eplerenone and Gynecomastia

People with chronic kidney disease (CKD) requiring dialysis are at a particularly high risk of cardiovascular death and morbidity. Several clinical studies suggested that aldosterone antagonists would be a promising treatment option for people undergoing dialysis. However, the clinical efficacy and potential harm of aldosterone antagonists for people with CKD on dialysis has yet to be determined.. This review aimed to evaluate the benefits and harms of aldosterone antagonists, both non-selective (spironolactone) and selective (eplerenone), in comparison to control (placebo or standard care) in people with CKD requiring haemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD).. We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 5 August 2020 using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.. We included parallel randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cross-over RCTs, and quasi-RCTs (where group allocation is by a method that is not truly random, such as alternation, assignment based on alternate medical records, date of birth, case record number, or other predictable methods) that compared aldosterone antagonists with placebo or standard care in people with CKD requiring dialysis.. Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias for included studies. We used a random-effects model meta-analysis to perform a quantitative synthesis of the data. We used the I² statistic to measure heterogeneity among the studies in each analysis. We indicated summary estimates as a risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes, mean difference (MD) for continuous outcomes, or standardised mean differences (SMD) if different scales were used, with their 95% confidence interval (CI). We assessed the certainty of the evidence for each of the main outcomes using the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach.. We included 16 studies (14 parallel RCTs and two cross-over RCTs) involving a total of 1446 participants. Thirteen studies compared spironolactone to placebo or standard care and one study compared eplerenone to a placebo. Most included studies had an unclear or high risk of bias. Compared to control, aldosterone antagonists probably reduced the risk of death (any cause) for people with CKD requiring dialysis (9 studies, 1119 participants: RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.67; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonist probably decreased the risk of death due to cardiovascular disease (6 studies, 908 participants: RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.22 to 0.64; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence) and cardiovascular and cerebrovascular morbidity (3 studies, 328 participants: RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.76; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence). While aldosterone antagonists probably increased risk of gynaecomastia compared with control (4 studies, 768 participants: RR 5.95, 95% CI 1.93 to 18.3; I² = 0%; moderate certainty of evidence), aldosterone antagonists may make little or no difference to the risk of hyperkalaemia (9 studies, 981 participants: RR 1.41, 95% CI 0.72 to 2.78; I² = 47%; low certainty of evidence). Aldosterone antagonists had a marginal effect on left ventricular mass among participants undergoing dialysis (8 studies, 633 participants: SMD -0.42, 95% CI -0.78 to 0.05; I² = 77%). In people with CKD requiring dialysis received aldosterone antagonists compared to control, there were 72 fewer deaths from all causes per 1000 participants (95% CI 47 to 98) with a number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) of 14 (95% CI 10 to 21) and for gynaecomastia were 26 events per 1000 participants (95% CI 15 to 39) with a number need to treat for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) of 38 (95% CI 26 to 68).. Based on moderate certainty of the evidence, aldosterone antagonists probably reduces the risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death and probably reduces morbidity due to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease in people with CKD requiring dialysis. For the adverse effect of gynaecomastia, the risk was increased compared to control. For this outcome, the absolute risk was lower than the absolute risk of death. It is hoped the three large ongoing studies will provide better certainty of evidence.

Topics: Bias; Cardiovascular Diseases; Cause of Death; Cerebrovascular Disorders; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperkalemia; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Placebos; Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic; Renal Dialysis; Renal Insufficiency, Chronic; Spironolactone

