eplerenone and Hyperkalemia

Diabetic nephropathy (DN), which is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease, significantly elevates the morbidity and mortality of patients with diabetes. Recently, the benefits of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in chronic kidney disease (CKD), such as their anti-inflammatory and anti-fibrotic properties, have been discovered. Thus, the present meta-analysis aimed to systematically assess the efficacy and safety of eplerenone treatment in patients with DN. Six electronic databases-PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI (China National Knowledge Infrastructure), and CBM(Chinese BioMedical Literature Database)-were searched to retrieve randomized controlled trials that assessed eplerenone treatment in patients with DN and were published up to July 31, 2021. Eight randomized controlled trials involving 838 patients were included. Between the eplerenone treatment groups and controls, significant differences were identified in 24-h urine protein levels (mean difference [MD], -19.63 [95% CI, -23.73 to -15.53], P < 0.00001), microalbuminuria (MD, -7.75 [95% CI, -9.75 to -5.75], P < 0.00001), urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (MD, -48.29 [95% CI, -64.45 to -32.14], P < 0.00001), systolic blood pressure (SBP) (MD, -2.49 [95% CI, -4.48 to -0.50], P = 0.01), serum potassium levels (MD, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.24], P < 0.00001), and levels of the renal fibrosis indicator laminin (MD, -8.84 [95% CI, -11.93 to -5.75], P < 0.00001). However, for the effect of estimated glomerular filtration rate (MD, 1.74 [95% CI, -0.87 to 4.35], P = 0.19) and diastolic blood pressure (MD, -0.51 [95% CI, -1.58 to 0.57], P = 0.36), the differences between the two groups were not significant. In addition, no noticeable difference was identified in the adverse events of hyperkalemia and cough between them. These findings suggest that eplerenone exerts beneficial effects on DN by significantly reducing urinary albumin or protein excretion, SBP, and laminin levels, without increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and other adverse events.

Topics: Albumins; Diabetes Mellitus; Diabetic Nephropathies; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Laminin; Male; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) represents a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects with diabetes and develops in more than one third of diabetic patients. Steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs - eplerenone and spironolactone) reduce mortality in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, in clinical practice the use of steroidal MRAs is limited by the significant risk of hyperkalemia, especially in patients with impaired renal function. Finerenone, a novel nonsteroidal MRA, shows a higher selectivity and binding affinity for mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) compared to steroidal MRAs and has been shown to reduce chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression and cardiovascular mortality in patients with CKD and T2DM.. This review summarizes the current evidence on efficacy and safety of finerenone in the treatment of patients with CKD and T2DM, and discusses its mechanisms of action investigated in preclinical studies.. Pharmacological properties of finerenone and its unique tissue distribution are responsible for a lower risk of hyperkalemia. Therefore, finerenone represents a valuable therapeutic tool in patients with CKD/diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Recent studies have shown that finerenone delays the progression of CKD and reduce cardiovascular events in patients with DKD, highlighting its safety and efficacy in this high-risk population.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Naphthyridines; Receptors, Mineralocorticoid; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume

Finerenone is a novel non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) recently approved for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). We aim to conduct a systematic review of finerenone to know the efficacy and safety of finerenone in CKD with or without T2D.. A systematic search in the electronic database of PubMed and Google Scholar was made from inception until September 09, 2022, using several MeSH keywords related to finerenone. Ongoing trials were additionally searched from ClinicalTrials.Gov.. Five phase 2 and three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo- or active-controlled studies of finerenone have been published to date and several other randomized and real-world studies of finerenone are currently undergoing.. In short-term studies in patients with CKD and reduced ejection heart failure, with or without T2D, finerenone 20 mg appears to have a better renal outcome compared with spironolactone and a better mortality outcome compared with eplerenone, with significantly lesser hyperkalemia compared to both spironolactone and finerenone. In long-term studies in patients with CKD and T2D, finerenone 10/20 mg significantly reduces the progression of renal disease and reduced CV endpoints (especially heart failure hospitalization) compared to placebo. Finerenone has no effect on HbA1c, body weight, and sexual side effects including gynecomastia, and has only a modest effect on blood pressure. However, hyperkalemia leading to drug withdrawal was significantly higher with finerenone compared to placebo. Safety data in real-world settings is a pressing priority.

Topics: Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Diabetic Nephropathies; Eplerenone; Glycated Hemoglobin; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular death and morbidity. Several clinical studies suggested that aldosterone antagonists would be a promising treatment option for people undergoing dialysis. However, the clinical efficacy and potential harm of aldosterone antagonists for people with CKD on dialysis has yet to be determined.. This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in people with CKD requiring haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD).. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 August 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, and quasi-RCTs (where group allocation is by a method that is not truly random, such as alternation, assignment based on alternate medical records, date of birth, case record number, or other predictable methods) that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis.. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity among the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.. We included 16 studies (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over RCTs) involving a total of 1446 participants. Thirteen studies compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one study compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists probably reduced the risk of death (any cause) for people with CKD requiring dialysis (9 studies, 1119 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist probably decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 studies, 908 participants: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 studies, 328 participants: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists probably increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 studies, 768 participants: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), aldosterone antagonists may make little or no difference to the risk of hyperkalaemia (9 studies, 981 participants: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; I² = 47%; low certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonists had a marginal effect on left ventricular mass among participants undergoing dialysis (8 studies, 633 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.05; I² = 77%). In people with CKD requiring dialysis received aldosterone antagonists compared to control, there were 72 fewer deaths from all causes per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 to 98) with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 14 (95% CI 10 to 21) and for gynaecomastia were 26 events per 1000 participants (95% CI 15 to 39) with a number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) of 38 (95% CI 26 to 68).. Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists probably reduces the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and probably reduces morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in people with CKD requiring dialysis. For the adverse effect of gynaecomastia, the risk was increased compared to control. For this outcome, the absolute risk was lower than the absolute risk of death. It is hoped the three large ongoing studies will provide better certainty of evidence.

Topics: Bias; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2009 and updated in 2014.. To evaluate the effects of aldosterone antagonists (selective (eplerenone), non-selective (spironolactone or canrenone), or non-steroidal mineralocorticoid antagonists (finerenone)) in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including kidney failure (previously know as end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)), major cardiovascular events, and death (any cause); kidney function (proteinuria, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and doubling of serum creatinine); blood pressure; and adverse events (including hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury, and gynaecomastia).. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 January 2020 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal, and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) to other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo in participants with proteinuric CKD.. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used together with their 95% confidence interval (CI). Risk of bias were assessed using the Cochrane tool. Evidence certainty was evaluated using GRADE.. Forty-four studies (5745 participants) were included. Risk of bias in the evaluated methodological domains were unclear or high risk in most studies. Adequate random sequence generation was present in 12 studies, allocation concealment in five studies, blinding of participant and investigators in 18 studies, blinding of outcome assessment in 15 studies, and complete outcome reporting in 24 studies. All studies comparing aldosterone antagonists to placebo or standard care were used in addition to an ACEi or ARB (or both). None of the studies were powered to detect differences in patient-level outcomes including kidney failure, major cardiovascular events or death. Aldosterone antagonists had uncertain effects on kidney failure (2 studies, 84 participants: RR 3.00, 95% CI 0.33 to 27.65, I² = 0%; very low certainty evidence), death (3 studies, 421 participants: RR 0.58, 95% CI 0.10 to 3.50, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence), and cardiovascular events (3 studies, 1067 participants: RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.26 to 3.56; I² = 42%; low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce protein excretion (14 studies, 1193 participants: SMD -0.51, 95% CI -0.82 to -0.20, I² = 82%; very low certainty evidence), eGFR (13 studies, 1165 participants, MD -3.00 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.51 to -0.49, I² = 0%, low certainty evidence) and systolic blood pressure (14 studies, 911 participants: MD -4.98 mmHg, 95% CI -8.22 to -1.75, I² = 87%; very low certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Aldosterone antagonists probably increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (17 studies, 3001 participants: RR 2.17, 95% CI 1.47 to 3.22, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), acute kidney injury (5 studies, 1446 participants: RR 2.04, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.97, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence), and gynaecomastia (4 studies, 281 participants: RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23, I² = 0%; moderate certainty evidence) compared to placebo or standard care. Non-selective aldosterone antagonists plus ACEi or ARB had uncertain effects on protein excretion (2 studies, 139 participants: SMD -1.59, 95% CI -3.80 to 0.62, I² = 93%; very low certainty evidence) but may increase serum potassium (2 studies, 121 participants: MD 0.31 mEq/L, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.45, I² = 0%; low certainty evidence) compared to diuretics plus ACEi or ARB. Selective aldosterone antagonists may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia (2 studies, 500 participants: RR 1.62, 95% CI 0.66 to 3.95, I² =. The effects of aldosterone antagonists when added to ACEi or ARB (or both) on the risks of death, major cardiovascular events, and kidney failure in people with proteinuric CKD are uncertain. Aldosterone antagonists may reduce proteinuria, eGFR, and systolic blood pressure in adults who have mild to moderate CKD but may increase the risk of hyperkalaemia, acute kidney injury and gynaecomastia when added to ACEi and/or ARB.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Bias; Calcium Channel Blockers; Canrenone; Disease Progression; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Naphthyridines; Proteinuria; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spironolactone

