 to 2005 was carried out. Risks of death and/or hospitalization for cardiovascular complications (adverse composite event outcomes) during 2 years of follow-up were determined in relationship to epoetin dose and route of administration (intravenous versus subcutaneous) by multivariate Cox proportional hazard modeling adjusted for demographics and clinical parameters.. Epoetin doses used to achieve equivalent hemoglobin responses in study patients were, on average, 25% higher when epoetin was administered intravenously rather than subcutaneously (as expected). Moreover, adverse composite event outcomes were found to be significantly more likely to occur during follow-up for patients on hemodialysis managed with intravenous rather than subcutaneous epoetin (adjusted hazard ratio for adverse events within 1 year [intravenous versus subcutaneous] was 1.11 [95% confidence interval, 1.04 to 1.18]).. This study finds that treatment of patients on hemodialysis with subcutaneous epoetin is associated with more favorable clinical outcomes than those associated with intravenous epoetin treatment.

Topics: Administration, Intravenous; Aged; Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Epoetin Alfa; Female; Heart Failure; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Hospitalization; Humans; Injections, Subcutaneous; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Renal Dialysis; Retrospective Studies; Stroke; United States

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Darbepoetin alfa; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobins; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Thromboembolism

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Heart Failure; Hemoglobins; Humans; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic

Topics: Anemia; Cardiovascular Diseases; Drug Industry; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hemoglobins; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 2-5 are known to suffer numerous complications and co-morbidities associated with kidney disease. The medication prescription patterns in this population are not well understood. We report on prescription data collected as part of a multicentre longitudinal study in patients with CKD, with a focus on medications with cardiovascular or cardioprotective effects.. Patients were recruited from four academic nephrology centres in the USA, with patient recruitment from June 2000 to March 2002. Medication data were captured at the time of first enrollment into the study. Individual medications were classified into medication groups, and those with predominant cardioprotective effects or for prevention of progression of kidney disease (e.g. medications for treatment of anaemia, lipid-lowering agents, antihypertensives, statins, etc.) were recorded for analysis. Descriptive statistics were used for medication prescription according to baseline demographics and co-morbidities. Predictors of epoetin and iron use were determined by logistic regression adjusting for age, race, sex, diabetes, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), haemoglobin and serum albumin.. Medication data were available for 619 patients with stages 2-5 CKD. Patients were 60.6+/-16.0 years of age, and were prescribed 8+/-4 (range 1-28) medications. Overall, the proportion of patients prescribed different classes of medications included epoetin (20%), intravenous iron (13%), HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (16%), angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors (44%), angiotensin receptor blockers (13%), beta-blockers (46%), calcium channel blockers (52%) and aspirin (37%). There was a low use of epoetin (45%) and iron (20%) in patients with anaemia. Only 24% of patients with coronary artery disease were prescribed statins, and ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers were used in only 58 and 23% of diabetic patients with proteinuria. Positive predictors of epoetin and iron therapy included white race and diabetes. Higher GFR and higher serum albumin were associated with lower odds of being prescribed epoetin. White race and diabetics were more likely to be prescribed iron.. This study provides an overview of prescription practices in a cohort of CKD patients. Substantial underutilization of certain classes of cardioprotective medications is apparent, and systematic educational efforts in this direction may well prove worthwhile to impact outcomes.

Topics: Aged; Cardiovascular Diseases; Chronic Disease; Drug Utilization; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Hematinics; Humans; Kidney Diseases; Logistic Models; Middle Aged; Recombinant Proteins

Topics: Adult; Cardiovascular Diseases; Decision Making; Disease Progression; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Glomerulosclerosis, Focal Segmental; Hematinics; Humans; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Kidney Transplantation; Morbidity; Neoplasms; Pregnancy; Pregnancy Complications; Recombinant Proteins; Renal Dialysis; Renal Replacement Therapy; Risk Assessment; Uremia