epoetin-alfa and Arthritis--Rheumatoid

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic and systemic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the small joints of the hands and feet. Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents have been used to treat anemia, one of the extra-articular manifestations of RA. Although anemia is less of a problem now because of the reduction in inflammation due to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs), it could still be an issue in countries where DMARDs are not yet accessible.. We assessed the clinical benefits and harms of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis.. We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library (issue 7 2012), Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid MEDLINE(R) In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations (1948 to 7 August 2012), OVID EMBASE (1980 to 7 August 2012), LILACS (1982 to 7 August 2012), the Clinical Trials Search Portal of the World Health Organization, reference lists of the retrieved publications and review articles. We did not apply any language restrictions.. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in patients aged 16 years or over, with a diagnosis of rheumatoid arthritis affected by anemia. We considered health-related quality of life, fatigue and safety as the primary outcomes.. Two authors independently performed trial selection, risk of bias assessment, and data extraction. We estimated difference in means with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for continuous outcomes. We estimated risk ratios with 95% CIs for binary outcomes.. We included three RCTs with a total of 133 participants. All trials compared human recombinant erythropoietin (EPO), for different durations (8, 12 and 52 weeks), versus placebo. All RCTs assessed health-related quality of life. All trials had high or unclear risk of bias for most domains, and were sponsored by the pharmaceutical industry. Two trials administered EPO by a subcutaneous route while the other used an intravenous route.We decided not to pool results from trials, due to inconsistencies in the reporting of results.Health-related quality of life: subcutaneous EPO - one trial with 70 patients at 52 weeks showed a statistically significant difference in improvement of patient global assessment (median and interquartile range 3.5 (1.0 to 6.0) compared with placebo 4.5 (2.0 to 7.5) (P = 0.027) on a VAS scale (0 to 10)). The other shorter term trials (12 weeks with subcutaneous EPO and eight weeks with intravenous administration) did not find statistically significant differences between treatment and control groups in health-related quality of life outcomes.Change in hemoglobin: both trials of subcutaneous EPO showed a statistically significant difference in increasing hemoglobin levels; (i) at 52 weeks (one trial, 70 patients), intervention hemoglobin level (median 134, interquartile range 110 to 158 g/litre) compared with the placebo group level (median 112, interquartile range; 86 to 128 g/litre) (P = 0.0001); (ii) at 12 weeks (one trial, 24 patients) compared with placebo (difference in means 8.00, 95% CI 7.43 to 8.57). Intravenous EPO at eight weeks showed no statistically significant difference in increasing hematocrit level for EPO versus placebo (difference in means 4.69, 95% CI -0.17 to 9.55; P = 0.06).Information on withdrawals due to adverse events was not reported in two trials, and one trial found no serious adverse events leading to withdrawals. None of the trials reported withdrawals due to high blood pressure, or to lack of efficacy or to fatigue.. We found conflicting evidence for erythropoiesis-stimulating agents to increase quality of life and hemoglobin level by treating anemia in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. However, this conclusion is based on randomized controlled trials with a high risk of bias, and relies on trials assessing human recombinant erythropoietin (EPO). The safety profile of EPO is unclear. Future trials assessing erythropoiesis-stimulating agents for anemia in rheumatoid arthritis should be conducted by independent researchers and reported according to the CONSORT statements. Trials should be based on Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) and The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI) approaches for combining both clinician and patient perspectives.

Topics: Anemia; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Hematinics; Hemoglobin A; Humans; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Recombinant Proteins

In patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery, the presence of anemia can preclude the donation of sufficient autologous blood (AB) to meet transfusion requirements. Although a number of studies have investigated the use of epoetin alfa (in conjunction with parenteral iron supplementation) to facilitate AB donation and reduce exposure to allogeneic blood in this patient population, the optimum treatment regimen and route of administration has yet to be defined. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with a low predonation hematocrit (Hct; < or = 39%), intravenous (i.v.) treatment with epoetin alfa 300 IU/kg twice weekly for 3 weeks was the optimum dosage for facilitation of AB donation and minimization of the decrease in Hct prior to elective orthopedic surgery. However, the subcutaneous (s.c.) route of epoetin alfa administration may allow lower dosages of epoetin alfa to be used. Indeed, epoetin alfa 100 IU/kg s.c. twice weekly for 3 weeks (in conjunction with a single i.v. bolus of 200 IU/ kg at the first s.c. dose) was as effective as 300 IU/kg i.v. administered according to the same schedule. The number of AB units collected, total red blood cell (RBC) volume donated, and peak proportion of reticulocytes were similar regardless of the route of administration. Both treatment groups were associated with a significant reduction in allogeneic blood exposure compared with historical controls. Findings consistent to all of these studies were that epoetin alfa was well tolerated, and that i.v. iron supplementation was necessary to maximize its beneficial effects.

Topics: Anemia; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Transfusion; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoiesis; Erythropoietin; Female; Ferric Compounds; Ferric Oxide, Saccharated; Glucaric Acid; Hematocrit; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Orthopedics; Premedication; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome

Preoperative epoetin-alpha administration is said to have a limited effect in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), due to lower iron availability. We studied the effects of preoperative epoetin-alpha treatment in orthopedic surgery patients in a daily life setting in which iron supplementation was assured, and compared the effects in RA and non-RA patients.. In an open, naturalistic, randomized controlled trial, 695 orthopedic surgery patients with preoperative hemoglobin (Hb) values of 10-13 g/dL, either with RA (113) or without RA (582), received either preoperative epoetin-alpha treatment added to standard care, or standard care alone. Hb values and transfusions were evaluated from entry into the study until 4-6 weeks after surgery.. Both in RA and non-RA patients, perioperative Hb values were significantly higher and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in epoetin-alpha treated patients than in control patients (p < 0.001). In RA patients, the outcomes regarding Hb values were not significantly or relevantly different from non-RA patients.. Just as with orthopedic patients in general, RA patients benefit from preoperative epoetin-alpha treatment in combination with iron supplementation. We postulate that iron supplementation during epoetin-alpha therapy in RA patients is important for optimal efficacy.

Topics: Aged; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip; Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee; Blood Loss, Surgical; Blood Transfusion; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoietin; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Hemoglobins; Humans; Iron; Male; Middle Aged; Postoperative Complications; Premedication; Recombinant Proteins; Spinal Diseases; Treatment Outcome

In patients scheduled for major orthopedic surgery, the presence of anemia can preclude the donation of sufficient autologous blood (AB) to meet transfusion requirements. Although a number of studies have investigated the use of epoetin alfa (in conjunction with parenteral iron supplementation) to facilitate AB donation and reduce exposure to allogeneic blood in this patient population, the optimum treatment regimen and route of administration has yet to be defined. In rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients with a low predonation hematocrit (Hct; < or = 39%), intravenous (i.v.) treatment with epoetin alfa 300 IU/kg twice weekly for 3 weeks was the optimum dosage for facilitation of AB donation and minimization of the decrease in Hct prior to elective orthopedic surgery. However, the subcutaneous (s.c.) route of epoetin alfa administration may allow lower dosages of epoetin alfa to be used. Indeed, epoetin alfa 100 IU/kg s.c. twice weekly for 3 weeks (in conjunction with a single i.v. bolus of 200 IU/ kg at the first s.c. dose) was as effective as 300 IU/kg i.v. administered according to the same schedule. The number of AB units collected, total red blood cell (RBC) volume donated, and peak proportion of reticulocytes were similar regardless of the route of administration. Both treatment groups were associated with a significant reduction in allogeneic blood exposure compared with historical controls. Findings consistent to all of these studies were that epoetin alfa was well tolerated, and that i.v. iron supplementation was necessary to maximize its beneficial effects.

Topics: Anemia; Arthritis, Rheumatoid; Blood Transfusion; Blood Transfusion, Autologous; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epoetin Alfa; Erythropoiesis; Erythropoietin; Female; Ferric Compounds; Ferric Oxide, Saccharated; Glucaric Acid; Hematocrit; Humans; Injections, Intravenous; Injections, Subcutaneous; Orthopedics; Premedication; Recombinant Proteins; Treatment Outcome