The efficacy and safety of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in patients with heart failure (HF) are controversial. To explore the role of MRAs in HF patients with an ejection fraction of no more than 45%, we conducted a network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Clinicaltrials. RCTs involving the efficacy and/or safety of the use of MRAs in patients with HF were included. Outputs are presented as the surface under the cumulative ranking area (SUCRA) probabilities. Thirteen RCTs involving a total of 13,597 participants were included. Finerenone 10 mg was associated with the lowest probability of achieving at cardiovascular mortality (SUCRA, 5.0%), followed by finerenone 7.5 mg (SUCRA, 31.6%). In reducing N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, finerenone 15 mg and finerenone 7.5 mg ranked the best and second best (SUCRA 68.1% and 63.8%, respectively), followed by finerenone 10 mg (SUCRA 59.2%). Spironolactone and canrenone have a higher risk of hyperkalemia and renal deterioration. Regarding the prevention of worsening renal function, finerenone 7.5 mg (SUCRA 14.3%) was the best treatment, followed by finerenone 2.5 mg (SUCRA 16.3%) and finerenone 10 mg (SUCRA 25.6%). Compared with spironolactone and eplerenone, finerenone 10 mg was associated with low risk in the occurrence of cardiovascular mortality, hospitalization, and adverse events (P < 0.01). This network meta-analysis is the first to find that finerenone 7.5-10 mg has the highest probability of being the optimal alternative among MRAs in the treatment of HF patients with an ejection fraction of no more than 45%.

Topics: Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Naphthyridines; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Network Meta-Analysis; Peptide Fragments; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Insufficiency; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome

Potassium-sparing diuretics (PSDs) are valuable antihypertensives with additional benefits unrelated to control of systolic blood pressure (SBP). However, their key parameters affecting SBP and serum potassium are poorly defined, fostering underutilization.. Consequently, we conducted systematic reviews and meta-analyses, yielding 3668 articles and ultimately 84 randomized comparisons.. For office SBP, overall placebo-adjusted changes were triamterene -1.9 (low dose only), amiloride -9.9, spironolactone -13.2, and eplerenone -9.2. Differences in antihypertensive effect were due to potency rather than efficacy. Doubling amiloride, eplerenone, and spironolactone doses reduced SBP (95% confidence limits) on average by -2.3 (-3.1, -1.5). Relative antihypertensive potencies were spironolactone>amiloride>eplerenone. Spironolactone had significantly greater antihypertensive potency than amiloride, -4.0 (-7.4, -0.6), and eplerenone, -5.5 (-7.4, -3.6). Dose equivalencies were eplerenone-spironolactone 4.5-to-1 (e.g., eplerenone 125∼spironolactone 25), amiloride-spironolactone 3.3-to-1, and eplerenone-amiloride 1.4-to-1. Increases in serum potassium from amiloride and spironolactone at commonly used doses averaged 0.14-0.29 mEq/l; the dose doubling effect was 0.16 (0.10, 0.22). Spironolactone caused greater hyperkalemia than amiloride across their dose ranges: 0.14, P = 0.043. Seven features make important bias unlikely: a comprehensive literature search, adjustment for covariates, all models explaining 95-100% of the between-study variability, similar dose doubling effects among PSDs, two different methods giving the same potency sequence, similar results from double blind comparisons, and similar results for eplerenone versus spironolactone from analysing direct comparison data (i.e., no meta-regression) for office and 24-h SBP.. This synthesis accomplishes for PSDs what has already been achieved for thiazide-type diuretics and other antihypertensives and can guide the application of these underutilized medicines.

Topics: Amiloride; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Potassium; Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors; Spironolactone; Therapeutic Equivalency; Triamterene

Heart failure (HF), with or without reduced ejection fraction, and multidrug-resistant hypertension (RHT) are major worldwide health problems of ever-increasing proportions. The mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) spironolactone and eplerenone have proved valuable additions to the overall management of these disorders in patients without significant renal dysfunction.. Neurohormonal activation, including aldosteronism, in HF and RHT, has provided the pathophysiologic basis for the inclusion of MRA in the overall management of these disorders and the respective survival benefit and control of blood pressure. Furthermore, MRAs attenuate the appearance of secondary hyperparathyroidism that accompanies excretory Ca2+ losses induced by aldosteronism in which elevated parathyroid hormone levels raise the risk of adverse cardiovascular events and atraumatic bone fracture. Serial surveillance of serum electrolytes and creatinine levels is mandated to avoid serious hyperkalemia (potassium concentration >5.5 mEq/L) and its attendant risks in patients receiving MRAs.. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists are a valuable addition to the practice of medicine. Their judicious use in patients with HF or RHT can improve treatment of these patients.

Topics: Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Blockade of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is a standard therapeutic intervention in diabetic patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Concomitant mineralocorticoid receptor blockade has been studied as a novel approach to further slow down CKD progression. We used PubMed and EMBASE databases to search for relevant literature. We included in our review eight studies in patients of at least 18 years of age, with a diagnosis of type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic nephropathy, under an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI) and/or an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) as standard treatment. A subset of patients in each study also received a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker (MRB) (either spironolactone or eplerenone) in addition to standard treatment. Combined treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor blocker further reduced albuminuria by 23 to 61% compared with standard treatment. Estimated glomerular filtration rate values upon study completion slightly decreased under combined treatment. Blood pressure levels upon study completion were significantly lower with combined treatment in three studies. Hyperkalemia prevalence increased in patients under combined treatment raising dropout rate up to 17%. Therefore, combined treatment by an ACEI/ARB and a MRB may further decrease albuminuria in diabetic nephropathy. This effect may be due to the specific properties of the MRB treatment. Clinicians should regularly check potassium levels because of the increased risk of hyperkalemia. Available evidence should be confirmed by an adequately powered comparative trial of the standard treatment (ACEI or ARB) versus combined treatment by an ACEI/ARB and a MRB.