The aim of this prospective, randomised, open-label, blinded-end point study was to compare the efficacy and safety of eplerenone versus spironolactone in patients with bilateral idiopathic hyperaldosteronism (IHA). After a 2-week washout period, 34 patients with IHA were assigned to receive either spironolactone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) or eplerenone 25 mg b.i.d. (n = 17) for 24 weeks. If the patients' blood pressure (BP) was not < 140/90 mmHg, the doses were gradually increased up to 400 mg for spironolactone and 200 mg for eplerenone. If the patients' BP remained uncontrolled, a daily dose of hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg was added at week 16. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients with BP < 140/90 mmHg at 16 weeks (i.e., with aldosterone antagonist monotherapy). The patients' BP was normalised in 13 out of 17 (76.5%) and 14 out of 17 (82.4%) patients in the spironolactone and eplerenone groups, respectively (p = 1.00). Systolic BP decreased more rapidly with eplerenone. Serum potassium levels were normalised (> 3.5 mmol/l) in all patients at 4 weeks. Mild hyperkalaemia was observed in two patients receiving 400 mg of spironolactone and in three patients receiving 150 mg of eplerenone. Two patients presented with bilateral painful gynaecomastia at the end of week 16 while receiving 400 mg of spironolactone. Switching spironolactone to 150 mg of eplerenone daily resulted in resolution of gynaecomastia and also maintained BP control. At the end of the study, 19 patients were on eplerenone and 15 were on spironolactone. However, this did not affect the primary end point, because the switch from spironolactone to eplerenone (in two patients) occurred at the end of week 16. It was concluded that eplerenone was as effective as spironolactone in reducing BP in patients with IHA. The risk of mild hyperkalaemia was similar with both drugs.

Topics: Adult; Antihypertensive Agents; Blood Pressure; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Eplerenone; Female; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Hyperkalemia; Hypertension; Hypokalemia; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Potassium; Prospective Studies; Spironolactone; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome

Topics: Aldosterone; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Hypertension; Hypokalemia; Meta-Analysis as Topic; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Topics: Administration, Oral; Aldosterone; Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hyperaldosteronism; Hypertension; Male; Middle Aged; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Renin; Sex Factors; Spironolactone

Topics: Ascites; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Hepatitis B, Chronic; Humans; Liver Cirrhosis; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Since the isolation and purification of aldosterone from adrenal extracts 50 years ago (Experientia 9 (1953) 33), scientists have learned a great deal about how and where aldosterone acts, the factors that control its release, what is its role in the pathophysiology of cardiovascular disease, how to make and study aldosterone antagonists, and for what medical purposes these agents are useful. In this paper, we will discuss the evolution of aldosterone antagonists from the relatively nonselective spironolactone (Aldactone), to the highly selective eplerenone (Inspra). Eplerenone represents a molecule with improved steroid receptor selectivity and pharmacokinetic properties in man compared to spironolactone. Recent clinical results have demonstrated that these improvements translate into tolerability and efficacy in patients with cardiovascular disease.

Topics: Aldosterone; Animals; Cardiovascular Diseases; Clinical Trials as Topic; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; History, 20th Century; Humans; Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists; Spironolactone

Topics: Diuretics; Eplerenone; Gynecomastia; Heart Failure; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Spironolactone

The use of spironolactone in the treatment of hypertension has been limited by the occurrence of sexual side effects, mainly menstrual disturbances in women and gynaecomastia in men. In order to minimize this limitation on the use of an effective potassium-sparing antihypertensive agent, two strategies can be proposed: (1) A decrease in the daily dose of spironolactone. In 182 patients with essential hypertension treated with spironolactone alone for a mean follow-up period of 23 months, daily doses of 75-100 mg were as effective on blood pressure as doses of 150-300 mg. In contrast, the development of gynaecomastia--91 cases among 699 men--was dose-related in 6.9% (50 mg/day) to 52.2% (150 mg or more/day) of the cases. (2) An improvement in the receptor-binding specificity of spironolactone. Three 9 alpha, 11 alpha-epoxy derivatives have been characterized in vitro in rats and in rabbits. They exhibited a 3- to 10-fold decrease of the antiandrogenic and progestagenic effect, compared with spironolactone. In humans, one of these derivatives counteracted the fall in urinary Na/K ratio induced by 9 alpha-fluorohydrocortisone at a 25 mg dose.

Topics: Blood Pressure; Female; Fludrocortisone; Gynecomastia; Humans; Hypertension; Male; Menstruation Disturbances; Potassium; Sodium; Spironolactone