entinostat and Adenocarcinoma

entinostat has been researched along with Adenocarcinoma in 7 studies

Adenocarcinoma: A malignant epithelial tumor with a glandular organization.

Research

Studies (7)

Authors

Clinical Trials (1)

Trial Overview

Trial Outcomes

Lysine Acetylation Change in CD45 Blood Mononuclear Cells Between C1D1 and C1D15 and PFS in Patients on Arm A

Peripheral blood samples (PBMCs) were collected prior to therapy and on Days 8 and 15 of cycle 1, for assessment of lysine acetylation, using an assay developed by the Trepel Laboratory, NCI/NIH. CD45 blood mononuclear cells were measured. Patients with lysine acetylation change of 1.5 folds or higher were compared to patients with lysine acetylation change of less than 1.5 folds. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Objective Response Rate (ORR)

Objective response rate was defined as number of patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) divided by all randomized patients. Responses were evaluated using the revised Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) guideline. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), and/or persistence of one or more non-target lesion(s). (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Overall Survival (OS)

Overall survival (OS) was defined to be time from randomization to death from any cause. Cases who were still alive were censored at the date last known alive. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until death

Patient-reported Diarrhea

Diarrhea was measured by Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy for Patients With Diarrhea (FACIT-Diarrhea) subscale form, which had 11 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FACIT-Diarrhea subscale score was calculated based on the scoring manual, subscale score ranges from 0 to 44, and higher score indicates less diarrhea. The primary comparison of patient-reported diarrhea between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Patient-reported Fatigue

Fatigue was measured by PROMIS Fatigue short form, it had 7 items and all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 to 5. The PROMIS Fatigue total score and T score were calculated based on the scoring manual. The total score ranges from 7 to 35, the T score ranges from 29.4 to 83.2, higher scores indicate more fatigue. The PROMIS Fatigue T score was used for arm comparison. The primary comparison of patient-reported fatigue between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Patient-reported Health-related Quality of Life

Health-related quality of life (HRQL) was measured using Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - General (FACT-G). The primary endpoint for HRQL was the FACT-G Trial Outcome Index (TOI) which was an aggregate score of 5 items from the FACT-G-Physical subscale (GP2, GP3, GP4, GP6, and GP7) and 6 items from the FACT-G-Functional subscale (GF1, GF2, GF3, GF4, GF6, and GF7). All items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FACT-G TOI subscale score was calculated based on the scoring manual, subscale score ranges from 0 to 44, and higher scores indicate better quality of life. The primary comparison of HRQL between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Patient-reported Nausea and Anorexia

Nausea and anorexia were measured by The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Treatment (FAACT)-additional concerns, which had 12 items, all items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 0 to 4. FAACT-additional concerns subscale score was calculated based on scoring manual. Subscale score ranges from 0 to 48, and higher scores indicate less nausea and anorexia. The primary comparison of patient-reported nausea and anorexia between treatment arms was based on the end of cycle 3 assessment. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline and end of cycle 3

Progression-free Survival (PFS)

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined to be time from randomization to the earliest documented disease progression as defined by the RECIST criteria, new primary breast cancer, or death without progression. Disease assessment was to continue until disease progression, even after non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started. Cases with incomplete follow up or without adequate disease evaluations were censored at the date last documented to be free of progression, regardless of whether non-protocol anti-cancer therapy was started or not. Disease progression was based on central review, and defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm. In addition, the appearance of one or more new lesions was also considered progression. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate PFS rate. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Time-to-treatment Deterioration (TTD)

Time-to-treatment deterioration (TTD) was defined as time from randomization to disease progression or death or worsening of symptoms, whichever occurred first. Disease progression was assessed per RECIST v1.1. Symptoms deterioration was measured by 6 items (GP1, GP2, GP4, GF7, B1, P2, scored 0-24) from the 8-item FACT-Breast Symptom Index (FBSI). Symptom deterioration was defined as two consecutive available decreases of at least 3 points from baseline using the 6-item FBSI in this trial, and the second visit time was used as the time of symptom deterioration in this case, unless it was the final score, for which one decrease was sufficient. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the median TTD and TTD rate at a certain time point. Symptoms were assessed every cycle for the first six months after randomization, every two cycles between 6 months and 1 year. It then were assessed based on the same schedule for tumor assessments until disease progression as specified below. (NCT02115282)
Timeframe: Disease assessed at baseline, then every 12 weeks until treatment discontinuation, then every 3 months within 2 years from study entry, every 6 months between 2-5 years and annually between 6-10 years from study entry, until first disease progression

Trials

1 trial available for entinostat and Adenocarcinoma

Other Studies

6 other studies available for entinostat and Adenocarcinoma