Topics: Albuminuria; Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Diabetic Nephropathies; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eplerenone; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome

The converging clinical effectiveness of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) Spironolactone and Eplerenone has made their safety profiles/cost-effectiveness key determinants of "agents of choice" across a broad range of clinical indications. The clinical biology of the aldosterone molecule and its range of effects in varied organ systems have been well elucidated from recent mechanistic and systematic studies. Clinical experience with Spironolactone is well established, as is its adverse effects profile. The range of adverse effects experienced with Spironolactone subsequently led to its modification and synthesis of Eplerenone. Recent published reports have confirmed lower prevalence rates of sex-related adverse effects attributable to Eplerenone compared to Spironolactone. There is, however, not much to choose between these agents in regards to other adverse effects including hyperkalemia and kidney failure. As was the experience with Spironolactone, as more robust observational data on Eplerenone accrues, it is possible that the real-life experience of its adverse profile may be discordant with that reported by randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs). In addition, its metabolism by the vulnerable and highly polymorphic cytochrome dependent pathway also makes it susceptible to various drug interactions. The potential implication of the latter (including morbidity and mortality) may take years to evolve.

Topics: Animals; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Treatment with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEi) and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB) is increasingly used to reduce proteinuria and retard the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, resolution of proteinuria may be incomplete with these therapies and the addition of an aldosterone antagonist may be added to further prevent progression of CKD. This is an update of a review first published in 2009.. To evaluate the effect of aldosterone antagonists (both selective (eplerenone) and non-selective (spironolactone)) alone or in combination with ACEi or ARB in adults who have CKD with proteinuria (nephrotic and non-nephrotic range) on: patient-centred endpoints including major cardiovascular events, hospitalisation and all-cause mortality; kidney function (proteinuria, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), serum creatinine, and need for renal replacement therapy; and adverse events (including gynaecomastia and hyperkalaemia).. For this update, we searched the Cochrane Renal Group's Specialised Register to 30 January 2013 using search terms relevant to this review.. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs that compared aldosterone antagonists alone or in combination with ACEi or ARB (or both) with other anti-hypertensive strategies or placebo.. Two authors independently assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were summarised using random effects meta-analysis. We tested for heterogeneity in estimated treatment effects using the Cochran Q test and I² statistic. We expressed summary treatment estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with their 95% confidence intervals (CI) and mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean difference (SMD) when different scales were used.. We identified 27 studies (1549 participants) that were eligible for inclusion. These studies provided no data relating to aldosterone antagonists in addition to ACEi or ARB (or both) on patient-level outcomes including major cardiovascular events and mortality and progression to end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) requiring dialysis or transplantation.Compared with ACEi or ARB (or both), non-selective aldosterone antagonists (spironolactone) combined with ACEi or ARB (or both) significantly reduced 24-hour protein excretion (11 studies, 596 participants): SMD -0.61, 95% CI -1.08 to -0.13). There was a significant reduction in both systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) at the end of treatment with additional non-selective aldosterone antagonist therapy (systolic BP (10 studies, 556 participants): MD -3.44 mm Hg, 95% CI -5.05 to -1.83) (diastolic BP (9 studies, 520 participants): MD -1.73 mm Hg, 95% CI -2.83 to -0.62).However, we found that aldosterone antagonist treatment had imprecise effects at the end of treatment on GFR (9 studies, 528 participants; MD -2.55 mL/min/1.73 m², 95% CI -5.67 to 0.51), doubled the risk of hyperkalaemia (11 studies, 632 patients): RR 2.00, 95% CI 1.25 to 3.20; number needed to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH): 7.2, 95% CI 3.4 to ∞) and increased the risk of gynaecomastia compared to ACEi or ARB (or both) (4 studies, 281 patients): RR 5.14, 95% CI 1.14 to 23.23; NNTH: 14.1, 95% CI 8.7 to 37.3).Most studies enrolled few patients (range 12 to 268) and were powered to observe differences in surrogate end points rather than patient-focused outcomes. Nine studies had a cross-over design and the majority of studies did not adequately report study methods to assess methods and study quality.. Aldosterone antagonists reduced proteinuria and blood pressure in adults who had mild to moderate CKD and were treated with ACEi or ARB (or both), but increase hyperkalaemia and gynaecomastia. Whether adding aldosterone antagonists to ACEi or ARB (or both) reduced the risk of major cardiovascular events or ESKD in this population is unknown.

Topics: Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Disease Progression; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Proteinuria; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spironolactone

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA's) have been shown to be effective in patients with HFREF while their role in patients with HFPEF remains controversial. Despite a class one indication in both the ESC and AHA/ACC heart failure guidelines in patients with HFREF MRA's remain underused, in large part due to the fear of hyperkalaemia and renal dysfunction. While hyperkalaemia is a potential risk of MRA's, their use when potassium and renal function monitoring is properly carried out is minimal compared with their benefits in appropriate patients. New nonsteroidal MRA's and new potassium binding polymers currently under development hold the promise of further reducing the risks of hyperkalaemia while allowing higher doses of MRA's. They have been shown to overcome diuretic resistance and to potentially extend their benefits to patients with acute decompensated heart failure and those with chronic renal disease. While we await the results of studies with these new agents; application of current guidelines recommended therapies, including MRA's hold the best promise to further reduce cardiovascular mortality, hospitalisations for heart failure, and therefore, health care costs in patients with heart failure.

Topics: Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone; Stroke Volume; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Eplerenone (Inspra®) is a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). In the EU, it is approved for use (in addition to standard optimal therapy) to reduce the risk of cardiovascular (CV) mortality and morbidity in adult patients with chronic systolic heart failure (HF) and mild symptoms. This article reviews the efficacy and tolerability of eplerenone in this indication and briefly summarizes its pharmacology. In the EMPHASIS-HF study, relative to placebo, the addition of eplerenone to optimal background therapy significantly reduced the risk of death from CV causes or hospitalization for HF in patients with chronic systolic HF and mild symptoms. Benefits of eplerenone therapy over placebo were also observed in several secondary outcomes, including: death from any cause or hospitalization for HF; death from any cause; hospitalization for any reason; or hospitalization for HF. Eplerenone was generally well tolerated in this study, with the most frequent adverse event being hyperkalaemia, which is a known adverse event of the drug class. Sexual adverse events (e.g. gynecomastia) occurred in <1 % of eplerenone recipients, reflecting the selectivity of eplerenone for mineralocorticoid receptors. Based on these results, European guidelines have been updated and recommend the use of an MRA to reduce the risk of HF hospitalization and premature death in all patients with persisting symptoms (New York Heart Association class II-IV) and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of ≤35 %, despite treatment with ACE inhibitor (or an angiotensin receptor blocker if an ACE inhibitor is not tolerated) and a β-blocker.

Topics: Adult; Device Approval; Drug Interactions; Eplerenone; European Union; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Severity of Illness Index; Spironolactone

Despite numerous pharmacologic and nonpharmacologic treatment strategies, heart failure remains a complex, progressive disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), and β-blockers have been used as routine treatment options for heart failure for the majority of patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction who tolerate these agents. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) have also demonstrated significant benefits in the treatment of heart failure, which include a reduction in sudden cardiac death and ventricular remodeling; however, these agents have not been recommended for most patients with heart failure. In the most recent American College of Cardiology Foundation and American Heart Association guidelines, MRAs are recommended for patients with New York Heart Association class III or IV symptoms or previous acute myocardial infarction, provided an absence of contraindications or risk factors for developing hyperkalemia. Based on more recent evidence, it is likely that future recommendations and guidelines will further expand the use of MRAs to patients with mild heart failure as well. These agents have the potential to be recommended nearly as universally as ACE inhibitors and β-blockers because of the potential to reduce mortality and hospital admissions for heart failure. The risk of hyperkalemia should be carefully assessed when using these drugs; nonetheless, new strategies being developed may reduce the occurrence of hyperkalemia as well.

Topics: Death, Sudden, Cardiac; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Ventricular Remodeling

Aldosterone antagonists represented by nonselective spironolactone and mineralocorticoid-selective eplerenone are approved for treatment of symptomatic heart failure with reduced systolic function. Their cardioprotective, antifibrotic, and antiarrhythmic effects have been proven in animal experiments, and their effects on morbidity and mortality have been demonstrated in randomized clinical trials. Yet, they remain the most underutilized of all classes of medications for heart failure, primarily because of fear of hyperkalemia. Thorough patient screening and selection is the key for minimizing risks and optimizing benefits from these drugs. Ongoing trials will demonstrate whether the indication for aldosterone antagonists can be expanded to less severe heart failure or patients with preserved systolic function.

Topics: Aldosterone; Animals; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Patient Selection; Severity of Illness Index; Spironolactone

In this article, we review the evidence supporting the use of eplerenone for improving cardiovascular prognosis. Activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system plays a major role in the pathogenesis of heart disease, and blockage of this system has been shown to improve prognosis in several cardiovascular conditions. The 2 marketed aldosterone antagonists, spironolactone and eplerenone, improve prognosis in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and are effective antihypertensive medications. In addition, a potential role for aldosterone antagonists in the treatment of patients with heart failure and preserved LV function has been suggested and is currently being evaluated in clinical trials. In patients with myocardial infarction having LV dysfunction and evidence of heart failure, eplerenone improves cardiovascular outcomes and attenuates myocardial remodeling. In addition, eplerenone is effective for the treatment of hypertension, where it regresses both LV hypertrophy and proteinuria (2 powerful markers of increased cardiovascular risk). In contrast to spironolactone, eplerenone essentially lacks the sexual side effects that sometimes limit the use of spironolactone. Hyperkalemia is the main potential side effect of eplerenone, especially when used in combination with other medications that can cause hyperkalemia. Adequate patient selection and monitoring are therefore of utmost importance when using this medication. In conclusion, eplerenone is a medication that offers the cardiovascular therapeutic and prognostic benefits of aldosterone antagonism but with fewer side effects compared to spironolactone.

Topics: Cardiovascular Diseases; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left; Ventricular Remodeling

Eplerenone is an aldosterone receptor antagonist indicated for the treatment of hypertension and congestive heart failure. Eplerenone contains an epoxy group, which offers greater mineralocorticoid receptor specificity. It is an effective antihypertensive that has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality in individuals with left ventricular dysfunction post myocardial infarction. Studies are continuing to determine whether the benefit of mineralocorticoid receptor blockade in advanced congestive heart failure is also observed when eplerenone treatment is initiated in earlier stages of the disease. The most common side effect is hyperkalemia necessitating close monitoring in individuals with diabetes and proteinuria, heart failure or in those who are taking moderate CYP450 3A4 inhibitors. It is category B in pregnancy.

Topics: Animals; Controlled Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

The presence of heart failure or left ventricular systolic dysfunction in the setting of acute myocardial infarction is associated with poor prognosis. Aldosterone is an important downstream mediator of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system that promotes myocardial collagen deposition, myocardial fibrosis, apoptosis, ventricular remodeling, and endothelial dysfunction. It may play an important role in the increased morbidity and mortality and the development and progression of heart failure after acute myocardial infarction. Extending the findings from the Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study (RALES) in patients with chronic heart failure, the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) demonstrated that the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone offered a significant survival benefit, attenuation of progression of heart failure, and prevention of sudden cardiac death when used in addition to optimal medical therapy. The current evidence-based guidelines now suggest that aldosterone blockade should be an integral component of heart failure therapy to improve outcomes in this high-risk population.

Topics: Eplerenone; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Receptors, Mineralocorticoid; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Based on the RALES study, in patients with moderate to severe chronic heart failure and reduced left ventricular function, the nonselective aldosterone antagonist spironolactone has a well-established role in combination with ACE inhibition, beta-blockade and diuretics. This indication was recently reinforced by the guideline for chronic heart failure therapy of the German Cardiac Society, although there is no formal approval for spironolactone for this indication in Germany.. Heart failure after acute myocardial infarction represents a new indication for aldosterone receptor blockade. In the EPHESUS trial of patients with acute myocardial infarction, reduced ejection fraction, and clinical signs of heart failure, the selective aldosterone antagonist eplerenone in combination with ACE inhibition and beta-blockade significantly reduced mortality. The best benefit was achieved by early treatment, i. e., starting 3-7 days post myocardial infarction. In addition, as early as after 30 days, eplerenone-treated patients had significantly reduced mortality and hospitalization. Eplerenone was approved for the indication heart failure after acute myocardial infarction in late 2004 in Germany.. The present review summarizes the pathophysiological basis, the experimental and clinical trials that constitute the rationale for therapy with aldosterone antagonists in patients with acute myocardial infarction and heart failure. Tips for use in clinical practice are given which allow to profit from the effective potential for mortality and morbidity reduction of aldosterone receptor blockade and to minimize the risk of serious hyperkalemia.

Topics: Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diuretics; Drug Approval; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Development of heart failure (HF) or left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) significantly increases mortality post acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Aldosterone contributes to the development and progression of HF post AMI, and major guidelines now recommend aldosterone blockade in this setting. However, lack of practical experience with aldosterone blockade may make clinicians hesitant to use these therapies. This review is based on a consensus cardiology conference that occurred in May 2005 (New York City) concerning these topics. Potential barriers to the use of aldosterone blockade are discussed and an algorithm for appropriate in-hospital pharmacologic management of AMI with LVSD and/or HF is presented.

Topics: Algorithms; Cardiac Output, Low; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Systole; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

In recent years, there has been a striking paradigm shift with respect to our understanding of the widespread effects of aldosterone. Whereas the role of angiotensin II in mediating progressive renal disease and heart failure has been documented extensively, more recent evidence has implicated aldosterone as an important pathogenetic factor in addition to angiotensin II in the development of these diseases. The focus of this review is aldosterone and progressive renal dysfunction. The extensive preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the efficacy of aldosterone blockade in abrogating proteinuria is summarized. The frequency and clinical importance of aldosterone "escape" is reviewed. Therapeutic considerations to reduce the incidence of hyperkalemia with aldosterone blockade are discussed. The studies reviewed have several important clinical implications for considering new treatment algorithms for patients with incipient nephropathy. Because full doses of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers attenuate but do not abrogate progression of renal dysfunction, add-on aldosterone blockade therapy may constitute a rational therapeutic strategy for retarding progression of renal disease.

Topics: Aldosterone; Algorithms; Disease Progression; Disease Susceptibility; Drug Labeling; Eplerenone; Fibrosis; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renal Agents; Renal Insufficiency; Spironolactone

Spironolactone and eplerenone are mineralocorticoid- blocking agents used for their ability to block a host of epithelial and nonepithelial actions of aldosterone. These compounds are of proven benefit in reducing blood pressure and urine protein excretion, and in conferring cardiovascular gain in diverse circumstances of heart failure. However, as enthusiasm grows for use of mineralocorticoid-blocking agents, the risks inherent to use of such drugs become more pertinent. Whereas the endocrine side effects of spironolactone are in reality little more than a cosmetic disfigurement, the potassium-sparing properties of spironolactone and eplerenone can prove life-threatening if hyperkalemia develops. However, for most patients the risk of developing hyperkalemia should not dissuade the prudent clinician from use of these compounds. Hyperkalemia should be considered as a possibility in any patient receiving these medications and as such is best addressed preemptively.

Topics: Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Drug Monitoring; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone; Survival Analysis; Treatment Outcome

Accumulating evidence indicates that aldosterone is involved in cardiovascular disease by inducing inflammation in the presence of moderate amounts of salt in the diet. Spironolactone and eplerenone are the mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists currently available for the treatment of hypertension. They have similar safety and antihypertensive efficacy. The advantage of eplerenone is the lower incidence of anti-androgenic and progestational side effects. The rationale for using MR blockade in the treatment of hypertension is threefold: the evidence of antihypertensive efficacy, the phenomenon of "aldosterone escape" occurring with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin-receptor blockade therapy, and the compelling evidence that MR antagonism reduces target-organ damage in hypertensive patients and improves survival in patients with cardiovascular disease. Thus, blockade of the MR may be very useful in many patients with hypertension, particularly those at risk for or having evidence of target-organ damage.

Topics: Albuminuria; Aldosterone; Animals; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renin-Angiotensin System; Spironolactone; Vasodilation

The role of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system in the pathophysiology and treatment of hypertension and heart failure has been extensively studied. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II-receptor blockers have been shown to effectively reduce blood pressure, protect the kidney, and reduce morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Therefore, there is increased interest in the effects of aldosterone and the use of aldosterone-receptor antagonists in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Eplerenone is the first selective aldosterone-receptor antagonist approved for the treatment of hypertension and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction (AMI).. The goal of this article was to review the pharmacologic properties, clinical efficacy, and tolerability of eplerenone in the treatment of hypertension, LV dysfunction, and proteinuria.. Relevant English-language articles were identified through searches of MEDLINE (1966-May 2003), Current Contents, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-May 2003) using the terms hypertension, heart failure, eplerenone, aldosterone, and aldosterone antagonist. Other pertinent publications were identified from the reference lists of the identified articles. Information was also obtained from abstracts presented at national meetings and data on file with the manufacturer.. In clinical trials, eplerenone alone and in combination with renin-angiotensin blockade significantly reduced both systolic and diastolic blood pressure compared with placebo (P < 0.05 to P < 0.001). In EPHESUS (Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study), the addition eplerenone to optimal medical therapy reduced morbidity and mortality in patients with AMI and LV dysfunction, although the incidence of serious hyperkalemia was also significantly greater. In comparisons with spironolactone, eplerenone was associated with a lower incidence of gynecomastia and other sex hormone-related adverse effects.. Either alone or in combination with other antihypertensive agents, eplerenone appears to be effective for the treatment of hypertension. Morbidity and mortality were reduced when eplerenone was added to standard therapy for LV dysfunction complicating AMI. The use of eplerenone for hypertension or heart failure may be limited in patients at risk for hyperkalemia.

Topics: Area Under Curve; Clinical Trials as Topic; Drug Interactions; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Proteinuria; Spironolactone; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Literature supports the protective role of mineralocorticoid antagonist (MRA) against the renal injury induced by aldosterone in kidney transplant recipients. However, there is limited data available regarding the safety and efficacy of MRAs in pediatric renal transplant patients. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the effect of long-term eplerenone administration in children with chronic allograft nephropathy (CAN).. The long-term eplerenone administration blunted the chronic allograft nephropathy by maintaining a stable eGFR levels and decreasing urine protein-creatinine ratio. Eplerenone associated hyperkalemia was not observed in our study.

Topics: Allografts; Child; Creatinine; Eplerenone; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Finerenone, a nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, was evaluated in Japanese patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction and chronic kidney disease and/or diabetes mellitus.. ARTS-HF Japan was a randomized, double-blind, phase 2b study. Patients (n=72) received oral, once-daily (o.d.) finerenone (2.5, 5, 7.5, 10 or 15 mg, up-titrated to 5, 10, 15, 20, or 20 mg, respectively, on day 30) or eplerenone (25 mg every other day, increased to 25 mg o.d. on day 30, and 50 mg on day 60) for 90 days. The primary endpoint was the proportion of individuals with a decrease of >30% in plasma NT-proBNP at day 90. Safety endpoints included the incidence of hyperkalemia. Decreases in NT-proBNP occurred in 23.1% of patients in the eplerenone group and 15.4%, 23.1%, 45.5%, 27.3% and 45.5% in the 2.5→5 mg, 5→10 mg, 7.5→15 mg, 10→20 mg and 15→20 mg finerenone groups, respectively (all P=NS). Mean changes in serum potassium levels were similar between groups.. Because of the small sample size, limited conclusions can be drawn. Considering the results of ARTS-HF and that finerenone was well tolerated in Japanese patients in ARTS-HF Japan, the safety and efficacy of finerenone should be further explored in a large outcomes trial including Japanese patients. (Circ J 2016; 80: 1113-1122).

Topics: Adult; Chronic Disease; Diabetes Mellitus; Double-Blind Method; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Japan; Naphthyridines; Natriuretic Peptide, Brain; Patient Safety; Peptide Fragments; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone

Cardiovascular hospitalization (CVH) in patients with heart failure (HF) is associated with a high post-discharge rate of early re-admission and CV death. Eplerenone might be effective in reducing the incidence of these adverse clinical outcomes during this period.. The EMPHASIS-HF trial compared eplerenone with placebo added to standard therapy in 2737 patients with New York Heart Association class II HF and left ventricular ejection fraction ≤35%. We conducted a post hoc analysis in the 2338 patients randomized within 180 days of a CVH. The interaction between the time from the qualifying CVH to randomization and the primary outcome of CV death or hospitalization for HF (HHF), as well as other secondary outcomes, was assessed in Cox survival models. Most of the qualifying CVHs were HHF (N = 1496, 64.0%), acute coronary syndromes (N = 390, 16.7%), and arrhythmias (N = 197, 7.2%). The median time of study drug initiation from qualifying CVH was 42 days. The relative rate reductions in CV death/HHF, HHF, and all-cause mortality were similar (P for interaction = 0.65, 0.44, and 0.40, respectively) whether the treatment was initiated <42 or 42+ days after qualifying CVH. Absolute rate reductions were -5.61 [-8.67, -2.55] events per 100 patient × years in the <42 days group and -3.58 [-6.37, -0.79] in the 42+ days group. The adverse effects of eplerenone were also unaffected by the time from the qualifying CVH.. Eplerenone is safe, improves survival, and may prevent re-admission when initiated soon after a hospitalization for HF or acute coronary syndromes in patients with systolic HF and mild symptoms.

Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Aged; Eplerenone; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Heart Failure, Systolic; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Patient Readmission; Secondary Prevention; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism reduces morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure, but the safety of these drugs in patients receiving dialysis is unclear. This study evaluated whether hyperkalemia and/or hypotension limited the use of eplerenone, a selective mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, in hemodialysis patients.. This was a randomized controlled trial of prevalent patients receiving hemodialysis at five Canadian centers. Participants were randomly allocated to 13 weeks of eplerenone titrated to 50 mg daily (n=77) or a matching placebo (n=77). The primary outcome was permanent discontinuation of the drug because of hyperkalemia or hypotension. Secondary outcomes included hyperkalemia, hypotension, and cardiovascular events.. Seventy-five eplerenone-treated patients and 71 placebo-treated patients were included in the per protocol population. The primary outcome occurred in three patients (4.0%) in the eplerenone group and two (2.8%) in the placebo group, for an absolute risk difference of 1.2 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -4.7 to 7.1 percentage points). Eplerenone was interpreted as noninferior to placebo with respect to the primary outcome (i.e., a discontinuation rate for these reasons >10% was excluded). In the eplerenone group, nine patients (11.7%) developed hyperkalemia (potassium level >6.5 mEq/L), compared with two patients (2.6%) in the placebo group (relative risk, 4.5; 95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 20.2). There was no significant effect on predialysis or postdialysis BP.. Eplerenone increased the risk of hyperkalemia but did not result in an excess need to permanently discontinue the drug. Further trials are required to determine whether mineralocorticoid receptor antagonism improves cardiovascular outcomes in patients receiving long-term dialysis.

Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypotension; Kidney Failure, Chronic; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Pilot Projects; Potassium; Renal Dialysis; Spironolactone; Withholding Treatment

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with systolic heart failure but may induce worsening of renal function (WRF) and hyperkalemia (HK). We assessed the risk factors for mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist-related WRF and for HK, as well as the association between HK and WRF with clinical outcomes in the Eplerenone in Mild Patients Hospitalization and Survival Study in Heart Failure (EMPHASIS-HF).. Serial changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate and in serum potassium were available in 2737 patients during a median 21-month follow-up. HK variably defined as serum K>4.5, 5, or 5.5 mmol/L occurred in 74.7%, 32.5%, and 8.9% patients enrolled in EMPHASIS-HF, respectively. WRF defined as a decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate>20% or >30% from baseline occurred in 27% and 14% of patients, respectively. Patients assigned eplerenone displayed modest and early but significant and persistent (1) rise in serum potassium and (2) reduction in estimated glomerular filtration rate when compared with those assigned placebo. In multivariate analyses, eplerenone was associated with a higher incidence of WRF and HK, which were interrelated and also associated with baseline patient characteristics (eg, age≥75 years, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, nonwhite race, ejection fraction<30%, and treatment with an antiarrythmics drug or loop diuretic). Eplerenone retained its survival benefits without any significant interaction with the association between HK>5.5 mmol/L only and WRF and worse outcomes.. In patients with heart failure receiving optimal therapy, WRF and HK were more frequent when eplerenone was added, but their occurrence did not eliminate the survival benefit of eplerenone.. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00232180.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Eplerenone; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Incidence; Longitudinal Studies; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Multivariate Analysis; Potassium; Prognosis; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Survival Rate

The study sought to investigate the safety and efficacy of eplerenone in patients at high risk for hyperkalemia or worsening renal function (WRF) in EMPHASIS-HF, a trial that enrolled patients at least 55 years old with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HF-REF), in New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class II and with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) >30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and serum potassium <5.0 mmol/l. Patients were receiving optimal therapy and most had been hospitalized for a cardiovascular reason within 180 days of inclusion.. Underuse of eplerenone in patients with HF-REF may be due to fear of inducing hyperkalemia or WRF in high-risk patients.. This was a pre-specified analysis of subgroups of patients at high risk of hyperkalemia or WRF (patients ≥ 75 years of age, with diabetes, with eGFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2), and with systolic blood pressure < median of 123 mm Hg), examining the major safety measures (potassium >5.5, >6.0, and <3.5 mmol/l; hyperkalemia leading to study-drug discontinuation or hospitalization; and hospitalization for WRF) as well as the primary outcome (hospitalization for HF or cardiovascular mortality).. In all high-risk subgroups, patients treated with eplerenone had an increased risk of potassium >5.5 mmol/l but not of potassium >6.0 mmol/l, and of hospitalization for hyperkalemia or discontinuation of study medication due to adverse events. Eplerenone was effective in reducing the primary composite endpoint in all subgroups.. In patients with chronic HF-REF, in NYHA functional class II, and meeting specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, including an eGFR >30 ml/min/1.73 m(2) and potassium <5.0 mmol/l, eplerenone was both efficacious and safe when carefully monitored, even in subgroups at high risk of developing hyperkalemia or WRF. (A Comparison Of Outcomes In Patients In New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class II Heart Failure When Treated With Eplerenone Or Placebo In Addition To Standard Heart Failure Medicines [EMPHASIS-HF Study]; NCT00232180).

Topics: Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Eplerenone; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney Function Tests; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Survival Rate; Treatment Outcome

Aldosterone antagonists have proven efficacy for management of resistant hypertension and proteinuria reduction; however, they are not widely used due to risk of hyperkalemia. This study assesses the risk factors for hyperkalemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and resistant hypertension whose blood pressure (BP) is reduced to a guideline goal.. This is a two-center study conducted in university-based hypertension clinics directed by clinical hypertension specialists. Forty-six patients with resistant hypertension and stages 2 or 3 CKD (mean estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 56.5 + or - 16.2 ml/min/1.73 m(2)) were evaluated for safety and efficacy of aldosterone blockade added to preexisting BP-lowering regimens. All patients were on three mechanistically complementary antihypertensive agents including a diuretic and a renin-angiotensin system blocker. Patients were evaluated after a median of 45 treatment days. The primary endpoint was change in systolic BP. Secondary endpoints included change in serum potassium, creatinine, eGFR, diastolic BP and tolerability.. The mean age of the patients studied was 64.9 + or - 10.7 years, all were obese and 86% had type 2 diabetes, with 82% being African-American. Addition of aldosterone antagonism yielded a further mean reduction in systolic BP of 14.7 + or - 5.1 mm Hg (p = 0.001). Females with BMI >30 and those with a baseline systolic BP >160 mm Hg were more likely to have a greater BP reduction to aldosterone antagonism. In total, 39% of the patients had a >30% decrease in eGFR when the BP goal was achieved. The mean increase in serum potassium was 0.4 mEq/l above baseline (p = 0.001), with 17.3% manifesting hyperkalemia, i.e. serum potassium >5.5 mEq/l. Predictors of hyperkalemia included a baseline eGFR of < or = 45 ml/min/1.73 m(2) in whom serum potassium was >4.5 mEq/l on appropriately dosed diuretics. Contributing risks in this subgroup included a systolic BP reduction of >15 mm Hg associated with an eGFR fall of >30%.. Aldosterone antagonism is effective and safe for achieving a BP goal among people with diabetic nephropathy when added to a triple antihypertensive regimen that includes a blocker of the renin-angiotensin system and an appropriately selected and dosed diuretic. Caution is advised when using aldosterone blockade for BP control in people with advanced stage 3 nephropathy with a serum potassium of >4.5 mEq/l for safety reasons.

Topics: Aged; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension, Renal; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Predictive Value of Tests; Proteinuria; Risk Factors; Spironolactone

Aldosterone blockade is recommended for patients with congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction; however, the perceived risk of hyperkalemia may limit implementation of this therapeutic approach. This subanalysis examined the relationship between eplerenone, serum potassium (K(+)), and clinical outcomes in the Eplerenone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS).. Hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure after acute myocardial infarction complicated by left ventricular systolic dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%) treated with standard therapy were randomized 3 to 14 days after the acute myocardial infarction to additional treatment with eplerenone (25 to 50 mg/d; n=3319) or placebo (n=3313). Patients were excluded if baseline K(+) was >5.0 mEq/L or serum creatinine was >2.5 mg/dL. In patients receiving standard therapy, the addition of eplerenone resulted in a 4.4% absolute increase in the incidence of K(+) >5.5 mEq/L, a 1.6% increase of K(+) > or =6.0 mEq/L, and a 4.7% absolute decrease in hypokalemia (K(+) <3.5 mEq/L). Four independent baseline predictors of hyperkalemia (defined as > or =6.0 mEq/L) were identified: potassium (K(+) greater than the median; 4.3 mEq/L), estimated glomerular filtration rate (< or =60 mL . min(-1) . 1.73 m(-2)), history of diabetes mellitus, and prior use of antiarrhythmic agents. None of these independent baseline risk factors significantly impacted the cardiovascular benefit of eplerenone for reducing all-cause mortality.. Use of selective aldosterone blockade with eplerenone within the dose range of 25 to 50 mg/d in post-acute myocardial infarction patients with heart failure and left ventricular systolic dysfunction who are treated with standard therapy improves outcomes without an excess of risk of hyperkalemia (> or =6.0 mEq/L) when periodic monitoring of serum K(+) is instituted.

Topics: Aged; Eplerenone; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Incidence; Logistic Models; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Potassium; Predictive Value of Tests; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

The aim of this prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point study was to compare the efficacy and safety of eplerenone versus spironolactone in patients with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA). After a 2-week washout period, 34 patients with IHA were assigned to receive either spironolactone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) or eplerenone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) for 24 weeks. If the patients' blood pressure (BP) was not < 140/90 mmHg, the doses were gradually increased up to 400 mg for spironolactone and 200 mg for eplerenone. If the patients' BP remained uncontrolled, a daily dose of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was added at week 16. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mmHg at 16 weeks (i.e., with aldosterone antagonist monotherapy). The patients' BP was normalised in 13 out of 17 (76.5%) and 14 out of 17 (82.4%) patients in the spironolactone and eplerenone groups, respectively (p = 1.00). Systolic BP decreased more rapidly with eplerenone. Serum potassium levels were normalised (> 3.5 mmol/l) in all patients at 4 weeks. Mild hyperkalaemia was observed in two patients receiving 400 mg of spironolactone and in three patients receiving 150 mg of eplerenone. Two patients presented with bilateral painful gynaecomastia at the end of week 16 while receiving 400 mg of spironolactone. Switching spironolactone to 150 mg of eplerenone daily resulted in resolution of gynaecomastia and also maintained BP control. At the end of the study, 19 patients were on eplerenone and 15 were on spironolactone. However, this did not affect the primary end point, because the switch from spironolactone to eplerenone (in two patients) occurred at the end of week 16. It was concluded that eplerenone was as effective as spironolactone in reducing BP in patients with IHA. The risk of mild hyperkalaemia was similar with both drugs.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Eplerenone; Female; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Hypokalemia; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Prospective Studies; Spironolactone; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Previous studies have shown that the selective aldosterone blocker eplerenone, in doses of up to 200 mg/d, reduces albuminuria in patients with type 2 diabetes. This study was conducted to ascertain whether lower doses of eplerenone (50 or 100 mg/d) co-administered with the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor enalapril would produce a similar antialbuminuric effect while obviating the hyperkalemia observed previously. After open-label run-in with enalapril 20 mg/d, patients with diabetes and a urinary albumin:creatinine ratio (UACR) > or = 50 mg/g were randomly assigned to receive enalapril plus one of three double-blind daily treatments for 12 wk: placebo, eplerenone 50 mg (EPL50), or eplerenone 100 mg (EPL100). After week 4, amlodipine 2.5 to 10 mg/d was allowed for BP control (systolic/diastolic BP < or = 130/80 mmHg). The primary study end points were the percentage change from baseline at week 12 in UACR and the incidence of hyperkalemia. Secondary end points included percentage changes from baseline in UACR at weeks 4 and 8 and changes from baseline in systolic and diastolic BP. Treatment with EPL50 or EPL100 but not placebo significantly reduced albuminuria from baseline. By week 12, UACR was reduced by 7.4% in the placebo group, by 41.0% in the EPL50 group, and by 48.4% in the EPL100 group (both eplerenone groups, P < 0.001 versus placebo). The incidences of sustained and severe hyperkalemia were not significantly different in any of the three treatment arms and did not differ on the basis of quartile of estimated GFR (all NS). For the secondary end points, both eplerenone treatment groups significantly reduced albuminuria from baseline as early as week 4 (P < 0.001), whereas placebo treatment (including enalapril) did not result in any significant decreases in UACR. Systolic BP decreased significantly in all treatment groups at all time points, but, generally, all treatment groups experienced similar decreases in BP. Co-administration of EPL50 or EPL100 with an ACE inhibitor as compared with an ACE inhibitor alone significantly reduces albuminuria in patients with diabetes without producing significant increases in hyperkalemia.

Topics: Aged; Albuminuria; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Blood Pressure; Creatinine; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Drug Therapy, Combination; Enalapril; Eplerenone; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Incidence; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome; United States

The influence of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of eplerenone following single and multiple dosing was evaluated. Subjects (n = 64) were stratified based on creatinine clearance values as follows: renal impairment (mild, moderate, severe), hemodialysis, and normal matches. Subjects received a single dose of eplerenone 100 mg on day 1 and then received 100 mg once daily on days 3 to 8. There were no statistically significant differences between any of the renal impairment groups and their matched-normal groups for area under the curve (AUC), C(max), or CL/F or CL/F/WT following either single or multiple dosing (P > or = .093). The inactive metabolite and inactive ring-opened form displayed greater AUCs in renal impairment. Hemodialysis removed approximately 10% of the eplerenone dose. Eplerenone 100 mg once daily was well tolerated in all groups. Considering that renal function had no significant effects on eplerenone CL/F and that eplerenone metabolites are inactive, no dose adjustment appears necessary in patients with renal dysfunction.

Topics: Administration, Oral; Adult; Aged; Area Under Curve; Creatinine; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Kidney Diseases; Male; Metabolic Clearance Rate; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renal Dialysis; Spironolactone

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), eplerenone and esaxerenone, cause hyperkalemia dose-dependently. We investigated the cytochrome P450 3A4-mediated drug-drug interaction between the MRAs and clarithromycin.. This retrospective observational study included adult hypertensive patients with MRA plus clarithromycin or MRA alone with a propensity score matching (1:1). The difference in serum potassium level (ΔK, maximum level - baseline level) between groups was compared using the Mann-Whitney U -test. Linear regression analysis was used to detect variables that correlated with ΔK in patients with MRA plus clarithromycin.. After propensity score matching (each nine patients), serum potassium level was elevated after treatment with MRA plus clarithromycin [4.3 (3.5 to 5.1) meq/l to 4.9 (4.0 to 5.5) meq/l, P  = 0.0234] and MRA alone [4.3 (4.0 to 4.7) meq/l to 4.6 (4.4 to 5.2) meq/l, P  = 0.0469]. Although there was no significant difference in ΔK between groups [MRA plus clarithromycin: 0.5 (0.1 to 1.1) meq/l vs. MRA alone: 0.3 (0.1 to 1.2) meq/l, P  = 0.7231], ΔK was significantly higher in esaxerenone plus clarithromycin than in esaxerenone alone [0.6 (0.5 to 1.1) meq/l vs. 0.1 (0.1 to 0.2) meq/l, P  = 0.0495]. Conversely, clarithromycin did not show a significant effect on ΔK in patients with eplerenone [0.4 (-0.2 to 1.2) meq/l vs. 0.8 (0.1 to 1.3) meq/l, P  = 0.5745]. A positive correlation was found between ΔK and age in patients with MRA plus clarithromycin ( y  = 0.03 ×  x - 1.38, r  = 0.71, P  = 0.0336).. The drug-drug interaction between MRAs and clarithromycin was evident, particularly in esaxerenone. Serum potassium levels should be closely monitored in older patients.

Topics: Adult; Aged; Clarithromycin; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Retrospective Studies

We present a case of a 48-year-old white HIV-1 positive man who presented an acute myocardial infarction. The patient was on ART for the last ten years with emtricitabine/tenofovir and ritonavir-boosted fosamprenavir. Eplerenone 25 mg/day was also initiated due to a left ventricular dysfunction. A week after discharge a routine laboratory examination revealed severe hyperkalaemia. Due to suspicion of a potential drug-drug interaction, both eplerenone and ARVs were interrupted. Despite daily treatment for hyperkalaemia, serum potassium levels normalized after two weeks. Eplerenone is metabolized by the hepatic P450 cytochrome isoenzyme CYP3A4; therefore, concomitant administration with CYP3A4 inhibitors, like ritonavir, may increase plasma levels of eplerenone and, therefore, the risk of side effects, mainly hyperkalaemia. Based on this case, it is important to alert the medical community of this possible life-threatening drug-drug interaction between eplerenone and ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor.

Topics: Drug Interactions; Eplerenone; HIV Infections; HIV Protease Inhibitors; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Male; Middle Aged; Myocardial Infarction; Pharmaceutical Preparations; Ritonavir

Topics: Chronic Disease; Eplerenone; Evidence-Based Medicine; Heart Failure, Systolic; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Topics: Eplerenone; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone

Still no randomised controlled trials versus spironolactone, but a prematurely terminated placebo-controlled trial with 2737 patients.

Topics: Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Hypertension is a major risk factor for the development and progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) are effective in the management of resistant hypertension but are not widely used in CKD because of the risk of hyperkalemia. We retrospectively evaluated the long-term effects and safety of MRAs added to a pre-existing antihypertensive regimen in subjects with resistant hypertension associated with stage 3 CKD. In all, 32 patients were treated with spironolactone and 4 with eplerenone for a median follow-up of 312 days. MRAs induced a significant decrease in systolic blood pressure from 162±22 to 138±14 mm Hg (P<0.0001) and in diastolic blood pressure from 87±17 to 74±12 mm Hg (P<0.0001). Serum potassium increased from 4.0±0.5 to 4.4±0.5 mEq l(-1) (P=0.0001), with the highest value being 5.8 mEq l(-1). The serum creatinine increased from 1.5±0.3 to 1.8±0.5 mg dl(-1) (P=0.0004) and the estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 48.6±8.7 to 41.2±11.5 ml min(-1) per 1.73 m(2) (P=0.0002). One case of acute renal failure and three cases of significant hyperkalemia occurred. MRAs significantly reduced blood pressure in subjects with resistant hypertension associated with stage 3 CKD, although close biochemical monitoring is recommended because of an increased risk of hyperkalemia and worsening of renal function.

Topics: Acute Kidney Injury; Aged; Alabama; Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers; Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors; Antihypertensive Agents; Biomarkers; Blood Pressure; Chi-Square Distribution; Chronic Disease; Creatinine; Diuretics; Drug Resistance; Drug Therapy, Combination; Eplerenone; Female; Glomerular Filtration Rate; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Kidney; Kidney Diseases; Logistic Models; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Eplerenone; Homeostasis; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Kidney; Magnesium; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aldosterone; Biomarkers; Canrenone; Cause of Death; Double-Blind Method; Early Termination of Clinical Trials; Eplerenone; Female; Heart Failure; Hospitalization; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Models, Cardiovascular; Molecular Structure; Multicenter Studies as Topic; Myocardial Infarction; Patient Selection; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renin-Angiotensin System; Research Design; Risk; Spironolactone

Resistant hypertension has evolved as an important global health care problem. Primary aldosteronism is one of several potentially reversible causes of resistant hypertension. Primary aldosteronism can be effectively treated, when recognized, with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, such as spironolactone and eplerenone. Each of these compounds can reduce blood pressure as monotherapy or when given with a range of other antihypertensive drug classes. These compounds have distinctive pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic patterns that require some forethought in their use before they are prescribed. However, as the use of mineralocorticoid-blocking agents has gradually increased, the hazards inherent to use of such drugs has become more apparent. Whereas the endocrine side effects of spironolactone are in most cases little more than a cosmetic annoyance, the potassium-sparing effects of both spironolactone and eplerenone can prove fatal if sufficient degrees of hyperkalemia develop. However, for most patients the risk of developing hyperkalemia in and of itself should not discourage the prudent clinician from bringing these compounds into play. Hyperkalemia should always be considered as a likelihood in any patient receiving one or the other of these medications. As such, steps should be taken to lessen the likelihood of it occurring if therapy is being contemplated with agents in this class.

Topics: Aldosterone; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Practice Guidelines as Topic; Spironolactone

Topics: Adult; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Chronic Disease; Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Female; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Kidney Diseases; Male; Middle Aged; Spironolactone; Young Adult

Mice lacking the beta1-subunit (gene, Kcnmb1; protein, BK-beta1) of the large Ca-activated K channel (BK) are hypertensive. This phenotype is thought to result from diminished BK currents in vascular smooth muscle where BK-beta1 is an ancillary subunit. However, the beta1-subunit is also expressed in the renal connecting tubule (CNT), a segment of the aldosterone-sensitive distal nephron, where it associates with BK and facilitates K secretion. Because of the correlation between certain forms of hypertension and renal defects, particularly in the distal nephron, it was determined whether the hypertension of Kcnmb1(-/-) has a renal origin. We found that Kcnmb1(-/-) are hypertensive, volume expanded, and have reduced urinary K and Na clearances. These conditions are exacerbated when the animals are fed a high K diet (5% K; HK). Supplementing HK-fed Kcnmb1(-/-) with eplerenone (mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist) corrected the fluid imbalance and more than 70% of the hypertension. Finally, plasma [aldo] was elevated in Kcnmb1(-/-) under basal conditions (control diet, 0.6% K) and increased significantly more than wild type when fed the HK diet. We conclude that the majority of the hypertension of Kcnmb1(-/-) is due to aldosteronism, resulting from renal potassium retention and hyperkalemia.

Topics: Analysis of Variance; Animals; Eplerenone; Hyperaldosteronism; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Kidney Tubules, Collecting; Large-Conductance Calcium-Activated Potassium Channel beta Subunits; Mice; Mice, Knockout; Potassium; Spironolactone

Topics: Eplerenone; Heart Diseases; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renin-Angiotensin System; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Spironolactone

The Epleronone Post-Acute Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure Efficacy and Survival Study (EPHESUS) trial demonstrated that selective aldosterone blockade with eplerenone significantly reduced total mortality by 15%, combined cardiovascular (CV) mortality/CV hospitalization by 13%, CV mortality by 17% and sudden cardiac death by 21%, vs. placebo when added to standard care in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and signs of congestive heart failure (CHF) following acute myocardial infarction (AMI). We retrospectively evaluated the effect of eplerenone vs. placebo in a subset of 1483 diabetic patients with LVSD and signs of CHF following AMI.. Diabetic status was determined from medical histories at screening. Analyses were based on time to first occurrence of an event. Results were based on a Cox's proportional hazards regression model stratified by region with treatment, subgroup and treatment-by-subgroup interaction as factors. The 95% confidence intervals for the risk ratios were based on the Wald's test.. Treatment with eplerenone in diabetic patients with CHF following AMI reduced the risk of the primary endpoint, a composite of CV mortality or CV hospitalization, by 17% (p = 0.031). The absolute risk reduction of the primary endpoint was greater in the diabetic cohort (5.1%) than in the non-diabetic cohort (3%). Hyperkalaemia occurred more often with eplerenone than with placebo (5.6 vs. 3%, p = 0.015). Among the diabetic cohorts, the prespecified endpoint of 'any CV disorder' occurred in 28% of the eplerenone group and 35% of the placebo group (p = 0.007).. Eplerenone treatment may reduce adverse CV events in diabetic patients with LVSD and signs of CHF following AMI.

Topics: Aged; Clinical Trials as Topic; Diabetes Complications; Eplerenone; Female; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hyperuricemia; Hypokalemia; Male; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Prognosis; Retrospective Studies; Risk Factors; Spironolactone; Treatment Outcome; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left

Topics: Aldosterone; Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Heart Failure; Hormone Antagonists; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Topics: Diuresis; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Interactions; Eplerenone; Fees, Pharmaceutical; Half-Life; Heart Failure; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Spironolactone

Topics: Contraindications; Creatinine; Eplerenone; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Myocardial Infarction; Spironolactone; Ventricular Dysfunction, Left